JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larsen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kuipers, O. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larsen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kuipers, O. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, July 2006, p. 4978-4982, Vol. 188, No. 13
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00025-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

GlnR-Mediated Regulation of Nitrogen Metabolism in Lactococcus lactis

Rasmus Larsen ,{dagger},§ Tomas G. Kloosterman,{dagger} Jan Kok, and Oscar P. Kuipers*

Department of Molecular Genetics, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Kerklaan 30, 9751 NN Haren, The Netherlands

Received 9 January 2006/ Accepted 4 April 2006


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 
We show that the nitrogen regulatory protein GlnR of Lactococcus lactis represses transcription of the amtB-glnK, glnRA, and glnPQ operons. This likely occurs through a conserved DNA motif, 5'-TGTNA-7N-TNACAT-3', and takes place in response to extracellular glutamine and ammonium. GlnR-independent repression of amtB-glnK is mediated by the pleiotropic nitrogen regulator CodY.


    TEXT
 Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 
The lactic acid bacterium Lactococcus lactis has multiple amino acid auxotrophies (5, 6, 13). During growth in milk, it acquires free amino acids through degradation of extracellular proteins by a thoroughly characterized proteolytic system (15), which is controlled by the global regulator CodY (7, 8, 14). However, relatively little is known about central nitrogen regulation in lactic acid bacteria, which involves the amino acids glutamine and glutamate. In the gram-positive model organism Bacillus subtilis, the two transcriptional regulators TnrA and GlnR are important for the regulation of nitrogen metabolism (10). Although TnrA and GlnR recognize the same transcriptional operator sequence (TnrA/GlnR sites, 5'-T6TNA-7N-TNACAT-3'), TnrA acts both as an activator and a repressor of transcription when nitrogen is limiting (1, 10, 19, 22, 30, 31), whereas GlnR is active during conditions of nitrogen excess, repressing expression of the glutamine synthetase (glnRA) operon (4) and the urease (ureABC) operon (10, 29). The genome sequence of L. lactis subsp. lactis IL1403 does not encode a TnrA homologue, while GlnR is encoded in a putative glnRA operon (2). The presence of only one TnrA/GlnR homologue, as well as the different physiology and severe amino acid auxotrophy of L. lactis compared to B. subtilis, raises the question as to the role of GlnR in the nitrogen control of L. lactis.

To investigate the function of the putative transcriptional regulator GlnR in L. lactis, an in-frame marker-free deletion of glnR was constructed in strain MG1363 (12) essentially as described previously (18), yielding L. lactis MG{Delta}glnR (primer sequences are available upon request). By use of DNA microarrays, which were performed as described previously (8, 16, 27, 28), the transcription profile of this strain and MG1363 were compared in chemically defined medium (CDM) (20) with either a high (2%) or a low (0.1%) concentration of Casitone, a pancreatic digestion product of casein, as the nitrogen source. The most pronounced differences in gene expression between both strains were observed in 0.1% Casitone (Table 1). No additional differentially expressed genes were identified in 2% Casitone compared to 0.1% Casitone (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Transcriptome analysis comparing L. lactis MG1363 and MG{Delta}glnRa

 
Expression of glnA, encoding glutamine synthetase, and the putative ammonium transporter and sensor operon amtB-glnK were highly derepressed in L. lactis MG{Delta}glnR (Table 1). In addition, expression of the glutamine/glutamate ABC transporter gene glnP (23) was weakly yet significantly increased. Several genes involved in arginine biosynthesis (argC, argG, and gltS) and degradation (arcC2, arcA, and arcD1) were moderately down-regulated in the glnR mutant in 0.1% Casitone (Table 1). These changes in arginine metabolism could be caused by the disrupted metabolism of glutamine and glutamate, which serve as precursors of arginine synthesis.

Analysis of chromosomal transcriptional lacZ fusions to the glnRA, amtB-glnK, and glnPQ operons (primer sequences are available upon request), which were made using the integration plasmid pORI13 as described earlier (21), confirmed the DNA microarray results (Fig. 1). Interestingly, amtB-glnK expression was strongly derepressed only in 0.1% Casitone, indicating that this operon is also regulated independently of GlnR (Fig. 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Analysis of expression of glnRA, amtB-glnK, and glnPQ during growth of L. lactis. The wild-type strain MG1363 (squares) and its glnR derivative (triangles) carrying chromosomal glnRA::lacZ, amtB-glnK::lacZ, and glnPQ::lacZ fusions were grown in CDM containing 2% (A, C, E; closed symbols) and 0.1% (B, D, F; open symbols) Casitone (cas.). Growth (optical density at 600 nm [OD600]) is depicted with small symbols, and specific ß-galactosidase activity (Spec. activity) (in Miller units [MU]) is depicted with large symbols. These are representative graphs of several repeats.

 
Using the online tool MotifSampler (24, 25), two putative GlnR operator sites that showed high similarity to the GlnR operator of B. subtilis were identified in the amtB-glnK promoter (Fig. 2). In the glnRA promoter, a single putative GlnR box was found, and in the glnPQ promoter, a possible GlnR box is present at the start of glnP (Fig. 2). Promoter subcloning in the low-copy-number expression vector pILORI4 (primer sequences are available upon request) (17) revealed that the GlnR box upstream of the –35 region in the amtB-glnK promoter is essential for efficient GlnR-mediated repression (Fig. 3). Promoter fragments without the entire upstream GlnR box (PamtB-2 and PamtB-3) still retained weak (~1.5-fold) GlnR-mediated regulation, possibly originating from the remaining GlnR box that covers the –10 region of the core promoter (Fig. 3).


Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Locations of predicted GlnR boxes in the promoter regions of the amtB-glnK, glnRA, and glnPQ operons of L. lactis MG1363. GlnR box sequences are boxed, and the predicted CodY box is shaded. Numbers to the left of the sequences indicate positions relative to the first base of the translation start codon. –35, –10, and extended (ex) –10 sequences are shown on a black background. Ribosomal binding sites (RBS) are underlined. Italicized, bold nucleotides are parts of open reading frames. Stop codons of upstream genes are indicated by three asterisks.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Deletion analysis of the amtB-glnK promoter of L. lactis. The promoter region of amtB-glnK is drawn schematically, with GlnR boxes shown as white oval boxes, the CodY box shown as a gray oval, and –35 and –10 sequences shown as black rectangles. The extent of the promoter regions cloned upstream of lacZ in pILORI4 and the names of the respective promoter fragments are shown on the left below the map. ß-Galactosidase activities specified by the three constructs, measured in L. lactis MG1363 (MG) and MG{Delta}glnR ({Delta}glnR) grown to mid-exponential phase in CDM with 0.1% and 2% Casitone, are shown on the right. The ratios of the activities of MG{Delta}glnR over MG1363 and MG{Delta}codY ({Delta}codY) over MG1363 are shown in italics. Standard deviations calculated from three independent biological replicates are given in parentheses.

 
In addition to GlnR-mediated regulation of the amtB-glnK operon, strong Casitone-dependent regulation of this operon that was independent of GlnR was seen (Fig. 1C and D and 3). In a recent transcriptome analysis, amtB was shown to be twofold up-regulated in an L. lactis MG1363 codY deletion mutant (11) grown in the nitrogen-rich medium GM17 (M17 with 0.5% glucose [23a]). A CodY operator is indeed present in the amtB-glnK promoter (8), located downstream of the GlnR operator sites and the core promoter region (Fig. 2 and 3). In agreement, repression of the amtB-glnK promoter in 2% Casitone was relieved in L. lactis MG{Delta}codY (Fig. 3). This effect was also seen for the amtB-glnK promoter fragment PamtB-3, in which GlnR-mediated repression was almost entirely abolished due to deletion of the first GlnR box (Fig. 3). Thus, CodY is able to overrule the GlnR-mediated control of the amtB-glnK operon under nitrogen-rich conditions. The exact function of the amtB-glnK gene pair, which is conserved among many bacterial species (26), remains to be established in L. lactis, but the fact that it is regulated by both GlnR and CodY suggests that it has an important role in nitrogen control in this organism.

Glutamine synthetase enzymatically converts glutamate and ammonium into glutamine. Therefore, the effects of these compounds on the expression of glnRA, amtB-glnK, and glnPQ were investigated. Instead of using Casitone as the nitrogen source, a chemically defined medium that contained all amino acids except either glutamine or glutamate was used. To be able to examine the effect of ammonium in the medium, ammonium citrate, which is normally present in CDM, was replaced by sodium citrate. In CDM with a low concentration of glutamate, expression of glnRA was the same in L. lactis MG1363 and MG{Delta}glnR. However, expression was repressed approximately three- and fivefold in response to high extracellular concentrations of ammonium and glutamine, respectively, in a GlnR-dependent manner (Fig. 4A). Expression of amtB-glnK was likewise repressed by glutamine (5.7-fold) via GlnR (Fig. 4B), but ammonium had the strongest (9-fold) repressive effect (Fig. 4B). Remarkably, significant repression (3.5-fold) was still measured in strain MG{Delta}glnR (Fig. 4B), indicating that the amtB-glnK operon is also repressed by extracellular ammonium independently of GlnR. Since CodY was shown to repress expression of amtB-glnK depending on the Casitone concentration (Fig. 3), it may well be possible that CodY is responsible for this ammonium-induced repression, possibly via an ammonium-induced increase in the intracellular level of branched-chain amino acids, which are effectors of L. lactis CodY (7). Glutamine had no regulatory effect on glnPQ expression, but both ammonium and glutamate had an approximately twofold repressive effect (Fig. 4C). However, whereas the ammonium effect seemed to be mediated by GlnR, glutamate still repressed glnPQ expression in MG{Delta}glnR (Fig. 4C). Glycine, a feedback inhibitor of B. subtilis glutamine synthetase (9), had no measurable effect on GlnR-mediated regulation when added in a concentration of 5 mg/ml (data not shown), demonstrating that the effects seen with glutamate, ammonium, and glutamine are specific.


Figure 4
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Effects of glutamine, ammonium, and glutamate on the expression of (A) glnRA, (B) amtB-glnK, and (C) glnPQ as determined by single-copy, chromosomal lacZ fusions in L. lactis MG1363 (wild type) (black bars) and MG{Delta}glnR (hatched bars). Specific ß-galactosidase activity (Spec. ß-galactosidase act.) (in Miller units [MU]) is shown on the y axes. Cells were grown to mid-exponential phase in CDM with various concentrations (in milligrams/milliliter) (shown in parentheses) of glutamine (Gln), glutamate (Glu), and ammonium (NH4+) as indicated below the graphs. Standard deviations (error bars) were calculated on the basis of three independent biological replicates.

 
This work presents the first investigation into the transcriptional regulation by GlnR of central nitrogen metabolism in the low-G+C-content gram-positive model organism L. lactis. The limited number of targets of GlnR in both L. lactis and B. subtilis may suggest a functional similarity. The only common GlnR target in both organisms is the glnRA operon. The ureABC genes, which are regulated by GlnR in B. subtilis (3, 29) are not present in L. lactis, while the amtB-glnK operon and glnPQ genes (in the glnQHPM operon) are regulated by TnrA in B. subtilis (31). Thus, although there is similarity, L. lactis GlnR represents a mechanism of nitrogen control different from that of B. subtilis.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Anne de Jong, Aldert Zomer and Sacha A. F. T. van Hijum for expert advice during execution and analysis of DNA microarray experiments.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular Genetics, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Kerklaan 30, 9751 NN Haren, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-50-3632093. Fax: 31-50-3632348. E-mail: O.P.Kuipers{at}rug.nl. Back

{dagger} These authors contributed equally to this study. Back

§ Present address: Inflammation Group, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Apartado 14, 2781-901 Oeiras, Portugal. Back


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Text
 References
 

  1. Belitsky, B. R., L. V. Wray, Jr., S. H. Fisher, D. E. Bohannon, and A. L. Sonenshein. 2000. Role of TnrA in nitrogen source-dependent repression of Bacillus subtilis glutamate synthase gene expression. J. Bacteriol. 182:5939-5947.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bolotin, A., P. Wincker, S. Mauger, O. Jaillon, K. Malarme, J. Weissenbach, S. D. Ehrlich, and A. Sorokin. 2001. The complete genome sequence of the lactic acid bacterium Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis IL1403. Genome Res. 11:731-753.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Brandenburg, J. L., L. V. Wray, Jr., L. Beier, H. Jarmer, H. H. Saxild, and S. H. Fisher. 2002. Roles of PucR, GlnR, and TnrA in regulating expression of the Bacillus subtilis ure P3 promoter. J. Bacteriol. 184:6060-6064.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Brown, S. W., and A. L. Sonenshein. 1996. Autogenous regulation of the Bacillus subtilis glnRA operon. J. Bacteriol. 178:2450-2454.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Chopin, A. 1993. Organization and regulation of genes for amino acid biosynthesis in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 12:21-37.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Deguchi, Y., and T. Morishita. 1992. Nutritional requirements in multiple auxotrophic lactic acid bacteria: genetic lesions affecting amino acid biosynthesis pathways in Lactococcus lactis, Enterococcus faecium and Pediococcus acidilactici. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 56:913-918.[Medline]
  7. den Hengst, C. D., P. Curley, R. Larsen, G. Buist, A. Nauta, D. van Sinderen, O. P. Kuipers, and J. Kok. 2005. Probing direct interactions between CodY and the oppD promoter of Lactococcus lactis. J. Bacteriol. 187:512-521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. den Hengst, C. D., S. A. F. T. van Hijum, J. M. W. Geurts, A. Nauta, J. Kok, and O. P. Kuipers. 2005. The Lactococcus lactis CodY regulon: identification of a conserved cis-regulatory element. J. Biol. Chem. 280:34332-34342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Deuel, T. F., and S. Prusiner. 1974. Regulation of glutamine synthetase from Bacillus subtilis by divalent cations, feedback inhibitors, and L-glutamine. J. Biol. Chem. 249:257-264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Fisher, S. H. 1999. Regulation of nitrogen metabolism in Bacillus subtilis: vive la difference! Mol. Microbiol. 32:223-232.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Gajic, O. 2003. Relationship between MDR proteins, bacteriocin production and proteolysis in Lactococcus lactis. Ph.D. thesis. University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  12. Gasson, M. J. 1983. Plasmid complements of Streptococcus lactis NCDO 712 and other lactic streptococci after protoplast-induced curing. J. Bacteriol. 154:1-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Godon, J. J., C. Delorme, J. Bardowski, M. C. Chopin, S. D. Ehrlich, and P. Renault. 1993. Gene inactivation in Lactococcus lactis: branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis. J. Bacteriol. 175:4383-4390.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Guédon, E., P. Serror, S. D. Ehrlich, P. Renault, and C. Delorme. 2001. Pleiotropic transcriptional repressor CodY senses the intracellular pool of branched-chain amino acids in Lactococcus lactis. Mol. Microbiol. 40:1227-1239.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Kok, J., and G. Buist. 2003. Genetics of proteolysis in Lactococcus lactis, p. 189-223. In B. Wood (ed.), Genetics of lactic acid bacteria. Kluwer, New York, N.Y.
  16. Kuipers, O. P., A. de Jong, R. J. S. Baerends, S. A. F. T. van Hijum, A. L. Zomer, H. A. Karsens, C. D. den Hengst, N. E. Kramer, G. Buist, and J. Kok. 2002. Transcriptome analysis and related databases of Lactococcus lactis. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 82:113-122.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Larsen, R., G. Buist, O. P. Kuipers, and J. Kok. 2004. ArgR and AhrC are both required for regulation of arginine metabolism in Lactococcus lactis. J. Bacteriol. 186:1147-1157.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Leenhouts, K., G. Buist, A. Bolhuis, A. ten Berge, J. Kiel, I. Mierau, M. Dabrowska, G. Venema, and J. Kok. 1996. A general system for generating unlabelled gene replacements in bacterial chromosomes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 253:217-224.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Nakano, M. M., T. Hoffmann, Y. Zhu, and D. Jahn. 1998. Nitrogen and oxygen regulation of Bacillus subtilis nasDEF encoding NADH-dependent nitrite reductase by TnrA and ResDE. J. Bacteriol. 180:5344-5350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Poolman, B., and W. N. Konings. 1988. Relation of growth of Streptococcus lactis and Streptococcus cremoris to amino acid transport. J. Bacteriol. 170:700-707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Sanders, J. W., G. Venema, J. Kok, and K. Leenhouts. 1998. Identification of a sodium chloride-regulated promoter in Lactococcus lactis by single-copy chromosomal fusion with a reporter gene. Mol. Gen. Genet. 257:681-685.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Schultz, A. C., P. Nygaard, and H. H. Saxild. 2001. Functional analysis of 14 genes that constitute the purine catabolic pathway in Bacillus subtilis and evidence for a novel regulon controlled by the PucR transcription activator. J. Bacteriol. 183:3293-3302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Schuurman-Wolters, G. K., and B. Poolman. 2005. Substrate specificity and ionic regulation of GlnPQ from Lactococcus lactis. An ATP-binding cassette transporter with four extracytoplasmic substrate-binding domains. J. Biol. Chem. 280:23785-23790.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Ternagi, B. E. and W. E. Sandine. 1975. Improved medium for lactic streptococci and their bacteriophages. Appl. Microbiol. 29:807-813.[Medline]
  25. Thijs, G., M. Lescot, K. Marchal, S. Rombauts, B. de Moor, P. Rouze, and Y. Moreau. 2001. A higher-order background model improves the detection of promoter regulatory elements by Gibbs sampling. Bioinformatics 17:1113-1122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Thijs, G., K. Marchal, M. Lescot, S. Rombauts, B. de Moor, P. Rouze, and Y. Moreau. 2002. A Gibbs sampling method to detect overrepresented motifs in the upstream regions of coexpressed genes. J. Comput. Biol. 9:447-464.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Thomas, G., G. Coutts, and M. Merrick. 2000. The glnKamtB operon: a conserved gene pair in prokaryotes. Trends Genet. 16:11-14.[Medline]
  28. van Hijum, S. A. F. T., A. de Jong, R. J. S. Baerends, H. A. Karsens, N. E. Kramer, R. Larsen, C. D. den Hengst, C. J. Albers, J. Kok, and O. P. Kuipers. 2005. A generally applicable validation scheme for the assessment of factors involved in reproducibility and quality of DNA-microarray data. BMC Genomics 6:77.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. van Hijum, S. A. F. T., J. Garcia de la Nava, O. Trelles, J. Kok, and O. P. Kuipers. 2003. MicroPrep: a cDNA microarray data pre-processing framework. Appl. Bioinformatics 2:241-244.[Medline]
  30. Wray, L. V., Jr., A. E. Ferson, and S. H. Fisher. 1997. Expression of the Bacillus subtilis ureABC operon is controlled by multiple regulatory factors including CodY, GlnR, TnrA, and Spo0H. J. Bacteriol. 179:5494-5501.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Wray, L. V., Jr., A. E. Ferson, K. Rohrer, and S. H. Fisher. 1996. TnrA, a transcription factor required for global nitrogen regulation in Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:8841-8845.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Yoshida, K., H. Yamaguchi, M. Kinehara, Y. Ohki, Y. Nakaura, and Y. Fujita. 2003. Identification of additional TnrA-regulated genes of Bacillus subtilis associated with a TnrA box. Mol. Microbiol. 49:157-165.[CrossRef][Medline]


Journal of Bacteriology, July 2006, p. 4978-4982, Vol. 188, No. 13
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00025-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larsen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kuipers, O. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larsen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kuipers, O. P.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS