Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, January 2004, p. 393-399, Vol. 186, No. 2
0021-9193/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.2.393-399.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Chemistry, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131 ,1 Microbial Genome Research Group, Japan Marine Science and Technology Center, 2-15 Natsushima, Yokosuka, 237-0061 Japan2
Received 20 June 2003/ Accepted 10 October 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In Bacillus halodurans C-125 (26), gentisate degradation via oxidation to maleylpyruvate and cleavage to pyruvate is evidenced by the gene cluster represented in Fig. 1. The gene cluster contains two genes encoding homologs to gentisate 1,2-dioxygenase (BH2002 and BH2004, which have 32 to 37% sequence identity to the previously characterized gentisate 1,2-dioxygenase from Sphingomonas sp. strain RW5 [28]) and Ralstonia sp. strain U2 (30). In addition, the neighboring gene BH2005 encodes a homolog of fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase, an enzyme that catalyzes hydrolytic cleavage in the close analog fumarylacetoacetate (17). The presence of an isomerase homologue (BH2000) may indicate the formation of fumarylpyruvate. The upstream gene BH1999 encodes a small protein which is homologous to the 4-hydroxybenzoyl-coenzyme A (CoA) thioesterases from Pseudomonas sp. strain DJ12 (35% identity in amino acid sequence) (5) and strain CBS3 (31% identity in amino acid sequence) (3). It seemed plausible that BH1999 is a gentisyl-CoA thioesterase.
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Organization of the gentisate oxidation pathway gene cluster in B. halodurans. Gene function assignment is tentatively based on the identity of the homologue found in the protein database. SD, Shine-Dalgarno sequence. Promoter- and terminator-like sequences were predicted by the genetic information processing software Genetyx, Mac version 11.0 (Software Development Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
|
|
|
|---|
To a stirred solution of the benzoic acid or phenylacetic acid derivative (470 µmol) in dry tetrahydrofuran (THF) (4 ml), ethyl chloroformate (40 µl, 460 µmol), and triethylamine (50 µl, 360 µmol) were added at 25°C under N2. A white precipitate, which formed over a period of 1 h, was removed by filtration. The resulting clear solution was added dropwise to an N2-purged solution of 50 mg of coenzyme A lithium salt (65 µmol) in 5 ml of 50% THF-water. The pH of the solution was maintained between 7.5 and 8.0 by the addition of 0.1 N LiOH. After stirring for 1 h under N2, the solution was acidified to pH 4 with 1 N HCl. The precipitate was removed by centrifugation (15 min), and the resulting supernatant was adjusted to pH 10. After 1.5 h (for hydrolysis of the side product), the pH was adjusted to 7 with 1 N HCl, and the mixture was then lyophilized. The residue was dissolved in deionized water and then chromatographed on a Sephadex-G25 (Amersham Pharmacia) column (120 cm by 2.5 cm) at 4°C with deionized water as the eluant.
Gentisyl-CoA was prepared by reacting 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic chloride with CoA. 2,5-Dihydroxybenzoic chloride was prepared as previously described (18). To a suspension containing 7.52 g (49 mmol) of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid in 50 ml of anhydrous toluene, 0.1 mol of anhydrous pyridine was added. Thionyl chloride (7.18 g, 60 mmol) was added dropwise to the stirred solution at 10°C. The reaction mixture was then stirred at 60°C for 6 h. The solution was decanted from the residue and concentrated in vacuo at room temperature. The crude acid chloride (300 mg) was dissolved in 5 ml of anhydrous ethanol and then added dropwise to a stirred solution of 30 mg of coenzyme A lithium salt (40 µmol) in 2 ml of 0.5 M NaHCO3 (pH 8.0) at 10°C. The pH was maintained between 7 and 8 by the addition of 1.0 M LiOH in deionized water. The mixture was stirred for an additional 16 h, with the pH maintained at 7 to 8. The mixture was extracted three times with 4 ml of ethyl acetate. The water fraction was concentrated by lyophilization and then chromatographed on a Sephadex-G25 (Amersham Pharmacia) column (120 cm by 2.5 cm) at 4°C with deionized water as the eluant.
The column fractions were analyzed with a Rainin Dynamax high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) system equipped with a Beckman Ultrasphere C-18 reverse-phase column (0.46 by 25 cm). The HPLC column was preequilibrated in 20% solution B (20 mM ammonium phosphate, dibasic, in 64% acetonitrile water solution, pH 6.7) and 80% solution A (20 mM ammonium phosphate, dibasic, in deionized water, pH 6.7). A sequential, linear gradient (20% B, 2 min; 20 to 65% solution B, 14 min; 65% to 80% solution B, 2 min; and 80% to 20% solution B, 2 min) was employed to elute the column at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. The retention time of gentisyl-CoA was 4.5 min.
The Sephadex column fractions containing pure gentisyl-CoA were pooled and concentrated by lyophilization. The yield of gentisyl-CoA was ca. 3 mg (10%). The UV spectrum of gentisyl-CoA (in water) was
max = 260 nm,
= 17.8 mM-1 cm-1,
shoulder = 350 nm,
= 4.43 mM-1 cm-1. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance of gentisyl-CoA (in D2O pH 6.0):
0.59 (s, 3H), 0.73 (s, 3H), 2.28 (t, 2H, J = 6Hz), 3.02 (t, 2H), 3.33 (m, 4H), 3.45 (d, 1H, J = 6Hz), 3.69 (d, 1H, J = 7Hz), 3.88 (s, 1H), 4.13 (s, 2H), 4.44 (s, 1H), 5.95(d, 1H, J = 5Hz), 6.65 (d, 1H, J = 9Hz, aromatic H), 6.86 (d, 1H, J = 6Hz, aromatic H), 7.00 (d, 1H, J = 3Hz, aromatic H), 7.97 (s, 1H), 8.33 (s, 1H).
Cloning and expression of the BH1999 gene in E. coli and protein purification.
The gene encoding BH1999 from Bacillus halodurans C-125 (24) was amplified by PCR with the clone BH1999/pCR 2.1 and Pfu Turbo DNA polymerase (Stratagene). Primers containing restriction endonuclease cleavage sites for NdeI and XhoI were used. The amplification protocol employed 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C, annealing at 45°C, and elongation at 72°C. The pET-23b vector (Novagen), which was linearized with the restriction enzymes NdeI and XhoI, was ligated to the isolated gene. The ligation product was used to transform E. coli JM109 competent cells (Stratagene). Plasmid was prepared using a QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen). The gene sequence was confirmed by DNA sequencing. The recombinant plasmid wild-type-BH1999/pET-23b was used to transform BL21(DE3) competent cells (Novagen). The transformed cells were grown at 32°C in 1.5 liters of Luria broth (LB) containing 50 µg of carbenicillin/ml to an OD600 of
0.8 and then induced with 0.4 mM isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to an OD600 of
2.0. The cells were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in ice-cold 50 mM K+HEPES buffer (pH 7.5) containing 2 mM dithiothreitol and 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and lysed in a French press. Following centrifugation, the supernatant was loaded onto a Butyl Sepharose 4 fast flow column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, 2.5 by 25 cm) equilibrated with 1,000 ml of 10% ammonium sulfate in 50 mM potassium salt of N-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid (K+HEPES buffer). A 1,200-ml 10% to 0% linear gradient of ammonium sulfate in 50 mM K+HEPES (pH 7.5, 4°C) with a flow rate of 3 ml/min was used to elute the protein.
The desired fractions (eluted at 6% ammonium sulfate) were pooled, concentrated, and dialyzed against 50 mM K+HEPES (pH 7.5, 4°C) containing 0.1 M KCl and 1 mM dithiothreitol. The sample was loaded onto a Bio-Gel HTP gel hydroxyapatite (Bio-Rad, 2.5 by 20 cm) column and eluted with 400 ml of a linear gradient of 0.01 M to 0.4 M K2HPO4 in 10 mM K+HEPES (pH 7.5, 4°C) with a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min. The desired fractions (eluted at 0.3 M K2HPO4) were pooled, concentrated, and dialyzed against 10 mM 3-(cyclohexylamino)-2-hydroxy-1-propanesulfonate (CAPSO, pH 9.5, 4°C) containing 0.5 M KCl and 1 mM dithiothreitol. The enzyme was stable under this condition for prolonged storage at -80°C. The yield of homogeneous BH1999 protein (as judged by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [SDS-PAGE] analysis) was 20 mg of protein/g of wet cells.
Site-directed mutations. Mutagenesis was carried out with a PCR strategy based on WT-BH1999/pET-23b plasmid as the template, commercial primers, the PCR kit supplied by Stratagene, and the Techgene thermal cycler manufactured by Techne (Princeton, N.J.). The PCR products were used to transform E. coli JM109 competent cells (Stratagene). Plasmids were prepared with a QIAprep spin miniprep kit (Qiagen). The sequence of the mutated gene was confirmed by DNA sequencing. The recombinant mutant plasmid was used to transform E. coli BL21(DE3) competent cells (Novagen). The D16A, D16N, and D31N mutant proteins were purified as described above for the wild-type BH1999 protein and shown to be homogeneous on the basis of SDS-PAGE analysis. The yields of homogeneous mutant BH1999 proteins were (per gram of wet cells): D16A, 15 mg/g; D16N, 15 mg/g; and D31N, 14 mg/g.
Steady-state kinetic analysis of catalyzed hydrolysis of hydroxybenzoyl-CoAs. The recombinant Pseudomonas sp. strain CBS3 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase (31) catalyzed hydrolysis reaction of 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA was monitored as described (31). All other thioesterase reactions were monitored at 25°C with a 5,5'-dithio-bis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB)-based assay in which the absorbance of 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoate at 412 nm was measured. The 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoate was produced by the reaction of DTNB with the CoA liberated from the acyl-CoA substrate upon hydrolysis. The 0.2-ml reaction solutions contained enzyme (BH1999: 0.25 µM for 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA, 0.015 µM for 3-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA, 0.005 µM for gentisyl-CoA, 0.42 µM for benzoyl-CoA, 0.05 µM for 4-chlorobenzoyl-CoA, 0.25 µM for 4-methoxybenzoyl-CoA, 4.0 µM for phenylacetyl-CoA, 7.5 µM for 3-hydroxyphenylacetyl-CoA, 4-hydroxyphenylacetyl-CoA, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetyl-CoA, crotonyl-CoA, n-propionyl-CoA and n-hexanoyl-CoA; Pseudomonas 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase: 0.01 µM for 3-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA and gentisyl-CoA), various concentrations of substrate (0.5 to 5 times the Km), DTNB (1 mM), KCl (0.2 M), and 50 mM K+HEPES (pH 7.5, 25°C) in a quartz cuvette of 1-cm light path length.
The initial velocity data, measured as a function of substrate concentration, were analyzed with the equation below and the computer program KinetAsyst (IntelliKinetics): V = Vmax [S]/([S] + Km), where V is the initial velocity, Vmax is the maximum velocity, [S] is the substrate concentration, and Km is the Michaelis constant. kcat was calculated from Vmax/[E] where [E] is the total enzyme concentration determined by the Bradford method (4).
Gentisyl-CoA hydrolysis catalyzed by the BH1999 mutants (1.6 µM for D16A, 0.5 µM for D16N, and 0.09 µM for D31N mutants) was monitored with the DTNB assay described above. For the BH1999 D16A mutant, low activity and a small Km prohibited accurate determination of the Km value, and therefore only the kcat value was determined (with saturating substrate concentrations).
Determination of the pH optimum for BH1999-catalyzed reactions.
The kcat values were determined from initial velocity data measured, at saturating levels of substrate, as a function of the reaction pH. BH1999 (0.09 µM)-catalyzed hydrolysis of gentisyl-CoA (250 µM) was monitored at 365 nm (
of 4.0 mM-1 cm-1) and 25°C over the pH range of 6.0 to 11.0. The pH was maintained with a dual buffer system consisting of 50 mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonate (MES) and 50 mM HEPES (pH 6.0 to 8.0); 50 mM HEPES and 50 mM N-tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl-3-aminopropane sulfonate (TAPS, pH 8.0 to 9.0); 50 mM TAPS and 50 mM CAPSO (pH 9.0 to 10.0); and 50 mM CAPSO and 50 mM 3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-propanesulfonate (CAPS, pH 10.0 to 11.0) containing 0.2 M KCl.
Stability of BH1999 in buffer solution at different pH values.
BH1999 (7.5 µM) was incubated (at 25°C) in solutions (containing 0.2 M KCl) having different pH values, buffered with 50 mM acetate and MES (pH 4.0 to 5.0), 50 mM HEPES and MES (pH 6.0 to 8.0), 50 mM TAPS and CAPSO (pH 9.0), and 50 mM CAPSO and CAPS (pH 10.0 to 11.0). After 2 min of incubation, 0.09 µM BH1999 was assayed in 50 mM CAPSO and CAPS buffer (pH 10.0) containing 0.2 M KCl and 250 µM gentisyl-CoA by monitoring the absorbance changes at 365 nm (
of 4.0 mM-1 cm-1) at 25°C.
|
|
|---|
15 kDa (Fig. 2). The molecular weight of purified BH1999 protein determined by electrospray mass spectrometry is 15,739, in agreement with the theoretical value of 15,739.
![]() View larger version (66K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. SDS-PAGE gel (18% cross-link; Coomassie blue stained) of (from left to right) the Invitrogen BenchMark protein ladder and wild-type, D16N, D16A, and D31N gentisyl-CoA thioesterases.
|
This idea was pursued by first testing thioesterase activity towards 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA. The steady-state kinetic constants obtained (Table 1) were consistent with BH1999 functioning as a thioesterase directed at a hydroxylated benzoyl-CoA substrate. This conclusion was supported by the reduced kcat/Km value for catalysis of benzoyl-CoA hydrolysis. The modest activity of the 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA substrate compared to what has been observed previously with the Pseudomonas 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase (Table 1) (31) suggested that the physiological substrate of the BH1999 protein is hydroxylated at the meta and/or ortho benzoyl ring position rather than at the para position.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Steady-state kinetic constants for B. halodurans gentisyl-CoA thioesterase- and Pseudomonas 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase-catalyzed hydrolysis of acyl-CoAs
|
25-fold smaller compared to the Km measured with the 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA. The BH1999 protein thus prefers two-ring hydroxyl groups in its substrate, one at the C-2 position and the other at the C-5 position. The CoA thioesters of phenylacetate and its ring hydroxylated derivatives were tested as substrates for BH1999 to determine if this enzyme might function in the catabolism of these common aromatics. The results reported in Table 1 indicate no such role. The CoA thioesters of aliphatic acyl-CoA thioesters were also tested as substrates. These too were not active substrates.
The fact that the BH1999 protein catalyzes the hydrolysis of gentisyl-CoA efficiently (kcat/Km of 1.6 x 106 M-1 s-1) and the hydrolysis of 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA inefficiently (kcat/Km = 3.6 x 102 M-1 s-1) is a strong indicator that the BH1999 protein evolved within the hotdog fold thioesterase family specifically to catalyze gentisyl-CoA hydrolysis. In contrast, the Pseudomonas 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase catalyzes the hydrolysis of 4-hydroxylbenzoyl-CoA efficiently (kcat/Km = 3 x 106 M-1 s-1) (31). It was not known if the high degree of substrate specificity observed with the BH1999 protein was mirrored in the Pseudomonas 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase.
To address this issue, the substrate activities of 3-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA and gentisyl-CoA were measured with the Pseudomonas 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase. The kinetic constants obtained are listed in Table 1. Although the kcat measured for 3-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA is close to the kcat observed for 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA as the substrate, the kcat/Km is 55-fold smaller. Similarly, the kcat/Km for Pseudomonas 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase-catalyzed hydrolysis of gentisyl-CoA was 20-fold lower than that determined with 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA as the substrate. The Pseudomonas 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase thus prefers 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA to the 3-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA and gentisyl-CoA. However, the level of substrate discrimination observed in the BH1999 protein is not matched in the 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase. It is interesting that the Pseudomonas 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase could function as a gentisyl-CoA thioesterase in the cell, whereas the BH1999 protein (hereafter referred to as gentisyl-CoA thioesterase) could not fill the role of the 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase.
The basis for BH1999's discrimination between the C-3- and C-4-hydroxylated benzoyl-CoAs was tested by measuring the activities of 4-chlorobenzoyl-CoA and 4-methoxybenzoyl-CoA. The substrate activity of thioesters was low but considerably higher than that of 4-hydroxbenzoyl-CoA despite the fact that both were substituted at C-4. Thus, steric hindrance is not the sole reason why the 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA is a poor substrate. We hypothesize that the C-4 OH may facilitate nonproductive binding through H-bonding interaction.
pH optimum for catalysis.
The kinetic constants reported in Table 1 were determined at pH 7.5. Is this the pH optimum for gentisyl-CoA thioesterase? To answer this question, the kcat pH profile of catalyzed gentisyl-CoA hydrolysis was measured with initial-velocity techniques. As illustrated in Fig. 3A, the pH profile is relatively flat over the pH range 6 to 8.5 and bell-shaped in the range of pH 9 to 11. The maximum turnover rate, reached at pH 10, is
10-fold greater than that reached at pH 7.5. Preincubation (2 min) of the enzyme (7.5 µM) in the different buffers followed by kcat determination at pH 10 (assay time, 1 to 2 min) showed that the enzyme activity was not affected by preincubation at pH 4 to 10 (Fig. 3B). Above pH 10, the activity of the enzyme was rapidly lost, indicating that the drop in the pH profile (Fig. 3A) observed at pH > 10 is the result of enzyme denaturation. At pH 10, the gentisyl-CoA is ionized at one of the two ring hydroxyl groups (pKa = 9.5 as determined by pH titration monitored at 400 nm; data not shown). Although, at this time, we have not measured the kcat/Km pH profile, we might anticipate the contribution of reduced substrate binding above pH 9 owing to the ring ionization.
![]() View larger version (8K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. (A) Kinetic pH rate profile: log kcat (per second) versus pH rate for wild-type B. halodurans gentisyl-CoA thioesterase measured at 25°C. See the Materials and Methods for details. (B) The stability pH profile: kcat (per second) of wild-type B. halodurans gentisyl-CoA thioesterase incubated for 2 min in the buffers used in A and then assayed at 25°C in 50 mM CAPSO and CAPS (pH 10)-0.2 M KCl buffer.
|
10,000-fold decrease in kcat value (31), while the mutation of Asp32 to Ser resulted in a 30-fold decrease in kcat and a 7-fold increase in Km (unpublished result). |
View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Pairwise alignment of B. halodurans gentisyl-CoA thioesterase (BH1999) and the Pseudomonas 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA (Psthio) thioesterase generated by the 3D-PSSM program. The secondary structure is designated with a block ( helix) or an arrow (ß strand). Conserved residues are shaded, and the gentisyl-CoA thioesterase residues Asp16 and Asp31 are labeled.
|
Both the D16A and D16N gentisyl-CoA thioesterases showed a large decrease (2,000- and 230-fold, respectively) in their kcat values compared to the wild-type enzyme, while the D31N kcat value was reduced by only a factor of 10. Because of low activity and coupled with a small Km value, the Km value of the D16A thioesterase could not be measured accurately. The Km value measured for the D31N mutant, on the other hand, was found to be fourfold larger than that obtained with the wild-type enzyme (Table 1). These results suggest that Asp16 plays an important role in gentisyl-CoA catalysis while Asp31 does not.
Qualitatively, the activity losses observed with the gentisyl-CoA thioesterase Asp16 and Asp31 mutants paralleled those obtained for the Pseudomonas 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase D17N and D32S mutants. It is, however, noteworthy that (based on the activity difference between the wild-type and Asp to Asn mutant enzymes) Asp17 contributes a rate factor of 10,000 to Pseudomonas 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase catalysis, while Asp16 contributes a rate factor of only 230 to the gentisyl-CoA thioesterase catalysis. While it might be expected that the catalytic role assumed by Asp16 in the gentisyl-CoA thioesterase is the same as that (i.e., nucleophilic catalysis) played by Asp17 in Pseudomonas 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase catalysis, the large difference in the observed rate contribution would suggest otherwise. Alternatively, this result may indicate reversion of the gentisyl-CoA thioesterase D16N mutant back to wild-type thioesterase (a phenomenon observed with certain dehalogenases) (29). Indeed, the D16A gentisyl-CoA thioesterase is 2,000-fold less active than the wild-type enzyme. Determination of gentisyl-CoA thioesterase structure and mechanism will be required to better understand this anomaly.
Summary and conclusions. In this study, we have shown that the Bacillus halodurans BH1999 protein is gentisyl-CoA thioesterase, that it possesses the novel hotdog fold previously described for the Pseudomonas sp. strain CBS3 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase, and, like the 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase, it possesses two active-site Asp residues, one of which plays an important role in catalysis. The two thioesterases are, however, distinct in several ways.
First, the kcat/Km for gentisyl-CoA thioesterase catalyzed hydrolysis of gentisyl-CoA versus 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA is 1.6 x 106 versus 3.6 x 102 M-1 s-1 (4400: 1) while the kcat/Km for 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase catalyzed hydrolysis of gentisyl-CoA versus 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA is 1.5 x 105 versus 3 x 106 M-1 s-1 (1:20). The difference in the level of substrate specificity is striking. Whereas the gentisyl-CoA thioesterase is highly discriminating towards the two substrates, the 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase is not.
Second, the pH optimum of the gentisyl-CoA thioesterase, as measured by the pH dependence of kcat, is
10, whereas for the Pseudomonas 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase, the pH optimum is between 7 and 9 (unpublished results). B. halodurans inhabits an alkaline environment, and consequently, the pH optima observed for its extracellular enzymes are 10 to 11.5 (25), The gentisyl-CoA thioesterase, however, is a cytoplasmic enzyme. Despite the high external pH values, the intracellular pH is maintained between 7.4 and 8.4 (13). Thus, the 10-fold increase in kcat observed at pH values above the physiological pH has no apparent functional basis.
Third, the Asp catalytic groups of the two thioesterases contribute dramatically different rate enhancements. The loss of Asp17 function in the 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase essentially shuts down catalysis, while loss of Asp16 function in the gentisyl-CoA thioesterase reduces it by 230-fold. This result is consistent with different catalytic functions for Asp17 and Asp16 of the two thioesterases. However, the possibility that the higher than expected activity of the D16N mutant is the result of wild-type thioesterase contamination (via Asn16 hydrolysis to Asp) has not been ruled out.
Lastly, the two thioesterases perform different physiological roles. The 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA thioesterase gene is located within the 4-chlorobenzoate degradation pathway operon found in 4-chlorobenzoate-degrading bacteria, including Pseudomonas sp. strain CBS3. Thus, despite the fact that this thioesterase can hydrolyze gentisyl-CoA at a physiologically significant rate, the actual function of the thioesterase is catalysis of 4-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA hydrolysis, the third and final step of the 4-chlorobenzoate degradation pathway.
The genome context of BH1999 (Fig. 1) suggests that the physiological function of the gentisyl-CoA thioesterase may be linked to the enzymes of the putative gentisate oxidation pathway. The origin of the gentisyl-CoA is, however, presently not known. The amino acid sequences of the proteins encoded by the neighboring genes give no indication of enzymes of an "upper" aromatic degradation pathway in which gentisyl-CoA might be formed.
The formation of gentisyl-CoA has been evidenced in other bacterial strains. For example, it has been shown that gentisyl-CoA is formed in the hydroquinone degradation pathway of anaerobic fermenting bacteria (10). Here, gentisate is generated by carboxylation of hydroquinone and then converted to gentisyl-CoA by an acyl-CoA synthetase. Reductive elimination of the hydroxyl group of gentisyl-CoA catalyzed by gentisyl-CoA reductase produces benzoyl-CoA, which is degraded via the well-characterized benzoate pathway (7).
An early study of naphthalene degradation by Rhodococcus sp. strain B4 suggested gentisyl-CoA as an intermediate and thus a possible role for gentisyl-CoA thioesterase (11). Also, the first steps of a novel benzoate aerobic degradation pathway observed in a denitrifying bacterium may involve transformation of benzoate to benzoyl-CoA, benzoyl-CoA to 3-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA, and 3-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA to gentisyl-CoA (1, 19). Finally, it has been postulated that gentisyl-CoA is formed from 4-hydroxbenzoyl-CoA in halophilic Archaea via the action of a novel monooxygenase that catalyzes intramolecular thioester group migration (i.e., the NIH shift) (6).
The involvement of gentisyl-CoA in aromatic degradation pathways in a variety of bacteria and archaea suggest a possible role for gentisyl-CoA thioesterase as a link between certain upper aromatic degradation pathways and the (lower) gentisate oxidation pathway. In this study we have, for the first time, demonstrated the existence of a gentisyl-CoA thioesterase.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»