Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, May 2005, p. 3421-3430, Vol. 187, No. 10
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.187.10.3421-3430.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Isabel Delany,1
Gunther Spohn,1,
Rino Rappuoli,1 and
Vincenzo Scarlato1,2*
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Unit, Chiron Vaccines, 53100 Siena,1 Department of Biology, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy2
Received 19 November 2004/ Accepted 2 February 2005
|
|
|---|
-methylene-
-butyrolactone (MBL), an inducer of NADPH-quinone oxidoreductase, to wild-type N. meningitidis cells specifically resulted in further activation of transcription of the PmdaB promoter and more repression of transcription of the PcrgA promoter. No such regulation was observed when MBL was added to crgA-deficient cells, indicating that the transcriptional response to MBL is CrgA mediated. Under the same experimental conditions, no regulation of transcription by either CrgA or MBL was detected at the pilus and capsule genes. The role of CrgA in the regulation of gene expression during the infectious cycle of N. meningitidis is discussed. |
|
|---|
It has been reported that in the absence of epithelial cells, crgA is expressed at low levels from two transcription start sites, P1 and P2, which map upstream of and within the CREN/Rep2 element, respectively. RNA analyses led to the hypothesis that transcription starting at P2 is responsible for inducing crgA expression when N. meningitidis comes into contact with target cells (7). As a consequence, it has been proposed that the product of this gene, CrgA, represses the expression of several genes, including the pilC1, pilE, and sia genes involved in adhesin, pilin, and capsule biosynthesis, respectively. However, there are reasons to doubt aspects of the previous model. For example, the transcript starting at the P2 site poorly resembles the 24/12 GG-N10-GC consensus sequence characteristic of a sigma 54-dependent promoter (1). Furthermore, in N. meningitidis the sigma 54 factor encoded by the rpoN gene is inactive (17, 29), and in vitro the P2 promoter appears to be transcribed by the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase containing sigma 70, the housekeeping sigma factor (4). Although it has been suggested that the P1 and P2 transcriptional start sites of the crgA gene arise from two distinct promoters, no functional evidence has been provided yet, and the nature of the mapped 5' ends of RNA remains unclear.
CrgA has been reported to function by binding to the promoters of the crgA and pilC1 genes (both harboring a CREN/Rep2 element), as well as the pilE and sia genes (both devoid of a CREN/Rep2 element), repressing transcription upon adhesion of bacteria to target epithelial cells (5). This suggested that, independent of the CREN/Rep2 element, CrgA regulates all four promoters by a similar mechanism (3, 5-7), possibly by binding to a T-N11-A motif characteristic of other LysR regulators (9).
In this paper, we report functional identification of the crgA gene promoter and provide evidence that the CREN/Rep2 repeat element is not involved in initiation of gene transcription. We show that CrgA is a regulatory protein controlling transcription both as a repressor and as an activator of overlapping and divergent promoters. Furthermore, activation and repression of transcription controlled by CrgA are enhanced by the addition of an inducer of NADPH-quinone oxidoreductase to N. meningitidis cells. It is likely that this inducer, or a similar inducer, activates the CrgA protein to control the expression of sets of genes; however, transcription of pilus and capsule genes appeared to be unaltered irrespective of CrgA and
-methylene-
-butyrolactone (MBL).
|
|
|---|
cultures were grown in Luria-Bertani medium, and when required, ampicillin, kanamycin, and chloramphenicol were added at final concentrations of 100, 25, and 30 µg/ml, respectively. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
|
-32P]dATP (Amersham) and a T7 sequencing kit (Pharmacia).
Construction of chromosomally located transcriptional lacZ fusions.
To generate transcriptional lacZ fusions of the promoters studied at a chromosomal location between two converging ORFs, NMB1074 and NMB1075, a series of plasmids for allelic exchange in N. meningitidis strains were constructed (Table 1). A plasmid consisting of a promoterless lacZ gene and the ermAM erythromycin resistance genes flanked by upstream and downstream regions for allelic replacement was generated by cloning fragments into the multiple-cloning site of the pSL1190 vector in the following order: a 510-bp SpeI-XhoI fragment consisting of the upstream flanking region amplified from MC58 chromosomal DNA with primers Fla-UP-L and Fla-UP-R (Table 2), a 1.1-kb XhoI-PstI fragment carrying the ermAM genes amplified from plasmid pAT110 using primers Eryt-DO and Eryt-UP, a 3.4-kb SmaI-BamHI fragment carrying the lacZ gene from pCMVß, and a 909-bp BamHI-XmaI fragment consisting of a downstream flanking region amplified from the MC58 chromosome with primers Fla-DO-L and Fla-DO-R. This plasmid was named pSL-Fla-Ery. The promoter region of crgA or portions of this region were then amplified with primer pairs Pcrg1R-N-Pcrg1L, Pcrg2R-N-Pcrg1L, Pcrg3R-N-Pcrg1L, Pcrg4R-N-Pcrg1L, and Pcrg1R-N-Pcrg2L and cloned as an NsiI-SphI fragment in pSL-Fla-Ery. The resulting plasmids were designated pSL-Pcrg1, pSL-Pcrg2, pSL-Pcrg3, pSL-Pcrg4, and pSL-Pcrg5, respectively (Table 1). These plasmids were used for transformation of the MC58 strain. Transformants were first selected for erythromycin resistance and then tested for the double-crossover at the flanking regions by PCR using primer pairs Fla-UP-C-Ery-DO-C and Fla-DO-C2-LAC-DO-C. The resulting strains were wtA (MC-PcrgA1),
35 (MC-PcrgA2),
10 (MC-PcrgA3),
P (MC-PcrgA4), and
R (MC-PcrgA5), respectively (Table 1).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Primers used in this study
|
R (MC-PCrgA5). Transformants were selected for kanamycin resistance and analyzed by PCR for correct insertion by a double homologous recombination event. The resulting mutant was named
RCrgA (MC-CPcrgA5). Complementation of CrgA was achieved by insertion of a copy of the crgA gene under the control of the inducible promoter Ptac and the LacI repressor in the noncoding region of the
RCrgA (MC-CPcrgA5) chromosome between the converging ORFs NMB1428 and NMB1429. To do this, a 500-bp XmaI/NsiI fragment downstream of NMB1428 and a 430-bp BamHI/SpeI fragment upstream of NMB1429 were amplified with oligonucleotides Com1 and Com2 and oligonucleotides Com3 and Com4, respectively. These fragments are consecutive fragments that have overlapping ends bearing the BamHI and NsiI restriction sites for cloning purposes. These two fragments were used as templates to amplify an 885-bp XbaI/BamHI fragment with the Com1 and Com4 primers, which was cloned as an XmaI/SpeI fragment in pSL1190. Subsequently, an 800-bp XbaI/BamHI fragment containing the chloramphenicol resistance cassette was added to this construct, generating plasmid pSLComCmr. The 1,550-bp BamHI/NsiI lacI-Ptac region was amplified from plasmid pMMB206 with oligonucleotides Pind-F and Pind-R, and a 910-bp NdeI/NsiI fragment of the crgA gene was amplified from N. meningitidis strain MC58 with oligonucleotides CrgA-N and Crg-R. The PCR products were cloned in the BamHI/NdeI sites of the pSLComCmr plasmid. The resulting plasmid, pPindcrgA, was used to transform
RCrgA (MC-CPcrgA5). Transformants were selected for chloramphenicol resistance, and correct insertion was verified by PCR. The selected strain was named
RCrgA-C (MC-CCindPcrgA5). Induction of the protein was achieved by growing the strain in GC broth with isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to the logarithmic phase.
Primer extension analysis.
An oligonucleotide (3 pmol) was 5' end labeled in the presence of [
-32P]ATP (5,000 Ci/mmol; Perkin-Elmer) and T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs). One hundred femtomoles of the labeled oligonucleotide was coprecipitated with 30 µg of total RNA and resuspended in 5 µl of water, 2 µl of 2 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, and 2 µl of 5x reverse transcription buffer (Roche). The mixture was incubated for 2 min at 95°C and for 1 min at room temperature, and then reverse transcription was started by adding 1 µl of reverse transcriptase (Roche) and incubating the reaction mixture at 45°C for 45 min. The sample was then incubated for 10 min at room temperature with 1 µg of RNase A for RNA digestion, extracted once with an equal volume of phenol-chloroform (1:1), ethanol precipitated, and resuspended in 5 µl of sequencing loading buffer. After denaturation at 95°C for 2 min, samples were subjected to 6% urea-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiographed.
S1 nuclease mapping.
A 441-bp probe corresponding to the promoter region of crgA and the 5' region of the crgA gene (Probe1) (Fig. 1A), labeled at the 5' end of the noncoding strand, was obtained by PCR amplification with the primer pair NMB1856L-NMB1856R, 5' end labeled in the presence of [
-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs), and subsequently digested with SspI. Approximately 20 fmol of the probe was coprecipitated with 40 µg of total N. meningitidis RNA and resuspended in 20 µl of hybridization buffer (80% formamide, 60 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 400 mM NaCl, 0.4 mM EDTA). The mixture was overlaid with 5 µl of mineral oil, denatured at 100°C for 2 min, and incubated overnight at 55°C. Subsequently, 180 µl of ice-cold S1 buffer (33 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.2, 5 mM ZnSO4, 250 mM NaCl) and 1 µl of S1 nuclease (150 U/µl; Invitrogen) were added, and digestion was carried out for 30 min at 37°C. Samples were extracted with phenol-chloroform (1:1), ethanol precipitated, and resuspended in 5 µl of sequencing buffer. After denaturation at 95°C for 2 min, samples were subjected to 6% urea-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiographed.
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. (A) Structural organization of N. meningitidis crgA and mdaB genes (not to scale). Genes are indicated by their designations. The open box represents the 138-bp Rep2/CREN repetitive DNA element. crgA codes for a 299-amino-acid protein belonging to the LysR family (NMB1856), and mdaB codes for an NADPH-quinone oxidoreductase (192 amino acids). The arrows indicate the direction of transcription. Probe1 represents the DNA segment used as a probe in S1 nuclease protection experiments; the asterisk indicates the radioactively labeled end. (B) Nucleotide sequence of the mdaB-crgA intergenic sequence. The shaded arrows indicate directions of translation. The bent arrows indicate transcriptional start sites. Underlined boldface letters indicate 10 and 35 promoter consensus sequences. The Rep2/CREN DNA sequence is enclosed in a box. The dotted lines indicate the CrgA binding site according to Deghmane et al. (3). SD, Shine-Dalgarno sequence.
|
|
|
|---|
Figure 2A shows the results of urea-acrylamide gel electrophoresis in an S1 nuclease protection experiment carried out by hybridizing Probe1 (Fig. 1A) to RNA of wild-type N. meningitidis. The results show a major S1-resistant band migrating at a position corresponding to 375 nucleotides, which defined the PcrgA start site of transcription (Fig. 2A, lane 2). Other faster-migrating bands may have been derived from the presence of weaker start points or from in vivo degradation of the RNA, and most of these 5' ends of RNA mapped within the CREN/Rep2 region. Primer extension analysis (Fig. 2D, lane 5) confirmed the position of the PcrgA start site of transcription at a position 179 nucleotides from the ATG start codon of the crgA gene and minor 5' ends of RNA mapping within the CREN/Rep2 element.
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Mapping of the promoters in the crgA-mdaB intergenic region. (A) Identification of the crgA transcripts. The 441-bp DNA of Probe1 (Fig. 1A) was end labeled at one extremity, hybridized to N. meningitidis total RNA, and used for S1 nuclease digestion to map 5' ends of transcription products synthesized by the PcrgA promoter. The G+A lane contained a G+A sequence reaction mixture for the DNA probe used as a size marker (18). A control sample was processed identically but contained no RNA (lane 1). Lane 2 contained 40 µg RNA. The nucleotide sequence of the coding strand upstream of the transcriptional start site is shown on the right, and the 10 promoter element is indicated by a vertical bar. The PcrgA promoter in strain MC58 appears to be localized 10 bp upstream of the P1 promoter mapped by Deghmane and coworkers (7) in strain C8013. The nature of this discrepancy was not investigated. (B) Identification of mdaB transcript. Total RNA (30 µg) from N. meningitidis was hybridized to the end-labeled mdaB-PE oligonucleotide (Table 2) and elongated with reverse transcriptase to map 5' ends of transcription products synthesized by the PmdaB promoter (lane 1). Precise mapping was performed by sequencing the cloned region in plasmid pG3cr:Km (Table 1) with the same primer (lanes G, A, T, and C). DNA regions corresponding to promoter and Rep2/CREN elements are indicated on the left. (C) Schematic representation (not to scale) of the chromosomal promoter-Rep2 mutations fused to the lacZ gene and inserted between the NMB1074 and NMB1075 ORFs of the N. meningitidis genome. The strains are referred to by their short names; the full names are given in Table 1. (D) Detection of the transcript generated by the promoter-Rep2 mutations fused to lacZ. Lanes 1 to 5 contained 30 µg of total RNA extracted from strains wtA, 35, 10, P, and R, respectively, hybridized to the end-labeled LAC oligonucleotide (Table 2), and elongated with reverse transcriptase. Lanes 1 and 5 contained RNA synthesized by the PcrgA promoter; no bands were de-tected in lanes 2 to 4. Similar band patterns have been obtained with RNA extracted from E. coli transformed with plasmids carrying the promoter mutations shown in panel C. Precise mapping was performed by sequencing the cloned region in plasmid pSL-Pcrg5 (Table 1) with primer LAC (lanes G, A, T, and C).
|
These results indicate that the intergenic region between the crgA and mdaB genes contains at least two promoters, which we called PcrgA and PmdaB. Analysis of the DNA sequence revealed the presence of 10-TATAAT and 35-ATGAAT regions upstream of PcrgA and 10-CACAAT and 35-TTTTAA regions upstream of PmdaB. These sequences show conservation with the E. coli sigma 70 10-TATAAT and 35-TTGACA recognized promoters and are likely to define the N. meningitidis PcrgA and PmdaB promoters (Fig. 1B). Analysis of the sequences upstream of the 5' ends mapping within the CREN/Rep2 element revealed no sequence conservation with known promoter consensus sequences.
In order to obtain information on the nature of the 5' ends of transcripts mapping downstream of the PcrgA promoter, we generated progressive deletions of the PcrgA promoter region fused to lacZ, introduced into the N. meningitidis MC58 genome by double recombination, and assayed for activity. As the beta-galactosidase activity values were very close to the background levels for all constructs, we decided to investigate transcription by primer extension analyses. Figure 2C shows a diagrammatic representation of the strains harboring the PcrgA deletion mutations. Total RNA was extracted from each mutant strain and used in primer extension analyses. Figure 2D shows that the PcrgA promoter was active in the strain carrying the full-length promoter construct (strain wtA) (lane 1), as well as in the strain carrying the deletion of the CREN/Rep2 region (strain
R) (lane 5). No extension products were detected with RNA extracted from strains
35,
10, and
P (lanes 2, 3, and 4), which harbored deletions from position 63 to position 15, from position 63 to position 6, and from position 63 to position 43 of PcrgA, respectively. Therefore, transcription of the region studied was abolished when deletions affected the 35 or 10 regions of the PcrgA promoter. Consequently, we concluded that the 5' ends mapping within the CREN/Rep2 region are PcrgA dependent and that no promoters map within this region. These results were confirmed by primer extension of RNA extracted from E. coli transformed with plasmids carrying the crgA promoter mutations (data not shown). Furthermore, five independent beta-galactosidase experiments with the E. coli system gave Miller unit values of 61.5 ± 6.3, 6.8 ± 1.4, 9.8 ± 1.6, 5.4 ± 1.2, and 98.4 ± 3.3 for the wtA,
35,
10,
P, and
R constructs, respectively.
We concluded that the crgA gene is transcribed from the PcrgA promoter upstream of the Rep2/CREN element.
CrgA represses transcription from PcrgA and activates transcription from PmdaB.
To establish the role of CrgA in transcription of the PcrgA and PmdaB promoters, we decided to assay transcription from these promoters in a crgA deletion mutant. To do this, we substituted the crgA gene with a kanamycin cassette in strain
R (Fig. 2C), which carried the PcrgA promoter fused to lacZ in a heterologous locus, generating strain
RCrgA (Table 1). Expression of CrgA in these strains was assessed by Western blot analysis of total protein extracts, whereas transcription from the PcrgA and the PmdaB promoters was assayed by primer extension analysis.
Figure 3A shows a Western blot of protein extracts from strains
R (CrgA+) and
RcrgA (CrgA). As expected, in the wild-type background a protein band corresponding to CrgA was detected (lane 1), while this band was not detected in the crgA deletion mutant (lane 2).
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. (A) Western blot analysis with anti-CrgA antisera. Total cell lysates from strains R (lane 1) and RcrgA (lane 2) were used to detect CrgA. The asterisk marks a cross-reactive band. (B) Regulation of transcription of the PcrgA and PmdaB promoters. Total RNA from strains R (lanes 1) and RcrgA (lanes 2) was hybridized to primers MDER-PE1 (upper panel) and LAC (middle panel) and elongated with reverse transcriptase. As a control (lower panel), RNA from strains R and RcrgA was elongated with primer adk-PE for adk mRNA.
|
Complementation of the crgA mutation.
To complement the crgA mutation and to obtain a better understanding of the regulation of transcription by CrgA, we constructed a strain expressing the crgA gene under the control of an inducible promoter to monitor accumulation of the CrgA protein and correlate it to regulation of transcription. In this strain,
RCrgA-C (Table 1), the expression of the crgA gene was inducible by addition of IPTG, as its transcription was under the control of the Ptac promoter and the LacI repressor. Cells were grown in liquid cultures in the presence of increasing amounts of IPTG to the mid-log phase, and aliquots of each sample were collected and used to prepare total protein extracts and total RNA.
The Western blot in Fig. 4A shows that the CrgA protein was detected when cells were grown in the presence of 10 µM IPTG (lane 2) and that the amount increased with increasing amounts of IPTG in the culture medium (lanes 3 to 4). Primer extension analysis showed that transcription from the PcrgA promoter was repressed in cells grown in the presence of 30 µM IPTG or in the presence of higher concentrations of IPTG (Fig. 4B, compare lanes 3 and 4 with lanes 1 and 2). By contrast, at the same concentrations of IPTG the PmdaB promoter was increasingly activated (Fig. 4C, lanes 1 to 4). In a control experiment, transcription from the adk promoter showed no variation in the amount of RNA in response to IPTG (data not shown). We concluded that CrgA controls transcription from the PcrgA and PmdaB promoters in a dose-dependent manner.
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. (A) Western blot analysis of CrgA expression in the complementing strain ( RCrgA-C) grown with increasing amounts of IPTG. Lanes 1 to 4 contained total lysates from strains grown in the presence of 0, 10, 30, and 100 µM IPTG, respectively. Total RNA was extracted from samples of the same cultures and used in primer extensions to monitor accumulation of RNA synthesized from the PcrgA (B) and PmdaB (C) promoters.
|
-methylene-
-butyrolactone.
In E. coli, the mdaB gene encodes a protein with NADPH-specific quinone oxidoreductase activity that has been shown to be induced more than 25-fold by MBL (13). To investigate whether addition of this small molecule to N. meningitidis cells influences transcription of the mdaB gene in a CrgA-dependent manner and in turn transcription of the crgA gene, we extracted RNA from the wild-type background (
R), the crgA mutant (
RCrgA), and the complementing (
RCrgA-C) strains before treatment and after 10 min of treatment of the cells with 2 mM MBL. These RNA preparations were used in primer extension experiments to monitor accumulation of RNA at the PmdaB and PcrgA promoters, and the results are shown in Fig. 5.
![]() View larger version (55K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Transcriptional response of the PmdaB (A) and PcrgA (B) promoters to MBL treatment. RNA was extracted from the strains indicated at the top, which were treated (+) or not treated () with MBL. Samples CrgA+, CrgA, and CrgAC were samples from strains R, RCrgA, and RCrgA-C, respectively. Strain RCrgA-C was grown in the presence of 1 mM IPTG.
|
R strain (CrgA+) with MBL clearly resulted in an increase in the amount of transcript from the PmdaB promoter (Fig. 5A, lanes 1 and 2). Independent of MBL addition, no extended products were detected in the CrgA mutant (lanes 3 and 4); however, the pattern of RNA accumulation in response to MBL was restored in the CrgA complemented strain (CrgAC) (lanes 5 and 6). The same RNA preparations were then used in primer extension experiments to monitor transcription from the PcrgA promoter. Figure 5B shows that in the wild-type background, the amount of transcript from the PcrgA promoter was decreased upon MBL treatment (lanes 1 and 2) and was not influenced in the mutant (lanes 3 and 4) and that these changes could be complemented by CrgA (lanes 5 and 6). From these results, we concluded that addition of MBL to growing cells activates transcription of the PmdaB promoter and represses transcription from the PcrgA promoter. Furthermore, these modulations of transcription are CrgA dependent.
CrgA and MBL have no effect on transcription of pilus and capsule genes. The results described above prompted us to investigate whether other CrgA-regulated promoters are similarly regulated. As it has been reported that CrgA regulates transcription of the pilC1, pilE, and sia genes (5), we selected these genes to study the CrgA-mediated MBL response. To do this, we carried out primer extensions of the pilE, sia, and pilC1 mRNA using the same RNA sample that was used for the experiment whose results are shown in Fig. 5, and the results are shown in Fig. 6.
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Mapping and regulation of the pilE, sia, and pilC1 promoters. Primer extension analyses were performed with the same RNA used for the experiment shown in Fig. 5 and with primers pilE-PE1 (A), sia-PE1 (B), and pilC-PE2 (C) to assess regulation of the PpilC1, PpilE, and Psia promoters, respectively. Sequencing reactions carried out with each cloned promoter fragment served as size markers (lanes G, A, T, and C). Independent of the strain and of MBL treatment, major bands show no appreciable variation in the amount of elongated products. Analyses of the DNA sequence upstream of the identified major bands revealed the presence of 10 and 35 regions similar to the E. coli sigma 70 consensus sequences, 10-TATAAT and 35-TTGACA. While no promoter consensus sequences were identified upstream of the other 5' ends of RNA mapping downstream of the PpilE and PpilC1 promoters, a putative promoter sequence, AATAAA-N17-TATAAT, was detected upstream of the 5' end of RNA mapping 48 nucleotides upstream of the sia genes (faster-migrating band in panel B).
|
It is worth noting that the 5' ends mapping downstream of the PpilC1 promoter are located in the CREN/Rep2 region of the pilC1 gene; thus, analogous to results obtained for the PcrgA promoter (Fig. 2), these 5' ends of RNA and those mapping downstream of the PpilE promoter may arise from in vivo processing of longer mRNAs.
|
|
|---|
In this study, we identified a single promoter, PcrgA, which is responsible for transcription of the crgA gene. We carried out deletion and 5' end mapping analyses, which showed that the 5' ends of transcripts mapping within the CREN/Rep2 region depend on transcription from the upstream PcrgA promoter (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the PmdaB promoter of the upstream gene is divergently oriented and overlaps the PcrgA promoter (Fig. 1 and 2). This promoter architecture is compatible with coordinated regulation of transcription of the crgA and mdaB genes. Accordingly, the amounts of transcripts synthesized from the PcrgA and PmdaB promoters are increased and decreased in a crgA knockout background, respectively (Fig. 3). Furthermore, repression of the PcrgA promoter and activation of the PmdaB promoter are restored in a complementing strain (Fig. 4). In addition, the degree of complementation of the PcrgA and PmdaB transcriptional regulation correlates well with the intracellular amount of CrgA (Fig. 4). Thus, the autoregulatory mechanism of gene transcription primarily controls the intracellular concentration of CrgA, a condition used by many regulatory proteins to modify their activities in response to environmental changes. In addition, CrgA activates the divergently oriented upstream gene, another typical feature of LysR-type regulators. Interestingly, two CrgA binding sites have been mapped within this region (4, 5). One CrgA binding site spans positions 16 to 13 of the PcrgA promoter, and this region corresponds to positions 20 to 49 of the PmdaB promoter. Another CrgA binding site spans positions 17 to 46 of the PcrgA promoter that correspond to positions 53 to 82 of the PmdaB promoter (Fig. 1B). Therefore, the two CrgA binding sites are located close to the transcriptional start site of the PcrgA promoter and upstream of the PmdaB promoter, respectively. These DNA binding positions could be compatible with a mechanism of repression and activation of transcription of the PcrgA and PmdaB promoters, respectively.
It has been proposed that a second promoter, termed P2, controls expression of the crgA gene mapping within the Rep2/CREN element (7). We have no evidence of promoters mapping within this region. The possibility that this element is responsible for posttranscriptional regulation of crgA upon cell contact should be considered. Indeed, mRNA processing and degradation by nucleases depend on the secondary structure, including the presence of stem-loops at the 5' ends (11). Accordingly, a transcript carrying a CREN/Rep2 region at its 5' end might fold into a secondary structure that could be targeted by specific nucleases during cell contact, resulting in changes in the stability of mRNA. This hypothesis could account for the observed upregulation of transcripts mapping at the P2 site described by Deghmane and coworkers (7).
It has been reported that the activity of the NADPH-quinone reductase encoded by the mdaB gene of E. coli is induced more than 25-fold by the addition of MBL to growing cells (13). As this could result from increased expression of the enzyme, we decided to investigate the effect of MBL on transcription of the CrgA-regulated gene promoters in N. meningitidis. Indeed, cells treated with MBL showed strong induction of transcription from the PmdaB promoter and, in parallel, strong repression of the PcrgA promoter, and both induction and repression were CrgA dependent (Fig. 5). This suggests that MBL could act as a cofactor or effector molecule that activates the CrgA regulatory protein. Interestingly, transcriptome analyses have highlighted the finding that transcription of the mdaB gene is increased upon interaction of N. meningitidis with epithelial cells (8, 10). Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that MBL or a similar molecule could be available to N. meningitidis during adhesion to activate CrgA, which in turn would control transcription of a specific set of genes.
It has been reported that CrgA functions by binding to the promoters of the pilC1, pilE, and sia genes in the regions spanning positions 94 to 58, 163 to 133, and 39 to 13 with respect to the corresponding transcriptional start sites, respectively (3, 5). Consequently, we investigated the effect of MBL-specific and CrgA-dependent regulation of transcription of these genes (Fig. 6). Surprisingly, independent of the CrgA protein, transcription of these genes was not altered in cells treated with MBL. These results do not exclude the possibility that pilC1, pilE, and sia could be regulated by CrgA in response to cell contact. However, it is interesting that while transcription of mdaB and crgA is regulated by CrgA and in response to MBL in a CrgA-dependent manner, transcription of pilC1, pilE, and sia is not affected by CrgA or by addition of MBL to cultured cells. These results are compatible with two hypotheses: (i) regulation by CrgA occurs only upon cell contact by perception of a signal that activates CrgA in a fashion different from that observed for MBL, and (ii) the CrgA binding observed in vitro at these promoters does not occur in vivo or has no biological significance. In support of the latter hypothesis are the findings of Morelle and coworkers (21), who demonstrated that a crgA mutant was capable of adhering to the same extent as the wild-type strain, thus providing functional evidence that pilus expression is not controlled by crgA during bacterial adhesion to eukaryotic cells. Furthermore, these workers reported that the crgA mutant loses its pili during late adhesion stages at a rate similar to that observed with the wild-type strain, thus demonstrating that downregulation of pili is not via crgA (21).
In conclusion, we established that CrgA acts as a repressor of transcription of its own gene and as an activator of transcription of the mdaB gene and that its action is enhanced by the presence of MBL. As crgA is upregulated during the initial phase of adhesion (5), it would be interesting to understand the role of MBL or a similar inducer in the coordination of CrgA-regulated genes during infection.
This work was supported by Chiron and partially by a grant from MIUR and the University of Bologna to V.S.
Present address: Institute of Microbiology, ETH-Hönggerberg HCI 4, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland. ![]()
Present address: Cytos Biotechnology, Wagistrasse 25, CH-8952 Zurich-Schlieren, Switzerland. ![]()
|
|
|---|
54-dependent promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:4305-4313.
54 promoters upstream of the pilE genes of both Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Neisseria meningitidis are functional when transferred to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gene 198:89-97.[CrossRef][Medline]
54 promoter. Gene 208:95-102.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»