Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Robinson, J. L. Articles by Shand, R. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Robinson, J. L. Articles by Shand, R. F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, February 2005, p. 923-929, Vol. 187, No. 3
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.187.3.923-929.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Growth Kinetics of Extremely Halophilic Archaea (Family Halobacteriaceae) as Revealed by Arrhenius Plots

Jessie L. Robinson,¹ Brandy Pyzyna,¹ Rachelle G. Atrasz,¹ Christine A. Henderson,¹ Kira L. Morrill,¹ Anna Mae Burd,¹ Erik DeSoucy,¹ Rex E. Fogleman III,¹ John B. Naylor,¹ Sarah M. Steele,¹ Dawn R. Elliott,¹ Kathryn J. Leyva,² and Richard F. Shand^1*

Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff,¹ Department of Microbiology, Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, Arizona²

Received 22 August 2004/ Accepted 31 October 2004

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion References

 
Members of the family Halobacteriaceae in the domain Archaea are obligate extreme halophiles. They occupy a variety of hypersaline environments, and their cellular biochemistry functions in a nearly saturated salty milieu. Despite extensive study, a detailed analysis of their growth kinetics is missing. To remedy this, Arrhenius plots for 14 type species of the family were generated. These organisms had maximum growth temperatures ranging from 49 to 58°C. Nine of the organisms exhibited a single temperature optimum, while five grew optimally at more than one temperature. Generation times at these optimal temperatures ranged from 1.5 h (Haloterrigena turkmenica) to 3.0 h (Haloarcula vallismortis and Halorubrum saccharovorum). All shared an inflection point at 31 ± 4°C, and the temperature characteristics for 12 of the 14 type species were nearly parallel. The other two species (Natronomonas pharaonis and Natronorubrum bangense) had significantly different temperature characteristics, suggesting that the physiology of these strains is different. In addition, these data show that the type species for the family Halobacteriaceae share similar growth kinetics and are capable of much faster growth at higher temperatures than those previously reported.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion References

 
The family Halobacteriaceae in the domain Archaea presently is comprised of 18 genera and 49 validly described species (International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes [http://www.the-icsp.org]). All members are extreme halophiles, requiring at least 1.5 M NaCl for growth, but grow optimally in 2.0 to 4.5 M NaCl (6, 20). All have exceptionally high internal cation concentrations that approach 6 M in some species (e.g., Halobacterium salinarum) (21). In addition to exhibiting halophilicity, four genera (Natronococcus, Natronomonas, Natronorubrum, and Natronobacterium) are also alkaliphilic, growing optimally between pH 9.5 and 10.0 (20). These organisms have been isolated from a wide variety of environments, including the sediment of a cold, hypersaline lake in Antarctica (Halorubrum lacusprofundi) (3), the Dead Sea (Haloferax volcanii) (16), the Great Salt Lake (Halorabdus utahensis) (31), a hypersaline soda lake in Egypt (Natronomonas pharaonis) (27), and a salt crystal from a Permian halite deposit (Halosimplex carlsbadense) (30). There is also a report of haloarchaeal 16S rDNA amplified from inside a black smoker (28), but no haloarchaeons have been cultured from this source. All haloarchaea grow aerobically, and one species (Halobacterium salinarum) can grow phototrophically using bacteriorhodopsin as a light-driven proton pump (19).

Since "...growth is the core of bacterial physiology..." (11) and since all experiments in cellular regulation are fundamentally physiological, it is essential to understand the growth physiology of the organism one is studying. Toward this goal we generated a complete Arrhenius plot for the haloarchaeon Haloferax mediterranei (22, 25; J. L. Robinson and R. F. Shand, unpublished data [http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/shand]). This growth physiology experiment revealed the following: (i) the organism is eurythermal, growing between 12 and 55°C with generation times of 752.5 and 1.67 h, respectively, (ii) it has an optimal temperature plateau (from 47 to 51°C; g_avg = 1.20 ± 0.01 h, where g_avg represents average generation time) instead of a single optimum temperature, and (iii) it has an inflection point (i.e., a deviation from the Arrhenius portion of the plot) at 33°C. We also discovered that all physiologically based experiments involving this organism have been conducted under suboptimal growth temperatures. The first (and only other) correlation between growth rate and temperature for a haloarchaeon was produced for Halorubrum lacusprofundi (3) by use of a temperature gradient incubator. Unfortunately, balanced growth conditions were not established and optical density readings at the higher growth temperatures were confounded by flocculent growth.

Extremely halophilic Archaea possess eukaryote-like features such as multisubunit RNA polymerases, homologues to eukaryotic transcription factors, TATA-box promoters (18, 29), and leaderless transcripts (4); these features make them distinct from Bacteria at the molecular level. Moreover, given the diversity of environments from which the haloarchaea are isolated and the lack of detailed information regarding their growth physiology, we generated Arrhenius plots for 14 type species. These data provide critical information for elucidating their physiological, metabolic, and genetic features.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion References

 
Haloarchaeal strains, media and growth conditions. The type species and the appropriate medium for each are listed in Table 1. At the start of this project there were 14 genera (20); since then, four new genera (Halorhabdus, Halomicrobium, Halobiforma, and Halosimplex [http://www.the-icsp.org]) have been added to the family and are not represented in this study. Cultures were grown at 200 rpm in model G76 and C76 orbital shaking water baths (New Brunswick Scientific Co. Inc., Edison, N.J.) with gabled covers (essential for reducing evaporation). Temperature was monitored with ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) thermometers accurate to ±0.2°C. To promote efficient aeration, 125-ml tribaffled flasks (Kimble Glass, Vineland, N.J.) with Morton-type closures containing 25 ml of medium were used. Growth was monitored spectrophotometrically using a dual-beam BioSpec 1601 (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc., Columbia, Md.). All samples with an optical density at 600 nanometers (OD₆₀₀) >0.10 were diluted to an OD₆₀₀ between 0.05 and 0.10 before reading. To mitigate volume effects (especially in cultures with slow growth rates), no more than 15 ml of culture was removed from the culture flask. A survey of growth media at 41°C for Haloarcula vallismortis, Halococcus morrhuae, and Natrinema pellirubrum included ATCC 1863, GN101, and NRC817, in addition to the recommended medium (see Table 1 and Table 2) (8).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Strains, media, and sources

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Growth medium survey

Criteria for establishing balanced growth and determining generation times. Prior to collection of Arrhenius plot data, cultures were placed into balanced growth (1): a minimum of eight generations in exponential phase (at least two subcultures). To ensure they remained in balanced growth, the cultures were grown from an OD₆₀₀ of 0.01 to an OD₆₀₀ of no more than 0.20 (4.5 doublings). The starting temperature for each Arrhenius plot was 41°C. Once in balanced growth, the 41°C cultures were subcultured bidirectionally into aerated media in 2°C increments; balanced growth was then reestablished. This was repeated until both the maximum temperature and 23°C were reached. Due to the prolonged generation times at lower temperatures, it was impractical to grow these organisms below 23°C (3, 22).

Minimum requirements for growth curves from which generation times were determined were as follows: (i) samples were taken at least once every generation, (ii) each growth curve had a minimum of six time points, (iii) R² was 0.995, and (iv) the generation times of the last two growth curves differed by 20%. Typically, it took one or two growth curves after balanced growth had been established to meet these criteria; however, in some cases it took as many as 10. An organism was considered not able to grow when the OD₆₀₀ remained 0.03 and no growth occurred for 48 h.

Statistical analysis. A Student t test was used to determine whether differences in temperature characteristics were significant (see Fig. 2). Since the correlation coefficients were remarkably high (R² 0.984) (see Table 3), the within-group variance was negligible. Therefore, the slopes were compared.

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Comparison of the temperature characteristics of the 14 type species of Halobacteriaceae listed in Table 1. , Natronomonas pharaonis; , Natronorubrum bangense; ----, temperature characteristics of the other 12 type species (see Fig. 1 and Table 3 for details).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 3. Summary of the growth physiology of 14 type species of haloarchaea

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion References

 
Methodological rationale. Cultures were shifted from one temperature to another in 2°C increments to prevent long lags in growth and a heat shock or cold shock response. Heat shock genes are essential for growing cells, and "[i]nduction of the heat shock proteins during pre-adaptation at moderate temperatures increases survival of the organism at higher temperatures" (14).

The necessity for placing cultures into balanced growth prior to collecting data has been stated by Neidhardt et al. (17): "Unless growth is monitored throughout a physiological experiment, the results may not be reproducible... . In fact, a physiological experiment done with a poorly characterized culture is all but useless." We have shown that the growth rate of Halobacterium salinarum NRC817 decreases from its initial growth rate as early as OD₆₀₀ = 0.1 (25). However, this is an extreme example, and all organisms examined in this study grew linearly to an OD₆₀₀ of >0.2. Consequently, an OD₆₀₀ of 0.2 was chosen as a conservative maximum at which to subculture in order to maintain balanced growth. This had the additional benefits of (i) preventing spectrophotometric interference due to accumulation of gas vesicles (26) and (ii) preventing physiological perturbations due to decreased oxygen availability at higher temperatures (5) and pH changes in media that were relatively unbuffered.

In context of microbial physiology, an Arrhenius plot takes the form shown in Fig. 1D.The linear portion of the plot where growth rate correlates with temperature is called the Arrhenius, physiological, or "normal" portion, and the slope of this portion is called the temperature characteristic (11). Traditionally, temperature is plotted as 1,000/T (in degrees Kelvin) (9), however, we have converted to the more familiar degrees Celsius. The log of the specific growth rate constant (k = 0.693/g) is plotted on the abscissa.

View larger version (73K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Arrhenius plots for 14 type species of the family Halobacteriaceae (k = 0.693/g). — · —, regression line for the Arrhenius portion; · · · · , extrapolation toward minimum growth temperature. (D) a, maximum temperature; b, optimum temperature; c, temperature at the inflection point; AP, Arrhenius portion.

Growth medium survey. Although we used published medium recipes for growing the organisms, we found that three species grew poorly (g > 8 h) in the recommended medium. For these organisms a survey was done to determine whether some other medium would be better at supporting growth (see Materials and Methods). Table 2 shows that all three of these strains grew faster (g 4.1 h) in a medium other than that usually associated with these organisms, and these media were used in this study.

Growth kinetics. Fig. 1 shows the Arrhenius plots for 14 type species of the family Halobacteriaceae. Nine species had higher temperature optima than those previously reported (the largest difference was for Natronobacterium gregoryi [10°C]), two were equal to those previously reported, two were lower (by 2 to 5°C) than those previously reported, and one had no previously reported temperature optimum (Table 3). Generation times at optimal growth temperatures were not reported for any of the original descriptions of the 14 type species, but in this study, six were <2 h and eight were 3 h. Like Haloferax mediterranei, five of the organisms (Haloarcula vallismortis, Halobacterium salinarum, Halobaculum gomorrense, Halogeometricum borinquense, and Natronomonas pharaonis) (Table 3) had optimal temperature plateaus spanning 2 to 7°C. This is atypical, as most organisms have a single temperature optimum (see references 2, 7, and 15 for examples). Four strains (Halobacterium salinarum, Halococcus morrhuae, Natrialba asiatica, and Natronococcus occultus) had reported growth temperature optima spanning 5°C to (a remarkable) 15°C, but this study revealed that only one of those strains (Halobacterium salinarum) grew equally well at more than one temperature.

The maximum temperatures for growth were 49°C (Table 3). This thermotolerance reflects, in part, the high temperatures (45 to 50°C) (24) of the environments from which these organisms often are isolated. In contrast, Halorubrum lacusprofundi ACAM34, isolated from Deep Lake in Antarctica, is not a psychrophilic haloarchaeon, as its temperature optimum and maximum are 36 and 42°C, respectively (3); note that this represents results obtained with a sample from a hypersaline lake whose temperature is <0°C for 8 months of the year. For 10 of the 14 species, the temperature maximum was within 4 to 7°C of the temperature optimum, with one species (Halobacterium salinarum) having the same temperature (50°C) for both (Fig. 1, Table 3). These two cardinal temperatures typically are not far apart due to thermal denaturation of proteins which sets the maximum temperature for growth. In contrast, three species (Natronococcus occultus, Halorubrum saccharovorum, and Natronomonas pharaonis) had much greater differences between their optimum and maximum temperatures (9, 10, and 11°C, respectively) and gave results that do not conform to the typical growth-temperature profile. There is little correlation between the difference in maximum and optimum temperatures and the difference in generation times. For example, both Haloarcula vallismortis and Haloterrigena turkmenica have a 6°C difference between their maximum and optimum temperatures; however, the difference in generation times is 15.4 h for Haloarcula vallismortis but is only 1.45 h for Haloterrigena turkmenica (Table 3).

Haloarchaeal growth at the lower temperatures departs from the Arrhenius portion at a nearly uniform 31 ± 4°C and is linear between the inflection point and 23°C. This same departure is seen with psychrophiles, mesophiles, and thermophiles (2, 7, 9, 15), but the inflection point is shifted in response to the overall growth profile. For example, the inflection point is 10°C for Vibrio psychroerythrus (15), 21°C for Escherichia coli (9), about 31°C for haloarchaea (Table 3 and Fig. 2), and 53°C for Bacillus stearothermophilus (15). This represents a fundamental change in the physiology of the organism at these temperatures (10), and just as with E. coli, a new suite of cold-shock proteins presumably is synthesized (9, 10).

Uniformity of the Arrhenius portion. Fig. 2 shows the relationships of the 14 temperature characteristics. In every case, the relationship is linear (R² 0.984) (Table 3) and spans as much as 22°C (for Haloterrigena turkmenica, 29 to 51°C) and as little as 12°C (for Halobaculum gomorrense, 31 to 43°C). Remarkably, the temperature characteristics of 12 of the 14 species are nearly parallel (Fig. 2 and Table 3), with the slope ranging between 0.027 and 0.034, a difference of only 0.007. The temperature characteristic for Haloferax mediterranei (slope = 0.033) also falls within this group (data not shown). The two notable exceptions are haloalkaliphiles, Natronomonas pharaonis and Natronorubrum bangense (Fig. 2 and Table 3). The difference in the temperature characteristics for these two species from the results obtained with the other 12 is statistically significant (P 0.001) and suggests that the physiology of these two organisms is fundamentally different. While alkaliphilicity might be a contributing factor, the other two haloalkaliphiles (Natronobacterium gregoryi and Natronococcus occultus) group with the 10 neutrophiles. For comparison, we determined the temperature characteristics for Halorubrum lacusprofundi (slope = 0.040; R² = 0.943) and E. coli (slope = 0.032; R² = 0.981) from published data (3, 9). The temperature characteristic for Halorubrum lacusprofundi was significantly different (P 0.001) from those of the 12 haloarchaeons, but, interestingly, that of E. coli was not.

Significance. The heavy lifting has been done with respect to determining optimum growth temperatures for several species in the family Halobacteriaceae. Optimization experiments for any other parameter can now be done in a single water bath. Although we did not conduct an extensive survey to determine whether other species would grow better in a medium different than that recommended, we suspect that for many of the organisms listed in Table 1 there are media that will yield faster generation times.

The prevailing view is that the haloarchaea "...have relatively long generation times (e.g., 3 to 4 h for Haloferax volcanii; 8 to 12 h for Halobacterium spp.)" (Halohandbook [http://www.microbiol.unimelb.edu.au/micro/staff/mds/HaloHandbook]; see also references 12 and 13). However, under optimal growth temperatures, these organisms grow much faster than has been assumed; Haloferax volcanii DS70 and Halobacterium salinarum NRC-1 have generation times of 1.83 and 1.86 h, respectively (Table 3). Consequently, growth at optimal temperatures significantly reduces generation times.

As a group, populations of these organisms double in 1.5 to 3.0 h; however, some researchers recommend that haloarchaeons be grown below optimum temperatures (between 37 and 42°C) (23). This recommendation was made in part for convenience but also for concern about oxygen solubility in high salt. While oxygen solubility might be an issue at temperatures near the maximum, practical steps for enhancing oxygen diffusion at optimal temperatures (e.g., the use of baffled culture flasks) have been described previously (25).

In addition to cardinal growth temperature and generation time results, careful growth studies can reveal much about the physiology of an organism. The temperature characteristics for Halorubrum lacusprofundi, Natronomonas pharaonis, and Natronorubrum bangense suggest there is something fundamentally different about their physiology that deserves further study.

 
This work was supported by Public Health Service grant GM05600-02 from the National Institutes of Health and a grant from the Arizona Board of Regents' Technology and Research Initiative Funds (Proposition 301) to R.F.S. K.J.L. was supported through Intramural Grants from Midwestern University.

We thank Chuck Daniels, Shil DasSarma, Peter Jablonski, Carol Litchfield, and Russ Vreeland for supplying strains and Stephen Shuster for help with statistical analysis.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5640. Phone: (928) 523-9970. Fax: (928) 523-7500. E-mail: Richard.Shand{at}nau.edu.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion References

 

1
1. Campbell, A. 1957. Synchronization of cell division. Bacteriol. Rev. 21:263-272.[Free Full Text]
2
2. Chablain, P. A., G. Philippe, A. Groboillot, N. Truffaut, and J. F. Guespin-Michel. 1997. Isolation of a soil psychrotrophic toluene-degrading Pseudomonas strain: influence of temperature on the growth characteristics on different substrates. Res. Microbiol. 148:153-161.[Medline]
3
3. Franzmann, P. D., E. Stackebrandt, K. Sanderson, J. K. Volkman, D. E. Cameron, P. L. Stevenson, T. A. McKeen, and H. R. Burton. 1988. Halobacterium lacusprofundi sp. nov., a halophilic bacterium isolate from Deep Lake, Antarctica. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 11:20-27.
4
4. Fuglsang, A. 2004. Compositional nonrandomness upstream of start codons in archaebacteria. Gene 332:89-95.[CrossRef][Medline]
5
5. Gary, K. 1989. On-line electrochemical sensors in fermentation. Am. Biotechnol. Lab. 7:26-33.
6
6. Grant, W. D., and H. Larsen. 1989. Family Halobacteriaceae Gibbons 1974, 269^AL, p. 2218-2232. In J. T. Stanley, M. P. Bryant, N. Pfennig, and J. G. Holt (ed.), Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, vol. 3. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Md.
7
7. Guillou, C., and J. F. Guespin-Michel. 1996. Evidence for two domains of growth temperature for the psychrotrophic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens MF0. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:3319-3324.[Abstract]
8
8. Haseltine, C., T. Hill, R. Montalvo-Rodriguez, S. K. Kemper, R. F. Shand, and P. Blum. 2001. Secreted euryarchaeal microhalocins kill hyperthermophilic crenarchaea. J. Bacteriol. 183:287-291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Herendeen, S. L., R. A. VanBogelen, and F. C. Neidhardt. 1979. Levels of major proteins of Escherichia coli during growth at different temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 139:185-194.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10
10. Ingraham, J. L., and A. G. Marr. 1996. Effect of temperature, pressure, pH, and osmotic stress on growth, p. 1570-1578. In F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 2. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
11
11. Ingraham, J. L., O. Maaløe, and F. C. Neidhardt. 1983. Growth of the bacterial cell, p. ix, 227-265. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass.
12
12. Juez, G. 1988. Taxonomy of extremely halophilic archaebacteria, p. 3-24. In F. Rodriguez-Valera (ed.), Halophilic bacteria, vol. II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
13
13. Kushner, D. J. 1993. Growth and nutrition of halophilic bacteria, p. 87-103. In R. H. Vreeland and L. I. Hochstein (ed.), The biology of halophilic bacteria. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
14
14. Lengeler, J. W., G. Drews, and H. G. Schlegel (ed.). 1999. Biology of the prokaryotes, p. 658-660. Thieme, Stuttgart, Germany.
15
15. Mohr, P. W., and S. Krawiec. 1980. Temperature characteristics and Arrhenius plots for nominal psychrophiles, mesophiles and thermophiles. J. Gen. Microbiol. 121:311-317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
16. Mullakhanbhai, M. F., and H. Larsen. 1975. Halobacterium volcanii spec. nov., a Dead Sea halobacterium with a moderate salt requirement. Arch. Microbiol. 104:201-214.[CrossRef][Medline]
17
17. Neidhardt, F. C., J. L. Ingraham, and M. Schaechter. 1990. Physiology of the bacterial cell, p. 216, 227-229. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass.
18
18. Ng, W. V., S. P. Kennedy, G. G. Mahairas, B. Berquist, M. Pan, H. D. Shukla, S. R. Lasky, N. S. Baliga, V. Thorsson, J. Sbrogna, S. Swartzell, D. Weir, J. Hall, T. A. Dahl, R. Welti, Y. A. Goo, B. Leithauser, K. Keller, R. Cruz, M. J. Danson, D. W. Hough, D. G. Maddocks, P. E. Jablonski, M. P. Krebs, C. M. Angevine, H. Dale, T. A. Isenbarger, R. F. Peck, M. Pohlschroder, J. L. Spudich, K. H. Jung, M. Alum, T. Freitas, S. Hou, C. J. Daniels, P. P. Dennis, A. D. Omer, H. Ebhardt, T. M. Lowe, P. Liang, M. Riley, L. Hood, and S. DasSarma. 2000. Genome sequence of Halobacterium species NRC-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:12176-12181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19
19. Oesterhelt, D., and G. Krippahl. 1983. Phototrophic growth of halobacteria and its use for isolation of photosynthetically-deficient mutants. Ann. Inst. Pasteur Microbiol. 134B:137-150.
20
20. Oren. A. 2001. The order Halobacteriales, p. 2, 6-19. In M. Dworkin, S. Falkow, E. Rosenberg, K.-H. Schleifer, and E. Stackebrandt (ed.), The prokaryotes. A handbook on the biology of bacteria: ecophysiology, isolation, identification, applications, 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y. [Online.]
21
21. Oren, A. 2002. Halophilic microorganisms and their environments, p. 211. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
22
22. Perez, A. M. 2000. Growth physiology of Haloferax mediterranei R4 and purification of halocin H4. M.S. thesis. Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Ariz.
23
23. Rodriguez-Valera, F. 1995. Cultivation of halophilic archaea, p. 13-16. In F. T. Robb, A. R. Place, K. R. Sowers, H. J. Schreier, S. DasSarma, and E. M. Fleishmann (ed.), Archaea, a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.
24
24. Rodriguez-Valera, F. 1993. Introduction to saline environments, p. 1-23. In R. H. Vreeland and L. I. Hochstein (ed.), The biology of halophilic bacteria. CRC Press, Boca Raton. Fla.
25
25. Shand, R. F., and A. M. Perez. 1999. Haloarchaeal growth kinetics, p. 411-424. In J. Seckbach (ed.), Enigmatic microorganisms and life in extreme environments. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
26
26. Shand, R. F., and M. C. Betlach. 1991. Expression of the bop gene cluster of Halobacterium halobium is induced by low oxygen tension and by light. J. Bacteriol. 173:4692-4699.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27
27. Soliman, G. S. H., and H. G. Trüper. 1982. Halobacterium pharaonis sp. nov., a new, extremely haloalkaliphilic archaebacterium with low magnesium requirement. Zentbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. 1 Orig. 3:318-329.
28
28. Takai, K., T. Komatsu, F. Inagaki, and K. Horikoshi. 2001. Distribution of archaea in a black smoker chimney structure. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 67:3618-3629.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29
29. Thompson, D. K., J. R. Palmer, and C. J. Daniels. 1999. Expression and heat-responsive regulation of a TFIIB homologue for the archaeon Haloferax volcanii. Mol. Microbiol. 33:1081-1092.[CrossRef][Medline]
30
30. Vreeland, R. H., S. Straight, J. Krammes, K. Dougherty, W. D. Rosenzweig, and M. Kamekura. 2002. Halosimplex carlsbadense gen. nov., sp. nov., a unique halophilic archaeon, with three 16S rRNA genes, that grows only in defined medium with glycerol and acetate or pyruvate. Extremophiles 6:445-452.[CrossRef][Medline]
31
31. Waino, M., B. J. Tindall, and K. Ingvosen. 2000. Halorhabdus utahensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an aerobic, extremely halophilic member of the Archaea from Great Salt Lake, Utah. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50:183-190.[Abstract]

---

Journal of Bacteriology, February 2005, p. 923-929, Vol. 187, No. 3
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.187.3.923-929.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Humbard, M. A., Zhou, G., Maupin-Furlow, J. A. (2009). The N-Terminal Penultimate Residue of 20S Proteasome {alpha}1 Influences its N{alpha} Acetylation and Protein Levels as Well as Growth Rate and Stress Responses of Haloferax volcanii. J. Bacteriol. 191: 3794-3803 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Doebber, M., Bordignon, E., Klare, J. P., Holterhues, J., Martell, S., Mennes, N., Li, L., Engelhard, M., Steinhoff, H.-J. (2008). Salt-driven Equilibrium between Two Conformations in the HAMP Domain from Natronomonas pharaonis: THE LANGUAGE OF SIGNAL TRANSFER?. J. Biol. Chem. 283: 28691-28701 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bidle, K. A., Kirkland, P. A., Nannen, J. L., Maupin-Furlow, J. A. (2008). Proteomic analysis of Haloferax volcanii reveals salinity-mediated regulation of the stress response protein PspA. Microbiology 154: 1436-1443 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Allen, M. A., Goh, F., Leuko, S., Echigo, A., Mizuki, T., Usami, R., Kamekura, M., Neilan, B. A., Burns, B. P. (2008). Haloferax elongans sp. nov. and Haloferax mucosum sp. nov., isolated from microbial mats from Hamelin Pool, Shark Bay, Australia. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 58: 798-802 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fukushima, E., Shinka, Y., Fukui, T., Atomi, H., Imanaka, T. (2007). Methionine Sulfoxide Reductase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis, an Enzyme Designed To Function at Suboptimal Growth Temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 189: 7134-7144 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Robinson, J. L. Articles by Shand, R. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Robinson, J. L. Articles by Shand, R. F.