Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, July 2004, p. 4423-4426, Vol. 186, No. 14
0021-9193/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.14.4423-4426.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
From Rings to Layers: Surprising Patterns of Protein Deposition during Bacterial Spore Assembly
Adam Driks*
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois 60153

INTRODUCTION
Elucidation of the mechanisms of assembly of subcellular structures
is often an elusive goal. The large number of component parts
and the intricate ways in which they interact make experimental
analysis a significant challenge and, in particular, frustrate
attempts at traditional reductionist analysis. Frequently, key
insights come from thoughtful cell biological observations that
identify the most important steps in assembly. In the best cases,
not only do these observations provide critical clues to old
problems, but they also generate novel areas of investigation.
An example of a finding that does both of these things comes
from the work of van Ooij et al. (
36a), published in this issue,
who used careful cell biological analysis to uncover a novel
dimension of the process by which bacterial spores assemble
their external armor plating. These authors found that the deposition
of external proteins on the spore surface is unexpectedly dynamic,
pointing towards as-yet-unknown regulatory mechanisms controlling
spore formation.

SPORE FUNDAMENTALS
Bacterial spores are marvels of nature. They are formed by bacilli
and clostridia in response to starvation during an approximately
8-h developmental process, called sporulation, that is controlled
by a complex cascade of cellular events (
29). The result is
a dormant, highly resistant cell that can endure almost any
stress that nature has to offer. Spores can persist in the dormant
state for very long and perhaps even geological time scales
(
28,
37). Nonetheless, the spore is not insensitive to its surroundings.
Rather, it is continuously poised to react to the reintroduction
of even minute amounts of nutrients to the milieu. The result
is the almost immediate conversion of the spore back to an actively
growing cell, a process known as germination.
These remarkable properties have motivated intensive study of spore formation and resistance since the first published description of spores in 1874 (21). With the advent of molecular approaches and, subsequently, advanced cell biological approaches, spore formation has become a well-developed model for elucidating fundamental mechanisms of development and cellular assembly (34). It is in the context of the assembly of the outermost spore structures that van Ooij et al. have made their contribution.
To appreciate these findings, a brief review of Bacillus subtilis spore ultrastructure is needed. All Bacillus spores have a common architecture (1, 18) (Fig. 1). At the center is the core, a relatively dry compartment that houses the spore DNA. Surrounding this is a membrane (called the inner membrane) and then a thick layer of peptidoglycan called the cortex. The cortex, in turn, is encased in a complex protein shell called the coat, which is the focus of this discussion. (An additional membrane set, the outer membrane, may also be present between the cortex and coat [9], and it is not illustrated in Fig. 1.) The coat has critical roles in protecting the spore from a variety of toxic molecules (6, 25, 32, 33, 39, 40) and in facilitating germination (1, 3, 4, 9). The coat is very likely to have additional functions as well, including the ability to act as an elastic material (7, 10) and the ability to perform enzymatic reactions (14, 15, 19, 24, 26).

A COMPLEX ASSEMBLY PROCESS
We also need to consider how the spore is built. Early in sporulation,
the starving cell's cytoplasm is divided by a specialized septum
into large and small compartments, known as the mother cell
and the forespore, respectively (
29) (Fig.
2A). Following this,
the rim of the septum, where it meets the mother cell envelope,
migrates in the direction of the forespore so as to pinch off
a protoplast. Coat proteins, which are synthesized in the mother
cell cytoplasm, are deposited first on the mother cell side
of the septum and later on the engulfed forespore surface.
Initial interest in the coat as a model system for macromolecular
assembly was motivated in large part by its morphological complexity
(
1,
38). In
B. subtilis, thin-section electron microscopy has
revealed multiple layers in the coat, which are organized into
two major sets: the lightly staining inner coat, which has distinctive
fine lamellae, and a darkly staining outer coat, whose sublayers
are relatively coarse. Analysis of the coat surface by scanning
electron microscopy (
5,
8) and atomic force microscopy (
7) has
shown that the predominant features are ridges, most of which
run along the long axis of the spore. Not surprisingly, the
coat is biochemically complex. It is composed largely of protein
(
22) and is comprised of as many as 60 polypeptide species (
23,
24), most of which are unique to the bacilli and clostridia.
From studies of about 30 of the
B. subtilis coat proteins, a
preliminary model of coat assembly has emerged (
9,
11,
17,
36).
This model reveals the importance of a subset of coat proteins
that guide the deposition of coat proteins from the mother cell
cytoplasm into the appropriate coat layers, as well as direct
the appearance of the ridges on the coat surface (
7). One of
these morphogenetic proteins (SpoIVA [
12,
31,
35]) attaches
the coat to the underlying spore surface; another (CotE [
41])
is responsible for nucleating the formation of the outer layer.
From cell biological analyses, it is clear that in many if not
most cases, each species of coat protein ultimately forms a
shell around the forespore or, in some cases, an incomplete
shell, resulting in what appear to be caps at the forespore
poles (
12,
13). The interconnections between coat proteins are
also becoming better understood. We now know the identities
of several directly interacting coat proteins (
16,
42) and two
of the coat proteins on the surface (
20,
27). Overall, the model
defines the major morphological steps in coat formation, identifies
a significant part of the complex network of coat protein interactions,
and pinpoints coat proteins with pivotal roles in assembly.

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS
As satisfying as the model is, it tells only part of the story.
For example, it gives little insight into the precise sequence
of events that occur during the deposition of any given coat
protein. Detailed descriptions of these steps are essential,
as it is at this level that we will ultimately understand the
molecular interactions that drive coat assembly. van Ooij et
al. used meticulous light microscopic examination and genetic
manipulation to address this deficit. They built strains bearing
fusions of the recently identified coat proteins YabP, YheD,
and YutH (
13) to the green fluorescent protein (GFP) and monitored
their assembly into the coat over time by using fluorescence
microscopy. The striking result is that these proteins do not
coalesce into shells in one step. Instead, and quite unexpectedly,
the localization pattern of each protein is distinct and dynamic.
YabP-GFP, which is synthesized just after the cell divides into
mother cell and forespore compartments, localizes to the septum
(Fig.
2A). As septum migration proceeds, however, relatively
intense foci of fluorescence, in addition to the layer of fluorescence
at the septum, appear at the leading edge of the engulfing septum,
where it meets the mother cell. After engulfment is complete,
the two foci reside opposite each other, along the short axis
of the forespore. This suggests the presence of a ring, which
appears as two dots when it is viewed in projection. The hypothesis
that the two foci are part of a ring of fluorescence in three
dimensions was confirmed by deconvolution methods. In addition
to this ring, a shell of fluorescence encircling the spore appears
at this stage. Formation of the shell, but not formation of
the ring, depends on a coat protein encoded by a gene immediately
upstream of
yabP, called YabQ (
2). Intriguingly, YabP-GFP is
lost from the forespore prior to release from the mother cell.
Even more striking than the localization of YabQ is the localization of YheD. After forespore engulfment, YheD-GFP localizes to four foci that appear to correspond to two rings that are parallel to, but on either side of, the short axis of the forespore (Fig. 2B). The mother cell pole-proximal foci are brighter than the foci towards the forespore pole. Later, a contiguous shell surrounding the forespore appears, and the rings are lost. The final fusion that was examined, YutH-GFP, shows yet a third distinct pattern of localization. Early in sporulation, a sole focus appears at the septum (Fig. 2C). After engulfment, two foci at the extreme mother cell pole of the forespore appear, suggesting that there is a ring at this polar location. Soon after this, the ring becomes a cap. Finally, a shell covering most of the forespore forms.
These remarkable patterns of localization raise a number of intriguing questions. First, what mechanisms guide the dynamic deposition of these proteins? Although as-yet-unidentified proteins are likely to be involved in the initial localization of at least some coat proteins (30) (and, in the case of YabP, were specifically shown to be involved by van Ooij et al.), there is still the question of how any protein can distinguish one location on the forespore surface from another location. Perhaps the process of forespore engulfment is in some manner intrinsically asymmetric, leaving behind telltale markers of position that are recognized by coat proteins. Regardless of how coat proteins initially target to specific locations on the forespore surface, it seems that different mechanisms guide the formation of rings that appear after initial deposition. The latter events may be the result of the intrinsic properties of the proteins in question, as well as the overall dynamics of coat assembly.
A second question is the purpose, if any, of the dynamic aspect of coat assembly characterized by van Ooij et al. One possibility is that the properties of the coat would be fundamentally different if the coat proteins were not assembled in these patterns. Alternatively, these patterns may not so much be critical to the final functioning of the coat but rather may form part of a process that coordinates the simultaneous assembly of a large number coat proteins and prevents deposition of one coat protein species from interfering with deposition of another coat protein species. In any event, it is clear that an additional set of rules needs to be elucidated if we are to fully understand how the spore builds its outer shells. Like the early electron microscopy studies that identified the coat layers and analyses of the coat surface that showed the presence of ridges, the observations of van Ooij et al. uncover yet another layer of regulation of assembly that demands molecular characterization. As a model for macromolecular assembly, the coat is still full of surprises.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I thank Jean Greenberg, David Keating, and Maike Müller
for helpful suggestions.
Work in my laboratory is supported by grants GM53989 and AI53365 from the NIH.

FOOTNOTES
* Mailing address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153. Phone: (708) 216-3706. Fax: (708) 216-9574. E-mail:
adriks{at}lumc.edu.

The views expressed in this Commentary do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or of ASM.

REFERENCES
1 - Aronson, A. I., and P. Fitz-James. 1976. Structure and morphogenesis of the bacterial spore coat. Bacteriol. Rev. 40:360-402.[Free Full Text]
2 - Asai, K., H. Takamatsu, M. Iwano, T. Kodama, K. Watabe, and N. Ogasawara. 2001. The Bacillus subtilis yabQ gene is essential for formation of the spore cortex. Microbiology 147:919-927.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Bagyan, I., and P. Setlow. 2002. Localization of the cortex lytic enzyme CwlJ in spores of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 184:1219-1224.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Behravan, J., H. Chirakkal, A. Masson, and A. Moir. 2000. Mutations in the gerP locus of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus cereus affect access of germinants to their targets in spores. J. Bacteriol. 182:1987-1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Bradley, D. E., and J. G. Franklin. 1958. Electron microscope survey of the surface configuration of spores of the genus Bacillus. J. Bacteriol. 76:618-630.[Free Full Text]
6 - Cabrera-Martinez, R. M., B. Setlow, and P. Setlow. 2002. Studies on the mechanisms of the sporicidal action of ortho- phthalaldehyde. J. Appl. Microbiol. 92:675-680.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - Chada, V. G., E. A. Sanstad, R. Wang, and A. Driks. 2003. Morphogenesis of Bacillus spore surfaces. J. Bacteriol. 185:6255-6261.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Comas-Riu, J., and J. Vives-Rego. 2002. Cytometric monitoring of growth, sporogenesis and spore cell sorting in Paenibacillus polymyxa (formerly Bacillus polymyxa). J. Appl. Microbiol. 92:475-481.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Driks, A. 1999. The Bacillus subtilis spore coat. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:1-20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Driks, A. 2003. The dynamic spore. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:3007-3009.[Free Full Text]
11 - Driks, A. 2002. Proteins of the spore core and coat, p. 527-536. In A. L. Sonenshein, J. A. Hoch, and R. Losick (ed.), Bacillus subtilis and its closest relatives. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
12 - Driks, A., S. Roels, B. Beall, C. P. J. Moran, and R. Losick. 1994. Subcellular localization of proteins involved in the assembly of the spore coat of Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev. 8:234-244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Eichenberger, P., S. T. Jensen, E. M. Conlon, C. van Ooij, J. Silvaggi, J. E. Gonzalez-Pastor, M. Fujita, S. Ben-Yehuda, P. Stragier, J. S. Liu, and R. Losick. 2003. The
E regulon and the identification of additional sporulation genes in Bacillus subtilis. J. Mol. Biol. 327:945-972.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Enguita, F. J., D. Marcal, L. O. Martins, R. Grenha, A. O. Henriques, P. F. Lindley, and M. A. Carrondo. 2004. Substrate and dioxygen binding to the endospore coat laccase from Bacillus subtilis. J. Biol. Chem. 279:23472-23476.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Enguita, F. J., P. M. Matias, L. O. Martins, D. Placido, A. O. Henriques, and M. A. Carrondo. 2002. Spore-coat laccase CotA from Bacillus subtilis: crystallization and preliminary X-ray characterization by the MAD method. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58:1490-1493.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - Henriques, A. O., B. W. Beall, K. Roland, and C. P. J. Moran. 1995. Characterization of cotJ, a sigma E-controlled operon affecting the polypeptide composition of the coat of Bacillus subtilis spores. J. Bacteriol. 177:3394-3406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Henriques, A. O., and C. P. Moran, Jr. 2000. Structure and assembly of the bacterial endospore coat. Methods 20:95-110.[CrossRef][Medline]
18 - Holt, S. C., and E. R. Leadbetter. 1969. Comparative ultrastructure of selected aerobic spore-forming bacteria: a freeze-etching study. Bacteriol. Rev. 33:346-378.[Free Full Text]
19 - Hullo, M. F., I. Moszer, A. Danchin, and I. Martin-Verstraete. 2001. CotA of Bacillus subtilis is a copper-dependent laccase. J. Bacteriol. 183:5426-5430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20 - Isticato, R., G. Cangiano, H. T. Tran, A. Ciabattini, D. Medaglini, M. R. Oggioni, M. De Felice, G. Pozzi, and E. Ricca. 2001. Surface display of recombinant proteins on Bacillus subtilis spores. J. Bacteriol. 183:6294-6301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21 - Koch, R. 1876. The etiology of anthrax, based on the life history of Bacillus anthracis. Beitr. Biol. Pflanz. 2:277-310.
22 - Kornberg, A., J. A. Spudich, D. L. Nelson, and M. Deutscher. 1968. Origin of proteins in sporulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 37:51-78.[CrossRef][Medline]
23 - Kuwana, R., Y. Kasahara, M. Fujibayashi, H. Takamatsu, N. Ogasawara, and K. Watabe. 2002. Proteomics characterization of novel spore proteins of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology 148:3971-3982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24 - Lai, E.-M., N. D. Phadke, M. T. Kachman, R. Giorno, S. Vazquez, J. A. Vazquez, J. R. Maddock, and A. Driks. 2003. Proteomic analysis of the spore coats of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus anthracis. J. Bacteriol. 185:1443-1454.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Loshon, C. A., E. Melly, B. Setlow, and P. Setlow. 2001. Analysis of the killing of spores of Bacillus subtilis by a new disinfectant, Sterilox. J. Appl. Microbiol. 91:1051-1058.[CrossRef][Medline]
26 - Martins, L. O., C. M. Soares, M. M. Pereira, M. Teixeira, T. Costa, G. H. Jones, and A. O. Henriques. 2002. Molecular and biochemical characterization of a highly stable bacterial laccase that occurs as a structural component of the Bacillus subtilis endospore coat. J. Biol. Chem. 277:18849-18859.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27 - Mauriello, E. M., H. Duc le, R. Isticato, G. Cangiano, H. A. Hong, M. De Felice, E. Ricca, and S. M. Cutting. 2004. Display of heterologous antigens on the Bacillus subtilis spore coat using CotC as a fusion partner. Vaccine 22:1177-1187.[CrossRef][Medline]
28 - Nicholson, W. L., N. Munakata, G. Horneck, H. J. Melosh, and P. Setlow. 2000. Resistance of Bacillus endospores to extreme terrestrial and extraterrestrial environments. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64:548-572.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29 - Piggot, P., and R. Losick. 2002. Sporulation genes and intercompartmental regulation, p. 483-517. In A. L. Sonenshein, J. A. Hoch, and R. Losick (ed.), Bacillus subtilis and its closest relatives. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
30 - Price, K. D., and R. Losick. 1999. A four-dimensional view of assembly of a morphogenetic protein during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 181:781-790.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31 - Roels, S., A. Driks, and R. Losick. 1992. Characterization of spoIVA, a sporulation gene involved in coat morphogenesis in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 174:575-585.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32 - Setlow, P. 2003. Spore germination. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6:550-556.[CrossRef][Medline]
33 - Shapiro, M. P., B. Setlow, and P. Setlow. 2004. Killing of Bacillus subtilis spores by a modified Fenton reagent containing CuCl2 and ascorbic acids. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:2535-2539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34 - Sonenshein, A. L., J. A. Hoch, and R. Losick (ed.). 2002. Bacillus subtilis and its closest relatives. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
35 - Stevens, C. M., R. Daniel, N. Illing, and J. Errington. 1992. Characterization of a sporulation gene, spoIVA, involved in spore coat morphogenesis in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 174:586-594.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36 - Takamatsu, H., and K. Watabe. 2002. Assembly and genetics of spore protective structures. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 59:434-444.[CrossRef][Medline]
36 - van Ooij, C., P. Eichenberger, and R. Losick. 2004. Dynamic patterns of subcellular protein localization during spore coat morphogenesis in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 184:4441-4448.
37 - Vreeland, R. H., W. D. Rosenzweig, and D. W. Powers. 2000. Isolation of a 250 million-year-old halotolerant bacterium from a primary salt crystal. Nature 407:897-900.[CrossRef][Medline]
38 - Warth, A. D., D. F. Ohye, and W. G. Murrell. 1963. The composition and structure of bacterial spores. J. Cell Biol. 16:579-592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39 - Young, S. B., and P. Setlow. 2004. Mechanisms of killing of Bacillus subtilis spores by Decon and Oxone, two general decontaminants for biological agents. J. Appl. Microbiol. 96:289-301.[CrossRef][Medline]
40 - Young, S. B., and P. Setlow. 2003. Mechanisms of killing of Bacillus subtilis spores by hypochlorite and chlorine dioxide. J. Appl. Microbiol. 95:54-67.[CrossRef][Medline]
41 - Zheng, L., W. P. Donovan, P. C. Fitz-James, and R. Losick. 1988. Gene encoding a morphogenic protein required in the assembly of the outer coat of the Bacillus subtilis endospore. Genes Dev. 2:1047-1054.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42 - Zilhao, R., M. Serrano, R. Isticato, E. Ricca, C. P. Moran, Jr., and A. O. Henriques. 2004. Interactions among CotB, CotG, and CotH during assembly of the Bacillus subtilis spore coat. J Bacteriol 186:1110-1119.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Journal of Bacteriology, July 2004, p. 4423-4426, Vol. 186, No. 14
0021-9193/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.14.4423-4426.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Mehmi, M., Marshall, L. J., Lambert, P. A., Smith, J. C.
(2009). Evaluation of disinfecting procedures for aseptic transfer in hospital pharmacy departments.. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol
63: 123-138
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wang, L., Perpich, J., Driks, A., Kroos, L.
(2007). Maintaining the Transcription Factor SpoIIID Level Late during Sporulation Causes Spore Defects in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol.
189: 7302-7309
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Basu, S., Kang, T. J., Chen, W. H., Fenton, M. J., Baillie, L., Hibbs, S., Cross, A. S.
(2007). Role of Bacillus anthracis Spore Structures in Macrophage Cytokine Responses. Infect. Immun.
75: 2351-2358
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Klobutcher, L. A., Ragkousi, K., Setlow, P.
(2006). The Bacillus subtilis spore coat provides "eat resistance" during phagocytic predation by the protozoan Tetrahymena thermophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
103: 165-170
[Abstract]
[Full Text]