Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, December 2004, p. 7944-7950, Vol. 186, No. 23
0021-9193/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.23.7944-7950.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Physiological and Gene Expression Analysis of Inhibition of Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough by Nitrite
Shelley A. Haveman,
E. Anne Greene,
Claire P. Stilwell,
Johanna K. Voordouw, and
Gerrit Voordouw*
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Received 11 June 2004/
Accepted 2 September 2004

ABSTRACT
A
Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough mutant lacking the
nrfA gene for the catalytic subunit of periplasmic cytochrome
c nitrite
reductase (NrfHA) was constructed. In mid-log phase, growth
of the wild type in medium containing lactate and sulfate was
inhibited by 10 mM nitrite, whereas 0.6 mM nitrite inhibited
the
nrfA mutant. Lower concentrations (0.04 mM) inhibited the
growth of both mutant and wild-type cells on plates. Macroarray
hybridization indicated that nitrite upregulates the
nrfHA genes
and downregulates genes for sulfate reduction enzymes catalyzing
steps preceding the reduction of sulfite to sulfide by dissimilatory
sulfite reductase (DsrAB), for two membrane-bound electron transport
complexes (
qmoABC and
dsrMKJOP) and for ATP synthase (
atp).
DsrAB is known to bind and slowly reduce nitrite. The data support
a model in which nitrite inhibits DsrAB (apparent dissociation
constant
Km for nitrite = 0.03 mM), and in which NrfHA (
Km for
nitrite = 1.4 mM) limits nitrite entry by reducing it to ammonia
when nitrite concentrations are at millimolar levels. The gene
expression data and consideration of relative gene locations
suggest that QmoABC and DsrMKJOP donate electrons to adenosine
phosphosulfate reductase and DsrAB, respectively. Downregulation
of
atp genes, as well as the recorded cell death following addition
of inhibitory nitrite concentrations, suggests that the proton
gradient collapses when electrons are diverted from cytoplasmic
sulfate to periplasmic nitrite reduction.

INTRODUCTION
Sulfate-reducing bacteria are frequently exposed to nitrite
by interaction with nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria
in anoxic environments. Because sulfate is often the predominant
electron acceptor in anoxic environments (e.g., marine sediments),
sulfate-reducing bacteria are primarily responsible for organic
carbon oxidation. The sulfide produced is then targeted by nitrate-reducing,
sulfide-oxidizing bacteria, which generally use CO
2 as their
sole carbon source (
4). Thus, sulfate-reducing bacteria and
nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria symbiotically catalyze
the oxidation of organic matter with nitrate through a sulfide
intermediate. This symbiosis can potentially be stalled by production
of nitrite by the nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria,
which is a powerful inhibitor of sulfate-reducing bacteria.
Some sulfate-reducing bacteria have a periplasmic nitrite reductase
to prevent and/or overcome this inhibition. Cocultures of a
Desulfovibrio sp. and the nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing
bacterium
Thiomicrospira sp. strain CVO were strongly or transiently
inhibited, depending on the absence or presence of nitrite reductase
activity in the
Desulfovibrio sp. (
6).
Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough was very resistant to inhibition by either nitrite
or strain CVO and nitrate and had high nitrite reductase activity
through the presence of a periplasmic cytochrome
c nitrite reductase
(NrfHA) that reduces nitrite to ammonium. This reaction is purely
detoxifying; no cell growth is associated with the use of nitrite
as an electron acceptor (
16).
We report here the construction of a D. vulgaris nrfA mutant and its physiological properties. The effects of nitrite on gene expression in the mutant and wild-type strains, as recorded by macroarray hybridization (7), were also recorded in order to determine the mechanism by which nitrite inhibits dissimilatory sulfate reduction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials.
Mixed gases, including 5% (vol/vol) H
2, 10% (vol/vol) CO
2, balance
N
2 and 10% (vol/vol) CO
2, balance N
2, were obtained from Praxair
Products, Inc., Edmonton, Canada. Restriction enzymes,
Taq polymerase,
DNA ligase, and Hybond-N membranes were obtained from Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech, Baie d'Urfe, Canada. Superscript II reverse
transcriptase without RNase H was obtained from Invitrogen,
Burlington, Canada. [

-
32P]dCTP (10 mCi/ml; 3,000 mCi/mmol) was
purchased from MP Biomedicals, Inc., Irvine, Calif. Reagent-grade
chemicals were from Sigma, Fisher, or BDH. RNeasy kits, RNAprotect
reagent, and RNase-free DNase were from Qiagen, Mississauga,
Canada. Deoxyoligonucleotide primers were synthesized by University
Core DNA Services, University of Calgary.
Media and culture conditions.
D. vulgaris was cultured in medium C (18), Widdel-Pfennig medium (WP-LS) (26), or modified Coleville synthetic brine (mCSB) (13). Growth in medium C, a rich medium containing 38 mM sodium lactate, 28 mM Na2SO4 and 1 g of yeast extract per liter, was in 5% (vol/vol) H2, 10% (vol/vol) CO2, balance N2 under conditions of gas exchange. WP-LS (23 mM sodium lactate, 28 mM Na2SO4) and mCSB (14 mM sodium lactate, 10 mM Na2SO4) were dispensed in 50-ml aliquots in 125-ml serum bottles, flushed with 10% (vol/vol) CO2, balance N2 and sealed with butyl rubber stoppers. A 2% (vol/vol) inoculum of a freshly grown D. vulgaris culture was used, and cultures were incubated at 30°C. To test the effects of nitrate on D. vulgaris growth and gene expression, 10 mM NaNO3 was added to WP-LS medium from a sterile, anaerobic stock solution at the time of inoculation. For nitrite inhibition of D. vulgaris, NaNO2 was added from a 1 M sterile, anaerobic stock solution to mid-log-phase cultures. Sulfate, sulfide, nitrate, and nitrite concentrations were monitored as described elsewhere (6, 13, 14). The optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of cultures in WP-LS was recorded with a Shimadzu UV-visible spectrophotometer, whereas that of cultures grown in medium C was recorded with a Klett meter.
Construction of an nrfA mutant.
The 1,572-bp gene for Dvu0625 NrfA, the larger subunit of NrfHA nitrite reductase, flanked by 588 bp of upstream and downstream regions was PCR amplified with primers P208-f and P209-r (Table 1). The 2.8-kbp product was cut with XbaI and SacI and cloned in pNOT19 to give pNotNrfA. PCR amplification of this plasmid with primers P210-r and P211-f, cleavage with BamHI, and ligation gave plasmid pNot
NrfA, in which bases +9 to +1581, containing the NrfA coding region, were deleted. Ligation of BamHI-cleaved pNot
NrfA with the 1.4-kb BamHI fragment from pUC19Cm gave pNot
NrfACm, and ligation of NotI-cleaved pNot
NrfACm with the 4.2-kb NotI fragment from pMOB2 containing oriT and sacB gave pNot
NrfACmMob.
Mating of
Escherichia coli S17-1 (pNot

NrfACmMob) and
D. vulgaris was performed on filter disks placed on medium E plates (
18)
containing 10 mM fumarate. The fumarate allows anaerobic respiration
by
E. coli and replaces the 15 mM nitrate added to mating plates
in earlier recipes (
5). We failed to obtain single-crossover
integrants on medium E-nitrate plates, perhaps because
E. coli produces nitrite, which induces transcription of the NrfHA genes.
Two upstream and one downstream (
D. vulgaris NrfA11) single-crossover
integrants were obtained on medium E plates containing chloramphenicol
and kanamycin (
5), as determined by Southern blotting. Growth
of
D. vulgaris NrfA11 in the presence of sucrose and chloramphenicol
followed by colony purification and screening with PCR primers
P208 and P209 gave
D. vulgaris Nrf100, which was again verified
by Southern blotting (results not shown).
Macroarray hybridization.
As described elsewhere, 145 PCR products, representing open reading frames (ORFs) predicted to be involved in energy metabolism on the basis of the genome sequence (8), were spotted on nylon membranes (7). A list of these ORFs is provided in the supplementary material. All methods for array construction, total RNA extraction, reverse transcription to radiolabeled cDNA, hybridization with macroarrays, and calculations have been described in detail elsewhere (7). RNA was extracted from aliquots of uninhibited cultures at mid-log phase and from nitrite-inhibited cultures 15 to 270 min after nitrite addition, when the growth rate was still reduced. For each experimental condition, RNA was extracted from two separate cultures, and each RNA sample was split and hybridized with two arrays. The hybridization data resulting from these four arrays were averaged. Error was calculated as the average deviation of the signals for each spot on the four arrays. The ORFs of downregulated transmembrane electron transport complexes were identified, and motifs were further characterized by doing BLAST searches (1). Transmembrane helices were identified with the TMpred program at http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/TMPRED_form.html (9).

RESULTS
Phenotype of D. vulgaris nrfA.
Growth of the
D. vulgaris nrfA mutant in medium C was indistinguishable
from that of the wild type (Fig.
1A and B). Addition of 5 mM
nitrite to the wild type at mid-log phase resulted in a 1- to
2-h pause, after which growth resumed (Fig.
1C). In contrast,
growth of the
nrfA mutant stopped completely (Fig.
1D), and
the OD
600 dropped following addition of nitrite. Plating on
medium E indicated that 70 h after addition of 5 mM nitrite,
the wild type had a viable count of 1.6 x 10
8 ± 0.2 x
10
8 CFU/ml, whereas the
nrfA mutant had only 1.2 x 10
3 ±
0.5 x 10
3 CFU/ml, indicating that cells had died as a result
of the nitrite treatment.
In WP-LS medium, the wild-type strain grew to a maximum OD
600 of 0.472 ± 0.026 (average of six cultures) in both the
presence and absence of nitrate, which was not used (Fig.
2A and B).
The
nrfA mutant had similar kinetics of growth, utilization
of sulfate, and production of sulfide and grew to the same maximum
cell density as the wild type (OD
600 = 0.496 ± 0.010;
average for six cultures), as shown in Fig.
2D. Addition of
5 mM nitrite to mid-log-phase cultures of the
nrfA mutant led
to complete cessation of growth, as in Fig.
1D, whereas growth
of the wild type was only transiently inhibited, the recovery
time being longer than in medium C. All nitrite was eventually
removed from the culture by the wild-type strain (Fig.
2C).
The average maximum OD
600 for five wild-type cultures with 5
mM nitrite was 0.427 ± 0.029, which is 90% of the value
in the absence of nitrite. Because growth in WP-LS medium is
lactate limited, this indicates that lactate used for nitrite
reduction does not contribute to cell growth. Addition of 0.1
mM nitrite to mid-log-phase
D. vulgaris cultures in WP-LS had
no effect on the rate of growth or sulfate reduction (not shown).
Despite the absence of NrfA, the mutant could reduce low nitrite
concentrations (Fig.
3A). In view of the results of Wolfe et
al. (
27), this residual nitrite reductase activity may be assigned
to DsrAB. At a mid-log-phase biomass concentration of 0.077
g of biomass dry weight liter
1, a residual specific nitrite
reductase activity of 0.19 mmol of NO
2 g
1 h
1 can be calculated. This value is 18-fold less than the 3.5 mmol
of NO
2 g
1 h
1 for the wild type reported
previously (
6), which is in agreement with a value of 3.3 mmol
of NO
2 g
1 h
1 that can be derived from Fig.
2C. Hence, at nitrite concentrations in the millimolar range,
95% of the nitrite reduction activity of wild-type
D. vulgaris can be credited to NrfHA, with the remaining 5% being due to
DsrAB. These different activities allow mid-log-phase
nrfA mutant
and wild-type cells to reduce 0.35 and 6.5 mM nitrite in 24
h, respectively (Fig.
3B). Addition of more nitrite (e.g., 0.6
and 10 mM, respectively) prevented recovery from nitrite inhibition
and led to cell death (e.g., as in Fig.
1D), likely because
this depleted the cells too long from ATP reserves.
The inhibitory concentrations depended on the biomass concentration
at the time of nitrite addition. Cultures with a 2% (vol/vol)
inoculum of the
nrfA mutant and the wild type in WP-LS (i.e.,
approximately 25-fold fewer cells than in mid-log phase) were
inhibited by 0.26 and 2.0 mM nitrite, respectively, added at
time zero. The intrinsic nitrite resistance of
D. vulgaris,
defined as the inhibitory nitrite concentration at vanishing
biomass concentration, was measured as the nitrite concentration
inhibiting growth of single cells on plates into colonies. Approximately
100 CFU were plated on medium E with increasing nitrite concentrations.
No colonies were formed at nitrite concentrations in excess
of 0.04 mM by the wild type and
nrfA mutant (Fig.
3C). This
value is similar to the apparent nitrite dissociation constant
reported for
D. vulgaris DsrAB (
Km = 0.03 mM) (27), confirming
that DsrAB is the likely target of nitrite inhibition.
Effects of nitrate and nitrite on gene expression.
The expression of energy metabolism genes represented on the array was not affected by 10 mM nitrate (Fig. 4A), in agreement with the fact that D. vulgaris does not reduce nitrate. However, addition of 5 mM nitrite in mid-log phase gave upregulation of seven ORFs in five operons and downregulation of 39 ORFs in 17 operons (Fig. 4C). Results for 25 genes are given in Table 2; a complete listing of relative expression levels for all genes on the array is provided in the supplementary material. Genes for cytochrome c nitrite reductase (nrfHA) and hybrid cluster protein 2 (hcp2) were upregulated. Downregulated genes included the sulfate reduction genes sat, ppaC, and apsBA. Expression of the dissimilatory sulfite reductase operon dsrABD was not significantly affected by 5 mM nitrite. Two operons encoding transmembrane electron transport complexes, qmoABC and dsrMKJOP, as well as two operons for ATP synthase subunits were also downregulated (Table 2). Addition of 0.1 mM nitrite, which is rapidly reduced by log-phase cultures of wild-type D. vulgaris, gave a more moderate gene expression response (Fig. 4B, Table 2). The nrfHA and hcp2 genes were upregulated, whereas sat, ppaC, qmoABC, and some ATP synthase genes (Table 2, Dvu0774, -0775, -0776, -0777, -0778, -0779, -0780, -0917, and -0918) were downregulated.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2. Relative expression levels of ORFs up- and downregulated >4-fold in D. vulgaris and NrfA100 mutant cultures in WP-LS, inhibited with 5 and 0.1 mM nitritea
|
Comparison of the gene expression pattern of the wild type and
nrfA mutant indicated a reduced
nrfHA hybridization signal.
The residual signal is due to expression of
nrfH-containing
mRNA as the entire
nrfA gene has been deleted (Fig.
4D; Table
2). Addition of 0.1 mM nitrite gave upregulation of the
hcp2 gene and downregulation of some of the same genes for sulfate
reduction enzymes and membrane-bound electron transport complexes
that are downregulated in the wild type (Fig.
4E; Table
2).
Genes for carbon monoxide hydrogenase (Dvu2286, -2287, and -2288,
cooMKL) and the high-molecular-weight cytochrome (Hmc) complex
(Dvu0531, -0532, -0534, and -0535,
hmcFECB) were uniquely downregulated
in the
nrfA mutant. Quite different from the wild type, addition
of 5 mM nitrite, which is highly inhibitory and causes cell
death (Fig.
1D), gave less extensive gene expression changes
than observed for 0.1 mM nitrite (Fig.
4F; Table
2).

DISCUSSION
Sulfate-reducing bacteria couple the oxidation of hydrogen or
organic compounds (e.g., lactate) to the reduction of sulfate
to sulfide. Cytoplasmic oxidation of two lactate molecules yields
two ATP molecules, which are required for sulfate activation,
through substrate-level phosphorylation (Fig.
5). Additional
ATP is formed by ATP synthase-driven phosphorylation, which
consumes the electrochemical gradient formed by hydrogen cycling
(
15) or equivalent electrochemical processes (
24). As indicated
in Fig.
5, nitrite-induced inhibition of
D. vulgaris growth
is thought to result from (i) inhibition of DsrAB by nitrite
and (ii) collapse of the electrochemical gradient when protons
and electrons are diverted from cytoplasmic sulfate to periplasmic
nitrite reduction.
D. vulgaris DsrAB, which catalyzes the six-electron reduction
of sulfite to sulfide as the final step in sulfate reduction,
slowly reduces nitrite to ammonia (
27), allowing nitrite to
serve as a competitive inhibitor. Blockage of DsrAB may cause
accumulation of sulfite (Fig.
5, HSO
3), and this likely
explains the downregulation of upstream genes in the sulfate
reduction pathway (
sat,
ppaC, and
apsBA) during nitrite inhibition
(Table
2). We were initially surprised to find that the wild-type
and mutant strains have the same intrinsic nitrite resistance
(Fig.
3C). However, given a
Km of 1.4 mM of
Desulfovibrio nitrite
reductase for nitrite (
12), no contribution of NrfHA to nitrite
reduction is expected at nitrite concentrations below 0.1 mM.
The physiological function of NrfHA is thus to allow
Desulfovibrio spp. to survive in environments containing millimolar concentrations
of nitrite. Such concentrations are readily generated when nitrate-reducing,
sulfide-oxidizing bacteria reduce nitrate (
6,
13). Under these
conditions,
nrf-containing sulfate-reducing bacteria are often
only transiently inhibited, whereas inhibition of sulfate-reducing
bacteria lacking
nrf is long-lasting (
6).
The D. vulgaris genes upregulated by nitrite include those for NrfHA and Hcp2 (Table 2). D. vulgaris NrfHA has been reported to be inducible (11) and constitutive (16). The properties and distribution of NrfHA have recently been reviewed (21). Nitrate induces nrfHA in E. coli (25) but not in D. vulgaris, which lacks the nitrate reductase that converts nitrate to nitrite (Fig. 2B). The D. vulgaris genome sequence indicated the presence of hcp2 in addition to hcp1, encoding hybrid cluster protein 1, previously referred to as prismane protein (23). Hcps are induced by nitrate, nitrite, nitric oxide, and/or hydrogen peroxide, suggesting a role in nitrogen metabolism and/or oxidative stress defense (2, 3, 10). The hcp2 gene was strongly upregulated with nitrite in both the wild-type and nrfA mutant strains (Table 2); hcp1 was constitutive. The hcp2 gene was also upregulated with ethanol as the sole electron donor and thiosulfate as the electron acceptor, during inhibition with biocides, and in D. vulgaris hmc and hyd mutants (Haveman et al., unpublished data). Whatever the exact function of Hcps, these results suggest that Hcp1 functions during normal cellular metabolism, whereas Hcp2 augments this function by induction under stress conditions. Lack of hcp2 induction in the nrfA mutant in the absence of nitrite (Table 2) indicates that, contrary to the hmc and hyd mutations, which lead to altered patterns of electron flow (24), the nrfA mutation is not stressful to D. vulgaris in the absence of nitrite. Hence, nitrite reduction appears to be the only physiological function of NrfHA.
Downregulation of two operons for putative electron transport complexes suggests their involvement in the sulfate reduction pathway. The Dvu0848-0849-0850 operon, located 148 bp downstream of the apsBA genes, encodes the quinone-interacting membrane-bound oxidoreductase (Qmo) complex recently isolated from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans (17). Because the Qmo complex does not appear to have a periplasmic component, Pires et al. (17) suggested that it transports electrons from the quinone pool to adenosine phosphosulfate reductase. The close proximity of apsBA and qmoABC genes in the genome as well as the downregulation of both sets of genes with nitrite (Table 2) support this suggestion.
The gene products of the Dvu1290-1289-1288-1287-1286 operon are homologous to subunits DsrMKJOP, encoded by the dsrABEFHCMKLJOPNRS locus for dissimilatory sulfite reductase of Allochromatium vinosum (19). The colocalization of the dsrMKJOP and dsrAB genes in A. vinosum indicates that both operons are involved in sulfide oxidation in this organism. In sulfate-reducing bacteria, DsrMKJOP likely transports electrons to DsrAB for reduction of sulfite to sulfide either from the periplasmic cytochrome c3 network (8) or from the membrane-bound quinone pool. The observation of reduced expression of dsrMKJOP when sulfite reduction by DsrAB is blocked with nitrite (Table 2) is in agreement with this suggestion.
In summary, it appears that the effects of nitrite on D. vulgaris, inhibition of the sulfate reduction pathway at DsrAB and periplasmic consumption of protons and electrons, can be identified from the gene expression response. The former explains downregulation of sat, ppaC, and apsBA, while the latter explains downregulation of qmoABC, dsrMKJOP, and the two atp operons. Nitrite inhibition does not cause downregulation of genes for enzymes involved in lactate oxidation or for cytoplasmic or periplasmic hydrogenases because the electron and proton flow catalyzed by these enzymes is now directed towards nitrite reduction (Fig. 5). The presence of nitrite reductase allows the organism to survive in environments containing millimolar concentrations of nitrite (i.e., as generated by nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria), whereas in its absence such concentrations are lethal.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by Strategic and Discovery Grants
from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of
Canada to G.V.
We thank Veronique Brunelle for experimental assistance.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada. Phone: (403) 220-6388. Fax: (403) 289-9311. E-mail:
voordouw{at}ucalgary.ca.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/. 

REFERENCES
1 - Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipmann. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Beliaev, A. S., D. K. Thompson, T. Khare, H. Lim, C. C. Brandt, G. Li, A. E. Murray, J. F. Heidelberg, C. S. Giometti, J. Yates III, K. H. Nealson, J. M. Tiedje, and J. Zhou. 2002. Gene and protein expression profiles of Shewanella oneidensis during anaerobic growth with different electron acceptors. OMICS 6:39-60.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Briolat, V., and G. Reysset. 2002. Identification of the Clostridium perfringens genes involved in the adaptive response to oxidative stress. J. Bacteriol. 184:2333-2343.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Fossing, H., V. A. Gallardo, B. B. Jørgensen, M. Hüttel, L. P. Nielsen, H. Schulz, D. E. Canfield, S. Forster, R. N. Glud, J. K. Gundersen, J. Küver, N. B. Ramsing, A. Teske, B. Thamdrup, and O. Ulloa. 1995. Concentration and transport of nitrate by the mat-forming sulphur bacterium Thioploca. Nature 374:713-715.[CrossRef]
5 - Fu, R., and G. Voordouw. 1997. Targeted gene replacement mutagenesis of dcrA, encoding an oxygen sensor of the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough. Microbiology 143:1815-1826.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Greene, E. A., C. Hubert, M. Nemati, G. E. Jenneman, and G. Voordouw. 2003. Nitrite reductase activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria prevents their inhibition by nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 5:607-617.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - Haveman, S. A., V. Brunelle, J. K. Voordouw, G. Voordouw, J. F. Heidelberg, and R. Rabus. 2003. Gene expression analysis of energy metabolism mutants of Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough indicates an important role for alcohol dehydrogenase. J. Bacteriol. 185:4345-4353.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Heidelberg, J. F., R. Seshadri, S. A. Haveman, C. J. Hemme, I. A. Paulsen, J. F. Kolonay, J. A. Eisen, N. Ward, B. Methe, L. M. Brinkac, S. C. Daugherty, R. T. Deboy, R. J. Dodson, A. S. Durkin, R. Madupu, W. C. Nelson, S. A. Sullivan, D. Fouts, D. H. Haft, J. Selengut, J. D. Peterson, T. M. Davidsen, N. Zafar, L. Zhou, R. Radune, G. Dimitrov, M. Hance, K. Tran, H. Khouri, J. Gill, T. R. Utterback, T. V. Feldblyum, J. D. Wall, G. Voordouw, and C. M. Fraser. 2004. The genome sequence of the anaerobic, sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough: consequences for its energy metabolism, biocorrosion and reductive metal bioremediation. Nat. Biotechnol. 22:554-559.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Hofmann, K., and W. Stoffel. 1993. TMbase-A database of membrane spanning protein segments. Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 374:166.
10 - Kim, C. C., D. Monack, and S. Falkow. 2003. Modulation of virulence by two acidified nitrite-responsive loci of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Infect. Immun. 71:3196-3205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Mitchell, G. J., J. G. Jones, and J. A. Cole. 1986. Distribution and regulation of nitrate and nitrite reduction by Desulfovibrio and Desulfotomaculum species. Arch. Microbiol. 144:35-40.[CrossRef]
12 - Moura, I., S. Bursakov, C. Costa, and J. J. G. Moura. 1997. Nitrate and nitrite utilization in sulfate-reducing bacteria. Anaerobe 3:279-290.
13 - Nemati, M., G. E. Jenneman, and G. Voordouw. 2001. Mechanistic study of microbial control of hydrogen sulfide production in oil reservoirs. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 74:424-434.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Nemati, M., T. J. Mazutinec, G. E. Jenneman, and G. Voordouw. 2001. Control of biogenic H2S production with nitrite and molybdate. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26:350-355.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 - Odom, J. M., and H. D. Peck, Jr. 1981. Hydrogen cycling as a general mechanism for energy coupling in the sulfate-reducing bacteria, Desulfovibrio sp. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 12:47-50.[CrossRef]
16 - Pereira, I. A. C., J. LeGall, A. V. Xavier, and M. Teixeira. 2000. Characterization of heme c nitrite reductase from a non-ammonifying microorganism, Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1481:119-130.[CrossRef][Medline]
17 - Pires, R. H., A. I. Lourenco, F. Morais, M. Teixeira, A. V. Xavier, L. M. Saraiva, and I. A. C. Pereira. 2003. A novel membrane-bound respiratory complex from Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ATCC 27774. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1605:67-82.[Medline]
18 - Postgate, J. R. 1984. The sulphate-reducing bacteria, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
19 - Pott, A. S., and C. Dahl. 1998. Sirohaem sulfite reductase and other proteins encoded by genes at the dsr locus of Chromatium vinosum are involved in the oxidation of intracellular sulfur. Microbiology 144:1881-1894.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20 - Schweizer, H. P. 1992. Allelic exchange in Pseudomonas aeruginosa using novel ColE1-type vectors and a family of cassettes containing a portable oriT and the counter-selectable Bacillus subtilis sacB marker. Mol. Microbiol. 6:1195-1204.[Medline]
21 - Simon, J. 2002. Enzymology and bioenergetics of respiratory nitrite ammonification. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 26:285-309.[CrossRef][Medline]
22 - Simon, R., U. Priefer, and A. Pühler. 1983. A broad-host-range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in gram negative bacteria. Bio/Technology 1:784-791.[CrossRef]
23 - Stokkermans, J. P. W. G., A. J. Pierik, R. B. G. Wolbert, W. R. Hagen, W.M.A.M. van Dongen, and C. Veeger. 1992. The primary structure of a protein containing a putative [6Fe-6S] prismane cluster from Desulfovibrio vulgaris (Hildenborough). Eur. J. Biochem. 208:435-442.[Medline]
24 - Voordouw, G. 2002. Carbon monoxide cycling by Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough. J. Bacteriol. 184:5903-5911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Wang, H., and R. P. Gunsalus. 2000. The nrfA and nirB reductase operons in Escherichia coli are expressed differently in response to nitrate than to nitrite. J. Bacteriol. 182:5813-5822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26 - Widdel, F., and F. Bak. 1992. Gram-negative mesophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria, p. 3352-3370. In A. Balows, H. G. Truper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder, and K. H. Schleifer (ed.), The prokaryotes, 2nd ed., vol. 4. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y.
27 - Wolfe, B. M., S. M. Lui, and J. A. Cowan. 1994. Desulfoviridin, a multimeric-dissimilatory sulfite reductase from Desulfovibrio vulgaris (Hildenborough) purification, characterization, kinetics and EPR studies. Eur. J. Biochem. 223:79-89.[Medline]
Journal of Bacteriology, December 2004, p. 7944-7950, Vol. 186, No. 23
0021-9193/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.23.7944-7950.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Marietou, A., Griffiths, L., Cole, J.
(2009). Preferential Reduction of the Thermodynamically Less Favorable Electron Acceptor, Sulfate, by a Nitrate-Reducing Strain of the Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans 27774. J. Bacteriol.
191: 882-889
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schwermer, C. U., Lavik, G., Abed, R. M. M., Dunsmore, B., Ferdelman, T. G., Stoodley, P., Gieseke, A., de Beer, D.
(2008). Impact of Nitrate on the Structure and Function of Bacterial Biofilm Communities in Pipelines Used for Injection of Seawater into Oil Fields. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 2841-2851
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kosaka, T., Kato, S., Shimoyama, T., Ishii, S., Abe, T., Watanabe, K.
(2008). The genome of Pelotomaculum thermopropionicum reveals niche-associated evolution in anaerobic microbiota. Genome Res
18: 442-448
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Meyer, B., Kuever, J.
(2007). Molecular analysis of the distribution and phylogeny of dissimilatory adenosine-5'-phosphosulfate reductase-encoding genes (aprBA) among sulfur-oxidizing prokaryotes. Microbiology
153: 3478-3498
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Meyer, B., Kuever, J.
(2007). Phylogeny of the alpha and beta subunits of the dissimilatory adenosine-5'-phosphosulfate (APS) reductase from sulfate-reducing prokaryotes - origin and evolution of the dissimilatory sulfate-reduction pathway. Microbiology
153: 2026-2044
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hubert, C., Voordouw, G.
(2007). Oil Field Souring Control by Nitrate-Reducing Sulfurospirillum spp. That Outcompete Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria for Organic Electron Donors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
73: 2644-2652
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Greene, E. A., Brunelle, V., Jenneman, G. E., Voordouw, G.
(2006). Synergistic Inhibition of Microbial Sulfide Production by Combinations of the Metabolic Inhibitor Nitrite and Biocides. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
72: 7897-7901
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Haveman, S. A., Holmes, D. E., Ding, Y.-H. R., Ward, J. E., DiDonato, R. J. Jr., Lovley, D. R.
(2006). c-Type Cytochromes in Pelobacter carbinolicus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
72: 6980-6985
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wildschut, J. D., Lang, R. M., Voordouw, J. K., Voordouw, G.
(2006). Rubredoxin:Oxygen Oxidoreductase Enhances Survival of Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough under Microaerophilic Conditions.. J. Bacteriol.
188: 6253-6260
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
He, Q., Huang, K. H., He, Z., Alm, E. J., Fields, M. W., Hazen, T. C., Arkin, A. P., Wall, J. D., Zhou, J.
(2006). Energetic Consequences of Nitrite Stress in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough, Inferred from Global Transcriptional Analysis.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
72: 4370-4381
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Redding, A. M., Mukhopadhyay, A., Joyner, D. C., Hazen, T. C., Keasling, J. D.
(2006). Study of nitrate stress in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough using iTRAQ proteomics. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic
5: 133-143
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chhabra, S. R., He, Q., Huang, K. H., Gaucher, S. P., Alm, E. J., He, Z., Hadi, M. Z., Hazen, T. C., Wall, J. D., Zhou, J., Arkin, A. P., Singh, A. K.
(2006). Global Analysis of Heat Shock Response in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough.. J. Bacteriol.
188: 1817-1828
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mussmann, M., Richter, M., Lombardot, T., Meyerdierks, A., Kuever, J., Kube, M., Glockner, F. O., Amann, R.
(2005). Clustered Genes Related to Sulfate Respiration in Uncultured Prokaryotes Support the Theory of Their Concomitant Horizontal Transfer. J. Bacteriol.
187: 7126-7137
[Abstract]
[Full Text]