Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, April 2004, p. 2466-2475, Vol. 186, No. 8
0021-9193/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.8.2466-2475.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Simone Reinhardt,1 Daniel Schultheiss,2 Thomas Reichart,1 Dirk Schüler,2 Verena Jendrossek,3 and Dieter Jendrossek1*
Institut für Mikrobiologie, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart,1 Max-Planck Institut für Marine Mikrobiologie, Bremen,2 Klinik für Radioonkologie, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany3
Received 26 August 2003/ Accepted 2 December 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Accumulated PHB can be hydrolyzed by the accumulating strain itself during periods of starvation (intracellular PHB hydrolysis by intracellular PHB depolymerases) or by other microorganisms after release of the polymer from the accumulating strain (extracellular PHB hydrolysis by extracellular PHB depolymerases). The differentiation between extra- and intracellular degradation is necessary because PHB can be present in two biophysical conformations. In vivo, the polymer is completely amorphous (native) and is covered by a surface layer that is about one-half the size of a cytoplasmic membrane (1) and consists of proteins (so-called phasins) and phospholipids (6, 22, 34, 38). In Ralstonia eutropha H16 the major phasin protein is PhaP, which is involved in synthesis, morphology, and regulation of PHB synthesis (12, 27, 37, 39, 41, 42). After release of the polymer from the cell (e.g., after cell lysis or solvent extraction) or after removal or damage of the surface layer, the polymer denatures and becomes paracrystalline. For the sake of clarity PHB in its intact intracellular, amorphous form is called native PHB (nPHB), and extracellular, partially crystalline PHB without a surface layer or with a damaged surface layer is called denatured PHB (dPHB). Most enzymes that hydrolyze PHB are specific for one of the two forms (nPHB or dPHB). For example, extracellular PHB depolymerases that are released from PHB-degrading bacteria so that PHB can be used as an exogenous carbon source are able to hydrolyze dPHB. Intracellular PHB depolymerases are necessary for utilization of the previously accumulated PHB by the accumulating strain itself during periods of starvation. They are specific for nPHB and do not hydrolyze dPHB.
About 20 different extracellular dPHB depolymerases (PhaZ) have been characterized during the last decade (for a recent summary see reference 15), and our knowledge concerning intracellular depolymerases has increased only recently (16, 18, 40). For R. eutropha several isoenzymes of intracellular PHB depolymerases (PhaZ1 to PhaZ3) or 3-hydroxybutyrate oligomer hydrolases have been identified (9, 18, 28, 29, 31, 40). Intracellular nPHB depolymerases of R. eutropha are not related to extracellular dPHB depolymerases in terms of their amino acid sequences, but they exhibit significant levels of amino acid similarity to each other and to other putative intracellular PHB depolymerases found in the database (15, 16, 18, 40). None of the PHB depolymerases described previously requires proteins as cofactors. However, Rhodospirillum rubrum appears to be an exception. Hydrolysis of nPHB granules by a partially purified nPHB depolymerase of R. rubrum in vitro was strongly dependent on the presence of a heat-stable factor (activator), but the nature of this compound has never been determined (23, 24). Recently, we were able to purify the activator from soluble cell extracts of R. rubrum (11). In this study we cloned the corresponding activator gene and characterized it by subcellular localization and functional analyses.
|
|
|---|
1,000 lx, 29 to 30°C) in PYI medium, which contained (per liter) 10 g of peptone, 5 g of NaCl, 5 g of yeast extract, 0.2 g of MgSO4 · 7H2O, 5 ml of a phosphate solution (7 g of Na2HPO4 per liter, 8 g of KH2PO4 per liter), and 1 ml of SL8 (containing [per 1,000 ml of double-distilled water] 5.2 g of Na2-EDTA, 1.5 g of FeSO4 · 4H2O, 70 mg of ZnCl2, 0.1 g of MnCl2 · 4H2O, 62 mg of H3BO3, 190 mg of CoCl2 · 6H2O, 17 mg of CuCl2 · 2H2O, 24 mg of NiCl2 · 6H2O, and 36 mg of Na2MoO4 · 2H2O; pH 6.5). The bacteria produced no PHB granules or only a few PHB granules in this medium. For PHB production, bacteria in a PYI medium culture were transferred (0.05 volume) to glass tubes that were filled almost completely with acetate mineral salts medium (MSM), which contained (per liter) 1.6 g of KH2PO4, 2 g of K2HPO4, 0.2 g of yeast extract, 0.4 g of MgSO4 · 7H2O, 0.4 g of NaCl, 0.4 g of NH4Cl, 8 µg of vitamin B12, 1 ml of SL7, 50 mg of CaCl2 · 2H2O, and 5 mg of Fe(III) citrate, as well as 20 mM sodium acetate. The tubes were incubated in the light at 29 to 30°C. For conjugation experiments R. rubrum SmRif and Escherichia coli S17-1 containing the appropriate plasmids were grown in PYI medium and Luria-Bertani medium, respectively. A mixture of 500 µl of fresh PYI medium, 250 µl of the donor culture, and 250 µl of the recipient culture were spotted onto a PYI agar plate and incubated at 30°C overnight. The bacteria were resuspended in PYI medium and diluted with PYI medium (1:10, 1:100), and 100-µl portions of each dilution were plated on selection agar (PYI agar supplemented with 600 µg of streptomycin per ml, 100 µg of rifampin per ml, and 20 µg of kanamycin per ml). Red colonies of R. rubrum transconjugants appeared in the second week of incubation under air at 30°C. Selected colonies were isolated by repeated transfers on selective medium and were grown in liquid cultures in PYI medium or acetate-containing MSM. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmidsa
|
Microscopic analysis.
R. rubrum transconjugants or recombinant E. coli strains in liquid cultures were immobilized on glass by mixing 20 µl of a bacterial suspension with
40 µl of 1% agarose at 50 to 60°C and were covered immediately with a coverslip. Bacteria were visualized with a Zeiss Axioplan fluorescence microscope operated in the phase-contrast or fluorescence mode by using F41-007 Cy3 and F41-54 Cy2 filters for analysis of the PHB granules (Nile red stained) and for green fluorescent protein (GFP)-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) analysis, respectively. If necessary, bacteria were stained with the fluorescent dye Nile red by addition of 0.05 to 0.1 volume of a Nile red solution (10 µg/ml of acetone). Pictures were taken with a digital camera (Coolsnap) and processed with the Metaview/Metamorph software (Visitron Systems).
Isolation of nPHB and dPHB granules. Semicrystalline dPHB was isolated from accumulating cells of R. eutropha H16 by sodium hypochlorite digestion and subsequent solvent extraction of the dried polymer with acetone-diethyl ether (2:1). nPHB granules with an intact surface layer were prepared from crude extracts (French press) of PHB-rich cells of R. eutropha H16 or from recombinant E. coli harboring the PHB biosynthetic genes phaCBA of R. eutropha with or without phaP (17) by two sodium phosphate-buffered glycerol density gradient centrifugation steps as described previously (10). nPHB granules were isolated from PHB-accumulating cells of Chromobacterium violaceum, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus cereus, and R. rubum by the same procedure. The content of PHB in lyophilized cells was determined by gas chromatography after conversion of PHB into the 3-hydroxymethylester by methanolysis and by using benzoate methylester as an internal standard.
Assay of R. rubrum PHB depolymerase activity and activator activity (ApdA). The activity of nPHB depolymerase was assayed by photospectroscopy at 650 nm by using a microtiter plate reader (KC4; Bio-tek Instruments, Inc.), 5- to 20-µl samples in 200-µl assay mixtures at 40°C, and purified soluble nPHB depolymerase of R. rubrum (0.001 to 0.01 mg/ml) (unpublished data) (Fig. 1). Each assay mixture contained 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), 1 mM MgCl2, and 500 µg of nPHB granules purified as described above per ml. nPHB granules were activated for 10 min at 40°C in the presence of trypsin (0.6 µg/ml/test; SERVA, Heidelberg, Germany). Depending on the batch of PHB and on the source of trypsin, significant differences in the resulting depolymerase activity were observed. For activator assays trypsin was replaced by the R. rubrum activator by using quantities sufficient to obtain a rate of nPHB hydrolysis comparable to the rate of hydrolysis of trypsin-activated nPHB granules. If necessary, the depolymerase and activator were diluted with buffer or water. It was not possible to measure activator activity quantitatively. It turned out that there was no linear correlation between the amount of activator and the velocity or degree of hydrolysis of nPHB granules. Therefore, experiments were routinely performed with three different concentrations of the activator (and a constant PHB depolymerase concentration).
![]() View larger version (82K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Reducing, silver-stained SDS-PAGE analysis of purified ApdA and PHB depolymerase of R. rubrum. Lanes 1, molecular mass standard proteins; lane 2, purified His-tagged recombinant ApdA; lane 3, soluble crude extract of R. rubrum; lane 4, purified His-tagged soluble R. rubrum PHB depolymerase; lanes 5 and 5A, two fractions from the last purification step for wild-type ApdA (11). The arrows indicate the position of ApdA.
|
Purification of the activator and cloning of its gene. The activator was purified from soluble cell extracts of a photoheterotrophically grown R. rubrum culture by hydrophobic interaction chromatography (Octyl-Sepharose), chromatofocusing (MonoP), phenol-chloroform extraction, gel filtration (Superdex S75PC), and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (C18-ChromSil ODS 2FE). Forty of 45 N-terminal amino acids could be identified by Edman degradation of the purified activator and were identical to the DNA-deduced sequence of a hypothetical protein (ZP00014946) that has been identified in a genome sequencing project. Two synthetic oligonucleotides, 5'-ATCGATACATATGGCCAAGCAACCCGAGACC (forward) and 5'-TAGGATCCCTTCTGGGTGGTCGCGGCGCGC (reverse), were used as primers for PCR-based (Pfx polymerase-Taq polymerase, 1:0.75) cloning of the activator gene (apdA) in frame into the NdeI-BamHI-digested rhamnose-inducible His-tagged vector pJOE4036, yielding pSN2224. The correct cloning was confirmed by DNA sequencing of both strands. The activator was purified from recombinant E. coli in one step by metal chelate affinity chromatography by using Ni-NTR agarose and was stored in aliquots at 20°C. Reducing sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis after silver staining confirmed that the purified recombinant activator was almost pure (>90%).
EYFP fusion analysis of ApdA. A C-terminal fusion between apdA and a derivative of the GFP, the enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) (BD Clontech), was constructed. EYFP has a slightly modified fluorescence emission maximum but can be detected by the same filter as GFP. The apdA gene, including 190 bp of the upstream region, was PCR amplified from genomic DNA of R. rubrum by using the synthetic oligonucleotides 5'-GGCGACAGCGGCGGGA (forward) and 5'-ATTGGATCCAACTTCTGGGTGGTCGC (reverse) as the primers. The SalI/BamHI-digested purified product containing 171 bp of the upstream region, including the putative native promoter of apdA, was ligated into SalI/BamHI-opened vector pEYFP and transformed into E. coli JM109. Plasmid pEYFP was constructed by ligating the BamHI/NotI fragment of plasmid pEYFP-N1 (BD Clontech) into the BamHI/NotI-opened vector pECFP (BD Clontech), resulting in pEYFP. Correct cloning of the resulting plasmid (pSN2343) was confirmed by DNA sequencing. Recombinant plasmids were isolated, and the fusion was cut with PaeI, filled with Klenow DNA polymerase, heat inactivated, and digested with SpeI. The isolated and modified fusion was cloned into SmaI/SpeI-opened broad-host-range vector pBBR1MCS2, yielding pSN2372, and transformed into E. coli S17-1. Alternatively, pSN2343 was digested with PvuII/SpeI, and the resulting fusion fragment, including the lac promoter of the parent vector, was cloned into SmaI/SpeI-opened pBBR1MCS2, yielding pSN2389, and transformed into E. coli S17-1. The plasmids constructed were transferred to R. rubrum SmRif by conjugation. Isolated transconjugants were grown in PYI medium and in acetate-containing MSM supplemented with 20 µg of kanamycin per ml and were assayed for PHB formation and EYFP fluorescence.
Cloning of the mms16 gene of M. gryphiswaldense MSR-1 and construction of a C-terminal EGFP fusion. A gene with a high level of similarity (70% at the protein level) to apdA of R. rubrum was identified in the preliminary genome assembly of M. gryphiswaldense MSR-1 (7) and was designated mms16 (accession no. BX571783) because of its high level of identity (80% at the protein level) to mms16 of Magnetospirillum sp. strain AMB-1. The mms16 gene of M. gryphiswaldense was amplified from genomic DNA by using primer MPPF2 containing a KpnI recognition site (5'-ATATATGGTACCGTGCGTATACGCAAGTATCTATC) and primer MPPRV1containing a BamHI site (5'-ATATATGGATCCACTTCTTCGAGGCCTT-GACGAAC). The KpnI-BamHI-digested PCR product was ligated into the corresponding restrictions sites of the pEGFP-N2 vector (BD Clontech) to generate plasmid pCS1B. Proper insertion of the in-frame mms16-egfp fusion was verified by sequence analysis of the pCS1B insert. The HindIII-XbaI fragment harboring this construct was excised from plasmid pCS1B and subsequently ligated into the HindIII-XbaI sites of pBBR1MCS2 to generate plasmid pCS11. Plasmids used in XbaI digests were previously propagated and isolated from E. coli strain INV110 (Invitrogen).
|
|
|---|
Heterologous expression of the activator in recombinant E. coli and characterization of the activation mechanism in vitro.
The gene coding for the activator protein, apdA (activator of polymer degradation), was PCR amplified as a C-terminal six-His-tagged fusion protein (calculated Mr, 18.349 x 103) from genomic DNA of R. rubrum by using the sequence information in the database. The PCR product was cloned into the vector pJOE4036 under control of a rhamnose-inducible promoter and was transformed into E. coli DH5
. Recombinant ApdA was expressed in E. coli and was purified from rhamnose-induced cells by affinity chromatography on Ni-NTR agarose (Fig. 1). ApdA migrated at an apparent molecular mass of 22 to 23 kDa, similar to ApdA purified from wild-type R. rubrum.
Purified recombinant ApdA was able to activate nPHB granules in a manner comparable to the manner of wild-type ApdA, as first described by Merrick and Doudoroff (23). Figure 2A shows the hydrolysis of nPHB granules by R. rubrum PHB depolymerase after trypsin activation and after activation with purified ApdA. Both types of activated granules were rapidly hydrolyzed by soluble PHB depolymerase of R. rubrum. However, when a trypsin inhibitor (ovomucoid) was added, only the reaction with trypsin was inhibited; the reaction with ApdA was not inhibited (11, 23). Similar results were obtained if nPHB granules isolated from C. violaceum, B. megaterium, B. cereus, or recombinant E. coli harboring the PHB biosynthetic genes (phaCBA) and the major phasin gene (phaP) were used instead of nPHB granules isolated from R. eutropha. nPHB granules isolated from R. rubrum were not suited very well for ApdA analysis because it was not possible to isolate ApdA-free granules. Therefore, nPHB granules of R. rubrum did not require additional ApdA for activation in vitro. However, nPHB granules of R. rubrum responded to trypsin activation by an increased rate of hydrolysis after addition of soluble PHB depolymerase. nPHB granules from recombinant E. coli without phaP were easily activated by trypsin but required a higher concentration of ApdA and a lag phase of 5 to 10 min before activation became visible by subsequent hydrolysis by soluble PHB depolymerase. From these results we concluded that trypsin and ApdA activate nPHB by different mechanisms. To obtain further experimental evidence for this conclusion, the SDS-PAGE protein profiles of nPHB granules purified from R. eutropha H16, recombinant E. coli with phaCBA, and E. coli with phaCBA and phaP before and after activation by trypsin or ApdA were compared.
The profiles of nPHB granules showed that there was significant proteolytic digestion of the major phasin protein PhaP and of other granule-associated proteins protein after 1 min of trypsin treatment and that the digestion increased after 20 min of trypsin treatment (Fig. 3). In contrast, no digestion was observed with the profiles of ApdA-treated nPHB granules. This is in agreement with the absence of any protease activity of ApdA either with a natural substrate (casein) or with an artificial substrate (N-
-benzoyl-L-arginine-nitranilide) (11). Apparently, the activation effect of ApdA was not caused by proteolysis. We assume that ApdA interacted with the surface layer of nPHB granules in a nonproteolytic manner.
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. In vitro hydrolysis of nPHB granules. (A) nPHB granules from R. eutropha H16 were incubated for 10 min at 40°C (activation) before the hydrolysis reaction was started by addition of soluble PHB depolymerase. In some experiments the hydrolysis reaction for trypsin-activated nPHB was as fast as the ApdA-activated reaction. (B) nPHB granules from R. eutropha H16 with different additions (no preincubation) were hydrolyzed by addition of soluble PHB depolymerase at 40°C. Note the lag time compared to the data shown in panel A. Reactions with depolymerase or activating compounds alone served as controls. Note the different scales in panels A and B. OD 650nm, optical density at 650 nm.
|
![]() View larger version (51K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Influence of trypsin and purified activator on protein profiles of isolated nPHB granules. A reducing SDS-PAGE analysis of nPHB granules purified from R. eutropha (lanes 1 to 6) (11), from E. coli with phaCBA and phaP (lanes7 to 12), and from E. coli with phaCBA but not phaP (lanes 13 to 17) was performed, and the gels were stained with silver. nPHB granules were treated with ApdA or trypsin. The time of activation (1 or 20 min) is indicated at the bottom. A minus sign indicates that neither trypsin nor activator was added. Lanes S contained a molecular mass standard. The arrows indicate the positions of PhaP and degradation products of phasin proteins. nPHB granules after the treatments were heated in the presence of denaturation-loading buffer and centrifuged. Each supernatant was loaded on an SDS-PAGE gel.
|
40% identity) were found with hypothetical proteins of Mesorhizobium loti (40% identity; accession no. NP102799), Ralstonia metallidurans (34%; accession no. ZO00023358), Burkholderia fungorum (29%; accession no. ZP00031181), and R. eutropha (26%; accession no. CAA59734). Low levels of similarity (<25%) were found with PHB-granule-bound proteins, the so-called phasin proteins of several PHB-accumulating bacteria, such as Azotobacter sp. (24%; accession no. CAD42757), Azotobacter vinelandii (24%; accession no. ZP00088789), and others. Phasins are relatively small proteins (Mr,
20 x 103) that are localized in the surface layer of PHB granules and are involved in regulation of PHB synthesis and in determination of the size of PHB granules (34, 37, 38). An alignment of the amino acid sequence of ApdA with the most closely related sequences in the database (August 2003) is shown in Fig. 4. ApdA also corresponded to a highly conserved protein family (COG5490.1) in the conserved domain database. This family comprises several PHB granule-associated proteins, such as PhaP (R. eutropha; accession no. S57610), Gap11 and Gap20 (Methylobacterium extorquens AM1; accession no. AF442748 and AF442749), several hypothetical proteins from M. magnetotacticum, and many other proteins whose functions are unknown.
![]() View larger version (100K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Amino acid alignment for ApdA, Mms16, and related proteins. (A) ApdA, activator of polymer degradation from R. rubrum (accession no. AAO00724); Mms16, Mms16 protein of M. gryphiswaldense (accession no. BX5171783); hypo1Mspm, hypothetical protein of M. magnetotacticum (accession no. ZP00056330); P16Mspm, magnetic-particle-membrane-specific GTPase P16/magnetosome-associated protein of Magnetospirillum sp. strain AMB-1 (accession no. BAB47588). (B) hypMl, hypothetical protein of M. loti (accession no. BAB48585); hypRm, hypothetical protein of R. metallidurans (accession no. ZO00023358); hypBf, hypothetical protein of B. fungorum (accession no. ZP00031181); PhaPRe, PHA-granule-associated protein/phasin of R. eutropha (accession no. AAC78327). The alignments were constructed with ClustalX, version 1.8.1, by using the Gonnet series as a protein weight matrix (gap opening, 10; extension, 0.2) and GeneDoc (shading in conservation mode). The shading indicates the degree of homology, as follows: black, 100% conserved; dark gray, 80 to 100% conserved; gray, 60 to 80% conserved; no shading, less than 60% conserved. The values in the consensus line are phylogenetic tree scores for conserved residues; a lower value is better (i.e., there is less evolutionary cost).
|
In vivo localization of ApdA in R. rubrum determined by fusion to EYFP. ApdA was isolated from soluble cell extracts of R. rubrum and therefore was first assumed to be localized in the cytoplasm. However, cell extracts of the insoluble fractions also contained significant ApdA activity (data not shown). In order to determine the true localization of ApdA in vivo, a C-terminal fusion of ApdA with the EYFP was constructed and cloned into the broad-host-range vector pBBR1-MCS2 as described in Materials and Methods and then transformed into E. coli S17-1. When recombinant E. coli strains harboring the apdA-eyfp fusion with or without the lac promoter of the parent vector were investigated with the fluorescence microscope, only the strain with the lac promoter showed strong fluorescence in the whole cell and exhibited functional expression of the EYFP portion of the fusion protein in the cytoplasm. The construct with the 5' upstream region (171 bp) of apdA but without the lac promoter showed no fluorescence. Apparently, the native promoter of apdA was not present in the cloned 5' upstream region or was not recognized by the E. coli RNA polymerase. Significant ApdA activity was found in soluble cell extracts of the fluorescent E. coli strain. Control cells which harbored only eyfp without ApdA showed strong fluorescence in the cells but had no ApdA activity. We concluded that the apdA-eyfp fusion was functionally expressed in E. coli (from the lac promoter) and that the fusion did not inhibit the activity of ApdA. Both apdA-eyfp fusions (with and without the lac promoter) were transferred to R. rubrum SmRif by conjugation. Selected transconjugants were isolated, were grown photoheterotrophically in PYI medium and acetate-containing MSM, and were analyzed for PHB granule formation and EYFP expression. Since both transconjugants (with and without the lac promoter) showed identical results, only the results obtained with the 5' upstream region of apdA but without lac are shown below. Almost no PHB was formed in PYI medium, and no EYFP-specific fluorescence was visible. When transconjugants were transferred to acetate-containing MSM and incubated anaerobically in the light, several refractive globular particles per cell became visible within a few hours after growth began as determined by microscopic inspection in the phase-contrast mode, and this indicated that there was synthesis of significant amounts of PHB granules (Fig. 5A). This result was confirmed (i) by gas chromatography-based PHB analysis of lyophilized cells (data not shown) and (ii) by staining of the cells with the PHB-specific dye Nile red. All cells contained several red fluorescent granules (Fig. 5B). The red fluorescent inclusion bodies concomitantly exhibited EYFP fluorescence (Fig. 5D). The results clearly indicate that there was colocalization of ApdA with PHB granules. The EYFP fluorescence did not change significantly during prolonged incubation on acetate-containing MSM, except that the number of PHB granules increased after 24 h (data not shown). We concluded that apdA was expressed from its own promoter during PHB synthesis on acetate-containing MSM and that ApdA is a PHB-granule-bound protein in R. rubrum.
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Phase-contrast (A) and fluorescence (B to F) microscopic analyses of recombinant R. rubrum cells harboring an apd-eyfp fusion (A, B, and D) or an mms16-egfp fusion, (C and F) in pBBR1-MCS2. Cells were stained with Nile red and were visualized by using a Nile red- and PHB-specific filter (BP546/FT580/LP590) (B and C) or a GFP- and YFP-specific filter (BP450-490/FT510/LP515) (D to F). Bacteria were grown anaerobically in the light in acetate-containing MSM.
|
ApdA lacks GTPase activity. A GTPase activity has been described for Mms16, and it was assumed that the GTPase activity was essential for the biological function of Mms16 (26). To test whether ApdA has GTPase activity that might be involved in regulation of PHB degradation, we tested purified ApdA for the presence of GTPase activity. The same conditions that were used for the assay of ApdA and PHB depolymerase activity were used for the GTPase assay, except that the magnesium concentration was raised from 1 to 5 mM. However, no evidence of GTPase activity of ApdA was found even if we used the 80-fold concentration of ApdA that was usually necessary to obtain significant activation of nPHB granules (data not shown). Apparently, ApdA does not have significant GTPase activity in vitro, at least under conditions under which ApdA is active in the in vitro assay.
Effect of ApdA on PHB synthesis in vivo. An EYFP fusion analysis of ApdA clearly demonstrated that ApdA was localized at the surface of PHB granules. According to the definition of phasins (34), the R. rubrum activator must be considered a phasin. A comparison of the amino acid sequences revealed low but nevertheless significant similarities to phasin protein PhaP of R. eutropha and other PHB-accumulating bacteria. Several amino acids, including a few hydrophobic residues, two neighboring residues with positive charges, and three glutamate residues, were strictly conserved (Fig. 4). However, PhaP apparently had no ApdA activity (see above). Phasins (PhaP) of other bacteria have been shown to affect the size and number (i.e., the surface/volume ratio) of PHB granules (21, 27, 38, 42). The influence of ApdA on PHB granule formation was analyzed by transformation of the apdA-eyfp fusion (pSN2338) into E. coli HMS174, which already harbored a plasmid with the PHB biosynthetic genes (phaCBA) (17). Recombinant E. coli harboring only the PHB biosynthetic genes (phaCBA) and recombinant E. coli harboring phaCBA and phaP served as controls (Fig. 6A and B). Coexpression of the apdA-eyfp fusion with the PHB biosynthetic genes resulted in formation of very long cells harboring a greatly increased number of PHB granules, but the PHB granules were smaller; this effect was comparable to the effect of PhaP on the surface/volume ratio of PHB granules (Fig. 6) All visible cellular inclusions showed fluorescence of EYFP- and Nile red-specific fluorescence, confirming the localization of ApdA in the PHB-accumulating recombinant E. coli. E. coli expressing the PHB biosynthetic genes alone produced only a few very big PHB granules. Apparently, ApdA has an effect on PHB granule formation comparable to the effect of PhaP in R. eutropha and other PHB-accumulating bacteria if the ApdA activator is overexpressed in E. coli.
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Fluorescence microscopic analysis of recombinant E. coli with phaCBA but not phaP (A), E. coli with phaCBA and phaP (B), and E. coli with phaCBA and pSN2338 harboring the apd-eyfp fusion (C to E). Cells were stained with Nile red and were visualized by using a Nile red- and PHB-specific filter (BP546/FT580/LP590) (A, B, and D) or a GFP- and YFP-specific filter (BP450-490/FT510/LP515) (C). Colocalization of ApdA-EYFP and Nile red-stained PHB is shown in the fluorescence overlay (E). Bacteria were grown in Luria-Bertani medium, and apdA-eyfp (C, D, and E) or phaP (B) expression was induced by adding isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (1 mM). PHB synthesis was induced byshifting the temperature for 10 min to 42°C. Glucose (1%, wt/vol) was added, and cells were cultivated for another 10 h at 39°C. An image stack was recorded at a primary magnification of x1,000, and the resulting pictures were deconvoluted by two-dimensional nearest-neighbor analysis.
|
|
|
|---|
Our results showed that ApdA of R. rubrum has two different activities in R. rubrum. First, ApdA is able to activate nPHB granules isolated from different species, including recombinant E. coli, so that the granules can be hydrolyzed by soluble R. rubrum PHB depolymerase in the in vitro test system. Second, ApdA is an nPHB-granule-bound protein (phasin) in vivo and influences the surface/volume ratio of PHB granules in a manner typical of PhaP (R. eutropha) and other phasin proteins of different PHB-accumulating bacteria (21, 27, 37, 41). At present, it is not clear whether the in vitro action of the activator is an artifact of the depolymerase test system or whether the activator is a cellular tool that modulates the activity of the depolymerase according to the cellular demands. nPHB granules isolated from R. rubrum contain ApdA at the polymer surface and therefore do not require activation in vitro. The fact that PhaP-free nPHB granules from recombinant E. coli can be (slowly) activated by ApdA suggests that activation is an in vitro artifact because these granules do not contain the putative target of activation (phasin) or any other granule-bound protein of the wild type (except PHB-synthesizing enzymes). However, nPHB granules containing phasin (PhaP) could be activated significantly faster and with shorter lag times than phasin-free nPHB (11), and this result is in agreement with the assumption that ApdA has a physiological function. Since R. rubrum has phototrophic metabolism, one could imagine that PHB is produced anaerobically in the light and is reutilized during the night aerobically, which would require a fine-tuned regulation mechanism in which ApdA could be a useful tool. To address this question and to come to solid conclusions, construction and genetic analysis of apdA-deficient mutants will be necessary in the future.
Two classes of proteins with different levels of similarity to ApdA were found in a database search. The first class comprised highly similar sequences of a magnetosome-associated protein (Mms16) found in several magnetotactic bacteria, such as M. magnetotacticum, Magnetospirillum sp. strain AMB-1, and M. gryphiswaldense MSR-1 (7), and several nonmagnetotactic bacteria (M. loti, R. metallidurans, B. fungorum). Magnetosomes are intracellular structures of magnetotactic bacteria, and similar inclusions with unknown functions have been found recently in Shewanella putrefaciens (references 4 and 32 and references therein). As far as we know, magnetotactic bacteria are also able to accumulate PHB. The second class of proteins with low levels of similarity to ApdA contained PHB-granule-associated proteins, such as PhaP of R. eutropha (similarity, <25%). Apparently, ApdA is related to proteins that are present in two different forms of bacterial inclusion bodies, namely, magnetosomes (possibly with Mms16) and PHB granules (with phasins). In order to unravel the function of ApdA in R. rubrum, the question of the true localization of ApdA in vivo was answered by EYFP fusion analysis. As clearly shown in Fig. 5, ApdA is a PHB-granule-bound protein (phasin) that is expressed at significant levels during PHB accumulation. No significant fluorescence was detected within the cytoplasm or at the cell membrane. However, large amounts of ApdA were found in the soluble fraction after disruption of the cells. This result demonstrates that in vitro localization experiments based on separated cell fractions can be misleading.
The high level of similarity of ApdA to Mms16 of magnetotactic bacteria raised the question of the functional equivalence of Mms16 and ApdA. In the study of Okamura et al. (26), the authors provided evidence that Mms16 has GTPase activity, and they assumed that this activity is crucially involved in magnetosome formation. A poorly conserved P-loop-like motif (GXXXGK) is present in Mms16. However, we were not able to detect any GTPase activity even if a high concentration of purified ApdA was used. This in agreement with the absence of a GTP/ATP binding motif (P-loop) in the ApdA amino acid sequence. Cell extracts of M. gryphiswaldense and of recombinant E. coli harboring the mms16-egfp fusion clearly showed ApdA activity in PHB hydrolysis in vitro. Moreover, the fusion transformed to R. rubrum was localized in PHB granules and could not be distinguished from the corresponding ApdA-EYFP fusion. In conclusion, Mms16 is able to functionally replace the activator in R. rubrum. Since magnetotactic bacteria accumulate PHB and since we were able to demonstrate the subcellular localization of Mms16 in PHB granules in vivo in recombinant R. rubrum, it appears to be reasonable to assume that Mms16 in vivo might also be a PHB-bound phasin in magnetospirilla. Further studies are required to analyze the expression and localization of Mms16-EGFP in its native background.
Present address: Klinik für Radioonkologie, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»