Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kumar, A. Articles by Moran, C. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kumar, A. Articles by Moran, C. P., Jr.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, February 2004, p. 1078-1083, Vol. 186, No. 4
0021-9193/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.4.1078-1083.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

-Helix E of Spo0A Is Required for ^A- but Not for ^H-Dependent Promoter Activation in Bacillus subtilis

Amrita Kumar,¹ James A. Brannigan,² and Charles P. Moran Jr.^1*

Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322,¹ Department of Chemistry, Structural Biology Laboratory, University of York, Heslington, York, Y010 5YW, United Kingdom²

Received 2 July 2003/ Accepted 14 August 2003

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion References

 
At the onset of endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis, the DNA binding protein Spo0A activates transcription from two types of promoters. The first type includes the spoIIG and spoIIE promoters, which are used by ^A-RNA polymerase, whereas the second type includes the spoIIA promoter, which is used by RNA polymerase containing the secondary sigma factor ^H. Previous genetic analyses have identified specific amino acids in -helix E of Spo0A that are important for activation of Spo0A-dependent, ^A-dependent promoters. However, these amino acids are not required for activation of the ^H-dependent spoIIA promoter. We now report the effects of additional single-amino-acid substitutions and the effects of deletions in -helix E. The effects of alanine substitutions revealed one new position (239) in Spo0A that appears to be specifically required for activation of the ^A-dependent promoters. Based on the effects of a deletion mutation, we suggest that -helix E in Spo0A is not directly involved in interaction with ^H-RNA polymerase.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion References

 
Initiation of endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis is controlled by the DNA binding protein Spo0A, which activates transcription from several promoters, including spoIIG (11), spoIIE (17), and spoIIA (2, 15), by binding to sites near the -35 region of these promoters. The spoIIG and spoIIE promoters are used by ^A-RNA polymerase, whereas the spoIIA promoter is used by RNA polymerase containing the secondary sigma factor ^H. Previous studies conducted by Buckner et al. (1) and Hatt and Youngman (4) identified a 14-amino-acid region in the C terminus of Spo0A (from residues 227 to 240) important for activation of Spo0A-dependent, ^A-dependent promoters. Specifically single-amino-acid substitutions at positions G227, I229, S233, F236, and V240 result in reduced ability to stimulate transcription of ^A-specific promoters while having no effect on stimulation of ^H-dependent promoters (1, 4). In addition to these mutations that specifically impair ^A-dependent promoter activation, Buckner et al. (1) also report that a mutant form of Spo0A (S231F) suppresses the sporulation defect of H359R and several other substitutions in ^A, again suggesting that the region around residue 231 in Spo0A is important for ^A-dependent promoter activation. Interestingly, all mutations in Spo0A affecting the ability of ^A-dependent RNA polymerase to activate transcription cluster in -helix E, a flexible helix in the C terminus of the protein that is positioned away from the core structure of the protein (7, 18) (Fig. 1). Taken together these results suggest that -helix E perhaps contacts ^A-RNA polymerase when bound to promoters to stimulate transcription.

View larger version (52K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Ribbon diagram of the C-terminal, DNA binding domain of Spo0A. The structure of the Bacillus stearothermophilus Spo0A is based on coordinates from Lewis et al. (7) and is generated by using RasMol version 2.7.1.1. The -helix E is colored blue, and the rest of the structure is red. Regions of the helix deleted in B. subtilis Spo0A are delineated by the numbered amino acid positions. Amino acid positions R226 and T243 correspond to amino acid positions R218 and S235 in B. stearothermophilus Spo0A, respectively.

It is not known whether all the amino acid residues in -helix E that are involved in stimulation of ^A-directed transcription have been identified or whether any of the amino acids in -helix E play a direct role in activation of ^H-RNA polymerase. Therefore, we examined the effects of additional single-amino-acid substitutions and the effects of deletions in -helix E on activation of ^A- and ^H-dependent promoters.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion References

 
Bacterial strains and culture media. Routine microbiological manipulations and procedures were carried out by standard techniques as described by Harwood and Cutting (3). The concentrations of antibiotics used for selection on Luria broth or Difco sporulation media (DSM) were 5 µg/ml for choramphenicol, 100 µg/ml for spectinomycin, and 100 µg/ml for ampicillin. Cultures were in grown in Luria broth, and sporulation was induced by nutrient exhaustion in DSM. Competent cells were prepared and transformed by the two-step method as described by Harwood and Cutting (3).

The B. subtilis strains used (Table 1) are all derivatives of JH642 and contain the trpC2 and phe-1 alleles. Plasmids derived from pCB2 (1) were used for inserting various mutations at the wild-type spo0A locus.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Bacterial strains used in this study

In order to create the spo0A deletion strain (EUAKB78), the 5'-flanking DNA of spo0A was PCR amplified with primers 0AUS5FOR (HindIII end) and 0ADS5REV (BclI end) and was cloned into HindIII-BclI-digested pCB3 (1) to generate plasmid pAK53. pAK53 was linearized with ScaI and was transformed into JH642 as previously described by Buckner et al. (1). Chromosomal DNA was isolated from a spectinomycin (100 µg/ml)-resistant transformant by using the Qiamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, Calif.) and was subjected to PCR to determine if the gene replacement of spectinomycin for spo0A occurred. The following PCR primers were used in combination, 0AUUS5FOR and SpecREV or 0ADS2REVand SpecFOR, to confirm the allelic replacement of the spo0A with the spectinomycin gene.

The QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.) was used to create mutations in Spo0A that resulted in single alanine substitutions. Briefly, pCB2 was used to create single alanine substitutions from amino acid positions 234 to 239 of Spo0A. The combination of FOR and REV primers listed in Table 2 was used to make the single-amino-acid substitutions, and the resulting plasmids for each mutation were subjected to sequencing by using the 0AUS4FOR and 0A3CREV primers to ensure the presence of the desired mutation.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Oligonucleotides used for PCR, sequencing, and mutagenesis

Overlapping PCR was used to create three different deletions within the coding sequence of Spo0A. In deletion 1, amino acids from positions 225 to 244 were deleted, and in deletion 2, amino acids from positions 233 to 241 were deleted, while in the third class of deletion amino acids from positions 229 to 241 were deleted. In the first round of PCR, the 5' end of the coding sequence (from the starting methionine to either amino acid position S225, S233, or I229) was amplified with forward primer 0AUSFOR in combinations with reverse primer 0ADS3REV, 0ADS4REV, or 0ADS5REV. This generated three PCR products that contained overlapping complementary regions at their 3' end to primers 0AUS2FOR, 0AUS3FOR, and 0AUS4FOR primers, respectively. In the second round, the 3' end of the Spo0A coding sequence (from amino acid positions A244 or S241 to S267) was amplified with primer 0AUS2FOR, 0AUS3FOR, or 0AUS4FOR in combination with 0ADS6REV. In the third step, the products of the first- and second-round primers were combined and reamplified with outer primers 0AUSFOR and 0ADS6REV. This gave PCR products that now contained the entire spo0A sequence with deletions incorporated within them. The PCR products obtained from the third round were digested with BclI and HindIII and were cloned into BamHI-HindIII-digested pCB3, thus giving rise to three different integrational vectors (pAK21, pAK22, and pAK23). To confirm that the deletions were in frame with the coding sequence, plasmids pAK21, pAK22, and pAK23 were sequenced with primer 0A3CREV.

Each mutant derivative of pCB2 was linearized with ScaI and was transformed into competent JH642. Chromosomal DNA was prepared from spectinomycin-resistant colonies and was subjected to PCR with primer sets 0AUUSFOR and SpecFOR and 0ADSREV2 and SpecREV to indicate that recombination occurred at the correct location on the chromosome. The resulting PCR fragment was then sequenced with 0AUS4FOR and 0A3CREV to confirm the presence of the desired mutation.

In order to measure the effects that Spo0A mutations had on ^A- and ^H-RNAP holoenzyme-transcribed promoters, each of the mutant strains was transduced with an SPß lysate containing either an spoIIA-lacZ, spoIIG-lacZ, or abrB-lacZ reporter, as previously described by Henriques et al. (5). All strains used are listed in Table 1.

Sporulation assay. Sporulation was induced by medium exhaustion in DSM as described previously (12). Sporulation efficiency was determined in 30-h cultures as the total number of heat-resistant (80°C for 20 min) CFU compared with the total number of CFU before heat treatment. Data presented were from representative experiments. Similar results were obtained in at least three independent experiments.

ß-Galactosidase activity. Cultures were grown in duplicate in DSM with the appropriate antibiotics to initiate sporulation. Two 300-µl aliquots of each culture were collected, i.e., one to measure the optical density and the other to assay for ß-galactosidase activity. Enzymatic activity is reported in Miller units (5).

In vivo mutagenesis with EMS. The strain to be mutagenized was plated on DSM agar containing the appropriate antibiotics and was incubated for 36 h at 37°C. A sterile piece of filter paper with 3 drops of ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) (1.7 mg/ml; Sigma) was placed at the center of the plate. The cultures were further incubated for 24 h at 37°C, and the plates were exposed to chloroform vapor for 15 min to kill all nonsporulating cells. The plate contents were incubated for 48 h at 37°C to allow any spores to germinate. Colonies were seen only with the EMS-mutagenized strain EUAKB38 carrying the deletion 1 derivate of Spo0A. Single colonies (15) were picked from DSM plates and were streaked out to Luria broth plates. Chromosomal DNA was prepared from each of these colonies and was used to transform EUAKB11 (wild type-Spo0A; spoIIA-lacZ). The transformants were selected for spectinomycin resistance (the marker for the spo0A) and were scored for blueness. These transformations revealed that all the suppressor mutations were linked to the spo0A gene.

Chromosomal DNA was prepared from each of 15 strains, and the spo0A gene was amplified with primers 0AUS4FOR and 0A3CREV. The resulting PCR product was sequenced with primers to identify the position of the new mutation. All sequencing was done at the Emory Core DNA facility (Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.).

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion References

 
Identification of a new position in -helix E of Spo0A that is required for ^A-dependent promoter activation. To determine whether additional amino acids in -helix E are involved in stimulation of ^A-dependent promoters and if any of these amino acids play a role in stimulation of ^H-directed transcription, we isolated mutants that produced single alanine substitutions at each position from 234 to 239 in Spo0A. To assay the effects of the single alanine substitutions in Spo0A on expression of Spo0A-regulated promoters, we transduced these mutants with specialized SPß phage lysates that carried either fusions of spoIIG-lacZ (an Spo0A-activated, ^A-dependent promoter), spoIIA-lacZ (an Spo0A-activated, ^H-dependent promoter), or abrB-lacZ (an Spo0A-repressed promoter). We also isolated isogenic transductants of a strain containing a spectinomycin marker linked to the wild-type spo0A allele and of a strain carrying a deletion of the spo0A locus. All of the strains were cultured in DSM, and the accumulation of ß-galactosidase was monitored during endospore formation. Three of the single alanine substitutions (L235A, G237A, and Y238A) had little effect on the expression of spoIIG-lacZ (Table 3). These mutants also formed heat-resistant spores at frequencies similar to that of the wild-type strain (Table 3). However, substitution of mutations F236A and T239A resulted in reduced expression of spoIIG-lacZ and spore formation (Table 3; Fig. 2). The T239A substitution caused increased expression of spoIIA-lacZ and had little to no effect on expression of abrB-lacZ (Table 3; Fig. 2). These latter results indicate that T239A replaced Spo0A functions as least as well as wild-type Spo0A in activating spoIIA transcription and in repressing abrB transcription. Therefore, the T239A substitution probably does not grossly alter structure, stability, or phosphorylation properties of the protein. Evidently, the side chain of T239 is required specifically for activation of the ^A-dependent spoIIG promoter.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 3. Effects of alanine substitutions for amino acid residues 234 to 239 within wild-type B. subtilis Spo0A

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Effect of substitution T239A on the expression of spoIIA-lacZ, spoIIG-lacZ, and abrB-lacZ transcriptional fusions. DSM cultures of each transduced strain, i.e., EUAKB18 (wild-type-0A •), EUAKB58 (T239A-0A ), and EUAKB78 (Null-0A ), were harvested at hourly intervals beginning at about 1 h before the end of the exponential growth, which is indicated as 0 on the time scale. The collected samples were assayed for ß-galactosidase activity indicated in Miller units.

Substitution of alanine for the phenylalanine at position 236 (F236A) of Spo0A also reduced the expression of spoIIG-lacZ (Table 3). However, this substitution also reduced expression of spoIIA-lacZ (Table 3). This substitution did not prevent repression of abrB-lacZ expression; therefore, this form of Spo0A probably accumulates and binds DNA like wild-type Spo0A. Substitution of serine for phenylalanine at position 236 is also reported to have similar ^A- and ^H-dependent effects in an independent screen conducted by Hatt and Youngman (4). However, since replacement of phenylalanine at position 236 with either serine or an alanine reduced transcription from both the ^A-dependent and ^H-dependent promoters, it is not clear whether this substitution defines a position in Spo0A that is directly involved in ^A or ^H promoter activation or whether the substitution has a subtle, indirect effect on accumulation or phosphorylation of the protein. In summary, the effects of the alanine substitutions revealed one new position (T239) that appears to be specifically required for activation of a ^A-dependent promoter and another amino acid (F236) that affects both ^A- and ^H-dependent promoter activation. However, in the latter case we cannot eliminate the possibility of an indirect involvement of F236 in promoter activation.

-Helix E of Spo0A is not required for ^H-dependent promoter activation. Experimental results (1, 4) previously identified amino acid substitutions in -helix E of Spo0A that specifically reduced activation of ^A-dependent promoters; however, no substitutions have been described in this region that specifically affect ^H-dependent promoter activation. Therefore, it is not known whether -helix E is involved directly in ^H-dependent promoter activation. To test the role of -helix E, we used oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis to create alleles encoding three different deletions within this helix (Fig. 3). The deletion limits and the placements of linker glycine residues were designed to minimize the effect of deletions on the remaining structure (Fig. 3). We then tested the effects of the deletions on expression of the Spo0A-regulated promoter-lacZ fusions. All three deletions abolished transcription from the spoIIA and spoIIG promoters (data not shown). However, the three deletion derivatives of Spo0A repressed expression of abrB-lacZ (data not shown), suggesting that these deletion derivatives of Spo0A retained their ability to bind DNA.

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 3. Amino acid sequence alignment of the C-terminal domains from Spo0A and helix E deletion derivatives. Shown is an alignment of the amino acid sequences from positions 224 to 267 in wild-type B. subtilis Spo0A and the homologous positions in three deletion-substitution derivatives of Spo0A. Amino acids regions deleted in the three mutants are represented by gaps, and the corresponding positions in wild-type Spo0A are numbered. The two or three glycine residues that were substituted for the deleted amino acids have been aligned arbitrarily. The -helix E and -helix F of C-Spo0A are represented by bars above the amino acid sequence.

We expected that deletion of -helix E would prevent activation of ^A-dependent promoters, since several amino acids in this region have been shown to be essential for ^A-dependent promoter activation. However, deletion of -helix E also impaired the ability of Spo0A to activate ^H-directed transcription. In order to explore further the possibility that -helix E may be essential for stimulating ^H-directed transcription, we sought to identify intragenic suppressors of the deletions. A selection for sporulation-proficient derivatives of the -helix E deletion strains failed, probably because sporulation would require restoration of both ^A-directed and ^H-directed transcription. However, during this procedure we discovered that a single valine (GTT)-to-alanine (GCT) substitution at position 8 (V8A) in the deletion 1 derivative of Spo0A suppressed the effect of the deletion on ^H-dependent spoIIA-lacZ expression (Fig. 4). The V8A substitution did not suppress the effect of the deletion on spoIIG-lacZ (Fig. 4) expression, nor did it restore formation of heat-resistant spores (data not shown). Therefore, -helix E in the V8A-substituted Spo0A is not required for activation of the ^H-dependent spoIIA promoter, while -helix E is required for activation of the ^A-dependent spoIIG promoter.

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 4. Effect of deletion mutant Spo0A alleles on expression of spoIIA-lacZ, spoIIG-lacZ, and abrB-lacZ transcriptional fusions. DSM cultures of each transduced strain, i.e., EUAKB18 (wild-type-0A •), EUAKB38 (Spo0A1 ), EUAKB82 (Spo0A1+V8A ), and EUAKB78 (null-0A ), were harvested at hourly intervals beginning at about 1 h before the end of the exponential growth, which is indicated as 0 on the time scale. The collected samples were assayed for ß-galactosidase activity indicated in Miller units.

Since -helix E is not required for stimulation of ^H-directed transcription, at least not by the V8A-substituted Spo0A, how does the deletion of -helix E affect ^H-directed transcription and how does the V8A substitution suppress the effect of the deletion on ^H-directed transcription? Immunoblot analyses of Spo0A accumulation during sporulation revealed that the deletion derivatives of Spo0A accumulated to levels that were at least two- to fourfold lower than that of wild-type Spo0A (data not shown). These lower levels of accumulation may have been caused by small decreases in stability of the deletion derivatives of Spo0A and may have been compounded by the requirement of Spo0A for stimulating transcription of its own structural gene (14). However, the small decrease in accumulation of the Spo0A deletion derivatives probably played no role in the reduction of Spo0A-dependent promoter activation. Immunoblot analyses showed that the V8A substitution did not substantially increase the accumulation of Spo0A (data not shown). Nevertheless, the V8A substitution restored activation of the spoIIA promoter by the deletion 1 derivative Spo0A. One possible explanation for these results is that the V8A substitution increases the fraction of the Spo0A that is phosphorylated, which allows the protein to stimulate transcription more efficiently. Consistent with this hypothesis is the observation by Stephenson et al. (13) that N12 of Spo0A is critical for interaction with the Spo0E phosphatase. Two highly conserved aspartate residues, D10 and D11, that form part of the acid pocket at the phosphorylation site are located between N12 and V8 (6). Therefore, it is possible that the V8A substitution may reduce interaction with the Spo0E phosphatase, resulting in higher levels of Spo0A phosphorylation. The equivalent residue of Spo0A V8 is normally a hydrophobic residue in response regulator receiver domains and lies in the first element of the secondary structure, a ß-strand that contributes to the positioning of the ß1-1 loop containing the residue D10-N12, and so this is our preferred explanation.

Other possible mechanisms by which the V8A substitution restores activation of ^H-directed transcription by the -helix E deletion derivative of Spo0A would include creation of an interaction between the N-terminal domain of Spo0A and RNA polymerase that compensates for an interaction with RNA polymerase that was lost upon deletion of -helix E or a model in which the V8A affects interaction between the N- and C-terminal domains of Spo0A. We cannot eliminate the former model, but it seems unlikely that substitution of valine for alanine, which effectively removes side chain volume, would establish a new interaction between proteins and seems likelier that the alanine substitution would eliminate an interaction, such as between Spo0A and Spo0E. We also cannot completely eliminate the latter model. However, if the V8A substitution affects the interaction between the C- and N-terminal domains of Spo0A, the effect on the conformation of the C-terminal domain would likely be very small. This effect would not likely be great enough to compensate for the absence of -helix E if this helix plays a direct role in stimulating ^H-RNA polymerase. Therefore, we conclude that -helix E in Spo0A probably is not directly involved in interaction with ^H-RNA polymerase. If -helix E does not interact with ^H-RNA polymerase, then another region of Spo0A probably interacts with ^H-RNA polymerase. Presently the best candidate for a region of Spo0A that interacts with ^H-RNA polymerase is at the extreme C terminus, where amino acid substitutions at positions 257, 258, and 260 have been shown by Rowe-Magnus et al. (9) and Perego et al. (8) to reduce activation of the ^H-dependent promoter spoIIA. However, as Rowe-Magnus et al. (9) discuss in their paper, they could not eliminate an indirect role for this region in activation of ^H-dependent promoters.

 
This work was supported by Public Health Service grant GM54395 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322. Phone: (404) 727-5969. Fax: (404) 727-3659. E-mail: moran{at}microbio.emory.edu.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion References

 

1
1. Buckner, C. M., G. Schyns, and C. P. Moran, Jr. 1998. A region in the Bacillus subtilis transcription factor S po0A that is important for spoIIG promoter activation. J. Bacteriol. 180:3578-3583.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Burbulys, D., K. A. Trach, and J. A. Hoch. 1991. Initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis is controlled by a multicomponent phosphorelay. Cell 64:545-552.[CrossRef][Medline]
3
3. Harwood, C. R., and S. M. Cutting. 1990. Molecular biology methods for bacillus. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, England.
4
4. Hatt, J. K., and P. Youngman. 1998. Spo0A mutants of Bacillus subtilis with sigma factor-specific defects in transcription activation. J. Bacteriol. 180:3584-3591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Henriques, A. O., B. W. Beall, K. Roland, and C. P. Moran, Jr. 1995. Characterization of cotJ, a ^E-controlled operon affecting the polypeptide composition of the coat of Bacillus subtilis spores. J. Bacteriol. 177:3394-3406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Lewis, R. J., J. A. Brannigan, K. Muchova, I. Barak, and A. J. Wilkinson. 1999. Phosphorylated aspartate in the structure of a response regulator protein. J. Mol. Biol. 294:9-15.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
7. Lewis, R. J., S. Krzywda, J. A. Brannigan, J. P. Turkenburg, K. Muchova, E. J. Dodson, I. Barak, and A. J. Wilkinson. 2000. The trans-activation domain of the sporulation response regulator Spo0A revealed by X-ray crystallography. Mol. Microbiol. 38:198-212.[CrossRef][Medline]
8
8. Perego, M., J. J. Wu, G. B. Spiegelman, and J. A. Hoch. 1991. Mutational dissociation of the positive and negative regulatory properties of the Spo0A sporulation transcription factor of Bacillus subtilis. Gene 100:207-212.[CrossRef][Medline]
9
9. Rowe-Magnus, D. A., M. J. Richer, and G. B. Spiegelman. 2000. Identification of a second region of the Spo0A response regulator of Bacillus subtilis required for transcription activation. J. Bacteriol. 182:4352-4355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10
10. Satola, S., P. A. Kirchman, and C. P. Moran, Jr. 1991. Spo0A binds to a promoter used by sigma A RNA polymerase during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:4533-4537.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11
11. Satola, S. W., J. M. Baldus, and C. P. Moran, Jr. 1992. Binding of Spo0A stimulates spoIIG promoter activity in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 174:1448-1453.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12
12. Schaeffer, P., J. Millet, and J. P. Aubert. 1965. Catabolic repression of bacterial sporulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 54:704-711.[Free Full Text]
13
13. Stephenson, S. J., and M. Perego. 2002. Interaction surface of the Spo0A response regulator with the Spo0E phosphatase. Mol. Microbiol. 44:1455-1467.[CrossRef][Medline]
14
14. Strauch, M. A., K. A. Trach, J. Day, and J. A. Hoch. 1992. Spo0A activates and represses its own synthesis by binding at its dual promoters. Biochimie 74:619-626.[Medline]
15
15. Trach, K., D. Burbulys, M. Strauch, J. J. Wu, N. Dhillon, R. Jonas, C. Hanstein, P. Kallio, M. Perego, T. Bird, et al. 1991. Control of the initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis by a phosphorelay. Res. Microbiol. 142:815-823.[Medline]
16
16. Wu, J. J., M. G. Howard, and P. J. Piggot. 1989. Regulation of transcription of the Bacillus subtilis spoIIA locus. J. Bacteriol. 171:692-698.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
17. York, K., T. J. Kenney, S. Satola, C. P. Moran, Jr., H. Poth, and P. Youngman. 1992. Spo0A controls the ^A-dependent activation of Bacillus subtilis sporulation-specific transcription unit spoIIE. J. Bacteriol. 174:2648-2658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
18. Zhao, H., T. Msadek, J. Zapf, Madhusudan, J. A. Hoch, and K. I. Varughese. 2002. DNA complexed structure of the key transcription factor initiating development in sporulating bacteria. Structure (Camb.) 10:1041-1050.
19
19. Zuber, P., and R. Losick. 1987. Role of AbrB in Spo0A- and Spo0B-dependent utilization of a sporulation promoter in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 169:2223-2230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

---

Journal of Bacteriology, February 2004, p. 1078-1083, Vol. 186, No. 4
0021-9193/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.4.1078-1083.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kumar, A. Articles by Moran, C. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kumar, A. Articles by Moran, C. P., Jr.