Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, April 2003, p. 2592-2602, Vol. 185, No. 8
0021-9193/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.8.2592-2602.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Clemencia M. Rojas, and Alan Collmer*
Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
Received 30 August 2002/ Accepted 23 January 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
A handful of effector proteins have also been shown to make a detectable contribution to virulence in compatible interactions. For example, AvrRpm1 and AvrRpt2 are able to increase pathogen growth in Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes that do not carry corresponding R genes (7, 14, 35). A deletion of avrPphF in P. syringae pv. phaseolicola leads to the loss of virulence to a range of susceptible bean cultivars (44). Heterologous expression of AvrPto in P. syringae pv. tomato T1 produces an increase in bacterial growth in tomato lacking the pathovar tomato resistance gene (39). Interestingly, the virulence function of effector proteins appears to be context dependent: the phenotype varies depending on the virulence assay, other effectors produced by the strain, and the combinations of bacterial strains and susceptible host plants tested. These observations are consistent with the concept that effectors are horizontally acquired, vary among strains, and may function both redundantly and interdependently.
P. syringae pv. syringae B728a is typical of the species. It is a foliar pathogen and causes bacterial brown spot disease on snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). It is also a common inhabitant of leaf surfaces, on which it can multiply well under adverse environmental conditions, and the buildup of a threshold epiphytic population often precedes disease development in the field (26). The association of P. syringae pv. syringae B728a with leaves thus has two phases, epiphytic and endophytic, and this strain has become a model for investigating the basis for bacterial epiphytic growth and field fitness (18). The Hrp system is one factor contributing to the field fitness of P. syringae pv. syringae B728a on bean plants, as indicated by the reduced population size of hrp/hrc mutants relative to that of the wild type following inoculation onto seeds at the time of planting (17).
In P. syringae, the hrp genes are located on the chromosome in a pathogenicity island with a tripartite structure composed of an exchangeable effector locus (EEL), a cluster of hrp/hrc type III secretion genes, and a conserved effector locus (CEL) (2). The CEL carries several candidate effector genes, and a large deletion in the P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 CEL abolishes pathogenicity (2), which suggests that the CEL might be one of several necessary contributors to pathogenesis. In contrast, the region residing between hrpK and tRNALeu of the Hrp pathogenicity island was given the EEL designation because it contains completely different candidate effector genes in the different strains that were initially investigated (2). Furthermore, the EELs are rich in transposable elements and plasmid-related sequences, and the G+C content of the open reading frames (ORFs) in the EELs is significantly lower than the genomic average of 59% for P. syringae (calculated from the whole genome of pathovar tomato DC3000), which is a hallmark of horizontally transferred genes.
The ORFs in the pathovar tomato DC3000 EEL predict products with no similarity to any known effector proteins; however, deletion of the EEL in pathovar tomato DC3000 partially reduces pathogen fitness in planta, indicating that the ORFs might collectively contribute to parasitism. The strain 61 EEL (2.5 kb) has two ORFs: HopPsyA is an effector protein that has avirulence activity when it is heterologously expressed in P. syringae pv. tabaci cells that are subsequently infiltrated into tobacco leaves (4), and shcA encodes a chaperone that is required for the secretion of HopPsyA (45, 46). The 7.3-kb EEL of P. syringae pv. syringae B728a encodes three putative effector proteins that are homologous to AvrB and AvrC of P. syringae pv. glycinea, AvrPphE of P. syringae pv. phaseolicola 1302A, and AvrRxv of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, respectively (2). The role of AvrB, AvrC, AvrPphE, and AvrRxv in incompatible interactions has been established (8, 41, 43); however, no role in virulence has been demonstrated.
The objectives of this study were (i) to determine if the ORFs in the complex EEL of P. syringae pv. syringae B728a encode proteins that travel the Hrp pathway, have Avr activity, and collectively contribute to virulence and (ii) to explore the range of effector variability in EELs from a larger set of P. syringae pathovars. To achieve the first goal, we assessed the virulence function of the P. syringae pv. syringae B728a EEL through construction of a deletion mutation and we also tested the avirulence activity and Hrp-dependent secretion of the putative effector proteins. To achieve the second goal, we amplified and sequenced the EEL regions from several other P. syringae pathovars. Our results reveal that (i) the effector proteins encoded by the P. syringae pv. syringae B728a EEL are secreted into the bacterial milieu in an Hrp-dependent manner, (ii) heterologous expression of the P. syringae pv. syringae B728a EEL effector genes in P. syringae pv. tabaci confers an avirulence phenotype, (iii) deletion of the P. syringae pv. syringae B728a EEL strongly reduces virulence, and (iv) the sequence of a larger set of EELs from different pathovars reveals both recurring features and additional variations in EEL structure. Based on the secretion results, we renamed three of the P. syringae pv. syringae B728a EEL ORFs HopPsyC, HopPsyE, and HopPsyV (Hrp-dependent outer proteins of P. syringae) following recommendations for uniform designation of P. syringae effectors (3, 47), and we have chosen last-letter designations that evoke founding members of the respective effector families (AvrC, AvrPphE, and AvrRxv).
|
|
|---|
with vectors pBluescript II (Stratagene), pFLAG-CTC (Sigma), pRK415 (23), pCPP46, and pUCP24 (48), according to standard procedures (37). Plasmids were transformed into P. syringae by triparental mating or electroporation under described conditions (6). The Erwinia chrysanthemi type III system, pCPP3042, is a derivative of pCPP2156 (15) that has been improved by the deletion of extraneous sequences flanking the functional hrp/hrc gene cluster; pCPP3127 is an hrcT mutant derivative of pCPP3042 that has an insertion of interposon (
Spr) in hrcT, which is impaired in type III-dependent secretion. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
|
Mutant construction and analysis.
Constructions of mutation and complementing clone are illustrated in Fig. 1. Deletion of the P. syringae pv. syringae B728a EEL was done by subcloning border fragments into restriction sites on either side of an
Spr cassette in pRK415, conjugating the recombinant plasmid into P. syringae pv. syringae B728a, and then selecting and screening for marker exchanged mutants as described (1). The left and right deletion border fragments used (with residual gene fragments indicated) for making CUCPB5111 were tgt-queA-tRNALeu-intA' (117 bp upstream of the ORF6 start codon) and hopPsyC'-hrpK (312 bp of hopPsyC), respectively, which result in a 5,924-bp deletion of hopPsyC to ORF6. Mutant construction was confirmed by Southern hybridization under previously described conditions (6). Complementation was done by subcloning a 10,488-bp XhoI fragment into pCPP46, resulting in pCPP3092, and conjugating the plasmid into CUCPB5111 by triparental mating (20). pCPP46 and derivatives carry a par locus and were confirmed to be stable in P. syringae in planta without antibiotic selection.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Construction of the P. syringae pv. syringae B728a EEL deletion mutation and its corresponding complementation clone. (A) Physical map of the P. syringae pv. syringae B728a EEL. Pointed boxes indicate the predicted ORFs and the direction of transcription, with black triangles representing the presence of an Hrp box promoter. Hatched regions represent mobile genetic elements, and open boxes are putative effector or chaperone genes. (B) EEL deletion mutant CUCPB5111, with the dotted line representing the internal deletion that is replaced by an Spr cassette. (C) The 10,488-bp XhoI fragment shown contains hrpK to tRNALeu in pCPP3092.
|
Isolation and cloning of the EELs from different pathovars of P. syringae. Chromosomal DNA from different P. syringae pathovars was prepared as previously described (37) and was used as templates for isolation of the EELs by PCR. Primers used for PCR amplification, as shown in Table 2, were designed from the conserved sequences of hrpK and tRNALeu or queA. Oligonucleotide primers were purchased from Genosys, Fisher Scientific or Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, Iowa). PCR was performed with 1x PCR buffer, 100 ng of DNA templates, 0.2 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphate, a 0.8 µM concentration of each primer, and 2 U of Taq Plus long polymerase (Stratagene) per 50-µl reaction, in an Eppendorf Mastercycler gradient thermal cycler (Brinkmann Instruments, Westbury, N.Y.) following the listed program: 90°C, 1 min for denaturation; 90°C, 30 s; 55 ± 10°C, 45 s; 72°C, 9 min, 30 cycles for amplification; and 72°C, 10 min for extension. The PCR-amplified DNA fragments were gel purified with the Prep-A-Gene DNA purification system (Bio-Rad) and were cloned into pCR-XL-TOPO vector by the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen). All DNA sequencing was done at the Cornell Biotechnology Center with an automated DNA sequencer, model 373A (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Primers used in this study
|
|
|
|---|
The three genes postulated to encode Hops were cloned into a pFLAG-CTC vector, resulting in pCPP3117 (HopPsyC-FLAG), pCPP3119 (HopPsyE-FLAG), and pCPP3118 (HopPsyV-FLAG). These constructs were transformed into E. coli carrying pCPP3042 (functional E. chrysanthemi hrp/hrc gene cluster) or pCPP3127 (mutant E. chrysanthemi hrp/hrc gene cluster) for secretion assays. HopPsyC-FLAG, HopPsyE-FLAG, and HopPsyV-FLAG were visualized by immunoblotting with anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody and chemiluminescent detection. All three FLAG epitope-tagged proteins were found in the supernatant fractions of E. coli(pCPP3042) but not in those of E. coli(pCPP3127), indicating that all three proteins are secreted in an Hrp-dependent manner (Fig. 2, upper panel). To confirm that the presence of HopPsyC-FLAG, HopPsyE-FLAG, and HopPsyV-FLAG in the E. coli(pCPP3042) milieu resulted from specific secretion and not cell lysis, we simultaneously monitored the localization of tagged proteins and ß-galactosidase, a 116-kDa cytoplasmic protein encoded by the native E. coli lacZ gene. E. coli(pCPP3042) supernatant fractions contained no ß-galactosidase (Fig. 2, bottom panel). Furthermore, Coomassie staining of polyacrylamide gels revealed no evidence of cytoplasmic proteins in the supernatant fractions of either E. coli(pCPP3042) or E. coli(pCPP3127) (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Immunoblot analysis of HopPsyC-FLAG, HopPsyE-FLAG, and HopPsyV-FLAG secretion by E. coli carrying an intact (pCPP3042) or defective (pCPP3127) E. chrysanthemi type III secretion system. The supernatant fraction (S) was concentrated 7.5 times more than the cell-bound fraction (C). The upper panel was immunostained with anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody, and the bottom panel was stained with anti-ß-galactosidase serum.
|
![]() View larger version (60K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Hypersensitive response of tobacco leaves to infiltration with P. syringae pv. tabaci 11528 transformants expressing Hops encoded by the P. syringae pv. syringae B728a EEL. Leaves were inoculated with P. syringae pv. tabaci 11528 harboring pCPP3153 (hopPsyC+), pCPP3154 (hopPsyE+), or pCPP3155 (hopPsyV+). The leaf on the left was infiltrated with 108 CFU ml of inoculum-1, and the one on the right was infiltrated with 105 CFU ml-1. Photographs were taken 1 and 5 days postinfiltration, respectively.
|
Spr cassette (Fig. 1B). This P. syringae mutant, CUCPB5111, was tested for its ability to elicit the HR in tobacco and to cause disease in bean. The mutant retained its ability to elicit the HR in tobacco when it was introduced into the intercellular space of a leaf by syringe infiltration at 108 CFU ml-1. However, in contrast to the wild type, the mutant exhibited no macroscopic necrosis in tobacco when it was infiltrated at 106 CFU ml-1, although the wild-type phenotype could be restored by complementation with pCPP3092 (data not shown). The mutant was also able to produce disease symptoms in bean when it was introduced by syringe infiltration at 104 CFU ml-1. Interestingly, when we changed the inoculation method to dipping, the mutant exhibited reduced growth 3 days postinoculation compared with the wild type (Fig. 4). In addition, the mutant produced delayed and smaller lesions. Plasmid pCPP3092, which carries hrpK through ORF6 (Fig. 1C), restored the growth of CUCPB5111 (Fig. 4) and symptom production (data not shown), indicating that the impaired growth ability of CUCPB5111 is due to the deletion of the EEL.
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Growth of P. syringae pv. syringae B728a, its mutant derivatives CUCPB5102 ( hrcC::nptII) and CUCPB5111 ( EEL:: Spr), and complemented strain CUCPB5111(pCPP3092) in bean leaves. Bacteria were inoculated by (A) infiltration with 104 CFU ml-1 or (B) dipping with 105 CFU ml of inoculum-1. Each point represents the mean and standard error of three samples, and each sample is composed of 10 7-mm leaf disks.
|
The sequences of multiple P. syringae EELs reveal both recurring features and new variations.
By using primers designed from the conserved flanking regions of the EEL, we were able to amplify the loci from several P. syringae pathovars: tomato DC3000, syringae strains B728a and 226, morsprunorum PDDCC 5795, atrofaciens B143, mori PDDCC 4331, angulata Pa9, glycinea race 4, phaseolicola B130, tabaci 11528, and delphinii PDDCC 529. These strains were chosen to represent taxonomically diverse pathovars and hosts. We included pathovars tomato DC3000 and syringae B728a to confirm that the primers and PCR protocols worked properly. The physical maps and detailed information on the EELs from different pathovars are given in Fig. 5 and Table 3. Surprisingly, the candidate effectors in this new set of EELs were similar to previously identified P. syringae effectors (2). Six of the EELs investigated (pathovars angulata, delphinii, syringae B728a, phaseolicola B130, tabaci, and glycinea) have AvrPphE homologs residing between hrpK and tRNALeu, as do two sequences that have been published elsewhere (pathovar tabaci 11528 [41] and pathovar phaseolicola 1302A [29]). The nucleotide sequence of the pathovar mori EEL is highly similar to that of pathovar phaseolica B130; however, there was a nonsense mutation at position 118 (G
T) and a 10-bp insertion between positions 435 and 436 of the AvrPphE-coding region in pathovar mori, which result in a truncated ORF of 120 bp in length. The predicted ORFs in the EELs of pathovar atrofaciens and pathovar syringae 226 encode two proteins similar to ShcA and HopPsyA of the pathovar syringae 61 EEL with 31 and 89% amino acid sequence identities, respectively. The EELs of pathovar morsprunorum and pathovar atrofaciens have 95% nucleotide identity; however, the coding region of the second ORF in the pathovar morsprunorum 5795 EEL is disrupted by a nonsense mutation at position 493 (G
T) (Table 3), resulting in an ORF with 164 amino acids. It is also noteworthy that the gene organization in the EELs of pathovars atrofaciens and morsprunorum is different from that of pathovar syringae strains 61 and 226, as shown in Fig. 5. The former pair has shcA-hopPsyA transcriptionally fused with hrpK, which contrasts with the independent transcriptional unit of the latter ones, which are transcribed opposite to the hrpK operon. In fact, in all the sequenced EELs, the predicted ORF that is immediately downstream of hrpK appears to be in the same transcription unit with hrpK, except for the EELs isolated from pathovar syringae strains 61 and 226 (Fig. 5). In addition to avrPphE, the pathovar delphinii EEL predicts three additional ORFs that share homology with candidate effectors: ORF2 of the pathovar tomato DC3000 EEL (2) and avrPphF1 and avrPphF2 of pathovar phaseolicola strains 1375A and 1449B (44). The percent identity of deduced amino acid sequences to known effector proteins is listed in Table 3.
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Physical maps of the EELs of P. syringae pv. syringae B728a and other strains. Pointed boxes indicate the predicted ORFs and the direction of transcription, black triangles indicate the presence of the Hrp box, and black boxes indicate the position of tRNALeu. Stippled regions are conserved among different pathovars and were used for primer design. Hatched regions represent mobile genetic elements. Open boxes with solid lines are putative effector genes, whereas boxes with dotted lines are apparent pseudogenes.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. P. syringae strains and primers used to isolate the EELs by PCR
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Phylograms of optimal trees of EELs in P. syringae strains based on 250 bp of hrpK (A) and full-length avrPphE (B) sequences. Horizontal branch length is proportional to the estimated number of nucleotide substitutions, and bootstrap probabilities (as percentages) are indicated above or below the internal branches. The trees are rooted at the midpoint. Abbreviations for strains used in the figure follow: Psy, pathovar syringae; Pdp, pathovar delphinii; Pto, pathovar tomato; Pau, pathovar angulata; Pmo, pathovar mori; Pph, pathovar phaseolicola; Pgy, pathovar glycinea. In panel A, strains with EELs encoding ShcA-HopPsyA homologs are shown in shaded boxes. In panel B, the open box indicates that the avrPphE homolog used in phylogenetic analysis is not associated with the EEL.
|
|
|
|---|
Analyses of candidate effectors in the P. syringae pv. syringae B728a EEL and their role in parasitism.
The ORFs in the P. syringae pv. syringae B728a EEL represent a subset of effector genes that appear widespread among P. syringae pathovars. For example, HopPsyC is homologous with AvrB and AvrC, which were identified in soybean pathogen pathovar glycinea as avirulence factors (43). Both avrB and avrC are flanked by repeated DNA sequences (40) and have relatively low G+C content, which are characteristics of horizontally transferred genes. HopPsyV is even more widespread among pathogenic bacteria. It has motifs characteristic of the AvrRxv/YopJ family, whose members are also found in the genera Xanthomonas, Rhizobium, Salmonella, and Yersinia (5, 13, 16, 49). Yersinia YopJ inhibits the host immune response by preventing activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase and NF-
B pathways (32) and has been shown to require a cysteine protease catalytic triad for antihost activity (33). Mutations in the predicted catalytic core of AvrBsT, an AvrRxv homolog from X. campestris pv. campestris, completely abolished the ability of the protein to elicit necrosis when it was transiently expressed in N. benthamiana, suggesting that all members in the AvrRxv family might use a similar catalytic mechanism in bacterial pathogenesis (33).
The P. syringae pv. syringae B728a EEL hopPsyE protein is homologous with avrPphE, which has alleles in representative strains of all known races of pathovar phaseolicola, as well as in P. syringae pathovars tabaci (41), glycinea, angulata, delphinii (Table 3), and tomato DC3000 (http://www.tigr.org/cgi-bin/BlastSearch/blast.cgi?organism=p_syringae) and Ralstonia solanacearum (http://sequence.toulouse.inra.fr/R.solanacearum) (36) and Xanthomonas spp. (http://cancer.lbi.ic.unicamp.br/xanthomonas) (11). Although the pathovar tabaci AvrPphE and P. syringae pv. syringae B728a HopPsyE homologs share 77% amino acid sequence identity, it appears that a corresponding R gene in tobacco (N. tabacum cv. Xanthii) could differentiate these two and confer avirulence to the latter. As explained below, it appears that avrPphE homologs were acquired relatively early in P. syringae evolution and then maintained (with modifications in various strains to evade host R gene surveillance), which suggests that avrPphE plays an important role in bacterial pathogenesis.
Deletion of the EELs in P. syringae pv. syringae B728a and pathovar tomato DC3000 (2) had strikingly different effects on growth in planta. The P. syringae pv. syringae B728a EEL mutant grew poorly when inoculated by dipping, although it grew as well as the wild type when inoculated by infiltration. Because of this observation, we retested pathovar tomato DC3000 and its EEL mutant derivative CUCPB5110 in host tomato by dip inoculation. The bacterial population of the mutant was slightly reduced, which is similar to the previously reported phenotype (2), and no difference was found between the two inoculation methods (data not shown). Thus, the importance of the EEL effectors in P. syringae pv. syringae B728a and pathovar tomato DC3000 seems to be fundamentally different. It is noteworthy that a similarly strong growth penalty was observed with dip-inoculated but not infiltration-inoculated coronatine-deficient mutants of pathovar tomato DC3000 (27). This suggests that the pathovar tomato DC3000 coronatine and pathovar syringae B728a EEL effectors play a critical role in an early stage in pathogenesis that is bypassed when inoculum is infiltrated into leaf intercellular spaces. Whatever the explanation, dip inoculation is an important method in assessing the virulence of effector mutants.
P. syringae pv. syringae strains B728a and 61 differ in their relative growth and virulence in bean, and they differ in the composition of their EELs. The demonstrable importance of the P. syringae pv. syringae B728a EEL raised the possibility that the differing EELs could account for the differing virulence. Therefore, we heterologously expressed the strain B728a EEL in strain 61. However, wild-type strain 61 and strain 61 harboring the strain B728a EEL exhibited similar population dynamics and final population levels in planta, suggesting that there are other factors promoting bacterial growth in bean that must be missing in strain 61.
EELs isolated from different P. syringae pathovars reveal common and novel features. To further explore the potential function of EELs and any significance of effector genes being located there, we analyzed the EELs of nine pathovars of P. syringae. The hrp genes provided a useful reference for this analysis because they appear to have evolved stably along with the P. syringae genome, as concluded by Sawada et al. (38) based on phylogenetic analyses using hrpL, hrpS, rpoD, and gyrB as indices. The avrPphE and hrpK gene trees constructed in this study agree well with previously reported taxonomic groups (9, 28, 38), indicating that avrPphE, like the hrp cluster, has been stable after its acquisition. The stability of avrPphE is also supported by the alleles found in pathovar tomato DC3000 and pathovar delphinii. Previous studies using PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism of the rrn operon (28) and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA and amplified fragment length polymorphism techniques (9) have shown that pathovars delphinii and tomato are relatively closer to each other than to pathovar phaseolicola, which agrees with our phylogenetic analyses that use avrPphE and hrpK as index genes. Interestingly, despite this similarity, the pathovar delphinii avrPphE gene is located in the EEL, and the pathovar tomato DC3000 avrPphE gene resides on a native plasmid (http://www.tigr.org/tdb/mdb/mdbinprogress.html).
The differing proportions of synonymous mutation, represented by ps in hrpL, hrpK, and avrPphE homologs, suggest that avrPphE may have been acquired later than hrpL and hrpK. The proportion of synonymous nucleotide substitutions (silent) in a protein-coding region indicates the evolutionary divergence of DNA sequences in closely related species (31). The ps of hrpL was reported to be 0.016 within the group of pathovar glycinea, pathovar tabaci, pathovar phaseolicola, and pathovar mori (38). In contrast, the variation in avrPphE (ps = 0.0084) is much lower than that calculated for hrpL and hrpK (ps = 0.019), which suggests that avrPphE was acquired in the EEL region after the bacterium had acquired the hrp cluster. However, since pathovars phaseolicola, glycinea, tabaci, and mori have different hosts, acquisition of avrPphE by the EEL must have occurred before adaptation to specific hosts. This hypothesis also predicts that members in the same taxonomic groups that have been defined by Sawada and others should have a similar suite of genes residing in the EEL, and indeed, a subset of candidate effectors, e.g., AvrPphE and HopPsyA, is commonly present in closely related P. syringae pathovars. Consistent with this concept, pathovar syringae strain 61 and strain 226 are in the same taxonomic group and apparently acquired the shcA-hopPsyA genes before they diverged into strains with different host specificity (20).
The sequences of the EELs also reveal that these loci are rich in mobile genetic elements and plasmid-related sequences, some of which are found in predicted ORFs (21). The EELs of pathovars mori and morsprunorum harbor effector pseudogenes with insertions and nonsense mutations in the coding sequence. This observation is consistent with the growing evidence that the devolution of certain virulence genes to pseudogenes is a significant factor in pathogen evolution (34). The existence of EELs containing only pseudogenes further argues against any intrinsic importance of effectors in this region of the P. syringae genome.
The variability that we observed in the composition of HrpK operons also argues against any functional significance to the location of particular effectors in the operon. For example, the schA-hopPsyA genes are in the HrpK operon in pathovar atrofaciens but in divergently oriented separate operons in pathovar syringae strains 61 and 226. Similarly, avrPphE homologs are in the HrpK operon in several of the strains that we analyzed but are carried on a plasmid in pathovar tomato DC3000, and multiple effector genes are downstream of hrpK in pathovars B728a and delphinii PDDCC 529. The HrpK operon thus appears to represent a locus where horizontal acquisition can result in recruitment of an effector gene into the Hrp regulon.
In summary, we have analyzed the structure of 12 EELs from nine P. syringae pathovars, including three that have been identified previously (2). Several general conclusions can be drawn. First, the locus residing between hrpK and tRNALeu in various P. syringae strains is indeed enriched in effector genes, three of which we have shown here to encode functional effectors. Second, the candidate effectors found in the EELs appear to represent a group of conserved effectors that are commonly present in plant pathogenic bacteria. For instance, there is a homolog of pathovar tomato DC3000 HopPtoB found in P. syringae pv. syringae B728a (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/JGI_microbial/html/pseudomonas_syr/pseudo_syr_mainpage.html), and AvrPphE homologs are widespread, as discussed above. Unlike CEL effectors, which seem to be specific to P. syringae and Erwinia spp., the EEL effectors appear to be more widespread and even include effectors with homologs in animal pathogens. Third, the composition of the EELs does not correlate with host range. For example, pathovar phaseolicola is a bean pathogen, whereas pathovar glycinea and pathovar tabaci are soybean and tobacco pathogens, respectively. Yet they all have highly similar avrPphE genes residing in their EELs. In contrast, the EELs of pathovar phaseolicola B130 and P. syringae pv. syringae B728a share low similarity despite both bacteria being bean pathogens. Fourth, the general congruence of the hrpK and avrPphE phylogenetic trees indicates that avrPphE was acquired early in the evolution of P. syringae before the divergence of modern host-specific pathovars. However, the relatively low number of synonymous mutations in various avrPphE homologs and the existence of EELs possessing hopPsyA or other effectors instead of avrPphE suggest that the effectors in modern EELs were acquired by P. syringae later than hrpK and the rest of the hrp/hrc gene cluster. Fifth, although the general congruence of the hrpK and avrPphE phylogenetic trees indicates that the EELs in many strains have been stable, the several variant EELs that we found violating this congruence suggest that effector "exchanges" can indeed be made in this region. In summary, our findings suggest that evolution of the P. syringae Hrp pathogenicity island occurred in stages, with the EELs and at least some of the effectors being acquired after the hrp/hrc gene cluster but before the divergence of modern pathovars.
|
|
|---|
This work was supported by NSF grants MCB-9982646 and DBI-0077622.
Present address: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»