Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, September 2003, p. 5125-5132, Vol. 185, No. 17
0021-9193/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.17.5125-5132.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Received 10 February 2003/ Accepted 2 June 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thiamine consists of a 4-amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methyl pyrimidine (HMP) pyrophosphate moiety and a 4-methyl-5-(ß-hydroxyethyl)-thiazole phosphate moiety, which are synthesized independently prior to their condensation (6) (Fig. 1). HMP is generated from an intermediate in the de novo purine biosynthetic pathway, aminoimidazole ribotide, the last intermediate common to purine and thiamine biosynthesis (18, 33, 34). Mutants lacking the first step in purine synthesis, catalyzed by the PurF enzyme (phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate [PRPP] amidotransferase), lack synthesis of purines but retain HMP synthesis under a number of growth conditions and genetic backgrounds (14, 15, 36). PurF is the only purine biosynthetic enzyme that can be bypassed in thiamine synthesis, indicating that phosphoribosyl amine (PRA) is the compound generated in a PurF-independent mechanism (15, 36) (Fig. 1). Mutations in gnd (gluconate-6-phosphate dehydrogenase) or zwf (glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase) prevented thiamine-independent growth of a purF mutant under otherwise permissive conditions (16, 36). These results demonstrated a role for the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway in this process. The requirement for the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway in PRA formation can be overcome by exogenous ribose (16, 36) or a null mutation in yjgF (17). Genetic attempts to define an activity responsible for PurF-independent PRA synthesis have been unsuccessful, leading to a model in which multiple enzymes contribute to PRA formation in vivo.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Inputs to the synthesis of PRA in S. enterica. Schematically represented are the purine, thiamine, and tryptophan biosynthetic pathways. When present, gene names are indicated by the biosynthetic step catalyzed by their product. The dotted lines represent the pathways proposed to contribute to PRA synthesis in the absence of the PurF enzyme. PR-anthranilate, phosphoribosyl anthranilate; PPi, pyrophosphate; R5P, ribose-5-phosphate; AIR, aminoimidazole ribotide; THZ-P, 4-methyl-5-(ß-hydroxyethyl)-thiazole phosphate; HMP-PP, 4-amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methyl pyrimidine pyrophosphate; TPP, thiamine pyrophosphate.
|
|
|
|---|
16
17) (44). MudJ is used to refer to the Mud1734 transposon, described previously (10). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains
|
Genetic methods. (i) Transduction methods. All transductional crosses were performed by using the high-frequency general transducing mutant of bacteriophage P22 (HT105/1 int-201) (39) as described previously (13). Transductants were purified by streaking on nonselective green indicator plates, and putative phage-free clones, identified by their light green color (11), were verified to be phage-free by cross-streaking with phage P22.
(ii) Isolation of the suppressor mutant. A pool of >70,000 cells containing random Tn10d(Tc) insertions was generated as described elsewhere (27, 29) and mutagenized with nitrosoguanidine (12, 26). A P22 lysate grown on this pool of cells was used to transduce strain DM1231 (purF2085 gnd-174::MudJ) to tetracycline resistance (Tcr) on nutrient agar plates. The Tcr transductants that remained Knr (i.e., retained the gnd-174::MudJ insertion) and were able to grow on glucose and gluconate minimal media supplemented with adenine were tested for growth in the presence of 0.5 mM serine. To eliminate yjgF mutants (17), only those transductants that were able to grow in the presence of serine were investigated further. All putative mutants were reconstructed by transduction into the parental strain. The presence of the two selected phenotypes among transductants was interpreted to mean that the selected Tn10d insertion was linked to the suppressor mutation. The chromosomal location of the relevant insertion was determined by sequencing with a PCR-based protocol (7). A DNA product was amplified with degenerate primers and primers derived from the Tn10d(Tc) insertion sequences as described previously (45) and was sequenced by the University of Wisconsin Biotechnology Center-Nucleic Acid and Protein Facility.
(iii) Isolation of trpR mutation. A phage P22 lysate grown on a pool of Tn10 insertion mutants was used to transduce a thr mutant strain to Tetr. The Tetr transductants were screened for Thr+ and resistance to 5-methyltryptophan (0.45 mM) to be consistent with map locations and phenotypes described for trpR mutants (2, 41). The resulting trpR3612::Tn10d(Tc) mutation was 80% linked to the threonine operon and 100% linked to 5-methyltryptophan resistance (41).
(iv) Phenotypic analysis. Nutritional requirements were assessed both on solid and agar overlays and in liquid growth media as described below.
(a) Liquid growth. Strains to be analyzed were grown to full density in nutrient medium at 37°C. After overnight incubation, cells were pelleted and resuspended in an equal volume of saline (85 mM). A 0.2-ml sample of this suspension was used to inoculate 5 ml of the appropriate medium (2% [vol/vol] inoculum). Culture tubes were incubated at 37°C with shaking, and growth was monitored as optical density at 650 nm on a Bausch and Lomb Spectronic 20D spectrometer. Alternatively, 2 µl of the cell suspension was used to inoculate 200 µl of the appropriate medium contained in each well of a 96-well microtiter plate. Growth at 37°C was monitored with a Spectra-Max Plus microplate spectrophotometer. The specific growth rate was determined as µ = ln(X/X0)/T, where X is optical density at 650 nm during the linear portion of the growth curve and T is time.
(b) Solid media. Nutritional requirements were measured in soft agar overlays as follows. A 0.2-ml aliquot of saline cell suspension (prepared as described above) was added to 4 ml of molten 0.7% agar and spread on an appropriate plate. Compounds to be tested were spotted at the indicated volume and concentration after the agar had solidified. Growth was scored after 24 and 48 h.
Molecular biology techniques.
Open reading frames were amplified by PCR with cloned Pfu DNA polymerase and the appropriate primers listed in Table 2. The resulting PCR products were purified and blunt-end ligated into SmaI-cut pSU19 (3). Plasmids were transformed into Escherichia coli strain DH5
and screened for vectors containing inserts. Analysis of restriction digest patterns for the resulting plasmids was performed, and the identities and orientations of the plasmid inserts were confirmed by sequencing.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Plasmids
|
Enzyme assays. AS activity was determined as described previously (20, 42, 49) by measuring the amount of anthranilate produced from chorismate and glutamine or from chorismate and NH4Cl. The initial rate of anthranilate formation was determined at room temperature with a SpectraMax GeminiEM spectrofluorometer. The reaction mixture contained 0.5 mM chorismate, 5 mM glutamine, 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), and crude cell extract in a final volume of 200 µl. When ammonium-dependent anthranilate synthesis was assayed, the reaction mix contained 0.5 mM chorismate, 50 mM NH4Cl, 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.7), and crude cell extract in a final volume of 200 µl. One unit of activity was defined as the appearance of 1 nmol of anthranilate in 1 min per mg of protein.
The PRT activity of AS component II was also assayed fluorometrically (20, 24) by measuring the rate of disappearance of anthranilate at room temperature. The reaction mixture contained 15 µM anthranilic acid, 0.3 mM PRPP, 10 mM MgCl2, 100 mM Tricine buffer (pH 7.6), and crude cell extract in a final volume of 200 µl. One unit of activity was defined as the disappearance of 1 nmol of anthranilate in 1 min per mg of protein. In all assays, between 0.5 and 0.7 µg of protein was added per reaction. To assay allosteric inhibition, tryptophan was added to a final concentration of 0.5 mM.
PRA-forming activity was determined by using a modified assay initially described for PurF (38), where synthesis of PRA from PRPP and glutamine is determined as a function of [14C]glycinamide ribonucleotide (GAR) produced in a coupled reaction catalyzed by GAR synthetase. A molecule of provided [14C]glycine is incorporated into the PRA structure. The reactions were performed in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) in the presence of 6 mM Mg acetate, 2.5 mM ATP, 25 mM [14C]glycine (26 nCi), 35 mM NH4Cl (or 6 mM glutamine), 2 µg of GAR synthetase, cell extract (0.25 to 0.35 µg of protein), and 0.35 mM tryptophan (when added). Reactions were started by the addition of PRPP (6 mM final concentration), and reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 4 h. Labeled GAR and glycine were separated by thin-layer chromatography on polyethyleneimine-cellulose with a methanol-pyridine-water system. The positions of radioactive spots were detected with a Cyclone Storage Phosphor system (Packard Instrument Company), and their identities were confirmed with known standards.
|
|
|---|
A mutation in the trpD gene allows PRA synthesis.
To define the site of the lesion responsible for allowing PRA synthesis in a purF gnd background, the location of the linked Tn10d(Tc) insertion [zdd-9147::Tn10d(Tc)] was determined by arbitrarily primed PCR (7). Sequence analysis determined that the insertion was in the acnA-cysB intergenic region at
28.7 min on the S. enterica chromosome. Further linkage analysis and data from three-factor cross experiments determined that the relevant mutation was located clockwise of the cobA gene on the circular chromosomal map. When an insertion in the nearby trp operon was used as a selected marker in three-factor crosses, PRA formation could not be recovered, suggesting that one or more of the tryptophan biosynthetic genes were involved in this phenomenon.
When the catalytic reactions of the tryptophan biosynthetic enzymes and glutamine-PRPP amidotransferase (PurF) are compared, a similarity between AS-PRT (encoded by trpED) and PurF is obvious (Fig. 2). The causative mutation was hypothesized to be an allele of trpD or -E that resulted in a mutant AS-PRT that is able to generate PRA in vivo. To address this possibility, trpE and -D were amplified from both the wild-type (DM1) and mutant (DM6417)strains and cloned into the mid-copy-number vector pSU19 (3), generating plasmids pIR-EDW and pIR-EDMS, respectively. Sequence analysis identified a single nucleotide difference between the genes amplified from the mutant and the wild type. The insert derived from strain DM6417 carried a C-T transversion at nucleotide 1084 of trpD, causing proline 362 of the peptide to be replaced by leucine (trpD3611). Subsequent experiments confirmed the assignment of this change as the causative lesion (see below). Pro362 resides in the PRT subdomain of AS component II, which consists of residues 202 to 531 of TrpD (28, 46). A comparison of multiple ASs from a variety of organisms shows that this residue is highly conserved. The crystal structure of the dimeric anthranilate PRT of Sulfolobus solfataricus has been published (30). While Pro362 is not conserved in S. solfataricus, this amino acid is located next to a conserved residue in the proposed anthranilate binding site, R364.
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. TrpDE- and PurF-catalyzed reactions show biochemical similarity. Biochemical reactions catalyzed by the AS-PRT complex (TrpDE) and glutamine phosphoribosyl amidotransferase (PurF) are illustrated to emphasize similarities. Each enzyme has a glutaminase activity and transfers a phosphoribosyl group to an amidated substrate.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. The trpD3611 allele restores thiamine-independent growth of a purF gnd mutant
|
Catalytic activity of AS-PRT is required to generate PRA in the absence of PurF. The trpD3611 allele could result in a form of AS-PRT that is able to generate PRA by stimulating an existing activity or generating a new one. Plasmids pIR-EDW and pIR-EDMS were used to address whether the trpD3611 allele had generated a new activity. These plasmids were introduced by electroporation into strain DM728 (purF gnd), and the resulting strains were tested for growth in the absence of thiamine. As shown in Fig. 3, both plasmids allowed the purF gnd mutant strain to grow in the absence of thiamine. However, pIR-EDMS, carrying the mutant trpD allele, resulted in an approximately twofold-higher growth rate. From this result it was concluded that the wild-type AS-PRT was able to generate PRA in vivo and that the trp3611 mutation had stimulated this activity.
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG.3. TrpDE, provided in trans, allows thiamine-independent growth. Growth analyses were preformed at 37°C as described in Materials and Methods. Growth of DM6808 [purF2085 gnd-181(pSU19)] ( ), DM6809 [purF2085 gnd-181(pIR-EDW)] ( ), DM6810 [purF2085 gnd-181(pIR-EDMS)] ( ), DM6811 [purF2085 gnd-181(pIR-DW)] ( ), and DM6812 [purF2085 gnd-181(pIR-DMS)] () in glucose-adenine medium is shown.
|
The AS-PRT complex is a dimeric enzyme with complex intersubunit interactions (4, 23, 31, 35) (see Fig. 5). To assess the subunits independently, wild-type and mutant trpD genes were amplified and cloned into pSU19 to generate plasmids pIR-DW and pIR-DMS, respectively. When these plasmids were introduced into DM728 (purF gnd), both allowed growth in glucose-adenine medium, as shown in Fig. 3. Significantly, growth allowed by the wild-type and mutant trpD plasmids was indistinguishable in both rate and yield. Interestingly, the rate of thiamine-independent thiamine synthesis allowed by the trpD genes alone was similar to that allowed by pIR-EDW, the plasmid carrying wild-type trpDE. Further experiments showed that a plasmid carrying only the trpE gene did not restore thiamine-independent growth of the purF gnd mutant strain (data not shown). These results indicate that at least in multicopy, TrpD was sufficient to allow PRA synthesis in vivo, but the trpD3611 allele failed to stimulate that synthesis. Unexpectedly, the thiamine-independent growth allowed by pIR-DW and pIR-DMS was prevented by tryptophan, possibly reflecting inhibition of the PRT activity previously reported (20, 22, 35). Because of common problems with assessing complementation and growth phenotypes with plasmids present, data from the experiments described above were considered only as a qualitative assessment of function and regulation; continued experiments utilized the chromosomal mutation(s).
![]() View larger version (65K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Schematic representation of wild-type and mutant AS-PRT complexes. AS-PRT catalyzes the first two steps in tryptophan biosynthesis, which involve amidotransferase and PRT activities of component II (TrpD). The site for allosteric inhibition by tryptophan is on TrpE, and its approximate location is indicated. Solid lines represent the defined reaction path. Dotted lines reflect the proposed reaction catalyzed by the AS complex leading to PRA synthesis. An asterisk indicates the position of the trpD3611 mutation in TrpD.
|
Can AS catalyze PRA synthesis in vitro.
Crude cell extracts were generated from stains DM6418 (wild type) and DM6417 (trpD3611) grown under conditions previously determined to induce the trp operon (21, 22). Three biochemical activities previously attributed to the AS-PRT complex were assayed. These assays measured glutamine-dependent AS, ammonium-dependent AS, and PRT activities, and the results are presented in Table 4. As anticipated, the addition of tryptophan inhibited each of these reactions. Further, the data showed that the trpD3611 allele decreased the PRT activity by
40%, consistent with the location of the mutant residue in the enzyme. While the PRT activity was reduced, the in vivo data suggested that this decrease was not sufficient to negatively affect the tryptophan biosynthetic capacity of the cell. The other two activities of the AS-PRT complex were not altered by the mutation.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. The trpD3611 allele alters catalytic properties of the AS-PRT complex
|
![]() View larger version (66K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Synthesis of PRA from PRPP and NH4Cl. PRA-forming activity in a cell extract from strain DM6417 was determined by using a coupled assay with GAR synthetase. In the coupled reaction a molecule of provided [14C]glycine is incorporated into the PRA structure. Synthesis of PRA from PRPP and NH4Cl was determined as a function of [14C]GAR synthesis. Labeled GAR and glycine were separated on polyethyleneimine-cellulose with a methanol-pyridine-water (20:1:5) solvent system. Quantification determined that lane 3 contained twofold more GAR than the control lane without NH4Cl. No increase in GAR formation was seen with cell extracts from DM6418.
|
|
|
|---|
AS-PRT is a multifunctional enzyme with complex regulation and multiple intersubunit and interdomain interactions (9, 23, 24, 32). Although the different activities associated with this enzyme complex appear to be functionally independent and can be physically separated (4, 28, 46, 48), interactions between the AS-II glutamine domain, AS-II PRT domain, and AS-I have been reported (9, 20, 22, 32, 35). The primary PRA-forming enzyme in the cell, glutamine amidophosphoribosyl transferase (PurF), shares several features with AS-PRT. Both enzymes have NH3- and glutamine-dependent activities (47, 48) that ultimately result in the condensation of a phosphoribosyl molecule and an amino group (Fig. 2). Significantly, P362 is located in the PRT subdomain of TrpD, consistent with the proposed effect of this substitution on PRA formation. Compared to the S. solfataricus sequence, P362 is positioned in the anthranilate binding site near the conserved R364 residue. In the recently solved crystal structure, R364 is proposed to provide a ligand to the pyrimidine ring of anthranilate (30).
The position of P362 in a critical binding site suggested that altered catalytic properties of the AS-PRT complex might be detected in vitro. Analysis of catalytic activities of AS-PRT in crude cell extract showed that the trpD3611 mutation decreased the PRT activity of the enzyme while leaving the AS activities unchanged (Table 4). Based on growth of the mutant strains, any reduction in phosphoribosyl anthranilate caused by the trpD3611 mutation was not sufficient to disrupt the normal role of this enzyme in tryptophan biosynthesis. Significantly, the mutant extract was able to generate detectable PRA from PRPP and ammonia. As expected, all catalytic activities detected were inhibited by the addition of tryptophan. To our knowledge, this is the first case of enzymatic PRA formation being detected in the absence of a functional PurF, and it justifies the interpretation of the in vivo growth results presented here.
Together, the biochemical results are consistent with the location of the P362L substitution within the anthranilate binding site in the PRT domain of the enzyme. One scenario for the flow of metabolites in the AS-PRT enzyme that could result in PRA formation from known substrates is schematically illustrated in Fig. 5. In the analyzed structure of AS-PRT, the binding sites for PRPP and anthranilate are too distant to undergo catalysis; therefore, domain rearrangements have been proposed to occur during substrate binding (30). We hypothesize that the P362L substitution could decrease the efficiency of anthranilate binding, affecting the proper conformational changes required for phosphoribosyl anthranilate synthesis, and favor PRA production by allowing condensation between PRPP and ammonia. Kinetic analysis of purified enzymes will be required to test this prediction.
While the trpD3611 mutation restored full thiamine-independent growth to a purF gnd mutant strain, the wild-type AS-PRT enzyme or the TrpD subunit alone was able to partially satisfy the PRA requirement of thiamine synthesis if provided in multicopy. This result suggested that in the wild-type enzyme either glutamine or the NH3 released on cleavage of the glutamine has the potential to react with PRPP in the AS-PRT complex to generate PRA. These results suggested that derepression of the trp operon might similarly generate PRA for thiamine synthesis. Although not obtained in numerous mutant screens for PRA synthesis, when trpR mutations were introduced into strains lacking purF, thiamine-independent growth was observed. This finding confirmed that under some conditions, wild-type AS-PRT is able to contribute to PRA synthesis in vivo.
While PRA formation by the wild-type AS-PRT complex was not detected in the purF mutant extract, it was possible that this enzyme contributed to thiamine synthesis under some conditions in vivo. The finding that tryptophan inhibited PurF-independent thiamine synthesis of a purF gnd yjgF mutant strain on glucose medium (data not shown) suggested that PRA formation in this situation involved AS-PRT activity. Multiple enzymes are expected to participate in PRA synthesis, making it difficult to define the contributors in vivo. In addition, the low levels of PRA needed to satisfy the cellular thiamine requirement, combined with the instability of PRA (38), make the biochemical approach equally laborious. The work described here has taken advantage of a mutant allele to identify the AS-PRT complex as a potential contributor to the formation of PRA in vivo. In addition, a new catalytic activity for a well-studied enzyme has been demonstrated.
This work was supported by competitive grant GM47296 from the NIH. Funds were also provided from a 21st Century Scientist Scholars Award from the J. S. McDonnell Foundation. I. Ramos was supported by a predoctoral fellowship from CONACyT (Mexico).
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»