Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, May 2005, p. 3151-3157, Vol. 187, No. 9
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.187.9.3151-3157.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Marc Lemonnier,1,
*
Sandra Santos-Sierra,1,
Alfredo Berzal-Herranz,2 and
Ramón Díaz-Orejas1
Department of Molecular Microbiology, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, CSIC, Ramiro de Maeztu 9, E-28040 Madrid, Spain,1 Instituto de Parasitología y Biomedicina "López-Neyra", CSIC, Parque Tecnológico de Ciencias de la Salud, Avda. del Conocimiento s/n, Armilla, E-18100 Granada, Spain2
Received 20 December 2004/ Accepted 25 January 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among TA systems, one of the best characterized is the parD operon of plasmid R1 (4), also found in plasmid R100 and called pem (38). Its toxin and antitoxin pair of proteins, respectively Kid (PemK) and Kis (PemI), has been shown to form a tight nontoxic complex that autoregulates parD at the level of transcription (34). The Kid toxin inhibits cell growth in Escherichia coli, while the Kis antitoxin reverses this effect (5). Surprisingly, Kid was found to be also toxic in eukaryotic cells, since uncoupled production of Kid and Kis triggered apoptosis in human cells and regulated cell proliferation in yeast and metazoa (9). Moreover, the chpIK system of the spirochete Leptospira interrogans, a close homologue of the E. coli parD system, was reported to be active in yeast (31), while the RelE toxin encoded by the heterologous TA system relBE of E. coli was shown to inhibit cell growth in yeast (24) and to induce apoptosis in human cells (39).
These data supported the emerging concept that bacterial TA systems could trigger programmed cell death in prokaryotes and eukaryotes by a conserved mechanism. However, only recently was the mode of action of these TA toxins substantially clarified, despite some discrepancies in the different reports. Kid, as well as the MazF toxin (its homologue from the mazEF [chpA] system of E. coli [27]), cleaves RNA in vitro and in vivo, and these activities are counteracted by their cognate antitoxins (29, 40-42). According to these data, the MazF and Kid toxins cleave RNA in a ribosome-independent manner (29, 40-42) to interfere specifically with mRNA function (40-42) or to inhibit RNA-regulated cellular processes in general (29). Moreover, purified MazF inhibited protein synthesis in E. coli cell extracts (42) and in rabbit reticulocyte lysates (29, 42). To date, inhibition of protein synthesis by Kid has been reported only for E. coli, both in vivo and in cell-free systems (28, 40). On the other hand, it has been proposed that MazF inhibits protein synthesis in E. coli by inducing the cleavage of mRNAs in vivo by a still undefined factor (7), in a manner reminiscent of the mode of action of the RelE toxin, which cleaves translated mRNAs at the ribosomal A site in vivo and in vitro (6, 30). Furthermore, the reports on the specificities of RNA cleavage by MazF in vitro have been basically inconsistent. MazF was shown either to cleave at the 5' end of ACA sites situated in single-stranded regions in mRNA (42), leaving 5'-OH ends at one side (41), or to cleave at the 5' end of residue A in NAC sites (where N is U or A) in single- or double-stranded RNA regions (29). By a procedure similar to the one that was used in the former MazF studies (42), Kid was shown to cleave only single-stranded RNA preferentially at UAH sequences, where H is C, A, or U (40). Thus, the mode of action of the Kid toxin and how it accounts for the known in vivo activities of the protein are still an unsolved question.
In this paper we approach this issue by providing evidence that the Kid toxin promotes RNA cleavage and inhibits protein synthesis in mammalian cell-free systems. We show that the Kis antitoxin specifically reverses these effects and that a specific Kid variant that is nontoxic in E. coli fails to degrade RNA and to inhibit protein synthesis in the eukaryotic cell-free system. Moreover, we illustrate the inhibition of ColE1 DNA replication by Kid, a phenomenon that was previously described (32, 35), by presenting clues that link this effect to the RNase activity of the toxin. In addition, we provide an independent analysis of RNA cleavage by Kid that further documents and clarifies the mechanisms underlying this activity.
|
|
|---|
Protein synthesis in E. coli. In vitro protein synthesis in E. coli was monitored by using the E. coli S30 Extract System for Circular DNA (Promega). Initial reaction mixtures (10 µl) contained pBESTluc plasmid DNA (400 ng), 3 µl of S30 extract, 4 µl of S30 premix, and 1 µl of a mixture of amino acids minus methionine (1 mM). The assay was started by adding 3 µCi of [35S]methionine and 0.4 µl of dilutions of the purified protein Kid, Kis, or KidR85W followed by incubation for 30 min at 37°C. The reactions were analyzed using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (12.5%).
Protein synthesis and mRNA stability in rabbit reticulocyte lysates.
Protein synthesis was monitored using the Rabbit Reticulocyte Lysate system (Promega). Initial reaction mixtures (10 µl) contained 7 µl of rabbit reticulocyte lysate, 0.2 µl of amino acid mixture minus methionine (1 mM), 0.1 µg of luciferase control RNA, and 0.3 µl of KCl (70 mM, final concentration), complemented with 0.2 µl of RNAguard RNase Inhibitor (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The assays were started by adding 4 µCi of [35S]methionine and 3 pmol of the purified proteins and incubating for 1 h at 30°C. The reactions were analyzed using SDS-PAGE (10%). For RNA stability analyses, uniformly labeled luciferase mRNA was obtained from in vitro transcription with T7 RNA polymerase (3) in the presence of [
-32P]UTP and using as a DNA template a PCR-generated product based on the LTRW-LUC plasmid (1) and the pair of primers 5'-ATAGGATCCTTACAATTTGGACTTTCC-3' and 5'-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGTACTGTTGGTAAAATGGAAGAC-3'. RNA was fractionated by electrophoresis on a 4% polyacrylamide gel containing 7 M urea in Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) buffer and was eluted as described previously (3). One-half picomole of RNA was added to reaction mixtures (10 µl) that contained 7 µl of rabbit reticulocyte lysate, 0.2 µl of amino acid mixture (1 mM), KCl at 70 mM, 0.2 µl of RNAguard RNase Inhibitor, and 3 pmol of the diluted purified proteins. The reactions were incubated for 2 min at 30°C and were stopped by chilling quickly in dry ice. The RNAs were extracted with phenol and chloroform and were separated as described above.
In vitro RNA cleavage analysis.
The CopA, CopT, and TAR RNAs were prepared and 5' end labeled using [
-32P]ATP as described previously (29). The cleavage reactions were carried out using 1,000 cpm of 5'-end-labeled RNAs in 10 mM KCl, 10 µg ml1 bovine serum albumin, 2 mM HEPES, pH 7.8, in the presence of 4 U of SUPERase-In (Ambion). The purified Kid, KidR85W, and His6-Kis were added when appropriate, and the reaction mixtures were incubated for 2 min at 37°C. The reactions were stopped by adding formamide loading buffer and chilling quickly in dry ice. The RNAs were separated on 8% polyacrylamide gels containing 7 M urea in TBE buffer. The control reactions (alkali ladder and digestions with RNase T1) were performed as described previously (29).
In vitro ColE1 DNA replication and RNA II stability.
DNA replication assays were performed using ColE1 plasmid DNA and type II extracts of the E. coli K-12 strain C600, as described previously (35). For RNA II stability analyses, uniformly labeled RNA II was obtained from in vitro transcription with T7 RNA polymerase and [
-32P]UTP using, as a DNA template, the PCR product generated with the ColE1 plasmid and the pair of primers 5'-TAATACGACTCACTATAGCAAACAAAAAAACCACCGCTAC-3' and 5'-GGAAGAAGGCCACGTAGCAG-3'. The resulting RNA was purified as described above for the internally labeled luciferase mRNA. The stability assay was performed in reaction mixtures (12 µl) that contained 0.25 pmol of RNA II and 80 cpm of a 5'-labeled PCR DNA fragment (used as a loading control) and, when specified, with the purified Kis, Kid, or KidR85W protein (300 nM each). The reactions were carried out at 37°C for 10 min and were stopped by chilling quickly in dry ice. The RNA was fractionated by electrophoresis on a 4% polyacrylamide gel containing 7 M urea in TBE buffer.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Inhibition of protein synthesis and RNA degradation by Kid in cell extracts. (A) Coupled transcription/translation assay of E. coli S30 extracts using a luciferase-encoding plasmid as the template. 35S-labeled products translated in the presence of the indicated concentrations (nM) of purified Kid, Kis, or KidR85W proteins were analyzed using SDS-PAGE (12.5%). The left lane is a control sample treated with chloramphenicol (30 µg/ml, + Cm). (B) Protein synthesis in rabbit reticulocyte lysates using luciferase mRNA as the template. 35S-labeled protein products translated in the presence of the purified Kid, Kis, or KidR85W proteins (300 nM) were analyzed using SDS-PAGE (10%). (C) Degradation of luciferase mRNA by Kid. Internally 32P-labeled luciferase mRNA (50 nM) was incubated for 2 min at 30°C with Kid, Kis, or KidR85W (300 nM each) prior to fractionation by polyacrylamide-urea gel electrophoresis. (D) Same experiment as in panel C, except that rabbit reticulocyte lysates were added to the reaction mixtures together with the luciferase mRNA and the Kid, Kis, or KidR85W proteins.
|
RNA cleavage by Kid is modified in cell extracts. Since Kid is an endoribonuclease (40) and this activity was proposed to account for both the inhibition of protein synthesis and the in vivo toxic effects of Kid, we analyzed whether RNA cleavage by Kid would be affected by (i) the nontoxic R85W mutation and (ii) the presence of cell extracts. When Kid was added directly to gel-purified 32P-labeled luciferase mRNA, several cleavage products were produced (Fig. 1C). These products were absent when Kid and Kis were added together. When the KidR85W mutant protein was used, fewer cleavage products were observed, whose size corresponded to products obtained with the wild-type Kid protein. This suggested that KidR85W retained a specific RNA cleavage activity, albeit markedly reduced compared to the wild-type Kid toxin. Since the toxicity of KidR85W is completely abolished in E. coli cells (25, 36) and this protein has no detectable effects on protein synthesis (see above), these results suggested either that there was no strict correlation between RNA cleavage and protein synthesis inhibition or that the RNA cleavage by KidR85W was inhibited in the presence of cellular factors. To address this issue, gel-purified luciferase mRNA was incubated with rabbit reticulocyte lysates before the cleavage reaction was initiated in the presence of Kid or KidR85W (Fig. 1D). Surprisingly, while the cleavage by Kid was clearly apparent, the activity of KidR85W was dramatically inhibited in the rabbit reticulocyte lysates (Fig. 1D). Incubation with the Kis antitoxin prevented the degradation of RNA by Kid and by KidR85W, irrespective of the presence of cell extracts (Fig. 1C and D; see also results below). Similar results were obtained when E. coli S30 extracts were used instead of rabbit reticulocyte lysates (data not shown). Altogether, the RNA cleavage pattern in cell extracts was consistent with the results obtained when protein synthesis was monitored, indicating that both activities were tightly correlated.
The R85W mutation affects but does not abolish RNA cleavage by Kid in vitro. To further analyze the endoribonuclease activities of Kid and of its nontoxic variant KidR85W, we performed an RNA cleavage analysis using a panel of three small model RNA molecules (TAR, CopA, and CopT RNAs) that were previously used to characterize the endoribonuclease activity of the MazF toxin (29). The three RNAs were 5' end labeled with 32P, purified, and challenged with increasing amounts of the purified Kid toxin prior to being fractionated by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Also included were RNA samples treated either with alkali or with RNase T1 to allow the precise mapping of the cleavage sites. TAR, CopA, and CopT RNAs were present as single RNA species that were cleaved in the three cases by the Kid toxin (Fig. 2A). The cleavage products were absent when Kid was provided together with the Kis antitoxin, thus indicating that the activity was specific. Kid cleaved the TAR RNA at four positions, with a clear preference for three sites in which cleavage occurred at the 5' or 3' side of the A residue in the dinucleotide sequence 5'-UA-3' (Fig. 2). Of these sites, the one that was situated in the 3' single-stranded region of TAR RNA was cut at the lowest concentration of Kid, indicating a preferential accessibility to cleavage (Fig. 2, empty squares, corresponding to TAR). This general tendency in cleavage preference was confirmed by the analysis performed on the CopA and CopT RNAs. In both cases, the most intense bands corresponded to cleavages between U and A nucleotides, predominantly situated in single-stranded regions of the RNA (Fig. 2). In fact, out of the 12 cleavage sites detected in the overall analysis, only 2 did not involve a 5'-UA-3' sequence (Fig. 2C). Interestingly, 9 out of the 10 cleavage sites at 5'-UA-3' corresponded to UAA or UAC triplets and only one to UAG. When KidR85W was used, RNA cleavage was observed at specific sites that were also cleaved by wild-type Kid (Fig. 2A). Moreover, the cleavage by KidR85W was inhibited by Kis, thereby indicating that the mutant protein formed an efficient complex with Kis and thus was properly folded (Fig. 2A). Compared to wild-type Kid, the patterns obtained using KidR85W differed in that the cleavage activity was (i) from a quantitative point of view reduced, as apparent in TAR and CopT analysis, and consistent with the results obtained with the luciferase mRNA (Fig. 1C); and (ii) restricted to cuts between the first and second nucleotides of UAA and UAC sites, predominantly in single-stranded regions, which correspond to the preferred cleavage sites for the wild-type Kid protein.
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. In vitro analysis of RNA cleavage by Kid. (A) 5'-32P-labeled TAR, CopA, and CopT RNAs were incubated with increasing concen2.trations (0.005, 0.05, 0.5 and 1 µM) of Kid or KidR85W proteins prior to being fractionated by 8% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of urea. Where indicated, Kis was added with Kid (1 µM each). Kid cleavage sites are indicated by open symbols. , OH, and T1 denote samples untreated, partially hydrolyzed with alkali, and digested with RNase T1, respectively. The figure shows a representative pattern in which all the cleavage products are visualized, which was obtained in more than three independent experiments. (B) Secondary structures of TAR, CopA, and CopT RNAs and their respective Kid cleavage sites. (C) Summary of the sites of RNA cleavage by Kid and their secondary structure environment. SS and DS stand for single-stranded and double-stranded RNA regions, respectively. Symbols in panels B and C are as indicated in panel A.
|
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. ColE1 plasmid replication and Kid. (A) DNA replication assays. The ColE1 plasmid was allowed to replicate in type II E. coli extracts in the presence of [32P]dCTP and of increasing concentrations of Kid or KidR85W. Proteins were added at 175 nM (lanes 3 and 6), 350 nM (lanes 4 and 7), and 700 nM (lanes 5 and 8). Also shown is the replication in the absence of exogenous proteins (lane 1) and in the presence of rifampin (Rif, 25 µg/ml, lane 2). The reactions were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The gels were stained with ethidium bromide (upper panel) prior to being dried and subjected to autoradiography (lower panel). RFI and RFII indicate the positions of covalently closed and open circular DNA, respectively. (B) Stability of the ColE1 primer RNA II. The uniformly labeled RNA II (indicated by the "R" arrow) was incubated for 10 min at 37°C without added proteins (lane 1) or with purified Kid (lane 2), Kid and Kis (lane 3), or KidR85W (lane 4). The proteins were added at 300 nM. A 5'-labeled DNA fragment ("D" arrow) was included in the reaction mixtures as an internal control.
|
|
|
|---|
Formerly, the specificity of RNA cleavage by Kid was addressed by Zhang and collaborators in an independent work to show that (i) Kid cleaves at the 5' or 3' side of the A residue in UAC, UAA, or UAU and (ii) only the sites situated in single-stranded regions are cleaved (40). Our results are fully consistent with their first conclusion, with the sole nuance that we also see cleavage at UAG (Fig. 2C). We did not observe cleavage at UAU, but it can be argued that the UAU sites that are present in the RNAs that we analyzed are all situated in double-stranded regions (Fig. 2C). Thus, we cannot rule out that UAU in single-stranded RNA regions are target sites for Kid. We also observed cleavage either at the 5'or 3' side of the first A in UAA (see the cleavages symbolized respectively by a square and a triangle in TAR, Fig. 2C), again consistent with the first conclusion of Zhang et al.
In contrast, our results do not support their second statement. Using three different small, natural RNA substrates, we observed that the Kid toxin cleaves RNA with a preference for UAA or UAC sites present in single-stranded regions. However, the same sequences situated in double-stranded RNA regions were efficiently cleaved by Kid (Fig. 2). Interestingly, the KidR85W nontoxic mutant generally conserved the ability to cleave single-stranded RNA sites but was severely affected in the cleavage of sites situated in double-stranded RNA (Fig. 2C). The fact that KidR85W failed to inhibit protein synthesis in E. coli and rabbit reticulocyte cell-free systems (Fig. 1) indicates that the capacity to cleave canonical UAA and UAC sites in single-stranded RNA regions does not account by itself for the inhibition of protein synthesis and the cytotoxicity of the protein. Rather, it seems that a specific type of Kid-RNA interaction, which the R85W mutation disrupts, is needed for Kid to efficiently degrade RNA and inhibit protein synthesis in vivo. Thus, the cleavage of double-stranded RNA by Kid exists, and it is correlated with the cytotoxicity of the protein. In addition, the observation that the presence of rabbit reticulocyte lysates influences the cleavage pattern of the toxin opens the possibility that particular host factors modulate the activity of Kid in vivo. These factors, which remain unidentified, may either influence the accessibility of the Kid to the target cleavage sites or, alternatively, modify the architecture of the Kid-RNA complex to alter its activity. Addressing these mechanistic issues awaits further structural studies aimed at the resolution of such complexes, as well as direct approaches towards the identification of the host factors that influence the activity of Kid.
Since Kid inhibited the initiation of replication of the ColE1 plasmid and overexpression of the E. coli DnaB helicase neutralized the toxicity of Kid (35), it was suggested that DnaB was the target of Kid. In this paper we show that the ColE1 RNA II primer, which is required for initiation of ColE1 replication, is efficiently cleaved by Kid in vitro. In addition, the nontoxic KidR85W mutant, which inefficiently cleaves this primer, fails to inhibit this replication. These data correlate the cleavage of the RNA primer by Kid and the inhibition of ColE1 replication. However, testing the effects of the toxin on the nascent RNA primer will be required to directly evaluate this correlation, as natural inhibition of ColE1 replication by the antisense RNAI occurs during synthesis and folding of the preprimer (37). Thus, it is possible that the RNase activity of Kid accounts for its inhibitory effect on this and other RNA-dependent processes other than translation. Alternatively, DnaB overexpression could lead to indirect titration of Kid toxicity, perhaps through massive stimulation of primer synthesis, as reported for in vitro studies (23). Although the involvement of DnaB in the mechanism of action of Kid cannot be formally ruled out, we believe that there is increasing evidence, to which this work contributes, that this link is due to circumstantial, indirect effects.
In addition, we have shown that Kid inhibits protein synthesis in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cell extracts. Both activities were counteracted by the Kis antitoxin and were not displayed by the KidR85W mutant. which is nontoxic in E. coli cells. Thus, our results show that inhibition of protein synthesis and toxicity in E. coli cells are two tightly linked phenomena. Our data also provide a hint on the possible mechanism that accounts for the cytotoxicity of Kid in eukaryotes. There are other bacterial cytotoxic RNases that inhibit protein synthesis and provoke the death of eukaryotic cells (reviewed in reference 26), such as RNases Sa2 and Sa3 of Streptomyces aureofaciens (19, 20, 26), colicin E3 of E. coli (8), barnase of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (21), and binase of Bacillus intermedius (21). Although there is no available evidence of structural or functional similarities between these toxins and Kid, it is interesting that in general small, positively charged RNases like Kid have the most potent cytotoxic effect in tumor cell lines (26). Conditional death by apoptosis induced by Kid in such cell lines has been described (9). Whether Kid, MazF, or other toxins of this family will play a valuable role in the field of antitumoral research remains to be tested. However, inasmuch as the RNA cleavages by Kid and MazF are not extremely specific in terms of primary and secondary structure requirements (29; this work), it is doubtful that these enzymes will prove to be useful in the structural mapping of RNA. In contrast, the increased specificity of KidR85W towards single-stranded RNA shows that Kid variants with tight site specificity may be obtained. Together with further structural information on RNA-toxin complexes, this will open the way to the rational design of a second generation of more specific and potent cytotoxic RNases encoded by the parD family.
This work was supported by grants from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (SAF-2002-04649), the CSIC (PIES 200420E006 and 200420E062), and the Spanish REIPI Network of the "Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias" (CO314).
These authors contributed equally to this work. ![]()
Present address: Institut für Biochemische Pharmakologie, Universität Innsbruck, Peter Mayr Strasse 1, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»