Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Supplemental material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Paul, K. Articles by Blair, D. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Paul, K. Articles by Blair, D. F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, July 2006, p. 5240-5248, Vol. 188, No. 14
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00110-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Mutational Analysis of the Flagellar Rotor Protein FliN: Identification of Surfaces Important for Flagellar Assembly and Switching

Koushik Paul,¹ Jacob G. Harmon,² and David F. Blair^1*

Departments of Biology,¹ Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112²

Received 20 January 2006/ Accepted 9 May 2006

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
FliN is a component of the flagellar switch complex in many bacterial species. The crystal structure is known for most of FliN, and a targeted cross-linking study (K. Paul and D. F. Blair, J. Bacteriol. 188:2502-2511, 2006) showed that it is organized in ring-shaped tetramers at the bottom of the basal body C ring. FliN is essential for flagellar assembly and direction switching, but its precise functions have not been defined. Here, we identify functionally important regions on FliN by systematic mutagenesis. Nonconservative mutations were made at positions sampling the surface of the protein, and the effects on flagellar assembly and function were measured. Flagellar assembly was disrupted by mutations in a conserved hydrophobic patch centered on the dimer twofold axis or by mutations on the surface that forms the dimer-dimer interface in the tetramer. The assembly defect in hydrophobic-patch mutants was partially rescued by overexpression of the flagellar export proteins FliH and FliI, and coprecipitation assays demonstrated a binding interaction between FliN and FliH that was weakened by mutations in the hydrophobic patch. Thus, FliN might contribute to export by providing binding sites for FliH or FliH-containing complexes. The region around the hydrophobic patch is also important for switching; certain mutations in or near the patch caused a smooth-swimming chemotaxis defect that in most cases could be partially rescued by overexpression of the clockwise-signaling protein CheY. The results indicate that FliN is more closely involved in switching than has been supposed, possibly contributing to the binding site for CheY on the switch.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Bacterial flagella are assembled in a precisely choreographed process that involves more than 25 proteins (Fig. 1) (16, 23). The membrane-embedded MS ring is formed first, from about 25 copies of the FliF protein. This is followed by assembly of the C ring onto the cytoplasmic face of the MS ring and of the flagellar export apparatus in the membrane within the MS ring (12, 17, 32, 42). This apparatus transports the protein subunits that form the exterior structures (the rod, hook, and filament) into a central channel in the flagellum, through which they move to their sites of assembly (14, 24). Once the export apparatus is assembled and functioning, these exterior structures are added in a proximal-to-distal sequence (Fig. 1) (17, 23, 34, 35). The flagellar export apparatus is related to the type III secretion systems that function in export of virulence factors in many bacterial pathogens (1).

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. (Top) Sequence of events in flagellar assembly. For simplicity, only the major stages in assembly are shown. Proteins that form the axial structures exterior to the cytoplasmic membrane (the rod, hook, and filament) are actively transported into the central channel of the flagellum by an export apparatus at the base. Protein components of the export apparatus are indicated. FliJ is believed to be the chaperone for rod and hook proteins; FlgN, FliS, and FliT are chaperones for more distal components. The outer membrane (OM), peptidoglycan layer (PG), and inner membrane (IM) are indicated. (Bottom) Approximate locations of rotor and stator proteins in the basal body. Although FliN is believed to have a role in export, it is located in the lower (membrane-distal) part of the C ring.

The C ring is formed from the proteins FliG, FliM, and FliN, each present in many copies (approximate stoichiometries are 25 FliG, 35 FliM, and >100 FliN) (5, 33, 39, 47, 48). The FliG-FliM-FliN complex is essential for flagellar assembly, rotation, and clockwise/counterclockwise (CW/CCW) switching and is usually termed the switch complex (45, 46). FliG is involved most directly in rotation (10, 21) and is known to interact with the stator protein MotA (49) and the MS ring protein FliF (8, 15, 18, 29). Because MotA and FliF are membrane proteins, FliG must presumably be located in the upper (membrane-proximal) part of the C ring. FliM does not function as directly in torque generation (21) but has a large role in switching (31, 46) and contains a binding site for the CW-signaling protein phospho-CheY (CheY^P) (25, 41, 44). The precise function(s) of FliN has not been determined. It is the most abundant component in the C ring and is essential for both flagellar assembly and normal rotation: fliN null mutants are nonflagellate (36), while point mutants show either aberrant CW/CCW switching or subnormal rotation (10).

Vogler and coworkers found that temperature-sensitive fliN mutants are unable to grow flagellar filaments at the restrictive temperature and accordingly suggested that FliN may have a role in flagellar export (43). Consistent with this, homologs of FliN occur in a number of type III secretion systems that function to export virulence factors (and which are not thought to have any role in motility) (14, 24, 36). It is possible that FliN has only an indirect role in export, because it is needed for assembly of the C ring, which might in turn be necessary for assembly of the export apparatus. A more direct role in export seems likely, however, given the occurrence of FliN homologs in type III secretion systems. In the type III secretion systems of Yersinia pestis and Shigella flexneri, homologs of FliN were found to interact with homologs of the export protein FliH (11, 13). If the analogous interactions also occur in the flagellar system, this could explain the requirement for FliN in flagellar assembly.

Although some fliN point mutations are known to cause aberrantly CW or CCW motor bias, such switch bias mutations are less common in FliN than in FliM or FliG (10, 31). FliN might have a relatively small role in switching, or it might play an important role that involves only a small part of the protein. FliN has also been implicated in torque generation; certain fliN point mutations allow flagellar assembly but impair rotation (10). Mutants with this mot phenotype are not entirely defective in torque generation, because they were partially rescued by overexpression of the mutant FliN protein or by overexpression of FliM (21).

The crystal structure is known for most of FliN, and it shows a saddle-shaped dimer formed largely from ß-strands (3) (Protein Data Bank [PDB] accession numbers 1yab and 1o6a). Using analytical ultracentrifugation and targeted cross-linking, we showed that FliN is organized in tetramers with a ring-like shape (3, 30). We proposed (30) that the FliN tetramers are located at the bottom of the C ring, where electron microscopic reconstructions (6, 38) show a bulge with the appropriate shape and dimensions. En face views of the basal body show 34-fold subunit structure, with the number of subunits varying somewhat from specimen to specimen (39, 47). If FliN corresponds to the bulge at the bottom of the C ring as our evidence suggests, then the C ring should contain about this number of FliN tetramers.

Here, we have used the FliN crystal structure to guide a systematic mutational study of the protein. Mutations were made at many positions distributed over the surface of FliN, and the effects on flagellar assembly and function were measured. In support of the ring-shaped tetramer model, flagellar assembly and function were affected by mutations on the surface that is predicted to form the dimer-dimer interface. A conserved hydrophobic patch on FliN was found to be important for flagellar assembly and CW/CCW switching. Nonconservative mutations near the center of this patch prevented flagellar assembly, and this assembly defect was partially rescued by overexpression of the flagellar export proteins FliH and FliI. Copurification assays showed that FliH interacts with FliN through the hydrophobic patch. Thus, FliN might assist flagellar assembly by providing docking sites for FliH and associated proteins.

Mutations in a region adjoining the hydrophobic patch affected switching; cells assembled flagella but swam smoothly, indicating a CCW motor bias. The chemotaxis defect in most of these mutants was partially rescued by CheY overexpression. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of FliM for CW/CCW switching and of an N-terminal segment of FliM for binding to CheY (2, 19, 25, 41, 44). Our results indicate that regions of FliN are also critical for switching, either stabilizing the CW state of the switch or contributing to the binding site for CheY.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Strains, plasmids, and media. The Escherichia coli strains and plasmids used are listed in Table 1. LB, TB, and SB media were prepared as described previously (30, 37). LB medium was used for most culture growth and transformations, TB medium for assays of motility in liquid, and SB medium for high-level expression. Ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and kanamycin were used at 125 µg/ml, 50 µg/ml, and 50 µg/ml, respectively, in liquid media and at 50 µg/ml, 12.5 µg/ml, and 12.5 µg/ml, respectively, in swarm plates. Isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was prepared as a 0.1 M stock in water and used at the concentrations indicated in the figures.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. E. coli strains and plasmids used in this study

Mutagenesis and assays of mutant function. Single-stranded DNA preparation and site-directed mutagenesis were performed according to the Altered Sites procedure (Promega) with fliN cloned in plasmid pLS4 (21). The mutations were confirmed by sequencing, and then the mutated genes were cloned into plasmid pHT39 (36) to allow controlled expression of the mutant fliN genes from the tac promoter. Swarming in soft agar, swimming in liquid, and flagellation were measured as described previously (37), using the fliN deletion strain DFB223 (36) transformed with wild-type pHT39 or mutant variants of pHT39. Swarm plates contained TB, 0.27% Bacto Agar, appropriate antibiotics, and IPTG at various concentrations between 0 and 400 µM, giving FliN expression levels ranging from slightly below to well above the wild-type level (36). Flagella were stained using the wet mount procedure of Heimbrook et al. (9).

His-binding affinity chromatography. FliH with an N-terminal eight-His tag (His-FliH) was expressed from plasmid pKP59 in cells of the flhDC strain RP3098, a gift of J. S. Parkinson. The flhDC genes are required for expression of all other flagellar operons (20, 22), so this strain expresses no flagellar genes from the chromosome. Wild-type or mutant FliN was expressed from plasmid pHT39 (36) in strain RP3098. Cells were grown at 37°C in 500 ml of SB medium containing ampicillin to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.7 and then induced with 400 µM IPTG for 3 hours. Cells of the two cultures (one expressing His-FliH and the other expressing FliN or its mutant variants) were mixed, collected by centrifugation, and then resuspended in 20 ml of binding buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Cell were lysed by using a French pressure cell, and the lysate was centrifuged (23,000 x g, 45 min) to pellet the membranes. The supernatant was applied to a Ni ion affinity column (Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid agarose; QIAGEN), and the column was washed in the following buffers: 50 ml of binding buffer; 50 ml of elution buffer containing 20 mM imidazole; and then 30 ml each of elution buffers containing imidazole at concentrations of 50 mM, 100 mM, 200 mM, and 400 mM.

To analyze the fractions for FliN content, the samples were run on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels (12%) (mini gels), and then proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose using a semidry transfer apparatus (Bio-Rad Transferblot SD), as described previously (30). Rabbit polyclonal antibody against FliN was prepared as described previously (36) and was used at a 1,000-fold dilution. Bands were visualized using the Super Signal West Picoluminol system (Pierce) and X-ray film. Bands were quantified by video densitometry using the public domain image-processing program NIH Image (developed at the U.S. National Institutes of Health and available on the Internet at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/).

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The crystal structure is known for residues 68 to 154 of Thermotoga maritima FliN (3), corresponding to residues 51 to 137 of the E. coli protein. The present mutational analysis used the protein of E. coli. Nonconservative replacements were made at 30 positions on the protein surface (Fig. 2). Multiple replacements were made at some positions, and some of the Cys replacements made for the recent cross-linking study (30) were also included when they were the least conservative replacement available at a given position. The positions and phenotypes of the mutations are summarized in Table 2 and are displayed on the structure in Fig. 2. FliN forms a stable tetramer (3) with the shape of a doughnut (30). Such a doughnut shape is observed in one of the FliN crystal structures (PDB accession number 1yab) (3), and we adopted this as a structural framework for interpreting the mutations.

View larger version (53K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. (Top) FliN mutant phenotypes mapped onto the structure. The ring-shaped tetramer observed in the crystal structure (PDB accession number 1yab) is shown. Dashed lines in the left panel indicate dimer-dimer interfaces; the dashed oval in the right panel indicates the hydrophobic patch. Cross-linking results (30) indicate that this or a generally similar arrangement is also relevant for the flagellum. Nonconservative mutations were made in the E. coli protein at the positions indicated. Mutations are colored according to phenotype as follows: black, nonflagellate; magenta, flagellate but practically immotile; yellow, motile but aberrantly smoothly swimming and impaired in swarming; gray, swarms at approximately one-third of the wild-type rate but requires unusually high expression level for function; blue, swarming at 50% of the wild-type rate or better. For positions where multiple replacements were studied, the most severe phenotype is shown. For additional details of the mutant phenotypes, see Table 2 and Fig. 5. (Bottom) Alignment of the FliN sequences from E. coli (E.c.) and T. maritima (T.m.), for the part of the protein that was observed in the T. maritima crystal structure. Mutant phenotypes are indicated on the E. coli sequence, using the same colors as in the top panels.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. FliN mutations and their phenotypes

Most regions on the surface of FliN are evidently not critical for flagellar assembly or function: The mutational replacements at most positions (19 of 30) allowed swarming at 50% or better of the wild-type rate (Table 2 and Fig. 2). Mutations that strongly disrupted FliN function clustered in particular regions on the protein, as detailed below.

Mutations that affect assembly. Two mutations (V111D and V112D) prevented flagellar assembly, and two others (R70D and V113D) caused cells to assemble fewer flagella than normal (typically one or two). The V111D, V112D, and V113D mutations are in the hydrophobic patch. The R70D mutation, which exhibited a milder defect than the others in swarming assays, falls on a different surface (Fig. 2).

Vogler et al. (43) reported that FliN temperature-sensitive mutants are unable to regrow flagellar filaments at the restrictive temperature, indicating a role for FliN in flagellar export. In a report describing the FliN structure, we noted that the hydrophobic patch is a conserved feature of FliN and suggested that it might provide docking sites for export substrate or for substrate-chaperone complexes (3). Interactions have previously been demonstrated between homologs of FliN and homologs of the export protein FliH in the type III secretion systems of Y. pestis (11) and S. flexneri (13). FliH is an export-related protein that binds and regulates FliI, the ATPase that provides energy for flagellar export (4, 27). FliH also interacts with FliJ, a chaperone for certain flagellar export substrates (26). To test for a possible role of the hydrophobic patch in binding FliH or other export proteins, we examined the effects of overexpressing FliH, FliI, and FliJ, together or in various subsets, in the fliN mutants. The mutants defective in motility or switching were not helped by overexpression of all three proteins (FliH, FliI, and FliJ). By contrast, the nonflagellate hydrophobic-patch V111D and V112D mutants showed a detectable improvement in swarming motility (Fig. 3). Experiments using subsets of the proteins showed that both FliH and FliI were necessary for the enhanced swarming, but FliJ was not (Fig. 3). Two other chaperones of flagellar export, FliS and FliT, were also tested, together with the flagellar cap protein FliD whose gene is in the same operon. FliS, FliT, and FliD together did not rescue the nonflagellate mutants and did not augment the effects of FliH and FliI (Fig. 3).

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 3. Effects of overexpression of flagellar and chemotaxis proteins in the FliN mutant strains. Cells of strain DFB223 (fliN) were transformed with a plasmid encoding the indicated mutant variant of FliN (or wild-type FliN as a control) and an additional plasmid(s) to direct overexpression of the indicated proteins (Y, CheY; H, I, J, D, S, and T, FliH, FliI, FliJ, FliD, FliS, and FliT, respectively; cont, control). IPTG (10 µM) was used to induce expression of fliN; other fli genes were expressed from the salicylate promoter, using induction with 10 µM sodium salicylate. The cheY gene was expressed from the arabinose promoter; the plates shown contained 1 mM arabinose. Fresh transformants were picked and transferred to plates containing tryptone and 0.27% agar, and the plates were incubated at 32°C for 24 h. The D116K mutant was aberrantly smoothly swimming but retained some chemotactic ability; the effects of CheY overexpression (CheY o/p) in this mutant are shown in the bar graph. This experiment used 0.5 mM arabinose to induce CheY overexpression. Error bars indicate the standard deviations for three measurements. w.t., wild type.

The FliH/FliI overexpression effect suggests that the hydrophobic patch might assist assembly by interacting with FliH and/or FliI. To look more directly for binding interactions, we used a copurification assay. Cells expressing His-tagged FliH and cells expressing wild-type or mutant FliN were mixed, lysed, and Ni- nitrilotriacetic acid beads were used to isolate His-FliH and associated proteins. Immunoblots were used to detect FliN in the partially purified material. Wild-type FliN was coisolated with His-FliH at a readily detectable level. FliN proteins with the hydrophobic-patch mutations V111D and V112D were coisolated at much lower levels (Fig. 4). By contrast, the FliH-FliN interaction was not greatly weakened by the I60D mutation in the hypothesized dimer-dimer interface or by the CCW-bias mutation A93D, V113D, or V114D (Fig. 4). The FliN-FliH interaction did not require any other flagellar proteins, because the coisolation experiments used a flhDC strain that expresses no flagellar genes from the chromosome.

View larger version (26K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 4. Copurification of FliN with His-FliH and effects of FliN mutations. His-FliH and FliN (or its mutant variants) were expressed in cells of strain RP3087 (flhDC). Cell lysates were loaded on a Ni affinity column, and the column was washed with increasing concentrations of imidazole. Samples prior to loading on the column are shown at the top, the flowthrough fractions are shown in the middle, and fractions eluted with 50 mM imidazole are at the bottom. "FliN only" indicates a negative control in which the cells expressed wild-type FliN but no His-tagged FliH. w.t., wild type.

Mutations giving immotile but flagellated (mot) phenotype. The I57D and I60D mutants were flagellate but practically immotile, with only one cell in thousands showing weak motility when observed in the microscope. Residues 57 and 60 are on the hypothesized dimer-dimer interface (Fig. 2). A previous mutational study in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (10) yielded three other FliN mot mutations near the dimer-dimer interface in residues 61, 75 and 78 (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Those mutations conferred an immotile phenotype at normal expression levels (10) but showed some swarming when FliM was overexpressed (21). To determine whether the I57D and I60D mutants behaved similarly, we introduced a second plasmid that expressed wild-type FliM. When FliM was overexpressed in the cells, the swarming rates of both mutants improved to about 25% of the wild-type rate, and in the microscope many cells were observed to swim (Table 2; swarm plates not shown).

Mutations that affect switching. Several fliN mutations caused cells to swim smoothly, indicating an aberrantly CCW motor bias. In some cases, the nonchemotactic mutants also produced fewer flagella than normal (Table 2), but all were capable of vigorous swimming. Most of the CCW-bias mutations occurred on the margins of the hydrophobic patch (Fig. 2). An asparagine replacement of the hydrophobic-patch residue Val111 also gave a CCW-bias phenotype, in contrast to the aspartate replacement at this position which, as noted above, prevented assembly. A smooth-swimming, nonchemotactic phenotype was also observed for one mutation near the center of the hydrophobic patch (L68C), a Cys replacement made originally for the targeted cross-linking study (30). Residue 68 is largely buried, so this mutation might perturb the overall protein conformation rather than directly altering a surface important for switching.

Because the nonchemotactic mutants showed an aberrantly CCW motor bias, we next tested the effects of overexpressing the CW-signaling protein CheY in the fliN mutants. As expected, the nonflagellate mutants and the immotile mutants were not helped by overexpression of CheY. Three of the motile, nonchemotactic mutants (A93D, V113D, and V114D mutants) showed markedly improved swarming when CheY was overexpressed (Fig. 3). Two other CCW mutants, V111N and L68C mutants, showed no improvement.

Mutations with altered dependence on FliN level. Several FliN mutations allowed swarming at rates comparable to that of the wild type, but at expression levels different from the optimum for the wild-type protein. Data for nine such mutations are shown in Fig. 5. In most cases, a higher level of induction was needed for optimal swarming, and swarming at very high levels of expression was better than that of cells overexpressing wild-type FliN. In two cases, the optimal level of expression was unchanged from the level for the wild type (induction with 10 µM IPTG), but overexpression caused stronger impairment than usual. One position (Val86) showed one or the other of these two behaviors, depending upon the replacement. Sequence alignments show that residue 86 is strongly conserved as hydrophobic, in spite of its surface location. The positions showing a requirement for increased FliN expression are marked on the structure in Fig. 6 (excluding position 56, which is near the dimer-dimer interface and might therefore affect tetramer stability). Several such mutations (at positions 72, 77, 86, 115, and 121) fall on the surface of FliN in the general vicinity of Val86 (alpha-carbons within 15 Å of Val-86 alpha carbon). One (at position 134) falls on a distinct surface in a region of the protein that also contains several Salmonella mutations that conferred the mot phenotype (also indicated in Fig. 6).

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 5. Mutations that alter the dependence of swarming rate upon expression level of FliN. Swarming rates versus induction levels are shown for the mutants that allowed close to wild-type function at some expression level. Wild-type (w.t.) controls are shown for comparison. Variability in wild-type swarming rates reflects experimental variations in agar concentration, which did not alter the IPTG dependence of either the wild type or the mutants.

View larger version (71K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 6. Positions that show a requirement for increased expression of FliN, mapped onto the structure. Positions showing altered level dependence are colored gray. Numbers (which are for the E. coli protein) are given for positions in the upper half of the tetramer, and symmetry-related positions in the lower half are colored but not numbered. The L56D mutation is also in this category but is not pictured because it is near the dimer-dimer interface. The positions of four mutations that conferred the mot phenotype in a screen of spontaneous mutants of Salmonella (10, 21) and that are not in the region of the dimer-dimer interface are also shown, in magenta. The function of these mutants was also improved by overexpression of either the mutant FliN or FliM (21). (See Fig. S1 in the supplemental material for locations of other mot mutations that occur near the dimer-dimer interface.) The hydrophobic patch is shown for reference in green; this patch is formed from the side chains of residues 68, 93, 111, 113, and 118 (see also reference 3).

Dominance. To measure dominance of the swarming-defective FliN mutations, plasmids expressing the FliN variants with swarming rates less than 50% of normal were transformed into wild-type cells, and swarming rates were measured at various levels of induction. Most of the mutant FliN proteins impaired swarming of wild-type cells to some extent. Dominance was strongest for the mutations that give CCW motor bias (V111N, L68C, A93D, V113D, and V114D) (Fig. 7).

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 7. Dominance of the fliN mutations. Plasmids encoding the mutant variants of FliN were introduced into wild-type cells, and swarming was measured in the presence of 10 µM IPTG, which induces FliN expression at approximately wild-type levels. The control was the wild-type strain transformed with the plasmid expressing wild-type FliN. Expression of the wild-type protein in wild-type cells causes a slight impairment in swarming; the rates for the wild-type control strain are shown both for 10 µM IPTG (which should be compared with the mutants) and for no IPTG (wt/10 and wt/0, respectively).

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Most of the FliN mutations did not substantially affect flagellar assembly or function, identifying sizable regions of the protein that are unlikely to engage in critical, nonredundant interactions. Functionally critical regions of FliN include the hydrophobic patch and its immediate surroundings and the dimer-dimer interface containing residues 57 and 60 (Fig. 2).

We hypothesized previously that the hydrophobic patch on FliN might assist flagellar assembly by binding to protein complexes involved in export (3). Support for this idea comes from studies demonstrating an interaction between FliN homologs and FliH homologs in the type III secretion apparatus of Y. pestis (11) and S. flexneri (13). The FliH/FliI overexpression experiment (Fig. 3) gives some indication that a FliN-FliH interaction occurs and is functionally important. The pull-down experiment provides more direct evidence for the FliN-FliH interaction and implicates the hydrophobic patch in particular (Fig. 4). A similar conclusion regarding the FliN-FliH interaction was reached in a recent study by Gonzales-Pedrajo et al. (7), also using pull-down assays.

The precise function of the FliN-FliH interaction in flagellar export is not yet known. Export might be facilitated by localization of substrate-chaperone complexes; Thomas and coworkers (40) showed that substrate-chaperone complexes can be localized to the membrane through their interaction with FliI. The FliN-FliH interaction may increase the rate of substrate delivery by targeting FliH-containing complexes to the vicinity of the export apparatus. Alternatively, FliN might influence export steps more directly, for example by modulating the stability or ATP hydrolysis activity of the FliH-FliI complex.

The doughnut model for FliN organization is based on a targeted cross-linking study that identified the surface of FliN-FliN contact within the tetramer (30). The mutational data support this model for the tetramer; both the I57D and I60D replacements on the hypothesized dimer-dimer interface caused severe motility impairments. The I57D and I60D mutants showed improved swarming when FliM was overexpressed. This was also true of three mot mutants of Salmonella that map in the region of the dimer-dimer interface (10, 21) (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). This rescue by overexpression prompted us to suggest previously that the mot mutants of FliN are defective in some aspect of switch-complex assembly, rather than in torque generation per se (10, 21). The structural model for the FliN tetramer allows a more specific interpretation; the mot mutations near the dimer-dimer interface most likely destabilize the tetramer or alter its shape so that assembly is disfavored. If FliM and FliN act cooperatively in assembly of the C ring, as a number of studies suggest (25, 29, 41), then overexpression of FliM might partially offset the effects of FliN mutations that destabilize or distort the tetramer.

Although we cannot yet specify the exact site(s) of FliM binding on the surface of FliN, the mutational data from this and previous studies (10, 21) provide clues to the region(s) that might be involved. Weakened binding to FliM might be expected to increase the level of FliN needed for optimal motility. This behavior was seen in several of the mutants characterized here, most of which fall on the face containing the well-conserved residue Val86 (Fig. 6). Mutations in Val86 altered the dependence on the FliN level in different ways, depending on the replacement. This surface is a likely candidate for interaction with FliM. Other parts of FliN might also contact FliM. One mutation showing altered level dependence (R134D) occurs in a different region, near four mutations that gave immotile phenotype in Salmonella (10, 21) (Fig. 6). Binding at two sites on FliN would enable FliM to bridge between adjacent FliN tetramers, an arrangement that would stabilize the C ring and that could account for the cooperative action of FliM and FliN in forming the ring.

Switch bias mutations were known to occur in FliN but at a lower frequency than in FliM or FliG (10, 31). This could indicate that FliN has a relatively small role in switching or, alternatively, that just a small region of the protein is involved. In light of the FliN structure and the present mutational data, we suggest that FliN has a crucial role in switching and that this involves a region on the margin of the hydrophobic patch. Three site-directed mutations in this region gave a strong CCW motor bias (Fig. 2), and most (three out of five) of the spontaneous switch bias mutations in Salmonella also map in this vicinity (positions 94, 110, and 111) (10). The chemotaxis defect in several of the CCW mutants was substantially rescued by overexpression of CheY, the signaling protein that, when phosphorylated, interacts with the motor to promote CW rotation (Fig. 3). CheY^P is known to bind to a segment near the amino terminus of FliM (2, 19, 41). Our results would be accounted for if CheY^P binds to FliN also, at a site near the hydrophobic patch. A CheY-FliN interaction has so far not been detected but does not appear to be ruled out by experiments carried out to date. An alternative possibility is that FliN mutations alter the intrinsic bias of the motor (i.e., the relative stabilities of the CCW and CW states). Further experiments are needed to distinguish these possibilities. In either case, the present results highlight the importance of FliN for CW/CCW switching and are consistent with the previous structure-based proposal that switching might involve conformational changes within the FliN tetramer (30).

 
We thank Sandy Parkinson for strains and plasmids, Mark Duyvesteyn and Perry Brown for their assistance in the early stages of this work, Moises Terrazas for assistance with swarming rate measurements, JungHoon Yang for providing vector pJY5, and Jonathan McMurry and Bertha Gonzalez-Pedrejo for valuable discussions of their data in advance of publication.

This work was supported in part by grant 8R01-EB2041 from the U.S. National Institutes of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering and by grant R01-GM64664 from the U.S. National Institutes of General Medical Sciences. The Protein-DNA core facility at the University of Utah receives support from the National Cancer Institute (5P30 CA42014).

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112. Phone: (801) 585-3709. Fax: (801) 581-4668. E-mail: blair{at}bioscience.utah.edu.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1
1. Blocker, A., K. Komoriya, and S. Aizawa. 2003. Type III secretion systems and bacterial flagella: insights into their function from structural similarities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:3027-3030.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Bren, A., and M. Eisenbach. 1998. The N terminus of the flagellar switch protein, FliM, is the binding domain for the chemotactic response regulator, CheY. J. Mol. Biol. 278:507-514.[CrossRef][Medline]
3
3. Brown, P. N., M. A. A. Mathews, L. A. Joss, C. P. Hill, and D. F. Blair. 2005. Crystal structure of the flagellar rotor protein FliN from Thermotoga maritima. J. Bacteriol. 187:2890-2902.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Fan, F., and R. M. Macnab. 1996. Enzymatic characterization of FliI: an ATPase involved in flagellar assembly in Salmonella typhimurium. J. Biol. Chem. 271:31981-31988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Francis, N. R., V. M. Irikura, S. Yamaguchi, D. J. DeRosier, and R. M. Macnab. 1992. Localization of the Salmonella typhimurium flagellar switch protein FliG to the cytoplasmic M-ring face of the basal body. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:6304-6308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Francis, N. R., G. E. Sosinsky, D. Thomas, and D. J. DeRosier. 1994. Isolation, characterization and structure of bacterial flagellar motors containing the switch complex. J. Mol. Biol. 235:1261-1270.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
7. Gonzalez-Pedrajo, B., T. Minamino, M. Kihara and K. Namba. 2006. Interactions between C ring proteins and export apparatus components: a possible mechanism for facilitating type III protein export. Mol. Microbiol. 60:984-998.[CrossRef][Medline]
8
8. Grunenfelder, B., S. Gehrig, and U. Jenal. 2003. Role of the cytoplasmic C terminus of the FliF motor protein in flagellar assembly and rotation. J. Bacteriol. 185:1624-1633.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Heimbrook, M. E., W. L. L. Wang, and G. Campbell. 1986. Easily made flagella stains, abstr. R-22, p. 240. Abstr. 86th Annu. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 1986. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
10
10. Irikura, V. M., M. Kihara, S. Yamaguchi, H. Sockett, and R. M. Macnab. 1993. Salmonella typhimurium fliG and fliN mutations causing defects in assembly, rotation, and switching of the flagellar motor. J. Bacteriol. 175:802-810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11
11. Jackson, M. W., and G. V. Plano. 2000. Interactions between type III secretion apparatus components from Yersinia pestis detected using the yeast two-hybrid system. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 186:85-90.[CrossRef][Medline]
12
12. Jones, C. J., R. M. Macnab, H. Okino, and S.-I. Aizawa. 1990. Stoichiometric analysis of the flagellar hook-(basal body) complex of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Mol. Biol. 212:377-387.[CrossRef][Medline]
13
13. Jouihri, N., M. P. Sory, A. L. Page, P. Gounon, C. Parsot, and A. Allaoui. 2003. MxiK and MxiN interact with the Spa47 ATPase and are required for transit of the needle components MxiH and MxiI, but not of Ipa proteins, through the type III secretion apparatus of Shigella flexneri. Mol. Microbiol. 49:755-767.[CrossRef][Medline]
14
14. Journet, L., K. T. Hughes, and G. R. Cornelis. 2005. Type III secretion: a secretory pathway serving both motility and virulence. Mol. Membr. Biol. 22:41-50.[Medline]
15
15. Kihara, M., G. U. Miller, and R. M. Macnab. 2000. Deletion analysis of the flagellar switch protein FliG of Salmonella. J. Bacteriol. 182:3022-3028.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
16. Kojima, S., and D. F. Blair. 2004. The bacterial flagellar motor: structure and function of a complex molecular machine. Int. Rev. Cytol. 233:93-134.[Medline]
17
17. Kubori, T., N. Shimamoto, S. Yamaguchi, K. Namba, and S.-I. Aizawa. 1992. Morphological pathway of flagellar assembly in Salmonella typhimurium. J. Mol. Biol. 226:433-446.[CrossRef][Medline]
18
18. Kubori, T., S. Yamaguchi, and S.-I. Aizawa. 1997. Assembly of the switch complex onto the MS ring complex of Salmonella typhimurium does not require any other flagellar proteins. J. Bacteriol. 179:813-817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19
19. Lee, S.-Y., H. S. Cho, J. G. Pelton, D. Yan, R. K. Henderson, D. S. King, L.-S. Huang, S. Kustu, E. A. Berry, and D. E. Wemmer. 2001. Crystal structure of an activated response regulator bound to its target. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8:52-56.[CrossRef][Medline]
20
20. Liu, X., and P. Matsumura. 1994. The FlhD/FlhC complex, a transcriptional activator of the Escherichia coli flagellar class II operons. J. Bacteriol. 176:7345-7351.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21
21. Lloyd, S. A., H. Tang, X. Wang, S. Billings, and D. F. Blair. 1996. Torque generation in the flagellar motor of Escherichia coli: evidence of a direct role for FliG but not for FliM or FliN. J. Bacteriol. 178:223-231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22
22. Macnab, R. 1992. Genetics and biogenesis of bacterial flagella. Annu. Rev. Genet. 26:129-156.
23
23. Macnab, R. M. 2003. How bacteria assemble flagella. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57:77-100.[Medline]
24
24. Macnab, R. M. 2004. Type III flagellar protein export and flagellar assembly. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1694:207-217.[Medline]
25
25. Mathews, M. A. A., H. L. Tang, and D. F. Blair. 1998. Domain analysis of the FliM protein of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 180:5580-5590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26
26. Minamino, T., R. Chu, S. Yamaguchi, and R. M. Macnab. 2000. Role of FliJ in flagellar protein export in Salmonella. J. Bacteriol. 182:4207-4215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27
27. Minamino, T., and R. M. Macnab. 2000. FliH, a soluble component of the type III flagellar export apparatus of Salmonella, forms a complex with FliI and inhibits its ATPase activity. Mol. Microbiol. 37:1494-1503.[CrossRef][Medline]
28
28. Morrison, T. B., and J. S. Parkinson. 1994. Liberation of an interaction domain from the phosphotransfer region of CheA, a signaling kinase of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:5485-5489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29
29. Oosawa, K., T. Ueno, and S.-I. Aizawa. 1994. Overproduction of the bacterial flagellar switch proteins and their interactions with the MS ring complex in vitro. J. Bacteriol. 176:3683-3691.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30
30. Paul, K., and D. F. Blair. 2006. Organization of FliN subunits in the flagellar motor of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 188:2502-2511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31
31. Sockett, H., S. Yamaguchi, M. Kihara, V. M. Irikura, and R. M. Macnab. 1992. Molecular analysis of the flagellar switch protein FliM of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 174:793-806.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32
32. Sosinsky, G. E., N. R. Francis, D. J. DeRosier, J. S. Wall, M. N. Simon, and J. Hainfeld. 1992. Mass determination and estimation of subunit stoichiometry of the bacterial hook-basal body flagellar complex of Salmonella typhimurium by scanning transmission electron microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:4801-4805.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33
33. Suzuki, H., K. Yonekura, and K. Namba. 2004. Structure of the rotor of the bacterial flagellar motor revealed by electron cryo-microscopy and single-particle image analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 337:105-113.[CrossRef][Medline]
34
34. Suzuki, T., T. Iino, T. Horiguchi, and S. Yamaguchi. 1978. Incomplete flagellar structures in nonflagellate mutants of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 133:904-915.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35
35. Suzuki, T., and Y. Komeda. 1981. Incomplete flagellar structures in Escherichia coli mutants. J. Bacteriol. 145:1036-1041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36
36. Tang, H., S. Billings, X. Wang, L. Sharp, and D. F. Blair. 1995. Regulated underexpression and overexpression of the FliN protein of Escherichia coli and evidence for an interaction between FliN and FliM in the flagellar motor. J. Bacteriol. 177:3496-3503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37
37. Tang, H., and D. F. Blair. 1995. Regulated underexpression of the FliM protein of Escherichia coli and evidence for a location in the flagellar motor distinct from the MotA/MotB torque generators. J. Bacteriol. 177:3485-3495.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38
38. Thomas, D., D. G. Morgan, and D. J. DeRosier. 2001. Structures of bacterial flagellar motors from two FliF-FliG gene fusion mutants. J. Bacteriol. 183:6404-6412.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39
39. Thomas, D. R., D. G. Morgan, and D. J. DeRosier. 1999. Rotational symmetry of the C ring and a mechanism for the flagellar rotary motor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:10134-10139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40
40. Thomas, J., G. P. Stafford, and C. Hughes. 2004. Docking of cytosolic chaperone-substrate complexes at the membrane ATPase during flagellar type III protein export. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:3945-3950.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41
41. Toker, A. S., and R. M. Macnab. 1997. Distinct regions of bacterial flagellar switch protein FliM interact with FliG, FliN and CheY. J. Mol. Biol. 273:623-634.[CrossRef][Medline]
42
42. Ueno, T., K. Oosawa, and S.-I. Aizawa. 1992. M ring, S ring and proximal rod of the flagellar basal body of Salmonella typhimurium are composed of subunits of a single protein, FliF. J. Mol. Biol. 227:672-677.[CrossRef][Medline]
43
43. Vogler, A. P., M. Homma, V. M. Irikura, and R. M. Macnab. 1991. Salmonella typhimurium mutants defective in flagellar filament regrowth and sequence similarity of FliI to F₀F₁, vacuolar, and archaebacterial ATPase subunits. J. Bacteriol. 173:3564-3572.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44
44. Welch, M., K. Oosawa, S.-I. Aizawa, and M. Eisenbach. 1993. Phosphorylation-dependent binding of a signal molecule to the flagellar switch of bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:8787-8791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45
45. Yamaguchi, S., S.-I. Aizawa, M. Kihara, M. Isomura, C. J. Jones, and R. M. Macnab. 1986. Genetic evidence for a switching and energy-transducing complex in the flagellar motor of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 168:1172-1179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46
46. Yamaguchi, S., H. Fujita, A. Ishihara, S.-I. Aizawa, and R. M. Macnab. 1986. Subdivision of flagellar genes of Salmonella typhimurium into regions responsible for assembly, rotation, and switching. J. Bacteriol. 166:187-193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47
47. Young, H. S., H. Dang, Y. Lai, D. J. DeRosier, and S. Khan. 2003. Variable symmetry in Salmonella typhimurium flagellar motors. Biophys. J. 84:571-577.[Medline]
48
48. Zhao, R., N. Pathak, H. Jaffe, T. S. Reese, and S. Khan. 1996. FliN is a major structural protein of the C-ring in the Salmonella typhimurium flagellar basal body. J. Mol. Biol. 261:195-208.[CrossRef][Medline]
49
49. Zhou, J., S. A. Lloyd, and D. F. Blair. 1998. Electrostatic interactions between rotor and stator in the bacterial flagellar motor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:6436-6441.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

---

Journal of Bacteriology, July 2006, p. 5240-5248, Vol. 188, No. 14
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00110-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Lowenthal, A. C., Hill, M., Sycuro, L. K., Mehmood, K., Salama, N. R., Ottemann, K. M. (2009). Functional Analysis of the Helicobacter pylori Flagellar Switch Proteins. J. Bacteriol. 191: 7147-7156 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Konishi, M., Kanbe, M., McMurry, J. L., Aizawa, S.-I. (2009). Flagellar Formation in C-Ring-Defective Mutants by Overproduction of FliI, the ATPase Specific for Flagellar Type III Secretion. J. Bacteriol. 191: 6186-6191 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kojima, S., Furukawa, Y., Matsunami, H., Minamino, T., Namba, K. (2008). Characterization of the Periplasmic Domain of MotB and Implications for Its Role in the Stator Assembly of the Bacterial Flagellar Motor. J. Bacteriol. 190: 3314-3322 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Brown, P. N., Terrazas, M., Paul, K., Blair, D. F. (2007). Mutational Analysis of the Flagellar Protein FliG: Sites of Interaction with FliM and Implications for Organization of the Switch Complex. J. Bacteriol. 189: 305-312 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Supplemental material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Paul, K. Articles by Blair, D. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Paul, K. Articles by Blair, D. F.