This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Campos, J. Articles by Fando, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Campos, J. Articles by Fando, R.

Novel Type of Specialized Transduction for CTX or Its Satellite Phage RS1 Mediated by Filamentous Phage VGJ in Vibrio cholerae

Departamento de Genética, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas, AP 6412, Havana, Cuba

Received 25 July 2003/ Accepted 19 September 2003

	ABSTRACT

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The main virulence factor of Vibrio cholerae, the cholera toxin, is encoded by the ctxAB operon, which is contained in the genome of the lysogenic filamentous phage CTX. This phage transmits ctxAB genes between V. cholerae bacterial populations that express toxin-coregulated pilus (TCP), the CTX receptor. In investigating new forms of ctxAB transmission, we found that V. cholerae filamentous phage VGJ, which uses the mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin (MSHA) pilus as a receptor, transmits CTX or its satellite phage RS1 by an efficient and highly specific TCP-independent mechanism. This is a novel type of specialized transduction consisting in the site-specific cointegration of VGJ and CTX (or RS1) replicative forms to produce a single hybrid molecule, which generates a single-stranded DNA hybrid genome that is packaged into hybrid viral particles designated HybP (for the VGJ/CTX hybrid) and HybRS (for the VGJ/RS1 hybrid). The hybrid phages replicate by using the VGJ replicating functions and use the VGJ capsid, retaining the ability to infect via MSHA. The hybrid phages infect most tested strains more efficiently than CTX, even under in vitro optimal conditions for TCP expression. Infection and lysogenization with HybP revert the V. cholerae live attenuated vaccine strain 1333 to virulence. Our results reinforce that TCP is not indispensable for the acquisition of CTX. Thus, we discuss an alternative to the current accepted evolutionary model for the emergence of new toxigenic strains of V. cholerae and the importance of our findings for the development of an environmentally safer live attenuated cholera vaccine.

	INTRODUCTION

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The filamentous phage CTX contains the ctxAB genes encoding cholera toxin (CT), the main virulence factor of the pathogenic gram-negative bacterium Vibrio cholerae (49). In toxigenic El Tor and O139 strains of V. cholerae CTX is integrated at the dif site in the bacterial genome arrayed in different tandem structures along with the related satellite phage RS1 (11, 39). The genome of RS1 is a short version of the genome of CTX, which contains genes encoding proteins needed for replication (RstA), integration (RstB), and regulation of gene expression (RstR and RstC) but lacks the genes encoding proteins needed for assembling and secretion of viral particles (Psh, Cep, pIII^CTX, Ace, and Zot), as well as CT, which is not necessary for phage morphogenesis (11). Thus, satellite phage RS1 can replicate autonomously but depends on its helper phage CTX for assembly and secretion and thereby for transmission of RS1 viral particles (11). Conversely, RS1 encodes the antirepressor RstC, which is not present in CTX (9). This protein promotes transcription of CTX and RS1 genes by counteracting the activity of the phage repressor RstR (9). Thus, RS1 enhances transmission of both CTX and itself by means of RstC antirepressor activity (9).

Classical strains of V. cholerae contain nonfunctional CTX prophages, whereas El Tor and O139 strains contain fully active prophages that produce infective CTX viral particles (10). CTX site specifically integrates into the host chromosome by a process dependent on the host recombinases XerC and XerD, which ordinarily catalyze the resolution of chromosome dimers at the dif recombination site (25). Other filamentous phages such as f237 of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Lf of Xanthomonas campestris, Xff1 of Xilella fastidiosa, CUS-2 of Yersinia pestis, and VGJ of V. cholerae seem to exploit the XerCD recombination system to integrate into the chromosome of their hosts, suggesting that lysogenic filamentous phages are more common than initially thought (5, 25, 26).

CTX infects V. cholerae through toxin-coregulated pilus (TCP) (49), a type IV pilus essential for intestinal colonization (47) that is encoded by a gene cluster contained in the V. cholerae pathogenicity island (VPI) (33). Although VPI seems to move horizontally between bacterial populations of V. cholerae, the transfer mechanism is still controversial. Karaolis et al. presented data suggesting that VPI is the prophage state of another filamentous phage, VPI, which they thought to use TcpA as major capsid protein (34); however, this hypothesis has raised several unanswered questions (11), and the results from that study could not be reproduced by other researchers (16). Perhaps VPI transmission is mediated by several mechanisms that follow different pathways; for example, O'Shea and Boyd have found that VPI can be mobilized by the generalized transducing phage CP-T1 (43); however, the main mechanism accounting for VPI transmission probably has not been discovered yet. Whatever the mechanism, VPI, carrying the CTX receptor, also has the ability to move horizontally between bacterial populations, providing CTX with the advantage of amplifying its host range when VPI moves toward new TCP-negative strains.

An evolutionary model for the origin of pathogenic V. cholerae has been proposed in which this bacterium first acquired the tcp operon and then TCP-producing strains were infected and lysogenized by CTX (2, 11, 17, 18, 49). However, this model has been impugned by the isolation of several strains of V. cholerae (both O1 and non-O1) that lack TCP genes but contain the CTX prophage (20, 45). It has been suggested that such strains arose by the mentioned model with a subsequent loss of the VPI (17, 18). Another possibility is that such strains have alternative CTX receptors (2, 3), but filamentous phages that use more than one receptor have not been described. However, CTX can infect V. cholerae in a TCP-independent fashion that requires the TolQ, TolR, and TolA proteins, but the efficiency of infection by this mechanism is quite low and needs direct cell-cell contact (23). Boyd and Waldor demonstrated that a specialized receptor such as TCP is not always essential for acquisition of CTX, since these authors showed that V. cholerae generalized transducing bacteriophage CP-T1 can transfer the whole CTX genome toward TCP-negative strains of V. cholerae (3). However, the presence of TCP-devoid, non-O1, non-O139 strains of V. cholerae that contain CTX prophages cannot be explained by this mechanism, since CP-T1 only infects strains belonging to the O1 serogroup (21).

We recently described a V. cholerae-specific filamentous phage, VGJ, which infects host cells through the mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin (MSHA) pilus and that is able to integrate its genome at the same attB chromosomal site as CTX (5). We describe here a new type of specialized transduction mediated by VGJ through which CTX and its satellite phage RS1 are transmitted to new hosts in a TCP-independent fashion. We also discuss the potential implications of this alternative mechanism for the emergence of new toxigenic serotypes of V. cholerae and for the development of an environmentally safer live attenuated cholera vaccine.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Phages, strains, and media. Bacterial strains and phages used in the present study are described in Table 1. Ordinarily, strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium at 37°C. Kanamycin was added, when necessary, at 50 µg/ml. The expression of MshA and TcpA proteins was analyzed in the following media: LB medium (pH 6.5), LB medium (pH 7.0), AKI medium (29), tryptone soy broth (TSB), TSB plus 2.5 g of glucose/liter (TSB_G), Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM; Sigma), and protein-free hybridoma medium (PFHM; Gibco-BRL).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 1. V. cholerae strains and phages used in this study and susceptibility of V. cholerae strains to phages VGJ-Kn, HybP-Kn, and CTX-Kn

DNA methods. Total DNA was prepared according to the method of Ausubel et al. (1). Plasmid DNA was prepared by using the WizardPlus SV System (Promega). DNA restriction and modification enzymes were used according to the manufacturer's instructions (Promega). Southern blot analyses were performed with the following digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled probes: a 643-bp fragment containing part of ctxAB genes amplified by PCR with the primer pairs 5'-ATGATCATGCAAGAGGAACTC-3' and 5'-AGGTGTTCCATGTGCATATGC-3' was used as the ctxAB-specific probe; the 954-bp SacI-EcoRI fragment of VGJ RF, containing open reading frame 81 (ORF81), ORF44, ORF29, and part of ORF493, was used as the VGJ-specific probe (see the genome sequence of VGJ; GenBank no. AY242528); the 564-bp SacI-SphI fragment containing the rstC gene from plasmid pURS1 (4) was used as the rstC-specific probe; and, finally, the 2.9-kb EcoRI-PstI fragment containing the RS1 element from pURS1 (4) was used as the RS-specific probe.

Strand-specific probes were generated by asymmetric PCR with HybP-Kn RF as the template. Primer CTB1 (5'-GCGATTGAAAGGATGAAGG-3'), hybridizing with the negative strand of CTX and inside ctxB, was used to generate strand-specific HybP-A probe and primer NJ2 (5'-TAGAACGTGTCATTGCATCG-3'), hybridizing with the negative strand of VGJ and inside ORF136 (AY242528), was used to generate the complementary strand HybP-B probe. Nucleotides were added at the following final concentrations: 100 µM dATP, 100 µM dCTP, 100 µM dGTP, 65 µM dTTP, and 35 µM DIG-dUTP. Amplification reactions were performed with the Taq bead hot-start polymerase system (Promega).

Sequences of the novel junctions between CTX and VGJ in HybP-Kn were obtained by sequencing its replicative form (RF) with primers CTB1 (see above) for the junction att-CTX/VGJ and NJ4 (5'-CCTGTAGAAATTCCGTCTCC-3'), hybridizing inside the intergenic region I of CTX for the junction att-VGJ/CTX. Similarly, the sequence of the novel junctions between VGJ and RS1 in HybRS-Kn was obtained by sequencing its RF with the primers NJ5 (5'-CGCTCATCAGGTTCAAAACC-3') for the att-RS1/VGJ junction and NJ4 for the att-VGJ/RS1 junction. Sequencing reactions were performed with the Thermo Sequenase CyS dye terminator kit and an ALFexpress DNA sequencer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Stability of HybP-Kn in the bacterial host. To evaluate the in vitro stability of HybP-Kn, V. cholerae 1333 infected with this phage [1333(HybP-Kn)] was inoculated into LB medium and grown without kanamycin selection until late stationary phase. The ratio of infected cells (Kn^r) to the total number of bacteria was determined every 2 h for 24 h. At this time, the integrity of HybP-Kn RF was studied by restriction analysis of plasmid DNA preparations from 12 independent Kn^r clones.

The in vivo stability of replicating or integrated HybP-Kn was evaluated in BALB/c suckling mice. Ten mice were orogastrically inoculated with 10⁶ cells of 1333(HybP-Kn) or 1333-HybI2 (an integrant of HybP-Kn in 1333) and then incubated 24 h at 30°C without their mothers. The mice were then sacrificed; the small intestines were homogenized to recover colonizing vibrios, and the ratio of Kn^r cells to the total number of bacteria was determined.

Quantification of CT production. The ability of 1333(HybP-Kn) and 1333-HybI2 to produce CT was determined in AKI (29) and LB media by the G_M1 ganglioside-dependent enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (G_M1-ELISA) (24) by using a standard curve of purified CT and the anti-CTA monoclonal antibody (MAb) 1G10G5.

Virulence evaluation of the HybP-Kn lysogen 1333-HybI2. Toxicity was evaluated by orogastric inoculation of groups of 15 BALB/c suckling mice with 10⁶ cells of the strains 1333-HybI2, 1333 (negative control), and C6706 (positive control) diluted in 50 µl of phosphate-buffered saline. Mice were fasted 4 h before and after inoculation and incubated for 6 days with their mothers. The survival was monitored daily during this lapse.

Protein methods. To determine the protein composition of the hybrid phage capsids, samples of HybP-Kn (10⁸ particles), HybRS-Kn (10⁸ particles), or VGJ as control (10⁹ particles) were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and Western blotting (1) with the MAb 2H1H9 specific for the major capsid protein of VGJ phage.

Expression of MshA and TcpA protein subunits was studied by growing the strains of interest in LB medium (pH 6.5, 30°C), LB medium (pH 7.0, 37°C), TSB (37°C), or TSB_G (37°C) with overnight shaking (240 rpm) and by the AKI procedure (29). For growth in DMEM or PFHM, starting suspensions of 10⁶ bacteria/ml in each medium were incubated for 8 h static at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO₂. Whole-cell lysates containing 2 x 10⁷ bacteria grown in each condition were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot with the anti-TcpA MAb 10E10E1 and the anti-MshA MAb 2F12F1 (15).

The nucleotide sequences of the novel junctions attCTX/VGJ, attVGJ/CTX, attRS1/VGJ, and attVGJ/RS1 have been deposited in the GenBank database under the accession numbers AY268047, AY268048, AY349613, and AY349614, respectively.

	RESULTS

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
CTX transmission mediated by VGJ. The filamentous phage VGJ, recently isolated from the O139 V. cholerae strain SG25-1, enters the cell using as receptor the MSHA (5), a type IV pilus that also confers hemagglutinating capacity to cholera vibrios (22). VGJ integrates at the same chromosomal attB site as CTX, and the 17-bp functional core within the attP sites of both phages are almost identical (5). Thus, we hypothesized that since both phage RFs integrate at the same attB site, they could potentially integrate into each other by their respective attP sites if they coexisted in the same cell and that, if such a cointegrate were formed, it could be transduced into a new host cell and disseminated thereafter.

To test this hypothesis, 569B was infected with VGJ, CTX-Kn, or coinfected with both phages. The coinfected cells were grown under kanamycin selection to warrant the permanency of CTX-Kn, whereas VGJ was self-maintained because it is a very prolific phage and its receptor, MSHA, is constitutively expressed in 569B (see below). Infection assays were done with cell-free culture supernatants of the classical biotype strain 569B infected with VGJ or CTX-Kn or coinfected with both phages and by using as receptor strains the TCP mutant KHT52 (48), the isogenic MSHA mutant KHT46 (48), their parental strain C6706, the vaccine strain Peru-15, and the classical biotype strain 569B; the last three strains express both TCP and MSHA (Table 2). As expected, 569B infected with CTX-Kn transmitted this phage only to TCP-expressing strains not restricted by phage immunity (only to 569B and Peru-15 receptors in Table 2). Although KHT46 and C6706 strains expressed TCP, they were resistant to CTX because they contain CTX and RS1 prophages expressing RstR^{El Tor} repressor, which confers immunity to CTX^{El Tor} infection (36). 569B infected with VGJ was able to transmit this phage to all strains, except the MSHA mutant KHT46, but this event of transfer never provided Kn^r to the transductants (Table 2). However, 569B coinfected with CTX-Kn and VGJ transduced the Kn^r gene to all MSHA-expressing strains (KHT52, C6706, Peru-15, and 569B in Table 2). Thus, the Kn^r gene originally carried by CTX-Kn was transduced to the TCP mutant KHT52 with great efficiency, acquiring the pattern of transmission of VGJ. Since KHT52 cannot produce TCP (the receptor of CTX-Kn), but normally assembles MSHA pilus (the receptor of VGJ), the appearance of KHT52 Kn^r transductants could only be explained by some kind of interaction between VGJ and CTX-Kn.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 2. Transduction of CTX-Kn and RS1-Kn to different V. cholerae strains

Restriction analysis of pHybP-Kn produced bands characteristic of CTX or VGJ and new bands corresponding to the novel junctions between both phage DNAs (Fig. 1AI). In addition, pHybP-Kn hybridized with VGJ- and CTX-specific probes in Southern blots (Fig. 1AII and III), indicating that this molecule contained sequences from both phages. These results were absolutely compatible with the theoretic cointegrate structure of pHybP-Kn derived from our initial hypothesis in which the RFs of VGJ and CTX-Kn recombined site specifically through their respective attP sites (Fig. 1B). Finally, DNA sequencing of the novel junctions of pHybP-Kn confirmed our hypothesis and showed that the genome of both phages were opposite in the hybrid RF (Fig. 1C).

View larger version (50K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1. Analysis of HybP-Kn and HybRS-Kn RF structure. (A) Restriction and Southern analysis of HybP-Kn RF. In subpanel I, DNA samples of HybP-Kn RF digested with HindIII (lane 1), EcoRI (lane 2), XhoI (lane 3), EcoRI-BglII (lane 4), and appropriate molecular size markers (lane 5) were electrophoresed in 0.8% agarose gels. In subpanels II and III are shown Southern blot analyses with the ctxAB- and VGJ-specific probes represented in panel B. The lanes are the same as in subpanel I, except for lane 5, which was loaded with VGJ RF DNA in subpanel II or with CTX-Kn RF DNA in subpanel III as negative controls. (B) Structure of pHybP-Kn. The genes of CTX are represented in white, the genes of VGJ are represented in gray, and the Knr gene is represented in black. The enzymes and probes used to determine pHybP-Kn structure by restriction and Southern in panel A are shown. The novel junctions between phage DNAs, att-VGJ/CTX and att-CTX/VGJ, are also represented. Notice that the VGJ and CTX genomes are opposite. (C) Nucleotide sequences of attP sites of CTX and VGJ before site-specific recombination and sequences of the novel junctions after recombination, as determined by DNA sequencing. The core sequences of homology are shown in uppercase, with identities boxed. DNA sequences of CTX or VGJ origin are shown in gray or black, respectively, or in white over black for sequences of undetermined origin at the moment of recombination (5). A double-headed arrow delimits the region where the cut and rejoining of the recombination partners took place. (D, E, and F) The same analyses as in panels A, B, and C, respectively, but for HybRS-Kn. In DIII (lane 5) the negative control loaded was RS1-Kn RF DNA.

RS1 transmission mediated by VGJ. The RF of the satellite phage RS1 contains an attP site nearly identical to that of CTX; we therefore evaluated whether VGJ could also transmit the satellite phage RS1 according to the same procedure described above to assess CTX transmission. Thus, RS1-Kn was used in place of CTX-Kn to coinfect strain 569B, together with VGJ (Table 2). As occurred with CTX-Kn, RS1-Kn was efficiently transmitted to the TCP mutant KHT52 (Table 2), suggesting that a hybrid phage was also formed by recombination between RS1 and VGJ RFs. Here again, the analysis of several KHT52 transductants by restriction and Southern blotting (not shown) confirmed that the RFs of RS1-Kn and VGJ had recombined site specifically to form a hybrid RF designated pHybRS-Kn, which generated an ssDNA hybrid genome that was packaged and exported in a phage particle designated HybRS-Kn. The analysis of one representative clone of pHybRS-Kn purified from KHT46 (as described above for pHybP-Kn) is shown in Fig. 1D. Sequencing of the novel junctions between RS1 and VGJ DNAs (Fig. 1F) confirmed the structure of HybRS-Kn RF and that RS1 and VGJ DNAs were opposite in the hybrid molecule (Fig. 1E).

VGJ-dependent transmission of CTX and RS1 from their lysogenic state. Since the initial source of HybP-Kn (and HybRS-Kn) was 569B coinfected with both CTX-Kn (or RS1-Kn) and VGJ, where both phages were replicating, we studied HybP-Kn and HybRS-Kn production from El Tor strains with resident Kn^r-labeled CTX or RS1 prophages after infection with VGJ. Thus, we used strains C72K7 and N16K38, which normally produce CTX-Kn and RS1-Kn particles, respectively, from the resident prophages (Fig. 2). When these strains were infected with VGJ, they detectably produced HybP-Kn or HybRS-Kn, albeit with significantly reduced titers (Table 2). However, once the few HybP-Kn or HybRS-Kn particles produced by these strains infected another receptor like KHT52, they could replicate and produce large amounts of hybrid phage particles (10⁷ particles/ml/OD unit) from the new host.

View larger version (32K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 2. Schematic representation of hybrid phages HybP-Kn and HybRS-Kn formation in V. cholerae El Tor strains. (A) Production of the hybrid phage HybP-Kn in the El Tor strain C72K7 infected with VGJ. Extrachromosomal CTX RF is generated by replication from the chromosome (RFC) by a process dependent on the presence of replication origins (dots) in tandem (40), and then CTX and VGJ RFs recombined site specifically through their respective attP sites (solid arrowheads) to produce HybP-Kn RF, which generates hybrid phage HybP-Kn particles. Only hybrid particles can transduce the Knr trait (solid box) by using the MSHA receptor. (B) Production of the hybrid phage HybRS-Kn in the El Tor strain N16K38 infected with VGJ by the same mechanism described in panel A for HybP-Kn. Again, only HybRS-Kn hybrid particles transduce the Knr trait through the MSHA.

DNA and protein composition of HybP-Kn and HybRS-Kn particles.

View larger version (33K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 3. Analysis of DNA and protein composition of HybP-Kn. (A) Schematic representation of the construction of HybP-A and HybP-B strand-specific probes by asymmetric PCR with HybP-Kn RF as a template and the primers CTB1 and NJ2 (represented by dots). VGJ and CTX DNAs are represented in gray and black, respectively, connected by their respective attP sites. (B) Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA from HybP-Kn particles with strand-specific probes. Lanes: 1, HybP-Kn RF linearized with SphI; 2, genomic DNA (positive strand) of VGJ as a control; 3, genomic ssDNA of phage HybP-Kn. As expected, both strand-specific probes hybridized with the RF of HybP-Kn, from where they were generated, but only HybP-A probe hybridized with the ssDNA genome extracted from VGJ or HybP-Kn particles. (C) Structure of the ssDNA genome of HybP-Kn deduced from the Southern results, showing that it is composed of the positive strand of VGJ and the negative strand of CTX. (D) Western blot analysis with MAb 2H1H9 specific for the major capsid protein of VGJ. Lanes: 1, VGJ (109 particles); 2, HybP-Kn (108 particles); 3, HybRS-Kn (108 particles).

Stability of HybP-Kn. The time course stability and structural integrity of HybP-Kn studied during in vitro growth of 1333(HybP-Kn), in the absence of kanamycin selection, demonstrated that HybP-Kn preserved the same recombinant structure and remained present in about one-third of the bacterial population until the late stationary phase (24 h) (not shown).

Colonization of 1333(HybP-Kn) in the suckling mice intestines also supported the permanency of HybP-Kn in a similar fraction of the bacterial population at 24 h of colonization but, in contrast to the in vitro condition, the in vivo conditions promoted site-specific integration of pHybP-Kn into an as-yet-unidentified chromosomal site different from the integration site of VGJ, as revealed by the unique Southern blot banding pattern in a significant number of clones tested (see the analysis of one representative clone in Fig. 4). One of these in vivo isolated Kn^r clones, 1333-HybI2, extensively cultured in vitro and in vivo showed that all vibrios in the bacterial population retained the Kn^r trait. Southern blot analysis of 10 clones isolated from both culture conditions revealed the same original prophage structure of 1333-HybI2 (not shown).

View larger version (38K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 4. Site-specific integration of HybP-Kn into a chromosomal site different from the attRS1. Southern blot analysis of total DNAs of 1333 (lane 1), 1333-HybI2 (lane 2), and HybP-Kn RF DNA (lane 3) digested with BglII and hybridized with ctxAB (left)- and RS1 (right)-specific probes. The "J" denotes bands containing the novel junctions of HybP-Kn with the chromosome, and "L" denotes the linearized RF. Note that in the right panel the RS1-specific bands, belonging to the RS1 prophage contained in 1333's chromosome (lane 1) remain identical in 1333-HybI2 after integration of HybP-Kn (lane 2), indicating that integration occurred by a different locus.

Expression of CT genes transduced by HybP-Kn. 1333(HybP-Kn) and 1333-HybI2 cultured in AKI medium produced 80 to 90 ng of CT/ml as measured by G_M1-ELISA. This amount is similar to the CT levels produced by its toxigenic progenitor C6706 in similar condition but contrasted with the null production of CT by the attenuated vaccine strain 1333. Thus, ctxAB genes are actively expressing CT from the replicating and lysogenic state of HybP-Kn in the AKI condition. Curiously, when CT production was measured in LB medium, 1333(HybP-Kn) produced 60 to 70 ng of CT/ml; however, 1333-HybI2, as well as the control parental strain C6706, did not produce CT under this condition. Thus, CT expression from HybP-Kn behaved in a different manner when HybP-Kn DNA was in the replicative or integrated state showing the same pattern of CT expression from CTX (38). These results suggest that ctxAB genes are not under the control of the ToxR regulon when HybP-Kn is in the replicative state but that they are regulated by this regulatory system when HybP-Kn is integrated.

HybP-Kn mediates virulence conversion. As expected, attenuated strain 1333 was not lethal at all to suckling mice; however, strain 1333-HybI2 inoculated orogastrically into suckling mice at a dose of 10⁶ CFU reproduced the toxigenic behavior of the pathogenic parental C6706 in the kinetics of mouse killing (Fig. 5). At day 6 no mice survived inoculation with 1333-HybI2 or C6706 (Fig. 5), indicating that infection and lysogenization with HybP-Kn have full potential for virulence reversion of attenuated vaccine strains such as 1333.

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 5. Time course survival of suckling mice inoculated with 1333, 1333-HybI2, or their parental strain C6706.

HybP-Kn host range.

MshA versus TcpA expression. To compare the in vitro relative expression of HybP-Kn and CTX receptors, we analyzed the expression of their major pilus subunits, MshA and TcpA, in classical, El Tor, and O139 strains under different culture conditions by Western blotting. Although in vitro TcpA expression was detected only in restricted conditions and not in all strains, MshA was expressed at similar levels in all strains and conditions tested (Table 3). These results indicated that MSHA is very likely a more ubiquitously expressed receptor than TCP.

	DISCUSSION

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

This mechanism of specialized transduction constitutes a novel TCP-independent pathway for CTX or RS1 transmission and dissemination. The processes of replication and assembly of HybP and HybRS, as well as their capsid, are essentially those of VGJ; thus, HybP and HybRS also use MSHA as receptor. The MSHA is probably a more available phage receptor than TCP since expression of MshA protein is not restricted to specific growth conditions, as TcpA is, and the MSHA has been found also in non-O1 non-O139 strains of V. cholerae (14). Thus, a hybrid phage such as HybP could have advantage over CTX for transmitting the CT genes under certain conditions, such as those found in the environment. Interestingly, HybP infected all El Tor and O139 strains tested in the present study more efficiently than CTX, even under optimal conditions for TCP expression (Table 1); therefore, phage HybP (containing a CTX^{El Tor} genome) circumvents phage immunity (36), supporting the idea that the replication machinery of VGJ is leading replication of HybP. Although the differences between the efficiency of infection of classical strains with HybP and CTX are less pronounced because these strains are not immune to CTX^{El Tor} (36), these strains were also infected more efficiently by HybP than by CTX-Kn (Table 1), which likely indicates that HybP tranduces CT genes more efficiently than CTX, the ordinary vehicle of these genes, in all conditions tested.

CTX transmission mediated by a VGJ-like phage is a plausible explanation for the occasional emergence of non-O1, non-O139 TCP-devoid toxigenic strains of V. cholerae. It is highly probable that other environmentally circulating V. cholerae filamentous phages can potentially transduce CTX or RS1 by a mechanism similar to the one described here. As a supporting example, phage fs-2 contains a 715-bp fragment that is highly homologous (97% identity) to part of RS1 satellite phage, flanked at one side by an attRS1 (27), strongly suggesting that fs-2 and RS1 recombined once upon their evolutionary history. In addition, it has been recently found that RS1 is transduced by the filamentous phage KSF by an unknown TCP-independent mechanism (19) that perhaps is the same mechanism described in the present study. More recently, we isolated another related filamentous phage, designated VEJ, from the V. cholerae O139 strain MO45, which is also able to transmit CTX by the mechanism described here mediated by VGJ (results not shown). Phages such as VGJ and VEJ seem to be relatively abundant in strains of the O139 serogroup of V. cholerae, since other related filamentous phages have been isolated from strains of this serogroup, such as VSK, fs1, and 493 (30, 31, 32, 42).

Consequently, in Fig. 6 we propose an evolutionary model that could explain the origin of new virulent strains from nontoxigenic environmental strains of V. cholerae or from another related bacterial species. Acquisition of CTX phage by a nontoxigenic V. cholerae strain does not automatically create a new pathogen since other factors besides CT are needed for manifestation of the full virulence phenotype (12, 13, 37). Among these factors are TCP, which allows virulent strains to colonize the human small intestine (47), and the lipopolysaccharide, since only two serogroups of V. cholerae (O1 and O139) are known to cause epidemic cholera (7, 28). Therefore, for a phage such as HybP to convert a nontoxigenic V. cholerae strain into a full pathogen it is necessary that the phage infect a host cell with adequate virulence factors. One possibility is that these hybrid phages infect V. cholerae strains (non-O1, non-O139) which do not contain CT encoding genes but which contain VPI and thereby the TCP gene cluster and toxT gene, whose product is needed to activate TCP and CT expression. Although, they are not the rule, such strains have been isolated, including some with new variant alleles of toxT and tcpA (6, 20, 41). If such strains additionally have the MSHA gene cluster, they could express this pilus in a broader number of conditions than TCP, giving advantage to a phage such as HybP over CTX to infect them. Also, the possibility that a phage such as HybP infects V. cholerae strains with other unknown virulence attributes, such as a colonization factor different from TCP cannot be absolutely excluded. Furthermore, another possibility for the emergence of new pathogens is that HybP-like phages infect other bacterial species expressing MSHA homologous pili where the hybrid phage could integrate and express CT. The homology between the putative adsorption proteins of phages VGJ and Vf33, which infects the enteropathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus, suggests that this bacterium species expresses a pilus homologous to MSHA; in fact, VGJ seems to be more related to Vf33 than to other V. cholerae phages such as CTX or fs2 (5).

View larger version (36K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 6. Speculative model for the emerging of new pathogens from V. cholerae (non-O1, non-O139), or another bacterium species, mediated by a phage such as VGJ. (A) A VGJ-like phage infects a toxigenic strain of V. cholerae through MSHA pilus. (B) Incoming RF of this phage site specifically recombines with CTX RF, producing a hybrid genome, which is packaged and exported in hybrid phage particles such as HybP. (C and D) Hybrid particles eventually encountered, infected, and integrated their hybrid genome into the chromosome of an MSHA+ nontoxigenic strain of V. cholerae or into another related host species expressing an MSHA homologous pilus (C) to produce a new genetically stable toxigenic strain (D). The nontoxigenic V. cholerae receptor could be a VPI+ strain, expressing MSHA but not TCP in the environment conditions, such as live attenuated vaccine strains. Although not represented, the inverse situation in which CTX infects V. cholerae with a resident phage such as VGJ would also originate a hybrid phage such as HybP. CTX phage, its RF, and its receptor (TCP) are represented in white; VGJ phage, its RF, and its receptor (MSHA) are represented in gray; and HybP phage and its RF are represented in gray and white. Chr, bacterial chromosome; RFC, replication from the chromosome; Int., integration; CTXpro, CTX prophage; VGJpro, VGJ prophage.

The present study emphasizes the importance and versatility of horizontal gene transfer mechanisms for the evolution of bacterial pathogens. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the transmission of one filamentous phage genome by another filamentous phage, which constitutes an example of how mobile genetic elements can subtly interact to expand the pathways for gene transfer. This finding should lead to future studies about the interaction between filamentous phages in particular and between mobile genetic elements in general for horizontal gene transfer in bacteria.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
We thank Richard A. Finkelstein for providing many of the V. cholerae strains used in this study, Ronald K. Taylor for providing KHT46 and KHT52 mutant strains, G. B. Nair for strains CRC262 and CRC266, Risset Silvera for technical assistance, and Aminael Sánchez for technical assistance and critical review of the manuscript.

	FOOTNOTES

 
* Corresponding author: Mailing address: Departamento de Genética, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas, AP 6412, Havana, Cuba. Phone: (537) 2718066. Fax: (537) 2080497. E-mail: javier{at}biocnic.cneuro.edu.cu.

	REFERENCES

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith., and K. Struhl. 1995. Short protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
2. Boyd, E. F., B. M. Davis, and B. Hochhut.2001 . Bacteriophage-bacteriophage interactions in the evolution of pathogenic bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 9:137-144.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Boyd, E. F., and M. K. Waldor. 1999. Alternative mechanism of cholera toxin acquisition by Vibrio cholerae: generalized transduction of CTX by bacteriophage CP-T1. Infect. Immun. 67:5898-5905.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Campos, J., R. Fando, A. Silva, B. L. Rodriguez, and J. A. Benitez. 1998. Replicating function of the RS1 element associated with Vibrio cholerae CTX prophage.FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 164:141-147.[Medline]
5. Campos, J., E. Martínez, E. Suzarte, B. L. Rodríguez, K. Marrero, T. Ledón, R. Del Sol, and R. Fando.2003 . VGJ, a novel filamentous phage of Vibrio cholerae, integrates into the same chromosomal site as CTX. J. Bacteriol. 185:5685-5686.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Chakraborty, S., A. K. Mukhopadhyay, R. K. Bhadra, A. N. Ghosh, R. Mitra, T. Shimada, S. Yamasaki, S. M. Faruque, Y. Takeda, R. R. Colwell, and G. B. Nair.2000 . Virulence genes in environmental strains of Vibrio cholerae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:4022-4028.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Chitnis, D. S., K. D. Sharma, and R. S. Kamat.1982 . Role of somatic antigen of Vibrio cholerae in adhesion to intestinal mucosa. J. Med. Microbiol. 15:53-61.[Abstract]
8. Davis, B. M., H. H. Kimsey, W. Chang, and M. K. Waldor. 1999. The Vibrio cholerae O139 Calcutta bacteriophage CTX is infectious and encodes a novel repressor. J. Bacteriol. 181:6779-6787.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Davis, B. M., H. H. Kimsey, A. V. Kane, and M. K. Waldor. 2002. A satellite phage-encoded antirepressor induces repressor aggregation and cholera toxin gene transfer. EMBO J. 21:4240-4249.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Davis, B. M., K. E. Moyer, E. F. Boyd, and M. K. Waldor. 2000. CTX prophages in classical biotype Vibrio cholerae: functional phage genes but dysfunctional phage genomes. J. Bacteriol. 182:6992-6998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Davis, B. M., and M. K. Waldor. 2003. Filamentous phages linked to virulence of Vibrio cholerae.Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6:35-42.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. DiRita, V. J., N. C. Engleberg, A. Heath, A. Miller, J. A. Crawford, and R. Yu. 2000. Virulence gene regulation inside and outside. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 355:657-665.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. DiRita, V. J., C. Parsot, G. Jander, and J. J. Mekalanos. 1991. Regulatory cascade controls virulence in Vibrio cholerae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:5403-5407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Ehara, M., S. Shimodori, F. Kojima, Y. Ichinose, T. Hirayama, M. J. Albert, K. Supawat, Y. Honma, M. Iwanaga, and K. Amako.1997 . Characterization of filamentous phages of Vibrio cholerae O139 and O1. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 154:293-301.[Medline]
15. Falero, G., B. L. Rodriguez, T. Valmaseda, M. E. Perez, J. L. Perez, R. Fando, A. Robert, J. Campos, A. Silva, G. Sierra, and J. A. Benitez. 1998. Production and characterization of a monoclonal antibody against mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin of Vibrio cholerae. Hybridoma 17:63-67.[Medline]
16. Faruque, A. S., J. Zhu, Asadulghani, M. Kamruzzaman, and J. J. Mekalanos. 2003. Examination of diverse toxin-coregulated pilus-positive Vibrio cholerae strains fails to demonstrate evidence for Vibrio pathogenicity island phage.Infect. Immun. 71:2993-2999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Faruque, S. M., M. J. Albert, and J. J. Mekalanos. 1998. Epidemiology, genetics, and ecology of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:1301-1314.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Faruque, S. M., Asadulghani, M. N. Saha, A. R. Alim, M. J. Albert, K. M. Islam, and J. J. Mekalanos. 1998. Analysis of clinical and environmental strains of nontoxigenic Vibrio cholerae for susceptibility to CTX: molecular basis for origination of new strains with epidemic potential. Infect. Immun. 66:5819-5825.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Faruque, S. M., M. Kamruzzaman, Asadulghani, D. A. Sack, J. J. Mekalanos, and G. B. Nair.2003 . CTX-independent production of the RS1 satellite phage by Vibrio cholerae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:1280-1285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Ghosh, C., R. K. Nandy, S. K. Dasgupta, G. B. Nair, R. H. Hall, and A. C. Ghose.1997 . A search for cholera toxin (CT), toxin coregulated pilus (TCP), the regulatory element ToxR and other virulence factors in non-O1/non-O139 Vibrio cholerae. Microb. Pathog. 22:199-208.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Guidolin, A., and P. A. Manning. 1985. Bacteriophage CP-T1 of Vibrio cholerae: identification of the cell surface receptor. Eur. J. Biochem. 153:89-94.[Medline]
22. Hanne, L. F., and R. A. Finkelstein.1982 . Characterization and distribution of the hemagglutinins produced by Vibrio cholerae. Infect. Immun. 36:209-214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Heilpern, A. J., and M. K. Waldor. 2000. CTX infection of Vibrio cholerae requires the tolQRA gene products. J. Bacteriol. 182:1739-1747.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Holmgren, J. 1973. Comparison of the tissue receptors for Vibrio cholerae and Escherichia coli enterotoxins by means of gangliosides and natural cholera toxoid. Infect. Immun. 8:851-859.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Huber, K. E., and M. K. Waldor. 2002. Filamentous phage integration requires the host recombinases XerC and XerD. Nature 417:656-659.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Iida, T., K. Makino, H. Nasu, K. Yokoyama, K. Tagomori, A. Hattori, T. Okuno, H. Shinagawa, and T. Honda. 2002. Filamentous bacteriophages of vibrios are integrated into the dif-like site of the host chromosome. J. Bacteriol. 184:4933-4935.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Ikema, M., and Y. Honma. 1998. A novel filamentous phage, fs-2, of Vibrio cholerae O139. Microbiology 144:1901-1906.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Iredell, J. R., U. H. Stroeher, H. M. Ward, and P. A. Manning. 1998. Lipopolysaccharide O-antigen expression and the effect of its absence on virulence in rfb mutants of Vibrio cholerae O1. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 20:45-54.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Iwanaga, M., and K. Yamamoto. 1985. New medium for the production of cholera toxin by Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor. J. Clin. Microbiol. 22:405-408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Jouravleva, E. A., G. A. McDonald, C. F. Garon, M. Boesman-Finkelstein, and R. A. Finkelstein.1998 . Characterization and possible functions of a new filamentous bacteriophage from Vibrio cholerae O139.Microbiology 144:315-324.[Abstract]
31. Jouravleva, E. A., G. A. McDonald, J. W. Marsh, R. K. Taylor, M. Boesman-Finkelstein, and R. A. Finkelstein. 1998. The Vibrio cholerae mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin is the receptor for a filamentous bacteriophage from V. cholerae O139. Infect. Immun. 66:2535-2539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Kar, S., R. K. Ghosh, A. N. Ghosh, and A. Ghosh.1996 . Integration of the DNA of a novel filamentous bacteriophage VSK from Vibrio cholerae 0139 into the host chromosomal DNA. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 145:17-22.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Karaolis, D. K., J. A. Johnson, C. C. Bailey, E. C. Boedeker, J. B. Kaper, and P. R. Reeves. 1998. A Vibrio cholerae pathogenicity island associated with epidemic and pandemic strains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3134-3139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Karaolis, D. K., S. Somara, D. R. Maneval, Jr., J. A. Johnson, and J. B. Kaper. 1999. A bacteriophage encoding a pathogenicity island, a type-IV pilus and a phage receptor in cholera bacteria. Nature 399:375-379.[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Kenner, J. R., T. S. Coster, D. N. Taylor, A. F. Trofa, M. Barrera-Oro, T. Hyman, J. M. Adams, D. T. Beattie, K. P. Killeen, and D. R. Spriggs. 1995. Peru-15, an improved live attenuated oral vaccine candidate for Vibrio cholerae O1.J. Infect. Dis. 172:1126-1129.[Medline]
36. Kimsey, H. H., and M. K. Waldor. 1998. CTX immunity: application in the development of cholera vaccines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:7035-7039.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Klose, K. E. 2001. Regulation of virulence in Vibrio cholerae. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 291:81-88.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Lazar, S., and M. K. Waldor. 1998. ToxR-independent expression of cholera toxin from the replicative form of CTX.Infect. Immun. 66:394-397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Mekalanos, J. J. 1983. Duplication and amplification of toxin genes in Vibrio cholerae. Cell 35:253-263.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Moyer, K. E., H. H. Kimsey, and M. K. Waldor. 2001. Evidence for a rolling-circle mechanism of phage DNA synthesis from both replicative and integrated forms of CTX. Mol. Microbiol. 41:311-323.[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Mukhopadhyay, A. K., S. Chakraborty, Y. Takeda, G. B. Nair, and D. E. Berg. 2001. Characterization of VPI pathogenicity island and CTX prophage in environmental strains of Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol. 183:4737-4746.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Nakasone, N., Y. Honma, C. Toma, T. Yamashiro, and M. Iwanaga.1998 . Filamentous phage fs1 of Vibrio cholerae O139. Microbiol. Immunol. 42:237-239.[Medline]
43. O'Shea, Y. A., and E. F. Boyd. 2002. Mobilization of the Vibrio pathogenicity island between Vibrio cholerae isolates mediated by CP-T1 generalized transduction. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 214:153-157.[CrossRef][Medline]
44. Pearson, G. D., A. Woods, S. L. Chiang, and J. J. Mekalanos. 1993. CTX genetic element encodes a site-specific recombination system and an intestinal colonization factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:3750-3754.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Said, B., H. R. Smith, S. M. Scotland, and B. Rowe.1995 . Detection and differentiation of the gene for toxin co-regulated pili (tcpA) in Vibrio cholerae non-O1 using the polymerase chain reaction. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 125:205-209.[CrossRef][Medline]
46. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, N.Y.
47. Taylor, R. K., V. L. Miller, D. B. Furlong, and J. J. Mekalanos. 1987. Use of phoA gene fusions to identify a pilus colonization factor coordinately regulated with cholera toxin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:2833-2837.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Thelin, K. H., and R. K. Taylor. 1996. Toxin-coregulated pilus, but not mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin, is required for colonization by Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor biotype and O139 strains. Infect. Immun. 64:2853-2856.[Abstract]
49. Waldor, M. K., and J. J. Mekalanos. 1996. Lysogenic conversion by a filamentous phage encoding cholera toxin.Science 272:1910-1914.[Abstract]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Faruque, S. M., Bin Naser, I., Fujihara, K., Diraphat, P., Chowdhury, N., Kamruzzaman, M., Qadri, F., Yamasaki, S., Ghosh, A. N., Mekalanos, J. J. (2005). Genomic Sequence and Receptor for the Vibrio cholerae Phage KSF-1{Phi}: Evolutionary Divergence among Filamentous Vibriophages Mediating Lateral Gene Transfer. J. Bacteriol. 187: 4095-4103 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF)