JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dippel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Boos, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dippel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Boos, W.
Journal of Bacteriology, December 2005, p. 8322-8331, Vol. 187, No. 24
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.187.24.8322-8331.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

The Maltodextrin System of Escherichia coli: Metabolism and Transport

Renate Dippel and Winfried Boos*

Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany

Received 27 May 2005/ Accepted 23 August 2005


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The maltose/maltodextrin regulon of Escherichia coli consists of 10 genes which encode a binding protein-dependent ABC transporter and four enzymes acting on maltodextrins. All mal genes are controlled by MalT, a transcriptional activator that is exclusively activated by maltotriose. By the action of amylomaltase, we prepared uniformly labeled [14C]maltodextrins from maltose up to maltoheptaose with identical specific radioactivities with respect to their glucosyl residues, which made it possible to quantitatively follow the rate of transport for each maltodextrin. Isogenic malQ mutants lacking maltodextrin phosphorylase (MalP) or maltodextrin glucosidase (MalZ) or both were constructed. The resulting in vivo pattern of maltodextrin metabolism was determined by analyzing accumulated [14C]maltodextrins. MalP– MalZ+ strains degraded all dextrins to maltose, whereas MalP+ MalZ– strains degraded them to maltotriose. The labeled dextrins were used to measure the rate of transport in the absence of cytoplasmic metabolism. Irrespective of the length of the dextrin, the rates of transport at a submicromolar concentration were similar for the maltodextrins when the rate was calculated per glucosyl residue, suggesting a novel mode for substrate translocation. Strains lacking MalQ and maltose transacetylase were tested for their ability to accumulate maltose. At 1.8 nM external maltose, the ratio of internal to external maltose concentration under equilibrium conditions reached 106 to 1 but declined at higher external maltose concentrations. The maximal internal level of maltose at increasing external maltose concentrations was around 100 mM. A strain lacking malQ, malP, and malZ as well as glycogen synthesis and in which maltodextrins are not chemically altered could be induced by external maltose as well as by all other maltodextrins, demonstrating the role of transport per se for induction.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The Escherichia coli maltodextrin system has become a paradigm for the understanding of a complex sugar-utilizing system in bacteria (5, 55). The regulon is controlled by MalT, the central activator of the system, and consists of 10 coordinately regulated genes that are geared for the utilization of maltose and maltodextrins. Five genes encode a high-affinity and binding protein-dependent ABC transporter comprising LamB, a specific outer membrane diffusion porin, the {lambda} receptor or maltoporin (27, 51); a high-affinity maltose/maltodextrin binding protein in the periplasm, MalE, the major recognition site of the system (32); two tightly membrane-bound permease subunits, MalF and MalG (13, 28); and MalK, the ATP-hydrolyzing subunit of the transporter (located at the cytoplasmic side of the transporter) providing the necessary energy for active transport (1, 40, 58). Structural information on three components of the transporter is available: the structures of the {lambda} receptor (53), MalE (57, 59), and MalK (11) have been solved. The functional interaction between the subunits (41) has been studied, and models of active transport based on the biochemical characteristics of the transport components have been proposed previously (12, 14). The specificity of the intact transporter is limited by the specificity of the periplasmic maltose binding protein (MBP [= MalE]). MBP binds with high-affinity maltose (60) and maltodextrins composed of linearly {alpha}(1-4)-glucosidically linked glucose polymers, including amylose and starch (24), as well as {alpha}(1-4)-glucosidically linked cyclodextrins (60). There are two modes of ligand binding by MBP. High affinity requires a free reducing end of the maltodextrin molecule, while binding to extended polysaccharide chains is of lower affinity (29). Maltodextrins whose reducing end is blocked by residues larger than a methyl group (21), even though bound well by the binding protein, cannot be transported, indicating a polarity in the mechanism in which linear dextrins are channeled into the transporter (25, 52, 62). While maltose transport has been studied to some extent (21, 23, 38, 60), the transport of maltodextrins is less well understood. Ferenci (22) has synthesized labeled maltodextrin by the transfer of unlabeled cyclic maltodextrins as the dextrinyl donor and [14C]maltose as the acceptor, resulting in linear, labeled dextrins of different chain lengths. With these dextrins in transport assays, it was established that there is a size limit for the maltose transporter that occurs at around 8 to 10 glucosyl residues. However, from the technique of synthesis, the specific radioactivity of the different dextrins remained undefined, not allowing a quantitative transport analysis between the different linear maltodextrins (22). From studies using unlabeled maltodextrins of different chain lengths as a carbon source, it has been concluded that maltodextrins of up to seven glucosyl units exhibit about the same growth rate. Longer dextrins resulted in an increasingly reduced growth rate, again indicating that these dextrins were no longer transported (63). Traditionally, binding protein-dependent transport systems are regarded as unidirectional, where the transport step is coupled to the hydrolysis of ATP (4). In the maltose system, the exit of accumulated maltose from mutant cells unable to metabolize it can be observed. This exit, unlike the entry by the transporter, is blocked by uncouplers of oxidative phosphorylation. Thus, the exit appears to be independent of the entry reaction and catalyzed by a different system (23).

The metabolism of maltodextrins once inside the cell is achieved by three enzymes whose encoding genes are controlled by MalT. MalQ is an amylomaltase (39, 47, 65, 66), an obligatory glucanosyltransferase producing from any linear maltodextrin a mixture of maltodextrins plus glucose (44). Mutants lacking amylomaltase can no longer grow on maltose but can grow on maltodextrins with a chain length of four or more glucosyl residues (55). This is due to the second enzyme, maltodextrin phosphorylase encoded by malP, which removes by phosphorolysis the nonreducing glucosyl residue to yield {alpha}-glucose-1-phosphate (glucose-1-P) (56, 64). Maltodextrin phosphorylase recognizes maltodextrins at a minimum of four glucosyl residues. Mutants lacking this enzyme still grow on maltose but then accumulate large amounts of linear dextrins due to the action of amylomaltase. Under these conditions, the cells become large and stain blue in the presence of iodine. Thus, metabolism of maltose and maltodextrins in a wild-type strain leads to the production of glucose and glucose-1-P, which enter glycolysis after the transformation to glucose-6-P by glucokinase and phosphoglucomutase, respectively.

The third enzyme, maltodextrin glucosidase encoded by malZ (52), is not essential for maltose or maltodextrin utilization. Its activity can be described as an enzyme that removes glucose residues from the reducing end of maltodextrins more than two glucose units long (61). Maltose itself is not a substrate of the enzyme. The enzyme also hydrolyzes {gamma}-cyclodextrin very effectively (45), even though it is unclear how this sugar should arise inside the cell. E. coli does not transport {gamma}-cyclodextrin. Mutants lacking malZ have no maltose-negative phenotype, but they cannot grow on maltose in the absence of phosphoglucomutase that transforms glucose-1-P reversibly into glucose-6-P. Mutants lacking this enzyme but containing MalZ grow normally on maltose (45). The last MalT-dependent enzyme is a periplasmic amylase, MalS (54). This enzyme cleaves maltodextrins more than two glucose units long as well as cyclodextrins (26). The preferred dextrin released from long dextrins is maltohexaose (27). The role of this enzyme is unclear. Mutants lacking it show only a slight disadvantage in growth on long maltodextrins.

The regulation of the maltose system is specifically controlled by MalT acting as an inducer-dependent mal gene activator (50). Even though in vivo, the maltose system is induced by all maltodextrins in the medium serving as a carbon source, in vitro, MalT is activated only to stimulate malP transcription by maltotriose (49). Thus, it is assumed that the exclusive inducer maltotriose is formed internally by the metabolism of maltose and maltodextrins.

A particular regulatory feature of the maltose system is its constitutivity, as observed in malQ mutants. This is due to endogenously produced maltotriose that is derived from the degradation of glycogen. Obviously, degradation of glycogen also occurs in the wild type, but in this case, the maltodextrins formed from glycogen are effectively funneled into glucose and glucose-1-P, thus keeping the inducer concentration low (15). The maltose system is subjected to catabolite repression as well as inducer exclusion. Thus, the expression of malT as well as some of the MalT-dependent genes (i.e., the ones encoding transport proteins) is controlled by the cyclic AMP/catabolite gene activator protein system (10), which in turn is controlled by the PtsG-mediated transport of glucose (46). EIIAGlc-mediated catabolite repression on malT is also exerted by growth on glycerol, most likely affecting the EIIAGlc-P-dependent stimulation of adenylate cyclase by glycerol-3-P (19, 20). The target of inducer exclusion is MalK, the ATP-hydrolyzing subunit of the maltose/maltodextrin ABC transporter (33). In this process, unphosphorylated EIIAGlc of the glucose-specific phosphotransferase system (PTS) is thought to interact with the regulatory domain of MalK to curb transport activity (2, 11). The regulatory domain of MalK also interacts with MalT, inhibiting its activity as a transcriptional activator (31). There are several indications that it is the state of transport activity which controls the interaction of MalK with MalT and thus the activity of the latter (2, 6).

Not the activity but the expression of malT is controlled by Mlc, a transcriptional regulator acting as a repressor (16). The activity of Mlc as repressor is controlled by the PtsG-mediated transport of glucose. Instead of acting as an inducer for Mlc, this repressor is inactivated by sequestration to unphosphorylated (and actively transporting) membrane-bound PtsG (34).

Here, we report the synthesis of 14C-labeled maltodextrins up to maltoheptaose and their use in metabolic studies as well as in quantitative transport analysis.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bacterial strains and growth conditions. We used E. coli K-12 strains derived from strain MC4100. The isogenic derivatives of these strains were constructed by P1vir transduction (37) using selectable antibiotic resistance insertions in the relevant genes. These strains are listed in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Strains and plasmids used in this study

 
Synthesis of radiolabeled maltodextrins. The synthesis was done according to the method of Pajatsch et al. (43) with alterations. Strain ST103 lacking MalQ, MalP, and MalZ was transformed with pCHAP113 harboring malQ under lac promoter control (47). The strain was grown in Luria broth and ampicillin (100 µg/ml) in the absence of isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (the strain did not contain the Lac repressor). Outgrown cells were harvested and resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)-10 mM MgSO4. Cellular extracts were obtained by passing the suspension through a French pressure cell at 16,000 lb/in2. The high-speed supernatant of the extract was dialyzed three times against 2 liters of the same buffer and adjusted to a protein concentration of 4.5 mg/ml. Analytical experiments for the synthesis of 14C-labeled maltodextrins were done as described in the legend to Fig. 1. To preparatively synthesize the dextrins, 1.25 µCi [14C]maltose (600 mCi/mmol, repurified; Hartmann) in 1,250 µl water containing 3% ethanol was buffered to 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 120 µl of the dialyzed extract described above was added. In preliminary experiments, it was established that ethanol up to a concentration of 10% did not interfere with the reaction. After 10 min at room temperature, the entire mixture was heated to the temperature of boiling water, the precipitate was removed by centrifugation, and the supernatant was applied as a single streak onto one sheet of Whatman 3MM chromatography paper and developed with butanol-ethanol-water at a ratio of 5:3:2 (vol/vol/vol) for 4 days by descending chromatography. Under these conditions, glucose as the sugar migrating fastest had left the paper and maltose was positioned close to the end of the 47-cm long paper. The paper was dried and exposed to X-ray film for 3 h. Strips containing the different maltodextrins up to maltoheptaose were cut out and eluted with water by descending chromatography. The eluates were collected in Eppendorf tubes, with the first 5 drops (about 250 µl) containing all the radioactivity. The different solutions were separately chromatographed once again under the same conditions. Based on the reaction mechanism of amylomaltase (44), all [14C]maltodextrins synthesized contained the same specific radioactivity with respect to their glucosyl residues. The purified samples were kept frozen.



View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. TLC analysis of amylomaltase-mediated synthesis of 14C-labeled maltodextrins. The incubation mixture contained in 15 µl of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, crude dialyzed extract (final concentration, 1.5 mg protein/ml) of a strain containing overexpressed amylomaltase, 20 µM [14C]maltose, and the following unlabeled sugars at a 3 mM final concentration: in lanes 1 and 2, no addition; in lanes 3 and 4, maltose; in lanes 5 and 6, maltotriose; in lanes 7 and 8, maltotetraose; in lanes 9 and 10, maltopentaose; in lanes 11 and 12, maltohexaose; and in lanes 13 and 14, maltoheptaose. Lane M, flanking right, standard [14C]maltose; lane G, flanking left, standard [14C]glucose. Six-microliter samples were spotted on a TLC plate at 1 min after addition of the enzyme (odd-numbered lanes) and after 15 min (even-numbered lanes). Autoradiography was for 24 h.

 
Analysis of the metabolic fate of the different 14C-labeled maltodextrins in different strains. The strains mentioned in the legend to Fig. 2 were grown overnight in NZA medium (10 g NZ-amine A [Sheffield Products Inc.]-5 g yeast extract-7.5 g NaCl in 1 liter distilled water). They were washed once with minimal medium A (MMA) (37) and resuspended in MMA to an optical density at 578 nm (OD578) of 0.5. A total of 0.015 to 0.02 µCi of the different 14C-labeled maltodextrins was added, the suspensions were centrifuged after 10 min of incubation, and the pellets were treated with 5 µl 12% trichloroacetic acid (TCA), kept on ice for 10 min, and centrifuged. The TCA supernatant was spotted on thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates, developed in n-butanol-ethanol-water at a ratio of 5:3:2 (vol/vol/vol), and autoradiographed for 1 week.





View larger version (344K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG.2. Fate of maltodextrins after accumulation in malQ strains lacking different maltodextrin-specific enzymes. The different strains were grown in NZA medium overnight. They were resuspended in MMA to an OD578 of 0.5. Next, 0.015 to 0.02 µCi 14C-labeled maltodextrins (lane VII, maltoheptaose; lane VI, maltohexaose; lane V, maltopentaose; lane IV, maltotetraose; lane III, maltotriose; lane II, maltose) was added and the mixtures were incubated for 5 min. The pelleted bacteria were treated with TCA, and the supernatant was applied on TLC plates. Autoradiography was done for 1 week. The set at the right hand side of the figure (lanes 2 to 5) represents the corresponding dextrins without cells having the indicated numbers of glucosyl residues. Lane G, [14C]glucose standard; lane M, [14C]maltose. (A) Strain ST103 (MalQ– MalP– MalZ–); (B) strain ME469 (MalQ– MalP– MalZ+); (C) strain JH1 (MalQ– MalZ– MalP+).

 
Transport assays of [14C]maltose as a measure of mal gene expression. Strains were grown in MMA plus 0.4% Casamino Acids (CAA) or MMA plus 0.4% glycerol as the sole source of carbon. Alterations are indicated in the tables. After being washed in MMA three times, the cells were resuspended in 3 ml MMA to an OD578 of 0.1 and the assay was initiated by the addition of 70 nM [14C]maltose (600 mCi/mmol; Amersham) or labeled maltodextrins of identical specific radioactivities (with respect to the glucosyl moieties). Five 0.5-ml samples were removed within a time interval of 2 min. The initial rate of uptake at time zero was extrapolated mathematically. When higher substrate concentrations were used, the same amount of radioactive substrate was mixed with unlabeled maltodextrin prior to its addition to achieve the desired final concentration. To determine the equilibrium accumulation of [14C]maltose in strain CB47, the latter was grown in MMA plus glycerol and resuspended in 5 ml MMA to an OD578 of 0.02. Next, 29 nM [14C]maltose (final concentration, 600 mCi/mmol; Amersham) was added. Fifteen minutes after the addition, the entire volume was filtered through nitrocellulose filters (pore size, 0.45 µm; Schleicher und Schüll) and the filter was assayed without washing for radioactivity in a scintillation counter. The filtrate was collected, and 0.1 ml was also counted to determine the [14C]maltose remaining in the medium. Care was taken to ensure that net uptake had ceased after 15 min. When higher maltose concentrations were used, [14C]maltose was mixed with unlabeled maltose of the desired concentration prior to addition to the medium. The same amount of radioactivity was used in all experiments.

Exit of accumulated [14C]maltose from strain CB47 in the presence and absence of the plasmid-encoded sugar exit transporter. Both strain CB47 (lacking MalQ as well as maltose transacetylase, the maa gene product) and strain CB47 transformed with pBAD-YabM were grown overnight in MMA plus glycerol. Cells were washed three times with MMA and resuspended in 6 ml MMA to an OD578 of 0.2. [14C]maltose was added at an initial concentration of 137 nM. The concentration of [14C]maltose accumulated internally was determined to be 0.7 mM for both strains. After 15 min, 1 mM unlabeled maltose was added. Samples (0.5 ml) were removed at the time intervals shown in Fig. 3, filtered through nitrocellulose filters (pore size, 0.45 µm; Schleicher und Schüll), and counted in a scintillation counter.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3. Exit of [14C]maltose accumulated in CB47 by a plasmid encoding a sugar exit system. The culture was grown in MMA plus glycerol and resuspended in MMA without a carbon source to an OD578 of 0.2. [14C]maltose at 0.14 µM (final concentration) was added and incubated for 15 min. The internal [14C]maltose concentration had then reached about 0.7 mM under equilibrium conditions. Unlabeled maltose (1 mM) was added at time zero to the medium, and samples were taken thereafter, filtered, and analyzed for radioactivity. Loss of radioactivity from the cell is given in cpm remaining inside the cells corresponding to a culture volume of 0.5 ml. {blacksquare}, strain CB47; •, strain CB47 harboring the plasmid-encoded uninduced levels of YabM, a sugar exit system.

 

   RESULTS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Synthesis of [14C]labeled maltodextrins of equal specific radioactivities. A crude extract of a strain lacking the mal encoded enzymes but harboring pCHAP113 encoding amylomaltase (47) was used as the source for the enzymatic conversion of [14C]maltose into [14C]glucose and [14C]maltodextrins. Prior to the synthesis, the extract was carefully and extensively dialyzed to remove any unlabeled maltodextrins from the extract. Even though it has been reported that amylomaltase does not utilize maltose as substrate but utilizes it only as acceptor in the dextrinyl transfer reaction (44), we found that incubation of [14C]maltose (20 µM) with the extensively dialyzed extract led to the formation of 14C-labeled maltodextrins of various lengths as well as [14C]glucose. After the equilibrium was reached in little more than 1 min, the composition of the dextrin mixture did not change, even after long incubation periods (15 min). The samples were analyzed by TLC and autoradiographed (Fig. 1). To quantitatively separate the different 14C-labeled maltodextrins (Fig. 1, lane 2), we used chromatography paper (Whatman 3MM). After autoradiography, the respective paper strips were eluted with water. All 14C-labeled maltodextrins from maltose to maltoheptaose were chromatographed twice by this method and appeared essentially homogenous by the TLC criterion (Fig. 2).

Quantitative analysis of the amylomaltase-catalyzed reaction with [14C]maltose at a 20 µM concentration in the absence of any unlabeled maltodextrin (Fig. 1, lane 2) revealed a curious, nearly twofold stepwise decrease in molar yields with increasing chain lengths of the dextrin formed (Table 2). The presence of 3 mM unlabeled dextrins from maltose to maltoheptaose in the reaction mixture altered the equilibrium composition of the 14C-labeled dextrins formed with increasing chain lengths of the unlabeled dextrins (Fig. 1). Thus, in the presence of unlabeled maltoheptaose,glucose qualitatively appeared to be the least prominent spot of the equilibrium mixture. This method is ideally suited to synthesizing radioactively labeled maltodextrins up to maltoheptaose with specific radioactivities up to the original activity of the starting [14C]maltose. The limit in heptaose is given by the limited separation power on chromatography paper under the given conditions of paper quality and solvent used.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Quantitative analysis of [14C]maltodextrins formed from [14C]maltose by MalQa

 
{We performed the amylomaltase-catalyzed reaction with commercial [14C]maltose from two sources, Amersham and Hartmann. Using Hartmann [14C]maltose, we observed that with some samples, all maltodextrins formed appeared on chromatography paper (but not on TLC plates) as doublets, allowing their separation. The analysis of this phenomenon revealed that all of the commercial [14C]maltose preparations tested contained various amounts (2 to 40%) of a disaccharide that is very similar to [14C]maltose (possibly isomaltose, {alpha}-1-6 glucosyl glucose) and that was stable and not interconvertible with maltose; it could be separated from maltose by using extended paper chromatography but was not a substrate of the E. coli maltose transporter and could not act as a dextrinyl donor in the amylomaltase reaction. However, it acts as an acceptor in the amylomaltase reaction with maltose as the substrate and gives rise to a series of maltodextrins whose reducing end is most likely composed of the unknown disaccharide. The identity of this disaccharide was not further studied, but care was taken to use purified maltose in amylomaltase-catalyzed maltodextrin formation to ensure the identity of the radioactive dextrins with the series of linear {alpha}(1-4)maltooligosaccharides.}

Fate of maltodextrins after their accumulation in strains lacking different maltodextrin-metabolizing enzymes. To avoid fast degradation of the maltodextrins to glucose, all strains carried a mutation in malQ, abolishing amylomaltase (MalQ) activity. The strains carried various additional mutations, i.e., in malS (periplasmic amylase), malP (maltodextrin phosphorylase), malZ (maltodextrin glucosidase), amyA (cytoplasmic amylase), and glgA (glycogen synthase). Being MalQ–, they exhibited partially constitutive maltodextrin transport activity not requiring induction (15). The cells were exposed to the different purified 14C-labeled maltodextrins from maltose to maltoheptaose, incubated for 5 min, centrifuged, washed free from the external medium, and precipitated with TCA. The TCA supernatant was analyzed by TLC and autoradiographed (Fig. 2). The absence of MalQ, MalP, and MalZ was sufficient to allow the accumulation of all maltodextrins in a chemically unaltered form (Fig. 2A). In the absence of MalP but in the presence of MalZ, the end product of all maltodextrins was maltose, a sugar that does not induce the maltose system (Fig. 2B). Figure 2B also shows that the products left from maltoheptaose and maltohexaose are less prominent than those from maltose and maltotriose. Since the initial radioactivity was the same in all cases, this imbalance was due to the metabolism of glucose-1-P, glycolysis, and loss as CO2 cleaved off from the different dextrins. In the absence of MalZ but in the presence of MalP, the larger maltodextrins were all quickly degraded to maltotetraose. Maltotetraose at the given time of incubation was then partially transformed into maltotriose, whereas maltotriose itself was not further hydrolyzed (Fig. 2C). Here again, due to the formation of glucose by MalZ, followed by phosphorylation, glycolysis, and loss as CO2, the total product formation was smaller for larger dextrins than for smaller dextrins. The comparison between Fig. 2B and C shows that the action of MalP on the different dextrins (larger than maltotetraose) was much faster than that of MalZ. The ability of serving as a substrate for MalP decreased strongly with dextrins shorter than maltopentaose but still allowed maltotetraose to be a substrate for the formation of the inducer maltotriose. As is shown in the accompanying publication (17), the action of MalP is crucial to form glycogen-derived maltotriose, the inducer of the system. In contrast, the action of MalZ is to degrade maltotriose to the noninducer maltose. We noticed the formation of small amounts of a labeled compound that runs slightly ahead of maltotetraose (Fig. 2B and C, arrow). It is formed even when maltose is used as a substrate. Situated in its chromatographic behavior on TLC plates between maltotriose and maltotetraose, this compound behaved chromatographically similarly to {alpha}-cyclodextrin (six glucosyl residues in a ring) (43). It is unclear how this compound could be synthesized from maltodextrins via MalZ or MalP. MalZ is known to hydrolyze {gamma}-cyclodextrin (and ß-cyclodextrins weakly) to maltose and glucose, but not {alpha}-cyclodextrin (45). The presence or absence of glycogen did not affect its synthesis. We did not observe it in strains lacking all the mal enzymes (Fig. 2A). The compound was not further studied.

Occasionally, when maltose was accumulated (for instance, as seen in Fig. 2C, lane II), a small spot of radioactivity was seen migrating faster than glucose. This spot has previously been identified as acetyl maltose and was due to the action of maltose transacetylase. This enzyme does not use maltodextrinslarger than maltose as a substrate.

The presence or absence of amyA encoding a cytoplasmic amylase (48) had no effect on any of the above patterns (data not shown). Also, the presence or absence of glgA (encoding glycogen synthase) or malS (encoding periplasmic amylase) had no effect on the maltodextrin pattern seen in a malQ malZ malP+ or malQ malZ+ malP background (not shown).

The rate of transport of labeled maltodextrins declines as their size increases but appears constant when calculated per glucosyl residue. The availability of 14C-labeled linear maltodextrins of defined specific radioactivities prompted us to assay the initial rate of transport at identical substrate concentrations. We used strain ST103 lacking all maltodextrin-utilizing enzymes and thus accumulating these dextrins in their unmodified form (Fig. 2). The first set of experiments was done at 70 nM, well below the Km of the transporter for these substrates, and the second set was done at 10 µM under conditions near the maximum rate of uptake. Table 3 shows that, surprisingly, the initial rate of uptake stayed quite constant when it was calculated in glucosyl residues taken up per minute. Thus, even though the rate per mole of maltodextrin taken up per minute declined as the size increased, the rate per glucosyl residue stayed surprisingly constant. There was the possibility that the observed constant rate of uptake was not caused by the ABC transporter in the inner membrane but by the {lambda} receptor, the specific diffusion pore for maltodextrins in the outer membrane. Therefore, we transformed ST103, the test strain, with a multicopy-number plasmid harboring lamB encoding the {lambda} receptor. Transport of [14C]maltohexaose at 70 nM and 10 µM concentrations was the same with and without additional copies of the {lambda} receptor. Therefore, the constant initial rate of glucosyl residues of the tested maltodextrins was indeed a reflection of the properties of the maltodextrin ABC transporter.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. Rate of transport of maltodextrins

 
The capacity of malQ strains to accumulate maltose can reach 106-fold over the external concentration and a maximal internal concentration of 100 mM. To demonstrate the capacity of E. coli to accumulate maltose and to maintain the concentration gradient, uptake was tested in CB4, a malQ strain lacking maltose acetylase, the only remaining enzyme that is able to alter maltose (8). This enzyme slowly acetylates cytoplasmically accumulated maltose, which can then exit the cells via a non-carrier-mediated diffusion process (3). CB47 cells were exposed to various concentrations of external 14C-labeled maltose and were filtered after the equilibrium of accumulation had been reached. Filter-bound radioactivity as well as radioactivity in the filtrate were measured to determine the internal and external [14C]maltose concentrations. These results are summarized in Table 4. At the low external concentration of 1.8 nM, the accumulation was 106-fold. This ratio dropped as the external concentration was raised. It appears that the maximally attainable internal concentration is on the order of 100 mM. Since the exit of accumulated [14C]maltose could be initiated by the addition of 1 mM external unlabeled maltose (Fig. 3), it is clear that an exit system whose internal Km must be of the same order (100 mM) acts under these conditions. Strains lacking all maltodextrin enzymes become sensitive to maltodextrins (they cease to grow), in particular, to maltotriose when present in the growth medium in an excess of 50 µM, indicating that the accumulated sugar represents an osmotic, and possibly also an energetic, stress. The exit of [14C]maltose was made visible by blocking the entry with unlabeled maltose. When a plasmid encoding a general sugar exit system (35) was present in strain CB47, this exit reaction was increased and the final equilibrium concentration of accumulated internal maltose was lowered by a factor of more than 2 (Fig. 3). The presence of the plasmid-encoded exit pump had no effect on the initial rate of uptake of maltose at a low external concentration, but it relieved the toxicity of maltotriose in the growth medium apparently by lowering the internal dextrin concentration. Exit of maltose must be necessary for capping an unlimited accumulation of maltose. Thus, the entry and exit of maltose are mediated via different systems and the ABC transporter is exclusively geared for the unidirectional entry reaction.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 4. Equilibrium accumulation of maltose in a malQ strain (CB47) at different external maltose concentrationsa

 
Induction of the maltose system by inducer formation and by transport. The induction of the maltose system is controlled on one hand by the inducer maltotriose-activating MalT, the transcriptional activator of the system (49), and by MalK, the ATP-hydrolyzing ABC subunit of the transporter inactivating MalT (31). Even though highly suggestive, the effect of transport itself on induction (modulating the regulatory activity of MalK) has never been measured directly. Therefore, we measured induction by exogenous maltodextrins under two conditions. In the first set, we used strain MC4100, allowing uptake via the ABC transporter as well as metabolism of the dextrins (including internal maltotriose formation and degradation) by the three enzymes MalQ, MalP, and MalZ and final degradation by glycolysis. In the second set, we used strain RD33 lacking all three maltodextrin-metabolizing enzymes as well as glycogen. Under these conditions, maltotriose cannot be formed from the dextrins taken up nor can it be formed from the degradation of glycogen.

In the first set, strain MC4100 was grown in minimal medium with glycerol overnight and reinoculated in minimal medium in the absence of glycerol but in the presence of 0.2% of the different maltodextrins from maltose to maltoheptaose. After growth overnight, the capacity of these cells to transport maltose was taken as a measure for the induction of the maltose system (Table 5). In this comparison, maltotriose induced significantly better than the other maltodextrins even though the differences were not dramatic. The induction by the different maltodextrins seen under these conditions reflects the sum of both internal maltotriose levels as well as induction by transport. The conclusion from this set of experiments is that the internal maltotriose levels may not vary significantly in spite of different exogenous maltodextrins. The low transport activity in cultures grown on glycerol is an underestimate of the uninduced state since glycerol exerts catabolite repression on the maltose system (19). When measured after growth in minimal medium plus 0.4% CAA, a more realistic value (10-fold increased) of the uninduced state was obtained.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 5. Induction of the maltose transporter by maltodextrins in a wild-type strain (MC4100)

 
In the second set, by using strain RD33, which lacks MalQ, MalZ, and MalP, all internal metabolism of maltodextrins was abolished. Strain RD33 carries a glgA-lacZ fusion and can therefore no longer produce endogenously glycogen-derived maltotriose (18). In this strain, maltodextrins supplied from the medium are accumulated in a chemically unaltered form (as seen for a similar strain, ST103, in Fig. 2A). Thus, the formation of the inducer maltotriose does not contribute to induction. As a measure of mal gene expression, we again used the transport activity of maltose. The strain was grown overnight in MMA with 0.2% glycerol or with 0.4% CAA as the carbon source. As discussed above, such a strain is sensitive to maltodextrins when added in a concentration exceeding 50 µM. At an OD578 of 0.1, 10 µM concentrations of maltodextrins (from maltose to maltoheptaose) were added for induction (Table 6). The following conclusions can be drawn. All maltodextrins are able to induce the system, maltotriose being the most effective and maltose the least effective. Assuming that most of the dextrins in the medium (initial concentration, 10 µM) have accumulated in the outgrown culture, the maximal internal concentration is in the order of 1 mM. As judged by TLC analysis, the different maltodextrins used were homogeneous (not shown). Since they are not degraded inside the cells and since MalT in vitro is activated only by maltotriose (48), the induction seen under these conditions must be due to the transport of these sugars per se. Again, cells grown in glycerol have a much lower basal expression than cells grown in CAA. There is still the possibility that CAA may contain an inducing substance. Therefore, we compared the transport of maltose (70 nM) in RD33 cells grown on 0.2% glycerol with that in RD33 cells grown on 0.4% CAA and on 0.4% CAA plus 0.2% glycerol. The high uninduced rate of transport in CAA-grown cells (0.214 nmol per min per 109 cells) was repressed more than 10-fold in the additional presence of 0.2% glycerol during growth (0.012 nmol per min per 109 cells; the value with 0.2% glycerol alone is 0.025). This indicates that CAA does not contain an inducer but that glycerol represses mal gene expression.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 6. Induction by exogenous maltodextrins in a strain (RD33) lacking all maltodextrin enzymes

 

   DISCUSSION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
In this publication, we addressed two different aspects of the maltose/maltodextrin system of E. coli, i.e., its transport characteristics and the in vivo role of its enzymes. We synthesized uniformly 14C-labeled maltodextrins up to seven glucosyl units long, exhibiting defined and identical specific radioactivities with respect to their glucosyl units. The synthesis of these dextrins was accomplished by the action of amylomaltase on uniformely labeled [14C]maltose. In contrast to the proposal that amylomaltase cannot use maltose as a substrate (but as an acceptor), we found that purified [14C]maltose was easily transformed into maltodextrins and glucose. The enzyme preparation had been thoroughly dialyzed. Thus, if the enzyme indeed needs a maltodextrin larger than maltotriose, such a priming maltodextrin had to be tightly bound to it during dialysis. Or, alternatively, maltose can be recognized by amylomaltase as a substrate as well, producing increasingly better primers in the course of glucosyl transfer. In any case, we found the reaction catalyzed by amylomaltase to be a convenient and simple method to synthesize maltodextrins up to maltoheptaose of defined specific radioactivities.

Using these labeled maltodextrins in transport assays, we found that uptake through the maltose/maltodextrin ABC transporter at a substrate concentration of 70 nM (far below their transport Km) as well as at 10 µM (under Vmax conditions) takes place with surprisingly similar rates of transport with respect to each glucosyl unit. We interpret this finding by a ratchet-type transport mechanism in which the transport of each glucosyl unit represents a repetitive cycle for the transporter. Studies of growth rates using maltodextrins of differing lengths as carbon sources have shown that growth rates from maltose up to maltoheptaose remain similar and decline only with longer dextrins (63). With the assumption that transport limits growth, this is consistent with our observation that the rate of transport declines linearly in proportion to the increased size of the substrate or that the rate of uptake per glucosyl residue remains constant independent of the length of the dextrin. Studies reporting the growth yields for different sugars showed that the yields for maltose, maltotriose, and maltohexaose grown under anaerobic conditions were 37.5, 67.6, and 155 g per mol of substrate (42). Calculated per glucosyl residue, this comes to 18.7-, 22.5-, and 25.8-g growth yields per mol glucosyl residue, respectively. The higher growth yield achieved with maltohexaose has been interpreted by the equal-ATP requirement for transporting maltose versus maltohexaose. However, in this case, the gain in yield should have been considerably higher even if only one ATP is needed for transporting one dextrin molecule. Maltohexaose contains per glucosyl residue a higher nutritional value than maltose. This is due to the conservation of energy contained in the glycosidic linkage by the phosphorylase action saving one ATP per glycosidic bond. Thus, the yield per glucosyl residue being 18.7 g in the case of maltose should be one-third ATP (or 3.3 g) more for one glucosyl residue in maltotriose (22.0 g) and two-thirds ATP (or 6.6 g) more for the glucosyl residue in maltohexaose (24.9 g). This is very close to what has been found experimentally (42), arguing against the equal-ATP requirement for the accumulation of the different dextrin molecules and for the requirement for equal transported glucosyl residues within the dextrin molecule. Thus, we propose that the energy expenditure for the transport of one molecule of maltohexaose by the ABC transporter is three times the value for one molecule of maltose.

The availability of a strain being devoid of amylomaltase as well as maltose transacetylase in which maltose cannot be altered in the cytoplasm allowed us to reexamine (60) the relationship of internal and external maltose concentrations in the equilibrium state of accumulation where the rates of exit and entry become equal. At a 1.8 nM external concentration, a 106-fold accumulation was reached, resulting in an internal concentration of 1.89 mM. Increasing the external concentration reduced the concentration gradient but increased the internal concentration. The latter reaches (but does not greatly exceed) 100 mM. The limit of 100 mM internal maltose is maintained by one or more exit systems with a high Km for exit. Binding protein-dependent ABC transporters have traditionally been considered unidirectional pumps where the hydrolysis of ATP is directly coupled to the inward transport of substrate (4). This view has been challenged by a report claiming the exit of amino acids via a binding protein-dependent ABC transporter (30). In the maltose system, it has been demonstrated that [14C]maltose accumulated in a malQ mutant can be chased out by the addition of millimolar concentrations of external unlabeled maltose. Yet, uncouplers of oxidative phosphorylation strongly inhibit the exit of maltose but not the ABC transporter-mediated entry of maltose (23), demonstrating that entry and exit occur by two separate mechanisms. During the present study, we found that maltotriose was growth inhibitory for malQ strains growing on glycerol or CAA. We also found that the overexpression of yabM (35), a gene known to encode a sugar exit transporter, abolished the sensitivity against maltotriose in a malQ mutant and resulted in increased maltose exit (Fig. 3) without affecting the initial rate of entry. There is more than one sugar exit transporter (7) that could account for maltose exit. Thus, we would like to emphasize that maltose, when present at high internal concentrations, can be secreted by mediated processes exhibiting a very high Km value. Therefore, at present, there is no convincing evidence for maltose exit through the MalEFGK2 ABC transport complex.

Using mutants lacking malP (maltodextrin phosphorylase) or malZ (maltodextrin glucosidase) or both, we followed the fate of 14C-labeled maltodextrins after their accumulation in order to identify the role of MalP and MalZ in the metabolism of maltodextrins. To prevent the fast breakdown of the accumulated dextrins, we performed these studies in a mutant background lacking malQ. The conclusion of these studies (Fig. 2) was that maltodextrin phosphorylase will reduce the size of any maltodextrin to maltotetraose and, in a slow reaction, to maltotriose but not any further (17). Thus, MalP will ensure the formation of the inducer maltotriose from any longer linear maltodextrin, for instance, as those derived from glycogen break down. But MalP will not eliminate the inducer. In contrast to the inducer-producing role of MalP, MalZ, the maltodextrin glucosidase, will hydrolyze any maltodextrin, including maltotriose to maltose. Thus, MalZ will be expected to reduce glycogen-derived endogenous induction. We would like to emphasize that maltose is not recognized by either MalP or MalZ.

The availability of a mutant lacking glycogen and all maltodextrin enzymes (malQ, malP, malZ) preventing the degradation of the accumulated maltodextrins allowed us to test the proposal that transport itself influences induction. Following the ability to transport maltose as a measure of mal gene expression, we indeed found that maltotriose strongly induced the system; it was the best of all six dextrins tested. However, all other maltodextrins, including maltose, were able to induce the system. We interpret this result by the action of MalK during transport. In this scenario, MalK engaged in transport would relieve MalT from inhibition. Exit of maltodextrins may occur through sugar exit systems, allowing continuing reentry through the ABC transporter. The different levels of induction reached by the different sugars could be explained by their unequal rates of exit. The low inducing capability of maltose in this scheme would then also be due to its removal by maltose transacetylase (8). The longer dextrins are not substrates for this enzyme.

The observation that transport of maltodextrins alone in the apparent absence of internal maltotriose can elicit induction poses an inherent problem: the activity of MalT can be controlled (inhibited) by the interaction with MalK, representing transport-controlled induction. Yet, for its activation, MalT needs to bind inducer (49). Is there an alternative inducer aside from maltotriose? In the accompanying paper (17), where we discuss the osmoregulation of endogenous induction, we come to the conclusion that, aside from the glycogen-derived inducer maltotriose that is sensitive to MalZ, there exists glycogen-independent endogenous induction that is insensitive to MalZ and therefore must be caused by an inducer distinct from maltotriose that is able to activate MalT when MalK is not inhibiting MalT. This inducer must be inefficient for induction in the presence of a nontransporting (and therefore MalT-inhibiting) MalK, but it will reveal its MalT-activating capabilities either in the absence of MalK (see accompanying publication [17]) or during transport engagement.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We are grateful to Erika Oberer-Bley for her help in preparing and correcting the manuscript.

This research was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany. Phone: 49-7531-882658. Fax: 49-7531-883356. E-mail: Winfried.Boos{at}uni-konstanz.de. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Bavoil, P., M. Hofnung, and H. Nikaido. 1980. Identification of a cytoplasmic membrane-associated component of the maltose transport system of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 255:8366-8369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Böhm, A., J. Diez, K. Diederichs, W. Welte, and W. Boos. 2002. Structural model of MalK, the ABC subunit of the maltose transporter of Escherichia coli. Implications for mal gene regulation, inducer exclusion, and subunit assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 277:3708-3717.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Boos, W., T. Ferenci, and H. A. Shuman. 1981. Formation and excretion of acetylmaltose after accumulation of maltose in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 146:725-732.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Boos, W., and J. M. Lucht. 1996. Periplasmic binding protein-dependent ABC transporters, p. 1175-1209. In F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  5. Boos, W., and H. A. Shuman. 1998. The maltose/maltodextrin system of Escherichia coli: transport, metabolism, and regulation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:204-229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Boos, W., and A. Böhm. 2000. Learning new tricks from an old dog. MaIT of the Escherichia coli maltose system is part of a complex regulatory network. Trends Genet. 16:404-409.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Bost, S., F. Silva, and D. Belin. 1999. Transcriptional activation of ydeA, which encodes a member of the major facilitator superfamily, interferes with arabinose accumulation and induction of the Escherichia coli arabinose PBAD promoter. J. Bacteriol. 181:2185-2191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Brand, B., and W. Boos. 1991. Maltose transacetylase of Escherichia coli. Mapping and cloning of its structural gene, mac, and characterization of the enzyme as a dimer of identical polypeptides with a molecular weight of 20.000. J. Biol. Chem. 266:14113-14118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Casadaban, M. J. 1976. Transposition and fusion of the lac genes to selected promoters in Escherichia coli using bacteriophage lambda and Mu. J. Mol. Biol. 104:541-555.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Chapon, C. 1982. Expression of malT, the regulator gene of the maltose region in Escherichia coli, is limited both at transcription and translation. EMBO J. 1:369-374.[Medline]
  11. Chen, J., G. Lu, J. Lin, A. L. Davidson, and F. A. Quiocho. 2003. A tweezers-like motion of the ATP-binding cassette dimer in an ABC transport cycle. Mol. Cell 12:651-661.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Chen, J., S. Sharma, F. A. Quiocho, and A. L. Davidson. 2001. Trapping the transition state of an ATP-binding cassette transporter: evidence for a concerted mechanism of maltose transport. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:1525-1530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Dassa, E. 1990. Cellular localization of the MalG protein from the maltose transport system in Escherichia coli K12. Mol. Gen. Genet. 222:33-36.[Medline]
  14. Davidson, A. L. 2002. Mechanism of coupling of transport to hydrolysis in bacterial ATP-binding cassette transporters. J. Bacteriol. 184:1225-1233.[Free Full Text]
  15. Decker, K., R. Peist, J. Reidl, M. Kossmann, B. Brand, and W. Boos. 1993. Maltose and maltotriose can be formed endogenously in Escherichia coli from glucose and glucose-1-phosphate independently of enzymes of the maltose system. J. Bacteriol. 175:5655-5665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Decker, K., J. Plumbridge, and W. Boos. 1998. Negative transcriptional regulation of a positive regulator: the expression of malT, encoding the transcriptional activator of the maltose regulon of Escherichia coli, is negatively controlled by Mlc. Mol. Microbiol. 27:381-390.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Dippel, R., T. Bergmiller, A. Böhm, and W. Boos. 2005. The maltodextrin system of Escherichia coli: glycogen-derived endogenous induction and osmoregulation. J. Bacteriol. 187:8332-8339.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ehrmann, M., and W. Boos. 1987. Identification of endogenous inducers of the mal system in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 169:3539-3545.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Eppler, T., and W. Boos. 1999. Glycerol-3-phosphate-mediated repression of malT in Escherichia coli does not require metabolism, depends on enzyme IIAGlc and is mediated by cAMP levels. Mol. Microbiol. 33:1221-1231.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Eppler, T., P. Postma, A. Schütz, U. Völker, and W. Boos. 2002. Glycerol-3-phosphate-induced catabolite repression in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 184:3044-3052.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ferenci, T. 1980. Methyl-{alpha}-maltoside and 5-thiomaltose: analogs transported by the Escherichia coli maltose transport system. J. Bacteriol. 144:7-11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Ferenci, T. 1980. The recognition of maltodextrins by Escherichia coli. Eur. J. Biochem. 108:631-636.[Medline]
  23. Ferenci, T., W. Boos, M. Schwartz, and S. Szmelcman. 1977. Energy-coupling of the transport system of Escherichia coli dependent on maltose-binding protein. Eur. J. Biochem. 75:187-193.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Ferenci, T., and U. Klotz. 1978. Affinity chromatographic isolation of the periplasmic maltose binding protein. FEBS Lett. 94:213-217.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Ferenci, T., M. Muir, K.-S. Lee, and D. Maris. 1986. Substrate specificity of the Escherichia coli maltodextrin transport system and its component proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 860:44-50.[Medline]
  26. Freundlieb, S., and W. Boos. 1986. {alpha}-Amylase of Escherichia coli, mapping and cloning of the structural gene, malS, and identification of its product as a periplasmic protein. J. Biol. Chem. 261:2946-2953.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Freundlieb, S., U. Ehmann, and W. Boos. 1988. Facilitated diffusion of p-nitrophenyl-{alpha}-D-maltohexaoside through the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 263:314-320.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Froshauer, S., G. N. Green, D. Boyd, K. McGovern, and J. Beckwith. 1988. Genetic analysis of the membrane insertion and topology of MalF, a cytoplasmic membrane protein of Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 200:501-511.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Gardner, K. H., X. Zhang, K. Gehring, and L. E. Kay. 1998. Solution NMR studies of a 42 KDa Escherichia coli maltose binding protein/ß-cyclodextrin complex: chemical shift assignments and analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120:11738-11748.[CrossRef]
  30. Hosie, A. H. F., D. Allaway, M. A. Jones, D. L. Walshaw, A. W. B. Johnston, and P. S. Poole. 2001. Solute-binding protein-dependent ABC transporters are responsible for solute efflux in addition to solute uptake. Mol. Microbiol. 40:1449-1459.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Joly, N., A. Bohm, W. Boos, and E. Richet. 2004. MalK, the ATP-binding cassette component of the Escherichia coli maltodextrin transporter, inhibits the transcriptional activator MalT by antagonizing inducer binding. J. Biol. Chem. 279:33123-33130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Kellermann, O., and S. Szmelcman. 1974. Active transport of maltose in Escherichia coli K12. Involvement of a "periplasmic" maltose binding protein. Eur. J. Biochem. 47:139-149.[Medline]
  33. Kühnau, S., M. Reyes, A. Sievertsen, H. A. Shuman, and W. Boos. 1991. The activities of the Escherichia coli MalK protein in maltose transport, regulation, and inducer exclusion can be separated by mutations. J. Bacteriol. 173:2180-2186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Lee, S.-J., W. Boos, J.-P. Bouché, and J. Plumbridge. 2000. Signal transduction between a membrane bound transporter, PtsG, and a soluble transcription factor, Mlc, of Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 19:5353-5361.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Liu, J. Y., P. F. Miller, M. Gosink, and E. R. Olson. 1999. The identification of a new family of sugar efflux pumps in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 31:1845-1851.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Liu, J. Y., P. F. Miller, J. Willard, and E. R. Olson. 1999. Functional and biochemical characterization of Escherichia coli sugar efflux transporters. J. Biol. Chem. 274:22977-22984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Miller, J. H. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  38. Mimmack, M. L., M. P. Gallagher, S. R. Pearce, S. C. Hyde, I. R. Booth, and C. F. Higgins. 1989. Energy coupling to periplasmic binding protein-dependent transport systems: stoichiometry of ATP hydrolysis during transport in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:8257-8261.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Monod, J., and A. M. Torriani. 1950. De l'amylomaltase d'Escherichia coli. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 78:65-77.[Medline]
  40. Morbach, S., S. Tebbe, and E. Schneider. 1993. The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter for maltose/maltodextrins of Salmonella typhimurium. Characterization of the ATPase activity associated with the purified MalK subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 268:18617-18621.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Mourez, M., M. Hofnung, and E. Dassa. 1997. Subunit interactions in ABC transporters: a conserved sequence in hydrophobic membrane proteins of periplasmic permeases defines an important site of interaction with the ATPase subunits. EMBO J. 16:3066-3077.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Muir, M., L. Williams, and T. Ferenci. 1985. Influence of transport energization on the growth yield of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 163:1237-1242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Pajatsch, M., A. Böck, and W. Boos. 1998. Enzymatic preparation of radiolabeled linear maltodextrins and cyclodextrins of high specific activity from [14C]-maltose using amylomaltase, cyclodextrin glucosyltransferase, and cyclodextrinase. Carbohydr. Res. 307:375-378.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Palmer, N. T., B. E. Ryman, and W. J. Whelan. 1976. The action pattern of amylomaltase from Escherichia coli. Eur. J. Biochem. 69:105-115.[Medline]
  45. Peist, H., C. Schneider-Fresenius, and W. Boos. 1996. The MalT-dependent and malZ-encoded maltodextrin glucosidase of Escherichia coli can be converted into a dextrinyltransferase by a single mutation. J. Biol. Chem. 271:10681-10689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Postma, P. W., J. W. Lengeler, and G. R. Jacobson. 1996. Phosphoenolpyruvate:carbohydrate phosphotransferase system, p. 1149-1174. In F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  47. Pugsley, A. P., and C. Dubreuil. 1988. Molecular characterization of malQ, the structural gene for the Escherichia coli enzyme amylomaltase. Mol. Microbiol. 2:473-479.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Raha, M., I. Kawagishi, V. Müller, M. Kihara, and R. M. Macnab. 1992. Escherichia coli produces a cytoplasmic {alpha}-amylase, AmyA. J. Bacteriol. 174:6644-6652.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Raibaud, O., and E. Richet. 1987. Maltotriose is the inducer of the maltose regulon. J. Bacteriol. 169:3059-3061.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Raibaud, O., D. Vidal-Ingigliardi, and E. Richet. 1989. A complex nucleoprotein structure involved in activation of transcription of two divergent Escherichia coli promoters. J. Mol. Biol. 205:471-485.[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Randall-Hazelbauer, L., and M. Schwartz. 1973. Isolation of the bacteriophage lambda receptor from Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 116:1436-1446.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Reyes, M., N. A. Treptow, and H. A. Shuman. 1986. Transport of p-nitrophenyl-{alpha}-maltoside by the maltose transport system of Escherichia coli and its subsequent hydrolysis by a cytoplasmic maltosidase. J. Bacteriol. 165:918-922.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Schirmer, T., T. A. Keller, Y. F. Wang, and J. P. Rosenbusch. 1995. Structural basis for sugar translocation through maltoporin channels at 3.1 Å resolution. Science 267:512-514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Schneider, E., S. Freundlieb, S. Tapio, and W. Boos. 1992. Molecular characterization of the MalT-dependent periplasmic {alpha}-amylase of Escherichia coli encoded by malS. J. Biol. Chem. 267:5148-5154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Schwartz, M. 1987. The maltose regulon, p. 1482-1502. In F. C. Neidhardt (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: cellular and molecular biology, vol. 2. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  56. Schwartz, M., and M. Hofnung. 1967. La maltodextrin phosphorylase d'Escherichia coli. Eur. J. Biochem. 2:132-145.[Medline]
  57. Shilton, B. H., M. M. Flocco, M. Nilsson, and S. L. Mowbray. 1996. Conformational changes of three periplasmic receptors for bacterial chemotaxis and transport: the maltose-, glucose/galactose- and ribose-binding proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 264:350-363.[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Shuman, H. A., and T. J. Silhavy. 1981. Identification of the malK gene product. A peripheral membrane component of the Escherichia coli maltose transport system. J. Biol. Chem. 256:560-562.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Spurlino, J. C., G.-Y. Lu, and F. A. Quiocho. 1991. The 2.3-Å resolution structure of the maltose- or maltodextrin-binding protein, a primary receptor of bacterial active transport and chemotaxis. J. Biol. Chem. 266:5202-5219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Szmelcman, S., M. Schwartz, T. J. Silhavy, and W. Boos. 1976. Maltose transport in Escherichia coli K12. A comparison of transport kinetics inwild-type and {lambda}-resistant mutants with the dissociation constants of the maltose binding protein as measured by fluorescence quenching. Eur. J. Biochem. 65:13-19.[Medline]
  61. Tapio, S., F. Yeh, H. A. Shuman, and W. Boos. 1991. The malZ gene of Escherichia coli, a member of the maltose regulon, encodes a maltodextrin glucosidase. J. Biol. Chem. 266:19450-19458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Thieme, R., H. Lay, A. Oser, J. Lehmann, S. Wrissenberg, and W. Boos. 1986. 3-Azi-1-methoxybutyl D-maltooligosaccharides specifically bind to the maltose/maltooligosaccharide-binding protein of Escherichia coli and can be used as photoaffinity labels. Eur. J. Biochem. 160:83-91.[Medline]
  63. Wandersman, C., M. Schwartz, and T. Ferenci. 1979. Escherichia coli mutants impaired in maltodextrin transport. J. Bacteriol. 140:1-13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Watson, K. A., R. Schinzel, D. Palm, and L. N. Johnson. 1997. The crystal structure of Escherichia coli maltodextrin phosphorylase provides an explanation for the activity without control in this basic archetype of a phosphorylase. EMBO J. 16:1-14.[CrossRef][Medline]
  65. Wiesmeyer, H., and M. Cohn. 1960. The characterization of the pathway of maltose utilization by Escherichia coli. I. Purification and physical chemical properties of the enzyme amylomaltase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 39:417-426.[Medline]
  66. Wiesmeyer, H., and M. Cohn. 1960. The characterization of the pathway of maltose utilization by Escherichia coli. II. General properties and mechanism of action of amylomaltase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 39:427-439.[Medline]

Journal of Bacteriology, December 2005, p. 8322-8331, Vol. 187, No. 24
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.187.24.8322-8331.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information