Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2003, p. 6104-6111, Vol. 185, No. 20
0021-9193/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.20.6104-6111.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology, University of Stellenbosch, Matieland 7600, South Africa
Received 14 May 2003/ Accepted 1 August 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although IncQ and IncQ-like plasmids are not self-transmissible, they are efficiently mobilized by conjugative plasmids of the Escherichia coli IncP
and IncPß groups. By using IncP plasmids or IncP-based helper plasmids, the IncQ plasmids have been successfully mobilized to a large number of hosts, including a wide range of gram-negative bacteria; several gram-positive bacteria, including Arthrobacter spp., Streptomyces lividans, and Mycobacterium smegmatis; and cyanobacteria, such as Synechococcus, as well as being mobilized into plant and animal cells (reviewed in reference 18). Likewise, pTF-FC2 has been mobilized from E. coli to several gram-negative bacteria and from Agrobacterium tumefaciens to plant cells (D. E. Rawlings, unpublished observations). This, together with the broad-host-range properties of their replicons, makes these plasmids highly promiscuous and interesting to study from the fundamental biology, ecology, and applied biology points of view.
There are two major groups of IncQ and IncQ-like plasmids, the most distinguishing characteristic between the groups being whether they possess a three-gene, IncQ-like mobilization system or a five-gene, IncP-like mobilization system (18). Examples of the three-mob-gene plasmid family are the IncQ plasmids RSF1010, R1162, and R300B and the IncQ-like plasmids pIE1107, pIE1115, pIE1130, and pDN1 (25, 27). Plasmid pTF-FC2 was the only example of an IncQ-like plasmid with a five-mob-gene system (19) until the discovery of plasmid pTC-F14. Recently, the sequence of another IncQ-like plasmid, pRAS3, with a five-mob-gene system has been observed (14), although no biology of this system has been reported. The amino acid sequences of the Mob proteins from the two groups of plasmids belonging to the IncQ family are not related to each other.
As part of this study, we report that like pTF-FC2, the mobilization genes of pTC-F14 are of the IncP type. Because pTC-F14 and pTF-FC2 are promiscuous plasmids that were isolated from acidiphilic, iron- and/or sulfur-oxidizing, chemolithotrophic bacteria that share a similar habitat, it is not unlikely that the plasmids may come into contact with each other. Plasmids pTC-F14 and pTF-FC2 have diverged sufficiently for their replicons to be compatible, which should allow them to coexist in the same host cell (9, 10). This raised questions such as have the mob genes diverged sufficiently to be plasmid specific, or will they complement the mobilization activity of each other? Was there competition between plasmids at the level of mobilization? That is, had one of the plasmids evolved a mobilization system that would allow it to dominate the horizontal transfer process, thereby giving it a selective advantage in preference to the other? Here we characterize the mobilization genes of pTC-F14 and report on the ability of the mobilization systems of pTC-F14 and pTF-FC2 to interact with each other.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Strains, plasmids, and primers used in this study
|
Mating assays. Donor and recipient (CSH56) cells were cultured separately overnight with appropriate antibiotic selection. Cells were washed three times in 0.85% (wt/vol) NaCl solution and mixed in a donor/recipient ratio of 1:10. An LA plate was spotted with 100 µl of this mixture and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. The agar plug was excised, suspended in 5 ml of 0.85% NaCl solution, and vigorously shaken to dislodge mating cells. Cells were pelleted by a 2-min spin in a microcentrifuge and resuspended in 1 ml of 0.85% NaCl solution. Serial dilutions were then plated onto media that selected for donor and transconjugant cells. The transfer frequency was calculated as the number of transconjugants per donor during the 1-h mating period.
DNA manipulations, sequencing, and bioinformatics. General techniques were performed according to standard procedures (21) or the manufacturers' recommendations. DNA was digested to give fragments with sizes of 700 bp to 1.2 kbp and cloned into the pUC19 vector. The DNA sequence was determined by a combination of sequencing from the ends of a number of subclones and synthesis of specific primers to obtain overlapping sequence from both strands. Sequencing was performed by the dideoxy chain termination method with an ABI PRISM 377 automated DNA sequencer, and the sequence was analyzed with a variety of software programs (mainly the PC-based DNAMAN [version 4.1] package from Lynnon Biosoft). Searches for sequences related to Mob proteins were performed by using the gapped-BLAST program of the National Center for Biotechnology Information at www.ncbi.nih.nlm.gov (1). Sequence alignments (based on CLUSTAL W) were carried out with the multiple alignment program, and amino acid sequence homology trees were constructed with the tree output program within the DNAMAN package.
PCRs. PCRs were performed with the Expand high-fidelity Taq DNA polymerase from Roche with a Hybaid PCR Sprint cycler. Plasmid pDER412 was used as template with primers mobEF2, mobDEF2, mobCDEF2, and mobER2 (listed in Table 1) to produce pmobCDE, pmobDE, and pmobE, respectively. Primers mobAR14, mobAR14#2, repBR14, mobC'R14, mobCR14, mobDR14, and mobER14 (Table 1 and Fig. 1) with pMmob as a template were used to give the mobilization region fragments (pMmob1 to pMmob9). After an initial denaturation of 60 s at 94°C, 25 cycles of 30 s at 55 to 60°C (depending on primer set) and an elongation step of up to 4 min (approximately 1 min per 1,000 bp) at 72°C were performed. A final extension step of 120 min at 72°C before cooling to 4°C completed the reaction.
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Genetic and restriction endonuclease cleavage maps of the mobilization regions of plasmids pTC-F14 and pTF-FC2. (A) The 5.55-kb BamHI-XbaI region of pTC-F14 showing the locations of the mob, repB, and pas genes as well as the oriT gene. The positions of the primers used to amplify and construct certain subclones are shown by short horizontal arrows. (B) The previously reported mob region of pTF-FC2 and subclones (20) used in this study.
|
|
|
|---|
) that was integrated into the chromosome of E. coli S17-1. Plasmid pTC-F14Cm was mobilized by R751 (IncPß) from E. coli HB101 at a frequency about 100-fold lower than that by the RP4 derivative in E. coli S17-1, while mobilization by R388 (IncW) was not detectable (Table 2). A 5.55-kb BamHI-XbaI fragment from pTC-F14 was subcloned into the nonmobilizable vector pUC19 and was found to be mobilized by E. coli S17-1 at frequencies that approached saturation. Saturation indicates that after 1 h of mating at a donor/recipient ratio of 1:10, the number of transconjugants was approximately equal to the number of recipients. This 5.55-kb fragment therefore contained all of the components needed for mobilization and was sequenced. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Mobilization frequency of plasmids and constructs
|
plasmid RP4 and the IncPß plasmid R751, respectively. MobD and MobE had weaker but detectable sequence identity (17 to 18%) to TraL and TraM of RP4 and R751. These Mob proteins clearly belong to the IncP-like family of conjugation-associated, DNA processing proteins (Dtr), and a dendrogram showing the relationship between proteins of this family is presented in Fig. 2 (15, 24).
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Phylogenetic relationship between the MobA/TraI, MobB/TraJ, MobC/TraK, MobD/TraL, and MobE/TraM proteins of the IncP and IncQ group 2 plasmids as well as pRA2. Since in the IncQ-related plasmids the MobA plasmids exist as a MobA-RepB fusion, only the N-terminal 470 amino acids were considered for comparison. The percentages shown represent amino acid sequence identities. Accession numbers are as follows: RP4, L27758; R751, U67194; pTC-F14, AF325537; pTF-FC2, M57717; pRAS3, AY043298; and pRA2, U88088.
|
and IncPß plasmids as well as the four plasmids that have mobilization regions related to the IncP plasmids are compared in Fig. 3. The four mobilizable plasmids each contained an inverted repeat sequence that has been shown to be the site at which the relaxosome of plasmid RP4/RK2 binds prior to nicking at the oriT gene (26, 29). The highly conserved nucleotide hexamer that immediately precedes the nic site is also shown. In contrast to the mobilization proteins, for which plasmids pTF-FC2 and pRAS3 were the most closely related, the oriT regions of pTC-F14 and pRAS3 were considerably more closely related (matches at 42 of 50 bp) than those of pRAS3 and pTF-FC2 (32 of 50 bp) or pTC-F14 and pTF-FC2 (30 of 50 bp) (Fig. 3).
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Comparison of the oriT regions of the IncP conjugative plasmids (A) and the IncQ group 2 and pRA2 mobilizable plasmids (B). Imperfect inverted repeat sequences are shown by horizontal arrows, while the highly conserved hexamer preceding the nick site is boxed. The small vertical arrow shows the nick site as determined for RP4/RK2.
|
50-fold less than that of the pUC19 construct (pMmob1) but still
100-fold higher than that of the parent plasmid (Table 2). This suggested that the increase in mobilization frequency was associated with the placement of the mobilization region within the high-copy-number vector pUC19. Deletion of most of repB (pMmob5) reduced the mobilization frequency by about 30-fold. The mobilization frequency was restored to saturation levels by placing a repB-expressing construct in trans with pMmob5 (data not shown). This indicated that the repB gene assisted but was not essential for mobilization. Using the mobE-mobA (pMmob5) construct as a starting point, sequential deletion of the mobE (pMmob6), mobED (pMmob7), and mobEDC (pMmob8) genes was carried out. Deletion of mobE had no discernible effect on the mobilization frequency, while deletion of both mobE and mobD (pMmob7) reduced the mobilization frequency by approximately 600-fold, whereas there was no detectable mobilization of the mobE-mobC deletion (pMmob8). Deletion of most of mobA from pMmob5 (pMmob9) resulted in a construct with a mobilization frequency below the detection limit. Comparison of the mobilization efficiencies and interaction between the mobilization systems of pTC-F14 and pTF-FC2. The mobilization frequencies of plasmids containing the mob genes of pTC-F14 and the pTF-FC2 when associated with their natural replicons were compared. Plasmid pTC-F14Km was mobilized from E. coli S17-1 donor cells to CSH56 recipient cells at a frequency of 2.83 x 10-3 transconjugants per donor, which was more than 3,000-fold less than that of plasmid pDER412, which contained the pTF-FC2 mobilization genes (Table 2). To test whether mobilization of one plasmid was affected by coresidence of the other, both pTC-F14Km and pTF-FC2 (pDER412) were placed into E. coli S17-1 cells, and the frequency of transfer was measured. The frequency of mobilization of pTC-F14Km was enhanced almost to saturation in the presence of pTF-FC2, while the presence of pTC-F14 had no discernible effect on the mobilization of pTC-FC2. To determine what property of pTF-FC2 was required for this enhancement of mobilization frequency, plasmid constructs containing combinations of pTF-FC2 mob genes subcloned into the vector pACYC184 were introduced into E. coli S17-1(pTC-F14Cm) cells. Coresident plasmids pAC221 (containing pTF-FC2 mobA and mobB) and pAC209 (containing mobA, mobB, mobC, mobD, and a truncated mobE gene) did not increase the frequency of mobilization. In contrast, pAC105, which contained mobC, mobD, and a complete mobE gene, enhanced the mobilization frequency of pTC-F14 by about 100-fold, although this was about 10-fold less than when the whole of pDER412 was present. To determine whether this result was due to the mobE of pTF-FC2, the gene was amplified by PCR and cloned behind the isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible tac promoter in plasmid pKK223-3 (construct pmobE). This construct did not improve the mobilization frequency of pTC-F14Cm. When a combination of pTF-FC2 mobD and mobE genes (pmobDE) were placed in trans and induced with IPTG, mobilization of pTC-F14Cm reached saturation. IPTG induction of a combination of the mobCDE genes (pmobCDE) enhanced pTC-F14Cm mobilization by approximately 150-fold to about the same level as with pAC105. This indicated that it was the combination of mobD and mobE from pTF-FC2 that enhanced pTC-F14 mobilization.
Interaction at the oriT regions. To test whether the mobilization proteins of the two plasmids could act specifically on the oriT regions of each other, plasmids containing one of the cloned oriT fragments (pOriT-F14 and pOriT-FC2) were transformed into E. coli S17-1 containing either pTC-F14Km or pDER412. Both cloned oriT regions were functional, because they were mobilized by their respective parent plasmids at a frequency comparable to or greater than that of the parent plasmid (Table 2). The construct containing the oriT region of pTC-F14 (pOriT-F14) was mobilized at a frequency of 1.48 transconjugant per donor when pTC-F14 was placed in trans, but only at 3.48 x 10-2 with pDER412 in trans. With both pTC-F14 and pDER412 in trans, the mobilization frequency of pOriT-F14 reached saturation.
In the pTF-FC2 oriT complementation experiments, pDER412 was able to mobilize a construct containing its own oriT gene (pOriT-FC2) at a saturation frequency, while mobilization by pTC-F14 was below the limit of detection. Complementation of the oriT regions was therefore unidirectional, with pTF-FC2 able to mobilize the oriT of pTC-F14, but not vice versa. We tested whether there was any detectable interaction between the mob genes of pTC-F14 and the oriT of pTF-FC2 by providing two subsets of the mob genes of pTF-FC2 in trans. Plasmid pTC-F14Km was able to mobilize pOriT-FC2 at a frequency of 3.54 x 10-1 when in the presence of the pTF-FC2 mobCDE genes (pAC105) and at a frequency of 1.67 x 10-2 when the mobAB genes (pAC221) were present. This result was surprising and suggested that at least one of the pTF-FC2 mobCDE gene products, as well as one of the mobAB gene products, is able to independently assist in the recognition of the heterologous pTF-FC2 oriT by pTC-F14.
|
|
|---|
To facilitate an investigation into the minimum region required for mobilization, the mobE-repB region of pTC-F14 was cloned into the nonmobilizable vector pUC19. The mobilization frequency of this construct (pMmob1) was at saturation level, which was about 104-fold higher than when the mobilization system was linked to its natural IncQ replicon (pTC-F14Km). An increase in mobilization frequency was not likely to be due to derepression of the IncP helper plasmid, because the mobilization frequency of the pTC-F14Km plasmid was not increased (data not shown). We considered whether this increase in mobilization frequency was associated with the high copy number of the pUC19 vector (up to 500 copies) and therefore transferred the mobE-repB region into the lower-copy-number vectors pACYC184 (20 to 30 copies) and pBR322 (25 to 50 copies). The mobilization frequency of these constructs (pMmob1184 and pMmob1322) was reduced 20- to 30-fold but was still 100-fold higher than that of pTC-F14Km (copy number 12 to 16). The increase in mobilization frequency was consistent with an increase in vector copy number, although this observation cannot be taken as proof that the mobilization frequency was affected by copy number.
We wished to detect whether all five of the mob genes were required for mobilization and whether the presence of the repB gene affected the mobilization frequency of pTC-F14. A characteristic of all IncQ and IncQ-like plasmids is that the mobA and repB genes are fused in such a way that the MobA (nickase) and the RepB (primase) may be synthesized as separate proteins or as MobA-RepB fusion protein. All three polypeptides have been detected for plasmids RSF1010 (22) and pTF-FC2 (7; Rawlings, unpublished). A fortuitous ClaI site was present in plasmid pTF-FC2 that allowed deletion of the repB primase gene (Fig. 1). This deletion did not affect the frequency of mobilization between E. coli strains. In the case of pTC-F14, a PCR-generated fragment was used to delete repB (pMmob5), and this reduced the mobilization frequency about 30-fold compared with that of a plasmid containing an intact repB (pMmob1). Placement of a repB-expressing construct in trans with the RepB-truncated MobA restored mobilization frequencies to levels similar to those when MobA-RepB was present, indicating that the decrease in mobilization was not due to an increase in structural instability of the truncated MobA. The repB gene was therefore not essential for mobilization of pTC-F14, although unlike pTF-FC2, the presence of repB did enhance mobilization. This is in sharp contrast with the three-mob-gene IncQ plasmid R1162, in which the MobA-linked RepB primase was essential for the recovery of plasmids in recipient cells (12). These authors argue that the mobA-repB gene fusion of R1162 most likely occurred after the IncQ replicon acquired mobilization genes and may be unique among IncQ-like plasmids. Deletion of the pTC-F14 mobE gene had no noticeable effect on plasmid mobilization, while the additional deletion of mobD reduced mobilization (600-fold) and the further deletion of mobC abolished mobilization. This is in contrast to pTF-FC2, in which deletion of mobE reduced mobilization 150-fold, with no mobilization detected on deletion of both mobE and mobD.
The discovery that when pTF-FC2 was coresident with pTC-F14, the mobilization of the latter plasmid was increased by about 3,000-fold was unexpected. We further discovered that the presence of the combination of the pTF-FC2 mobD and mobE genes, but not the individual mobD and mobE genes, was responsible for this increase. This suggests that the apparently dispensable pTC-F14 mobE gene does play a role in mobilization, but the pTC-F14 mobE gene is not optimally functional in the mating system used (described below). The functions of MobD and MobE proteins are unknown, and the same applies to the related TraL and TraM proteins of the IncP
and IncPß plasmids. TraL has been found to have an ATP- or GTP-binding Walker A box (24), and this box is present and highly conserved in the MobD proteins of the IncQ-like plasmids (data not shown). The role of MobD and MobE in facilitating the mobilization of one plasmid by another found in this study emphasizes the need to discover the function of the proteins.
In the present study, plasmid pTF-FC2 was clearly much more readily mobilized between E. coli strains than plasmid pTC-F14. Furthermore, a coresident pTF-FC2 could mobilize a plasmid containing the oriT of pTC-F14 (although not as efficiently as pTC-F14), while a coresident pTC-F14 could not mobilize a plasmid containing the oriT gene of pTF-FC2. Based on these results, plasmid pTF-FC2 might be expected to be a more promiscuous plasmid than pTC-F14. However, the fact that mobilization studies were carried out between E. coli strains by using the chromosomally located IncP plasmid RP4 as a conjugative helper plasmid must be taken into account. It is possible that pTF-FC2 is more suited to mobilization by this plasmid than pTC-F14, while there may be an as yet unknown helper plasmid that mobilizes pTC-F14 better than pTF-FC2. The reason for the unexpected observation that the mobD and mobE genes of pTF-FC2 were better able to assist pTC-F14 mobilization than its own genes could be because the MobD and MobE proteins are better suited to work with RP4, while the equivalent proteins of pTC-F14 may be better suited to function with a different conjugative plasmid.
The interpretation of experiments on the ability of plasmids containing the cloned oriT regions to be mobilized by the mob genes of the other plasmid is not fully clear. The oriT of pTC-F14 could be mobilized by its own mob proteins, and this mobilization frequency was enhanced in the presence of pTF-FC2. This result was consistent with the ability of pTF-FC2 to enhance the mobilization frequency of pTC-F14. Plasmid pTC-F14 was not able to mobilize a plasmid containing the oriT of pTF-FC2, unless some of the pTF-FC2 genes were present. What was surprising is that when we attempted to determine which of the pTF-FC2 mobAB or mobCDE genes were required, we found that either set of genes partly enhanced mobilization. A possible explanation is that more than one of the products of the pTF-FC2 mob genes are likely to enhance binding of the mobilization complex to the oriT of pTF-FC2. The nicking and processing of DNA prior to plasmid transfer by conjugation are frequently plasmid specific. For example, despite the high degree of similarity between the DNA-processing transfer proteins and the oriT regions of the IncP plasmids RP4/RK2 and R751, the oriT of RP4/RK2 cannot be transferred by R751 (8). Transfer of the RP4/RK2 oriT took place only when the specific traJ and traK genes of RK2/RP4 were present, with traI also being required, although this was not plasmid specific. Plasmid RP4 TraJ (29) and TraK (30) proteins bind specifically to different features of the oriT region. In the case of pTF-FC2, it is likely that MobB (related to TraJ) and MobC (related to TraK) of pTF-FC2 could bind to its own oriT and thereby assist the otherwise oriT-specific proteins of pTC-F14 to recognize the oriT of pTF-FC2.
Part of the motivation for this study was to gain an understanding of the evolution of mobilization systems. The sequence similarity between the proteins associated with plasmid replication and mobilization suggests that plasmids pTC-F14 and pTF-FC2 share a common ancestor. It has been reported that plasmids pTC-F14 and pTF-FC2 are compatible in E. coli, and this indicates that replicons of the plasmids have diverged sufficiently for them to function as independent units. Pressure for the replicons to diverge may have arisen because the two broad-host-range, promiscuous plasmids occur in bacteria that share a similar ecological niche. This means they may have frequently encountered each other, and divergence to the point of compatiblity would mean that the plasmids will not exclude each other from the same host cell and thereby would each have an increased "replication space." It was of interest to discover whether the mobilization systems of these related plasmids would compete with each other. If one plasmid has a more dominant mobilization system, it would presumably be transferred horizontally to more host cells than the competing plasmid and thereby dominate an ecosystem. No reduction in mobilization frequency of one plasmid when coresident with the other plasmid was detected. In contrast, a coresident pTF-FC2 appeared to assist the mobilization of pTC-F14. Similarly, the cloned oriT region of pTF-FC2 could be mobilized by a coresident pTC-F14 when some but not all of the pTF-FC2 mob genes were present.
|
|
|---|
plasmids, compilation and comparative analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 239:623-663.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»