Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Supplemental material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Robinson, D. A. Articles by Enright, M. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Robinson, D. A. Articles by Enright, M. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, December 2005, p. 8312-8321, Vol. 187, No. 24
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.187.24.8312-8321.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Evolutionary Genetics of the Accessory Gene Regulator (agr) Locus in Staphylococcus aureus

D. Ashley Robinson,^1* Alastair B. Monk,² Jessica E. Cooper,³ Edward J. Feil,³ and Mark C. Enright⁴

New York Medical College, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Valhalla, New York 10595,¹ Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Internal Medicine, Richmond, Virginia 23298,² University of Bath, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, Bath, United Kingdom BA2 7AY,³ Imperial College London, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London, United Kingdom W2 1PG⁴

Received 20 July 2005/ Accepted 4 October 2005

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The accessory gene regulator (agr) locus influences the expression of many virulence genes in the human pathogen Staphylococcus aureus. Four allelic groups of agr, which generally inhibit the regulatory activity of each other, have been identified within the species. Interference in virulence gene expression caused by different agr groups has been suggested to be a mechanism for isolating bacterial populations and a fundamental basis for subdividing the species. To test the hypothesis that the species is phylogenetically structured according to agr groups, we mapped agr groups onto a clone phylogeny inferred from partial sequences of 14 genes from 27 genetically diverse strains. Shimodaira-Hasegawa and parametric bootstrap tests rejected the hypotheses that the species is subdivided into three or five monophyletic agr groups but failed to reject the hypothesis that the species is subdivided into two groups that each consist of multiple clonal complexes and multiple agr groups. Additional evidence for agr recombination is found from clustered polymorphisms in complete agr sequences. However, agr recombination has not occurred frequently or randomly through time, because the topology and branch lengths of the clone phylogeny are reflected within each agr group. To account for these observations, we propose a new evolutionary model that involves a genetically polymorphic ancestral population of S. aureus that horizontally transferred agr groups between two subspecies groups near the time that these subspecies groups diverged.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The accessory gene regulator (agr) locus of Staphylococcus aureus encodes a two-component signal transduction system that leads to down-regulation of surface proteins and up-regulation of secreted proteins during in vitro growth (32). A role for agr in virulence has been demonstrated by the attenuated virulence of agr mutants in different animal infection models (4, 6). The agr locus consists of the divergently transcribed P2 and P3 operons (reviewed in references 30 and 31). The P2 operon consists of the genes agrB, agrD, agrC, and agrA. In essence, AgrB activity leads to secretion of the autoinducing pheromone, AgrD, which binds to and activates the histidine kinase receptor, AgrC, which subsequently activates the response regulator, AgrA. The P3 operon consists of the regulatory effector molecule of the agr system, RNAIII, and the gene encoding delta-hemolysin, hld. Interestingly, amino acid changes within the AgrD pheromone can cause inhibition of agr activity. Four allelic groups of agr have been characterized in S. aureus (numbered I to IV) that generally induce agr activity within a group and inhibit agr activity between groups (21, 23). The inhibitory activity of these agr groups represents a form of bacterial interference that affects virulence gene expression (23).

It has been proposed that the inhibitory activity of agr groups may serve to isolate bacterial populations and facilitate the evolution of new strains or even species (31). This notion has been perpetuated by the observation that a given genetic background is usually represented by a given agr group; seldom is a given genetic background represented by multiple agr groups (56). Associations between agr group and other strain characteristics may include resistance to glycopeptides (agr's I and II) (41, 55), isolation from toxic shock syndrome and from community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus disease (agr III) (23, 52), and isolation from staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (agr IV) (21). These observations have led to the hypothesis that agr groups delineate fundamental subdivisions within the species (22, 30, 31, 56). However, a study of S. aureus population genetic structure based on multilocus sequence typing (MLST) hinted that the species may be fundamentally subdivided into two groups which each consist of multiple clonal complexes (11). The evolutionary relationships between the different clonal complexes represented by a given agr group have not been considered (56). Furthermore, epidemiological studies generally conclude that agr groups have no obvious influence on strain colonization and competition dynamics in humans (5, 24, 26, 46, 53), which questions the proposal that agr-mediated bacterial interference is an important means of isolating bacterial populations.

The mechanism by which agr groups diversify is also unknown. The P2 operon exhibits a hypervariable region that spans the 3' end of agrB, all of agrD, and the 5' end of agrC, flanked by conserved regions (23). The hypervariable region encodes the agr group specificity, and the separation between the hypervariable and conserved regions is abrupt. It has been noted that this genetic organization is consistent with both site-specific recombinational and hypermutational mechanisms of diversification (23, 30). Initial studies using partial agr sequences reported no evidence for recombination of agr within S. aureus (53) or between staphylococcal species (8). A recent study using partial agr sequences reported possible instances of horizontal genetic transfer of the hypervariable region of agr between strains with agr I and agr II (16).

Here, we analyze nucleotide sequence variation at 14 genes from 27 genetically diverse strains to obtain an improved clone phylogeny, upon which agr groups are mapped. We rigorously test hypotheses of the relationship between agr groups and clone phylogeny. We also obtain complete agr sequences from the diverse strains to study the mechanism of agr diversification.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Bacterial isolates. We studied a collection of 220 S. aureus isolates that were characterized previously (40). The collection includes methicillin-resistant S. aureus and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus from both hospital- and community-acquired disease and S. aureus from healthy carriers. Sequence fragments from these 220 isolates were obtained previously from the seven housekeeping genes used for multilocus sequence typing (MLST genes arcC, aroE, glpF, gmk, pta, tpi, and yqiL) (9) and from seven additional genes that encode putative surface proteins (SAS genes sasA, sasB, sasD, sasE, sasF, sasH, and sasI) (39). A subset of 27 genetically diverse strains was selected to represent the major clonal complexes of S. aureus (see Table 1, below). These 27 diverse strains represented 14 of the 18 major clonal complexes found in the MLST database (www.mlst.net) as of September 2005. A major clonal complex was stringently defined here as a group in which the multilocus sequence types (STs) were identical in sequence at six of seven MLST genes to at least one other ST in the group and for which a putative ancestral ST was assigned with >50% bootstrap support as assessed by the eBURST algorithm with 1,000 bootstrap replicates (12).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Genetic characteristics of 27 diverse strains

PCR screening and sequencing of agr. Chromosomal DNA was isolated with the DNeasy kit (QIAGEN). The primers of Peacock et al. (35) were used with PCR to screen the 220 isolates for the four recognized agr groups. Complete agr sequences, including portions of the flanking housekeeping genes, were obtained for the 27 diverse strains. The agr locus was sequenced from PCR products on both strands using an ABI 3700 automated sequencer (Perkin-Elmer) with seven primer sets: agrL1F (5'-TGAATGCTGAAGTAGATGTAGTCG-3') and agrL1R (5'-AGGTATATTTTCGCGTTGCTGTTC-3'), agrLDF (5'-ATTAAGATATCCTGCTCGTAGTGG-3') and agrLDR (5'-TGATGGAAAATAGTTGATGAGTTG-3'), hld276up (5'-ATGGTTATTAAGTTGGGATGG-3') and hld697dn (5'-CAATTTTACACCACTCTCCTCACT-3') or agrDR (5'-TCATGACGGAACTTGC-3'), agrX1F (5'-TCGTATAATGACAGTGAGGAGAGT-3') and agrCD2434dn (5'-TAATACCAATACTGCGACTT-3'), agrA2373up (5'-ACGTGCACAAGAAATGAGTAT-3') and agrA3130dn (5'-GTAAGCGTGTATGTGCAGTTTCTA-3'), agrARF (5'-ATGGTATCAAATTAGGCAGTG-3') and agrARR (5'-TTATTAGCAGGATTTTAGCAACC-3'), and agrR1F (5'-TTAATAGCACCATACTTCGTTGTC-3') and agrR1R (5'-CTGCGTTAGCTTTTGTGAGTTTG-3'). For some strains, the PCR screening primers were also used for sequencing. All PCR mixtures used for sequencing consisted of 1 µl template DNA, 1 µl each primer from 10-pM stocks, 1 µl deoxynucleoside triphosphates from 10-mM stocks, 5 µl Pfu buffer, 0.2 µl Taq-Pfu enzyme mix (Promega) at a 12:1 unit ratio, and 15 µl sterile distilled water. The PCR thermal cycling program was an initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, 30 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 50°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 2 min, and a final extension of 68°C for 4 min.

Sequence alignments. Sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW (51) with default parameters, followed by manual inspection. For sequences of unequal length, alignments were made on the translated amino acid sequences and back-translated to nucleotide sequences using MegAlign 5.00 (DNASTAR Inc.). Assignment of translational start and stop sites of different agr genes was based on the following annotations: agr's I, IV, and I/IV used the COL genome sequence (13), agr II used the N315 genome sequence (25, 41), and agr III used the MW2 genome sequence (1). AgrC of agr II is predicted to be a protein that is 59 amino acids shorter than the AgrC of other agr groups. Phylogenetic analyses conducted with an alternative translational start site for AgrC of agr II (23) and with the N315 annotation (25, 41) produced similar results.

Phylogenetic analyses. Insertion and deletion (indel) polymorphisms were excluded from all analyses. Optimal maximum likelihood models of nucleotide substitution, hereafter called optimal models, were determined using Modeltest 3.06 (36). Rate heterogeneity among sites was examined assuming a discrete gamma distribution with eight rate categories. Maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum parsimony (MP) phylogenetic trees were determined using PAUP*4.0b10 (48). For ML trees, we used the optimal model, a neighbor-joining starting tree, and tree-bisection-reconnection branch swapping unless nearest-neighbor interchange (NNI) is noted. For MP trees, we used parsimony-informative sites only, 20 replicates of random taxa addition, and tree-bisection-reconnection branch swapping. Nonparametric bootstrapping with 200 replicates was performed using a neighbor-joining analysis, with distances derived from the optimal model for the ML trees, or under parsimony with the procedures outlined above for MP trees. A detailed description of our use of the nonparametric Shimodaira-Hasegawa (SH) test of tree topologies (18, 45, 54) and sequence simulations (20, 38, 42), including their application to parametric bootstrap tests, is provided as supplementary text in the supplemental material.

Recombination analyses. Recombinant agr sequences were detected using RDP 2.0b08 (28). This program implements a variety of methods for detecting putative recombination events and breakpoints. The three methods that we utilized, Geneconv (43), MaxChi (47), and Chimaera (37), all make use of patterns of nucleotide substitution as a basis for detecting recombination. These methods are among the most powerful recombination detection methods available and are unlikely to infer a recombination event if one is not present (37). Settings for all methods were that sequences were linear, statistical significance was based at the P < 0.05 level, the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was applied, consensus daughter sequences were found, breakpoints were polished, and only events detected by two out of the three methods were examined.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The agr sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in GenBank with accession numbers DQ157957 to DQ157983.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
An improved clone phylogeny. To test hypotheses of the relationship between agr groups and clone phylogeny, we first focused on obtaining a reliable tree that depicts the evolutionary relationships between clonal complexes of S. aureus. A previous analysis based on the seven MLST genes hinted that the species may be fundamentally subdivided into two groups that each consist of multiple clonal complexes (11). However, statistical support for this subdivision was based on a more liberal measure of node support, Bayesian posterior probabilities (7), and a substantial amount of incongruence was observed among the seven MLST genes. We sought to examine the putative subdivision with a more conservative measure of node support, nonparametric bootstrapping (7), and we sought to boost the phylogenetic signal by adding seven SAS genes that encode putative surface proteins (39). Characteristics of the MLST, SAS, and COMBINED data sets are provided in Table S1 in the supplemental material.

The MLST data set resolved only one node with >70% bootstrap support in both ML and MP analyses (Fig. 1A). The SAS and COMBINED data sets resolved six and eight nodes, respectively, with >70% bootstrap support in both ML and MP analyses (Fig. 1B and C). Interestingly, the only node present on all three trees was the previously identified node that subdivided the species into two groups (Fig. 1A and C). This conserved node received an increased amount of bootstrap support on the COMBINED tree, 72% and 75% for ML and MP trees, respectively, beyond that of the trees from the individually analyzed data sets.

View larger version (25K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. ML phylogenetic trees based on (A) MLST, (B) SAS, and (C) COMBINED data sets. Nonparametric bootstrap support for nodes with >70% support in both ML and MP analyses are shown above and below the branches, respectively. The agr group and, in parentheses, the number of isolates screened from that clonal complex are shown adjacent to the COMBINED tree. Arrows indicate the position of the conserved node that subdivides the species into two groups.

Quantifying data set incongruence, error, and consistency. The MLST data set was incongruent with both the SAS and COMBINED trees (SH test, P < 0.05). The SAS and COMBINED data sets fit each other's trees as well as their own trees (SH test, P = 0.68 and P = 0.72). Although much of the incongruence in topology observed between the MLST tree and the SAS and COMBINED trees involves poorly supported nodes, some of the incongruence involves nodes with strong bootstrap support. For example, ST59 grouped with two different STs with >70% bootstrap support on the MLST and COMBINED trees (Fig. 1A and C).

To assess whether the observed incongruences could be due to statistical error in the data sets, we simulated sequences given the same optimal models and ML trees with branch lengths as the real data sets and tallied the number of times the real ML trees were recovered from the simulated sequences. The results showed that the simulated MLST data sets recovered their underlying tree only 0 to 2% of the time, and their power did not improve as longer sequences were simulated (Fig. 2). In contrast, the simulated SAS and COMBINED data sets recovered their underlying tree 8 to 79% and 35 to 85% of the time, respectively, and their power improved considerably as longer sequences were simulated (Fig. 2). These results suggest that the MLST data set alone was too statistically noisy and inconsistent to resolve a reliable tree. Although the COMBINED data set only attained 35% power, it was a statistically consistent data set and of sufficient power to resolve the conserved node with confidence.

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Results of sequence simulations to identify statistical error and consistency in the MLST (triangles), SAS (squares), and COMBINED (circles) data sets. Each point shows the probability of obtaining the correct tree given that the tree is true and represents 100 simulated data sets evaluated with ML analysis and NNI branch swapping.

The relationship between agr groups and clone phylogeny. We used PCR to determine agr group for 220 isolates. Only 199 of these isolates were of clonal complexes represented by the 27 diverse strains. The remaining 21 isolates were previously found to be recombinant in origin (40) and were excluded from further analyses. The agr groups of ST59 and ST182 were not correctly determined until representative strains were sequenced at the agr locus (described below). Nonetheless, all isolates of a given clonal complex were of the same agr group (Fig. 1C). These results confirm that, over the short term, agr group is a relatively stable characteristic of a clonal complex.

Note that the conserved node on the COMBINED tree subdivided the species into two groups that each consisted of multiple agr groups and that all of the nodes with strong bootstrap support were of multiple agr groups (Fig. 1C). Moreover, tree topologies constrained to include three or five monophyletic agr groups were incongruent with the COMBINED data set (SH test, P < 0.05). The tree topology constrained to include two polyphyletic agr groups was identical to the COMBINED tree, as expected (SH test, P = 1.00). These results seriously question the hypothesis that the species is subdivided in a manner that corresponds to agr groups and suggest that, over the long term, agr group is a relatively unstable characteristic of a clonal complex.

Parametric bootstrap tests of the competing hypotheses relating agr groups to clone phylogeny were conducted by simulating sequences assuming that the hypotheses were true. The differences in log likelihood () of an unconstrained tree and trees constrained to include three or five monophyletic agr groups based on the real COMBINED data set were enormous compared to the from COMBINED data sets simulated under each hypothesis ( = 706 [P < 0.01] and = 602 [P < 0.01], respectively). These tests therefore soundly rejected the hypotheses that the species is composed of three or five monophyletic agr groups but failed to reject the hypothesis that the species is composed of two polyphyletic agr groups as expected ( = 0, P = 1.00).

Our explanation for these results is that S. aureus is not fundamentally subdivided in a manner that corresponds to agr groups. Individual clonal complexes are predominately of a single agr group, which accounts for the previous observations that link agr group and genetic background. However, clonal complexes are assembled into broader subspecies groups that do not reflect a simple clonal descent of agr group within the species.

Patterns of genetic variation at the agr locus. To study genetic variation at the agr locus, we obtained complete agr sequences from all 27 diverse strains. Using the translated sequences of the P2 operon, we assigned unique amino acid sequences as agr alleles to reflect potential functional differences. Unique combinations of agr alleles were found for 22 of the 27 diverse strains, indicating that the different clonal complexes generally encode agr's that differ at the amino acid level (Table 1). agrA alleles were shared among agr groups, whereas agrB and agrC alleles were unique to agr groups (Table 1). agrD alleles defined agr groups, with the noted exception.

The housekeeping genes that flank the agr locus encode a putative carbon-nitrogen hydrolase and fructokinase. We excluded the sequences from the P3 operon from phylogenetic analyses, because this region is predicted to fold into elaborate RNA secondary structures (2) that would complicate the analyses. We included the coding nucleotide sequences from the P2 operon for analyses. Characteristics of the FLANKING and CODING data sets are provided in Table S1 in the supplemental material.

The FLANKING data set resolved four nodes with >70% bootstrap support in both ML and MP analyses (Fig. 3A). The CODING data set resolved three of the four recognized agr groups with >70% bootstrap support in both ML and MP analyses, and it resolved a novel agr group that branched in between agr's I and IV, here called agr I/IV (Fig. 3B). agr I received 100% bootstrap support in the MP analysis but only 58% bootstrap support in the ML analysis. A node that included agr's I, IV, and I/IV was resolved with >70% bootstrap support in both ML and MP analyses. The FLANKING and CODING data sets were statistically incongruent with each other's trees and with the MLST, SAS, and COMBINED trees (SH test, P < 0.05). However, the conserved node that subdivides the species into two groups was apparent on the FLANKING tree even though it did not attain sufficient bootstrap support and it did not include ST55 (Fig. 3A).

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 3. ML phylogenetic trees based on (A) FLANKING and (B) CODING data sets. Nonparametric bootstrap support for nodes with >70% support in both ML and MP analyses are shown above and below the branches, respectively. The arrow in panel A indicates the position of the conserved node that subdivides the species into two groups.

Surprisingly, phylogenetic analyses of the CODING and COMBINED data sets for the individual agr groups revealed that the individual agr trees were generally congruent with the clone phylogeny (Fig. 4). Characteristics of these six data sets are provided in Table S1 in the supplemental material. The CODING data set for agr's I, IV, and I/IV resolved five nodes with >70% bootstrap support in both ML and MP analyses (Fig. 4A). On the other hand, the CODING data set for agr III resolved no nodes with confidence (Fig. 4C). While the CODING data set for agr's I, IV, and I/IV was statistically incongruent with the COMBINED tree (SH test, P < 0.05), only ST45 and ST55 were out of place with respect to the clone phylogeny (Fig. 4A). The CODING data sets for agr's II and III were both congruent with the COMBINED tree (SH test, P > 0.71 in both cases), even though ST93 was also out of place with respect to the clone phylogeny (Fig. 4C).

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 4. ML phylogenetic trees based on the (A) CODINGI,IV,I/IV, (B) CODINGII, and (C) CODINGIII data sets. Nonparametric bootstrap support for nodes with >70% support in both ML and MP analyses are shown above and below the branches, respectively. Arrows indicate the position of the conserved node that subdivides the species into two groups.

These results indicate that the phylogenetic signal for the conserved node is weak but present in the genes that flank agr and within the individual agr groups. We highlight the observation that both the topology and branch lengths of the clone phylogeny are reflected on the individual agr trees with few exceptions (compare Fig. 1C and 4). This observation is also apparent on the tips of the grand CODING tree (within agr groups only [Fig. 3B]) but is more readily seen on the individual agr trees (Fig. 4).

Detection of recombination. We sought additional evidence for recombination at the agr locus by examining polymorphisms in the agr sequences. To reduce the risk that clustering of polymorphic sites might be due to selective constraints on this functionally interacting locus, we conducted recombination analyses on the CODING data sets of the individual agr groups using only third-codon positions. Even though this approach to detecting recombination is conservative, numerous putative recombination events were detected with high levels of statistical significance (P << 0.05). Example recombinant sequences from each agr group are presented in Fig. 5. Evidence for recombination was detected by all three recombination tests in the examples presented in Fig. 5A to C and by two of three recombination tests in the example presented in Fig. 5D.

View larger version (52K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 5. Alignment of polymorphic nucleotide sites from third codon positions from the CODING data sets of separate agr groups: (A) 146 sites from the CODINGI,IV,I/IV data set; (B) 79 sites from the CODINGI,IV,I/IV data set; (C) 64 sites from the CODINGII data set; and (D) 44 sites from the CODINGIII data set. Dots indicate nucleotide identity with the top sequence. Underlining indicates putative recombination breakpoints identified from the MaxChi tests. A map of the agr locus is shown below each alignment, with vertical bars marking the bounds of the following genes (left to right): agrB, agrD, agrC, and agrA.

Although it is difficult to judge whether these examples are representative of the types of recombinations that occur at the agr locus, we estimate that their average recombinant fragment size was a minimum of 612 bp. It is interesting that the average size of an agr coding gene is 671 bp. Thus, on average, recombination events of these sorts may tend to replace most of an agr coding gene. These examples demonstrate that recombination can occur within all four coding genes of the P2 operon and within the conserved and hypervariable regions. These results are not consistent with a site-specific recombinational mechanism of agr evolution.

The sequence characteristics of agr I/IV deserve special consideration. Our finding of clustered polymorphisms from third codon positions within agr I/IV that matched agr's I and IV in different regions of the locus (Fig. 5A) strongly supports a hypothesis of its recombinant origin. In contrast, if agr I/IV were an intermediate between agr's I and IV, the polymorphisms from third codon positions should not be clustered. Inspection of the entire agr I/IV coding sequence (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) reveals that it has characteristics of agr I from the 5' end of agrB through agrD, characteristics of agr IV from the middle of agrC through agrA, and unique characteristics in portions of agrB and in the 5' end of agrC.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Causes of phylogenetic incongruence. Incongruence between the evolutionary histories of bacterial strains and genes can have many causes. Natural selection is one cause of phylogenetic incongruence, and evidence for the covariation of agrB, agrD, and agrC has been reported (8). Here, we discuss other causes of incongruence, including error, recombination, and ancestral polymorphism. Error can be due to biological factors, such as differing base compositions and substitution biases in the sequences, high mutation rates, or too few mutations, and nonbiological factors, such as misspecification of nucleotide substitution models and sequencing errors. Error can affect data sets randomly and systematically, depending on its source. Our simulation studies, which attempted to quantify error and consistency, are a novel application of a phylogenetic tool (42) to a question involving intraspecific bacterial variation.

Recombination is a well-known phenomenon that influences the evolution of strains and genes (10). With recombination, the bacterial chromosome is essentially subdivided into mobile linkage blocks that can reflect different evolutionary histories. Since the inference of strain relatedness can differ depending on which linkage block is investigated (40), it is important to be able to detect recombination. Fortunately, powerful statistical tools are available for detecting recombination (37). The identification of clustered polymorphisms from third codon positions within each agr group provided the strongest evidence for recombination at the agr locus.

Recognition that S. aureus has a novel agr group with characteristics of both agr's I and IV might help to reconcile the conflict as to whether agr IV induces agr I activity (21, 27) or inhibits agr I activity (17, 29). The activity of a true agr I may be different from that of agr I/IV. The genetic variation characterized here makes it possible to distinguish between these related alleles. We are aware of two other reports of a novel agr. Takeuchi et al. (50) isolated two strains with an agr similar to agr I across the 3' end of the locus but similar to agr's II and III across the 5' end of the locus (14, 15). Goerke et al. (16) isolated one strain with an agr similar to agr I across agrD but similar to agr IV elsewhere in the locus. We compared single sequences of each of our agr groups with the novel agr Ic sequence reported by Goerke et al. (16) and found agr I/IV to be most similar to agr Ic, differing at 28 nucleotide sites across three regions of clustered polymorphisms (data not shown). Thus, we believe that agr Ic is a recombinant variant of agr I/IV rather than an evolutionary intermediate. We note that recombination at the agr locus followed by selection for particular variants provides a simple mechanism by which novel agr alleles can originate. Since agr dysfunction might be a selectable trait under certain conditions (41, 44), variant agr alleles in various stages of divergence would not necessarily have to be functional to be maintained in the population.

Ancestral polymorphism is seldom discussed within the context of a single species (19) or with respect to bacteria, but this phenomenon could be a cause of phylogenetic incongruence in studies aimed at characterizing intraspecific bacterial variation. Lineage sorting is the elimination of ancestral polymorphisms from a species. When speciation begins in sexual eukaryotes, the sister species will share ancestral polymorphisms. Genetic drift will stochastically shift the frequencies of these shared ancestral polymorphisms until each sister species becomes fixed for a given allele. Once genetic drift has led to monophyletic alleles at each locus, lineage sorting is complete; until this process is finished, lineage sorting is incomplete. With incomplete lineage sorting, incongruence between the species tree and gene trees will arise because different alleles will reach monophyly at different times (34, 49, 57). Bacterial populations cannot exist in a true state of incomplete lineage sorting because a diverging subspecies group of bacteria will have a single ancestral clone rather than a population of ancestors. However, recombination of ancestral polymorphisms into a diverging subspecies group of bacteria may mimic the phylogenetic pattern produced by incomplete lineage sorting. No standard statistical approaches are available for testing the hypothesis of ancestral polymorphism. Rather, efforts are made to rule out the other causes of phylogenetic incongruence.

New model for the evolution of agr. The hypothesis of Novick and colleagues proposes that the divergence of agr groups in S. aureus preceded the development of the nucleotide polymorphisms currently used for strain typing and, therefore, that the species is phylogenetically structured according to agr groups (56). Their hypothesis is based on the observation that no multilocus sequence type (or other means of strain typing) generally occurs in more than one agr group (56). We have confirmed that groups of closely related multilocus sequence types (or clonal complexes) tend to be of a given agr group. However, we have also shown that clonal complexes themselves belong to at least two subspecies groups and that agr's I to III occur in both of these subspecies groups. Thus, because of recombination, agr's I to III are not monophyletic, and the hypothesis that the species is phylogenetically structured according to agr groups is refuted. We propose a new model for the evolution of agr that takes the evolutionary relatedness of the clonal complexes and their agr's into account.

T1 is the speciation event that led to the origin of S. aureus (Fig. 6). It is not clear what agr groups existed at T1 or their relative order of appearance. Related staphylococcal species have different agr groups from those found in S. aureus (8), and there is some evidence for cross-species activity of agr (33). Visual inspection of trees generated from partial nucleotide sequences of agrB, agrD, and agrC from many staphylococcal species (8) shows that agr's I and III generally cluster together, whereas agr II is basal and sometimes clusters with the agr's of other species. Thus, between T1 and T2 may be another node that represents a common ancestor for agr's I and III.

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 6. Model for the evolution of agr. The clone phylogeny (or species tree) is shown as a bold outline. The agr phylogenies are shown as thin lines within the clone phylogeny. Different agr groups are shown as shaded nodes. Major agr recombinations are shown with arrows. Historical events T1 through T4 are shown alongside the clone phylogeny and are described in the text.

T2 is the divergence of S. aureus into two subspecies groups (Fig. 6), as evidenced by the conserved node in nearly all of our data sets. We propose that the divergence of agr's I to III preceded the divergence of the two subspecies groups. This proposal is based on the simple reasoning that in order for the individual agr trees to reflect the topology and branch lengths of the clone phylogeny (compare Fig. 1C and 4), horizontal genetic transfers of agr between the two subspecies groups must have occurred near the time that these subspecies groups diverged and have since seldom occurred. In order for such transfers to have occurred at all, the genes for agr's I to III must have existed. In contrast, if agr recombination were frequent, then the agr and clone tree topologies would not match, and if agr recombination occurred at many time points, then the agr and clone tree branch lengths would not match.

An alternative hypothesis is that the divergence of the two subspecies groups preceded the divergence of the agr groups. We believe that under such a hypothesis the branch lengths of the individual agr trees would be a function of the relative order that the agr groups appeared and the time required for transfer of agr to the other subspecies group. Thus, under such a hypothesis the branch lengths of the individual agr trees could be of a variety of different lengths and would not be expected to reflect the branch lengths of the clone phylogeny. We note that recombinations involving the agr's of ST45 and ST93 may be more recent, and their longer branches (Fig. 4) may reflect a longer period of evolution within subspecies group 1. There is no requirement for our model to make assumptions about which subspecies group or agr group is ancestral, but we favor the notion that subspecies group 1 and agr I may be ancestral.

T3 is the divergence of agr's I and IV (Fig. 6). It is not proven that the divergence of agr's I and IV followed after the divergence of the two subspecies groups. That is, the event shown at T3 may have occurred before T2. However, the facts that agr IV is largely found within subspecies group 1 (a single isolate to the contrary was reported by Peacock et al. [35]) and the similarity between agr's I and IV is much greater than their similarity to agr's II and III supports the arrangement shown.

T4 is the recombination event between agr's I and IV, resulting in agr I/IV (Fig. 6). Since unique polymorphisms have already developed within agr I/IV and since this agr group is found in multiple clonal complexes, this recombination event is probably not very recent.

Ironically, S. aureus populations may yet become structured according to agr group even though it is not currently structured in this manner. The probability that a species tree and its gene trees will be congruent is related to T/2N_e, where T is the internode divergence time and N_e is the effective population size (34). In our model, T would be the time interval between T1 and T2. Longer internode times and smaller populations favor lineage sorting, whereas shorter internode times and larger populations favor incomplete lineage sorting (34). Eventually, genetic drift and selection may cause different agr groups to become fixed within the two subspecies groups in the same manner that different agr groups have become fixed within different staphylococcal species.

Concluding remarks. S. aureus is a species that currently has a relatively clonal population structure, in which variation at housekeeping genes is estimated to occur 15 times more often by point mutation than by recombination (11). Therefore, individual clonal complexes as well as broader subspecies groups are expected to have the same agr group due to simple clonal descent. However, we have presented a case here that recombination has been involved in distributing agr groups across the species. The variation of agr at the amino acid level may provide for a variation in agr activity beyond that of the consensus activities of four interference groups. Since agr influences the expression of many virulence genes (30, 31), small phenotypic differences encoded by different agr alleles might be selectable into larger evolutionary differences. It has been reported that the regulatory effects of agr can differ among strains (3). Thus, it is reasonable to hypothesize that recombination of agr between clonal complexes could occasionally result in novel, advantageous patterns of virulence gene expression. It may be that host-pathogen interactions affected by agr-mediated virulence gene expression are more important in the evolution of S. aureus than pathogen-pathogen interactions affected by agr-mediated bacterial interference.

 
We thank D. Bessen, G. Lina, G. Sakoulas, and J. Wertz for reviewing the manuscript.

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust. E. Feil is funded by an MRC Career Development Award. M. C. Enright is a Royal Society University Research Fellow.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: New York Medical College, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Valhalla, NY 10595. Phone: (914) 594-4973. Fax: (914) 594-4176. E-mail: ashley_robinson{at}nymc.edu.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1
1. Baba, T., F. Takeuchi, M. Kuroda, H. Yuzawa, K. Aoki, A. Oguchi, Y. Nagai, N. Iwama, K. Asano, T. Naimi, H. Kuroda, L. Cui, K. Yamamoto, and K. Hiramatsu. 2002. Genome and virulence determinants of high virulence community-acquired MRSA. Lancet 359:1819-1827.[CrossRef][Medline]
2
2. Benito, Y., F. A. Kolb, P. Romby, G. Lina, J. Etienne, and F. Vandenesch. 2000. Probing the structure of RNAIII, the Staphylococcus aureus agr regulatory RNA, and identification of the RNA domain involved in repression of protein A expression. RNA 6:668-679.[Abstract]
3
3. Blevins, J. S., K. E. Beenken, M. O. Elasri, B. K. Hurlburt, and M. S. Smeltzer. 2002. Strain-dependent differences in the regulatory roles of sarA and agr in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 70:470-480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Bunce, C., L. Wheeler, G. Reed, J. Musser, and N. Barg. 1992. Murine model of cutaneous infection with gram-positive cocci. Infect. Immun. 60:2636-2640.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Cespedes, C., B. Said-Salim, M. Miller, S. H. Lo, B. N. Kreiswirth, R. J. Gordon, P. Vavagiakis, R. S. Klein, and F. D. Lowy. 2005. The clonality of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage. J. Infect. Dis. 191:444-452.[CrossRef][Medline]
6
6. Cheung, A. L., K. J. Eberhardt, E. Chung, M. R. Yeaman, P. M. Sullam, M. Ramos, and A. S. Bayer. 1994. Diminished virulence of a sar^–/agr^– mutant of Staphylococcus aureus in the rabbit model of endocarditis. J. Clin. Investig. 94:1815-1822.
7
7. Douady, C. J., F. Delsuc, Y. Boucher, W. F. Doolittle, and E. J. P. Douzery. 2003. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:248-254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8
8. Dufour, P., S. Jarraud, F. Vandenesch, T. Greenland, R. P. Novick, M. Bes, J. Etienne, and G. Lina. 2002. High genetic variability of the agr locus in Staphylococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 184:1180-1186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Enright, M. C., N. P. Day, C. E. Davies, S. J. Peacock, and B. G. Spratt. 2000. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1008-1015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10
10. Feil, E. J. 2004. Small change: keeping pace with microevolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2:483-495.[CrossRef][Medline]
11
11. Feil, E. J., J. E. Cooper, H. Grundmann, D. A. Robinson, M. C. Enright, T. Berendt, S. J. Peacock, J. M. Smith, M. Murphy, B. G. Spratt, C. E. Moore, and N. P. Day. 2003. How clonal is Staphylococcus aureus? J. Bacteriol. 185:3307-3316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12
12. Feil, E. J., B. C. Li, D. M. Aanensen, W. P. Hanage, and B. G. Spratt. 2004. eBURST: inferring patterns of evolutionary descent among clusters of related bacterial genotypes from multilocus sequence typing data. J. Bacteriol. 186:1518-1530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13
13. Gill, S. R., D. E. Fouts, G. L. Archer, E. F. Mongodin, R. T. Deboy, J. Ravel, I. T. Paulsen, J. F. Kolonay, L. Brinkac, M. Beanan, R. J. Dodson, S. C. Daugherty, R. Madupu, S. V. Angiuoli, A. S. Durkin, D. H. Haft, J. Vamathevan, H. Khouri, T. Utterback, C. Lee, G. Dimitrov, L. Jiang, H. Qin, J. Weidman, K. Tran, K. Kang, I. R. Hance, K. E. Nelson, and C. M. Fraser. 2005. Insights on evolution of virulence and resistance from the complete genome analysis of an early methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain and a biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strain. J. Bacteriol. 187:2426-2438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14
14. Gilot, P., G. Lina, T. Cochard, and B. Poutrel. 2002. Analysis of the genetic variability of genes encoding the RNA III-activating components Agr and TRAP in a population of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from cows with mastitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:4060-4067.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
15. Gilot, P., and W. van Leeuwen. 2004. Comparative analysis of agr locus diversification and overall genetic variability among bovine and human Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:1265-1269.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
16. Goerke, C., S. Esser, M. Kummel, and C. Wolz. 2005. Staphylococcus aureus strain designation by agr and cap polymorphism typing and delineation of agr diversification by sequence analysis. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 295:67-75.[CrossRef][Medline]
17
17. Goerke, C., M. Kummel, K. Dietz, and C. Wolz. 2003. Evaluation of intraspecies interference due to agr polymorphism in Staphylococcus aureus during infection and colonization. J. Infect. Dis. 188:250-256.[CrossRef][Medline]
18
18. Goldman, N., J. P. Anderson, and A. G. Rodrigo. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49:652-670.[CrossRef][Medline]
19
19. Hare, M. P., and J. C. Avise. 1998. Population structure in the American oyster as inferred by nuclear gene genealogies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:119-128.[Abstract]
20
20. Hillis, D. M., B. K. Mable, and C. Moritz. 1996. Applications of molecular systematics: the state of the field and a look to the future, p. 515-543. In D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable (ed.), Molecular systematics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
21
21. Jarraud, S., G. J. Lyon, A. M. Figueiredo, L. Gerard, F. Vandenesch, J. Etienne, T. W. Muir, and R. P. Novick. 2000. Exfoliatin-producing strains define a fourth agr specificity group in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 182:6517-6522.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22
22. Jarraud, S., C. Mougel, J. Thioulouse, G. Lina, H. Meugnier, F. Forey, X. Nesme, J. Etienne, and F. Vandenesch. 2002. Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human disease. Infect. Immun. 70:631-641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23
23. Ji, G., R. Beavis, and R. P. Novick. 1997. Bacterial interference caused by autoinducing peptide variants. Science 276:2027-2030.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24
24. Kahl, B. C., K. Becker, A. W. Friedrich, J. Clasen, B. Sinha, C. Von Eiff, and G. Peters. 2003. agr-dependent bacterial interference has no impact on long-term colonization of Staphylococcus aureus during persistent airway infection of cystic fibrosis patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5199-5201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25
25. Kuroda, M., T. Ohta, I. Uchiyama, T. Baba, H. Yuzawa, I. Kobayashi, L. Cui, A. Oguchi, K. Aoki, Y. Nagai, J. Lian, T. Ito, M. Kanamori, H. Matsumaru, A. Maruyama, H. Murakami, A. Hosoyama, Y. Mizutani-Ui, N. K. Takahashi, T. Sawano, R. Inoue, C. Kaito, K. Sekimizu, H. Hirakawa, S. Kuhara, S. Goto, J. Yabuzaki, M. Kanehisa, A. Yamashita, K. Oshima, K. Furuya, C. Yoshino, T. Shiba, M. Hattori, N. Ogasawara, H. Hayashi, and K. Hiramatsu. 2001. Whole genome sequencing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 357:1225-1240.[CrossRef][Medline]
26
26. Lina, G., F. Boutite, A. Tristan, M. Bes, J. Etienne, and F. Vandenesch. 2003. Bacterial competition for human nasal cavity colonization: role of staphylococcal agr alleles. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:18-23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27
27. Lyon, G. J., J. S. Wright, T. W. Muir, and R. P. Novick. 2002. Key determinants of receptor activation in the agr autoinducing peptides of Staphylococcus aureus. Biochemistry 41:10095-10104.[CrossRef][Medline]
28
28. Martin, D. P., C. Williamson, and D. Posada. 2005. RDP2: recombination detection and analysis from sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 21:260-262.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29
29. McDowell, P., Z. Affas, C. Reynolds, M. T. Holden, S. J. Wood, S. Saint, A. Cockayne, P. J. Hill, C. E. Dodd, B. W. Bycroft, W. C. Chan, and P. Williams. 2001. Structure, activity and evolution of the group I thiolactone peptide quorum-sensing system of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol. 41:503-512.[CrossRef][Medline]
30
30. Novick, R. P. 2000. Pathogenicity factors and their regulation, p. 392-407. In V. A. Fischetti, R. P. Novick, J. J. Ferretti, D. A. Portnoy, and J. I. Rood (ed.), Gram-positive pathogens. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
31
31. Novick, R. P. 2003. Autoinduction and signal transduction in the regulation of staphylococcal virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 48:1429-1449.[CrossRef][Medline]
32
32. Novick, R. P., H. F. Ross, S. J. Projan, J. Kornblum, B. Kreiswirth, and S. Moghazeh. 1993. Synthesis of staphylococcal virulence factors is controlled by a regulatory RNA molecule. EMBO J. 12:3967-3975.[Medline]
33
33. Otto, M. 2001. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis peptide pheromones produced by the accessory gene regulator agr system. Peptides 22:1603-1608.[CrossRef][Medline]
34
34. Pamilo, P., and M. Nei. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:568-583.[Abstract]
35
35. Peacock, S. J., C. E. Moore, A. Justice, M. Kantzanou, L. Story, K. Mackie, G. O'Neill, and N. P. Day. 2002. Virulent combinations of adhesin and toxin genes in natural populations of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 70:4987-4996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36
36. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37
37. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 2001. Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: computer simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:13757-13762.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38
38. Rambaut, A., and N. C. Grassly. 1997. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:235-238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39
39. Robinson, D. A., and M. C. Enright. 2003. Evolutionary models of the emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3926-3934.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40
40. Robinson, D. A., and M. C. Enright. 2004. Evolution of Staphylococcus aureus by large chromosomal replacements. J. Bacteriol. 186:1060-1064.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41
41. Sakoulas, G., G. M. Eliopoulos, R. C. Moellering, Jr., C. Wennersten, L. Venkataraman, R. P. Novick, and H. S. Gold. 2002. Accessory gene regulator (agr) locus in geographically diverse Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1492-1502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42
42. Sanderson, M. J., M. F. Wojciechowski, J. M. Hu, T. S. Khan, and S. G. Brady. 2000. Error, bias, and long-branch attraction in data for two chloroplast photosystem genes in seed plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:782-797.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43
43. Sawyer, S. 1989. Statistical tests for detecting gene conversion. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6:526-538.[Abstract]
44
44. Schwan, W. R., M. H. Langhorne, H. D. Ritchie, and C. K. Stover. 2003. Loss of hemolysin expression in Staphylococcus aureus agr mutants correlates with selective survival during mixed infections in murine abscesses and wounds. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 38:23-28.[CrossRef][Medline]
45
45. Shimodaira, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1114-1116.
46
46. Shopsin, B., B. Mathema, P. Alcabes, B. Said-Salim, G. Lina, A. Matsuka, J. Martinez, and B. N. Kreiswirth. 2003. Prevalence of agr specificity groups among Staphylococcus aureus strains colonizing children and their guardians. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:456-459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47
47. Smith, J. M. 1992. Analyzing the mosaic structure of genes. J. Mol. Evol. 34:126-129.[Medline]
48
48. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and other methods, version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
49
49. Takahata, N. 1989. Gene genealogy in three related populations: consistency probability between gene and population trees. Genetics 122:957-966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50
50. Takeuchi, S., T. Maeda, N. Hashimoto, K. Imaizumi, T. Kaidoh, and Y. Hayakawa. 2001. Variation of the agr locus in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cows with mastitis. Vet. Microbiol. 79:267-274.[CrossRef][Medline]
51
51. Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52
52. Vandenesch, F., T. Naimi, M. C. Enright, G. Lina, G. R. Nimmo, H. Heffernan, N. Liassine, M. Bes, T. Greenland, M. E. Reverdy, and J. Etienne. 2003. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes: worldwide emergence. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 9:978-984.[Medline]
53
53. van Leeuwen, W., W. van Nieuwenhuizen, C. Gijzen, H. Verbrugh, and A. van Belkum. 2000. Population studies of methicillin-resistant and -sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strains reveal a lack of variability in the agrD gene, encoding a staphylococcal autoinducer peptide. J. Bacteriol. 182:5721-5729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54
54. van Rij, R. P., M. Worobey, J. A. Visser, and H. Schuitemaker. 2003. Evolution of R5 and X4 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gag sequences in vivo: evidence for recombination. Virology 314:451-459.[CrossRef][Medline]
55
55. Verdier, I., M. E. Reverdy, J. Etienne, G. Lina, M. Bes, and F. Vandenesch. 2004. Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides belong to accessory gene regulator group I or II. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1024-1027.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56
56. Wright, J. S., III, K. E. Traber, R. Corrigan, S. A. Benson, J. M. Musser, and R. P. Novick. 2005. The agr radiation: an early event in the evolution of staphylococci. J. Bacteriol. 187:5585-5594.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
57
57. Wu, C. I. 1991. Inferences of species phylogeny in relation to segregation of ancient polymorphisms. Genetics 127:429-435.[Abstract]

---

Journal of Bacteriology, December 2005, p. 8312-8321, Vol. 187, No. 24
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.187.24.8312-8321.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Sugiyama, Y., Okii, K., Murakami, Y., Yokoyama, T., Takesue, Y., Ohge, H., Sueda, T., Hiyama, E. (2009). Changes in the agr Locus Affect Enteritis Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 1528-1535 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Perez-Vazquez, M., Vindel, A., Marcos, C., Oteo, J., Cuevas, O., Trincado, P., Bautista, V., Grundmann, H., Campos, J., on behalf of the EARSS Spain spa-typing Group, (2009). Spread of invasive Spanish Staphylococcus aureus spa-type t067 associated with a high prevalence of the aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme gene ant(4')-Ia and the efflux pump genes msrA/msrB. J Antimicrob Chemother 63: 21-31 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ruimy, R., Maiga, A., Armand-Lefevre, L., Maiga, I., Diallo, A., Koumare, A. K., Ouattara, K., Soumare, S., Gaillard, K., Lucet, J.-C., Andremont, A., Feil, E. J. (2008). The Carriage Population of Staphylococcus aureus from Mali Is Composed of a Combination of Pandemic Clones and the Divergent Panton-Valentine Leukocidin-Positive Genotype ST152. J. Bacteriol. 190: 3962-3968 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Collery, M. M., Smyth, D. S., Twohig, J. M., Shore, A. C., Coleman, D. C., Smyth, C. J. (2008). Molecular typing of nasal carriage isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from an Irish university student population based on toxin gene PCR, agr locus types and multiple locus, variable number tandem repeat analysis. J Med Microbiol 57: 348-358 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bannoehr, J., Ben Zakour, N. L., Waller, A. S., Guardabassi, L., Thoday, K. L., van den Broek, A. H. M., Fitzgerald, J. R. (2007). Population Genetic Structure of the Staphylococcus intermedius Group: Insights into agr Diversification and the Emergence of Methicillin-Resistant Strains. J. Bacteriol. 189: 8685-8692 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Holtfreter, S., Grumann, D., Schmudde, M., Nguyen, H. T. T., Eichler, P., Strommenger, B., Kopron, K., Kolata, J., Giedrys-Kalemba, S., Steinmetz, I., Witte, W., Broker, B. M. (2007). Clonal Distribution of Superantigen Genes in Clinical Staphylococcus aureus Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 2669-2680 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Monk, A. B., Archer, G. L. (2007). Use of Outer Surface Protein Repeat Regions for Improved Genotyping of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 730-735 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Buzzola, F. R., Alvarez, L. P., Tuchscherr, L. P. N., Barbagelata, M. S., Lattar, S. M., Calvinho, L., Sordelli, D. O. (2007). Differential Abilities of Capsulated and Noncapsulated Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Diverse agr Groups To Invade Mammary Epithelial Cells. Infect. Immun. 75: 886-891 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Francois, P., Koessler, T., Huyghe, A., Harbarth, S., Bento, M., Lew, D., Etienne, J., Pittet, D., Schrenzel, J. (2006). Rapid Staphylococcus aureus agr Type Determination by a Novel Multiplex Real-Time Quantitative PCR Assay.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 1892-1895 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cooper, J. E., Feil, E. J. (2006). The phylogeny of Staphylococcus aureus - which genes make the best intra-species markers?. Microbiology 152: 1297-1305 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Supplemental material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Robinson, D. A. Articles by Enright, M. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Robinson, D. A. Articles by Enright, M. C.