Previous Article
Journal of Bacteriology, April 2003, p. 2387-2391, Vol. 185, No. 7
0021-9193/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.7.2387-2391.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Analysis of the Ferric Citrate Transport Gene Promoter of Escherichia coli
Sabine Enz, Susanne Mahren, Claudia Menzel, and Volkmar Braun*
Mikrobiologie/Membranphysiologie, Universität Tübingen; D-72076 Tübingen, Germany
Received 6 December 2002/
Accepted 2 January 2003

ABSTRACT
FecI, an extracytoplasmic-function

factor, is required for
initiation of transcription of the ferric citrate transport
genes. A mutational analysis of the
fecA promoter revealed that
the nonconserved -10 region and a downstream regulatory element
are important for
fecA promoter activity. However, nucleotide
substitutions in the well-conserved -35 region also have an
effect on the
fecA promoter activity. Titration of FecI suggests
that the FecI-RNA polymerase holoenzyme does not bind strongly
to the downstream regulatory element, which is therefore probably
involved in a subsequent step of transcription initiation.

TEXT
In
Escherichia coli, transcription of the ferric citrate transport
genes
fecABCDE is controlled by a signal transduction mechanism
that starts at the cell surface. (Fe
3+ citrate)
2 binds to the
outer membrane protein FecA and without further transport into
the cell induces transcription of the
fec transport genes (
9,
14). The signal transmitted by FecA loaded with (Fe
3+ citrate)
2 across the outer membrane is transmitted across the cytoplasmic
membrane by FecR, a transmembrane protein (
21,
28) that interacts
with FecA in the periplasm and with the FecI extracytoplasmic-function
(ECF)

factor in the cytoplasm (
7,
8,
18,
24). FecR enables
FecI to bind to the RNA polymerase core enzyme; this complex
then binds to the
fecA promoter to initiate transcription of
the
fec transport genes (
1,
2). The only promoter known to be
recognized by FecI is that of the
fecABCDE operon; no other

factor of
E. coli is endowed with such a narrow promoter specificity
(
17).
ECF
factors belong to a subfamily of the
70 class, based on their sequence conservation and function across bacterial species (3, 10, 16, 20). Comparisons of sequences indicate that the genomes of Caulobacter crescentus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Nitrosomonas europaea, and Streptomyces coelicolor are particularly rich in ECF
factors and contain 13, 19, 22, and 50 predicted ECF
factors, respectively.
factors share four conserved regions which can be further subdivided. Region 4.2 recognizes the -35 element, and region 2.4 recognizes the -10 element of promoter DNA. A bacterial promoter consists of at least about 60 bp spanning the positions -40 to +20 in relation to the +1 start site of transcription (12). A comparison of ECF
factors reveals that the -35 sequence and the spacing but not the sequence between the -35 and -10 regions are well conserved (Table 1) (4, 5, 10, 11, 19, 20, 23, 29). The -10 sequences show less homology (Table 1), which is reflected by the low homology of regions 2.4 in the ECF
factors (16). The characteristic feature of region 2.4 of
70, a set of hydrophobic residues that form an amphipatic
-helix, is not present in the corresponding region of ECF
factors (16). The diversity of the -10 sequences and region 2.4 probably accounts for the coexistence of multiple members of the ECF
-factor subfamily in the same species.
Previously, it was shown that transcription of the
fec transport
genes starts at nucleotide 2741 (
7) of the
fec sequence (
22),
resulting in a polycistronic mRNA (
7). Binding of the FecI RNA
polymerase holoenzyme to a 75-bp DNA fragment (from positions
-61 to +13) was demonstrated by DNA band shift experiments (
2).
The smallest plasmid-encoded DNA fragment studied that inhibited
chromosomal
fec transport gene expression by binding the FecI
RNA polymerase extended from positions -82 to +62. In vitro
transcription by FecI RNA polymerase was shown with a 650-bp
promoter DNA fragment (
2). Footprinting scans revealed that
the Fur repressor protein loaded with Mn
2+ (less prone to oxidation
than Fe
2+) covered 38 nucleotides (from positions -38 to -1)
of the coding strand of the
fecA promoter in which the Fur consensus
sequence was localized (positions -36 to -17) (
7). In addition,
preliminary evidence was obtained for the involvement of the
promoter downstream region for
fecA transcription (
2).
Since the ECF promoters deviate in several respects from the
70 promoters, we examined the contribution of the -35, -10, and the downstream region for transcription of the fecA transport gene. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we constructed single-nucleotide changes in the fecA promoter (Fig. 1). To analyze the effects of the nucleotide substitutions, the mutated and the wild-type fecA promoters were fused to the gfp reporter gene. Plasmid pGFPA' is a derivative of pFPV25 that contains a promoterless gfpmut3 gene (26) fused to the fecA promoter. Each construct was transferred into the fec deletion mutant E. coli AA93 transformed with plasmid pSV66 fecIRA, and the relative fluorescence was assayed in nutrient broth (NB) medium in the presence and absence of ferric citrate. The fluorescence was measured with the FL600 fluorescence reader (Biotek, Bad Friedrichshall, Germany) at an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 530 nm.
Point mutations in the -35 region affect fecA promoter activity.
All mutated
fecA promoters with nucleotide substitutions in
the -35 element (-35 to -30) were less active than the
fecA wild-type promoter, but none decreased
fecA promoter activity
more than threefold (Table
2). Mutations of the most conserved
nucleotides A
-34 and A
-33 reduced the relative fluorescence
no more than to 81 and 69%, respectively, of wild-type activity.
Nucleotide substitutions next to the -35 element from positions
-40 to -36 had a small effect on the activity of the
fecA promoter,
which shows that the putative -35 element with the conserved
sequence GAAAAT begins at position G
-35. Since none of the single
mutations abolished
fecA promoter activity, double mutations
were introduced at a few sites. Combination of the single mutation
G
-35T (57% activity) with T
-30G (41%) or A
-34C (81%) reduced
the activity to 32 and 29%, respectively. The double mutant
C
-32 G
-30 was also less active (21%) than the C
-32 (43%) and
G
-30 (41%) single mutants (Table
2). It appears that nucleotide
substitutions in the -35 region are tolerated to some extent,
which is not unexpected since different ECF

factors bind to
similar -35 regions. A comparable result was obtained with the
sigX promoter of the SigX

factor (
13). However, the finding
that the
crtL promoter of
Myxococcus xanthus to which the CarQ
ECF

factor binds is critically dependent on a pentanucleotide
sequence centered at the -31 position (
19) indicates differences
in the structural requirements of ECF

factor promoters. Upstream
deletions in the
fecA promoter extending to nucleotides -28
and -19 reduced ß-galactosidase activity of a plasmid-encoded
fecA-
lacZ operon fusion to 23 and 25% of wild-type activity,
respectively, whereas a deletion covering the entire promoter
region to +1 completely abolished
fecA-
lacZ transcription (
1).
These data demonstrate that the -35 region can be partially
replaced by other nucleotide sequences. This finding is consistent
with the lack of complete promoter inactivation by the point
mutations.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2. Site-directed mutations introduced at the -35 element (-40 to -25), the -10 element (-18 to -5), and the downstream regulatory elementa
|
Point mutations in the -10 region strongly reduce fecA promoter activity.
To determine the -10 element and its boundaries, single-nucleotide
substitutions were introduced from -18 to -5. The mutated promoters
were analyzed as described above for the -35 region. Mutations
between positions -14 and -9 greatly reduced the activity of
the
fecA promoter (Table
2). Mutant
fecA promoters with the
nucleotide substitutions G
-13T, C
-10A, and T
-9G almost completely
abolished the activity of the
fecA promoter, whereas mutations
at C
-12 strongly reduced
fecA promoter activity. The G
-13T substitution
was replaced by the less extreme C and A substitutions. These
mutants displayed a higher
fecA promoter activity than did T
-13.
The mutations that completely inactivated the
fecA promoter
activity all had extreme nucleotide changes. The high
fecA-
gfp transcription rates of the -17 to -15 mutants define well the
5' boundary of the -10 element, in contrast to the lower transcription
of the -6 to -4 mutants (Table
2), which define less clearly
the 3' boundary. The data strongly indicate that the -10 region
is essential for the activity of the
fecA promoter and agree
with data for SigX promoters and the
crt promoter indicating
that single-nucleotide replacements also abolished promoter
activity.
Point mutations in the region downstream of the fecA transcription start site strongly reduce transcription.
The fecA downstream promoter element plays a critical role, as mutations C+9T and A+11C strongly reduced competition of a fecA promoter DNA fragment with the corresponding wild-type fecA promoter fragment for FecI-induced fecA-lacZ transcription. In addition, the T+7G mutation strongly reduced FecI-mediated binding of RNA polymerase to a 95-bp fecA DNA promoter fragment (2). In this study the level of fecA transcription was not determined. To further support this finding, we constructed by PCR mutagenesis single-nucleotide substitutions between positions +1 and +20. The promoter activity of the mutated downstream fragments was monitored by measuring gfp expression as indicated above. Mutants with the nucleotide substitutions C+9T, G+10T, and A+11C strongly reduced the relative fluorescence, resulting in 5, 1, and 7%, respectively, of wild-type promoter activity (Table 2). The mutation G+10A abolished fecA-gfp transcription as strongly as did G+10T (1% activity), whereas transcription by the G+10C promoter was 54% of wild-type activity (Table 2). Mutations at positions T+8, T+16, and T+20 affected fecA promoter activity much less, ranging between 45 and 66%.
DNA downstream of the transcription start site was shown to be important for other ECF
factor-controlled promoters. DNA from nucleotides +50 to +120 of the crtL promoter is required for promoter activity (19). The DNA downstream of crtL contains an enhancer-like element that remains active when displaced to a site upstream of the promoter. The ECF
factor PvdS is required for transcription of the pyoverdin synthesis genes of P. aeruginosa. For pvdF transcription the smallest fragment retaining promoter activity extended from nucleotides -91 to +34, indicating that a sequence element in the downstream region is required for maximal expression from this promoter (27). However, DNA downstream from the pvdE +1 site to nucleotide +195 did not increase the PvdS-dependent pvdE promoter activity (29). A study of the PvdS-dependent pvdA promoter finds that DNA downstream of the transcription start site is required for promoter activity in P. aeruginosa (15).
In order to relate promoter activity to promoter binding of FecI RNA polymerase, in vivo titration experiments were carried out. An excess of plasmid-encoded wild-type fecA promoter DNA binds the FecI-RNA polymerase complex, resulting in lesser availability of the holoenzyme for transcription of the chromosomal fecB-lacZ operon fusion in E. coli ZI418 (1). Mutations in the -10, -35, and downstream regions were examined. The wild-type fecA promoter and mutant fecA promoters fused to gfp were cloned into the high-copy-number vector pBCSK+. The ß-galactosidase activity of E. coli ZI418 transformed with pBCSK+ and grown in the presence of the inducer (Fe3+ citrate)2 amounted to 325 Miller units (Table 3). ß-Galactosidase activity was reduced to 192 Miller units in cells with plasmid-encoded wild-type fecA promoter. Even though the plasmid-encoded fecA promoter did not completely reduce expression of chromosomal fecB-lacZ, this reduction was taken as 100%, in relation to which the reduction caused by the mutated fecA promoters was determined. The G+10T mutation reduced ß-galactosidase activity only by 63% (Table 3). The T-12G mutation reduced ß-galactosidase activity by 14%, while the A-31C mutation reduced ß-galactosidase activity by 60%. The mutation in the -10 region most strongly impaired binding of the FecI RNA polymerase complex to the plasmid-encoded fecA promoter.
Activity of the wild-type and the mutated
fecA promoter fragments
on the high-copy-number plasmids in ZI418 was determined by
gfp expression (Table
3). Despite the relatively high FecI RNA
polymerase binding ability of the G
+10T promoter mutant (63%),
the induction activity was low (9%) (Table
3). The relative
activities of the promoter mutants on the high-copy-number plasmids
were higher (Table
3) than on the low-copy-number plasmids (Table
2). However, the absolute fluorescence values listed in Table
3 are lower than those listed in Table
2, which may be caused
by the reduced availability of FecI RNA polymerase due to its
binding to the chromosomal
fecA promoter of ZI418, which is
not present in the AA93
fec deletion mutant used for the data
presented in Table
2. Induction levels by (Fe
3+ citrate)
2 via
the wild-type promoter were comparable (10-fold) in the two
E. coli strains.
The results described here confirm and extend previous findings on the importance of the downstream region of the fecA promoter for fec transport gene transcription (2). Since binding of the FecI-RNA polymerase complex to the downstream region did not play a major role, the downstream region may be involved in a subsequent step of transcription initiation. For the initiation process in E. coli the closed RNA polymerase holoenzyme (RPc) turns into an open complex conformation. DNase I footprint assays showed that several E. coli promoters exist in two forms; one form displays protection of the promoter from -55 to -5 (RPc1) against DNase I, and the other displays it from -55 to + 20 (RPc2) (6). Although it is not clear how the conformational changes of RPc1 to RPc2 occur, it seems that the downstream DNA is placed into its binding site (12).
Mutations in the fec-specific -10 region strongly reduce FecI polymerase binding and fecA transcription. FecI RNA polymerase specifically binds to the -10 fecA promoter region, and for this reason mutations in the -10 region reduce promoter activity. This may apply to other ECF
factors for which different -10 regions exist. In contrast, the fecA -35 region tolerates nucleotide replacements.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Monica Ogierman for critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BR 330/19-1).

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Mikrobiologie/Membranphysiologie, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany. Phone: 49 7071 2972096. Fax: 49 7071 295843. E-mail:
volkmar.braun{at}mikrobio.uni-tuebingen.de.


REFERENCES
1 - Angerer, A., and V. Braun. 1998. Iron regulates transcription of the Escherichia coli ferric citrate transport genes directly and through the transcription initiation proteins. Arch. Microbiol. 169:483-490.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Angerer, A., S. Enz, M. Ochs, and V. Braun. 1995. Transcriptional regulation of ferric citrate transport in Escherichia coli K-12. FecI belongs to a new subfamily of
70-type factors that respond to extracytoplasmic stimuli. Mol. Microbiol. 18:163-174.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Brutsche, S., and V. Braun. 1997. SigX of Bacillus subtilis replaces the ECF sigma factor FecI of Escherichia coli and is inhibited by RsiX. Mol. Gen. Genet. 256:416-425.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 - Cao, M., P. A. Kobel, M. M. Morshedi, M. F. Wu, C. Paddon, and J. D. Helmann. 2002. Defining the Bacillus subtilis sigma(W) regulon: a comparative analysis of promoter consensus search, run-off transcription/macroarray analysis (ROMA), and transcriptional profiling approaches. J. Mol. Biol. 316:443-457.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Dartigalongue, C., D. Missiakas, and S. Raina. 2001. Characterization of the Escherichia coli sigma E regulon. J. Biol. Chem. 276:20866-20875.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - deHaseth, P. L., M. L. Zupancic, and M. T. Record, Jr. 1998. RNA polymerase-promoter interactions: the comings and goings of RNA polymerase. J. Bacteriol. 180:3019-3025.[Free Full Text]
7 - Enz, S., V. Braun, and J. H. Crosa. 1995. Transcription of the region encoding the ferric dicitrate transport system in Escherichia coli: similarity between promoters for fecA and for extracytoplasmic function sigma factors. Gene 163:13-18.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 - Enz, S., S. Mahren, U. H. Stroeher, and V. Braun. 2000. Surface signaling in ferric citrate transport gene induction: interaction of the FecA, FecR, and FecI regulatory proteins. J. Bacteriol. 182:637-646.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Härle, C., J. Kim, A. Angerer, and V. Braun. 1995. Signal transfer through three compartments: transcription initiation of the Escherichia coli ferric citrate transport system from the cell surface. EMBO J. 14:1430-1438.[Medline]
10 - Helmann, J. D. 2002. The extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 46:47-110.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Hershberger, C. D., R. W. Ye, M. R. Parsek, Z. D. Xie, and A. M. Chakrabarty. 1995. The algT (algU) gene of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a key regulator involved in alginate biosynthesis, encodes an alternative sigma factor (sigma E). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:7941-7945.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Hsu, L. M. 2002. Open season on RNA polymerase. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:502-504.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 - Huang, X., and J. D. Helmann. 1998. Identification of target promoters for the Bacillus subtilis sigma X factor using a consensus-directed search. J. Mol. Biol. 279:165-173.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Kim, I., A. Stiefel, S. Plantör, A. Angerer, and V. Braun. 1997. Transcription induction of the ferric citrate transport genes via the N-terminus of the FecA outer membrane protein, the Ton system and the electrochemical potential of the cytoplasmic membrane. Mol. Microbiol. 23:333-344.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 - Leoni, L., A. Cervo, N. Orsi, and P. Visca. 1996. Iron-regulated transcription of the pvdA gene in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: effect of Fur and PvdS on promoter activity. J. Bacteriol. 178:2299-2313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - Lonetto, M. A., K. L. Brown, K. E. Rudd, and M. J. Buttner. 1994. Analysis of the Streptomyces coelicolor sigE gene reveals the existence of a subfamily of eubacterial RNA polymerase sigma factors involved in the regulation of extracytoplasmic functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7573-7577.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Maeda, H., M. Jishage, T. Nomura, N. Fujita, and A. Ishihama. 2000. Two extracytoplasmic function sigma subunits, sigma(E) and sigma(FecI), of Escherichia coli: promoter selectivity and intracellular levels. J. Bacteriol. 182:1181-1184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18 - Mahren, S., S. Enz, and V. Braun. 2002. Functional interaction of region 4 of the extracytoplasmic function sigma factor FecI with the cytoplasmic portion of the FecR transmembrane protein of the Escherichia coli ferric citrate transport system. J. Bacteriol. 184:3704-3711.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Martinez-Argudo, I., R. M. Ruiz-Vazquez, and F. J. Murillo. 1998. The structure of an ECF-sigma-dependent, light-inducible promoter from the bacterium Myxococcus xanthus. Mol. Microbiol. 30:883-893.[CrossRef][Medline]
20 - Missiakas, D., and S. Raina. 1998. The extracytoplasmic function sigma factors: role and regulation. Mol. Microbiol. 28:1059-1066.[CrossRef][Medline]
21 - Ochs, M., S. Veitinger, I. Kim, D. Welz, A. Angerer, and V. Braun. 1995. Regulation of citrate-dependent iron transport of Escherichia coli: FecR is required for transcription activation by FecI. Mol. Microbiol. 15:119-132.[Medline]
22 - Pressler, U., H. Staudenmaier, L. Zimmermann, and V. Braun. 1988. Genetics of the iron dicitrate transport system of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 170:2716-2724.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23 - Sexton, R., P. R. Gill, Jr., D. N. Dowling, and F. O'Gara. 1996. Transcriptional regulation of the iron-responsive sigma factor gene pbrA. Mol. Gen. Genet. 250:50-58.[Medline]
24 - Stiefel, A., S. Mahren, M. Ochs, P. Schindler, S. Enz, and V. Braun. 2001. Control of the ferric citrate transport system of Escherichia coli: mutations in region 2.1 of the FecI extracytoplasmic-function sigma factor suppress mutations in the FecR transmembrane protein. J. Bacteriol. 183:162-170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Stover, C. K., X. Q. Pham, A. L. Erwin, S. D. Mizoguchi, P. Warrener, M. J. Hickey, F. S. Brinkman, W. O. Hufnagle, D. J. Kowalik, M. Lagrou, R. L. Garber, L. Goltry, E. Tolentino, S. Westbrock-Wadman, Y. Yuan, L. L. Brody, S. N. Coulter, K. R. Folger, A. Kas, K. Larbig, R. Lim, K. Smith, D. Spencer, G. K. Wong, Z. Wu, and I. T. Paulsen. 2000. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature 406:959-964.[CrossRef][Medline]
26 - Valdivia, R. H., and S. Falkow. 1996. Bacterial genetics by flow cytometry: rapid isolation of Salmonella typhimurium acid-inducible promoters by differential fluorescence induction. Mol. Microbiol. 22:367-378.[CrossRef][Medline]
27 - Visca, P., L. Leoni, M. J. Wilson, and I. L. Lamont. 2002. Iron transport and regulation, cell signalling and genomics: lessons from Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas. Mol. Microbiol. 45:1177-1190.[CrossRef][Medline]
28 - Welz, D., and V. Braun. 1998. Ferric citrate transport of Escherichia coli: functional regions of the FecR transmembrane regulatory protein. J. Bacteriol. 180:2387-2394.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29 - Wilson, M. J., B. J. McMorran, and I. L. Lamont. 2001. Analysis of promoters recognized by PvdS, an extracytoplasmic-function sigma factor protein from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 183:2151-2155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Journal of Bacteriology, April 2003, p. 2387-2391, Vol. 185, No. 7
0021-9193/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.7.2387-2391.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sigdel, T. K., Easton, J. A., Crowder, M. W.
(2006). Transcriptional Response of Escherichia coli to TPEN.. J. Bacteriol.
188: 6709-6713
[Abstract]
[Full Text]