Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, July 2003, p. 3863-3870, Vol. 185, No. 13
0021-9193/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.13.3863-3870.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Physiology, Johns Hopkins Medical School, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
Received 6 December 2002/ Accepted 22 April 2003
|
|
|---|
35 µM) by the hydrophilic thiol-specific agent p-mercurichlorobenzosulfonate (PCMBS) in a substrate-protectable fashion; by contrast, two other thiol-directed probes, N-maleimidylpropionylbiocytin (MPB) and [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methanethiosulfonate (MTSET), have no effect. Use of variants in which the HisGlpT native cysteines are replaced individually by serine or glycine implicates Cys-176, on transmembrane helix 5 (TM5), as the major target for PCMBS. The inhibitor sensitivity of purified and reconstituted HisGlpT or its cysteine substitution derivatives was found to be consistent with the findings with intact cells, except that a partial response to PCMBS was found for the C176G mutant, suggesting the presence of a mixed population of both right-side-out (RSO) (resistant) and inside-out (ISO) (sensitive) orientations after reconstitution. To clarify this issue, we studied a derivative (P290C) in which the RSO molecules can be blocked independently due to an MPB-responsive cysteine in an extracellular loop. In this derivative, comparisons of variants with (P290C) and without (P290C/C176G) Cys-176 indicated that this residue shows substrate-protectable inhibition by PCMBS in the ISO orientation in proteoliposomes. Since PCMBS gains access to Cys-176 from both periplasmic and cytoplasmic surfaces of the protein (in intact cells and in a reconstituted ISO orientation, respectively) and since access is unavailable when the substrate is present, we propose that Cys-176 is located on the transport pathway and that TM5 has a role in lining this pathway. |
|
|---|
The regulation of expression of GlpT has been well described (20, 30, 35), but there have been fewer structure-function studies of the transporter itself. Thus, while the topology of GlpT conforms to the pattern expected of a member of the MFS (Fig. 1) (11; see also reference 9), there has been little work localizing GlpT residues or domains critical for substrate transport. In prior work with a related protein, UhpT, the hexose phosphate transporter of E. coli, cysteine-scanning mutagenesis implicated transmembrane helix 7 (TM7) (32, 33) and TM11 (12, 13) as lining the substrate translocation pathway. The research reported here employed a similar approach to the study of GlpT. The results of experiments using site-specific mutagenesis along with thiol-directed probes in both intact cells and reconstituted preparations led us to conclude that Cys-176, located in GlpT TM5 (Fig. 1), lies on the substrate translocation pathway. With regard to members of the MFS, therefore, this work identifies a new domain with the conformational accessibility required for translocation.
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. The topology of HisGlpT is shown along with the approximate locations of its seven cysteine residues (enlarged circles). Also shown at the extracellular boundary of TM7 is the approximate location of position 290 (square). The N-terminal extension containing the polyhistidine tag is also noted. Positions are numbered as they occur in HisGlpT.
|
|
|
|---|
Protein purification and reconstitution. HisGlpT was purified by metal chelate affinity chromatography, as described previously for UhpT (8, 29). Briefly, cells grown at 37°C were harvested 2 h after addition of 1 mM IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside) to induce expression of the protein. Cells were resuspended in 1/20 of the volume of 100 mM KPi (pH 7) containing 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 20 µg of DNaseI/ml. Cells were disrupted in the cold by using a French press (16,000 lb/in2), and after unbroken cells and cell debris were removed by low-speed centrifugation (10,000 x g, 30 min), membranes were pelleted (180,000 x g, 1 h) and resuspended at pH 8 in 1/50 of the volume of a solubilization buffer containing 100 mM KPi, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM G3P, 2 mM ß-mercaptoethanol, 20% glycerol, 1.5% dodecylmaltoside, and 0.2% E. coli phospholipid. After incubation for 1 h on ice, insoluble materials were removed by centrifugation (180,000 x g, 30 min), and the supernatant was applied to nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid agarose slurry preequilibrated with the same buffer. After overnight incubation, the resin was washed with 20 ml of the same buffer adjusted to pH 7 and containing 20 mM imidazole. HisGlpT was then eluted at about 1 mg/ml in a small volume of the buffer (pH 7) containing 300 mM imidazole instead of 200 mM NaCl. The purified material (≥70% purity) was stored at -80°C until use.
To prepare proteoliposomes containing HisGlpT, purified protein (10 µg) was mixed for 20 min on ice with 1 ml of a buffer containing 100 mM KPi (pH 7), 1.5% OG (octyl-ß-D-glucoside), and 10 mg of sonicated E. coli phospholipid/ml. Proteoliposomes were then formed by a 20-fold dilution at room temperature with a loading buffer (pH 7) having either 100 mM KPi or 50 mM G3P plus 50 mM K2SO4. They were then isolated by centrifugation (180,000 x g, 60 min), the surface of the pellet was rinsed twice with assay buffer (100 mM K2SO4-50 mM MOPS-K [pH 7.0]), and the proteoliposomes were then washed and resuspended in a small volume of assay buffer prior to assay.
Transport assays. To assay HisGlpT function in cells, induced preparations were harvested, washed, and resuspended as a concentrated stock by using iced assay buffer. Just prior to assay, an aliquot was diluted 10-fold with assay buffer at room temperature, and after a brief period of temperature equilibration, the assay was started by addition of 50 µM labeled G3P. The reaction was terminated after 1 min by membrane filtration (0.45-µm pore size; Millipore HAWP02500) and washing with assay buffer lacking substrate. The same general procedures were used to assay HisGlpT-mediated transport of [14C]G3P or 32Pi after reconstitution in proteoliposomes, except that the filters used had a pore size of 0.22 µm (Millipore).
To monitor inhibition by thiol-directed probes and to assess the protection afforded by G3P, cells or proteoliposomes were preincubated for 5 min with a probe with or without 1 mM G3P. Both the probe and protecting substrate were then removed by filtration (as described above), and residual GlpT activity was measured by overlaying cells or proteoliposomes, on the filter, with labeled substrate. The reaction was terminated by washing after an additional 3 min.
SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis. To monitor expression of HisGlpT and its cysteine substitution derivatives, samples were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE; 12.5% acrylamide), transferred to nitrocellulose by a semidry transblotter (Bio-Rad), and probed with a mouse monoclonal antibody (Qiagen) directed against tetrahistidine. Antibody binding was detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (SuperSignal; Pierce) using anti-mouse immunoglobulin G conjugated with horseradish peroxidase.
Materials. p-Mercurichlorobenzosulfonate (PCMBS) was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., while [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methanethiosulfonate (MTSET) and N-maleimidylpropionylbiocytin (MPB) were obtained from Toronto Research Biochemicals, Inc., and tricarboxyethylphosphine was obtained from Aldrich Chemical Co. Both dodecylmaltoside and OG were obtained from Calbiochem Inc. The E. coli phospholipid was obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc., and [3H]G3P (12 Ci/mmol), [14C]G6P (57 mCi/mmol), and KH2[32P]O4 (1 Ci/mmol) were obtained from Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Inc.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. HisGlpT function and the effects of thiol-directed agents. (A) Cells were given 50 µM [14C]G3P, and samples were withdrawn at the indicated times for filtration and washing. Solid and open symbols indicate, respectively, cells expressing HisGlpT and cells carrying the vector alone. The inset shows a Lineweaver-Burke plot derived from initial rate measurements (1 min) in three separate experiments, giving a Km of 48 µM and a maximal velocity of 62 nmol/min/mg of cell protein (data are means ± SEM). (B) Cells pretreated for 5 min with PCMBS (), MPB ( ), or MTSET ( ) prior to assay as described for panel A. It was found that 35 µM PCMBS resulted in a 50% inhibition of G3P transport. The inset shows that the inhibition achieved by 35 µM PCMBS was blocked by coincubation of cells with 1 mM G3P. Means ± SEM for three separate assays are shown.
|
To identify the cysteine(s) responsible for such PCMBS sensitivity, we analyzed variants in which HisGlpT cysteines were replaced individually by serine (Fig. 3A and B). In six of seven instances, the C
S derivative displayed a specific activity comparable to (50 to 150%) that of the parent protein, while in the remaining case (C176S), HisGlpT function was reduced by at least 10-fold; a parallel immunoblot suggested that the C176S variant is poorly expressed (if at all), for reasons that are unclear. Among the six functional C
S derivatives, we observed patterns of PCMBS inhibition (Fig. 3C) and substrate protection (data not shown) resembling that of the parental protein, with IC50 values ranging from 30 to 50 µM PCMBS (Fig. 3C) in the absence of substrate. These findings therefore suggested one of two possible explanations for the PCMBS sensitivity of HisGlpT (GlpT): either Cys-176, which remains in each of the C
S derivatives, is largely responsible for the observed PCMBS sensitivity or more than a single cysteine (possibly including Cys-176) contributes to this phenomenon.
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. PCMBS inhibition of HisGlpT and its derivatives. (A) HisGlpT expression was evaluated by probing cell extracts with antibody directed against tetrahistidine, as described in Material and Methods. (B) The levels of expression noted in panel A were used to normalize assays of G3P transport to derive the specific activities for the C S derivatives relative to that of the parental protein, HisGlpT. A similar comparison for the C176G variant is from a separate set of experiments. (C) The graph indicates the concentration dependence of inhibition by PCMBS for HisGlpT (), its C S derivatives (symbols as indicated), and the C176G variant ( ). For the C S derivatives, a 50% inhibition was achieved with 15 to 35 µM PCMBS.
|
S, T, or N) yielded no functional product, while four other substitutions (C176
G, A, I, or V) gave derivatives in which cells showed G3P transport at about 30% of the parental value. In preliminary tests, we monitored PCMBS sensitivity for these four derivatives and found that at 100 µM PCMBS, the mean residual activity was 83 ± 6% (mean ± standard error of the mean [SEM]) of the parental controls, indicating a marked resistance to the probe relative to the parental protein. The C176G mutant was selected for detailed study, and as shown in Fig. 3C, HisGlpT activity in this variant was reduced by only 20% at 100 µM PCMBS, a concentration that results in ≥95% inhibition in the other six cysteine substitution mutants. It seems likely, therefore, that the major component of PCMBS sensitivity in (GlpT) HisGlpT reflects an accessibility of Cys-176 to the externally added probe; while not proven by direct physical analysis, this working hypothesis guided subsequent work. Characterization of purified, reconstituted HisGlpT. The work described above established that Cys-176 of HisGlpT is accessible to external PCMBS in a substrate-protectable fashion. It was of interest to examine whether this residue is also accessible when this same probe approaches from the cytoplasmic surface of the protein. If so, then this would indicate that Cys-176 borders an aqueous pathway extending into the protein from both external and internal surfaces. In previous work with UhpT, Yan and Maloney addressed this question by comparing the responses of targeted cysteines in intact cells and everted membrane vesicles (32, 33). Here, to avoid the complexity of a cell- or vesicle-based assay system, we studied purified and reconstituted protein, an approach that was successful in analysis of the bacterial anion (oxalate) exchange protein OxlT (10, 34).
Metal chelate affinity chromatography of HisGlpT (Fig. 4A) yielded about 2 mg of partially purified (ca. 70%) protein per liter of broth-grown cells; while additional steps can give higher purity (4), we judged this partial purification to be sufficient for our biochemical study. The kinetic features of purified HisGlpT were characterized after reconstitution into proteoliposomes loaded with saturating concentrations of either KPi (100 mM) or G3P (50 mM) (see Materials and Methods) (Fig. 4B). This allowed tests of either the homologous (32Pi[out]:Pi[in] or [14C]G3Pout:G3Pin) or heterologous (32Pi[out]:G3Pin or [14C]G3Pout:Pi[in]) exchange reactions and verification that G3P is the preferred substrate. This work (Fig. 4B) suggested that the rate of the homologous self exchange of G3P is significantly greater than heterologous G3P:Pi antiport, a suggestion borne out by the kinetic analysis summarized in Table 1 and consistent with earlier findings with UhpT (21). These experiments also showed, as noted before (21), that the Michaelis constants for the various exchange reactions are largely independent of the trans substrate and that the apparent affinities for the organic (G3P) and inorganic (Pi) substrates differ by about 20-fold.
![]() View larger version (44K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Purification and characterization of reconstituted HisGlpT. (A) Purification of HisGlpT, as described in Materials and Methods, was monitored by Coomassie blue staining (left) and immunoblot analysis (right) after SDS-PAGE using samples of 10 µl (solubilized extract, flowthrough, and washes) or 2 µl (eluates). (B) HisGlpT was reconstituted into proteoliposomes loaded with phosphate (solid symbols) or G3P (open symbols) for assays of [14C]G3P transport (circles) or [14C]glucose 6-phosphate (squares). (C) PCMBS inhibition of HisGlpT, its C S derivatives, and the C176G variant was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Data are means for three or more independent experiments. Without inhibitors present, the specific activities (mean ± SEM for three experiments) for the indicated variants were as follows (values in micromoles per minute per milligram of protein): 0.37 ± 0.02 for HisGlpT, 0.35 ± 0.02 for C143S, 0.88 ± 0.04 for C154S, 0.15 ± 0.01 for C176G, 0.36 ± 0.03 for C209S, 0.55 ± 0.04 for C228S, 1.39 ± 0.09 for C322S, and 0.42 ± 0.04 for C366S.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Kinetics of HisGlpT exchange reactionsa
|
S derivatives show a marked sensitivity to PCMBS (IC50s of 20 to 30 µM). In these same tests, however, the behavior of the C176G variant failed to mimic the response found in cells. Thus, instead of being largely resistant to PCMBS (Fig. 3), the response of this variant suggested the presence of (at least) two components, one of which responded to low concentrations of PCMBS, as in the other C
S mutants, while the other appeared to be unaffected, even at an elevated (100 µM) probe concentration. The mixed behavior of the C176G mutant (Fig. 4C) suggests the presence of two distinct populations of HisGlpT transporters. Indeed, work using both UhpT (8) and OxlT (10, 34) showed that after reconstitution by detergent dilution (as in this study), about half of the population of transporters is oriented as in the intact cell (right-side out [RSO]),while the other half has an inside-out (ISO) polarity that presents the cytoplasmic surface to the external medium. This likely arises from the generally symmetric structure of these transporters, since the inner and outer surfaces look much the same (15). Moreover, for UhpT and OxlT, these two populations have equivalent kinetic behavior, so the presence of the two forms is not normally evident unless one uses probes with differential reactivities towards one or the other exposed surfaces (cytoplasmic or periplasmic). It seems likely that such a mixed population would also arise on reconstitution of HisGlpT; if so, then the behavior of the C176G mutant (Fig. 4C) has a simple origin. Thus, molecules in the RSO configuration would be resistant to PCMBS (as in intact cells), accounting for the observed 40 to 50% residual activity (Fig. 4C). On the other hand, the PCMBS-sensitive component would reflect the accessibility of one or more of the remaining cysteines on the exposed cytoplasmic surface of the ISO population, a sensitivity that could have been masked by tests with intact cells. This latter finding has been made using UhpT, one of whose cysteines (Cys-143) is modified by PCMBS in everted vesicles but not in intact cells (32).
Such considerations made it important to resolve the question of whether HisGlpT exists in both RSO and ISO configurations after reconstitution. To address this issue, tests of UhpT or OxlT exploited either the accessibility of an extracellular protease cleavage site, the use of a differential protease sensitivity, or the introduction of cysteines whose specific modification marks the internal or external surface (8, 10). For the work reported here, we chose the last approach, and for this reason we introduced a cysteine (P290C) into the extracellular loop connecting TM7 and TM8, a region known from previous work with UhpT to be critical for function (8, 22). Tests with intact cells verified that HisGlpT harboring the P290C mutation showed activity comparable to that of the parental protein (data not shown) and that HisGlpT function became highly sensitive to MPB and MTSET (IC50, ≤1µM) (Fig. 5A), unlike what was seen with the parental strain (IC50, ≥1 mM) (Fig. 2). More important, after purification and reconstitution, treatment by these same probes yielded the biphasic response expected of a mixed population of RSO and ISO orientations (Fig. 5B). To verify that these patterns of inhibition were of the expected character and reflected inhibition at the external surface of proteoliposomes, in a separate experiment (Fig. 5C) we followed treatment by these agents with exposure to tricarboxyethylphosphine, an impermeant reducing agent whose specificity for disulfide bond cleavage should lead to reversal of inhibition mediated by MTSET but not MPB. Indeed, exposure to tricarboxyethylphosphine had the expected result. These findings, together with those noted earlier (Fig. 2 and5A and B), led us to conclude that reconstitution of HisGlpT gives a preparation with both RSO and ISO orientations, as found with related transporters (see above).
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. The P290C mutation confers sensitivity to thiol-direct agents. (A) Cells expressing the P290C mutant were monitored for G3P transport in the presence or absence of 1 µM MTSET or 1 µM MPB, as indicated. In the absence of inhibitors, G3P transport was 3.2 ± 0.14 nmol/min/mg of protein (mean ± SEM for three experiments). (B) HisGlpT (squares) and its P290C derivative (circles) were purified and reconstituted in Pi-loaded proteoliposomes and pretreated with MTSET or MPB at the indicated concentrations prior to assays of G3P transport. For three separate experiments, we recorded specific activities (means ± SEM) of 130 ± 14 and 230 ± 7 nmol/min/mg of protein for G3P transport by HisGlpT and its P290C derivative, respectively. (C) Proteoliposomes were treated with excess (1 mM) MTSET or MPB, as described for panel B. After a wash to remove the inhibitor, proteoliposomes were assayed in the absence or presence of 1 mM tricarboxyethylphosphine (TCEP), an impermeant reducing agent.
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. PCMBS sensitivity of Cys-176. The P290C and C176G/P290C variants were purified and reconstituted into proteoliposomes loaded with 50 mM G3P and then exposed to 200 µM MPB for 5 min at room temperature to give a preparation in which only the ISO configuration was active. After a wash to remove MPB, pretreated proteoliposomes were given 25 µM PCMBS for 5 min at room temperature in the presence (solid bars) or absence (open bars) of 1 mM G3P. Subsequently, proteoliposomes were placed on Millipore filters, washed to remove additives, and overlaid with assay buffer containing [14C]G3P for 3 min for monitoring of residual activity. Data (means ± SEM for three experiments) are expressed relative to results with MPB-treated controls that were not exposed to either G3P or PCMBS. In the absence of treatments, the specific activity of the P290C derivative was 140 ± 12 nmol/min/mg of protein and that of the C176G/P290C variant was 79 ± 11 nmol/min/mg of protein.
|
|
|
|---|
Studies with intact cells (Fig. 2 and 3) strongly suggested that Cys-176 of HisGlpT is accessible to PCMBS from the extracellular phase, and use of reconstituted protein made it possible to examine whether this residue is also accessible to PCMBS from the cytoplasmic surface (Fig. 5 and 6). It was difficult to address this issue directly, because we were unsuccessful in obtaining a functional GlpT variant containing only Cys-176. As a result, our conclusions are drawn from experiments comparing responses recorded in the presence and absence of Cys-176, using variants with and without the C176G mutation. While this approach is less direct than use of a single target cysteine, as in previous work (10, 32-34), study of the response to PCMBS by the reconstituted system showed convincingly that in HisGlpT Cys-176 is accessible to PCMBS in both outward- and inward-facing conformations. By itself, this behavior fits the experimental definition of a residue on a translocation pathway (32). But we also note that in both situations the inferred PCMBS modification of Cys-176 is prevented by the presence of substrate. Substrate protection reflects a complex mix of phenomena, including steric blockage by the substrate and closure of the pathway to the target due to initiation of turnover. In either circumstance, however, this behavior is fully consistent with the idea of Cys-176 belonging to the set of residues whose conformational plasticity allows them to occupy a position along the translocation pathway. In reconstituted preparations, one also finds PCMBS inhibition of HisGlpT even in the absence of Cys-176 (e.g., the C176G variant). This is attributed to modification of one (or more) of the six remaining cysteine residues by PCMBS that approaches from the cytoplasmic surface (Fig. 5). We did not pursue this observation to identify the responsive cysteine(s), since this phenomenon has been noted before; in UhpT, for example, one finds cysteine residues that are targets of thiol-specific probes added to either the outside or the inside surface but not both (32, 33).
GlpT, UhpT, and OxlT each have 12 transmembrane helices (7, 11, 15), as do most members of the MFS, and identification of helices that delineate the transport pathway relies on inferences from genetic, biochemical, or bioinformatic studies. Thus, in work with UhpT and OxlT, we probed strategically placed cysteine residues with hydrophilic and impermeant thiol-active agents, such as those used here. This directly implicated TM2, TM7, and TM11 (10, 12, 13, 32-34) as helices containing residues exposed to solvent in both inward- and outward-facing forms of the transporter. The same tactics have now been used to study (GlpT) HisGlpT, leading to positive identification of TM5 as contributing to the translocation pathway. The functional relevance of TM5 and Cys-176 is further underscored by the fact that within the organophosphate transporter family, this helix contains the highly (>95%) conserved motif W173NXXHN178 (numbering as in HisGlpT) (9). Recent studies of other members of the MFS (GLUT1, TetA, and LacY) have also implicated TM5 (17, 19, 23, 26, 36) as having a role consistent with the conclusions reported here. Such work, largely based on a biochemical approach, is now further strengthened by the low-resolution (6.5 Å) crystallographic profile of OxlT (15), which identifies TM5 as one of eight helices (TM1, -2, -4, -5, -7, -8, -10, and -11) positioned to contribute to the translocation pathway.
This research was supported by grant GM24195 from the National Institutes of Health.
|
|
|---|
-helix that carries determinants of substrate specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 276:25107-25113.
-glycerophosphate in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 239:3098-3105.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»