Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2005, p. 6750-6761, Vol. 187, No. 19
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.187.19.6750-6761.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Unité de Génétique, Institut des Sciences de la Vie, Université Catholique de Louvain, Place Croix du Sud 5, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium,1 Laboratoire de Recherche Moléculaire sur les Antibiotiques INSERM E0004, 5, Rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France,2 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Flore Lactique et Environnement Carné, Domaine de Vilvert, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France,3 Wageningen Centre for Food Sciences; NIZO Food Research, P.O. Box 20, 6710 BA, Ede, The Netherlands4
Received 26 March 2005/ Accepted 8 July 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Most lactobacilli are DL-lactate producers, but the ratio of the two isomers is highly variable. This has mainly been attributed to different activities of the LdhD and LdhL enzymes (21, 45). Some exceptions among lactobacilli are Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, which produces mainly D-lactate, in agreement with the absence of LdhL activity, and Lactobacillus casei, where L-lactate is the major isomer formed (21, 39). In this species, the pathway of D-lactate production has not been investigated.
The presence of a lactate racemase (EC 5.1.2.1) has been proposed in a few Lactobacillus species, namely, Lactobacillus sakei (29), Lactobacillus curvatus (45), and Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei (formerly L. casei subsp. pseudoplantarum [45]). In these species, only L-lactate is initially produced, which induces lactate racemase activity, permitting the formation of D-lactate. This results ultimately in the production of almost equal amounts of D- and L-lactic acid (21, 45). The existence of a lactate racemase in L. sakei 23K has been further confirmed by showing that mutation of the sole ldhL gene prevents the production of both D- and L-lactate (38). The existence of a lactate racemization activity has also been demonstrated in cell extracts of Pediococcus cerevisiae and Pediococcus pentosaceus (24), and of other non-lactic acid bacteria such as Clostridium beijerinckii ATCC 14823 (formerly Clostridium butylicum [13]), Clostridium acetobutylicum (32), Megasphaera elsdenii (27), and several halophilic archaea (41).
Very few biochemical studies on lactate racemase have been reported. This is mainly due to the fact that the enzyme seems to be highly sensitive to oxidation (13, 45). The enzymes from L. sakei and C. beijerinckii have been purified, and basic biochemical properties have been determined (9, 29). A catalytic mechanism has been proposed for the lactate racemase of C. beijerinckii, involving an
-carbonyl intermediate covalently bound to a sulfhydryl group of the enzyme (9). However, no N-terminal sequence was determined for the purified enzymes and no gene sequence encoding lactate racemase has been identified in any species to date.
When fermenting glucose, L. plantarum produces both D- and L-lactate in a ratio close to 1:1 (20, 45) (Fig. 1). The presence of almost equal levels of both Ldh activities could account for the production of a racemic mixture of lactate, and there is no apparent need to postulate the presence of a lactate racemase (11, 21, 45). Accordingly, an ldhL mutant of L. plantarum exclusively produces D-lactate (16). However, the finding that an ldhD mutant still produces a racemic mixture of lactate led Ferain et al. (17) to suggest the presence of an L-lactate inducible lactate racemase in L. plantarum. This observation appears to contradict previously published results describing the lactate racemizing system of L. plantarum as a coupled enzymatic system composed of the two stereospecific Ldhs (28).
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic representation of the connection between D-lactate production and peptidoglycan biosynthesis in the L. plantarum double ldhD lar mutant (PG6212). When both D-lactate production pathways (LdhD and Lar) are disrupted (|), production of the D-alanyl-D-lactate depsipeptide is blocked and peptidoglycan synthesis cannot occur (x). The ldhD lar mutant can be rescued in the presence of D-lactate or other D-2-hydroxy acids. Alternatively, D-alanine can replace D-lactate by heterologous expression of the D-alanyl-D-alanine ligase from L. lactis. Enzymatic reactions potentially involved in the incorporation of D-alanine in the peptidoglycan precursors of the ldhD lar suppressor mutants are depicted by dashed arrows. Regulation of the Lar activity by D- and L-lactate is indicated by curved arrows. The UDP-N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanyl- -D-glutamyl-meso-diaminopimelate moiety of the peptidoglycan precursor is shown as a circle. LdhL, NAD-dependent L-lactate dehydrogenase; LdhD, NAD-dependent D-lactate dehydrogenase; Lar, lactate racemase; LpDdl, L. plantarum Ddl ligase; LcDdl, L. lactis Ddl ligase; MurF, UDP-N-acetylmuramoyl-tripeptide-D-alanyl-D-lactate ligase; PG, peptidoglycan; VanR, resistant to high concentrations of vancomycin; VanS, resistant to low concentrations of vancomycin.
|
In the present study, the lactate racemase activity was characterized in the L. plantarum NCIMB8826 strain and its previously published ldhD (17) and ldhL (16) mutant derivatives. The L-lactate inducibility of this activity was exploited to identify an operon involved in lactate racemization. A mutant defective for both LdhD and lactate racemase activities was constructed and shown to depend on D-lactate for growth. The growth defect of this mutant was characterized, and it was shown that other D-2-hydroxy acids, but not D-2-amino acids, could efficiently replace D-lactate in the peptidoglycan precursors.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains plasmids and primers used in this study
|
Construction of overexpression vectors for genes of the lar operon. The PldhL promoter and ldhL translational signals of L. plantarum NCIMB8826 were amplified by PCR with primers Pldh1 and Pldh22. This 352-bp fragment was then digested with KpnI and XbaI and cloned into similarly digested pLAB1301 (30). The resulting plasmid was called pGIZ906. A fragment spanning the entire lar operon (5.12 kb; see Fig. 4) was amplified by PCR with primers LP104A1 and LP109B2, digested with PstI and XbaI, and cloned under transcriptional and translational control of the ldhL expression signals into NsiI/XbaI-digested pGIZ906. The resulting plasmid was designated pGIZ632. Similarly, overexpression vectors for every single gene of the lar operon were constructed based on plasmid pGIZ906. Fragments spanning the entire open reading frame (ORF) of larA (LP104A1/LP104B1), larB (LP105A1/LP105B2), larC1 (LP106A1/LP106B1), larC2 (LP107A1/LP107B1), glpF1 (LP108A1/LP108B1), and larE (LP109A1/LP109B2) were obtained, digested with PstI and XbaI, and cloned into NsiI/XbaI-digested pGIZ906, generating plasmids pGIZ630, pGIZ660, pGIZ661, pGIZ662, pGIZ663, and pGIZ664, respectively. The same procedure was repeated with a PCR fragment containing the larC1 and larC2 genes as organized in the L. plantarum chromosome (LP106A1/LP107B1), generating plasmid pGIZ665. The larA and larB genes are under the transcriptional and translational control of the ldhL expression signals (plasmids pGIZ630 and pGIZ660, respectively), whereas plasmids pGIZ661, pGIZ662, pGIZ663, pGIZ664, and pGIZ665 contain transcriptional fusions between the PldhL promoter and the larC1, larC2, glpF1, larE, and larC1 genes, respectively.
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Structural organization of the lar operon in L. plantarum and other bacteria. Homologous genes in the different loci are colored the same. The numbers above the genes indicate the percentage of identity between the encoded protein and the corresponding protein of L. plantarum. Except for L. sakei, the LarC1-LarC2 protein homologues were compared to the complete LarC protein from L. plantarum, obtained by artificially adding an A in the frameshift region. Strains: L. plantarum, strain WCFS1 (AL935263); L. sakei, strain 23K (AY849556), P. pentosaceus, strain ATCC 25745 (AAEV000000000); C. acetobutylicum, strain ATCC 824 (AE001437); S. epidermidis, strain ATCC 12228 (AE015929); W. succinogenes, strain DSM1740 (BX571656).
|
ldhL), and clones having integrated the vector in the chromosome were selected on MRS containing erythromycin. Integration at the desired locus was confirmed by PCR with primers Pldh1 and LP105B2. The resulting strain was called PG6351 (PldhL::larA-larE).
Deletion of the lar operon.
The lar deletion vector pGIZ621 was constructed in two steps. Initially, a 1.46-kb fragment located upstream of larA was amplified by PCR with primers LP104KOA1 and LP104KOB1, digested with EcoRI and KpnI, and cloned into similarly digested pUC18Ery. Subsequently, a 1.58-kb fragment located downstream of larE was amplified by PCR with primers LP109KOA1 and LP109KOB3, digested with KpnI and SpeI, and inserted between the KpnI and XbaI sites of the plasmid obtained in the first step. This plasmid, pGIZ621, harbors an in-frame fusion between the 5' end of larA and the 3' end of larE. This suicide vector was used to delete the lar operon through a two-step homologous recombination process, as previously described (16). The
lar genotype was confirmed by PCR with primers LP104KOA2 and LP109KOB2, located upstream and downstream of the recombination regions, respectively. Deletion was carried out in L. plantarum NCIMB8826 (wild type) and TF102 (ldhD::cat), generating strains PG6210 and PG6212, respectively.
Integration of a PnisA::Lcddl fusion in PG6212.
The Lcddl ORF from Lactococcus lactis NZ3900 (14) was amplified by PCR with primers LLCpBAD3 and LLDDLXP2. The resulting amplicon (1.06 kb) was digested with NcoI and PstI and cloned in translational fusion with the nisA expression signals of similarly digested pNZ8048 (35). The PnisA::Lcddl fusion was transferred as a 1.38-kb StuI/KpnI fragment into SfoI/KpnI-digested plasmid pMEC10 (43), generating plasmid pGIM117. This integration plasmid was introduced into L. plantarum PG6212 (ldhD::cat
lar), and clones having integrated the plasmid in the chromosome were selected on MRS containing erythromycin. Integration at the tRNASer locus was confirmed by PCR. The resulting strain was designated PG1174. Similarly, plasmid pMEC10 was introduced in the L. plantarum PG6212 mutant, giving the control strain PG1104.
RNA extraction and hybridization techniques. L-Lactate (0.2 M) was added to a L. plantarum TF101 culture at an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.75. At different times after L-lactate addition, 50-ml aliquots were centrifuged at 5,000 x g for 10 min, and total RNA was extracted by the method of Anba et al. (1). Northern blot experiments were carried out as described by Lorquet et al. (36), using a 710-bp probe that hybridizes with the larA ORF. This probe was obtained by PCR amplification with primers 104A1 and 104B1.
DNA microarray analysis. The DNA microarrays applied in the present study have previously been described and are clone-based arrays that cover more than 85% of the L. plantarum WCFS1 genome (40). Differential transcript levels were determined by two-color (Cy5 and Cy3) fluorescent hybridizations of the corresponding cDNAs. The RNA samples from noninduced and L-lactate-induced (90 min) cultures of L. plantarum TF101 were labeled during reverse transcription using random hexamers primers and either Cy5- or Cy3-labeled dUTP (Amersham Biosciences, Roosendaal, The Netherlands). Unincorporated dyes were removed from the synthesized cDNA by using Autoseq G50 columns (Amersham Biosciences). The arrays were prehybridized for 45 min at 42°C in prehybridization solution (1% bovine serum albumin, 5x SSC [1x SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.017 M sodium citrate, pH 7.2], and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]). Cy5- and Cy3-labeled samples were mixed before hybridizations. Hybridizations were performed overnight at 42°C in Easyhyb buffer (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The slides were subsequently washed twice in 1x SSC and 0.2% SDS, once in 0.5x SSC, and twice in 0.2x SSC at 37°C. Slides were dried and scanned with a ScanArray Express 4000 scanner for both dyes (Perkin-Elmer, Boston, Ma.). Images were analyzed by using ImaGene 4.2 software and applying standard setting for spot flagging (BioDiscovery, El Segundo, Calif.). ImaGene output files were processed by removal of flagged spots, and remaining, high-quality spots were normalized and further interpreted (40). Since on these arrays many genes are represented by more than a single clone, primary selection of regulated genes was based on consistency of direction and magnitude of regulation of expression of clones corresponding to the gene. Subsequently, manual analysis of the regulatory factors obtained for flanking clones was used to determine the predicted boundaries of the regulated chromosomal locus.
Lactate racemization assays. Assays were performed on crude cell extracts obtained by mechanically breaking the cells from a 50-ml culture with a bead beater, as previously described (36). Lactate racemization activity was assayed as described by Dennis (12), except that Tris-maleate buffer (50 mM [pH 6.0]) was used. The D- or L-lactate initial concentration was 20 mM. Then, 0.1% (wt/vol) yeast extract (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom), 2 mM MgSO4, 2 mM MnSO4, and 2 mM ascorbic acid were added since these compounds have been shown to enhance the in vitro lactate racemase activity of Clostridium acetobutylicum (32) and Clostridium beijerinckii (13). Samples were taken at time zero and after 1 h of incubation at 28°C, and boiled for 10 min to inactivate the enzyme. Concentrations of D- and L-lactate were measured enzymatically (kit no. 1112821; Boehringer Gmbh, Mannheim, Germany). The amounts of total protein in the cell extracts were measured according to the method of Bradford (7), using the Bio-Rad Laboratories (Munich, Germany) protein assay (catalog no. 500-0006). Lactate racemization specific activity is expressed as µmol of D- or L-lactate produced per min per mg of total protein.
Preparation and analysis of the peptidoglycan nucleotide precursor pools. L. plantarum cells were grown in MRS or MPL broth to an OD600 of 0.7 and treated with ramoplanin (10 µg/ml; kindly provided by Lepetit, Milan, Italy) for 120 min, as previously described (2). Peptidoglycan precursors were extracted with 20% trichloroacetic acid and analyzed by reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography with a µBondapack C18 column (7.8 by 300 nm; Waters, St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, France) at a flow rate of 2 ml min1 with 50 mM ammonium formiate (pH 5.0) (37). Products were detected by measuring the absorbance at 262 nm. The UDP-MurNAc structures were purified by reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography, lyophilized, dissolved in H2O, and analyzed by mass spectrometry as previously described (6).
|
|
|---|
ldhL) and NCIMB8826 (wild type) showed no or close-to-background activities. No significant changes in Lar activity were observed at different growth stages. The Lar activity was assayed in the D- to L-lactate and L- to D-lactate directions, and similar results were obtained, as shown for the ldhD mutant in Fig. 2B. The L-lactate/D-lactate ratios in the culture supernatants of theses strains could be correlated with their Lar and Ldh activities. In the wild-type strain, both LdhD and LdhL are present, and both lactate isomers are thus produced (Table 2). In the ldhL mutant (TF101), only LdhD activity is present, leading to the exclusive production of D-lactate (Table 2). Lar activity is not detected in this strain, explaining the absence of L-lactate production. In the ldhD mutant (TF102), L-lactate is formed through the LdhL activity, while D-lactate could be produced by the Lar activity, thus leading to the formation of a racemic mixture of both isomers (Table 2).
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Lactate racemization (Lar) activity in L. plantarum. (A) Lar activity of L. plantarum NCIMB8826 (wild-type, black bars), TF101 ( ldhL, white bars), and TF102 (ldhD::cat, gray bars) at different growth stages, assayed with L-lactate as a substrate. Growth of the wild type in MRS broth at 28°C is shown as the log of the OD600. Growth of the TF101 and TF102 mutants were comparable to that of the wild-type strain. (B) Influence of D- and L-lactate on the Lar activity of L. plantarum TF102. Cells were grown in MRS broth to an OD600 of 0.75. Then, D- and/or L-lactate was added to the culture as indicated (bottom of panel B), and the cells were allowed to grow for 2 h. Cells were collected, and Lar activities were measured with L-lactate ( ) or D-lactate ( ) as a substrate. (C) Lar activity of L. plantarum NCIMB8826, TF101, and TF102, assayed with L-lactate as a substrate. The activities were measured with ( ) or without ( ) induction by L-lactate (0.2 M for 2 h at 28°C). The data shown are from one representative experiment from at least three independent repetitions.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. D- and L-lactate production by L. plantarum NCIMB8826 derivativesa
|
The induction of Lar activity by L-lactate (0.2 M, compared to 15 mM D-lactate already produced by the strain, see below) was also observed in the ldhL mutant, with an induced specific activity similar to that of the ldhD mutant (Fig. 2C). In the wild-type strain, the induced Lar activity was
13-fold lower than in the two ldh mutants (Fig. 2C). This could be explained by the ability of the LdhL enzyme to oxidize L-lactate to pyruvate (23), which can then be reduced to D-lactate through the LdhD activity. This would quickly reduce the L-lactate excess, thus preventing induction of the racemase. In the two ldh mutants, however, this Ldh-dependent racemization pathway could not take place.
Cloning of an operon involved in lactate racemization in L. plantarum. Since previous studies suggested that L-lactate induction of the Lar activity occurs at the genetic level (45), the L-lactate inducibility of the Lar activity was used to identify genes that could potentially be involved in lactic acid racemization. For this reason, initial experiments were focused on a more detailed analysis of the L-lactate-mediated induction of Lar activity. The ldhL mutant (TF101) was used since it provided the highest induction factor in Lar activity (Fig. 2C). Before addition of L-lactate to an exponentially growing culture of the ldhL mutant, the D-lactate concentration was 15 mM. After addition of L-lactate (0.2 M), the L-lactate/D-lactate ratio was thus 13:1, and the Lar activity started to be induced. During the first 2 h, the Lar activity increased gradually and L-lactate was converted to D-lactate by the lactate racemase (Fig. 3A). Consequently, the L-lactate/D-lactate ratio decreased until it reached equilibrium and the Lar activity reached a plateau (120 min after induction; Fig. 3A). When D- and L-lactate concentrations were equivalent, the Lar activity was no longer induced and started to decrease (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (50K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Time course of L-lactate induction of the lactate racemase activity in L. plantarum TF101 ( ldhL). L-lactate (0.2 M) was added to a TF101 culture at an OD600 of 0.75. Samples were taken every 30 min for lactate racemization assay (A, white bars) and Northern blot analysis (B). The OD (A, solid line, squares) and percentage of D-lactate (A, dashed line, triangles) were monitored during induction. The Lar activity was assayed with L-lactate as a substrate. The data presented are from one of three independent experiments that gave essentially the same results. ND, Lar activity not determined. The Northern blot was carried out with a larA probe. (C) RNA electrophoresis of the Northern blot in panel B. Equivalent amounts of total RNA (8 µg) were loaded in each lane.
|
In order to establish a possible involvement of this operon in the lactate racemization activity of L. plantarum, a stable operon mutant was constructed by deletion of a 4.65-kb region spanning the 3' half of the first gene to the 5' half of the last gene. No Lar activity could be detected in this strain (PG6210) with or without induction by L-lactate. This operon was thus designated lar (for lactate racemization), and the six genes were named larA, larB, larC1, larC2, glpF1, and larE, respectively (Fig. 4).
In silico analysis of the lar operon. Sequence analysis of the first protein, encoded by larA, shows similarity to uncharacterized conserved proteins (COG3875). The larB gene product is similar to NCAIR mutase (PurE)-related proteins (COG1691). The third and fourth gene products (larC1 and larC2) were found to be similar to the N- and C-terminal parts of uncharacterized conserved proteins (COG1641), respectively. The complete larC ORF (larC1-larC2) of the L. plantarum genome sequence appears to have been disrupted by a 1 frameshift mutation. Indeed, no putative ribosomal binding site is present in front of the larC2 ATG codon, and the larC1 stop codon is preceded by a stretch of 10 A's, which was confirmed by resequencing of the larC1-larC2 region (data not shown). The protein encoded by the glpF1 gene is annotated as a glycerol uptake facilitator protein, which belongs to the major intrinsic protein family. Finally, the larE gene product belongs to a group of putative ATP-utilizing enzymes of the PP-loop superfamily (COG1606).
Although its structure is not entirely conserved, the lar operon is found in all sequenced organisms where lactate racemization has been observed, i.e., L. sakei, P. pentosaceus, and C. acetobutylicum (Fig. 4). The organization of the operon is very well conserved between L. plantarum, L. sakei, and P. pentosaceus. The lar locus of C. acetobutylicum is split in two parts that are interrupted by another putative operon composed of three genes and showing homology to an operon located upstream of the lar operon in L. plantarum (Fig. 4). The lar operon is also found in other sequenced bacteria where no data are available about a possible lactate racemization activity. The best-conserved operons are found in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Wolinella succinogenes. Although the gene order appears to be variable, these operons contain homologues of larA, larB, larC1-larC2 (both as a single ORF), and larE (Fig. 4).
Involvement of the lar operon in lactate racemization activity.
To further establish the role of the lar operon in the Lar activity, the full operon was overexpressed under control of the strong constitutive expression signals of the ldhL gene from L. plantarum using plasmid pGIZ906. The overexpression vector was transformed into L. plantarum PG6210 [
(larA-larE)] and L. casei ATCC 393. The latter was selected for heterologous expression since it has no Lar activity and it is phylogenetically close to L. plantarum. This strain produces mainly L-lactate, together with 5 to 10% of D-lactate (39; data not shown).
Overexpression of the complete lar operon (plasmid pGIZ632) failed to confer Lar activity to L. casei, as assayed by either Lar activity measurement in cell extracts or D-lactate production by growing cells (data not shown). L. plantarum could not be transformed with this plasmid, suggesting that overexpression of the lar operon was toxic in this background. Further analysis of the lar operon by overexpression of every single lar gene under the control of the ldhL expression signals (plasmids pGIZ630, pGIZ660, pGIZ661, pGIZ662, pGIZ663, pGIZ664, and pGIZ665) revealed that toxicity in L. plantarum was due to overexpression of either larB or larC1 (data not shown). Importantly, none of the other overexpression plasmids restored Lar activity in the PG6210 [
(larA-larE)] mutant (data not shown).
Since multicopy constitutive overexpression of the entire lar operon was toxic in L. plantarum, a monocopy constitutive overexpressing strain (PG6351) was constructed by inserting the ldhL expression signals in front of the operon in the chromosome of the TF101 (ldhL) mutant. The PG6351 strain was found to produce a racemic mixture of D- and L-lactate (Table 2), a finding which is in agreement with a level of Lar activity equivalent to that observed in the ldhD mutant when cultivated in the absence of added L-lactate (data not shown). These results clearly show that the lar operon is involved in the Lar activity of L. plantarum and that regulation of the Lar activity by L-lactate is a direct consequence of the transcriptional regulation of the lar operon expression. However, there is no evidence that the lar-encoded proteins are directly involved in this process or that the whole lar operon is required for Lar activity.
D-Lactate requirement of the ldhD lar double mutant.
The
(larA-larE) mutant (PG6210) did not show any difference with the wild-type strain when lactate production (Table 2), growth, or viability (data not shown) were compared. This was expected since the lar operon is not expressed in the wild-type background (see Fig. 2A).
In order to evaluate the importance of D-lactate for the physiology of L. plantarum, the lar operon was deleted in the ldhD background (TF102). The ldhD lar double mutant (PG6212) grew very poorly in MRS broth containing no added D-lactate (Fig. 5A). Therefore, production of lactate was measured in a culture of PG6212 grown in MRS broth with 20 mM D-lactate. As expected, L-lactate was the only isomer produced, whereas the D-lactate concentration (20 mM, added at the start of the culture) did not change significantly during growth (Table 2). This phenotype confirmed that D-lactate production in the single ldhD mutant (TF102) was due to lactate racemization. In analogy, no Lar activity could be detected in the double ldhD lar mutant, with or without induction by L-lactate.
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Growth of the L. plantarum ldhD lar mutant (PG6212) in MRS (A) or MPL (B) broth after D-lactate starvation. The mutant was grown to an OD600 of 0.5 in the presence of 20 mM D-lactate, washed twice in MRS (A) or MPL (B) broth, and resuspended in fresh MRS (A) or MPL (B) medium with D-lactate concentrations of 0 ( ), 0.01 ( ), 0.05 ( ), 0.1 ( ), 0.5 (), or 20 ( ) mM. The DL-lactate-producing wild-type NCIMB8826 strain was introduced as a control ( [dashed line]). The data presented are from one representative experiment from three independent repetitions.
|
Supplementation with D-2-amino acids or D-2-hydroxy acids. D-Lactate is a major component of the peptidoglycan precursors in L. plantarum, where it is incorporated as the last residue of the pentadepsipeptide (17). Therefore, we suspected that the growth defect of the ldhD lar mutant in the absence of added D-lactate could be connected to a defect in cell wall biosynthesis. D-Lactate enters the peptidoglycan biosynthesis pathway at the level of the reaction catalyzed by the Ddl ligase. In the wild-type L. plantarum strain, this enzyme (LpDdl) synthesizes the D-alanyL-D-lactate depsipeptide, which is then added to the peptidoglycan precursor by the MurF synthetase (46) (see Fig. 1).
To evaluate the intrinsic flexibility of the cell wall biosynthesis machinery, supplementation of growth of the ldhD lar mutant by the addition of precursor substrates other than D-lactate was determined. None of the D-2-amino acids tested could supplement growth of the ldhD lar mutant (Ala, Ser, Asn, Gln, Thr, Met, and D-2-aminobutyrate, as well as the achiral amino acid glycine; Table 3). D-Alanine has been shown to supplement an alanine racemase-deficient mutant of L. plantarum (42), indicating that L. plantarum is able to take up this D-2-amino acid from the medium. Therefore, the lack of supplementation of the ldhD lar mutant with D-alanine can be interpreted as a consequence of the inability of the peptidoglycan synthesis machinery to replace D-lactate by D-alanine. As for the other D-2-amino acids, no data are available about the presence of uptake systems in L. plantarum.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Supplementation of the ldhD lar mutant with D-2-hydroxy acids and D-2-amino acids
|
The presence of D-lactate in the peptidoglycan precursors of L. plantarum NCIMB8826 is responsible for the high level of vancomycin resistance of this strain (MIC > 256 µg/ml, Table 4) (17). As expected, when the ldhD lar mutant was plated on MRS containing 20 mM D-lactate, it was resistant to high concentrations of vancomycin (MIC > 256 µg/ml, Tables 3 and 4). Previous studies on Enterococcus faecalis have shown that the replacement of the C-terminal residue of the peptidoglycan precursors by various D-2-hydroxyacids modulates the level of resistance to vancomycin (3, 26). The vancomycin resistance of the ldhD lar mutant supplemented with these D-2-hydroxy acids was thus estimated (Table 3). Except for D-2-hydroxybutyrate and D-lactate, which showed MICs greater than 256 µg/ml, the vancomycin resistance of the mutant supplemented with the other D-2-hydroxy acids was significantly lowered, suggesting that these compounds are readily incorporated in the peptidoglycan precursors. Accordingly, peptidoglycan precursor analysis of the ldhD lar mutant supplemented with D-lactate and D-2-hydroxybutyrate demonstrated incorporation of these D-2-hydroxyacids at the last position of the pentadepsipeptide (Table 4). As a control, these compounds were added to the growth medium of the L. plantarum wild-type strain, but no differences were observed concerning the level of vancomycin resistance (MIC > 256 µg/ml) whatever the D-2-hydroxyacid used. However, D-2-hydroxycaproate, D-2-hydroxyisocaproate, and D-mandelate had a slightly negative effect on growth.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Cytoplasmic cell wall precursors of L. plantarum NCIMB8826 and derivatives
|
Suppression of the ldhD lar growth defect by expression of the D-alanyL-D-alanine forming Ddl enzyme from Lactococcus lactis. It has been shown that overexpression of the D-alanyl-D-alanine forming Ddl ligase from L. lactis in L. plantarum confers sensitivity to vancomycin through the incorporation of D-alanine instead of D-lactate at the last position of the peptidoglycan precursor (M. Deghorain, unpublished data).
We evaluated the ability of the L. lactis Ddl (LcDdl) to suppress the growth defect of the double ldhD lar mutant. A translational fusion was created between the nisA expression signals and the Lcddl gene and integrated as a single copy in the PG6212 chromosome. In this strain (PG1174), expression of the Lcddl gene is positively controlled by the presence of the inducer nisin (8). Suppression of the ldhD lar mutant growth defect by expression of LcDdl was estimated in D-lactate-starved MPL cultures, as described above. In the absence of nisin, growth stopped rapidly after D-lactate starvation (Fig. 6), similar to the blockage of growth of the ldhD lar mutant in the absence of D-lactate (see Fig. 5B). In contrast, when nisin was added at a subinhibitory concentration (50 ng/ml) (43) to the D-lactate-starved culture, a partial regain of growth of strain PG1174 was observed. Restoration of growth is directly correlated to heterologous L. lactis Lcddl expression since no growth could be observed in a control strain (PG1104) where pMEC10 (43) was integrated in the PG6212 chromosome in the presence or absence of nisin (data not shown). Growth restoration, however, was only partial, compared to supplementation with D-lactate (20 mM; Fig. 6), suggesting either that D-alanine could not efficiently replace D-lactate in the cell wall precursors of L. plantarum or that D-lactate was also required for other cellular processes.
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Suppression of the growth defect of the L. plantarum ldhD lar mutant (PG6212) with the D-alanyl-D-alanine forming LcDdl ligase from L. lactis. The nisin-controlled expression cassette (PnisA::Lcddl) was stably integrated into the PG6212 chromosome (strain PG1174). The PG1174 strain was grown in MPL broth containing nisin (50 ng/ml) and D-lactate (20 mM) to an OD600 of 0.5. Cells were then washed twice in MPL broth and resuspended in MPL containing (triangles) or not (diamonds) nisin (50 ng/ml). The parent PG6212 strain supplemented with D-lactate (20 mM) was introduced as a control (squares). The data shown are from one of three independent experiments that gave essentially the same results.
|
|
|
|---|
The involvement of this operon in lactate racemization in L. plantarum was clearly established by constitutive overexpression of the full lar operon in an ldhL strain (TF101 [16]), which led to complete restoration of L-lactate production by this strain. It was further confirmed in the ldhD mutant (TF102 [17]), where deletion of the lar operon completely abolished D-lactate production (PG6212). However, overexpression of the entire lar operon, as well as every single lar gene, did not lead to lactate racemase activity in L. casei. This was not due to a lack of expression from the PldhL promoter since overexpressed proteins could be observed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (data not shown). Therefore, it appears that expression of the lar operon, although required for lactate racemization, is not the only determinant of this activity. It cannot be excluded that the lactate racemization process also involves gene(s) located outside the lar operon, even if they are not regulated by L-lactate. The lar operon could play an indirect role in lactate racemization, such as synthesis of a cofactor required for the lactate racemase enzyme, although the purified lactate racemases of C. beijerinckii and L. sakei do not seem to require any cofactor (13, 29). Alternatively, it is possible that the lactate racemase consists of more than one polypeptide, some of them being encoded by genes located outside of the lar operon. Whether the lactate racemase is a heteromultimer or merely a pathway leading from one lactate stereoisomer to the other would then remain to be answered. Purification of the lactate racemase, as well as determination of the enzymatic function of the lar-encoded proteins, should help to clarify these issues.
Since the Lar activity is induced by L-lactate and repressed by D-lactate, its physiological function appears to be the production of D-lactate from L-lactate. The importance of D-lactate for the biosynthesis of the L. plantarum cell wall has previously been established (17): D-lactate is incorporated at the last position of the peptidoglycan precursor instead of the usual D-alanine. This feature has also been observed in P. pentosaceus, L. casei, and Leuconostoc mesenteroides (5, 25), where it confers resistance to high levels of vancomycin (5, 17).
In the present study, we observed an absolute D-lactate requirement for the growth of L. plantarum, which was shown to be connected to cell wall biosynthesis. Various other D-2-hydroxy acids could efficiently supplement the growth defect of the L-lactate producing ldhD lar mutant (see Fig. 1). Supplementation with these D-2-hydroxy acids was found to modify the level of vancomycin resistance of this strain, probably as a consequence of their incorporation in the cell wall precursors. Indeed, the ldhD lar mutant cultivated in the presence of D-2-hydroxybutyrate was shown to contain peptidoglycan precursors ending in this hydroxy acid. In constrast, neither D-alanine nor any other D-2-amino acid could supplement the growth defect of the ldhD lar mutant. It seems that the LpDdl ligase cannot efficiently synthesize the D-alanyl-D-alanine dipeptide in L. plantarum (Fig. 1). This is confirmed by the observation that expression of the LcDdl ligase from L. lactis, a lactic acid bacterium known to produce exclusively peptidoglycan precursors ending in D-alanine, suppresses the growth defect of the ldhD lar mutant, leading to vancomycin sensitivity (Fig. 1). Thus, the limiting growth factor of the ldhD lar mutant seems to be the inability to synthesize both depsipeptides (due to the lack of D-lactate or other D-2-hydroxy acids) and dipeptides (due to an apparent specificity of the LpDdl ligase toward D-2-hydroxy acids).
Although D-lactate is required for growth of the ldhD lar mutant strain, suppressor mutants able to grow in the absence of this compound were observed at a low frequency (106) on MRS plates without added D-lactate. These mutants were sensitive to very low levels of vancomycin (MIC = 1 to 4 µg/ml) and were shown to incorporate D-alanine instead of D-lactate in the peptidoglycan precursors (data not shown; see Fig. 1), suggesting that a suppressor mutation could have occurred that would allow synthesis of such modified peptidoglycan precursors. Genetic analysis of these suppressor mutations should provide us with a convenient method to identify key enzymes controlling the nature of the carboxy-terminal residue of the penta(depsi)peptide moiety of the peptidoglycan precursors in L. plantarum.
The observation that D-alanine cannot efficiently replace D-lactate at the carboxy terminus of the penta(depsi)peptide in the ldhD lar mutant appears to contradict the presence of D-alanine ending peptidoglycan precursors in the double ldhD ldhL mutant (Table 4) (17). It should be noted that during the construction of the ldhD ldhL (TF103) mutant, only one clone was obtained that could only be isolated on a D-lactate containing medium but was later shown to grow in the absence of added D-lactate (17). The presence of a suppressor mutation similar to that of the ldhD lar suppressor clones able to grow in the absence of D-lactate can thus not be ruled out in the ldhD ldhL double mutant.
For the first time, D-lactate was shown to be absolutely required for growth of L. plantarum. In this respect, the presence of an alternative pathway for D-lactate production, the lactate racemase, could be of importance in order to ensure that sufficient amounts of D-lactate are available even under conditions where the LdhD enzyme cannot function. Although this compound might also be needed for purely metabolic purposes, it seems that its major role in L. plantarum is connected to peptidoglycan biosynthesis. D-2-Hydroxy acids would be preferred to D-2-amino acids for incorporation at the last position of the peptidoglycan precursors. D-Lactate being the most abundant D-2-hydroxy acid in L. plantarum, it is a substrate of choice for the synthesis of these precursors. It thus appears that the cell wall synthesis machinery of L. plantarum has evolved to produce and incorporate exclusively D-lactate ending precursors. However, efficient supplementation of the ldhD lar mutant by other D-2-hydroxy acids suggests some flexibility of the cell wall biosynthesis enzymes. This mutant thus provides a unique tool for the study of in vivo modifications of the L. plantarum cell wall.
We are grateful to M. Zagorec and S. Chaillou for providing the L. sakei lar locus sequence. We acknowledge F. Schuren for expert technical assistance with the DNA microarray analyses. We warmly thank J. Delcour for fruitful discussions and scientific advice. P.G. holds a doctoral fellowship from FRIA. P.H. is research associate at FNRS.
|
|
|---|
-carbonyl intermediate. Biochemistry 13:287-291.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»