Journal of Bacteriology, January 2005, p. 19-22, Vol. 187, No. 1
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.187.1.19-22.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Departamento de Biotecnología Microbiana, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, CSIC, Campus de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain
|
|
|---|
Alkanes are saturated, linear hydrocarbons. Their chain lengths can vary from 1 carbon atom (in methane) to more than 50 carbon atoms in length. Well-known examples are octane and dodecane, etc. Alkanes constitute about 20 to 50% of crude oil, depending on the source of the oil. However, many living organisms, such as bacteria, plants, and some animals, also produce them. As a result, alkanes are widespread in nature, and many microorganisms have evolved enzymes to use them as a carbon source. Alkanes, however, are chemically inert and must be activated before they can be metabolized. In the presence of oxygen, activation is usually achieved by oxidation of one of the terminal methyl groups to generate the corresponding primary alcohol, which is further oxidized by dehydrogenases to render fatty acids.
Several unrelated enzymes can catalyze the terminal activation of alkanes. The best known of these enzymes is the Pseudomonas putida GPo1 alkane hydroxylase complex, which consists of an integral membrane hydroxylase (a monooxygenase named AlkB) and two soluble proteins (named rubredoxin [AlkG] and rubredoxin reductase [AlkT]). Rubredoxin reductase transfers electrons from NADH to rubredoxin, which in turn transfers the electrons to the membrane-bound alkane hydroxylase (for reviews, see references 15 and 22). AlkB transfers one oxygen atom from O2 to one of the terminal methyl groups of the alkane molecule, rendering an alcohol, while the other oxygen atom is reduced to H2O by the electrons transferred by rubredoxin. P. putida GPo1 AlkB oxidizes alkanes containing between 5 and 12 carbon atoms (C5 to C12 alkanes). However, the substrate specificity of this enzyme is rather relaxed, and it can oxidize many other molecules as well. Besides hydroxylating terminal methyl groups in aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons, AlkB generates epoxides from alkenes and other chemicals with a terminal double bond, oxidizes alcohols to aldehydes, and catalyzes demethylation and sulfoxidation reactions (21, 23). Oxidation is regio- and stereospecific, which opens doors for many applications in fine chemistry. For example, when acting on a compound with a terminal double bond, AlkB produces an (R)-epoxide with a high enantiomeric excess. Optically active epoxides can be used to generate a number of chemicals that are useful precursors from which to derive several value-added products. The setup of a cost-effective high-scale process based on this enzyme is no simple task, since many practical issues hamper its productivity. Some of these problems are substrate uptake, toxicity of the substrate and/or the product generated, uncoupling, oxygen mass transfer, low turnover with some compounds, and product recovery. B. Witholt's research group at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (Zürich, Switzerland) is dedicated to finding solutions to these problems (14, 21). One direction, though not the only one, has been to gain a deeper understanding of the enzyme itself. As can be expected, the highest efficiency of AlkB is achieved with some of its natural substrates (octane and nonane), but its activity towards other compounds of biotechnological interest is often significantly lower. There are several ways to improve its catalytic properties towards substrates of interest. One way is to investigate natural AlkB variants that may have different catalytic properties (10). Other alternatives are mutagenesis and directed evolution, strategies that would strongly benefit from the identification of the substrate-binding pocket of AlkB. However, the three-dimensional structure of AlkB is still unknown, since all attempts to obtain crystals have failed thus far. A combination of the analysis of AlkB-related proteins with the selection of substrate range mutants has finally allowed the proposal of an AlkB topology model that locates the catalytic site and explains substrate discrimination.
While P. putida GPo1 oxidizes only C5 to C12 alkanes, most alkane-degrading bacteria assimilate alkanes containing more than 10 carbon atoms (C12 to C20 or even C30 alkanes). The majority of these strains contain alkane hydroxylases that are clearly related to P. putida GPo1 AlkB (10, 11, 15, 16, 19). Although sequence comparisons between these AlkB homologs have not allowed the identification of amino acids involved in substrate binding, these comparisons have been useful in strengthening previous conclusions about AlkB topology based on analyses of hydrophobicity and of gene fusions with reporter genes. These results led to the proposal that AlkB is an integral membrane protein with six transmembrane segments that leave some amino acid stretches facing the periplasm and others facing the cytoplasm (Fig. 1) (18). AlkB is a non-heme diiron monooxygenase that shares sequence similarity with a large class of integral membrane fatty acid desaturases and with the P. putida xylene monooxygenase, all of which contain a number of highly conserved histidine residues that interact with two iron atoms that are thought to participate in the O2 activation required for the alkane oxidation reaction (6, 8). The conserved histidines are essential for AlkB activity (7), and in the topology model, all face the cytoplasm (18). These findings tell us how alkanes are oxidized but not how they are recognized.
![]() View larger version (47K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Model for the AlkB alkane hydroxylase. The enzyme is proposed to have six transmembrane helices arranged in a hexagonal distribution that would define a long, hydrophobic pocket into which the linear alkane molecule can slip. The four histidine clusters (H) believed to bind the two iron atoms (Fe) would lie on the cytoplasmic side. In P. putida GPo1 AlkB, residue W55 lies in transmembrane helix 2 and extends its bulky arm towards the hydrophobic pocket (left). This hampers the proper insertion of alkanes longer than C13. The replacement of W55 by a serine residue (S55) (right), which has a shorter arm, allows longer alkanes to enter the pocket without impeding the proper alignment of the terminal methyl group relative to the histidine clusters. Sizes are not to scale. The soluble components of the alkane hydroxylase complex, rubredoxin and rubredoxin reductase, are not shown. The model is modified from reference 20 with permission.
|
The search for the catalytic pocket of AlkB enzymes has raised many interesting observations. The observation regarding the diversity and distribution of this class of enzymes is perhaps one of them. Some bacterial species have only one alkane hydroxylase, while other ones have two, three, or even more alkane hydroxylases. This diversity can be expected if the enzymes differ, for example, in their substrate specificities, as occurs with Acinetobacter sp. strain M1 (13). However, the exact nature of the difference may not be straightforward. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, the two AlkB-related alkane hydroxylases have very similar substrate ranges (9), but they are induced at different moments of the growth phase (exponential or early stationary phase) (5), which suggests that the two enzymes are different in unknown aspects other than their substrate ranges.
Close to 60 AlkB homologs are known to date, and they show high sequence diversity (15). Interestingly, there is no clear linkage between the diversity of these genes and that of the bacterial species from which they were isolated. For example, AlkB homologs from fluorescent pseudomonads are almost as diverse as the entire collection of AlkB-related genes (15). This diversity is indicative of a wide horizontal transfer of genes coding for this class of enzymes. An interesting case is that of A. borkumensis AP1, a hydrocarbonoclastic bacterium that assimilates very few substrates besides alkanes and makes up a large part of the biomass in oil-polluted marine environments (3). This strain has two alkane hydroxylases, one of them being very similar to the P. aeruginosa PAO1 AlkB2 enzyme and the other being highly related to the P. putida GPo1 AlkB enzyme (16). The gene encoding the latter enzyme is flanked by other genes involved in alkane metabolism, genes forming a cluster that appears to have been mobilized to other bacterial strains and that may well be the origin of the alkane degradation genes present in the OCT plasmid originally isolated from P. putida GPo1 (16, 17). Finally, AlkB-related alkane hydroxylases are found not only in soil and water bacteria but also in some unexpected hosts. The finding of a functional alkane hydroxylase in M. tuberculosis H37Rv was not anticipated (10), since this bacterium is believed to grow only inside its mammalian hosts.
The wide distribution of alkane degradation genes suggests that alkane degradation is a useful trait. However, in most cases, alkanes have been found to be nonpreferred growth substrates, and the induction of the alkane degradation pathways is subject to a strong catabolite repression effect by many other growth substrates (2, 4, 5, 12, 24). Furthermore, at least for P. putida GPo1, growth at the expense of alkanes leads to high expression of the alkB gene, which is detrimental to cell growth (1). Perhaps alkane degradation genes are useful to scavenge the low hydrocarbon concentrations that bacteria are likely to find in different environments but may pose some problems when they are induced to high levels. We should not forget that alkane degraders, even hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria, such as A. borkumensis, normally thrive in unpolluted environments where alkanes synthesized by algae, plants, and other organisms are present at low concentrations. In summary, recent progress has clarified many aspects of alkane degradation by bacteria but has raised many new questions, as well. Clearly, there is still much to be learned about the biodegradation of hydrocarbons.
The views expressed in this Commentary do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or of ASM.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»