This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elderkin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Buck, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elderkin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Buck, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, May 2005, p. 3238-3248, Vol. 187, No. 9
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.187.9.3238-3248.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Molecular Determinants for PspA-Mediated Repression of the AAA Transcriptional Activator PspF

Sarah Elderkin,{dagger} Patricia Bordes, Susan Jones,{ddagger} Mathieu Rappas, and Martin Buck*

Imperial College London, Department of Biological Sciences, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom

Received 20 October 2004/ Accepted 29 January 2005


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
The Escherichia coli phage shock protein system (pspABCDE operon and pspG gene) is induced by numerous stresses related to the membrane integrity state. Transcription of the psp genes requires the RNA polymerase containing the {sigma}54 subunit and the AAA transcriptional activator PspF. PspF belongs to an atypical class of {sigma}54 AAA activators in that it lacks an N-terminal regulatory domain and is instead negatively regulated by another regulatory protein, PspA. PspA therefore represses its own expression. The PspA protein is distributed between the cytoplasm and the inner membrane fraction. In addition to its transcriptional inhibitory role, PspA assists maintenance of the proton motive force and protein export. Several lines of in vitro evidence indicate that PspA-PspF interactions inhibit the ATPase activity of PspF, resulting in the inhibition of PspF-dependent gene expression. In this study, we characterize sequences within PspA and PspF crucial for the negative effect of PspA upon PspF. Using a protein fragmentation approach, we show that the integrity of the three putative N-terminal {alpha}-helical domains of PspA is crucial for the role of PspA as a negative regulator of PspF. A bacterial two-hybrid system allowed us to provide clear evidence for an interaction in E. coli between PspA and PspF in vivo, which strongly suggests that PspA-directed inhibition of PspF occurs via an inhibitory complex. Finally, we identify a single PspF residue that is a binding determinant for PspA.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
Bacterial cell adaptation to changes in membrane integrity is crucial for their survival. One response to extracytoplasmic stress involves the phage shock protein (Psp) system that is highly conserved in several gram-negative bacteria, including some pathogens. The Escherichia coli psp locus is made up of (i) two divergently transcribed cistrons, pspABCDE and pspF, and (ii) the newly identified pspG gene (22, 35). The Psp response is induced by the mislocalization of some outer membrane proteins, including secretins (38, 40); by mutations that cause secretion defects (16, 26, 27); and by a number of more general stresses, such as extreme heat and osmotic and ethanol shock (40). A common event resulting from all of these inducing conditions may be dissipation of the proton motive force (PMF). The PMF is important to achieve various membrane-mediated processes, such as protein translocation across the membrane and flagellar motor rotation (21, 43). Several lines of evidence suggest that PspA helps to sustain the PMF across the plasma membrane (31). Interestingly, the psp genes appear to be involved in bacterial infectious processes, since the Psp system is essential for the virulence of Yersinia enterocolitica (14, 15) and the psp genes are among the most highly upregulated genes in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium during macrophage infection (20). Further, the psp operon is also upregulated during swarming in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (48) and during biofilm formation in E. coli (3).

In E. coli, pspA and pspG promoter activities are dependent on the {sigma}54 sigma factor of RNA polymerase (RNAP) (7, 35) and the {sigma}54-RNAP activator protein PspF (28). {sigma}54 activators belong to the AAA (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) superfamily (42, 46, 53). Transcription initiation by {sigma}54-RNAP is strictly dependent on AAA activators, such as PspF (8). {sigma}54 AAA activators typically bind to upstream activating sequences located upstream of the transcription start site and contact the {sigma}54-RNAP closed complex via DNA loop formation (51). {sigma}54 AAA activators are macromolecular machines that convert the energy derived from ATP hydrolysis to a mechanical force, which is used to stimulate the isomerization of preformed {sigma}54-RNAP closed promoter complexes to open ones (9, 23). Their unifying structural feature is that they form ring-shaped higher-order oligomers required for ATPase activity, as the catalytic site lies at the interface between two adjacent protomers (46, 53). Although the exact oligomeric state of AAA activators is not clear, it has been established that one active form of the AAA domain of PspF is a hexameric ring (45, 46, 53).

AAA activators of the {sigma}54-RNAP are modular proteins, typically consisting of three functional domains (47): (i) a {sigma}54-interacting domain, the AAA domain, which is primarily responsible for ATP hydrolysis, self-association, and transcription activation (5, 12, 33, 46, 49, 53); (ii) an enhancer DNA-binding domain (DBD), usually located at the C-terminal end of the activator protein (51); and (iii) regulatory domains typically present in the N-terminal region of the protein, controlling the activity of the AAA activator in response to specific environmental cues (47). PspF belongs to an atypical class of AAA activators that lack a regulatory domain but are regulated by direct in trans interactions with other regulatory proteins. PspF is negatively regulated by PspA (18, 19, 40), and hence, PspA has at least two roles: (i) helping the bacterial cells to cope with alterations of the cell membrane and (ii) repressing its own transcription and that of psp genes.

PspA is a peripheral inner membrane protein that exists in a membrane-attached and a soluble form (6, 30). The molecular mode of action for PspA as a negative regulator of PspF remains poorly understood. Previous studies showed that PspA forms a complex with the AAA domain of PspF in vitro and that PspA inhibits PspF ATPase activity, possibly by preventing nucleotide access to the active site or by inhibiting formation of the correct oligomeric form (19, 25). PspA shows no sequence similarities with the regulatory domains of other AAA activators, but it has a homologue found in photosynthetic bacteria and plant chloroplasts, VIPP1, which is involved in thylakoid biogenesis (32, 50).

Here, we characterize sequences within PspA and PspF that are crucial for PspA-mediated inhibition of PspF. We conducted protein fragmentation studies to obtain partial sequences of PspA that retained the ability to inhibit PspF-dependent gene activation in vivo and in vitro. The requirement for the integrity of a large N-terminal part of PspA for its activity was established. In addition, based on the crystal structure of the AAA activator NtrC1 from Aquifex aeolicus (34), we derived a theoretical model of a hexameric ring of the AAA domain of PspF (PspF1-275). Using this model, we identified a PspF-specific residue (W56) exposed at the surface of the PspF hexamer and show that it is a determinant for binding PspA.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
Bacterial strains and culture conditions. The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Cells were grown aerobically at 37°C in LB medium. When required, ampicillin, kanamycin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline were used at concentrations of 100, 50, 30, and 10 µg/ml, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Plasmids and bacterial strains

DNA manipulations. pSLE18A was the template to amplify DNA encoding PspA fragments using appropriate primers for PspA1-186, PspA1-110, PspA110-222, PspA67-186, and PspA67-222 (Fig. 1). PCR fragments were cloned into pGEMT-easy (Amersham Biosciences) and were inserted into NdeIHindIII-digested pET28b+ (Novagen). Plasmids pSLEPspA1-186, pSLEPspA1-110, pSLEPspA110-222, pSLEPspA67-222, and pSLEPspA67-186 encode PspA fragments as six-His fusion proteins.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. PspA fragments. (A) Schematic showing (to scale) the predicted four helical domains (HD1 to -4) of E. coli PspA using the COILS program. (B) Coomassie blue-stained 18% SDS-PAGE gel showing the PspA fragments purified as six-His fusion proteins.

Plasmids encoding full-length PspF or residues 1 to 275 (pSLE40 and pPB1, respectively) were the template for construction of mutant PspF1-275W56A using the Quickchange mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). Briefly, mutated DNA was synthesized by Pfu DNA polymerase in a reaction containing pSLE40 or pPB1 and a large molar excess of complementary mutagenic oligonucleotides. Following 30 cycles of heating at 95°C for 1 min, 50°C for 1 min, and 68°C for 12 min, the reaction mixtures were treated with DpnI to remove the parental DNA. The resulting reaction was used to transform E. coli MC1061 cells. Mutant clones were verified by DNA sequencing. The resulting plasmids, pPB8-W56A and pPB1-W56A, encode PspFW56A and PspF1-275W56A, respectively, as amino-terminal six-His-tagged fusion proteins.

PspA, PspA fragments, and PspF were amplified by PCR from plasmids pSLE18A, pSLEPspA1-186, pSLEPspA1-110, pSLEPspA110-222, pSLEPspA67-222, pSLEPspA67-186, and pSLE40 using appropriate primers that introduce SacI and KpnI restriction sites and cloned into SacI-KpnI-digested pSR658 and pSR659 vectors (17).

pSLE18A was XbaI-SacI digested, and the pspA-containing sequence was cloned into the kanamycin-resistant pAPT110 plasmid (44) so as to express the wild-type PspA protein under the control of a lacUV5 promoter (pPB9 plasmid). pSLE40 and pSLE40-W56A were XbaI-HindIII digested, and the pspF-containing sequences were cloned into the chloramphenicol-resistant pBAD18-Cm (24) so as to express the PspF proteins under the control of the pBAD promoter (pPB8-WT and pPB8-W56A, respectively).

Proteins. E. coli core RNA polymerase was purchased from Epicentre technologies. Klebsiella pneumoniae {sigma}54 protein was purified as described previously (9). E. coli PspA, PspF1-275, and PspF were overproduced and purified as amino-terminal six-His-tagged fusion proteins as described previously (19, 29). PspA fragments were purified as was PspA (19).

Native gel mobility shift assays. A Sinorhizobium meliloti nifH (–12/–11) DNA probe for DNA-based assays ({sigma} isomerization) was constructed essentially as described previously (9, 10). Protein binding reactions were conducted in STA buffer (25 mM Tris acetate [pH 8.0], 8 mM Mg acetate, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 3.5% [wt/vol] PEG-6000) and using 16 nM 32P-end-labeled DNA. {sigma}54 was present at 1 µM and dGTP at 4 mM. PspF1-275 was preincubated in STA buffer with various amounts (as indicated in the figures) of PspA, PspA fragments, bovine serum albumin (BSA), or PspA storage buffer for 10 min at 30°C prior to addition of the mixture to the {sigma} isomerization assay for 10 min. Protein-DNA complexes were analyzed on a 4.5% native polyacrylamide gel run at 60 V for 80 min in 25 mM Tris, 200 mM glycine buffer (pH 8.6) and were detected by PhosphorImager analysis (Fuji Bas-1500; Tina version 2.10g software).

PspA-PspF binding assays were conducted in STA buffer as described previously (19). Briefly, PspF1-275 (5 µM) was incubated with various concentrations of PspA or PspA fragments (as indicated in the figures) for 10 min at 30°C, and protein-protein complexes were analyzed on a 4.5% native polyacrylamide gel run at 4°C. Proteins were visualized by Coomassie staining.

ATP hydrolysis. Assays to measure the ATPase activity of PspF were essentially performed as described previously (19, 46). Briefly, ATPase assays were carried out in reaction buffer (35 mM Tris acetate [pH 8.0], 70 mM K acetate, 5 mM Mg acetate, 19 mM NH4 acetate, 0.7 mM dithiothreitol). PspF (500 nM) was preincubated with increasing concentrations of PspA or PspA fragments in reaction buffer for 10 min at 30°C. ATPase activity was measured by adding 4 mM ATP containing [{alpha}-32P]ATP (0.06 µCi/µl)-ADP. Reactions were stopped after 30 min by adding 5 volumes of 2 M formic acid. Released [{alpha}-32P]ADP was separated from [{alpha}-32P]ATP using thin-layer chromatography and measured by phosphorimaging.

Bacterial two-hybrid screen and ß-galactosidase assays. The PspF and PspA two-hybrid expression plasmids were transformed into the E. coli SU101 and SU202 reporter strains to assay homodimerization and heterodimerization, respectively (17). To assay for ß-galactosidase activity, overnight cultures in LB with the appropriate antibiotics were diluted 25-fold into the same medium containing 1 mM IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside). Cultures were incubated at 37°C until the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) reached 0.5. Cells were harvested and assayed for ß-galactosidase activities as described by Miller (39). The units were calculated from the results of at least three independent cultures assayed in triplicate.

In vivo inhibition of PspF activity by PspA. E. coli strain MVA4 carrying a chromosomal pspA::lacZ operon fusion was transformed with two compatible plasmids, pPB9 (carrying pspA under control of the lacUV5 promoter) and either pPB8-WT or pPB8-W56A (carrying wild-type pspF and mutant pspFW56A, respectively, under control of the pBAD promoter). Overnight cultures in LB containing 0.2% glucose and the appropriate antibiotics were diluted 100-fold and grown for 3 h in the same media. Following the addition of 1 mM IPTG and 0.2% arabinose, the cells were grown for 1 h (OD600, ~1.5) and assayed for ß-galactosidase activity as described above.

Western blotting. Proteins were separated on a 12.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel and were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes using a semidry transblot system (Bio-Rad). Anti-LexA (1:4,000 dilution; Invitrogen) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (1:8,000 dilution; Sigma) antibodies were used for detection with the ECL chemiluminescence system (Pharmacia).


arrow
RESULTS
 
Design, expression, and purification of PspA fragments. The E. coli pspA gene encodes the 222-amino-acid PspA protein. PspA is predicted to contain four {alpha}-helices that form a coiled-coil structure comprising nearly the entire length of the protein (18). Strikingly, this coiled-coil core is shared by the PspA homologue VIPP1 (1). To elucidate sequences within PspA that are essential for negative regulation of {sigma}54-dependent transcription mediated by PspF, we used a protein fragmentation analysis of PspA. Based on a coiled-coil structure prediction program using the Lupas algorithm (COILS) (36, 37) and multiple sequence alignments (created by the Clustal X program), we identified four putative {alpha}-helical domains (HD1 to -4) (Fig. 1A) within the PspA protein. The fragments of PspA were chosen to include a minimum of two predicted {alpha}-helical elements (Fig. 1A). The partial sequences of pspA were constructed and overproduced as amino-terminal six-His-tagged fusion proteins (Fig. 1B). The fragments are named after the encoding region of PspA that they comprise (i.e., fragment PspA1-186 includes residues 1 to 186 of PspA). Fragments PspA1-186, PspA1-110, PspA67-222, and PspA67-186 were released from the insoluble cell fraction with CHAPS {3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate} treatment, as occurs for PspA (19). Fragment PspA110-222 was found to be mainly in the soluble fraction. For parity, we chose to include CHAPS in the purification of all PspA fragments (Fig. 1B).

Binding interactions between PspA fragments and the AAA domain of PspF in vitro. We screened for the ability of the five PspA fragments to interact with PspF. In the in vitro assays described hereafter, we used two forms of PspF, either the full-length protein or, for experimental simplicity, a fragment that comprises only the AAA domain (PspF1-275) (5). Direct binding of PspA to PspF1-275 can be detected using native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) followed by Coomassie staining and does not require {sigma}54 or any other Psp proteins (19). As shown in Fig. 2, no interaction was detected between PspF1-275 and PspA fragments PspA110-222, PspA67-222, and PspA67-186. By contrast, PspA1-186 and PspA1-110 retained the ability to interact with PspF1-275, the complex formed by PspA1-110 being weaker than those formed by PspA or PspA1-186 (Fig. 2, compare lanes 10 to 13 with lanes 3 to 5 and 6 to 9). These results show that the major PspF binding determinants are contained within the three N-terminal {alpha}-helical domains of PspA (HD1 to -3) and that the integrity of HD1 is required for complex formation. Notably, the interaction between PspA1-186 and PspF1-275 leads to a significantly tighter complex, as resolved on native PAGE, than does the interaction between PspA and PspF1-275, and this could be partly due to PspA1-186 being more homogeneous on native PAGE than PspA (Fig. 2, compare lane 6 to lane 2). Moreover, this tight complex is clearly seen at a 1:1 ratio of PspF1-275 to PspA1-186, while the complex between PspF1-275 and PspA forms at a 1:2 ratio of PspF1-275 to PspA. These data suggest that (i) PspA fragment PspA1-186 binds PspF1-275 with greater affinity and/or in a more stable manner than PspA and (ii) HD4 of PspA destabilizes the complex between PspA and PspF. The latter may be of significance for controlling PspA-PspF interactions and relieving inhibition.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. Interaction between PspA fragments and the AAA domain of PspF (PspF1-275). Coomassie-stained native gel showing complex formation between 5 µM PspF1-275 and increasing amounts of PspA or PspA fragments (5, 10, and 20 µM). Migration properties of PspA and PspA fragments (20 µM) in the absence (–) of PspF are shown in lanes 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, and 22.

PspA determinants for the inhibition of PspF1-275 functionality in vitro. We screened the biochemical activities of the PspA fragments using a number of assays designed to evaluate the contributions of PspA helical domains to the negative control of PspF-dependent open-complex formation. PspA has been shown to inhibit PspF-mediated remodeling (isomerization) of a basal {sigma}54-DNA complex (19). {sigma}54-DNA isomerization by PspF reflects a step in open-complex formation and can be assayed using PspF1-275, hydrolyzable nucleotides, and a heteroduplex S. meliloti promoter probe that contains a 2-bp mismatch at the –12 and –11 positions (Fig. 3A) [(–12/–11) DNA probe] relative to the transcription start site +1, representing the distorted DNA within the closed complex (9, 41). The efficiency of the activator-driven isomerization of the {sigma}54/(–12/–11) DNA complex can be measured by native PAGE analysis. As shown in Fig. 3A, the isomerized {sigma}54/(–12/–11) DNA complex migrates more slowly, as a supershifted complex [ss {sigma}54/(–12/–11) DNA], on native gels than the nonisomerized initial {sigma}54/(–12/–11) DNA complex (compare lane 3 with lane 2). Preincubation of PspA with PspF1-275 leads to 100% inhibition of PspF1-275-mediated {sigma} isomerization at a 3:1 ratio of PspA to PspF1-275 (Fig. 3A, compare lane 3 with lane 6) (19). Only two PspA fragments, PspA1-186 and PspA1-110, were found to inhibit PspF1-275 remodeling activity (Fig. 3A and data not shown). Complete inhibition of PspF1-275-mediated {sigma} isomerization by PspA1-186 occurred at a 3:1 ratio of PspA fragment to PspF1-275, which was similar to the inhibition caused by PspA (Fig. 3A, compare lanes 7 to 9 with 4 to 6). Inhibition of PspF1-275-mediated {sigma} isomerization by PspA1-110 was weak, and a much higher concentration of PspA1-110 (10:1 ratio of PspA fragment to PspF1-275) than PspA or PspA1-186 was required to reach ~90% inhibition (Fig. 3A, compare lanes 10 to 14 to lanes 4 to 6 and lanes 7 to 9). We ensured that inhibition by the PspA1-110 fragment was specific to the PspA sequences and not due to high protein concentrations per se by preincubating BSA with PspF1-275 at a 10:1 ratio. No effect of BSA was detected on the level of PspF1-275-mediated {sigma} isomerization (data not shown).




View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3. Effects of PspA fragments on PspF1-275 functioning. (A) Native gel showing the effects of PspA fragments on nucleotide-dependent isomerization of {sigma}54 bound to (–11/–12) DNA probe by PspF1-275 when PspA fragments were preincubated with PspF1-275. Reaction mixtures contained (+) 16 nM of 32P-end-labeled S. meliloti nifH promoter (–11/–12) DNA probe, 1 µM of {sigma}54, 4 mM dGTP, 1 µM of PspF1-275, and increasing concentrations of PspA or PspA fragments (1, 2, and 3 µM for PspA, Psp1-186, and PspA110-222; 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 µM for PspA1-110). The isomerized complex is marked ss {sigma}54/(–11/–12) DNA. Complexes were detected by PhosphorImager analysis. (B) Effects of PspA fragments on PspF ATPase activity. The ATPase activity of PspF was measured by incubating 500 nM PspF with [{alpha}-32P]ATP for 30 min, followed by separation of [{alpha}-32P]ATP and [{alpha}-32P]ADP on thin-layer chromatography and was quantified by PhosphorImager analysis. The graph shows the amount of ATP turnover of PspF when preincubated with increasing concentrations of PspA or PspA fragments (PspA1-186 and PspA1-110s) 10 min before the addition of [{alpha}-32P]ATP to start the ATP hydrolysis reaction. (C) Native gel showing the effects of the combination of PspA fragments PspA110-222 and PspA1-110 on nucleotide-dependent isomerization of {sigma}54 bound to (–11/–12) DNA probe by PspF1-275. {sigma} isomerization reactions were conducted as for panel A. When present (+), PspA was at 3 µM (lane 4). The reactions in lanes 5 to 9 were done using 3 µM PspA1-110. In lanes 6 to 8, increasing concentrations of PspA110-222 (1, 2, and 3 µM) were added to 3 µM of PspA1-110. Lane 9 and lane 15 represent the addition of PspA fragment storage buffer and BSA, respectively, substituted for 3 µM PspA110-222. The reactions in lanes 10 to 14 were done using 3 µM PspA110-222. In lanes 11 to 13, increasing concentrations of PspA1-110 (1, 2, and 3 µM) were added to 3 µM of PspA110-222. Lane 14 represents the addition of storage buffer substituted for 3 µM PspA1-110.

The ATP hydrolysis activity of PspF is required for its ability to activate transcription. The ATPase activity of PspF can be analyzed by using a thin-layer chromatography approach and measuring the release of [{alpha}-32P]ADP from radiolabeled [{alpha}-32P]ATP under different conditions (46). Previously, we showed that PspA inhibits ATP hydrolysis by PspF (19) (Fig. 3B). PspA1-186 and PspA1-110 were the only PspA fragments to inhibit PspF-dependent ATP hydrolysis activity (Fig. 3B and data not shown). Compared to the inhibitory effect of PspA, PspA1-186 gave a similar marked decline of the ATPase activity of PspF (Fig. 3B), but at a slightly higher concentration of 1 µM compared to 0.2 µM PspA. Interestingly, PspA1-110 inhibited PspF ATPase activity, but at 2 µM and less efficiently (Fig. 3B). Overall, these results show that major determinants for the repression of PspF activity are contained within the three N-terminal {alpha}-helical domains of PspA (HD1 to -3). Thus, there is a strong correlation between the abilities of PspA to repress PspF functionality and to bind directly to PspF, implying that the determinants for these dominant physical interactions between PspA and PspF are required for the inhibitory effect of PspA.

We then addressed the issue of whether the C-terminal region of PspA (PspA110-222; HD3 to -4) could stimulate the weak activity of the N-terminal region of PspA (PspA1-110; HD1 to -2) as though it were within the full-length PspA protein. We preincubated PspA1-110 with increasing concentrations of PspA110-222 and assayed the inhibitory effect of the mixture on PspF1-275-mediated {sigma} isomerization. The results showed that the addition of PspA110-222 to PspA1-110 increases the inhibitory activity of PspA1-110 to levels similar to those of the inhibition caused by PspA (Fig. 3C, compare lane 8 to lane 4). The reciprocal experiment, in which increasing concentrations of PspA1-110 were preincubated with PspA110-222, also resulted in clear repression of PspF1-275 activity, consistent with the former experiment (Fig. 3C, lanes 6 to 8). Control experiments were performed to ensure that none of the concentrations of PspA110-222 used in this assay had any inhibitory effect on PspF1-275-mediated {sigma} isomerization (Fig. 3A and data not shown) and that the activity was specific to PspA sequences, since replacing one of the PspA fragments with BSA or with PspA storage buffer did not stimulate the inhibitory activity of the other PspA fragment (Fig. 3C and data not shown). A similar recovery of the activity of PspA1-110 by adding increasing concentrations of PspA110-222 was observed when we tested the inhibition of PspF-dependent ATP hydrolysis (data not shown). These results suggest that there are determinants in the C-terminal domains HD3 and HD4 that are required for the functioning of PspA as a negative regulator of PspF and that interactions between the N-terminal and C-terminal helical domains are required for the full inhibition of PspF activity in vitro, possibly by stabilizing the interaction of PspF with the N-terminal part of PspA or through formation of a higher-order structure of PspA.

Binding interactions between PspA fragments and the AAA domain of PspF in vivo. We showed previously that PspA and PspF interact in vitro (19). To determine whether PspA and the PspA fragments could interact with PspF in vivo and therefore to establish that our in vitro binding assays reflected faithfully the in vivo situation, we took advantage of a LexA-based genetic system for studying protein-protein interactions in an E. coli background (13, 17). The bacterial transcriptional repressor LexA has two domains, an N-terminal DBD and a C-terminal dimerization domain. A truncated LexA consisting of only the DBD can recognize its operator sequence, but it is functional as a transcriptional repressor only in a dimeric form. Other proteins can be fused in frame to the DBD and will restore the repressor's function if these domains interact. Since PspA and PspF can both form higher-order oligomers (12, 25), we used a modified system that is sensitive only to the formation of heterodimers (17). The PspA and PspF proteins were, respectively, fused to a wild-type (plasmid pRS658) and a mutant (plasmid pRS659) LexA DBD. Their heteroassociation was specifically measured by the transcriptional repression of the reporter gene lacZ, controlled by a hybrid operator, sulA, containing a wild-type half-site and a mutated operator half-site. The identities and production of the LexA fusion proteins were verified by Western blot analysis using an antibody raised to the LexA protein (Fig. 4 and data not shown). Only those fusion proteins that repressed expression of ß-galactosidase at a reproducible level of ≥25% of the controls were considered to be interacting efficiently (13). As shown in Table 2, we observed a significant interaction between PspA and PspF, quantitated as 69% repression of ß-galactosidase activity in cells harboring the LexA-PspA fusion expressed from the pSR658 vector and the LexA-PspF fusion in the pSR659 vector and as 73% repression of ß-galactosidase activity in the reciprocal experiment. The heterodimerization between PspA and PspF was slightly less efficient than the multimerization of PspA or PspF when the proteins were expressed from pSR658 and tested with a wild-type LexA-based genetic system PspA, with 83% and 84% repression of ß-galactosidase activity, respectively (data not shown). Further, the results showed that only the PspA fragment PspA1-186 was able to significantly interact with PspF (Table 2). The interaction results were evident and reproducible in the reciprocal experiment with opposite vector pairs (data not shown). Although PspA1-110 interacts with PspF1-275 in vitro, no evidence for a complex was detected between PspA1-110 and PspF in vivo (Table 2), possibly suggesting that other determinants are required for stable complex formation between PspA1-110 and PspF in vivo.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4. Western blot analysis of LexAwtDBD-PspA fragment fusion proteins. LexAwtDBD-PspA fragment fusions were expressed in E. coli SU202 using 1 mM IPTG. An immunoblot of crude lysates of IPTG-induced cultures (OD600, ~0.5) probed with anti-LexA antiserum (Invitrogen) is shown. The calculated molecular masses (in kilodaltons) for the LexA fusions are in parentheses: lane 1, LexA-PspA (34.6); lane 2, LexA-PspA1-186 (30.4); lane 3, LexA-PspA1-110 (21.5); lane 4, LexA-PspA1-67 (16.5); lane 5, LexA-PspA67-222 (27); lane 6, LexA-PspA110-222 (22); lane 7, LexA-PspA67-186 (22.9).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Interactions between PspA fragments and PspF using an in vivo bacterial two-hybrid system in E. coli

We tested whether the PspA fragments with established in vitro activities were able to inhibit PspF function in vivo by using primer extension to assess the levels of pspA transcription from cells overexpressing either the LexA-PspA fusion, the LexA-PspA fragment fusions, or the DBD of LexA on its own as a control (data not shown). Only PspA1-186 inhibited transcription of pspA to a level similar to that of PspA (data not shown), fully consistent with repression data from the bacterial two-hybrid system. Overall, these results indicate that HD4 of PspA is dispensable for the interaction of PspA with PspF and for the inhibition of PspF-dependent activation of transcription in vivo and in vitro.

Identification of a putative PspF binding site for PspA. Previous characterization of PspA function suggested that PspA prevented or altered the self-association of PspF, which in turn inhibited PspF ATPase activity (18, 19, 25). Given that the major determinants for self-association and ATPase activity are contained within the AAA domain of PspF, we postulated that PspA could bind to surface-exposed regions of the AAA domain of PspF and that these regions should be located close to the protomer-protomer interface and the ATPase active site. In addition, since PspA inhibits specifically the activity of PspF and not other AAA activators of the {sigma}54-RNAP (19), PspA-interacting surfaces on PspF may well be unique to PspF. To identify these specialized regions, we used a bioinformatics-based approach. We created a sequence alignment of PspF proteins from different bacterial species (Yersinia pestis, Yersinia enterocolitica, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, E. coli, Vibrio cholerae, and Klebsiella pneumoniae) using the Clustal X and Genedoc programs to identify conserved amino acids within PspF (data not shown). This was amalgamated with a sequence alignment of the {sigma}54 AAA activators NifA and NtrC from different species to identify conserved residues specific to PspF (data not shown). Once identified, these residues were then mapped onto a theoretical model of the hexameric ring of the AAA domain of PspF (PspF1-275) derived from the crystal structure of the AAA activator NtrC1 from Aquifex aeolicus (Fig. 5) (34). The single amino acid that matched the criteria we imposed is W56 (Fig. 5).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5. Theoretical atomic model of a PspF1-275 hexamer highlighting the probable location of W56. The model was prepared by submitting the sequence of the PspF AAA domain to the 3D-JIGSAW comparative-modeling server (http://www.bmm.icnet.uk/servers/3djigsaw/). The server builds three-dimensional models for proteins based on homologues of known structures (2). Theoretical coordinates for residues P31 to V237 were obtained based on the crystal structure of NtrC1 (34) (Protein Data Base [PDB] entry, 1NY5) with 95% accuracy. The high accuracy of the model is linked to the high sequence identity between PspF and NtrC1 sequences for the region of interest: 50.5%. Because the AAA domain of p97 crystallized as a hexamer, the model was superimposed onto the D1 structure of p97, including residues 200 to 458 (52) (PDB entry, 1E32), using the computer program CCP4-GUI. An accurate superposition was obtained due to the high secondary-structure conservation among AAA domains. A theoretical PspF hexamer was then generated using the CCP4-GUI. The figures were prepared using Pymol (http://pymol.sourceforge.net/) and POV-Ray (http://www.povray.org/). (A) Top view of a theoretical PspF1-275 hexamer shown in a grey cartoon representation. W56 in individual monomers is shown in a red-sphere representation. The probable locations of two of the six W56s are further highlighted using red circles. (B) Side view of the same hexamer with the putative location of one W56 highlighted using a red circle.

To probe the function of W56 in PspF1-275, we used a site-directed mutagenesis approach to replace the tryptophan residue with alanine, the residue found in most NtrC and NifA homologues. PspF1-275W56A was purified as an N-terminal histidine-tagged fusion protein and was soluble and homogeneous as judged by SDS-PAGE analysis (data not shown). The mutant PspF1-275 protein was tested using a range of in vitro assays reflecting different steps of the activation pathway and compared to wild-type PspF1-275 activity. These included (i) ATP hydrolysis activity (46); (ii) stable oligomer formation in the presence of ADP · AlFx, a transition state analogue of ATP at the point of hydrolysis (12); (iii) ADP · AlFx-dependent binding to {sigma}54 (12); (iv) {sigma} isomerization (9); and (v) activation of the {sigma}54-RNAP (5). The results showed that PspF1-275W56A had wild-type-like functioning in vitro (data not shown). Thus, the single-amino-acid substitution W56A had no detrimental effects on the properties of PspF1-275 required for transcription activation of the {sigma}54-RNAP.

The PspF1-275W56A mutant is insensitive to PspA negative regulation in vitro. If the W56 residue of PspF is a target for PspA binding, then PspF1-275W56A should be less sensitive to PspA-dependent inhibition. To address this issue, we examined the effect of PspA on PspF1-275W56A-dependent isomerization of the {sigma}54/(–12/–11) DNA complex. In the absence of PspA, wild-type PspF and PspF1-275W56A show similar levels of {sigma} isomerization (Fig. 6A, compare lane 3 to lane 6). In contrast to wild-type PspF, the preincubation of increasing concentrations of PspA with PspF1-275W56A resulted in no significant inhibition of {sigma} isomerization (Fig. 6A, compare lanes 3 to 5 with lanes 6 to 8). These results suggest that PspF1-275W56A is insensitive to PspA inhibitory function in vitro.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 6. PspF1-275W56A escapes the inhibitory actions of PspA in vitro. (A) Native gel showing the effects of PspA on nucleotide-dependent isomerization of {sigma}54 bound to (–11/–12) DNA probe by either PspF1-275 or PspF1-275W56A (1 µM) when increasing PspA fragments (2 and 3 µM) were preincubated with PspF1-275 proteins. Reactions were as in Fig. 3, and complexes were detected by PhosphorImager analysis. (B) Coomassie-stained native gel showing complex formation between PspA and either wild-type PspF1-275 or mutant PspF1-275W56A. Binding reactions were conducted with 5 µM PspF1-275 (lanes 2 to 5) or PspF1-275W56A (lanes 6 to 9) with increasing concentrations of PspA (0, 5, 10, and 15 µM).

To determine whether this loss of sensitivity to PspA inhibition could be due to a lack of interaction with PspA, we tested whether PspF1-275W56A could bind PspA in vitro. Increasing concentrations of PspA were incubated with either wild-type PspF1-275 or PspF1-275W56A, and the reaction products were analyzed by native PAGE and Coomassie staining (Fig. 6B). PspF1-275W56A migrates slightly faster than wild-type PspF1-275 on a native gel, probably because of the loss of the hydrophobic side chain of the tryptophan residue. Mutant PspF1-275W56A did not detectably bind PspA compared to wild-type PspF1-275 (Fig. 6B, compare lanes 6 to 9 with lanes 2 to 5). These data suggest that the inability of PspA to inhibit PspF1-275W56A is due to the inability of PspA to form an inhibitory complex with PspF1-275W56A.

PspA is not able to act as a negative regulator of the PspFW56A mutant in vivo. Using the same LexA-based bacterial two-hydrid system described above, we measured heteroassociation between PspA and PspFW56A. As shown in Table 2 and in agreement with our in vitro binding assay, we observed only a weak interaction between PspA and PspFW56A, quantitated as 38% repression of ß-galactosidase activity in cells harboring the LexA-PspA fusion expressed from the pSR658 vector and the LexA-PspF fusion in the pSR659 vector. These data indicate that W56 of PspF is a major binding determinant for PspA, and the residual repression of ß-galactosidase activity suggests that interactions between PspA and PspF independent of W56 do occur in vivo.

To examine whether the W56A substitution in PspF could alter the inhibitory effect of PspA on PspF-dependent activation of transcription in vivo, we developed an in vivo assay. E. coli MVA4 is a derivative of MC1061 and carries a pspA::lacZ chromosomal fusion (Apr). MVA4 was transformed with two compatible plasmids (Fig. 7): pPB9 (Kmr), carrying pspA under control of the lacUV5 promoter, and either pPB8-WT or pPB8-W56A (Cmr), carrying wild-type pspF and mutant pspFW56A, respectively, under control of the pBAD promoter. As expected, the overexpression of the wild-type PspF by adding 0.2% arabinose to the cultures resulted in the activation of the chromosomal pspA::lacZ (fourfold increase) (Fig. 7A). The simultaneous induction of PspA expression with 1 mM IPTG dramatically decreased ß-galactosidase activity to background levels (i.e., in the absence of overproduced PspF). Control experiments in which we used the template plasmids without the psp gene showed no effect on the levels of ß-galactosidase expression (data not shown). These results are fully consistent with PspA being a negative regulator of PspF and validate the use of this in vivo assay to determine the action of PspA upon PspF. We repeated the assay with the PspFW56A mutant protein (Fig. 7B). Strikingly, overproduced PspFW56A showed a higher ß-galactosidase activity than overproduced PspF, since we observed an ~6-fold increase (compare Fig. 7B to A). In addition, in the absence of IPTG, the ß-galactosidase activities measured with and without inducing the overexpression of PspFW56A were not significantly different (Fig. 7B). These data suggest that the leaky expression of PspFW56A can stimulate the transcription of the chromosomal wild-type pspA promoter, possibly because chromosomally encoded PspA can no longer inhibit the functioning of the PspFW56A mutant. In agreement with this hypothesis, the IPTG-dependent overexpression of PspA did not decrease the activity of PspFW56A as measured by the levels of ß-galactosidase activity (Fig. 7B). The use of the same assay based on PspF1-275 derivatives confirmed these results (data not shown). The results clearly demonstrate the physiological relevance of the PspFW56A mutation, since they indicate that PspA cannot act effectively as a negative regulator of the PspFW56A mutant in vivo.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 7. In vivo effect of PspA on PspF1-275W56A-dependent activation of the pspA promoter. E. coli strain MVA4 carrying a chromosomal fusion, pspA::lacZ, was transformed with compatible plasmids pPB9, carrying pspA under control of placUV5, and either pPB8-WT (A) or pPB8-W56A (B), carrying wild-type pspF and mutant pspFW56A, respectively, under control of pBAD. Overnight cultures were diluted 100-fold, and cultures were grown at 37°C in LB medium supplemented with 0.2% glucose (to minimize the leaky expression from the placUV5 and pBAD promoters). After 3 h, overexpression of PspA and PspF proteins were induced by adding 1 mM IPTG and 0.2% arabinose for 1 h, and ß-galactosidase activities were determined as described in Materials and Methods. The error bars indicate standard deviations.


arrow
DISCUSSION
 
PspA is the specific negative regulator of the transcriptional activator PspF of the psp operon of E. coli, a representative of the AAA activators of the {sigma}54-RNAP. The experiments described here were designed to identify the molecular determinants of the inhibitory interaction between PspA and PspF. This analysis depended to a large extent on the availability (i) of biochemically active partial PspA sequences, which had not previously been described, and (ii) of structural data on AAA activators of the {sigma}54-RNAP.

PspA helical domains involved in PspF inhibition. Protein structure prediction programs allowed us to divide the PspA protein into four {alpha}-helical domains, reflecting one probable structural organization of PspA. Our results showed that only two PspA fragments were biochemically active in vitro, PspA1-186and PspA1-110. PspA1-186 was as active as PspA for PspF binding and inhibition, demonstrating that the major PspF inhibitory determinants are contained within the three N-terminal {alpha}-helical domains of PspA. Interestingly, PspA1-186 seems to bind PspF1-275 with a greater affinity than PspA. Nevertheless, PspA1-186 displays a similar but not a higher activity than PspA in functional assays for inhition of PspF (i.e., the inhibition of the ATPase activity of PspF). We propose that differences seen in native PAGE assays arise from different conformations of PspF being differently sensitive to PspA, since the gel shift assay is a nonequilibrium binding assay, whereas the functional inhibition assays are equilibrium assays in which PspF can adopt a range of conformations during its ATPase cycle. The activity of PspA1-110 was weaker than that of PspA or PspA1-186 and could be stimulated by the addition in trans of PspA110-222. These data suggest that (i) the C-terminal part of PspA contains PspF inhibitory sequences (notably in the HD3) and/or some stabilizing elements for PspA-PspF complex formation and (ii) the N- and C-terminal parts of PspA can partially function as independent domains.

The use of a bacterial two-hybrid system confirmed our in vitro results and provided clear evidence for direct protein-protein interaction between PspA and PspF in vivo in E. coli. In addition, the strict correlations between the inhibitory activity of PspA or PspA fragments on PspF and complex formation between PspA or PspA fragments and PspF strongly suggest that PspA-mediated inhibition of PspF must occur through direct protein-protein interactions.

PspA is closely related to Vipp1, which is essential for the formation of the thylakoid membrane in cyanobacteria and chloroplasts. The {alpha}-helical domains of Vipp1 and PspA adopt very similar high-molecular-mass oligomeric structures (1, 25). It has been demonstrated for Vipp1 that oligomer formation is important for proper positioning at the inner envelope of chloroplasts and that it involves the interaction of the central {alpha}-helical domain common to PspA. Three-dimensional reconstruction data demonstrated that PspA also formed a higher-order oligomeric ring of 36 PspA molecules (25). Although the exact significance of higher-order oligomer formation is not known for PspA, it may be significant for binding and inhibiting PspF, either by preventing nucleotide access to the active site or by inhibiting formation of the correct oligomeric form (19, 25). Together, our findings suggest that the {alpha}-helical domains HD1 to -3 of PspA are required for multimerization of PspA and that the C-terminal region of PspA could help in stabilizing higher-order oligomer formation of PspA.

W56 residue of PspF. Since the PspFW56A mutant could not form a detectable complex with PspA and escaped PspA-mediated inhibition in vitro and in vivo, we propose that W56 of PspF is a binding determinant for PspA. Interestingly, W56 appears to lie at the periphery of the modeled PspF1-275 hexamer in the {alpha}/ß subdomain of the AAA core (Fig. 5). More striking is the fact that it is solvent exposed, thus making it directly available for any potential hydrophobic interaction. In agreement with W56 being a major determinant for PspA interaction, compilation and analysis of a database of alanine mutants of heterodimeric protein-protein complexes showed that tryptophan, arginine, and tyrosine residues are preferred in the high-energy interactions between proteins in a heterodimer (4).

We investigated the possibility that the in trans PspA-mediated inhibition of PspF could be related to the negative regulation of the activities of other more conventional {sigma}54 AAA activators by their in cis regulatory domains. We chose to compare PspF with A. aeolicus NtrC1, since the receiver domain of NtrC1 negatively controls the activity of its AAA domain and the crystal structures of the AAA domain and the adjacent receiver domain of NtrC1 have been determined (34). In principle, PspA could use a binding surface on PspF equivalent to that used by the receiver domain of NtrC1 to inhibit the functioning of the AAA domain of NtrC1. Although the residue equivalent to W56 in NtrC1 is not coincident to the surface that interacts with the receiver domain, the adjacent residue equivalent to R55 in NtrC1 is very close to where the receiver domain directly interacts, suggesting that the receiver domains of {sigma}54 AAA activators, such as NtrC1 and PspA, might use adjacent or possibly slightly overlapping surfaces. However, the mechanism of inhibition may well be different.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust project grant. S.E. was the recipient of a BBSRC postgraduate award. P.B. was supported by a BBSRC project grant.

We thank Goran Jovanovic, Antony Mayhew, and Louise Lloyd for useful comments on the manuscript. We thank Xiaodong Zhang for help with the mapping of W56 onto the PspF structural model. We thank D. Daines for the gift of the bacterial two-hybrid system, M. P. Castanié-Cornet for the gift of pAPT110, and J. Beckwith for the gift of pBAD18-Cm.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Imperial College London, Department of Biological Sciences, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 207 594 5442. Fax: 44 207 594 5419. E-mail: m.buck{at}imperial.ac.uk. Back

{dagger} Present address: MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom. Back

{ddagger} Present address: Nature Reviews Journals, Porters South, London N1 9XW, United Kingdom. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Aseeva, E., F. Ossenbuhl, L. A. Eichacker, G. Wanner, J. Soll, and U. C. Vothknecht. 2004. Complex formation of Vipp1 depends on its alpha-helical PspA-like domain. J. Biol. Chem. 279:35535-35541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Bates, P. A., L. A. Kelley, R. M. MacCallum, and M. J. E. Sternberg. 2001. Enhancement of protein modelling by human intervention in applying the automatic programs 3D-JIGSAW and 3D-PSSM. Proteins 5(Suppl.):39-46.
    3. 3
  3. Beloin, C., J. Valle, P. Latour-Lambert, P. Faure, M. Kzreminski, D. Balestrino, J. A. Haagensen, S. Molin, G. Prensier, B. Arbeille, and J.-M. Ghigo. 2004. Global impact of mature biofilm lifestyle on Escherichia coli K-12 gene expression. Mol. Microbiol. 51:659-674.[CrossRef][Medline]
    4. 4
  4. Bogan, A. A., and K. S. Thorn. 1998. Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 280:1-9.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Bordes, P., S. R. Wigneshweraraj, J. Schumacher, X. Zhang, M. Chaney, and M. Buck. 2003. The ATP hydrolyzing transcription activator phage shock protein F of Escherichia coli: identifying a surface that binds {sigma}54. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:2278-2283.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Brissette, J. L., M. Russel, L. Weiner, and P. Model. 1990. Phage shock protein, a stress protein of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:862-866.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    7. 7
  7. Brissette, J. L., M. Russel, L. Wiener, and P. Model. 1991. Characterisation and sequence of the Escherichia coli stress induced psp operon. J. Mol. Biol. 220:35-48.[CrossRef][Medline]
    8. 8
  8. Buck, M., M. T. Gallegos, D. J. Studholme, Y. Guo, and J. D. Gralla. 2000. The bacterial enhancer-dependent {sigma}54 ({sigma}N) transcription factor. J. Bacteriol. 182:4129-4136.[Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Cannon, W., M. T. Gallegos, and M. Buck. 2000. Isomerisation of a binary sigma-promoter DNA complex by transcription activators. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:594-600.[CrossRef][Medline]
    10. 10
  10. Cannon, W., M. T. Gallegos, P. Casaz, and M. Buck. 1999. Amino-terminal sequences of {sigma}N ({sigma}54) inhibit RNA polymerase isomerization. Genes Dev. 13:357-370.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Casadaban, M. J., and S. N. Cohen. 1980. Analysis of gene control signals by DNA fusion and cloning in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 138:179-207.[CrossRef][Medline]
    12. 12
  12. Chaney, M., R. Grande, S. R. Wigneshweraraj, W. Cannon, P. Casaz, M. T. Gallegos, J. Schumacher, S. Jones, S. Elderkin, A. E. Dago, E. Morett, and M. Buck. 2001. Binding of transcriptional activators to {sigma}54 in the presence of the transition state analog ADP-aluminumfluoride: insights into activator mechanochemical action. Genes Dev. 15:2282-2294.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Daines, D. A., and R. P. Silver. 2000. Evidence for multimerization of Neu proteins involved in polysialic acid synthesis in Escherichia coli K1 using improved LexA-based vectors. J. Bacteriol. 182:5267-5270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 14
  14. Darwin, A., and V. Miller. 2001. The psp locus of Yersinia enterocolitica is required for virulence and for growth in vitro when the Ysc type III secretion system is produced. Mol. Microbiol. 39:429-444.[CrossRef][Medline]
    15. 15
  15. Darwin, A., and V. Miller. 1999. Identification of Yersinia enterocolitica genes affecting survival in an animal host using signature-tagged transposon mutagenesis. Mol. Microbiol. 32:51-62.[CrossRef][Medline]
    16. 16
  16. DeLisa, M. P., P. Lee, T. Palmer, and G. Georgiou. 2004. Phage shock protein PspA of Escherichia coli relieves saturation of protein export via the Tat pathway. J. Bacteriol. 186:366-373.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    17. 17
  17. Dmitrova, M., G. Younes-Cauet, P. Oertel-Buchheit, D. Porte, M. Schnarr, and M. Granger-Schnarr. 1998. A new LexA-based genetic system for monitoring and analyzing protein heterodimerization in Escherichia coli. Mol. Gen. Genet. 257:205-212.[CrossRef][Medline]
    18. 18
  18. Dworkin, J., G. Jovanovic, and P. Model. 2000. The PspA protein of Escherichia coli is a negative regulator of {sigma}54-dependent transcription. J. Bacteriol. 182:311-319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    19. 19
  19. Elderkin, S., S. Jones, J. Schumacher, D. Studholme, and M. Buck. 2002. Mechanism of action of the Escherichia coli phage shock protein PspA in repression of the AAA family transcription factor PspF. J. Mol. Biol. 320:23-37.[CrossRef][Medline]
    20. 20
  20. Eriksson, S., S. Lucchini, A. Thompson, M. Rhen, and J. C. Hinton. 2003. Unravelling the biology of macrophage infection by gene expression profiling of intracellular Salmonella enterica. Mol. Microbiol. 47:103-118.[CrossRef][Medline]
    21. 21
  21. Gabel, C. V., and H. C. Berg. 2003. The speed of the flagellar rotary motor of Escherichia coli varies linearly with proton motive force. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:8748-8751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    22. 22
  22. Green, R. C., and A. J. Darwin. 2004. PspG, a new member of the Yersinia enterocolitica phage shock protein regulon. J. Bacteriol. 186:4910-4920.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    23. 23
  23. Guo, Y., C. M. Lew, and J. D. Gralla. 2000. Promoter opening by {sigma}54 and {sigma}70 RNA polymerases: {sigma} factor-directed alterations in the mechanism and tightness of control. Genes Dev. 14:2242-2255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    24. 24
  24. Guzman, L. M., D. Belin, M. J. Carson, and J. Beckwith. 1995. Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J. Bacteriol. 177:4121-4130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    25. 25
  25. Hankamer, B. D., S. L. Elderkin, M. Buck, and J. Nield. 2004. Organization of the AAA+ adaptor protein PspA is an oligomeric ring. J. Biol. Chem. 279:8862-8866.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    26. 26
  26. Ize, B., I. Porcelli, S. Lucchini, J. C. Hinton, B. C. Berks, and T. Palmer. 2004. Novel phenotypes of Escherichia coli tat mutants revealed by global gene expression and phenotypic analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 279:47543-47554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    27. 27
  27. Jones, S. E., L. J. Lloyd, K. K. Tan, and M. Buck. 2003. Secretion defects that activate the phage shock response of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 185:6707-6711.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    28. 28
  28. Jovanovic, G., L. Weiner, and P. Model. 1996. Identification, nucleotide sequence, and characterization of PspF, the transcriptional activator of the Escherichia coli stress-induced psp operon. J. Bacteriol. 178:1936-1945.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    29. 29
  29. Jovanovic, G., J. Rakonjac, and P. Model. 1999. In vivo and in vitro activities of the Escherichia coli sigma54 transcription activator, PspF, and its DNA-binding mutant, PspF{Delta}HTH. J. Mol. Biol. 285:469-483.[CrossRef][Medline]
    30. 30
  30. Kleerebezem, M., and J. Tommassen. 1993. Expression of the pspA gene stimulates efficient protein export in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 7:947-956.[CrossRef][Medline]
    31. 31
  31. Kleerebezem, M., W. Crielaard, and J. Tommassen. 1996. Involvement of the stress protein PspA (Phage shock protein A) of Escherichia coli in maintenance of the proton motive force under stress conditions. EMBO J. 15:162-171.[Medline]
    32. 32
  32. Kroll, D., K. Meierhoff, N. Bechtold, M. Kinoshita, S. Westphal, U. C. Vothknecht, J. Soll, and P. Westhoff. 2001. VIPP1, a nuclear gene of Arabidopsis thaliana essential for thylakoid membrane formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:4238-4242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    33. 33
  33. Lee, J. H., and T. R. Hoover. 1995. Protein crosslinking studies suggest that Rhizobium meliloti C4-dicarboxylic acid transport protein D, a sigma54-dependent transcriptional activator, interacts with sigma54 and the beta subunit of RNA polymerase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:9702-9706.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    34. 34
  34. Lee, S. Y., A. De La Torre, D. Yan, S. Kustu, B. T. Nixon, and D. E. Wemmer. 2003. Regulation of the transcriptional activator NtrC1: structural studies of the regulatory and AAA+ ATPase domains. Genes Dev. 17:2552-2563.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    35. 35
  35. Lloyd, L. J., S. E. Jones, G. Jovanovic, P. Gyaneshwar, M. D. Rolfe, A. Thompson, J. C. Hinton, and M. Buck. 2004. Identification of a new member of the phage shock protein response in Escherichia coli, the phage shock protein G (PspG). J. Biol. Chem. 279:55707-55714.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    36. 36
  36. Lupas, A., M. Van Dyke, and J. Stock. 1991. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science. 252:1162-1164.[Free Full Text]
    37. 37
  37. Lupas, A. 1996. Coiled coils: new structures and new functions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 21:375-382.[CrossRef][Medline]
    38. 38
  38. Maxson, M. E., and A. J. Darwin. 2004. Identification of inducers of the Yersinia enterocolitica phage shock protein system and comparison to the regulation of the RpoE and Cpx extracytoplasmic stress responses. J. Bacteriol. 186:4199-4208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    39. 39
  39. Miller, J. H. 1992. A short course in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
    40. 40
  40. Model, P., G. Jovanovic, and J. Dworkin. 1997. The Escherichia coli phage shock protein (psp) operon. Mol. Microbiol. 24:255-261.[CrossRef][Medline]
    41. 41
  41. Morris, L., W. Cannon, F. Claverie-Martin, S. Austin, and M. Buck. 1994. DNA distortion and nucleation of local DNA unwinding within sigma54 (sigmaN) holoenzyme closed promoter complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 269:11563-11571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    42. 42
  42. Neuwald, A., L. Aravind, J. L. Spouge, and E. V. Koonin. 1999. AAA+: a class of chaperone-like ATPase associated with the assembly, operation, and disassembly of protein complexes. Genome Res. 9:27-43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    43. 43
  43. Nishiyama, K., A. Fukuda, K. Morita, and H. Tokuda. 1999. Membrane deinsertion of SecA underlying proton motive force-dependent stimulation of protein translocation. EMBO J. 18:1049-1058.[CrossRef][Medline]
    44. 44
  44. Polard, P., and M. Chandler. 1995. An in vivo transposase-catalyzed single-stranded DNA circularization reaction. Genes Dev. 9:2846-2858.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    45. 45
  45. Rappas, M., J. Schumacher, F. Beuron, H. Niwa, P. Bordes, S. R. Wigneshweraraj, C. Keetch, C. Robinson, M. Buck, and X. Zhang. Unpublished data.
    46. 46
  46. Schumacher, J., X. Zhang, S. Jones, P. Bordes, and M. Buck. 2004. ATP-dependent transcriptional activation by bacterial PspF AAA+ protein. J. Mol. Biol. 338:863-875.[CrossRef][Medline]
    47. 47
  47. Studholme, D. J., and R. Dixon. 2003. Domain architectures of sigma54-dependent transcriptional activators. J. Bacteriol. 185:1757-1767.[Free Full Text]
    48. 48
  48. Wang, Q., J. G. Frye, M. McClelland, and R. M. Harshey. 2004. Gene expression patterns during swarming in Salmonella typhimurium: genes specific to surface growth and putative new motility and pathogenicity genes. Mol. Microbiol. 52:169-187.[CrossRef][Medline]
    49. 49
  49. Wang, Y. K., J. H. Lee, J. M. Brewer, and T. R. Hoover. 1997. A conserved region in the sigma54-dependent activator DctD is involved in both binding to RNA polymerase and coupling ATP hydrolysis to activation. Mol. Microbiol. 26:373-386.[CrossRef][Medline]
    50. 50
  50. Westphal, S., L. Heins, J. Soll, and U. C. Vothknecht. 2001. Vipp1 deletion mutant of Synechocystis: a connection between bacterial phage shock and thylakoid biogenesis? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:4243-4248.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    51. 51
  51. Xu, H., and T. R. Hoover. 2001. Transcriptional regulation at a distance in bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 4:138-144.[CrossRef][Medline]
    52. 52
  52. Zhang, X., A. Shaw, P. A. Bates, R. H. Newman, B. Gowen, E. Orlova, M. A. Gorman, H. Kondo, P. Dokurno, J. Lally, G. Leonard, H. Meyer, M. van Heel, and P. S. Freemont. 2000. Structure of the AAA ATPase p97. Mol. Cell 6:1473-1484.[CrossRef][Medline]
    53. 53
  53. Zhang, X., M. Chaney, S. R. Wigneshweraraj, J. Schumacher, P. Bordes, W. Cannon, and M. Buck. 2002. Mechanochemical ATPases and transcriptional activation. Mol. Microbiol. 45:895-903.[CrossRef][Medline]

Journal of Bacteriology, May 2005, p. 3238-3248, Vol. 187, No. 9
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.187.9.3238-3248.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Burrows, P. C., Joly, N., Nixon, B. T., Buck, M. (2009). Comparative analysis of activator-E{sigma}54 complexes formed with nucleotide-metal fluoride analogues. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 5138-5150 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pena-Sanchez, J., Poggio, S., Flores-Perez, U., Osorio, A., Domenzain, C., Dreyfus, G., Camarena, L. (2009). Identification of the binding site of the {sigma}54 hetero-oligomeric FleQ/FleT activator in the flagellar promoters of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Microbiology 155: 1669-1679 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jovanovic, G., Lloyd, L. J., Stumpf, M. P. H., Mayhew, A. J., Buck, M. (2006). Induction and Function of the Phage Shock Protein Extracytoplasmic Stress Response in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 21147-21161 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Maxson, M. E., Darwin, A. J. (2006). Multiple promoters control expression of the Yersinia enterocolitica phage-shock-protein A (pspA) operon.. Microbiology 152: 1001-1010 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Haas, W., Kaushal, D., Sublett, J., Obert, C., Tuomanen, E. I. (2005). Vancomycin Stress Response in a Sensitive and a Tolerant Strain of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Bacteriol. 187: 8205-8210 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elderkin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Buck, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elderkin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Buck, M.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»