Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2004, p. 7015-7018, Vol. 186, No. 20
0021-9193/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.20.7015-7018.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Evidence for Polyadenylated mRNA in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Senthil Selvan Saravanamuthu,1 Franz von Götz,1,
Prabhakar Salunkhe,2,
Rathinam Chozhavendan,3 Robert Geffers,4 Jan Buer,1,4 Burkhard Tümmler,2 and Ivo Steinmetz1*
Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology,1
Clinical Research Group,2
Department for Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover,3
German Research Centre for Biotechnology, Braunschweig, Germany4
Received 29 June 2004/
Accepted 5 July 2004

ABSTRACT
In this paper, we report the synthesis of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa cDNA in the presence of oligo(dT) primers. Hybridization of
oligonucleotide DNA microarrays indicates that under the experimental
conditions used, at least 43.7% of the expressed genes from
P. aeruginosa PAO1, representing many different functional classes,
can be detected by using oligo(dT)-primed cDNAs.

TEXT
There is growing evidence for the occurrence of polyadenylated
mRNAs in a variety of prokaryotes (
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
14,
15,
17),
though the phenomenon has been historically regarded as a feature
of eukaryotic mRNA processing. Poly(A) tracts in eukaryotic
mRNA typically range between 80 and 200 nucleotides, whereas
poly(A) tracts in prokaryotes range between 14 and 60 nucleotides
(
18). The functions of bacterial RNA polyadenylation are variable
and range from control of plasmid replication to modulation
of mRNA stability to mRNA degradation, and it may play a role
in mRNA translation (
18). We report here the occurrence of polyadenylation
of mRNA in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa as evidenced by the oligo(dT)-dependent
cDNA synthesis and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis
of different strains of
P. aeruginosa. Furthermore, we used
oligonucleotide DNA microarrays to analyze the extent of mRNA
polyadenylation in
P. aeruginosa PAO1.
RT-PCR of selected genes with oligo(dT)-primed cDNA from different P. aeruginosa strains.
PAO1, a wound isolate and genetic reference strain (9, 20), was obtained from the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (Braunschweig, Germany). Strains 20265 (wild type) (8, 22) and TB (21) were isolated from cystic fibrosis patients and maintained in our laboratory collection. P. aeruginosa strains were grown in modified Vogel-Bonner medium (3.3 mM MgSO4, 10 mM citric acid, 28 mM NaNH4HPO4, 37 mM K2HPO4, 214 mM potassium D-gluconate [pH 7.2]), and RNA was prepared exactly as recently described (22). For the RT-PCR, 2 µg of the total RNA and 150 ng of a random primer (Invitrogen) were incubated at 65°C for 10 min. Then, 4 µl of fivefold-concentrated first-strand buffer of Expand reverse transcriptase (2 µl of 10 mM dithiothreitol, 2 µl of a 10 mM concentration of deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 1 µl [1 U] of Expand reverse transcriptase [all of these components were purchased from Roche]) was added and incubated at 43°C for 60 min. PCR was done with 2 µl of the above-described reaction mixture, and the following components were added: 2 µl of 10x PCR buffer (Roche), 2 µl of a 2 mM concentration of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dATP, dGTP, dTTP, and dCTP), 2 µl of the 5 pM forward primer (for rpoD, 5'-GGG GAT CAA CGT ATT CGA GA-3'; for feoB, 5'-TGT ACC ATG TGC CAC ACC TT-3'), 2 µl of the 5 pM reverse primer (for rpoD, 5'-TCA TCG GGA TCG ATA TAG CC-3'; for feoB, 5'-GGT CGT AGC CTT CGT AGT CG-3'), 0.3 U of Expand Hifi enzyme (Roche), and 8 µl of double-distilled water. The expected amplification products of both genes were 356 bp.
As shown in Fig. 1, a continuous smear of P. aeruginosa PAO1 cDNA could be observed with oligo(dT) primers as well as with random hexamer primers, whereas no bands were observed in the negative controls lacking RNA or oligo(dT) primers. The yield of cDNA resulting from the oligo(dT)-primed reaction was approximately five times less than that resulting from random-primed reactions with the same amounts of RNA used, as determined by UV spectrophotometry.
In order to determine if the phenomenon of polyadenylation was
prevalent among different strains of
P. aeruginosa,
rpoD was
amplified from cDNA synthesized with oligo(dT) primers from
strain PAO1 and two clinical isolates, namely, strain TB and
strain 20265. Figure
2A shows, as expected, a 356-bp amplification
product corresponding to
rpoD of strain TB. It was confirmed
by sequencing the eluted PCR products from these three reactions
that the amplification product of
rpoD with cDNA prepared in
the presence of oligo(dT) primers was identical to the product
obtained by use of genomic DNA or the cDNA generated by use
of random hexamer primers as templates. The same results were
obtained for strains 20265 and PAO1 (data not shown). Additionally,
an mRNA transcript of a
feoB homologue in
P. aeruginosa, PA4358,
was also amplified by RT-PCR in strain 20265 by using gene-specific
primers, and amplification products could be detected in cDNA
preparations made in the presence of oligo(dT) primers (Fig.
2B). Again, the size and sequence identity of the RT-PCR product
were found to match those of the product amplified from the
genomic DNA. Thus, the ability to synthesize cDNA by using oligo(dT)
primers and the occurrence of polyadenylation in mRNAs were
clearly demonstrated in different strains of
P. aeruginosa.
DNA microarray analysis with oligo(dT)-primed cDNA from P. aeruginosa PAO1.
To confirm and evaluate the phenomenon of polyadenylation of
P. aeruginosa mRNA,
P. aeruginosa PAO1 RNA isolated from cells
grown in Vogel-Bonner medium was reverse transcribed with either
the oligo(dT) primer or the random hexamer primers. Both resultant
cDNAs were hybridized to a
P. aeruginosa PAO1 GeneChip (Affymetrix).
Procedures for cDNA synthesis and DNA microarray analysis using
the
P. aeruginosa GeneChip were performed as recently described
(
22). cDNA synthesized with oligo(dT) primers and random, arbitrary
primers were hybridized to two chips each in order to have replicates
for the analysis (each chip was hybridized with an independent
cDNA prepared with independent RNA pools). Primary data analysis
was performed with Microarray Suite (MAS) 5.0 software supplied
by Affymetrix. Subsequent analysis was performed using Microsoft
Access and Microsoft Excel. When primary data were analyzed,
a signal for every gene was considered to be present only if
there was strong presence or marginal presence of signals (as
computed by Affymetrix MAS 5.0 with default parameters) on both
replicate chips hybridized with the same cDNA. When a signal
was absent in only one of the replicate chips, the gene itself
was considered to be undetected. The annotations of the genes
were based on the most recent annotations available from the
PseudoCAP website (
http://www.pseudomonas.com).
A comparative DNA microarray analysis was used to identify the specific genes whose RNA transcripts were polyadenylated, giving some estimates of the extent of polyadenylation and the type of transcripts that were polyadenylated. A total of 2,739 genes with significant signal intensities (according to the statistical algorithms of MAS 5.0) were detected by using random-primed cDNA synthesis. This figure represents 49.3% of the total 5,549 P. aeruginosa PAO1 coding sequences on the chip (Table 1). Out of these 2,739 genes, 1,199, representing 21.6% of the 5,549 coding sequences, were found to have polyadenylation of their mRNA transcripts because they were also detected in cDNA preparations made from oligo(dT)-primed reactions (Table 1). These genes included rpoD and feoB, whose transcripts were found to be polyadenylated by RT-PCR. Thus, 43.7% of the genes detected by random-primed cDNA synthesis showed polyadenylation of their corresponding mRNAs. Signals for only 16 genes were detected exclusively by oligo(dT)-primed cDNA (Table 1). None of the 16 genes were detected in random-primed cDNA preparations in the present study, and, interestingly, almost all of them belonged to the functional class of hypothetical proteins. However, mRNA transcripts of these 16 genes had been detected in earlier hybridizations on microarrays with random-primed cDNA from strains 20265 (22) and PAO1 (16), indicating that cDNAs for these genes were not primed exclusively by oligo(dT), as revealed by the present study.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1. Detection of genes on a P. aeruginosa GeneChip by using cDNAs prepared with either oligo(dT) primers or random hexamer primers
|
Genes detected by oligo(dT)-primed cDNA belong to almost all
26 of the major functional classes (Fig.
3). Significantly fewer
or no genes were detected in the functional classes of two-component
regulatory systems, transcriptional regulators, phage-related
proteins, and putative enzymes. The number of genes detected
by oligo(dT)-primed cDNA exceeded the number of genes detected
by random-primed cDNA in 14 of the 26 major functional classes.
To the best of our knowledge, there has been no report demonstrating
the occurrence of polyadenylation in any pseudomonad. DNA microarray
analysis has been used to demonstrate the extent of polyadenylation
of mycobacterial mRNAs (
12). It has been shown that 30% of genes
which could be detected by mycobacterial cDNA primed with genome-directed
oligonucleotides could also be detected by oligo(dT)-primed
cDNA, but no information on the functional classes of the genes
detected was provided (
12). It is possible that the number of
mRNAs primed by oligo(dT) was underestimated because the large
amounts of polyadenylated rRNA may have depressed cDNA synthesis
from mRNA templates. Indeed, there were intense signals for
the rRNA genes as well when the GeneChips were hybridized with
oligo(dT)-primed cDNAs (data not shown). The priming efficiency
of the random hexamer primers to generate representative cDNAs
was unrivaled by the oligo(dT) primers. Therefore, use of oligo(dT)
primers to generate cDNA representative of the total RNA preparation
is largely relevant to the detection of the polyadenylated species
of RNAs among a heterogenous mixture of total RNA preparation
and not to complement detection using random hexamer-primed
cDNA.
The chief enzymes that are responsible for polyadenylation are poly(A) polymerases. Even though the poly(A) polymerases of Escherichia coli have been well studied, their counterparts in P. aeruginosa have been annotated purely on the basis of their sequence homologies. pcnB encodes the major poly(A) polymerase PapI in E. coli. Poly(A) polymerase (ATP:polyribonucleotide adenylyltransferase) catalyzes the template-independent sequential addition of adenylate residues to the 3'-hydroxyl termini of RNA molecules. pnp encodes a 3' exonuclease, polynucleotide phosphorylase, and rne encodes an endonuclease, RNase E, and both of these are implicated in the turnover of poly(A) tracts and the in vivo modulation of polyadenylation in E. coli (13). It is known that the S1 ribosomal protein is a poly(A) binding protein in E. coli (11). hfq is known to stimulate elongation of poly(A) tails by poly(A) polymerase I in E. coli (7). As further evidence for the occurrence of polyadenylation in P. aeruginosa, expression signals of pnp (PA4740), rne (PA2976), and pcnB (PA4727) could be detected in the array analysis. In addition, high levels of the putative poly(A) binding protein PA3162 were detected. hfq (PA4944) was yet another gene with a possible involvement in polyadenylation, whose transcripts were detected with significant signal intensities (data not shown). The future construction of knockouts of these P. aeruginosa genes will help to elucidate their role in polyadenylation.
Conclusions.
Our study indicates that polyadenylation seems to occur in the mRNAs of all the major functional classes of genes in P. aeruginosa and is not restricted to any one or group of them. Much of our knowledge about bacterial polyadenylation has been derived from works about E. coli (18, 19). In E. coli, polyadenylation of some genes depends on growth rate (10) and growth phase (6), with increased polyadenylation observed in slowly growing cells. It remains to be investigated whether there exist any differences in polyadenylation with respect to growth rate and growth phases in P. aeruginosa as well. Another question to be investigated is whether the polyadenylation in P. aeruginosa has the same functions as those described for polyadenylation in E. coli, i.e., marking mRNA transcripts for degradation by RNases (19), which is important for maintaining equilibrium of the normal RNA turnover, or if it has some novel functions. Understanding the role of P. aeruginosa mRNA polyadenylation in the overall gene expression and the enzymes involved in these processes might be crucial to enhance our understanding of the versatile lifestyle of this opportunistic pathogen.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the European Graduate College on
Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Pathogenicity and Biotechnology sponsored
by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).
We are most grateful for the interest and strong support of Dieter Bitter-Suermann and for the excellent technical assistance of Tanja Toepfer.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Present address: Friedrich Loeffler Institute for Medical Microbiology, Ernst Moritz Arndt-University Greifswald, Martin-Luther-Straße 6, 17487 Griefswald, Germany. Phone: (49) 3834-865560. Fax: (49) 3834-865561. E-mail:
steinmetz.ivo{at}uni-griefswald.de.

F.V.G. and P.S. contributed equally to this work. 

REFERENCES
1 - Adilakshmi, T., P. D. Ayling, and C. Ratledge. 2000. Polyadenylylation in mycobacteria: evidence for oligo(dT)-primed cDNA synthesis. Microbiology 146:633-638.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Bralley, P., and G. H. Jones. 2001. Poly(A) polymerase activity and RNA polyadenylation in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Mol. Microbiol. 40:1155-1164.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Brown, J. W., and J. N. Reeve. 1986. Polyadenylated RNA isolated from the archaebacterium Halobacterium halobium. J. Bacteriol. 166:686-688.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Cao, G. J., and N. Sarkar. 1992. Identification of the gene for an Escherichia coli poly(A) polymerase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:10380-10384.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Cao, G. J., and N. Sarkar. 1993. Poly(A) RNA in Bacillus subtilis: identification of the polyadenylylation site of flagellin mRNA. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 108:281-285.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Cao, G. J., and N. Sarkar. 1997. Stationary phase-specific mRNAs in Escherichia coli are polyadenylated. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 239:46-50.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - Hajnsdorf, E., and P. Regnier. 2000. Host factor Hfq of Escherichia coli stimulates elongation of poly(A) tails by poly(A) polymerase I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:1501-1505.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Häussler, S., I. Ziegler, A. Lottel, F. von Götz, M. Rohde, D. Wehmhöner, S. Saravanamuthu, B. Tümmler, and I. Steinmetz. 2003. Highly adherent small-colony variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis lung infection. J. Med. Microbiol. 52:295-301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Holloway, B. W., U. Römling, and B. Tümmler. 1994. Genomic mapping of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Microbiology 140:2907-2929.[Free Full Text]
10 - Jasiecki, J., and G. Wegrzyn. 2003. Growth-rate dependent RNA polyadenylation in Escherichia coli. EMBO Rep. 4:172-177.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Kalapos, M. P., H. Paulus, and N. Sarkar. 1997. Identification of ribosomal protein S1 as a poly(A) binding protein in Escherichia coli. Biochimie 79:493-502.[Medline]
12 - Lakey, D. L., Y. Zhang, A. M. Talaat, B. Samten, L. E. DesJardin, K. D. Eisenach, S. A. Johnston, and P. F. Barnes. 2002. Priming reverse transcription with oligo(dT) does not yield representative samples of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cDNA. Microbiology 148:2567-2572.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Mohanty, B. K., and S. R. Kushner. 2000. Polynucleotide phosphorylase, RNase II and RNase E play different roles in the in vivo modulation of polyadenylation in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 36:982-994.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Ohta, N., M. Sanders, and A. Newton. 1978. Characterization of unstable poly (A)-RNA in Caulobacter crescentus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 517:65-75.[Medline]
15 - Rindi, L., N. Lari, M. G. Gil, and C. Garzelli. 1998. Oligo(dT)-primed synthesis of cDNA by reverse transcriptase in mycobacteria. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 248:216-218.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - Salunkhe, P., F. von Götz, L. Wiehlmann, J. Lauber, J. Buer, and B. Tümmler. 2002. GeneChip expression analysis of the response of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to paraquat-induced superoxide stress. Genome Lett. 4:165-174.[CrossRef]
17 - Sarkar, N. 1996. Polyadenylation of mRNA in bacteria. Microbiology 142:3125-3133.[Free Full Text]
18 - Sarkar, N. 1997. Polyadenylation of mRNA in prokaryotes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66:173-197.[CrossRef][Medline]
19 - Steege, D. A. 2000. Emerging features of mRNA decay in bacteria. RNA 6:1079-1090.[Abstract]
20 - Stover, C. K., X. Q. Pham, A. L. Erwin, S. D. Mizoguchi, P. Warrener, M. J. Hickey, F. S. Brinkman, W. O. Hufnagle, D. J. Kowalik, M. Lagrou, R. L. Garber, L. Goltry, E. Tolentino, S. Westbrock-Wadman, Y. Yuan, L. L. Brody, S. N. Coulter, K. R. Folger, A. Kas, K. Larbig, R. Lim, K. Smith, D. Spencer, G. K. Wong, Z. Wu, I. T. Paulsen, J. Reizer, M. H. Saier, R. E. Hancock, S. Lory, and M. V. Olson. 2000. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature 406:959-964.[CrossRef][Medline]
21 - Tümmler, B., J. Bosshammer, S. Breitenstein, I. Brockhausen, P. Gudowius, C. Herrmann, S. Herrmann, T. Heuer, P. Kubesch, F. Mekus, U. Römling, K. D. Schmidt, C. Spangenberg, and S. Walter. 1997. Infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with cystic fibrosis. Behring Inst. Mitt. 249-255.
22 - von Götz, F., S. Häussler, D. Jordan, S. Saravanamuthu, D. Wehmhöner, A. Strüßmann, J. Lauber, I. Attree, J. Buer, B. Tümmler, and I. Steinmetz. 2004. Expression analysis of a highly adherent and cytotoxic small colony variant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from a lung of a patient with cystic fibrosis. J. Bacteriol. 186:3837-3847.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2004, p. 7015-7018, Vol. 186, No. 20
0021-9193/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.20.7015-7018.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Reva, O. N., Weinel, C., Weinel, M., Bohm, K., Stjepandic, D., Hoheisel, J. D., Tummler, B.
(2006). Functional Genomics of Stress Response in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. J. Bacteriol.
188: 4079-4092
[Abstract]
[Full Text]