JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blanc-Potard, A.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Bossi, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blanc-Potard, A.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Bossi, L.
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2005, p. 6841-6844, Vol. 187, No. 19
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.187.19.6841-6844.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Mutation at the "Exit Gate" of the Salmonella Gyrase A Subunit Suppresses a Defect in the Gyrase B Subunit

Anne-Béatrice Blanc-Potard,1* Gilles Labesse,2 Nara Figueroa-Bossi,3 and Lionello Bossi3

INSERM U431, Faculté de Médecine, Avenue J. F. Kennedy, 30908 Nîmes cedex 02, France,1 Centre de Biochimie Structurale, INSERM U554-CNRS UMR5048, Université Montpellier I, 15 Av. Charles Flahault, 34060 Montpellier cedex, France,2 Centre de Génétique Moléculaire, CNRS, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France3

Received 7 July 2005/ Accepted 12 July 2005


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Text
 References
 
In Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, an S431P substitution in the B subunit of gyrase (allele gyrB651) confers resistance to nalidixic acid and causes reduced DNA superhelicity and hypersensitivity to novobiocin. Selection for novobiocin resistance allowed isolation of a mutation in the gyrA gene (allele gyrA659), a T467S substitution, which partially suppresses the supercoiling defect of gyrB651. Modeling analysis suggests that this mutation acts by destabilizing the GyrA bottom dimer interface. This is the first example of a gyrA mutation that compensates for a gyrB defect.


   TEXT
Top
 Abstract
 Text
References
 
DNA gyrase is a member of the family of type II DNA topoisomerases, a group of enzymes that catalyze the interconversion of different topological forms of DNA. DNA gyrase introduces supercoils into DNA through the breakage of a DNA duplex, the passage of another DNA segment through the break, and the resealing of the break (8). This activity involves the opening and closing of a series of molecular gates, coupled to ATP hydrolysis. DNA gyrase is a heterotetramer of two A subunits (97 kDa) and two B subunits (90 kDa), encoded by the gyrA and gyrB genes, respectively (8). The 64-kDa N-terminal domain of GyrA is thought to intervene in the breakage-reunion reaction, whereas the 33-kDa C-terminal domain is involved in the stabilization of the gyrase-DNA complex. The GyrB protein contains a 43-kDa N-terminal ATP binding domain and a 47-kDa C-terminal domain that interacts with GyrA and DNA. Structural analysis indicates that the GyrA breakage-reunion domain resembles a clamp with two sets of jaws at opposite ends (18). Experimental studies, using yeast topoisomerase II or DNA gyrase, indicate that DNA is transported by a "two-gate" mechanism, entering the interior of the enzyme through an upper N gate at the GyrA head dimer interface and leaving the enzyme through an "exit gate" at the GyrA bottom dimer interface closer to the C termini (19, 20, 26).

DNA gyrase is the target of two classes of inhibitors, the quinolones, such as nalidixic acid (Nal), which trap DNA gyrase covalently bound to its cleaved substrate, and the coumarins, such as novobiocin (Nov), which inhibit the ATPase activity (15). Mutations conferring Nal resistance are for the most part located in a region of the gyrA gene specifying the N-terminal domain portion between amino acids 51 and 106, the so-called quinolone resistance-determining region (22). Resistance to quinolones (albeit to a lower level) can also result from mutations in the gyrB gene, and the affected sites identified are amino acids D426, K447, and S464 in the GyrB C-terminal domain (12, 27). In addition to their effect on quinolone sensitivity, mutations at sites D426 and K447 also inhibit the gyrase catalytic activity (13). It has been proposed that the quinolone-binding site is a pocket surrounded by surfaces involving the quinolone resistance-determining regions of both the GyrA and GyrB proteins (13, 27).

Isolation of the gyrB651 allele and its phenotypic suppressor, gyrA659. Mutants of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium resistant to low levels of nalidixic acid were isolated by plating 0.2 ml of an overnight liquid culture from strain MA251 (Table 1) on nutrient broth (Difco) agar containing 3 µg/ml Nal. Strain MA251 harbors a his-lac transcriptional fusion whose expression level negatively correlates with gyrase activity (3, 11). This effect can be easily monitored on lac indicator plates containing subinhibitory concentrations of novobiocin, such as MacConkey-lactose plates (Difco) containing 70 µg/ml Nov, on which strain MA251 forms deep red colonies (11). To identify new gyrase alleles affecting DNA supercoiling, mutants selected for growth on 3 µg/ml Nal were examined for their colony color on MacConkey plates containing 70 µg/ml Nov. This led to the identification of a clone (strain ABP280) incapable of growing on such plates. Transductional crosses showed the Nalr mutation to be 50% linked to the zid-748::Tn10 insertion previously mapped near gyrB (formerly zib-748::Tn10 [11]). This suggested the mutation to be a gyrB allele mutation, which was named gyrB651. The gyrB651 allele was moved into a wild-type background, selecting for tetracycline resistance and identifying Nalr colonies among the Tcr transductants. All the Nalr colonies tested displayed hypersensitivity to novobiocin.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Strains used in this study

 
The novobiocin-hypersensitive phenotype of gyrB651 was used to select for suppressor mutations. Novobiocin-resistant mutants were isolated by plating 0.2 ml of an overnight liquid culture from strain ABP280 on MacConkey agar containing 70 µg/ml Nov. One resistant colony, strain ABP290, was chosen for further analysis. Transductional crosses showed a 50% linkage between the Novr mutation and zej-754::Tn10 (formerly zeh-754::Tn10), a Tcr insertion previously mapped near gyrA (21). This result suggested that ABP290 harbored a compensatory gyrA mutation, which was named gyrA659.

Measurement of the MICs of nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin indicated that the gyrB651 mutant increases the levels of both acidic and amphoteric quinolones (Table 2), as reported for the D426N substitution in GyrB (27). Intriguingly, the increase is even higher when the gyrB651 allele is combined with gyrA659. In contrast, the latter does not appear to affect the sensitivity to these drugs significantly (Table 2). Finally, gyrB651 causes a slight increase in Nov sensitivity, and gyrA659 suppresses this effect (Table 2). Exacerbation of these phenotypes in MacConkey medium (data not shown) accounts for our ability to isolate gyrA659 as a lethality suppressor on 70 µg/ml Nov.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. MICs of nalidixic acid, ciproflaxin, and novobiocin for the gyrB651 mutant and the compensatory gyrA659 allele

 
The gyrA659 allele partially corrects the supercoiling defect of gyrB651. To assess the effects of gyrA and gyrB mutations on negative DNA supercoiling, relevant strains were transformed with a reporter plasmid and the supercoiling levels of plasmid DNA extracted from growing cells were compared by analyzing the distributions of DNA topoisomers in agarose gels containing chloroquine as the intercalating agent. Plasmid pKK232-8 (4) was chosen for this study because its low overall transcriptional activity has no detectable influence on DNA supercoiling (10). Results in Fig. 1A show that gyrB651 causes a dramatic reduction in the linking deficit ({Delta}Lk > 10). Mutation gyrA659 corrects this defect to a significant extent, although not completely. On the other hand, gyrA659 by itself does not increase the supercoiling level but rather causes a slight negative supercoiling deficiency that is completely epistatic to that of gyrB651 (Fig. 1B). As an independent verification of these data, we examined the effects of gyr mutations on his operon expression, which is inversely correlated with the degree of negative supercoiling of chromosomal DNA (11). Results in Fig. 2 show that levels of ß-galactosidase activity originating from a his-lac operon fusion increase substantially in the presence of gyrB651 and that, again, gyrA659 suppresses these effects. In this test, the gyrA659 mutant does not differ significantly from wild type. In conclusion, these data show that allele gyrB651 affects the ability of DNA gyrase to negatively supercoil DNA and that gyrA659 partially compensates for this defect without improving by itself the activity of wild-type gyrase.



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Effect of gyrase mutations on plasmid DNA supercoiling. Cells harboring plasmid pKK232-8 were processed as previously described (25). The topoisomer distributions of pKK232-8 DNA isolated from different strains were analyzed in a 1.2% agarose gel containing chloroquine at 10 µg/ml (A) or 15 µg/ml (B). At these chloroquine concentrations, topoisomers with a lower linking number migrate faster in the gels. A. Lane 1, MA251 (wild type); lane 2, ABP348 (gyrB651); lane 3, ABP290 (gyrB651 gyrA659). B. Lane 1, MA251 (wild type); lane 2, ABP350 (gyrA659).

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. Effect of gyrase mutations on expression of a his-lac operon fusion. Beta-galactosidase assays were carried out in different strains in LB medium at 37°C as described by Miller (17). Activities are averages of three independent experiments. Lane 1, MA251 (wild type); lane 2, ABP348 (gyrB651); lane 3, ABP290 (gyrB651 gyrA659); lane 4, ABP350 (gyrA659).

 
Sequence changes resulting from gyrB651 and gyrA659 mutations. The S. enterica serovar Typhimurium gyrA and gyrB genes are 2,637 bp and 2,415 bp long, respectively (16). Overlapping portions of each of the two genes (500 to 700 bp in length) were amplified by colony PCR from strain ABP290 (gyrB651 gyrA659). Amplified fragments were purified and subjected to sequence analysis. A single base-pair change was found in each of the two genes. The gyrB gene showed a T-to-C transition at the first base of codon 431, causing an amino acid change from serine to proline. Thus, gyrB651 represents a novel Nalr allele within the quinolone resistance-determining region of the B subunit. The mutation is also part of the B subunit 47-kDa domain, proposed to contact both the A subunit and the DNA (14).

The gyrA gene had a C-to-G mutation at the second base of codon 467, resulting in an amino acid change from threonine to serine. This mutation is located at the C-terminal end of the DNA breakage-reunion domain of GyrA. The T467 residue is highly conserved among known type II topoisomerases, including yeast and human topoisomerase II enzymes (5). To date, only one spontaneous mutation has been described in this region of DNA gyrase: an R462C substitution which confers resistance to the bacterial toxin CcdB (2).

How gyrB651 and gyrA659 mutations might affect gyrase structure and function. The approximate relative positions of the GyrA T467 and GyrB S431 residues are shown in Fig. 3. The structure of the C-terminal subdomain of GyrB protein, encompassing the S431 residue, has not been solved yet but it can be modeled based on the structure of the B' subdomain of the yeast topoisomerase II (1). The percent identity between both domains is approximately 20%, but it reaches 34% in a region of 120 amino acids that includes the quinolone resistance-determining region (amino acids 420 to 540). A theoretical three-dimensional model of the Salmonella C-terminal subdomain of GyrB was built using the server @TOME (7) and the program MODELLER (23). Evaluation using PROSA (24) and Verify 3D (9) tentatively confirmed the validity of the model (data not shown). The S431 residue is part of an alpha-helix that would be destabilized by the substitution with proline. Such a local conformational change could alter the quinolone-binding pocket (thus increasing resistance to quinolones) and affect the overall structure in a deleterious way for supercoiling activity. The hypothesis of a structural change is in agreement with the fact that the mutation increases resistance to both acidic and amphoteric quinolones.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3. Location of the T467 residue in the GyrA bottom dimer interface. The approximate relative positions of the GyrA T467 and GyrB S431 residues are shown in the left part of the figure. The two GyrB subunits are schematically represented in yellow, and the C-terminal domain is drawn as a circle. The structure of the N-terminal GyrA dimer (59-kDa fragment; PDB 1AB4 [18]) was drawn with the program ViTO (6). The environment of residue T467 at the GyrA bottom dimer interface is shown in detail in the enlarged box. The C{alpha} trace of each GyrA subunit is drawn as a red or blue ribbon. Side chains of relevant residues (see text) are shown in thick wire frames. The Q464 residue is entirely represented in the thin wire frame using the atom-code color. Van der Waals interactions and hydrogen bonds are shown as dotted and plain lines, respectively. All relevant residues mentioned in the paper are conserved and located at the same position in E. coli and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium gyrase subunits. The Salmonella GyrA59 protein exhibits 96.5% identity and 99.9% similarity with the E. coli protein (16).

 
The monomer of the 59-kDa N-terminal subdomain of GyrA from Escherichia coli, encompassing the T467 residue, is formed by an N-proximal head and a C-terminal tail (18). The crystal structure reveals that the GyrA59 dimer exhibits two regions of interface, the head dimer interface and the bottom dimer interface located at the tails. The role of the bottom interface (the "exit gate") in DNA strand passage has been shown using cysteine cross-linking (26). In the model of the corresponding region of the Salmonella enzyme, the residues T467 and L463 appear to be among the most buried residues at the primary dimer interface. The T467 residue is involved in an intricate interaction network (Fig. 3). T467 of one GyrA molecule interacts with I397' of the second GyrA molecule (distance C{gamma}2 to C{gamma}2, 3.6 Å) through van der Waals contacts. In addition, the threonine side chain interacts with the backbone atoms of the residue Q464 by both hydrogen bond (distance O{gamma}1 to O, 2.8 Å) and van der Waals contact (distance C{gamma}2 to C{alpha}, 4.5 Å). Furthermore, the hydrophobic side chain of the L463 from one monomer is sandwiched between the L463' and the I397' from the second monomer. The T467S mutation, resulting in the loss of the carbon C{gamma}2, would create an empty space as well as an unfavorable conformational mobility of the serine side chain. This would in turn destabilize the small helical segment bearing the L463 residue. As a whole, the subtle threonine-to-serine amino acid change could significantly alter the interactions between the two GyrA subunits by destabilizing the primary interface. The increased quinolone resistance of the gyrA gyrB double mutant compared to the gyrB mutant might be due to an effect on the reaction cycle of the enzyme, such as a change in the amount of gyrase-DNA complex that could change the frequency of a quinolone-sensitive state.

Conclusions. The data presented here constitute the first example in which a sequence change in gyrA compensates for a gyrB mutation. Since the mutations affect regions of the two proteins not thought to be in direct contact in the enzyme quaternary structure, it seems likely that the suppression mechanism involves independent compensatory effects. In particular, we propose that by destabilizing the bottom dimer interface, the T467S substitution in gyrA659 might facilitate the passage of the DNA strand through the "exit gate," thus alleviating the possible energy transduction deficit resulting from the gyrB651 allele.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Karima Mezghenna for PCR experiments.

A.-B.B.-P. is supported by the Inserm Avenir program and the CANAM. This work was also supported by the French National Research Council (CNRS).


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Avenir team Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 431, Faculté de Médecine, CS 83021, Avenue J. F. Kennedy, 30908 Nîmes Cedex 02, France. Phone: 33 4 66 02 81 47. Fax: 33 4 66 02 81 48. E-mail: ablancpotard{at}univ-montp1.fr. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 

  1. Berger, J. M., S. J. Gamblin, S. C. Harrison, and J. C. Wang. 1996. Structure and mechanism of DNA topoisomerase II. Nature 379:225-232.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Bernard, P., and M. Couturier. 1992. Cell killing by the F plasmid CcdB protein involves poisoning of DNA-topoisomerase II complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 226:735-745.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Blanc-Potard, A.-B., and L. Bossi. 1994. Phenotypic suppression of DNA gyrase deficiencies by a deletion lowering the gene dosage of a major tRNA in Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 176:2216-2226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Brosius, J. 1984. Plasmid vectors for the selection of promoters. Gene 27:151-160.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Caron, P. R., and J. C. Wang. 1994. Appendix II: alignment of primary sequences of DNA topoisomerases. Adv. Pharmacol. 29B:271-297.
  6. Catherinot, V., and G. Labesse. ViTO, a tool for refinement of protein sequence-structure alignments. Bioinformatics, in press.
  7. Douguet, D., and G. Labesse. 2001. Easier threading through web-based comparisons and cross-validations. Bioinformatics 17:752-753.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Drlica, K., and X. Zhao. 1997. DNA gyrase, topoisomerase IV, and the 4-quinolones. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61:377-392.[Abstract]
  9. Eisenberg, D., R. Luthy, and J. U. Bowie. 1997. VERIFY3D: assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Methods Enzymol. 277:396-404.[Medline]
  10. Figueroa, N., and L. Bossi. 1988. Transcription induces gyration of the DNA template in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:9416-9420.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Figueroa, N., N. Wills, and L. Bossi. 1991. Common sequence determinants of the response of a prokaryotic promoter to DNA bending and supercoiling. EMBO J. 10:941-949.[Medline]
  12. Gensberg, K., Y. F. Jin, and L. J. Piddock. 1995. A novel gyrB mutation in a fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical isolate of Salmonella typhimurium. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 132:57-60.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Heddle, J., and A. Maxwell. 2002. Quinolone-binding pocket of DNA gyrase: role of GyrB. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1805-1815.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kampranis, S. C., A. D. Bates, and A. Maxwell. 1999. A model for the mechanism of strand passage by DNA gyrase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:8414-8419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Maxwell, A. 1997. DNA gyrase as a drug target. Trends Microbiol. 5:102-109.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. McClelland, M., K. E. Sanderson, J. Spieth, S. W. Clifton, P. Latreille, L. Courtney, S. Porwollik, J. Ali, M. Dante, F. Du, S. Hou, D. Layman, S. Leonard, C. Nguyen, K. Scott, A. Holmes, N. Grewal, E. Mulvaney, E. Ryan, H. Sun, L. Florea, W. Miller, T. Stoneking, M. Nhan, R. Waterston, and R. K. Wilson. 2001. Complete genome sequence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2. Nature 413:852-856.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Miller, J. H. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  18. Morais Cabral, J. H., A. P. Jackson, C. V. Smith, N. Shikotra, A. Maxwell, and R. C. Liddington. 1997. Crystal structure of the breakage-reunion domain of DNA gyrase. Nature 388:903-906.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Roca, J., J. M. Berger, S. C. Harrison, and J. C. Wang. 1996. DNA transport by a type II topoisomerase: direct evidence for a two-gate mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:4057-4062.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Roca, J., and J. C. Wang. 1994. DNA transport by a type II DNA topoisomerase: evidence in favor of a two-gate mechanism. Cell 77:609-616.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Rudd, K. E., and R. Menzel. 1987. his operons of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium are regulated by DNA supercoiling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:517-521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Ruiz, J. 2003. Mechanisms of resistance to quinolones: target alterations, decreased accumulation and DNA gyrase protection. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51:1109-1117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Sali, A., and T. L. Blundell. 1993. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234:779-815.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Sippl, M. J. 1993. Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 17:355-362.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Spirito, F., N. Figueroa-Bossi, and L. Bossi. 1994. The relative contributions of transcription and translation to plasmid DNA supercoiling in Salmonella typhimurium. Mol. Microbiol. 11:111-122.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Williams, N. L., and A. Maxwell. 1999. Probing the two-gate mechanism of DNA gyrase using cysteine cross-linking. Biochemistry 38:13502-13511.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Yoshida, H., M. Bogaki, M. Nakamura, L. M. Yamanaka, and S. Nakamura. 1991. Quinolone resistance-determining region in the DNA gyrase gyrB gene of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:1647-1650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Bacteriology, October 2005, p. 6841-6844, Vol. 187, No. 19
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.187.19.6841-6844.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blanc-Potard, A.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Bossi, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blanc-Potard, A.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Bossi, L.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS