Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6
Received 12 August 2002/ Accepted 17 October 2002
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Whereas the functional properties of DsbA have been investigated in detail, less is known about the factors that influence the expression of this catalyst. Most studies concerning dsbA regulation were carried out with E. coli, where dsbA is part of a two-gene operon that includes an uncharacterized (yihE) gene found immediately upstream of the dsbA coding region (7). Two promoters controlling dsbA transcription have been identified for E. coli. The proximal (dsbA) promoter is located in the 3' portion of the yihE coding region, and the distal (yihE) promoter is upstream of the yihE gene. Transcription from the proximal promoter is proposed to be relatively low and constitutive. Belin and Boquet constructed yihE null strains that showed a reduction in DsbA levels compared to the wild type, although this reduced level of DsbA expression showed no phenotype (7). When they examined a plasmid-borne yihE-dsbA::TnphoA translational fusion containing a frameshift mutation in the yihE gene in a yihE null background, the expression of the TnphoA fusion was reduced by one-third. The presence in trans of the wild-type yihE gene did not restore the wild-type levels of the fusion. The authors concluded that the frameshift mutation conferred a polar transcriptional defect on dsbA expression.
Pogliano et al. (51) showed that the activation of the two-component Cpx pathway, through a CpxR binding site located in the yihE promoter region, increased DsbA protein levels. This correlated with increased levels of transcripts originating from the yihE promoter as determined by nuclease protection assays (12, 51). Members of the Cpx regulon are part of a stress response system involved in sensing and responding to cell envelope protein folding defects (9, 52, 55). Cpx-activating signals include overproduction of the outer membrane lipoprotein NlpE (55), high-pH conditions (43), and an alteration in the phospholipid composition of the bacterial membrane (40).
In contrast to reports from E. coli, the proximal promoter region of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (herein referred to as serovar Typhimurium) dsbA showed more complex regulation of expression. Two dsbA-specific transcripts were identified for this organism and mapped to two separate promoters proximal to the dsbA coding region (19). Growth phase-dependent promoter activity, with high levels of activity in stationary phase, was demonstrated using a dsbA transcriptional fusion containing both dsbA-proximal promoters, and growth conditions, such as lowered pH and oxygen levels, were shown to affect dsbA transcription (19). In its natural habitats, serovar Typhimurium often encounters a variety of stressful conditions, including fluctuations in pH, hypoxia, oxidative stress, and nutrient limitation (6, 48, 57). The organism can actively adapt to survive under these conditions by inducing systems (for example, the acid tolerance response) and/or specific genes, including virulence determinants, that enhance cellular resistance and provide cross-protection to additional stresses (36, 57).
To study the possible effect of the upstream gene on the regulation of dsbA expression, the DNA sequence further upstream of serovar Typhimurium dsbA was determined and the transcripts encoded by this region were analyzed. While the sequence corresponding to serovar Typhimurium dsbA and the upstream open reading frame (ORF), termed rdoA (regulator of disulfide oxidoreductase A), is homologous to the E. coli yihE-dsbA operon, differences were identified in their respective control of dsbA expression. Our results indicate that the rdoA-dsbA cotranscript does not play a significant role in Cpx-mediated induction of dsbA transcription, unlike the situation proposed to occur with E. coli, although RdoA does influence DsbA protein levels. This study also showed that RdoA also affects flagellin phase variation in a Cpx-dependent manner, suggesting a role for RdoA in relaying Cpx signals.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Assays. Transcriptional activity from the rdoA::lacZ promoter fusion construct was measured in all serovar Typhimurium strains by assaying ß-galactosidase activity as described by Miller (41). Aliquots of cultures were assayed at time intervals throughout the growth of the culture or at specific growth phases. In addition, assays were preformed on one in five dilutions of aliquots, once the OD600 values of cultures reached a value of 1. Each experiment was performed at least twice.
RNA preparation and RT-PCR. Total RNA was isolated using Trizol (Life Technologies, Gibco BRL) from 1 ml of culture of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium SL1344 and E. coli MG1655 strains containing pND18 (inducible NlpE-overproducing plasmid) or control vector (pBAD18) after 1 h of induction with 0.4% arabinose or repression with 0.2% glucose. Approximately 20 µg of total RNA was subjected to DNase treatment (RQ1 RNase-free DNase; Promega) and subsequent purification using RNeasy columns (RNeasy Mini kit; Qiagen). Multiplex reverse transcription (RT) reactions (Retroscript kit; Ambion) using 100 pmol of internal control primer and the serovar Typhimurium-specific target primers Nm78 (5' CGCATCAACGAACACTTTACGG 3') and Nm88 (5' CCAACGACGAATCAACCAGG 3') or the E. coli target primers Nm103 (5' CCTGCGTTGATAAATACATCGC 3') and Nm105 (5' CCAACGCCGCATTAGCCAGG 3') were performed on approximately 1 to 3 µg of purified RNA with minor changes to the manufacturer's instructions. Changes to the protocol include longer heat denaturation of the RNA template (6 min at 80°C) and elevated incubation temperatures (56°C). In addition, RT negative control reactions were performed where water was added instead of the RT enzyme (data not shown). Multiplex PCR amplification was performed using an internal control primer pair and specific target primer pairs: for serovar Typhimurium, Nm88 and Nm89 (5' GGCAACATTCTATGGCGTG 3'); and for E. coli, Nm104 (5' GGAATATTCTCTGGCGCGATGGTCC 3') and Nm105 (5' CCAACGCCGCATTAGCCAGG 3'). Fifty-microliter PCRs were carried out using 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Life Technologies, Gibco BRL), 5 µl of RT reaction sample as a template, 50 pmol of each PCR primer pair, 1x PCR buffer, 0.2 mM (each) deoxynucleoside triphosphate, and 1.5 mM MgCl2. Template cDNA was denatured for 2 min at 94°C before Taq DNA polymerase was added. A 25- to 30-cycle PCR (94°C for 45 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min with a final extension reaction of 72°C for 7 min) was carried out. To aid in qualitative analysis, specific target RT-PCR products were normalized to an established endogenous internal control transcript (tsf encoding the elongation factor EF-Tsf), the expression of which is relatively constant in serovar Typhimurium at the growth phases studied in this work (26). RT-PCR primers used in the detection of tsf transcript are described by Holmstrom et al. (26). PCR products of both internal control transcript (563 bp) and target (246 bp for serovar Typhimurium rdoA-dsbA cotranscript only or rdoA monocistronic and cotranscript; 241 bp for E. coli yihE-dsbA cotranscript only or yihE specific and cotranscript) were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis on a 1.2% agarose gel containing 1 µg of ethidium bromide/ml.
Northern blot analysis.
Approximately 30 µg of total RNA from serovar Typhimurium SL1344 or E. coli MG1655 strains were separated on a 1.2% formaldehyde-agarose gel and transferred to a nylon membrane (positively charged; Boehringer Mannheim) as described by Fourney et al. (16). Membranes were initially probed with a serovar Typhimurium rdoA DNA probe or an E. coli yihE DNA probe and subsequently stripped and reprobed with a serovar Typhimurium dsbA probe or an E. coli dsbA DNA probe. Each of the probes was generated by PCR and gel purified using a Qiaquick gel purification kit (Qiagen): the N-terminus-specific serovar Typhimurium dsbA probe (position, 107 to 400 bp downstream of the dsbA ATG start site) using primers Nm86 (5' CTGGCGAACCCCAGGTACTG 3') and Nm78; a full-length rdoA probe (position, 25 to 855 bp downstream of the rdoA ATG start site) using primers Nm99 (5' ACGCTACACCCGGAAACCATC 3') and Nm89; an N-terminus-specific E. coli dsbA probe (position, 107 to 404 bp downstream of the dsbA ATG start site) using primers Nm102 (5' CTGGCGCGCCGCAAGTGCTG 3') and Nm103; and a C terminus E. coli yihE probe (position, 614 to 855 bp downstream of the yihE ATG start site) using primers Nm104 (5' GGAATATTCTCTGGCGCGATGGTCC 3') and Nm105 (5' CCAACGCCGCATTAGCCAGG 3'). Fifty nanograms of all probes were random prime labeled with an oligolabeling kit and [
-32P]dCTP (3,000 Ci/mmol; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The efficiency of labeling was monitored following procedure C of the manufacturer's protocol, and labeled probes were separated from unincorporated 32P-labeled nucleotides using a QIAquick Spin column and the QIAquick nucleotide removal protocol (Qiagen). All prehybridizations, hybridizations, Northern washes, and removal of labeled probes from membranes were performed according to the basic protocol described by Kingston (33). Washed membranes were subsequently exposed to a storage phosphor-imaging screen (Kodak). Phosphorescence signals were captured and quantitated using the Personal Molecular Imager FX (Bio-Rad) and Quantity One (version 4.0; Bio-Rad) quantitation software. For comparisons, the Northern signals were normalized to the 16S rRNA band of the specific RNA preparations loaded.
Gel electrophoresis and Western blotting. Periplasmic protein preparations were separated using a sodium dodecyl sulfate-12% polyacrylamide gel. Briefly, periplasmic protein isolation involved growing overnight serovar Typhimurium SL1344 (pND18) or control vector cells in 0.2% glucose (repressed) or 0.4% arabinose (induced) to an OD600 of 1. One milliliter of culture was centrifuged and resuspended in 250 µl of Tris-HCl (0.2 M). Subsequently, a solution containing 1 M sucrose in 0.2 M Tris-HCl, 2.5 µl of EDTA (0.1 M), 7.5 µl of lysozyme (4 mg/ml), and 500 µl of distilled water was added and incubated on ice for 2 min. A 30-min incubation was carried out after adding 20 µl of MgCl2 (1 M), and proteins were isolated from the supernatant by trichloroacetic acid extraction.
Two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis was carried out following the manufacturer's suggested conditions using immobilized pH gradient (Bio-Rad) strips of pH ranges 3 to 10, 3 to 6, or 4 to 7 in the first dimension. The samples were run in the second dimension on 12% acrylamide gels using the Protean II system (Bio-Rad). Gels were silver stained (66) and digitized using a transmission flatbed scanner. All data analysis was carried out using the BioImage software package (Genomic Solutions). A minimum of three sample replicates were carried out for each strain or growth condition examined.
Western immunoblots were carried out as previously described by Klapper et al. (34) using polyclonal anti-DsbA sera, peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody, and the SuperSignal West chemiluminescence detection system (Pierce).
Peptide mass fingerprinting. Protein spots of interest were excised from the acrylamide gels using a Bio-Rad spot cutter, digested with trypsin, and extracted from the gel pieces using a MicroMass MassPrep digestion robot. Mass spectrometric analysis was carried out using a MicroMass M@LDI mass spectrometer. The spectrum data were analyzed using the MASCOT software (50).
Creation of an rdoA deletion strain.
Primer Nm114 (5' GGAATTCGTCAACTGGGGCTCAACG 3') containing an EcoRI restriction site (underlined) and primer Nm115 (5' CGGGATCCTTGTCGTTCATCCCATCATCCGG 3') containing a BamHI restriction site (underlined) were used to PCR amplify an 881-bp DNA fragment (position, 855 bp upstream of the rdoA start codon to 11 bp downstream of the rdoA start codon) using the template pMEG1. This fragment (left flank) includes the first 11 nucleotides of the rdoA coding region and enough upstream sequence to allow for homologous recombination. The primers Nm116 (5' CGGGATCCACGGCTGAAATTGGTCTCA 3') containing a BamHI restriction site (underlined) and Nm117 (5' GGAATTCTGCTGCTCGTATCCATGC 3') containing an EcoRI restriction site (underlined) were used to PCR amplify an 806-bp fragment (position, 778 to 1,568 bp downstream of the rdoA start codon) using the template pMEG1. This fragment (right flank) includes the last 70 codons of the rdoA coding region and enough downstream sequence to allow for homologous recombination. The left and right flank amplicons were gel purified using the QIAquick gel purification kit (Qiagen Inc.), digested with BamHI, and ligated together. PCR amplification using 5 µl of the ligation reaction as a template and the outer EcoRI restriction site containing primers Nm114 and Nm117 was performed to amplify a 1.69-kb DNA fragment containing 11 bp of the N terminus and 210 bp of the C terminus of the rdoA ORF but lacking the intervening 766 bp of the rdoA coding region. This 1.69-kb rdoA deletion fragment was gel purified using the QIAquick spin column (Qiagen Inc.), digested with EcoRI, and subcloned into the ampicillin-resistant and streptomycin-sensitive counter-selectable suicide vector pKAS32 (21). Ligants were transformed into E. coli MC4100
pir strains and selected on ampicillin plates. Plasmid purified from these colonies was then electroporated into the conjugative E. coli Sm10
pir strain. This donor strain was conjugated with the streptomycin- and chloramphenicol-resistant serovar Typhimurium SL1344 recipient strain containing the plasmid pMP190. Transconjugants were selected on LB plates containing chloramphenicol (to select against the donor E. coli strain) and ampicillin (to select for the plasmids). Twenty colonies from each of the conjugations were then restreaked on streptomycin plates, permitting selection of single-crossover clones of the rdoA deletion fragment. Approximately 250 individual colonies were picked and patched onto streptomycin and ampicillin plates. Colonies in which a double crossover event occurred by homologous recombination of the rdoA deletion fragment grew on streptomycin plates but did not grow on ampicillin plates. One such colony (designated NLM 2214) was discovered, and colony PCR amplification confirmed the presence of the rdoA deletion fragment in the chromosome of serovar Typhimurium SL1344. Colonies were then screened for loss of the plasmid pMP190 by repeated subculturing in the absence of the selective antibiotic chloramphenicol followed by screening for lack of growth on chloramphenicol-containing plates generating NLM2239.
Cloning the rdoA gene. The coding region of the rdoA gene was cloned into the SacII site of pACYC184 by isolation of a SacII rdoA-containing fragment from pMEG1. This construct (pLMN20) includes the native rdoA promoter region and the first 60 bases of the dsbA coding region downstream of rdoA but does not encode functional DsbA.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The rdoA and dsbA promoters are induced at different points in the growth phase. It has been previously shown that a dsbA transcriptional fusion (pMEG2) is growth phase dependent with maximal expression in stationary phase (19). The activity of the rdoA promoter fusion was compared to that of the dsbA::lacZ promoter fusion vector to identify similarities and variations in the expression patterns of these two growth-phase-dependent promoters. The magnitude of rdoA promoter expression was higher than that of the dsbA promoter at all stages of growth (Fig. 2). For both promoters, ß-galactosidase activity decreases initially, indicating that ß-galactosidase turnover exceeds synthesis. At an OD600 of 0.1, the dsbA promoter drives a net increase in activity while the rdoA promoter activity does not surpass the ß-galactosidase turnover rate until the OD600 = 0.25. The ß-galactosidase levels then increase at a slightly higher rate with the rdoA promoter than the dsbA promoter until stationary phase, where the dsbA promoter-driven activity falls off somewhat. This variation in terms of the growth-phase-dependent activity of these promoters suggests that different regulatory mechanisms influence the transcription of the rdoA and dsbA promoters.
|
|
To identify the transcripts originating from the serovar Typhimurium rdoA-dsbA region and clarify their possible effect on dsbA regulation, Northern hybridization using serovar Typhimurium dsbA and rdoA internal probes was employed on total RNA harvested from wild-type SL1344 strains containing either the NlpE-overexpressing plasmid (pND18) or control vector (pBAD18) (Fig. 4B). Northern blot analysis of membranes probed with a dsbA-specific fragment detected two distinct dsbA transcripts in wild-type serovar Typhimurium (of approximately 0.8 and 0.7 kb), with a 2.5-fold increase in the level of the smaller transcript under NlpE-overproducing conditions compared to the level for "induced" cells containing the control vector. The two dsbA-encoding transcripts described here and by Goecke et al. (19) have been mapped to two distinct dsbA promoters located in the 3' end of the RdoA coding region.
|
To discern transcriptional similarities or differences that may exist in the same region in E. coli, Northern blot analysis was also performed with E. coli MG1655 strains that carried NlpE-overproducing or control plasmid (Fig. 4A). A striking difference between the two organisms was clearly demonstrated in which a yihE-dsbA cotranscript (of approximately 1.8 kb) was identified by using both E. coli dsbA and yihE probes (Fig. 4A). In contrast to serovar Typhimurium, a distinct increase of this transcript was distinguished between pND18-induced RNA samples and uninduced RNA samples, although the signal still appeared to be faint (approximately a 3-day exposure to phosphorimager screen) compared to the more abundant 0.7-kb transcript (an approximately 4-h exposure to phosphorimager screen). The E. coli RNA membrane probed for yihE displayed two separate bands of approximately 1.8 and 1 kb (Fig. 4A). The signals matched predicted sizes of cotranscript and monocistronic yihE mRNA. Distinct increases of both bands in cells overexpressing NlpE versus the control vector were also observed. Furthermore, strains containing the control vector and the glucose-repressed NlpE plasmid did not reveal detectable levels of either of these transcript signals.
Since the rdoA transcript was not easily detected using Northern analysis, RT-PCR was also performed to compare rdoA monocistronic and rdoA-dsbA cotranscript amounts in pND18 (nlpE)- and pBAD18 (control vector)-overexpressing conditions (see Fig. 5A for primers and Materials and Methods for strategy). Figure 5B shows RT-PCR amplicons of rdoA-dsbA cotranscript or cotranscript plus rdoA monocistronic transcript from SL1344 cells overexpressing NlpE and controls. The RT-PCR products were compared to measure differential cotranscript or rdoA monocistronic transcript expression, based upon an internal control transcript, tsf, encoding the elongation factor EF-Tsf (26). The expression of the internal control is constant in serovar Typhimurium at the growth phase studied and appears in similar amounts in SL1344 cells overexpressing NlpE or pBAD18 control vector cells for the specific RT-PCR amplicon examined. Figure 5B shows that there is very little difference in the amount of cotranscript in serovar Typhimurium cells under NlpE-overproducing conditions compared to the control vector. However, judged against the internal control, a definite increase in the quantity of the rdoA monocistronic mRNA plus cotranscript was observed in NlpE-overexpressing cells versus results for control vector-containing cells. Since we know from the RT-PCR analysis of the cotranscript alone that its expression level is comparatively equal between strains overexpressing NlpE and the control vector, this must mean there is a significant increase in the quantity of the rdoA monocistronic transcript in NlpE-overexpressing cells. This result confirms Northern blotting data on the increase in the amounts of rdoA monocistronic transcripts under the same conditions.
|
Phenotypes associated with RdoA. Although the data presented here point to different transcripts contributing to rdoA and dsbA expression levels, still nothing is known about the function of RdoA. It was thought that RdoA could play a role as an intermediate in the signaling pathways initiated by activating the Cpx system. The effect of rdoA expression on dsbA transcription was examined (Fig. 6), and it was determined that an increase in dsbA promoter activity occurred in response to NlpE expression. Although this change was modest (20% above uninduced level), this increase was not seen in the rdoA null strain. There was also a notable difference between wild-type and rdoA null strains in mid-log-phase cells without NlpE expression (Fig. 6, t = 0), indicating that the absence of rdoA increases dsbA transcription. This difference was not seen in stationary phase cells. It may be that lack of rdoA indirectly triggers dsbA transcription during exponential phase growth through other, as yet undefined, pathways.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
s is the stationary phase sigma factor that regulates the expression of a number of genes that are involved in the adaptive changes required for stress management during stationary phase (36, 39). Other promoters in E. coli, such as the P1 promoter of osmC gene (8), the promoter of the glgCAP operon (25), and the trxA thioredoxin gene promoter (38), have been reported to be growth phase regulated, also independently of RpoS. Expression of the rdoA promoter is sensitive to the media conditions. For instance, minimal medium growth conditions increased promoter activity (approximately 300 to 400 Miller units) throughout growth. The dsbA promoter is also more highly active in minimal medium, (19) although the reason is not clear. In the case of acidic minimal medium, the rdoA promoter was turned off during stationary phase. While the factors responsible for such a decrease are unknown, the results point out that rdoA expression is not essential for viability of serovar Typhimurium during stationary phase under acid-stressed conditions. Studies of gene expression under low-pH conditions have focused mainly on inducible gene expression, although clearly some uncharacterized genes are turned off (15). Two major low-pH-inducible systems or acid tolerance responses (ATR) have been described for serovar Typhimurium, based on the growth phase at which each becomes induced (14). The log phase ATR system, induced when exponentially growing cells are adapted to pH 5.8 and the pH is lowered further to pH 4.5, results in the induction of 50 acid shock proteins, a subset of them members of the RpoS, PhoPQ, or fur regulons (5, 14). The second, a distinct RpoS- and fur-independent, stationary-phase ATR, induces more than 10 stationary phase acid shock proteins (2, 14). Few genes have been identified that are repressed by low-pH conditions, two examples being serovar Typhimurium OmpF, a major outer membrane porin (15), and Shigella sonnei VirF, a transcriptional activator of the IpaBCD host cell invasion apparatus (43).
Although the rdoA (this work) and dsbA (19) promoters both show strong growth phase dependence, different properties were revealed in terms of growth-stage-dependent increases in promoter activity. In the case of the dsbA promoter, the global regulator H-NS, a "histone-like" protein, has been demonstrated to modulate dsbA promoter expression during mid-exponential phase and plays a role in the repression of dsbA transcription in early-exponential-phase growth (C. V. Gallant, T. V. Ponnampalam, H. Spencer, and N. L. Martin, unpublished results). Although the exact regulatory mechanism behind the induction in rdoA expression remains to be elucidated, the continued high level of expression of the rdoA promoter during stationary phase suggests that the rdoA gene product may be important for stationary phase processes for serovar Typhimurium.
For a serovar Typhimurium dsbA null strain, an elevated response of the rdoA promoter (an approximately 200-Miller-unit increase) is observed compared with results for a wild-type strain at every stage of growth. These results indicate that a lack of disulfide bond-forming ability (provided by DsbA) in the periplasm has a positive feedback effect on rdoA transcription for serovar Typhimurium. This implies that a signal transduction mechanism exists linking the presence of DsbA (in the periplasm) to rdoA transcription (in the cytoplasm). Such a system is most likely the Cpx pathway, responding to a higher incidence of misfolded proteins in the periplasm as described for E. coli (11, 51). Although the cpxRA genes have been sequenced for serovar Typhimurium, this two-component signal transduction pathway has not been characterized for this organism. However, support for the Cpx pathway being involved in stimulating rdoA transcription comes from the following: (i) the information available for E. coli on the Cpx up-regulation of the homologous yihE gene (12, 51); (ii) the presence of a CpxR-P recognition sequence in the promoter of rdoA and the increase of rdoA promoter activity under conditions of E. coli NlpE overproduction, which is not seen in a cpxR null background; and (iii) the increase in the levels of the 1-kb rdoA monocistronic transcript for both wild-type and dsbA null strains with NlpE overexpression.
The increase in serovar Typhimurium rdoA promoter activity under NlpE-overproducing conditions, coupled to the parallel increases of the 1-kb rdoA transcript and the 0.7-kb dsbA transcript under similar conditions, suggests that Cpx-mediated signals affect dsbA expression, either directly at the dsbA promoter or indirectly through an rdoA-related mechanism. The presence of a conserved CpxR binding site in the rdoA promoter suggests that the Cpx response is mediated through rdoA; however, Northern blot analysis and RT-PCR of NlpE induced and uninduced serovar Typhimurium RNA preparations showed very minor variations in rdoA-dsbA cotranscript production, far less than expected if the cotranscript serves as a source for functional rdoA and dsbA transcripts. Homologues of yihE/rdoA identified in Pseudomonas (P. stutzeri, 45% protein identity; P. aeruginosa, 43% protein identity; P. fluorescens, 44% protein identity) and Shewanella putrefaciens (52% protein identity), as well as the Bacillus subtilis YerI protein (25% protein identity), are not found immediately upstream of these organisms' dsbA genes. In these bacteria, yihE and dsbA may be coregulated via a regulon, but in each of these cases the contribution of a yihE-dsbA cotranscript to DsbA expression levels is impossible. In serovar Typhimurium, if a cotranscript is synthesized, its processing must be extremely rapid and complete, such that no detectable difference in the levels of the bicistronic mRNA is observed between NlpE-overexpressed RNA preparations and uninduced RNA preparations, even in the sensitive RT-PCR based assay system used here. Evidence from other studies suggests that such rapid processing is unlikely. For instance, the well-characterized RNase E processing of the E. coli Pap operon, papBA transcript, clearly shows differential amounts of the polycistronic papBA mRNA under different promoter-inducing conditions (45, 46). In another example, substitution of the native promoter of the E. coli rph-pyrE operon with an inducible promoter and analysis of the transcripts synthesized under induced and uninduced conditions showed obvious variations in the levels of the dicistronic rph-pyrE mRNA (1). Rapid processing of an rdoA-dsbA cotranscript could be up-regulated by the Cpx pathway as an alternative explanation for the lack of significant difference in the levels of the bicistronic mRNA between NlpE-overexpressed and uninduced RNA preparations. However, such a mechanism that links the activation of the Cpx pathway and increased RNase activity or mRNA turnover has not been described to date in the literature. Preliminary RNase protection assays have failed to detect any additional evidence for rdoA-dsbA cotranscription products (data not shown). Transcriptional regulation of this rdoA/dsbA region is therefore unique in serovar Typhimurium, since Pogliano et al. (51) and Danese and Silhavy (11) established that the cotranscript induced via the Cpx pathway in E. coli plays a significant role in the regulation of dsbA expression. In our hands, a clear increase in the yihE-dsbA cotranscript and the yihE-specific transcript was detected by both Northern hybridization and RT-PCR, confirming the view that the cotranscript contributes to dsbA expression in E. coli. The presence of extremely limited amounts of larger-than-1-kb rdoA-containing transcripts in serovar Typhimurium therefore seems more likely to be due to leaky transcriptional termination between the rdoA and dsbA coding regions.
Although it is clear that rdoA has an effect on dsbA levels, the precise mechanism of rdoA influence remains to be elucidated for serovar Typhimurium. One potential posttranscriptional mechanism would involve rdoA mediating an increase in stability of the 0.7-kb dsbA transcript, such that this transcript accumulates under Cpx-induced conditions. An analogous mode of regulation occurs in the posttranscriptional control of polynucleotide phosphorylase (pnp) during cold acclimation for E. coli (68). The increase of pnp transcript during cold shock is mainly due to the increased stability of the pnp mRNA brought about by a protein-RNA interaction and less, if at all, to the activation of the two upstream promoters (68).
Alternatively, RdoA could be a transcriptional regulator involved in relaying or modulating Cpx-initiated signals. There is an NlpE/RdoA-dependent effect at the level of transcription of the dsbA promoter; however, it is still unknown if RdoA is directly mediating this effect or if RdoA acts via another component. By using 2D gel electrophoresis, it was also established that RdoA is involved in flagellar phase variation under NlpE-overproducing conditions. Flagellar phase variation has been under investigation for a number of years, but the environmental signals initiating phase variation are poorly understood. It is known that phase variation is mediated by the reversible inversion of a 996-bp portion of the chromosome that either positions a promoter allowing expression of FljB along with a repressor of FliC (FljA) or displaces this promoter so that FljB and FljA are not expressed and the FliC gene, which is at a separate chromosomal location, is expressed (54, 69, 70). This DNA inversion is mediated by the Hin recombinase (44). At another level of transcriptional control, the abundance of functional FliA, a flagellar gene-specific sigma factor, influences flagellar filament gene expression (32), but since both the fliC and fljB promoters are responsive to FliA, it is not likely to be involved with Cpx-mediated phase variation. The nature of the actual signaling pathways influencing phase variation will be the subject of further study.
It is also interesting to speculate on the reason that the Cpx pathway is involved in phase variation. Otto and Silhavy (47) recently presented convincing evidence that the E. coli Cpx pathway and NlpE are involved in sensing and responding to bacterial cell adhesion to environmental surfaces. They hypothesize that NlpE may be involved in relaying an adhesion-specific signal to the Cpx system, as they showed that NlpE is required for normal adhesion to occur and NlpE is unlikely to be able to act directly as an adhesin. A change in flagellar type may also be important in an initial interaction with a surface or some additional virulence aspect in serovar Typhimurium. Using "phase-locked" mutants of serovar Typhimurium, it has been demonstrated that FliC-expressing strains have a selective advantage over FljB-expressing strains in a murine model for typhoid fever, although no difference in the ability to invade epithelial cells or in the induction of enteropathogenesis was found between FliC- and FljB-expressing strains (28).
Although the E. coli yihE-dsbA and serovar Typhimurium rdoA-dsbA regions share more than 79% homology at the DNA level and both organisms are closely related, they differ significantly in terms of their pathogenicity and the types of environment encountered. Therefore, differences in the transcriptional regulation of dsbA and rdoA as a response to the need for these proteins, important for growth and survival in specific conditions, is not unexpected. One poorly understood issue is the mechanism of rdoA influence over dsbA expression and the ultimate role of RdoA in the bacterial cell. A DNA array study of yihE and dsbA null strains of Shigella flexneri showed significant alterations in transcription levels of more than 100 different genes involved in diverse processes such as glycolysis, central intermediary metabolism, structural cell proteins, and transport proteins (37), lending little clarity to the role of yihE. Curiously, in the same study dsbA mutants caused a slight decrease in cpxA/R transcription, contrary to previous studies showing induction of the Cpx pathway in the absence of disulfide oxidoreductase activity (51). The work described here has identified two proteins, DsbA and FljB, whose expression is at least partially dependent upon RdoA. Further studies aimed at elucidating the function of RdoA and its relationship to DsbA, flagellar phase variation, and the Cpx pathway for serovar Typhimurium are currently under way.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
. We also acknowledge the Canadian Foundation for Innovation for providing funding to establish the Protein Function Discovery Facility at Queen's University, where the mass spectrometry work was carried out. We thank D. Hyndman of the Protein Function Discovery Facility for his assistance. This work was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) grant to N.L.M.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|