Journal of Bacteriology, February 2003, p. 1120-1124, Vol. 185, No. 3
0021-9193/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.3.1120-1124.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8530, Japan
Received 7 August 2002/ Accepted 5 November 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chromosomal circularization in Streptomyces spp. was indicated by detecting a macrorestriction fusion fragment in deletion mutants of Streptomyces lividans (11, 18) and Streptomyces ambofaciens (8). It was finally confirmed in Streptomyces griseus by cloning and sequencing of the fusion junctions of the circularized chromosomes (5). The result suggested that chromosomal circularization occurs by nonhomologous recombination between the deletion ends. On the other hand, Fischer et al. (3) reported that homologous recombination between two sigma factor-like open reading frames (ORFs), which are located on both the left and the right arms, caused chromosomal arm replacement in S. ambofaciens. In addition, Rauland et al. (16) reported that in some of S. lividans mutants only one of the two telomeres was deleted, where generated new ends have not been analyzed.
To study what happens concomitant with telomere deletions in Streptomyces spp. in greater detail, we prepared additional mutants from S. griseus 2247. We report here a new deletion mutant, MM9, wherein homologous recombination between two similar lipoprotein-like ORFs caused chromosomal arm replacement and generated new long terminal inverted repeats (TIRs). Based on the accumulated data, a possible function of TIRs of Streptomyces linear replicons is proposed.
Preparation of new deletion mutants. Spore suspension of S. griseus 2247 (9) was UV irradiated at a dose of 99 to 99.9% killing to obtain new deletion mutants. Surviving colonies were randomly picked and reciprocally cultured in glucose-meat extract-peptone medium (9). Total DNAs were prepared as described previously (4), digested with BamHl, separated by agarose gel electrophoresis, and subjected to Southern hybridization analysis. Hybridization was carried out by using the DIG system (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) overnight at 70°C in standard buffer.
To distinguish deletions at each of the left and right telomeres, we used two different probes that are located outside of TIR-L (probe L, 7.9-kb BamHI fragment) and TIR-R (probe R, 6.2-kb PstI fragment) (Fig. 1A). Among 60 colonies tested, one colony, MM9, showed a positive signal when probe L was used but no signal when probe R was used (Fig. 1B). On the other hand, two colonies did not show any signal by either probe (data not shown). These results suggested that only the right telomere was deleted in MM9, whereas both telomeres were deleted in the two other mutants. Mutant MM9, which shows a bald morphology and normal growth, was chosen for further analysis.
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Restriction maps at the left and right chromosomal ends and the locations of the two hybridization probes, probe L and probe R (A), and Southern hybridization analysis of mutant MM9 (B). Only BamHI (Ba) and PstI (Ps) sites are shown for the left and right ends, respectively, except for the TIR-R, where BamHI sites are also shown. Black circles indicate terminal proteins, and shaded lines indicate TIR regions. The location of the end cosmid 6E12 is also shown. /Hd, DNA digested with HindIII.
|
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Ordered cosmid map at the right chromosomal end of strain 2247 and BamHI restriction map of the deletion end cosmid 10E12 (A) and Southern hybridization analysis of mutant MM9 (B) and the cosmids 10E12 and F2B4 (C). The deleted region in MM9 is indicated by a broken line. Ba, BamHI; Ec*, EcoRI in the vector.
|
Lipoprotein-like ORFs involved in chromosomal arm replacement. Next, we studied how the 6.6-kb BamHI fusion fragment was generated. All of the ordered cosmids covering both the left and the right terminal regions of the 2247 chromosome (10) were digested with BamHI plus EcoRI, separated, and probed by the fusion plasmid p1D4. EcoRI was added to separate an insert from the vector. As a matter of course, cosmid 10E12 at the right deletion end showed a positive signal at 9.0 kb whereas, unexpectedly, cosmid F2B4 in the opposite left arm gave a signal at 3.2 kb (Fig. 2C). This result suggested that homologous DNA regions are present in both the right and the left chromosomal arms. This fact reminded us that homologous recombination between two sigma factor-like ORFs caused chromosomal arm replacement in S. ambofaciens (3).
To test a similar possibility, the homologous region in F2B4 was analyzed and located on the rightmost BamHI-EcoRI fragment of the cosmid, namely, 450 kb from the left chromosomal end. The homologous regions in cosmids, 10E12 and F2B4, and plasmid p1D4 were subcloned and finally sequenced (Fig. 3). Three similar ORFs directing toward inside of the chromosome were found; ORF-L (218 amino acids [aa]) in the left arm, ORF-R (217 aa) in the right arm, and ORF-J (218 aa) at the fusion junction. Three ORFs showed 95.3 to 99.5% nucleotide identities and 94.0 to 99.1% amino acid identities to each other. A homology search of databases identified two similar ORFs in S. coelicolor A3 (2) coding a putative lipoprotein (219 aa, 69.4% identity with ORF-L; accession number AL133424-20) and a putative secreted protein (220 aa, 45.3% identity; accession number AL031182-10). These ORFs are located at 680 kb from the left end and at 163 kb from the right end, respectively, in the S. coelicolor A3 (2) chromosome.
![]() View larger version (69K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the three lipoprotein-like ORFs located on the left and right chromosomal arms in strain 2247 (ORF-L and ORF-R) and on the fusion junction in MM9 (ORF-J). The nucleotides of each ORF are numbered from the start codon to the stop codon. Identical nucleotides are indicated by asterisks between two sequences.
|
Restriction analysis of chromosomal arm replacement. To demonstate further the chromosomal arm replacement, macrorestriction fragments of the 2247 and MM9 DNAs were compared by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Gel samples were prepared as described previously (9), digested with SspI, separated by use of contour-clamped homogeneous electric fields (2), and subjected to Southern hybridization. When cosmid F2B4 (Fig. 4A) was used as a probe, the 2247 DNA showed a 250-kb fragment (the 200-kb fragment on the right arm was not detected because of a short homology between F2B4 and 10E12), whereas the MM9 DNA indicated a 310-kb fusion fragment in addition to the 250-kb fragment (Fig. 4B). When the SspI linking cosmid 16C1 was used, the 2247 DNA gave hybridizing signals at 250 and 270 kb (the left end fragment), whereas the MM9 DNA gave signals at 250, 270, and 310 kb. The signal at 270 kb is stronger than other signals due to the duplication of this end fragment. All of these results support the chromosomal arm replacement in MM9.
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Gross chromosomal structures of strains 2247 and MM9 (A) and Southern hybridization analysis of macrorestriction fragments (B) and extreme end fragments (C). The hatched region in strain 2247 generated the new long TIRs in MM9. A 2% agarose gel was used in panel C in place of the usual 0.7% gel. Al, AluI; Kp, KpnI; Sc, SacI; Ss, SspI; x/Ha, x174 DNA digested with HaeIII.
|
Possible function of TIRs in recombinational DNA repair. In the present study, we obtained a new deletion mutant MM9 by UV irradiation of S. griseus 2247. Restriction and sequencing analysis revealed that homologous recombination between two similar lipoprotein-like ORFs caused chromosomal arm replacement and generated new 450-kb TIRs in place of the original 24-kb TIRs. This is a second example of chromosomal arm replacement like that of S. ambofaciens, wherein homologous recombination of two sigma factor-like ORFs generated two mutants with 480- or 850-kb TIRs in place of the original 210-kb TIRs (3).
Rauland et al. (16) reported that some of S. lividans mutants suffered deletions only at one telomere. Pang et al. (14) also reported similar mutants in Streptomyces hygroscopicus. However, it is difficult to distinguish mutants deleted at one telomere and arm-replaced mutants. From the data presented in those studies, we speculated that both mutants in question were arm-replaced mutants. We found mutant MM9 from 60 survived colonies after UV irradition. Therefore, chromosomal arm replacement is not a rare phenomenon in Streptomyces spp.; namely, two similar ORFs in the left and right arms can cause homologous recombination relatively frequently. If so, homologous recombination between the left and right TIR regions might occur much frequently because their nucleotide sequences are completely identical.
Volff and Altenbuchner (20, 21) proposed that telomere deletions are repaired by recombinational DNA repair based on the fact that recA mutants of S. lividans showed a high level of genetic instability (20). As shown in Fig. 5A, a deletion end may invade an intact replicated chromosome by homologous recombination, reproduce a replication fork, and complete the replication to the end. However, in this case the telomere on the same side is reproduced, and therefore arm replacement does not occur. On the other hand, Fischer et al. (3) suggested that direct homologous recombination between two nonallelic sigma factor-like ORFs in two sister chromosomes caused chromosomal arm replacement because multichromosomes are common in a filamentous mycelium of Streptomyces.
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Interchromosomal (A) and intrachromosomal (B) recombinational DNA repairs, which reproduce an identical telomere and causes chromosomal arm replacement, respectively.
|
While the present study was in review, Qin and Cohen (15) reported that an introduction of deletion into one telomere of the linear plasmid pSLA2 caused repair of the damaged telomere, circularization, and formation of long palindromic linear plasmids. Based on these data, they proposed survival mechanisms for Streptomyces linear replicons after telomere damage.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»