Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, July 2005, p. 4457-4462, Vol. 187, No. 13
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.187.13.4457-4462.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0202
Received 27 January 2005/ Accepted 25 March 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among the adaptations exhibited by marine Synechococcus spp. is the ability of certain strains to swim through their liquid environment without the use of flagella (33). Transmission electron microscopy techniques, such as negative staining and quick-freeze fixation, fracture, and etching as well as high-intensity dark-field microscopy, have been employed in attempts to visualize structures, without success (35). Additionally, shearing experiments and motility-dependent amplitude spectra confirm the lack of flagella or other extracellular appendages used for motility (35). Both jet propulsion and self-electrophoresis have been ruled out as possible mechanisms for motility (24). This leaves the cell surface itself as the only remaining structure with potential for generating a propulsive force. Ehlers et al. have proposed a model by which cells could move at the observed speeds by propagating longitudinal waves across their surfaces (9).
Nonflagellar motility is not limited to marine Synechococcus spp. A diverse array of bacteria (16), including other cyanobacteria (12), exhibit nonflagellar motility, but in virtually every case this movement is not swimming but rather a movement associated with surfaces. Marine Synechococcus spp. are different in that in spite of their cells' clear lack of flagella, they swim through their liquid environment and do not move along surfaces. With the exception of the helical, wall-less bacteria of the genus Spiroplasma, which swim by means of conformational deformations of each cell's helical cytoskeletal filament (11, 36), Synechococcus spp. are the only bacteria known to swim without flagella. For a review of swimming motility in marine Synechococcus spp., see the work of Brahamsha (7).
While the basic tools required for genetic manipulations in Synechococcus spp. have been described previously (5, 6), a functional transposon mutagenesis system would be a powerful additional tool for molecular and genetic studies. The integration of a transposon into the host chromosome creates an insertional mutation, which can be easily cloned and sequenced to determine the site of insertion. We used the delivery vector pRL27 (15), which has a mini-Tn5 derivative engineered to enhance transposition frequency, for transposon mutagenesis in Synechococcus sp. strain WH8102, and our results have shown that this tool is useful in identifying new genetic loci involved in swimming motility. As this was the first use of transposon mutagenesis in a marine Synechococcus sp., preliminary experiments were conducted to characterize the use of this delivery vector and transposon. When combined with an appropriate screen or selection, the method described here will be applicable to the study of various aspects of Synechococcus physiology. We have developed a screen to identify mutants impaired in the ability to swim, and this screen in combination with transposon mutagenesis has identified several regions of the chromosome that contain genes necessary for nonflagellar swimming motility.
|
|
|---|
, BW20767 (15), and Transformax EC100D pir+ (Epicentre, Madison, WI) were grown in Luria-Bertani medium (28). When appropriate, ampicillin (100 µg/ml), kanamycin (50 µg/ml), and chloramphenicol (10 µg/ml) were used for the selection and maintenance of plasmids in E. coli. Cyanobacterial strains were grown either in SN medium (32) made with seawater obtained from the Scripps Pier (Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA) or in SN medium prepared with synthetic ocean water (25). Cyanobacterial cultures were incubated at 25°C with a constant illumination of 25 microeinsteins m2 s1 and were maintained as either 4-ml cultures in 17- by 100-mm polystyrene tubes (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) or as 50-ml cultures in 125-ml glass flasks without shaking. SN pour plates for obtaining isolated colonies were prepared as previously described (5), with the single modification of reducing the agar concentration to 0.2% (wt/vol), which aids in screening for nonmotile colonies. Kanamycin was added to a final concentration of 25 µg/ml for pour plates and 20 µg/ml for liquid cultures, where appropriate, to maintain selection for insertions. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
|
Plasmid rescue. The plasposon pRL27 allows for one-step cloning of a transposon insertion and its flanking DNA (15). Chromosomal DNA was prepared from a 50-ml culture of a Synechococcus transconjugant as described previously (5). This purified DNA was digested with BamHI, which does not cut within the transposon sequence. The resulting fragments were ligated using T4 DNA ligase (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) to generate a transposon junction plasmid consisting of the transposon and the flanking chromosomal DNA. The material from the ligation reaction was then electroporated into E. coli strain Transformax EC100D pir+ (Epicentre, Madison, WI) following the manufacturer's recommendations. Following electroporation, the E. coli isolate was plated on Luria-Bertani plates containing kanamycin. Plasmid DNA was isolated from the transformants using a QIAprep spin miniprep kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). The site of insertion of the transposon was determined by sequencing, utilizing the outward-directed transposon-specific primer tpnRL 17-1 (5'-AACAAGCCAGGGATGTAACG-3') (15). DNA sequencing was performed with Megabace reagents (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ) on a Megabace 500 sequencer.
Directed mutagenesis. Directed inactivations were accomplished by cloning a completely internal fragment of a gene into the suicide vector pMUT100 as previously described (5). Twenty-mer oligonucleotide primers (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc., Coralville, IA) were used to amplify DNA fragments (details given in Table 1) for cloning into pMUT100. These constructions were introduced into Synechococcus sp. strain WH8102 by conjugation with E. coli followed by subsequent selection of exconjugants on solidified media containing kanamycin. Clonal isolates were grown in liquid medium to confirm the mutant phenotype of the original transposon mutant. Complete segregation of mutant chromosomes was confirmed by Southern blotting and by PCR. For the PCR test, chromosomal DNA from the cyanobacterial mutant strain was isolated using a DNeasy tissue kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) with the following modification: prior to proteinase K treatment, cells were incubated in a solution containing 20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), 2 mM Na2EDTA, 1.2% Triton X-100, and 50 mg/ml lysozyme for 30 min at 37°C. This DNA was then used as a template for PCR analysis utilizing primers flanking the fragment used for inactivation. Primer pairs used in these tests were confirmed to amplify a fragment of the expected size from wild-type DNA. Failure to amplify a fragment of the wild-type size from a mutant strain's DNA confirms the absence of the intact gene among the clonal population of mutant cells. This same DNA sample was used as a template in another PCR, utilizing primers directed to another open reading frame (ORF) as a positive control to confirm that the DNA was of sufficient quality for PCR amplification.
Genome information. Complete genomic sequence information for Synechococcus sp. strain WH8102 is available at http://genome.ornl.gov/microbial/syn_wh/ (23).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (88K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Phase-contrast micrographs of wild-type WH8102 (A) and minD mutant (B) cells. Scale bar, 10 µm (both panels).
|
![]() View larger version (59K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Pour plates of Synechococcus sp. strain WH8102 transconjugants for isolation and screening of mutants. Shown are both a motile transconjugant (A) and a nonmotile transconjugant (B).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Transposon insertions yielding nonmotile mutants
|
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Chromosomal regions containing genes involved in swimming motility as identified by transposon mutagenesis. (A) Gene arrangement and location of each transposon insertion (arrowheads) are shown. A 1-kb scale bar is included for each cluster. Percent G+C content (window = 200 bp) is included for the chromosomal region encompassing cluster 3. (B) Location of clusters 1 to 3 on a circular chromosome. The outer ring contains predicted ORFs for both strands, and the inner ring shows associated G+C content (deviation from average).
|
On the basis of their proximity to one another, some genes in which insertions occurred are likely to be arranged in operons, and hence polar effects on downstream genes are possible. The start codon of SYNW0088 is 5 bp from the stop codon of SYNW0087. Likewise, in cluster 2, the stop codon of SYNW0192 overlaps the start codon of SYNW0193, and the stop and start codons of the next two downstream ORFs are 2 and 5 bp apart, respectively. On the other hand, neither swmA (SYNW0085) nor SYNW0953 is transcribed with other genes, while the intergenic distances between SYNW0079, SYNW0957, SYNW0960, and SYNW0088 and their downstream genes (159 bp, 59 bp, 118 bp, and 123 bp, respectively) indicate that they are unlikely to be cotranscribed. Determining which, if not all, of ORFs SYNW0087, SYNW0192, SYNW0193, SYNW0194, and SYNW0195 are needed for motility will require complementation experiments. Unfortunately, these experiments are currently not possible with Synechococcus sp. strain WH8102, as kanamycin is the only selectable marker available. We are working to remedy this.
|
|
|---|
Motile cells grown embedded in solidified media produce large, diffuse colonies among which nonmotile isolates can be identified by their small, dense colony morphology. Using this simple visual screen, we have isolated 17 nonmotile transposon mutants and characterized the site of transposon insertion for each. All motility genes identified to date cluster into three discrete regions on the chromosome. Various transporters and transport-related genes are present within these clusters. Both cluster 2 and cluster 3 contain a set of three genes that appear to encode a multicomponent transport apparatus. Moreover, these three genes are arranged in the same order in both clusters. Each set contains a gene for an ABC transporter of the protein-1 exporter (HlyB) family (SYNW0193 and SYNW0959) (27), a gene for a membrane fusion protein (SYNW0194 and SYNW0958) which is an auxiliary component possibly spanning the periplasm to connect the ABC transporter with an outer membrane component, and a gene whose product has limited similarity to peptidyl-prolyl isomerases (PPIases) (SYNW0192 and SYNW0960). Such PPIases have been shown to exhibit chaperone-like activity involved in the maturation of outer membrane porins in E. coli (2). Additionally, the SYNW0957 product shows very weak similarity to the MotA/TolQ/ExbB proton channel family (PFAM accession no. PF01618), which is also involved in protein translocation across both membranes of the gram-negative bacterial cell wall. In addition to multicomponent transporters, the products of several ORFs in these clusters (SYNW0087, SYNW0088, SYNW0084, and SYNW0195) show similarity to glycosyltransferases. Interestingly, the only previously known component of the motility apparatus, SwmA, is glycosylated (4) and has been shown to form an S-layer on the surface of these cells outside of the outer membrane (20). Both of these characteristics of SwmA correspond well with the types of genes found in the motility clusters. The presence of multiple transporters and multiple glycosyltransferases suggests that other components of the motility apparatus may be located outside the outer membrane and may be posttranslationally modified by glycosylation.
One exceptional gene present in cluster 3 (SYNW0953), hereinafter called swmB, is more than 32 kb long and comprises more than 1% of the total genome of this organism. While the function of SwmB is still unclear, preliminary experiments have shown that this protein is associated with the outer membrane (J. McCarren and B. Brahamsha, unpublished). More than half of the sequence of swmB is composed of regions of large tandem repeats. Database searches against the SwmB sequence indicate limited similarity to bacterial RTX proteins (named for repeats in toxin, which are secreted toxins that possess tandem copies of a nine-amino-acid motif) (34) and that this similarity is restricted to the repetitive portions of SwmB. While SwmB shares similarity with RTX proteins, SwmB does not actually contain the RTX repeat. Cluster 3 is also exceptional in its percent G+C content compared to that of the rest of the genome (Fig. 2). Synechococcus sp. strain WH8102 has a genome average G+C content of 59.4% (23) while the G+C content of cluster 3 is 42.2% and exhibits an abrupt departure from the genome average immediately before swmB and after SYNW0961. The dramatically different percent G+C contents suggest that these ORFs may have been acquired by a recent horizontal gene transfer event. While the ORFs in cluster 3 may be a recent acquisition, clusters 1 and 2 have percent G+C contents typical of Synechococcus sp. strain WH8102, suggesting that all of the components required for motility were not acquired in a single horizontal transfer event.
While swimming motility in marine Synechococcus spp. is distinct from the surface-associated gliding motility observed in other bacteria, it does share characteristics with the gliding motility observed in the Cytophaga-Flavobacteria-Bacteroides group, which occurs without slime extrusion or apparent appendages (17). Following chance attachment, both types of cells are observed to rotate about their point of attachment at a rate of 1 to 2 rotations per s (14, 35). Additionally, several parallels can be drawn between the motility genes of Flavobacterium johnsoniae identified in reports from the laboratory of McBride and coworkers (1, 13, 18, 19) and the types of genes identified in the data presented here. The first is the importance of transporters to both mechanisms of motility. Two sets of putative multicomponent ABC transporters have been identified in our current results. Similarly, several genes homologous to multicomponent ABC transporters (gldA, gldF, and gldG) and other transport-related genes (secDF) are all required for F. johnsoniae motility. A second similarity shared by both mechanisms of motility is that they employ PPIase-like proteins. While the PPIase-like ORF products required for Synechococcus and F. johnsoniae motility are from separate and evolutionarily unrelated families, the implication of functionally related proteins is of interest. Lastly, some genes with limited similarity to swmB have been implicated in Cytophaga-Flavobacteria-Bacteroides-type gliding motility. Recently, both a gene encoding an RTX autotransporter protein (T. Braun, S. Nelson, M. Uppal, and M. McBride, Abstr. Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 2004, abstr. 104, 2004) and an exceptionally large and repetitive ORF (S. Nelson, personal communication) have been found to be involved in F. johnsoniae gliding motility. Also worthy of note in light of the low G+C content of cluster 3 genes, bacteria of the family Flavobacteriaceae have a characteristically low G+C content, ranging from 28 to 44% (3). How surface-associated gliding motility and nonflagellar swimming motility are related is difficult to envision, but the identification of similar types of genes involved in both phenomena suggests some possible relationship.
How the products of these recently identified genes function has yet to be determined. Exporting components of the motility apparatus to the cell surface appears to be important. In addition to allowing for the correct localization of the motility apparatus, perhaps these transporters play a more active role in generating swimming motility. Furthermore, a number of glycosyltransferases appear to be implicated. Whether these function to glycosylate protein components of the motility apparatus or whether they are involved in some other aspect of polysaccharide biosynthesis important for motility is unclear. Although how Synechococcus spp. are able to swim is still not understood, these findings have begun to identify the genes required for swimming motility.
This work was supported by grants NSF MCB97-27759 and DOE DE-FG03-O1ER63148.
|
|
|---|
for cloning, mutagenesis, and allele replacement in bacteria. Plasmid 35:1-13.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»