This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kulbachinskiy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nikiforov, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kulbachinskiy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nikiforov, V.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, November 2004, p. 7818-7820, Vol. 186, No. 22
0021-9193/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.22.7818-7820.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Cold Sensitivity of Thermophilic and Mesophilic RNA Polymerases

A. Kulbachinskiy,1,2* I. Bass,1 E. Bogdanova,1 A. Goldfarb,2 and V. Nikiforov1,2

Institute of Molecular Genetics, Moscow, Russia,1 Public Health Research Institute, Newark, New Jersey2

Received 19 May 2004/ Accepted 11 August 2004


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
RNA polymerase from mesophilic Deinococcus radiodurans displays the same cold sensitivity of promoter opening as RNA polymerase from the closely related thermophilic Thermus aquaticus. This suggests that, contrary to the accepted view, cold sensitivity of promoter opening by thermophilic RNA polymerases may not be a consequence of their thermostability.


arrow
TEXT
 
Thermophilic enzymes are known to work at low temperatures much slower than their mesophilic counterparts. Such cold sensitivity is believed to be a penalty for their more rigid structure, which ensures high protein thermostability. The increased rigidity of thermophilic enzymes is supposed to reduce their conformational mobility at low temperatures and to block structural changes required for catalysis (5, 16). Accordingly, it is anticipated that comparative study of thermophilic enzymes may help to characterize conformational dynamics involved in catalysis.

Promoter opening by RNA polymerase (RNAP)—a crucial step of transcription involving DNA melting around the point of RNA initiation—seemed to conform to this paradigm. It was demonstrated long ago that RNAPs from moderately thermophilic Bacillus species opened promoters at higher temperatures than the RNAP from mesophilic Escherichia coli (13, 15); both the core and {sigma} subunit were responsible for the observed cold sensitivity (12). Using chemical probes, it was shown that thermostable RNAP from Thermotoga maritima opened promoters through a series of isomerization events that were very similar to those observed with the E. coli enzyme but that occurred at higher temperatures (10). Recent studies of Thermus thermophilus (18) and Thermus aquaticus RNAPs (11) confirmed cold sensitivity of promoter opening by thermophilic RNAPs relative to that by E. coli RNAP. It was concluded that cold sensitivity of promoter opening by thermophilic RNAPs was a penalty for adaptation to high temperatures, resulting in more rigid protein structure (18). This conclusion was based, however, on a taciturn assumption that all mesophilic RNAPs were similar to E. coli RNAP, i.e., they were cold resistant. However, scrutiny of limited information available about RNAPs from mesophilic bacteria other than E. coli hinted that this may not be the case (8, 17). To clarify the issue, we compared RNAPs from T. aquaticus and Deinococcus radiodurans. T. aquaticus RNAP was chosen because X-ray structures of T. aquaticus and closely related T. thermophilus RNAPs were available. D. radiodurans RNAP was chosen because this bacterium is the closest mesophilic counterpart of T. aquaticus (7, 9). The strong phylogenetic relationship between T. aquaticus and D. radiodurans suggested that most differences between their RNAPs were likely to result from different temperature adaptations of these bacteria. Surprisingly, many characteristics ascribed previously to thermophilic RNAPs were also found in the mesophilic D. radiodurans enzyme. This demonstrated that comparison of thermophilic RNAPs with E. coli RNAP as the only representative of mesophilic enzymes indeed may lead to misleading conclusions.

We isolated E. coli and D. radiodurans cores from corresponding cells essentially as described previously (1, 3, 4). Recombinant T. aquaticus core and E. coli and T. aquaticus {sigma} subunits were overproduced in E. coli cells containing appropriate plasmids (1, 11). The D. radiodurans rpoD gene was amplified from the genomic sequence (GenBank accession number NP_294640.1) and cloned into the pET28 plasmid. The recombinant protein was overproduced and purified by analogy with the T. aquaticus {sigma}A subunit. E. coli, T. aquaticus, and D. radiodurans holoenzymes were reconstituted by mixing core enzymes with a fivefold excess of {sigma} subunit. We then compared promoter binding, open complex formation, elongation, and termination by these RNAPs. We found that T. aquaticus RNAP differed from E. coli RNAP in most assays used. It displayed reduced stability of promoter complexes at the optimal temperature, was more resistant to rifampin and more sensitive to streptolydigin than the E. coli enzyme, was less prone to abortive RNA synthesis, and showed specific differences in RNA termination (Table 1). As expected, D. radiodurans RNAP was thermosensitive and had a mesophilic temperature optimum. At the same time, the D. radiodurans enzyme behaved very similarly to T. aquaticus RNAP in most other transcription assays (Table 1 and data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Properties of E. coli, T. aquaticus, and D. radiodurans RNAPs

Most importantly, T. aquaticus and D. radiodurans RNAPs possessed a similar cold sensitivity of promoter opening in KMnO4 probing experiments that detect thymines in single-stranded but not in double-stranded DNA. We studied DNA melting by E. coli, T. aquaticus, and D. radiodurans RNAPs in lacUV5 promoter complexes at different temperatures using end-labeled DNA fragment as described elsewhere (2). In brief, holoenzyme of RNAP (100 nM core plus 500 nM {sigma}) was incubated with the promoter DNA (10 nM) in transcription buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9], 40 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2) for 10 min at the temperatures indicated and treated for 10 s with 5 mM KMnO4. The modified thymines were detected by piperidine strand cleavage (2). All three RNAPs melted DNA around the starting point of transcription at 45°C. However, only E. coli RNAP opened the promoter at 20°C (Fig. 1). At 65°C, only T. aquaticus RNAP melted the promoter, which conformed to its higher thermostability in comparison with the mesophilic RNAPs.



View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Permanganate footprints of E. coli (Eco), D. radiodurans (Dra), and T. aquaticus (Taq) RNAPs and hybrid holoenzymes on the nontemplate strand of lacUV5 promoter at 20, 45, and 65°C. Arrows with numbers indicate the positions of hyperreactive thymine residues relative to the starting point of transcription. M lanes are A+G cleavage markers.

To determine the role of the core and {sigma} subunits in cold sensitivity of promoter opening, we performed KMnO4 footprinting experiments with hybrid core-{sigma} holoenzymes. Unfortunately, the E. coli {sigma}70 subunit did not form active holoenzymes with T. aquaticus or D. radiodurans core polymerases (data not shown) (11). However, holoenzymes containing E. coli core and T. aquaticus or D. radiodurans {sigma}A subunits were active and opened lacUV5 promoter at 45°C but not at 20°C (Fig. 1). Thus, cold sensitivity of promoter opening by T. aquaticus and D. radiodurans RNAPs is apparently determined primarily by their {sigma} subunits. It should be emphasized that the KMnO4 probing experiments presented here assessed promoter opening under equilibrium conditions, while it remains possible that T. aquaticus and D. radiodurans RNAPs do possess some differences on intermediate stages of the open complex formation.

It was previously shown that thermophilic T. thermophilus and T. aquaticus RNAPs possess certain defects in RNA elongation compared with the E. coli enzyme (11, 18). To measure the rate of RNA synthesis by E. coli, T. aquaticus, and D. radiodurans RNAPs, we preformed stalled elongation complexes on a DNA template containing T7 A1 promoter and {lambda} tR2 terminator (14) and followed RNA elongation at different temperatures. As is seen from Fig. 2, T. aquaticus and D. radiodurans enzymes reached the tR2 terminator at 37°C as fast as the E. coli enzyme. At 0°C, it took about 15 min to reach the terminator for the E. coli and D. radiodurans enzymes at 100 µM NTP, while the T. aquaticus enzyme failed to reach the terminator even after 24 h at 1 mM NTP. At lower substrate concentrations (100 µM NTP), T. aquaticus RNAP elongation was immeasurably slow (data not shown). Control experiments showed that the T. aquaticus RNAP elongation complex was not dissociated or irreversibly inactivated at 0°C and was fully active after transfer to 37°C (Fig. 2, lane C). The dramatic defect in T. aquaticus RNAP elongation observed at 0°C suggests that elongation requires conformational changes that are severely impeded at low temperature.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. RNA elongation by E. coli (Eco), D. radiodurans (Dra), and T. aquaticus (Taq) RNAPs on the T7 A1 promoter fragment followed by {lambda} tR2 terminator. The starting 20-mer RNA, runoff, and terminated transcripts are shown by arrows. Elongation was measured at different NTP concentrations at 37 and 0°C. The sample in lane C was incubated for 24 h at 0°C with 1 mM NTP and then transferred to 37°C for the additional 5 min.

Our data show that the dramatic cold sensitivity of elongation displayed by thermophilic T. aquaticus RNAP may be related to thermal adaptation. Since D. radiodurans RNAP had the same elongation rates as the E. coli enzyme at all temperatures tested, one can conclude that the cold sensitivity of RNA elongation is the only T. aquaticus RNAP "defect" which is correlated with its thermophily and thus could be regarded as the penalty for its thermostability. In contrast, other functional differences between T. aquaticus and E. coli RNAPs, including cold sensitivity of promoter opening by the thermophilic enzyme, may not be consequences of adaptation to high temperature. These differences may be a neutral character or reflect adaptation to some unknown condition common to T. aquaticus and D. radiodurans and some other bacteria. The high level of homology between T. aquaticus and D. radiodurans RNAPs implies that that the nature of the observed promoter opening defects is similar for both enzymes. At the same time, we also cannot exclude the possibility that these features arise from different sequence and structure determinants that have evolved independently in these bacteria. Ignorance on the adaptive role of the functional peculiarities of T. aquaticus and D. radiodurans RNAPs does not prevent use of these enzymes as natural mutants that have diverged from E. coli by evolutionary design. As was shown for a few other enzymes (6), such mutants may provide useful phenotypes for structural studies that cannot be obtained with standard genetic approaches.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by NIH grant GM30717 to A.G. and by Russian Foundation for Basic Research grant 02-04-48525.

We thank Konstantin Severinov for plasmids, sharing unpublished information, and reading the manuscript. A.K. is grateful to N. Korzheva, L. Minakhin, V. Epshtein, and A. Mustaev for the continued help during the work.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of Molecular Genetics of Microorganisms, Institute of Molecular Genetics, Kurchatov Sq. 2, Moscow 123182, Russia. Phone: 7 (095) 1960015. Fax: 7 (095) 1960015. E-mail: akulb{at}img.ras.ru. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Borukhov, S., and A. Goldfarb. 1993. Recombinant Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: purification of individually overexpressed subunits and in vitro assembly. Protein Expr. Purif. 4:503-511.[CrossRef][Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Brodolin, K., A. Mustaev, K. Severinov, and V. Nikiforov. 2000. Identification of RNA polymerase ß' subunit segment contacting the melted region of the lacUV5 promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 275:3661-3666.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Burgess, R. R. 1969. A new method for the large scale purification of Escherichia coli deoxyribonucleic acid-dependent ribonucleic acid polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 244:6160-6167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Burgess, R. R., and J. J. Jendrisak. 1975. A procedure for the rapid, large-scale purification of Escherichia coli DNA-dependent RNA polymerase involving Polymin P precipitation and DNA-cellulose chromatography. Biochemistry 14:4634-4638.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Fields, P. A. 2001. Protein function at thermal extremes: balancing stability and flexibility. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 129:417-431.
    6. 6
  6. Golding, G. B., and A. M. Dean. 1998. The structural basis of molecular adaptation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:355-369.[Abstract]
    7. 7
  7. Griffiths, E., and R. S. Gupta. 2004. Distinctive protein signatures provide molecular markers and evidence for the monophyletic nature of the Deinococcus-Thermus phylum. J. Bacteriol. 186:3097-3107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. Juang, Y. L., and J. D. Helmann. 1994. A promoter melting region in the primary sigma factor of Bacillus subtilis. Identification of functionally important aromatic amino acids. J. Mol. Biol. 235:1470-1488.[CrossRef][Medline]
    9. 9
  9. Makarova, K. S., L. Aravind, Y. I. Wolf, R. L. Tatusov, K. W. Minton, E. V. Koonin, and M. J. Daly. 2001. Genome of the extremely radiation-resistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans viewed from the perspective of comparative genomics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65:44-79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 10
  10. Meier, T., P. Schickor, A. Wedel, L. Cellai, and H. Heumann. 1995. In vitro transcription close to the melting point of DNA: analysis of Thermotoga maritima RNA polymerase-promoter complexes at 75 degrees C using chemical probes. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:988-994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Minakhin, L., S. Nechaev, E. A. Campbell, and K. Severinov. 2001. Recombinant Thermus aquaticus RNA polymerase, a new tool for structure-based analysis of transcription. J. Bacteriol. 183:71-76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Nikiforov, V. G. 1971. Hybrid RNA polymerases formed from core enzymes and sigma factors of E. coli and thermophilic B. megaterium. FEBS Lett. 16:74-76.[CrossRef][Medline]
    13. 13
  13. Nikiforov, V. G. 1970. Substrate dependent heterogeneity of initiation by RNA polymerase from thermophilic B. megaterium. FEBS Lett. 9:186-188.[CrossRef][Medline]
    14. 14
  14. Nudler, E., M. Kashlev, V. Nikiforov, and A. Goldfarb. 1995. Coupling between transcription termination and RNA polymerase inchworming. Cell 81:351-357.[CrossRef][Medline]
    15. 15
  15. Remold-O'Donnell, E., and W. Zillig. 1969. Purification and properties of DNA-dependent RNA-polymerase from Bacillus stearothermophilus. Eur. J. Biochem. 7:318-323.[Medline]
    16. 16
  16. Vieille, C., and G. J. Zeikus. 2001. Hyperthermophilic enzymes: sources, uses, and molecular mechanisms for thermostability. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65:1-43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    17. 17
  17. Wiggs, J. L., J. W. Bush, and M. J. Chamberlin. 1979. Utilization of promoter and terminator sites on bacteriophage T7 DNA by RNA polymerases from a variety of bacterial orders. Cell 16:97-109.[CrossRef][Medline]
    18. 18
  18. Xue, Y., B. P. Hogan, and D. A. Erie. 2000. Purification and initial characterization of RNA polymerase from Thermus thermophilus strain HB8. Biochemistry 39:14356-14362.[CrossRef][Medline]

Journal of Bacteriology, November 2004, p. 7818-7820, Vol. 186, No. 22
0021-9193/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.22.7818-7820.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Barinova, N., Kuznedelov, K., Severinov, K., Kulbachinskiy, A. (2008). Structural Modules of RNA Polymerase Required for Transcription from Promoters Containing Downstream Basal Promoter Element GGGA. J. Biol. Chem. 283: 22482-22489 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Barinova, N., Zhilina, E., Bass, I., Nikiforov, V., Kulbachinskiy, A. (2008). Lineage-Specific Amino Acid Substitutions in Region 2 of the RNA Polymerase {sigma} Subunit Affect the Temperature of Promoter Opening. J. Bacteriol. 190: 3088-3092 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sevostyanova, A., Feklistov, A., Barinova, N., Heyduk, E., Bass, I., Klimasauskas, S., Heyduk, T., Kulbachinskiy, A. (2007). Specific Recognition of the -10 Promoter Element by the Free RNA Polymerase {sigma} Subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 22033-22039 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Schroeder, L. A., deHaseth, P. L. (2005). Mechanistic Differences in Promoter DNA Melting by Thermus aquaticus and Escherichia coli RNA Polymerases. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 17422-17429 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kulbachinskiy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nikiforov, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kulbachinskiy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nikiforov, V.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»