Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, December 2004, p. 8221-8228, Vol. 186, No. 24
0021-9193/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.24.8221-8228.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Mitchell F. Balish,
Stephanie M. Ross,
Kyungok K. Lee,
Jarrat L. Jordan, and
Duncan C. Krause*
Department of Microbiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
Received 29 June 2004/ Accepted 15 September 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Protein profiles of wild-type and cytadherence mutant M. pneumoniae
|
HMW2 is a large protein predicted to form dimeric coiled coils, as well as trimeric coiled coils with P28, also a product of the hmw2 gene (5, 21). HMW2 is a component of the attachment organelle and appears to be essential for assembly of the electron-dense core (5), which is absent in the hmw2 mutant I-2 (20, 31). Loss of HMW2 also results in failure to localize the adhesin proteins P1 and P30 normally to the attachment organelle (6, 31), reduced cytadherence (20), altered cell morphology (6), and decreased steady-state levels of HMW1, HMW3, P65, and P30 (Table 1) (3, 17, 26). Wild-type recombinant HMW2 restores a normal phenotype to mutant I-2 (10), and a recombinant HMW2 internal-deletion derivative lacking approximately 80% of the protein (HMW2
mid) restores normal cell morphology and stability of HMW3 and P65 in mutant I-2 transformants (4). However, HMW2
mid fails to restore HMW1 stability or proper localization of P1 to the attachment organelle (4), reinforcing the functional association between HMW1 and P1 (13).
In the present study, we report that the stability of HMW2 is likewise dependent upon HMW1. A fourfold decrease in steady-state HMW2 was observed in mutant M6 relative to wild-type M. pneumoniae, the result of accelerated turnover. HMW2 instability in mutant M6 correlated specifically with loss of HMW1, the failure of HMW2 to localize to the attachment organelle, and the absence of an electron-dense core. Recombinant full-length HMW1 restored HMW2 stability and localization, but HMW1 truncated at the C terminus by 112 amino acids did not. Analysis of HMW1 deletion derivatives established more precisely that the C-terminal 41 residues of HMW1 were particularly important for normal function in the development of the attachment organelle.
|
|
|---|
Western immunoblotting and TX fractionation. Steady-state levels of HMW2, resident and recombinant HMW1, and P1 were evaluated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) with 3 and 4.5% polyacrylamide stacking and separating gels, respectively, and Western immunoblotting (12) with HMW1-specific serum (32) at a 1:10,000 dilution, P1-specific serum (6) at a 1:1,000 dilution, or HMW2-specific serum (reference 21 and this study) at a 1:1,000 dilution. Antiserum to HMW2 was prepared as described previously (32) against a peptide corresponding to amino acid residues 1 to 18 conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin.
Pulse-chase analysis. The stability of newly synthesized HMW2 and HMW1 derivatives was assessed as previously described (26) with modifications. Briefly, mid-log-phase cultures (each, 25 ml) were harvested, and the resulting pellets were suspended in 5 ml of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% dialyzed fetal bovine serum and all amino acids except Met. Samples were incubated for 30 min at 37°C with [35S]Met at 67 µCi/ml (>1,000 Ci/mmol; 1 Ci = 37 GBq; Amersham, Piscataway, N.J.), washed with 5 ml of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium-fetal bovine serum containing 1 mM Met at 4°C, suspended in 3 ml of fresh Hayflick or SP-4 medium by passage through a 25-gauge needle, and dispensed in 1-ml aliquots. After incubation at 37°C for the indicated times, cell suspensions were centrifuged, washed three times with cold 10 mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.2), and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. HMW2 loss was quantitated from autoradiograms with Scion Image (Scion Corp., Frederick, Md.). Relative amounts were determined as previously described (2), using a 150-kDa protein observed to be stable as a reference.
Construction of HMW1 deletion derivatives.
We engineered HMW1 deletion derivatives for functional analysis based upon the distribution of a paired Ser motif previously implicated in proteolytic turnover (26) and repeated four times within the C-terminal domain of HMW1 (Fig. 1A). Plasmid pKV37 (Fig. 1D) (9) was digested with EcoRI and BamHI to release a 3,496-bp fragment containing all but the last 112 amino acids of HMW1. This fragment was cloned into the corresponding sites within the modified Tn4001 (Tn4001mod) in pKV74 (13) to create pKV202 (HMW1
1-4). Portions of the 3' end of the hmw1 gene were amplified by PCR (Table 2) with pKV37 as template DNA, digested with BamHI, and ligated into BamHI-digested pKV202 to generate HMW1
4 (Fig. 1B). Downstream PCR primers introduced a BamHI restriction site and an in-frame stop codon, while the upstream primer used to generate HMW1
1 introduced a BamHI site (Table 2). Wild-type and mutant M6 M. pneumoniae cells were transformed with plasmid DNA containing the recombinant transposons as previously described (14); transposon delivery was required because allelic exchange has not been reported for M. pneumoniae.
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic representation of HMW1 and recombinant HMW1 constructs. (A) HMW1 with the sequence of the C-terminal 112 amino acids shown above and paired Ser residues underlined. Regions affected by deletion are represented by patterned boxes. The numbers above each correspond to the four paired Ser residues. Amino acid positions corresponding to each region are indicated below the diagram, and the relative position of the BamHI site is shown for reference (not to scale). (B) HMW1 deletion derivatives, with protein designation indicated to the right for each. (C and D) Schematic of relevant regions of plasmids pKV74 and pKV37 (not to scale). Restriction sites: E, EcoRI; B, BamHI; K, KpnI; Gmr, gentamicin resistance gene.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. PCR primers used for construction of HMW1 deletion derivatives
|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (49K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. (A) Western immunoblot analysis of HMW2 and P1 steady-state levels in wild-type and mutant M6 M. pneumoniae. Mycoplasma samples at the indicated protein concentrations were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western immunoblotting with anti-HMW2 serum (1:1,000) and anti-P1 serum (1:1,000). Lanes: WT, 75, 25 or 12.5 µg of wild-type M. pneumoniae protein, as indicated; M6, 75 µg of protein from mutant M6; M6 + reHMW1, 75 µg of M6 transformant producing full-length recombinant HMW1. Arrowheads indicate HMW2 and P1, while the 200-kDa protein mass marker is shown to the left. (B) Pulse-chase analysis of HMW2 synthesis and turnover in wild-type (WT), mutant M6, and mutant I-2 M. pneumoniae. The arrowheads indicate HMW1, HMW2, pre-P1, and mature P1; time points are given at the top in hours.
|
![]() View larger version (7K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Western immunoblot analysis of HMW2 steady-state levels in wild-type (WT) and mutant M6 M. pneumoniae and M6 producing the indicated HMW1 deletion derivatives (see Fig. 1). Mycoplasma samples were prepared as described above, with equal amounts of protein used for each sample. The arrowhead indicates HMW2.
|
![]() View larger version (127K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Analysis of HMW2-GFP localization in M. pneumoniae mutants I-2 (A) and M6 (B). The left and right panels for each pair are images by merged phase-contrast and fluorescence microscopy, and fluorescence microscopy only, respectively. HMW2-GFP complements the hmw2 gene defect in mutant I-2 (5). Bar, 2 µm.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Phenotype summary of HMW1 deletion derivatives in M. pneumoniae mutant M6
|
1 in mutant M6 were comparable to resident HMW1 in wild-type M. pneumoniae, while HMW1
1-4 and HMW1
4 were lower (Fig. 5); HMW1
2-4, which lacks all but region 1 of the C-terminal domain (Fig. 1A), was extremely unstable (data not shown) and was not considered further here. Like resident HMW1 in wild-type M. pneumoniae (Fig. 6A), full-length recombinant HMW1 exhibited polar, focused fluorescence (Fig. 6E). HMW1
1 likewise exhibited predominantly intense polar fluorescence, although cells with faint diffuse or no fluorescence were apparent (Fig. 6D). HMW1
4, on the other hand (Fig. 6C), had much greater variation from polar to diffuse fluorescence and rendered M6 cells consistently less elongated and more branched than did full-length HMW1 or HMW1
1, both of which restored a near-normal morphology. HMW1
1-4 had little effect on cell morphology as expected (13) and exhibited diffuse, faint fluorescence with occasional discrete foci, indicating an apparent defect in localization (Fig. 6B).
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Western immunoblot analysis of the stability of HMW1 deletion derivatives in mutant M6 M. pneumoniae. Two independent transformants are shown for each HMW1 derivative. Equal amounts of protein were loaded per lane, separated by electrophoresis, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with anti-HMW1 serum (1:10,000). WT, untransformed wild-type M. pneumoniae; M6, untransformed mutant M6; M6 +, M6 M. pneumoniae transformants producing the indicated HMW1 derivative. The large arrowhead indicates HMW1, while smaller arrowheads indicate recombinant HMW1 derivatives.
|
![]() View larger version (67K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Phase-contrast-immunofluorescence analysis of HMW1 localization in wild-type M. pneumoniae (A) and mutant M6 producing HMW1 1-4 (B), HMW1 4 (C), HMW1 1 (D), or reHMW1 (E). For each pair, the merged immunofluorescence and phase-contrast images are shown on the left and the corresponding immunofluorescence images alone are shown on the right. Bar, 2.0 µm.
|
1-4 (Fig. 7C), as expected (13). HMW1
1 largely restored P1 localization (Fig. 7E), but an intermediate pattern of fluorescence was observed with HMW1
4, where fluorescent foci were apparent but largely not polar (Fig. 7D).
![]() View larger version (92K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Phase-contrast-immunofluorescence analysis of P1 localization in wild-type M. pneumoniae (A), mutant M6 (B), and mutant M6 producing HMW1 1-4 (C), HMW1 4 (D), HMW1 1 (E), or reHMW1 (F). For each pair of images, the merged phase-contrast and immunofluorescence images are shown on the left, and the corresponding immunofluorescence images alone are shown on the right. Bar, 2.0 µm.
|
1 partially restored HMW2, while HMW1
1-4 and HMW1
4 had no impact (Fig. 3), prompting the examination of HMW2 localization for each. Technical difficulties made the use of HMW2-GFP in M6 transformants producing recombinant HMW1 deletion derivatives impractical. Rather, we employed immunofluorescence microscopy with affinity-purified HMW2-specific antibodies and a modified blocking procedure to reduce background (see above). Fluorescence was faint but clearly consistent with localization results in Fig. 4 with HMW2-GFP, i.e., polar foci in wild-type M. pneumoniae and dispersed in otherwise untransformed mutant M6 (Fig. 8A and B, respectively). HMW2 likewise exhibited clustered polar fluorescence for HMW1
1 (Fig. 8E) but not HMW1
1-4 (Fig. 8C) and only rarely for HMW1
4 (Fig. 8D). Thus, the C-terminal 41 residues deleted in HMW1
4 were particularly important for HMW1 function in localization of HMW2 to the attachment organelle yet not sufficient to stabilize HMW2 fully.
![]() View larger version (106K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Phase-contrast-immunofluorescence analysis of HMW2 localization in wild-type M. pneumoniae (A), mutant M6 (B), and M6 transformants producing HMW1 1-4 (C), HMW1 4 (D), HMW1 1 (E), or reHMW1 (F). For each pair of images, the merged phase-contrast and immunofluorescence images are shown on the left and the corresponding immunofluorescence images alone are shown on the right. Bar, 1.0 µm.
|
|
|
|---|
The original description of mutant M6 reported only the loss of HMW1 due to a frameshift mutation and the truncation of P30 due to an in-frame deletion (22). Subsequent study of this strain revealed decreased levels of P65 as well (17). Continued characterization has now indicated that HMW2 levels are also reduced. The previous failure to detect a difference in steady-state HMW2 in mutant M6 can probably be attributed to difficulty resolving HMW2 by SDS-PAGE and staining, and problems generating satisfactory HMW2-specific antibodies (unpublished data); until the present study, the latter likewise plagued repeated attempts at immunolocalization and in a previous study prompted the use of a GFP fusion for this purpose (5). Nevertheless, reduced steady-state HMW2 in mutant M6 was readily apparent by Western immunoblotting (Fig. 2A); thus, HMW2 joins HMW1, HMW3, and P65 as components of the attachment organelle which are subject to accelerated turnover in certain mutant backgrounds (references 17 and 26 and this study).
Proteolytic turnover of unincorporated components of protein complexes is a common quality control measure for macromolecular assembly in a variety of bacteria. Examples include the proteins of the Fo subunit of ATPase (1, 16) and complexes of SecY, SecE, and SecG, which associate to form a channel through the inner membrane for protein secretion (18, 24, 34). Similar mechanisms for quality control occur with protein complexes from a variety of microorganisms (25, 27, 29), apparently including the mycoplasmas.
Newly synthesized HMW1 is thought to move from the cytoplasmic, TX-soluble fraction to a transiently TX-insoluble state and then to a stable, insoluble form on the cell surface in wild-type M. pneumoniae (2). This process occurs inefficiently in the absence of HMW2, shifting HMW1 equilibrium to the cytoplasmic fraction, where it is degraded (2, 26). Conversely, the present study demonstrates that HMW2 stability is dependent upon HMW1, while suggesting a dual role for HMW1 in attachment organelle assembly. First, HMW1 is required for localization of P1 to the attachment organelle, as demonstrated previously (13) and reinforced by the finding that recombinant deletion derivative HMW2
mid confers a near-wild-type phenotype to mutant I-2 but fails to stabilize and/or localize HMW1 or localize P1 (4). Likewise, P1 localization in the present study correlated with stabilization of HMW1 and localization of HMW1 to the attachment organelle. Taken together, these observations are consistent with a structural role for HMW1, perhaps associated in its extracellular state in a stable manner with the mycoplasma cytoskeleton. Second, full-length HMW1 is required, though not at wild-type levels (4), to stabilize HMW2 (this study); thus, reduced steady-state HMW1 was sufficient to stabilize HMW2
mid (4). Because HMW1 exists in both intracellular and extracellular states (2, 32) while HMW2 is thought to be strictly intracellular (5), potential direct interaction would apparently be limited to the intracellular HMW1 pool. Alternatively, indirect interaction could occur with extracellular HMW1 through one or more additional proteins. Regardless, stoichiometry does not appear to be a factor in the requirement for HMW1 to stabilize and/or localize HMW2, where, for example, newly synthesized, cytoplasmic HMW1 might act catalytically in a manner analogous to chaperones before its stable association with the cytoskeleton and export to the cell surface.
The C-terminal domain of HMW1 is required for proper localization to the attachment organelle (this study), for normal function in cell morphology (13), for its accelerated turnover in the absence of HMW2 (26), and to stabilize HMW2 (this study). HMW1
1 fully restored HMW2 localization to the attachment organelle in mutant M6 and partially restored HMW2 stability. However, HMW1
4 did not restore HMW2 stability, exhibited a poor capacity to localize properly, and yielded highly variable localization of P1 and HMW2 and cell morphology. Thus, while a fully intact HMW1 C-terminal domain is required to stabilize HMW2 at wild-type levels, the C-terminal 41 residues of HMW1 are particularly important for localization of HMW2 to the attachment organelle at wild-type efficiency. Significantly, preliminary data indicate that formation of the electron-dense core in these transformants exhibits a similar pattern, with core formation correlating with HMW2 stability (unpublished data).
The present study demonstrates a reciprocal dependency between HMW1 and HMW2, indicates a requirement for HMW1 in localization of HMW2 to the attachment organelle, identifies the C-terminal 41 residues of HMW1 as having functional significance, and raises questions about the nature and timing of a potential interaction between HMW1 and HMW2 in attachment organelle biogenesis. As more information emerges regarding the identity of functional domains of each protein, it should be feasible to explore HMW1-HMW2 interactions more directly.
Present address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga. ![]()
Present address: Department of Microbiology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»