Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, May 2004, p. 2636-2645, Vol. 186, No. 9
0021-9193/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.9.2636-2645.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02111
Received 19 November 2003/ Accepted 23 January 2004
|
|
|---|
100-kb ICE encodes resistance to multiple antibiotics and integrates site specifically into the chromosome. SXT excises from the chromosome to form a circular but nonreplicative extrachromosomal molecule that is required for its transfer. Here we found that a significant fraction of freshly isolated SXT exconjugants contained tandem SXT arrays. There was heterogeneity in the size of the SXT arrays detected in single exconjugant colonies. Some arrays consisted of more than five SXTs arranged in tandem. These extended arrays were unstable and did not persist during serial passages. The mechanism accounting for the generation of SXT arrays is unknown; however, array formation was not dependent upon recA and appeared to depend on conjugative transfer. While such arrays did not alter the transfer frequency of wild-type SXT, they partially complemented the transfer deficiency of a
xis SXT mutant, which is ordinarily unable to generate the extrachromosomal intermediate required for SXT transfer. Exconjugants derived from donor strains that harbored tandem arrays of SXT and R391, an SXT-related element, contained functional hybrid elements that arose from recA-independent recombination between the two ICEs. Thus, arrays of SXT-related elements promote the creation of novel ICEs. |
|
|---|
The 99.5-kb SXT element (SXT) is a Vibrio cholerae-derived ICE that was originally identified in a 1993 V. cholerae serogroup O139 clinical isolate, MO10 (28). The MO10-derived SXT, SXTMO10, encodes resistance to sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, chloramphenicol, and streptomycin, and its complete nucleotide sequence has been determined (2). SXTMO10-related elements are now present in most (if not all) V. cholerae O139 and V. cholerae O1 clinical isolates from Asia (15). Some of these SXT-related elements contain different antibiotic resistance genes or even lack antibiotic resistance genes. Recently, SXT-related elements were detected in V. cholerae O1 clinical isolates from Africa (10) and in non-O1 and non-O139 clinical isolates from India (25). Furthermore, SXT has also been found in Providencia alcalifaciens clinical isolates from Bangladesh, indicating that SXT elements are not unique to V. cholerae (15). In the laboratory, SXT transfers by conjugation to a variety of gram-negative bacteria, including V. cholerae and Escherichia coli.
SXT encodes a tyrosine recombinase (Int) that catalyzes its integration into the 5' end of prfC, a gene encoding peptide chain release factor 3 (17). SXT excision from the chromosome also requires Int and is greatly facilitated by a recently described Xis protein (7). Deletion of either int or xis from SXT nearly eliminates SXT transfer, suggesting that the circular extrachromosomal form of SXT is a required intermediate in its transfer (7). Both SXT integration and excision are under the control of SXT-encoded transcriptional activators, SetC and SetD, which also activate the expression of the transfer functions (2, 7). SetC and SetD expression is repressed by a lambda CI-like repressor, SetR. SetR-mediated repression was recently found to be alleviated by the SOS response to DNA damage in a RecA-dependent fashion (3).
R391 is an ICE originally isolated in 1972 in South Africa from Providencia rettgeri that mediates resistance to kanamycin and mercury (9). R391 and several related IncJ elements integrate into prfC, the same chromosomal locus used by SXT. In fact, SXT and R391 are genetically and functionally related (14). Comparison of the nucleotide sequences of these two ICEs showed that they consist of a conserved set of genes that mediate regulation, excision/integration, and conjugative transfer of the respective ICEs (1). Insertions into this shared common backbone confer element-specific properties such as resistance to particular antibiotics. SXT and R391 do not exclude each other, and in cells harboring both elements, SXT and R391 are found integrated in tandem fashion on the chromosome (14). In cells that harbor tandem SXT-R391 arrays, each element can excise and transfer independently of the other.
In the present study, we found that SXT transfer into E. coli and V. cholerae recipients often resulted in the formation of extended tandem SXT arrays. These arrays had variable numbers of constituent SXTs and were sometimes greater than 500 kb in size. Donor strains harboring both SXT and R391 yielded hybrid ICEs in exconjugant cells. Conjugative transfer from donors containing SXT and R391 appeared to be required for formation of hybrid ICEs, but homologous recombination appeared to play no role in their generation. Our findings suggest that tandem ICE arrays may be a source of ICE diversity, creating novel genetic combinations from preexisting elements.
|
|
|---|
prfC mutants E. coli VI31 and VI47 were created as previously described (7). Bacterial strains were routinely grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth at 37°C on a roller drum incubator and were maintained at 80°C in LB broth containing 15% (vol/vol) glycerol. Antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: ampicillin, 100 µg/ml; chloramphenicol, 20 µg/ml; kanamycin, 50 µg/ml; nalidixic acid, 40 µg/ml; streptomycin, 200 µg/ml; sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim (SXT), 160 and 32 µg/ml, respectively; tetracycline, 12 µg/ml. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
|
Molecular biology techniques. Plasmid DNA was prepared with either a Qiaprep Spin miniprep kit or a Qiaprep miniprep kit (Qiagen), and chromosomal DNA was prepared with the G Nome DNA kit (Q-Biogene) as described in the manufacturer's instructions. Southern blotting was performed as described previously (27) with probes conjugated to horseradish peroxidase and detected with a chemiluminescent substrate (Amersham). The attP probe was the 600-bp BstBI fragment of pVI8A (7). The PCR assays to characterize the structure of SXT, R391, or the hybrid elements were performed with the primers described in Table 2 in 20-µl PCR mixtures with a HotStarTaq master mix kit (Qiagen) by using 1 µl of a mixture of a colony resuspended in 8 µl of LB broth as a template. The PCR conditions were as follows: (i) 15 min at 95°C; (ii) 30 cycles of 20 s at 95°C, 30 s at 50°C, and 30 s at 72°C; and (iii) 2 min at 72°C. E. coli chromosomal DNA used for contour-clamped homogenous electric field gel electrophoresis (8) was prepared by following the method of Heath et al. (13). After digestion by restriction enzymes, large E. coli restriction fragments were separated in a 1% agarose gel (Invitrogen) for 30 h by using a CHEF-DR II system (Bio-Rad) with the following settings: initial time, 1 s; final time, 40 s; voltage, 5 V/cm. Electrophoresis buffer was 0.5x Tris-borate-EDTA, which was maintained at 14°C during electrophoresis. Real-time quantitative PCR experiments were carried out as previously described (7) to measure the percentages of cells in a culture that contained unoccupied attB sites (EattBF and EattBR primers) and the SXT or R391 attP sequence (SXTJF and SXTJR primers). The amounts of both attB and attP were normalized to the amount of chromosomal DNA in each sample and expressed as the number of sites per 100 chromosomes.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. DNA sequences of oligonucleotides used in this study
|
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Quantification of unoccupied attB and attP sites by real-time quantitative PCRa
|
![]() View larger version (60K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Tandem arrays of SXTs. (A) Southern blot analysis of five pairs of Tetr Sxtr exconjugants resulting from five independent mating experiments between E. coli MG1655 prfC::SXT and E. coli CAG18439. The donor and recipient strains were mated for 6 h at 37°C on LB agar medium without selection. The purified total genomic DNAs of the Tetr Sxtr exconjugants were digested with EcoRI/EcoRV and analyzed by Southern blot hybridization with the 600-bp BstBI fragment of pVI8A containing attP from SXT as a probe. The molecular sizes in kilobases correspond to the fragments containing the attL (6.5 kb, EcoRV), attP (4.0 kb, EcoRI/EcoRV), and attR (1.2 kb, EcoRI/EcoRV) junction fragments. (B) Contour-clamped homogenous PFGE of SalI or SpeI restriction patterns of E. coli CAG18439 (Sxts), HW220 (Sxtr), VI186 (Sxtr), and VI218 (Sxtr). The gel electrophoresis was carried out for 30 h at 5 V/cm. The size marker (Marker) was SmaI-digested chromosomal DNA of Staphylococcus aureus NCTC8325. The molecular sizes indicated to the right of the panel are in kilobases. The numbers indicated to the left of the bands on the HW220, VI186, and VI218 restriction patterns correspond to the copy numbers of SXT in each fragment. The size of the fragments 1 to 5+ observed in the VI186 restriction pattern are, respectively, 125, 224.5, 324, 424.4, and 522.9 kb or more for SalI, and 165.9, 265.4, 364.8, 464.3, and 563.8 kb or more for SpeI. (C) Southern blot analysis of 10 Kanr Sxtr exconjugants (VI336 to VI345) resulting from a mating between V. cholerae MO10 and V. cholerae E4. E. coli VI186 was used as a control. The fragments containing the V. cholerae attL and attR are shown.
|
We wondered whether tandem SXT arrays formed in SXT's natural host, V. cholerae, as well as in E. coli. Southern blot analysis of exconjugants resulting from a mating between the V. cholerae clinical isolate MO10 (27), used as a donor, and V. cholerae E4 (12), used as a recipient, revealed that 2 of 10 exconjugants harbored tandem SXT arrays (Fig. 1C). This result indicates that tandem SXT arrays form in V. cholerae as well as in E. coli and that E. coli is a suitable SXT host to study this phenomenon.
To investigate the stability of SXT tandem arrays in E. coli, VI186 was cultivated for 5 days with two daily dilutions into fresh LB liquid medium (>200 generations) without selection for the SXT markers. After this time, DNA was isolated from this culture (now called VI218) and the copy number of SXT was analyzed by PFGE as described above. In VI218, the mean copy number of SXT appeared to be one, since only a single band (like that in HW220) was detected (Fig. 1B). This indicates that the high SXT copy number present in VI186 decreased under nonselective conditions. On the other hand, single integrated SXTs were not found to amplify even in the presence of antibiotic selection. Growth of HW220 in LB broth containing various concentrations of sulfamethoxazole (from 160 µg/ml to 2.5 mg/ml) and trimethoprim (from 32 µg/ml to 512 µg/ml) did not promote SXT amplification as measured by attP quantification by real-time quantitative PCR (data not shown).
Formation of SXT arrays does not require recA or prfC. Several mechanisms could account for the formation of tandem SXT arrays. Serial SXT transfer from multiple donor cells (or even a single donor cell) to a single recipient strain could lead to the formation of arrays by recA-dependent recombination between an incoming element and an already integrated SXT. To assess the role of homologous recombination in the formation of tandem SXT arrays, the E. coli recA mutant strain KB1 was used as a recipient in mating experiments with the recA+ donor strain VI166. Quantification of attP percentages in exconjugants revealed that 2 of 10 exconjugants tested carried tandem SXT arrays (data not shown), indicating that recA is not required for the formation of SXT arrays.
We previously found that prfC, the SXT primary integration site, was not absolutely required for SXT integration and that SXT can integrate into alternative sites (7). We excluded the possibility that the SXT integration site within prfC was required for SXT array formation by using VI31, a
prfC derivative of E. coli MG1655 as a recipient (Table 1). Eight of ten exconjugants derived from a mating of VI166 and VI31 harbored SXT tandem arrays. This was seen as the amplified attP-containing fragment in Southern blot analysis of DNA from these exconjugants (Fig. 2A). Similarly, when VI47, a recA
prfC mutant, was used as a recipient, an amplified attP-containing fragment was detected in 1 of 2 exconjugants tested (Fig. 2B). Together, these data indicate that neither the SXT primary integration site prfC nor homologous recombination is required in the formation of tandem SXT arrays. Instead, we hypothesize that multiple integrations of circular SXTs occur by Int-mediated site-specific recombination into the attL or attR of an already integrated SXT.
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Tandem arrays in recA and prfC mutant strains of E. coli. Southern blot analyses of Tetr Sxtr exconjugants resulting from mating experiments involving a recA+ prfC strain (VI31) (A) or a recA prfC strain (VI47) (B) as the recipient. E. coli VI166 (BW25113 prfC::SXT) was used as a donor strain in both experiments. The donor and recipient strains were mated for 6 h at 37°C on LB agar medium without selection. The purified total genomic DNAs of the Tetr Sxtr exconjugants were digested with EcoRI/EcoRV and analyzed by Southern blot hybridization with the 600-bp BstBI fragment of pVI8A containing attP from SXT as a probe. The molecular sizes in kilobases correspond to the fragments containing the attL (6.5 kb, EcoRV), attP (4.0 kb, EcoRI/EcoRV), and attR (1.2 kb, EcoRI/EcoRV) junction fragments in E. coli HW220 (CAG18439 prfC::SXT) used as a control strain.
|
xis SXT mutant.
To investigate the effect of tandem SXT arrays on the frequency of exconjugant formation, we isolated 10 randomly selected fresh Sxtr exconjugants derived from a mating where the donor strain harbored a single copy of SXT. These exconjugants were then used as donors in new mating assays, and the percentage of attP was measured for each of these donors. As shown in Fig. 3, there was no significant correlation between the frequency of SXT transfer and the percentage of attP in the exconjugants used as donors.
![]() View larger version (8K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of the tandem arrays on the transfer frequency of SXT xis. The frequencies of exconjugant formation per donor were obtained by dividing the number of exconjugants (Nalr Sxtr CFU) by the number of donor cells (Tcr CFU). In all of the mating experiments, the recipient strain was E. coli BI533 (MG1655 Nalr). The donors were E. coli exconjugants obtained from mating VI200 (MG1655 prfC::SXT xis pXis) x CAG18439 ( ) or from mating VI166 (BW25113 prfC::SXT) x CAG18439 ( ). The expression of xis by pXis in the donor strain VI200 was induced with 0.02% arabinose during the mating experiments on LB agar plates. Real-time quantitative PCR was used to determine the percentage of attP sequences resulting from SXT excision and tandem SXT array formation. Triplicate measurements were performed on each sample, and the means and standard deviations (horizontal bars) are presented for each assay. DNA templates were prepared from overnight LB broth cultures.
|
xis SXT donor, the formation of the extrachromosomal form of SXT was a key step in limiting SXT transfer, since the
xis SXT cells were 3 orders of magnitude less efficient as donors than cells harboring a single copy of wild-type SXT (7). We wondered whether tandemly arranged
xis SXTs could at least partially complement the transfer deficiency of a single
xis SXT donor. An experiment similar to the one described above was carried out to explore this possibility. An initial donor strain harboring a single
xis SXT in which Xis was provided in trans was used to generate
xis SXT exconjugants. These exconjugants were then used as donors. The frequency of exconjugant formation from these new donors varied between 2.6 x 107 and 4.2 x 106 exconjugants/donor (a 16-fold variation). There was a general correlation between the percentage of attP in the donor strain and the frequency of exconjugant formation (Fig. 3). The percentage of attP in 5 of the 10 donors was nearly undetectable (Fig. 3), and these strains were extremely inefficient donors. These strains likely contained a single
xis SXT, given the very low excision frequency previously observed for the single
xis SXT (7). The percentage of attP for the five other donors was significantly higher, and these strains were more efficient donors (Fig. 3). The overall trend of the data presented in Fig. 3 shows that tandem
xis SXT arrays can, at least in part, rescue the transfer deficiency of
xis SXT mutants. This result could be meaningful in hosts in which SXT is unable to excise.
Tandem SXT and R391 form hybrid elements.
It is not clear how strains harboring
xis SXT generate extrachromosomal circular SXT DNA or why transfer was higher from strains carrying tandem
xis SXT arrays. One possibility to explain the latter observation is that the production of Int, required for excision, is higher in cells harboring tandem arrays; however, we previously showed that Int overexpression does not increase the frequency of excision and transfer (7). Another possibility is that tandem arrays allow for different processes for production of the extrachromosomal SXT DNA required for its transfer. For example, extrachromosomal SXT might arise through homologous recombination between adjacent integrated elements. Alternatively, a replicative process, analogous to that used by tandemly arranged CTX prophages (19) might generate extrachromosomal SXT DNA. Both of these processes are expected to yield hybrids containing sequences from adjacent elements. To explore whether either of these models could explain how extrachromosomal SXT DNA is generated by
xis ICE arrays, we tested whether hybrid ICEs would indeed form by using tandem arrays of SXT and R391 (Kanr Merr). The structure of the hybrids would vary for the two models. If replication initiating at the 5' oriT and extending to the 3' oriT in a tandem array generates the extrachromosomal DNA, only one hybrid element would arise from donor cells containing
xis SXT-
xis R391 arrays (Fig. 4A). Alternatively, if transfer from xis-deleted arrays depends upon homologous recombination, then many different hybrid elements would arise from donor cells containing
xis SXT-
xis R391 arrays, since these ICEs share large segments of identical DNA.
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Analysis of hybrids formed by recombination between SXT and R391. (A) Schematic representation of the structures of the tandem arrays SXT-R391 and R391-SXT and predicted hybrid ICEs formed by the oriT-to-oriT replication-based mechanism. (B) Schematic representation of the structures of SXT and R391. mer, aph, sulII, and dfr18 encode, respectively, resistances to mercury, kanamycin, sulfamethoxazole, and trimethoprim. The asterisks indicate the positions of the oriT in SXT and the probable oriT in R391. (C) Amplification of sequences specific to SXT and R391. The fragments A (452 bp) and C (449 bp) are specifically amplified from the left part of SXT and R391, respectively, with the primer sets VISLF-VISLR3 and VISLF-VISLR2 (Table 2). The fragments B (509 bp) and D (511 bp) are specifically amplified from the right part of SXT and R391, respectively, with the primer sets VISRF-VIRR and VISRF-VISRR2. mer is a 1,371-bp fragment amplified from R391 withMER104A and MER103B. It covers the middle of the mer operon of R391. The fragments s037 (523 bp) and s052 (242 bp) are specific to SXT and were amplified with the primer sets 10SF13-SXT1-13 and YND2-ORF16, respectively. The sizes of the ladder (L) are given in kilobases. (D) Schematic representation of the structures of the isolated hybrid ICEs. The structure of the hybrids was deduced from the antibiotic resistance phenotype and from the pattern of SXT- and R391-specific fragments detected by PCR, as shown in panel A. The positions of the amplified fragments and the genes encoding the antibiotic resistance are indicated. The precise position of the point of recombination in each hybrid is not known, but it is deduced from the presence or absence of the markers tested. The gradient from white to dark gray indicates the fragment within which the recombination probably took place to generate the hybrids. , xis mutation.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Mobility properties of hybrid elements
|
xis elements. We constructed a
xis R391-
xis SXT array and a
xis SXT-
xis R391 array in a recA E. coli strain, yielding VI227 and VI228, respectively (Table 1)
xis donors containing R391-SXT arrays. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Frequency of transfer of the kanamycin and SXT markers
|
xis SXT-
xis R391 array cannot be the sole explanation for transfer from such arrays nor for the generation of hybrid elements. All of the hybrid ICEs tested were capable of transfer to new hosts (Table 4). We performed similar experiments with the same donor strains but with a recA E. coli recipient to verify that homologous recombination did not take place in recipient cells. The transfer frequencies of both markers were comparable to those observed in the experiments involving the recA+ recipient (Table 5). We isolated two distinct hybrid elements, CB5 and CB6, from 48 randomly selected Sxts Kanr exconjugants. CB5 was derived from the VI227 donor, and CB6 was derived from the VI228 donor (Fig. 4D). Thus, homologous recombination in recipient cells is not required in the formation of hybrid ICEs.
|
|
|---|
The heterogeneity in SXT copy number in fresh exconjugants was observed in quantitative PCR assays and Southern blots measuring the amount of attP in exconjugants as well as in PFGE analyses. The percentages of attP sites in exconjugants were never integer multiples of 100%, as expected for discrete SXT copy numbers. The fact that we did not detect such values reflects the variation in the sizes of the SXT arrays among cells from individual exconjugant colonies. The attP percentage measured by this PCR assay represents the mean value of the SXT copy number. Thus, even if strains have similar attP percentages, the distribution of SXT copy number in the cell populations may vary. Although an idea about the distribution of SXT copy number cannot be gleaned from the quantitative PCR analyses, the PFGE analysis, as shown in Fig. 1B, provides information regarding this distribution.
We found that the percentage of unoccupied attB sites remains relatively constant, varying from 1.32 to 3.21%, irrespective of the percentage of attP sites (i.e., of the presence or size of SXT arrays) in a strain. The relative stability of the excision frequency may indicate that entire SXT arrays excise as a single circular molecule by recombination between the most distal attL and attR sites flanking the array. Recombination involving internal attP sites between adjacent SXTs in an array could be inhibited due to interactions with Xis, since this protein apparently inhibits recombination between attP and attB, preventing SXT integration (7).
Although formation of tandem SXT arrays appears to occur frequently in exconjugants from both E. coli and V. cholerae, these arrays were transient. Preliminary observations suggest that tandem SXT arrays are stable in the absence of recA (data not shown). Homologous recombination between the elements in a tandem array may lead to reductions in array size. We were unable to find SXT tandem arrays in V. cholerae Sxtr clinical isolates (data not shown), suggesting that arrays are also unstable in natural isolates.
SXT is not the only ICE to form tandem arrays, R391 arrays were also found in freshly derived exconjugants (data not shown). Furthermore, tandem arrays of the 105-kb clc element, an ICE derived from Pseudomonas sp. strain B13, which contains genes for chlorocatechol degradation, have been reported previously (20). Interestingly, Ravatn et al. reported a correlation between the clc copy number in exconjugants and their capability to grow on chlorobenzene as the sole carbon source and suggested that the selective pressure exerted by the substrate influenced the clc copy number (20). In contrast, our work suggests that tandem arrays of SXT or R391 arise as a consequence of the conjugative process itself, since we were unable to detect SXT arrays in a strain that initially contained a single copy of SXT, even on sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim-supplemented medium.
Several conjugation-dependent mechanisms could explain the formation of SXT arrays. Tandem arrays could form after transfer of several copies of the element from a single donor cell to a single recipient cell. This could occur if a concatemer of several copies of SXT was transferred to a recipient. Alternatively, a single donor may transfer several copies of single SXT to the same recipient. The formation of SXT arrays could also occur following transfer of a single SXT from several donors to a single recipient cell. Given the homology of SXT transfer-related genes to those of conjugative plasmids, we assume that a single-stranded SXT, generated by a rolling-circle-like process, is transferred from donor to recipient.
It was previously shown that SXT and R391 are able to use an attL or attR site for integration (14). Since we found that recA was not required for the formation of SXT arrays, if multiple transfers of SXT account for the generation of the arrays, SXT integration into the recipient chromosome probably occurs by an Int-mediated site-specific recombination event into the attL or attR site of a previously integrated element. We found that prfC, the SXT primary integration site, is not required for the formation of SXT arrays. Therefore, if multiple rounds of SXT transfer occur in a
prfC mutant already containing an SXT, the novel attL or attR sites are sufficient for SXT integration. Given the relatively low frequency of transfer of SXT and R391, it seems improbable that multiple donors transfer SXT to the same recipient. However, it is possible that there is some period of time after a recipient has acquired SXT, during which it is transiently highly proficient as a donor. When SXT has just entered a new host cell, the level of the repressor SetR may not be sufficient to repress expression of the tra genes. Epidemic spread of F-like conjugative plasmids from recent exconjugants has been reported (30). Perhaps SXT arrays form after a burst of SXT transfer from recent recipients to new recipients and to former donors.
Tandem SXT-R391 arrays in donor cells can lead to the formation of hybrid ICEs in exconjugants. Each hybrid ICE we identified was able to excise and transfer by conjugation to new recipients. Some of these hybrids, like AD1 and AD2, confer resistance to SXT and likely to mercury as well, two phenotypes specific to each parental element. Therefore, heterogeneous tandem ICE arrays facilitate the generation of ICEs with novel combinations of properties and contribute to the plasticity of this family of elements. Although the mechanism generating these hybrid elements is still unknown, we showed that neither homologous recombination nor oriT-to-oriT replication is required in their formation. Since SXT and R391 both contain orthologues of the Bet recombination protein found in several bacteriophages (54% identity of SXT S065 and R391 Orf68 with Bet protein of phage
) (2, 4), we hypothesize that these recombinases play a role in the formation of the hybrid ICEs.
This work was supported by funds from NIH grant AI42347, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the NEMC GRASP Center (grant P30DK-34928).
|
|
|---|
. Mol. Microbiol. 41:311-323.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»