This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLeod, B. N.
Right arrow Articles by Spiegelman, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McLeod, B. N.
Right arrow Articles by Spiegelman, G. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, April 2005, p. 2532-2536, Vol. 187, No. 7
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.187.7.2532-2536.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Soj Antagonizes Spo0A Activation of Transcription in Bacillus subtilis

Brett N. McLeod and George B. Spiegelman*

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Received 20 October 2004/ Accepted 28 December 2004


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
The ParA family protein Soj appears to negatively regulate sporulation in Bacillus subtilis by inhibiting transcription from promoters that are activated by phosphorylated Spo0A. We tested in vitro Soj inhibition of Spo0A-independent variants of a promoter that Soj inhibited (PspoIIG). Transcription from the variants was less sensitive to Soj inhibition, suggesting that inhibition of wild-type PspoIIG was linked to transcription activation by Spo0A.


arrow
TEXT
 
Bacillus subtilis responds to nutrient deprivation and high population densities by initiating a pattern of morphological development resulting in the release of a dormant endospore (9, 10, 12, 26). The decision to sporulate is governed by the levels of phosphorylated Spo0A (Spo0A~P) (9, 10, 12, 26). One central function of Spo0A~P is to activate the transcription of essential stage II operons, including spoIIA, spoIIE, and spoIIG (2, 9, 10, 24, 26-28). The spoIIA and spoIIG operons encode sporulation-specific sigma factors that direct early developmental transcription in the forespore and mother cell compartments, respectively (11, 15, 16, 19).

The spo0J operon is a dicistronic unit encoding proteins that belong to the ParA and ParB families, whose members are widely dispersed throughout the bacteria (1, 7, 17). Spo0J is a sequence-specific DNA binding protein in the ParB family that binds in vitro and in vivo to several origin-proximal DNA sites, termed parS (18). Deletion of spo0J results in a phenotype with a low frequency of anucleate cells accumulating during growth and a block to sporulation before stage II (14, 21). The sporulation block is relieved by the deletion of the parA homologue, soj (14). Transcription from spoIIA, spoIIE, and spoIIG promoters is severely reduced in a {Delta}spo0J mutant and restored close to wild-type levels in a {Delta}soj spo0J double mutant (14, 22). Soj associates with the spo0A, spoIIA, spoIIE, and spoIIG promoters in vivo, and these associations are more pronounced in the absence of Spo0J (22, 23). In vitro Soj inhibits transcription from the spoIIG promoter (PspoIIG) activated by either Spo0A~P or the constitutively active C-terminal domain of Spo0A (Spo0AC) (3). These results imply that Soj acts as a negative regulator of sporulation by inhibiting transcription that is activated by phosphorylated Spo0A.

In vitro, Soj dissociates complexes formed by incubating a DNA fragment containing PspoIIG, Spo0AC, and RNA polymerase (RNAP) (3). The Soj-induced dissociation of the promoter-Spo0A-RNAP is unusual, and it was suggested that Soj might act at a step in initiation that follows the action of Spo0A (3). To further explore the mechanism of Soj action, we first needed to distinguish whether or not Soj specifically blocked an activity of Spo0A. We reasoned that if Soj targeted a step in transcription that was independent of Spo0A, then Soj inhibition of a PspoIIG variant that had been mutated so it no longer required Spo0A for high activity would be the same as its inhibition of wild-type PspoIIG. To test this idea, we constructed a set of mutated spoIIG promoters affected only in the spacer between the –10 and –35 consensus sequences. As reported here, in vitro transcription from these spacer-shortened spoIIG promoters was independent of Spo0A and showed an altered response to Soj.

Characterization of the shortened spoIIG promoters. Bases between the –10 and –35 consensus sequences of PspoIIGBglII were deleted to create the shortened promoters used in this study (Fig. 1A). Promoters with deletions of 6, 5, and 4 bp were termed PspoIIG16, PspoIIG17, and PspoIIG18, where the numbers indicate the length of the spacer (in bases) between the –10 and –35 sequences. The –10 and –35 consensus sequences as well as the Spo0A binding sites ("0A boxes") of PspoIIG were not affected by the deletions.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. (A) Sequence of PspoIIG and shortened spoIIG promoters. The region between +1 and –60 is indicated. The –10 and –35 sequences are in boldface letters. Underlined bases indicate 0A boxes. Dashes indicate bases deleted from BglII-treated pUCIIGBglIItrpA by incubation with mung bean nuclease followed by ligation. Italic letters in PspoIIGBglII indicate a BglII site that was introduced into pUCIIGtrpA (24). (B) Nucleotide initiation requirements for the indicated promoter. The first addition indicates the initiation nucleotides incubated with promoter DNA (6 nM) and RNAP (25 nM) (and Spo0AC at 1 µM when PspoIIG was used) for 2 min at 37°C. The second addition indicates elongation nucleotides incubated for an additional 5 min in the presence of heparin (15 µg ml–1) in a 20-µl reaction mixture. Transcription was monitored by [{alpha}-32P]GTP (7.7 µM, 23 Ci mmol–1) incorporation; all other nucleotides were present at 0.6 mM. Values in parentheses indicate the amount of transcript, measured relative to the amount of transcript from PspoIIG18 with ATP, GTP, and CTP as the initiating nucleotides. (C) Transcription from PspoIIG and shortened promoters in the presence and absence of Spo0AC with ATP and GTP as the initiating nucleotides. Products from transcription assays were separated by electrophoresis on an 8% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The major transcript was detected and quantified by exposure of the gel to a phosphor screen followed by analysis with Imagequant software (v5.0; Amersham Biosciences). Error bars represent the standard deviation from the average of four independent transcription assay reactions.

The transcription initiation requirements of the shortened promoters were tested and compared to those of wild-type PspoIIG by in vitro transcription assays (Fig. 1B), as described in detail elsewhere (3). For all templates, addition of both ATP and GTP along with DNA and purified B. subtilis RNAP (25), before the addition of heparin, was necessary for high levels of transcription. Inclusion of CTP with the incubation of RNAP plus ATP and GTP had little effect on initiation, except at PspoIIG17, where it markedly increased transcription initiation. Primer extension experiments indicated that the transcription start site for all three shortened promoters was the same as that for PspoIIG (data not shown). We concluded that the deletion of the bases between the –10 and –35 sequences did not change the nucleotide dependence of initiation or the transcription start site of the shortened promoters compared to that of PspoIIG.

While Spo0A~P or Spo0AC was required for high-level transcription from PspoIIG, this was not true for PspoIIG17 or PspoIIG18; in fact, inclusion of Spo0AC in transcription assay reactions with PspoIIG17 or PspoIIG18 template DNA led to 22 and 23% decreases in transcription, respectively (Fig. 1C). This provides the first direct evidence that the action of Spo0AC in stimulating PspoIIG is to overcome the barrier to transcription imposed by the 22-bp spacer, since reducing the spacer eliminates the Spo0AC requirement.

Analysis of ATP binding and hydrolysis by purified Soj. We measured the ATP binding and hydrolysis by Soj to assess whether the purified protein was active. Soj was purified as previously described (3), except that transcription reaction buffer (25) with 15% glycerol, 300 mM sodium chloride, and 100 µM ATP, but without either dithiothreitol or bovine serum albumin, was used as the column buffer. This change increased Soj yield and solubility. Soj was dialyzed against storage buffer (same as described above, except with 50 mM sodium chloride) and stored at –70°C.

Soj (5 µM) was incubated with 50 µM nucleotide for 2 min at 37°C, UV cross-linked on ice, and precipitated essentially as described previously (6). The precipitate was subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and the dried gel was exposed to a phosphor screen and visualized with a PhosphorImager PSI (Amersham Biosciences). A major band at 28 kDa was present, corresponding to Soj cross-linked to radionucleotide when incubated with ATP (Fig. 2A). No cross-linked species appeared if the sample was not UV treated. Soj cross-linked dATP to a lesser extent but did not cross-link to GTP (Fig. 2A).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. ATP binding and hydrolysis activities of Soj. (A) Nucleotide binding specificity of Soj. {alpha}32-P-labeled nucleotides (50 µM, 24.8 Ci mmol–1) were incubated with 12.5 µM Soj or 0.1 mg of bovine serum albumin (BSA) ml–1 and UV cross-linked followed by trichloroacetic acid precipitation and solubilization in SDS-PAGE sample buffer as described previously (6). Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE on a 12% polyacrylamide gel, and the dried gel was exposed to a phosphor screen. An arrow indicates the position of Soj as determined by staining of the gel with Coomassie brilliant blue prior to drying. (B) SDS-PAGE (12% polyacrylamide) of purified Soj (4.6 µg), judged to be over 99% pure by staining with Coomassie brilliant blue, and low-range molecular weight standards (Bio-Rad Laboratories). (C) Soj time course of ATPase activity. Soj (4.2 µM) and 100 µM [{alpha}-32P]ATP (9.9 Ci mmol-1) were incubated at 37°C, and samples were applied as spots onto a polyethyleneimine thin-layer chromatography plate and developed as described previously (6). (D) ATP dependence of ATPase. Soj (1.8 µM) was incubated with the indicated [{alpha}-32P]ATPconcentrations (12.4 to 0.62 Ci mmol-1) for 16 min at 37°C, and the products were analyzed by exposure of the developed thin-layer chromatography plates to a phosphor screen.

Soj-mediated hydrolysis of ATP, detected by thin-layer chromatography (6), was linear for the first 16 min of the assay (Fig. 2B). The rate of ATP hydrolysis increased up to approximately 140 µM ATP (Fig. 2C), and a turnover number of (4.9 ± 1.8) x 10–3 s–1 was calculated. The ATP turnover of Soj was slightly lower than that of ParA from Caulobacter crescentus (2.6-fold) (8) and higher than those of Escherichia coli P1 plasmid ParA and MinD (4- and 10-fold, respectively) (4-6, 13). This demonstrates that Soj, like other ParA family proteins, is a weak ATPase. The ATPase activity of ParA from the P1 plasmid of E. coli is stimulated 10-fold in the presence of ParB and DNA (4). The ATPase activity of MinD is stimulated 10-fold by the presence of MinE and phospholipids (13). However, we have not been able to detect stimulation of Soj ATPase by simple addition of Spo0J and/or DNA.

Inhibition of transcription from shortened spoIIG promoters. Transcription from Spo0AC-activated PspoIIG was inhibited 10-fold relative to transcription in the presence of Soj storage buffer alone over the range of ~0.15 to 3.5 µM Soj (Fig. 3A). Inhibition by ~0.15 µM Soj is more obvious in the insert in Fig. 3A, where Soj concentrations are plotted on a logarithmic scale. Changing the input of Spo0AC did not appreciably alter the Soj inhibition curves, suggesting that Soj and Spo0A do not compete for binding to RNAP (data not shown). Two promoters not expected to be affected by Soj were also tested. The A2 promoter (PA2) is from bacteriophage {phi}29 and was previously reported to be unaffected by Soj in vitro (3). The abrB gene promoter (PabrB) was reported to be unaffected by mutational loss of the spo0J gene in vivo (3). Levels of transcription inhibition from PA2 and PabrB were similar, occurring over a broad range and beginning to decrease only when Soj concentrations approached 1 µM (Fig. 3B and C). These data indicated that Soj has a low-affinity inhibitory property seen at PA2 and PabrB and a high-affinity inhibitory property seen at PspoIIG.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3. Soj-mediated transcription inhibition. The indicated concentrations of Soj were incubated with PspoIIG (the insert indicates transcription at lower Soj concentrations) (A) or PA2 (B) and ATP plus GTP (and Spo0AC at 1 µM when PspoIIG was used) for 2 min at 37°C before the addition of RNAP. After another 2 min, heparin and nucleotides required for transcript elongation were added, and the reaction was stopped after 5 min of elongation. The relative transcription was measured as the percentage of transcription in the absence of Soj. To maintain a consistent ionic strength among reaction samples, Soj was diluted into storage buffer and a constant volume was added to each reaction. The same volume of storage buffer alone was added to the control reactions. (C) Soj-mediated transcription inhibition at PabrB. Transcription assays were performed as described for panel A, except the initiation nucleotides used were ATP plus GTP plus UTP, and the transcripts were separated by electrophoresis on a 12% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. (D) Soj-mediated transcription inhibition at PspoIIG18 in the presence ({diamondsuit}) or absence ({blacksquare}) of 1 µM Spo0AC. The assays were performed and analyzed as described for panel A. Error bars represent the standard deviation from the average percentage of at least three independent transcription assays.

Levels of Soj inhibition of transcription from PspoIIG16, PspoIIG17, and PspoIIG18 showed similar profiles, and only the data for inhibition of PspoIIG18 are shown (Fig. 3D). Soj-mediated transcription inhibition of PspoIIG18 was similar to that of PA2, producing similar inhibition curves over the same Soj values. The sensitivity of PspoIIG18 to Soj inhibition was not affected by the presence of Spo0AC. These results indicated that Soj transcription inhibition at PspoIIG18 was of the low-affinity type. Thus, loss of the requirement for Spo0AC activation changed Soj-dependent inhibition of transcription from PspoIIG from the high-affinity type to the low-affinity type.

A previous study concluded that Soj did not inhibit transcription from PA2 (3). The data in that paper showed a 30% reduction of transcription at ~4.5 µM Soj, which is similar to the inhibition level shown in Fig. 3B. The reduction was previously interpreted as being not due to Soj. The experiments reported here carefully controlled reaction conditions with respect to ionic strength and organic solvents and used higher concentrations of Soj. These experiments allowed us to resolve the low-affinity inhibition effect at PA2, PabrB, and the shortened promoters.

Because PspoIIG transcription is dependent on activated Spo0A, we were previously unable to tell whether Soj inhibition reflected interaction of Soj with a DNA sequence at PspoIIG or an interaction with the RNAP-Spo0A complex. The data reported here indicate that the high-affinity inhibition reflects the latter, since it was seen only with the Spo0A-activated promoter. If the low-affinity inhibition results from interaction of Soj with a specific DNA sequence, it must be degenerate, since comparison of the PA2, ParbB, and PspoIIG sequences did not reveal any obvious common motifs. Given the low ATPase activity of Soj, it is unlikely that the low-affinity inhibition reflects loss of ATP during the transcription reaction. Phosphorylated Spo0A activates approximately 40 genes, the majority of which encode sporulation-specific proteins (20). Potentially most of these will also be negatively regulated by Soj.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Valentina Mendoza for plasmid pUCIIGBglIItrpA, Steve Seredick for RNAP and Spo0AC, and members of the G.B.S. laboratory for helpful comments and discussion.

This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institute for Health Research and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to G.B.S.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbia, 6174 University Blvd., Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada. Phone: (604) 822-2036. Fax: (604) 822-6041. E-mail: spie{at}interchange.ubc.ca. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Bignell, C., and C. M. Thomas. 2001. The bacterial ParA-ParB partitioning proteins. J. Biotechnol. 91:1-34.[CrossRef][Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Bird, T. H., J. K. Grimsley, J. A. Hoch, and G. B. Spiegelman. 1993. Phosphorylation of Spo0A activates its stimulation of in vitro transcription from the Bacillus subtilis spoIIG operon. Mol. Microbiol. 9:741-749.[Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Cervin, M. A., G. B. Spiegelman, B. Raether, K. Ohlsen, M. Perego, and J. A. Hoch. 1998. A negative regulator linking chromosome segregation to developmental transcription in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 29:85-95.[CrossRef][Medline]
    4. 4
  4. Davis, M. A., K. A. Martin, and S. J. Austin. 1992. Biochemical activities of the ParA partition protein of the P1 plasmid. Mol. Microbiol. 6:1141-1147.[Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Davis, M. A., L. Radnedge, K. A. Martin, F. Hayes, B. Youngren, and S. J. Austin. 1996. The P1 ParA protein and its ATPase activity play a direct role in the segregation of plasmid copies to daughter cells. Mol. Microbiol. 21:1029-1036.[CrossRef][Medline]
    6. 6
  6. de Boer, P. A., R. E. Crossley, A. R. Hand, and L. I. Rothfield. 1991. The MinD protein is a membrane ATPase required for the correct placement of the Escherichia coli division site. EMBO J. 10:4371-4380.[Medline]
    7. 7
  7. Draper, G. C., and J. W. Gober. 2002. Bacterial chromosome segregation. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56:567-597.[CrossRef][Medline]
    8. 8
  8. Easter, J., Jr., and J. W. Gober. 2002. ParB-stimulated nucleotide exchange regulates a switch in functionally distinct ParA activities. Mol. Cell 10:427-434.[CrossRef][Medline]
    9. 9
  9. Errington, J. 2003. Regulation of endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 1:117-126.[CrossRef][Medline]
    10. 10
  10. Grossman, A. D. 1995. Genetic networks controlling the initiation of sporulation and the development of genetic competence in Bacillus subtilis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 29:477-508.[CrossRef][Medline]
    11. 11
  11. Hilbert, D. W., and P. J. Piggot. 2004. Compartmentalization of gene expression during Bacillus subtilis spore formation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68:234-262.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Hoch, J. A. 1993. Regulation of the phosphorelay and the initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 47:441-465.[CrossRef][Medline]
    13. 13
  13. Hu, Z., and J. Lutkenhaus. 2001. Topological regulation of cell division in E. coli. Spatiotemporal oscillation of MinD requires stimulation of its ATPase by MinE and phospholipid. Mol. Cell 7:1337-1343.[CrossRef][Medline]
    14. 14
  14. Ireton, K., N. W. Gunther IV, and A. D. Grossman. 1994. spo0J is required for normal chromosome segregation as well as the initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 176:5320-5329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Karmazyn-Campelli, C., C. Bonamy, B. Savelli, and P. Stragier. 1989. Tandem genes encoding sigma-factors for consecutive steps of development in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev. 3:150-157.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 16
  16. Kroos, L., B. Zhang, H. Ichikawa, and Y. T. Yu. 1999. Control of sigma factor activity during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. Mol. Microbiol. 31:1285-1294.[CrossRef][Medline]
    17. 17
  17. Leipe, D. D., Y. I. Wolf, E. V. Koonin, and L. Aravind. 2002. Classification and evolution of P-loop GTPases and related ATPases. J. Mol. Biol. 317:41-72.[CrossRef][Medline]
    18. 18
  18. Lin, D. C., and A. D. Grossman. 1998. Identification and characterization of a bacterial chromosome partitioning site. Cell 92:675-685.[CrossRef][Medline]
    19. 19
  19. Margolis, P., A. Driks, and R. Losick. 1991. Establishment of cell type by compartmentalized activation of a transcription factor. Science 254:562-565.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    20. 20
  20. Molle, V., M. Fujita, S. T. Jensen, P. Eichenberger, J. E. Gonzalez-Pastor, J. S. Liu, and R. Losick. 2003. The Spo0A regulon of Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 50:1683-1701.[CrossRef][Medline]
    21. 21
  21. Mysliwiec, T. H., J. Errington, A. B. Vaidya, and M. G. Bramucci. 1991. The Bacillus subtilis spo0J gene: evidence for involvement in catabolite repression of sporulation. J. Bacteriol. 173:1911-1919.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    22. 22
  22. Quisel, J. D., and A. D. Grossman. 2000. Control of sporulation gene expression in Bacillus subtilis by the chromosome partitioning proteins Soj (ParA) and Spo0J (ParB). J. Bacteriol. 182:3446-3451.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    23. 23
  23. Quisel, J. D., D. C. Lin, and A. D. Grossman. 1999. Control of development by altered localization of a transcription factor in B. subtilis. Mol. Cell 4:665-672.[CrossRef][Medline]
    24. 24
  24. Satola, S., P. A. Kirchman, and C. P. Moran, Jr. 1991. Spo0A binds to a promoter used by sigma A RNA polymerase during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:4533-4537.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    25. 25
  25. Seredick, S. D., B. M. Turner, and G. B. Spiegelman. 2003. Assay of transcription modulation by Spo0A of Bacillus subtilis. Methods Enzymol. 370:312-323.[CrossRef][Medline]
    26. 26
  26. Sonenshein, A. L. 2000. Control of sporulation initiation in Bacillus subtilis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3:561-566.[CrossRef][Medline]
    27. 27
  27. Trach, K., D. Burbulys, M. Strauch, J. J. Wu, N. Dhillon, R. Jonas, C. Hanstein, P. Kallio, M. Perego, and T. Bird. 1991. Control of the initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis by a phosphorelay. Res. Microbiol. 142:815-823.[Medline]
    28. 28
  28. York, K., T. J. Kenney, S. Satola, C. P. Moran, Jr., H. Poth, and P. Youngman. 1992. Spo0A controls the {sigma}A-dependent activation of Bacillus subtilis sporulation-specific transcription unit spoIIE. J. Bacteriol. 174:2648-2658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Bacteriology, April 2005, p. 2532-2536, Vol. 187, No. 7
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.187.7.2532-2536.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Seredick, S. D., Seredick, B. M., Baker, D., Spiegelman, G. B. (2009). An A257V Mutation in the Bacillus subtilis Response Regulator Spo0A Prevents Regulated Expression of Promoters with Low-Consensus Binding Sites. J. Bacteriol. 191: 5489-5498 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Doubrovinski, K., Howard, M. (2005). Stochastic model for Soj relocation dynamics in Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 9808-9813 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLeod, B. N.
Right arrow Articles by Spiegelman, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McLeod, B. N.
Right arrow Articles by Spiegelman, G. B.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»