Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, January 2003, p. 581-591, Vol. 185, No. 2
0021-9193/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.2.581-591.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Departments of Biological Sciences,1 Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2R32
Received 30 August 2002/ Accepted 15 October 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The type IV secretion system used by bacterial plasmids is referred to as the mating-pair formation (Mpf) apparatus. The Mpf apparatus is a membrane-associated protein complex that functions in producing conjugative pili and subsequently transferring plasmid DNA (15). The Mpf apparatus consists of 12 or 13 proteins (15, 18), including the pilin subunit and usually a pilin-processing protein (i.e., acetylase [35] or peptidase [20]). The processed pilin subunits insert into the inner membrane before being assembled onto the donor surface by all, or some, of the Mpf apparatus components (32, 37). The IncF system produces F-pili, which initiate conjugative transfer by identifying suitable recipients cells and bringing them into close contact to form a stable mating pair (14). In other model systems, such as the IncP system, the exact role of the P-pili remains to be determined, although donors containing IncP plasmids also form stable mating pairs (47).
At the site of close contact between donor and recipient cells are regions of tightly appressed membranes, known as conjugative junctions (11, 47). Conjugative junctions are the most likely regions through which plasmid DNA would transfer between cells (27). It is thought that the conjugative junction consists of Mpf proteins, although the exact proteins remain to be identified (11, 47). The transferred DNA strand (T-strand), which exists as a relaxosome-T-strand nucleoprotein complex in the donor, is transferred into the recipient in the 5'-to-3' direction (25). Transfer has been proposed to occur via a two-step mechanism, whereby the relaxosome-T-strand first interacts with the coupling protein and then is actively pumped into the recipient by the coupling protein through the Mpf apparatus (30). After plasmid transfer and establishment, the recipient becomes a donor.
Some of the more clinically important antibiotic resistance plasmids belong to the IncHI1 plasmid group (50). For over three decades, IncHI1 plasmids have been implicated as a significant factor in the persistence and reemergence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, the causative agent of typhoid fever (22). The continued prevalence of IncHI1 plasmids can be partially attributed to the conjugative transfer functions of these plasmids, since horizontal transfer maintains a plasmid within a bacterial population. We have previously characterized the Tra1 region of derepressed R27 (drR27) and found that it contains the origin of transfer and genes encoding the relaxosome, coupling protein, and three Mpf proteins (26). drR27 is the prototypical IncHI1 plasmid that has an elevated transfer frequency compared to the wild type due to an insertion into htdA (48, 52). In addition, we have performed a preliminary analysis of the Tra2 region (45). In this study, we performed a functional and mutational analysis of the Tra2 region and compared the essential transfer components of R27 to other transfer systems. IncHI1 plasmids contain transfer region components that are chimeras composed of IncF-like and IncP-like plasmids transfer systems. We also note that the IncH and IncF plasmid Mpf systems are quite distinct from that of IncP. We discuss the phenotypic and ecological significance of the differences between IncH/F and IncP Mpf systems.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
|
Computer analysis. Laser gene software (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, Wis.) was used for nucleotide sequence analysis. The predicted protein sequence for each open reading frame (ORF) was compared to the GenBank nonredundant database using PSI-BLAST. We identified conserved motifs manually or with ScanProsite (http://ca.expasy.org/tools/scnpsite.html) and obtained predictions for molecular weight and pI values with Compute pI/Mw (http://ca.expasy.org/tools/pi_tool.html).
Mutagenesis.
Mutants with mutations of trhE, trhK, trhB, trhC, trhW, trhU, and trhN were created prior to this study using random mini-Tn10 mutagenesis, as described previously (45). Mini-Tn10 consists of a chloramphenicol resistance cassette flanked by Tn10 inverted repeats (23). To identify the insertion position for each mutant, we sequenced the region flanking the mini-Tn10 insertions by using the dideoxy method (Sequenase version 2; United States Biochemical Co., Cleveland, Ohio) with primers PNE11 (5'TATTCTGCCTCCCAGAGCCT) and PNE12 (5'TGGTGCGTAACGGCAAAAGC). Sequence results were compared to the complete nucleotide sequence of R27 (accession no. NC_002305). All remaining Tra2 genes (trhA, trhL, orf030, orf028, orf027, trhV, trhZ, orf017, orf016, trhO, htdA, htdF, htdK, orf009, trhP, orf004, and trhI) were mutated by gene disruption using the E. coli recombination system as described previously (26, 53). Gene disruptions were created by insertion of a chloramphenicol resistance cassette (cat from mini-Tn10) into each of the above-mentioned ORFs in a sequence-specific fashion. DNA substrates were generated through PCR with primers (
60 nucleotides) that produced a linear chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) cassette with 40-bp terminal arms homologous to the desired target site (Table 1). To screen presumptive mutants, the target gene was PCR amplified (using cloning primers in Table 1) and analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis (1% agarose). An increase in the size of the ORF by 900 bp demonstrated that the CAT cassette had been inserted into the target gene
Cloning of transfer genes. The primer sequences used for cloning Tra2 transfer genes are listed in Table 1. PCR products, which included terminal EcoRI and BamHI restriction endonuclease sites for cloning into pMS119EH or terminal HindIII and XbaI for cloning into pMS119HE, were cloned into pGEM-T (Promega) and then subcloned into either pMS119EH or pMS119HE. A His6 tag was engineered into the C terminus of each protein to allow detection of the recombinant protein by immunoblot analysis with anti-His6 antibodies (data not shown).
Conjugation assay. Conjugal transfer of drR27 was performed as previously described (26). For complementation experiments, E. coli donors (DY330R) which contained the R27 Tra2 mutant and an expression vector encoding the appropriate transfer protein were mated with recipients (DY330N). To determine the effect of overexpressing transfer proteins on the transfer frequency, each transfer protein was expressed in trans within a donor containing drR27 during conjugation experiments. Transfer frequencies were expressed as transconjugants per donor.
Phage plaque assays. To determine the Hgal infectivity of Tra2 mutants, phage spot tests were performed as previously described (26, 31).
|
|
|---|
|
View larger version (8K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. ORF map of Tra2 of R27. Black ORFs indicate genes required for conjugative transfer and Hgal infection. Stippled ORFs indicate genes which regulate R27 transfer frequency. White ORFs are not essential for conjugative transfer. Grey ORFs are partitioning genes, and the Inc region is a 3-kbp intergenic region involved in IncHI1 plasmid incompatibility (16). Black bent arrows represent the insertion location of mini-Tn10 and the direction of CAT transcription. White bent arrows represent the insertion location of the CAT cassette and the direction of transcription. The ORF map corresponds to coordinates 0 to 40 kbp and ORF003 to ORF034 on R27 (48).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Summary of computer analysis of nucleotide sequence of Tra2 of R27
|
![]() View larger version (94K): [in a new window] |
FIG.2. Alignment of type IV secretion secretin-like proteins of the TrhK family with the HrcC TTSS secretins and the PulD type II secretion system secretin. Represented below the alignment are the ß-domain and S-domain from PulD. The ß-domain is made up of the transmembrane regions which are embedded into the outer membrane, and the S-domain interacts with the lipoprotein. Alignment was performed with ClustalW using the BLOSUM scoring matrix, and shading was performed using GeneDoc in conservative mode with shading to four levels. Proteins (in the order in which they are listed in the alignment): TraK of F factor (GenBank accession no. AAC44189), TraK of R391 (AAM08021), TraK of Rts1 (BAB93771), HtdP of R478 (AAL27020), TrhK of R27 (AAD54050), TraK of pED208 (AAM90706), TraK of pNL1 (AAD03962), TraK of SXT (AAL59718), HrcC of Pantoea stewartii (AAG01463), HrcC of Erwinia amylovora (AAB49179), HrcC of Erwinia chrysanthemi (AAC31975), HrcC of Pectobacterium carotovorum (AAK97280), HrcC of Pseudomonas syringae (AAC05014), RscC of Pseudomonas fluorescens (AAK81929) and PulD of Klebsiella oxytoca (P15644).
|
The presence of nine Mpf proteins in the Tra2 region and three Mpf proteins in the Tra1 region (26) which are homologous to Mpf proteins from the F factor means that R27 contains an equivalent to each of the essential Mpf proteins from the F factor (15), with the exception of the pilin subunit. Given the presence of trhP, whose gene product is homologous to the pilin-processing protein TraF from IncP plasmids (12), we therefore aligned the putative core regions of TrhA and HtdZ (R478) with the core region of TrbC, the pilin of RP4 and R751, to identify conserved regions (Fig. 3). The core region of TrbC is processed with the removal of the N-terminal 37 residues by the host-encoded LepB and the removal of the C-terminal 27 residues by an unknown host peptidase (12). This 82-amino-acid (aa) peptide, which contains the four residues to be removed by TraF, was aligned with the processed form of TrhA and HtdZ (the leader peptide, predicted by SignalP, has been removed) using ClustalW. This alignment identified 15% identity and 34% similarity among these four proteins. Within the conserved regions are several residues which are highly conserved between TrbC and several of its homologs, including VirB2 from the Ti plasmid (13), particularly in the region which is cleaved by the transfer peptidase (Fig. 3).
|
View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Alignments of the processed pilin subunits from the IncHI (R27 and R478) and IncP (R751 and RP4) transfer systems. The protein sequences of the pilin subunits have the leader sequences removed and the cleavage site shown (gray arrow). The protein sequences of the IncP pilin subunits are missing the 27 C-terminal residues, which are cleaved by an unknown peptidase (black arrow 1), and the site of cleavage by the TraF peptidase is shown (black arrow 2). Alignments were performed in ClustalW and shaded using GeneDoc in conservative mode and three levels. Accession numbers are as follows: TrhA, AAD54053; HtdZ, AAL27017; TrbC R751, NP_044241; and TrbC RP4, AAA26429.
|
Gene disruptions and identification of transfer mutants. Seven mini-Tn10 transfer mutants have been identified within the Tra2 region (trhE, -K, -B, -C, -W, -U, and -N) (45). To identify a role in transfer for the remaining 17 Tra2 genes (the entire Tra2 excluding 4 partitioning genes), we systematically created gene disruptions of each of these ORFs in drR27, as previously described (26). Each mutant was then tested for its ability to transfer (Table 3). Gene disruptions of trhA, -L, -V, and -P abolished conjugative transfer of drR27. Disruptions of trhO and trhZ reduced transfer to 0.0002 and 0.006% of the transfer frequency of drR27, respectively, whereas disruption of most of the remaining genes had a minimal effect on transfer. Since mutations were made in drR27 (wild-type R27 with TnlacZ inserted into htdA), we inserted a CAT cassette into htdA within wild-type R27 to see if a different disruption of this gene (CAT [1 kb] versus TnlacZ [8.7 kb]) had the same effect on transfer. An insertional disruption of htdA by CAT increased the transfer frequency of R27 by 6,000-fold, as did the insertion by TnlacZ (52). These data, combined with those from the random transposon mutagenesis experiments, indicate that 11 genes within the Tra2 region are essential for conjugative transfer. In addition, trhO and trhZ play a role in conjugative transfer by enhancing the transfer frequency of drR27, whereas htdA represses the transfer frequency of wild-type R27.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Effect of mutations in Tra2 on drR27 conjugation
|
During the complementation experiments, the conjugation frequency varied between 144% (trhW) and 0.2% (trhV) of the transfer frequency of drR27. The variation could be due to polar transcriptional effects because of the CAT insertions and/or that the overexpressed transfer proteins reduce the conjugation frequencies. To address these possibilities, we compared the complementation frequencies for each mutant to the transfer frequency of drR27 when the corresponding transfer protein was overexpressed in donors during conjugation experiments (Table 3). Any difference in the conjugation frequency between the complementation and the overexpression experiments reflects polar effects on downstream genes. Overexpression of transfer proteins had a minimal effect on transfer frequencies, especially for trhL and trhV, which had the lowest complementation frequencies. This suggests that both mini-Tn10 and CAT insertions resulted in partially polar transfer mutations of several genes. This observation has previously been noted for the Tra1 transfer genes (26). Nevertheless, this approach allows the identification of essential transfer genes.
Hgal plaque assay of R27 transfer-deficient mutants. Hgal is an H-pilus-specific bacteriophage that lyses E. coli harboring drR27 to form distinctive plaques, allowing the application of a simple assay for H-pili production (26). Each Tra2 mutant was tested using an Hgal plaque assay to determine which mutants were resistant or sensitive to Hgal lysis (Table 3). E. coli cells containing transfer mutants trhA, -L, -E, -K, -B, -V, -C, -S, -P, and -W were resistant to Hgal. Hgal sensitivity was restored for each of these mutants when each mutant was complemented with the wild-type gene (data not shown). These observations suggest that these transfer genes are involved in H-pilus biosynthesis. The ability of the trhZ mutant to resist Hgal is interesting since this mutant is capable of transferring at very low levels, suggesting that R27 is capable of transferring at a low frequency in the absence of H-pili. E. coli strains containing drR27 with mutations in transfer genes trhU and trhN were capable of forming plaques, although they were notably smaller and not as clear as drR27 plaques. Disruption of htdA in wild-type R27 resulted in plaques which were larger than those produced by wild-type R27; this is attributed to the increase in H-pilus production by donors (52). E. coli cells containing an insertional disruption of orf030, orf028, orf027, trhO, orf017, orf016, htdF, htdK, orf009, orf004, or trhI were all capable of forming plaques, suggesting that these genes are not essential for H-pilus biosynthesis.
|
|
|---|
Of the 11 Mpf proteins encoded within the Tra2 region, 9 are homologous to Mpf proteins of the IncF transfer system. Of these, TrhL, -E, -K, -B, -V, -C, and -W are essential for conjugative pilus biosynthesis, the same function assigned to their F factor Mpf counterparts (15). TrhU and TrhN are not essential for H-pilus biosynthesis but do appear to play an auxiliary role in H-pilus assembly. Based on their homology and shared mutant phenotypes with TraU (36) and TraN (33) of the F factor, we propose that TrhU and TrhN also play a role in DNA transfer and mating-pair stabilization, respectively. Including the 3 Mpf genes from Tra1, R27 contains an equivalent to 12 of the 13 essential F factor Mpf proteins, with the exception of the pilin subunit, illustrating that the IncH Mpf/type IV secretion system has a common ancestry with the IncF system. Although these proteins are responsible for conjugal piliation and subsequent DNA transfer, their exact roles, collectively and individually, remain unknown. TrhC, a putative ATPase, was recently shown to form membrane-associated complexes, and complex formation was dependent on the presence of TrhB, TrhE, and TrhL (17). This suggests that these proteins form a multiprotein complex that may function in H-pilus synthesis or R27 transfer or both.
A novel observation is that TrhK and TraK-like homologs have similarity to secretins. Secretins are outer membrane pores that are found in type II and type III secretion systems and allow the passage of macromolecules across the outer membranes. Secretins form high-molecular-weight multimers (29), and preliminary results suggest that TrhK does as well (Lawley and Taylor, unpublished). Secretins consist of two domains, a nonconserved N-terminal specificity domain and a conserved C-terminal domain which defines the secretin family (19, 39). The C-terminal domain contains the ß-domain, which inserts into the outer membrane, and a S-domain, which interacts with a stabilizing lipoprotein (19). Both the ß- and S-domains appear to be conserved in TrhK. TraK of the F factor was recently shown to be present in the outer membrane of donor cells, and the C-terminal region interacts with TraV, a transfer lipoprotein (21). The presence of secretins in type IV secretion systems would suggest a mechanism by which DNA and pili could transverse the outer membrane of donors.
The two remaining Tra2-encoded Mpf proteins, TrhA and TrhP, are homologous to the pilin (TrbC) and peptidase (TraF), respectively, of the IncP transfer system. Although the similarity between the pilin subunits is weak, the presence of the peptidase implies a maturation process for the H-pilus which is analogous to that observed for the P-pilus. This observation points to a common ancestry for pilus subunit processing, but further work is required to demonstrate H-pilus cyclization.
Our analysis of Tra1 and Tra2 indicated that the transfer components of R27 have a common ancestry with the IncP and IncF systems (26). The relaxosome, pilin, and peptidase appear to have a common lineage with IncP plasmids, whereas the Mpf/type IV secretion system is of the IncF lineage (Fig. 4). There is no evidence of gene redundancy in any of these transfer systems. If the chimeric nature of these transfer systems did occur through DNA recombination between plasmids, the recombinant genomes subsequently underwent loss of redundant DNA, resulting in the current transfer systems. The separation of Tra1 and Tra2 by 63 kb may be a remnant of such a recombination-loss event. It has been proposed that the conjugative transfer regions of the Ti plasmid have evolved in a similar fashion (1).
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Comparison of the complete F, R27, and RP4 conjugative transfer regions (some regulatory genes are excluded). Essential transfer genes are presented with color and pattern, with the same color and pattern representing homologous gene products, while nonessential transfer genes are white. The Mpf genes are solid in color, and the coupling protein, relaxosome components, and regulatory genes are patterned. Light gray genes represent gene products with no shared homology. Thin lines above the R27 map indicate homologs to the IncF system, while thick lines represent homologs to the IncP system. Lipo, lipoprotein motif; red box, Walker A motif; green box, origin of transfer; capital letters for gene names, Tra; lowercase letters for gene names, Trb (F and RP4) or Trh (R27). Double slash indicates noncontiguous regions. Arrows representing ORFs are proportional to the length of the ORFs.
|
The core components reveal the common ancestry between the Mpf systems, whereas the nonconserved components probably reflect divergent evolution of these subfamilies to optimize the conjugation machinery for transfer in specialized environments. Conjugative transfer systems of the IncF/H subfamily (IncF/H/T/J) are capable of transferring both in liquid and on solid surfaces with approximately equal efficiencies, and they produce thick flexible pili, whereas the transfer systems of the IncP subfamily (IncP/N/W) transfer more efficiently on solid surfaces than in liquid and produce short rigid pili (6). It is likely that the conjugative pilus type dictates the mating capabilities of each subfamily (6). Furthermore, the differences in pilus structure may be attributed to the differences in the Mpf/type IV systems. In addition, the nonconserved Mpf proteins are probably responsible for the differences in mating capabilities. For example, the TraN (24) and TraG (34) proteins of the IncF subfamily, which are not found in the IncP subfamily, have been implicated in mating-pair stabilization, a phenotype that would enhance mating in liquid by stabilizing the mating pair(s) against the shearing forces of the fluid environment.
The above observations are consistent with those made in ecology-based studies on conjugative plasmid transfer. IncF/H Mpf systems are usually present in enteric bacteria, which are likely to encounter both the mammalian digestive tract and raw sewage, environments which would contain both solid and liquid milieux and are generally nutrient rich (51). Plasmids containing IncF/H Mpf systems transfer in the human digestive tract (2) and are known to transfer in aquatic environments more efficiently than those containing IncP Mpf systems (28). In comparison, IncP transfer systems are generally associated with soil organisms, like Pseudomonas and Klebsiella, and transfer efficiently in nutrient-limited soil environments. Plasmids containing IncF/H secretion systems did not transfer under the same conditions (43). It is therefore possible that the differences in the Mpf systems could reflect the differences in the ecological niches of the transfer systems.
We are grateful to Laura Frost for many useful discussions on bacterial conjugation and type IV secretion systems and to Trinh Ngo for reading the manuscript.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»