Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, July 2006, p. 5266-5272, Vol. 188, No. 14
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01566-05
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
David Dauvillée,3,
Alejandro Miguel Viale,2
Francisco José Muñoz,1
Edurne Baroja-Fernández,1
María Teresa Morán-Zorzano,1
Gustavo Eydallin,1
Steven Ball,3* and
Javier Pozueta-Romero1*
Agrobioteknologiako Instituta, Nafarroako Unibertsitate Publikoa and Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Mutiloako etorbidea zenbaki gabe, 31192 Mutiloabeti, Nafarroa, Spain,1 Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario, Dpto. de Microbiología, Fac. de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Suipacha 531, 2000 Rosario, Argentina,2 UMR8576 CNRS, Université de Lille, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq, France3
Received 14 October 2005/ Accepted 7 May 2006
|
|
|---|
glgP) totally lacked glycogen phosphorylase activity, indicating that all the enzymatic activity is dependent upon the glgP product. Moderate increases of glycogen phosphorylase activity were accompanied by marked reductions of the intracellular glycogen levels in cells cultured in the presence of glucose. In turn, both glycogen content and rates of glycogen accumulation in
glgP cells were severalfold higher than those of wild-type cells. These defects correlated with the presence of longer external chains in the polysaccharide accumulated by
glgP cells. The overall results thus show that GlgP catalyzes glycogen breakdown and affects glycogen structure by removing glucose units from the polysaccharide outer chains in E. coli. |
|
|---|
-1,4-linked glucose subunits with
-1,6-linked glucose at the branching points. Synthesized by glycogen synthase (GlgA; EC 2.4.1.21) using ADP-glucose (ADPG) as the sugar donor molecule, the accumulation of this polyglucan occurs under conditions of limited growth in the presence of an excess carbon source (44). Regulation of glycogen biosynthesis in Escherichia coli involves a complex assemblage of factors that are adjusted to the physiological status of the cell. At the level of enzyme activity, for instance, the glycogen biosynthetic process is subjected to the regulation of ADPG synthesizing and cleaving enzymes, i.e., ADPG pyrophosphorylase (GlgC; EC 2.7.7.27) (5) and ADP-sugar pyrophosphatase (AspP; EC 3.6.1.21) (41), respectively. Moreover, depending on the carbon source, phosphoglucomutase (PGM; EC 2.7.5.1) has been shown to limit the glycogen biosynthetic process (1, 13). At the level of gene expression, the gluconeogenic process depends on the regulation of glgBX (coding, respectively, for the glycogen branching and debranching enzymes), glgS and glgCAP operons (34, 37, 44), the latter being regulated by cyclic AMP, GDP 3'-diphosphate, and the carbon storage regulator CsrA (3, 47, 54).
glgCAP encodes the two anabolic enzymes required for glycogen synthesis, GlgC and GlgA. Surprisingly at first glance, however, this operon also encodes the presumed catabolic enzyme glycogen phosphorylase (GlgP; EC 2.4.1.1) (46). This enzyme belongs to a structurally related and ubiquitous group of proteins that are generally regarded as glucan-degrading enzymes that catalyze the production of glucose-1-phosphate (G1P) by the reversible cleavage of
-1,4 bonds at the nonreducing ends of polyglucans, such as maltodextrins, starch, and glycogen (14, 20, 36).
The highly regulated muscle and liver glycogen phosphorylases are by far the best understood and most extensively studied members of the glucan phosphorylases group, their involvement in mammalian glycogen breakdown being well documented (6, 9, 10, 16, 40, 42). By contrast, despite the fact that plant glucan phosphorylases are assumed to be involved in generating G1P, some of them have been shown to play a pivotal role in processes such as tolerance to abiotic stress, flowering, and seed growth (28, 50, 52, 56). Despite intensive efforts, a case for a function of plant starch phosphorylases remains to be made.
In contrast to the case of mammalian glycogen phosphorylases, the role of the bacterial GlgP in glycogen metabolism is not well understood. Palmer et al. (43), for instance, suggested that GlgP does not play an important role in glycogen breakdown in E. coli. In clear contrast, and based on both its structural similarities with the mammalian counterpart and on the intracellular orthophosphate (Pi)-to-G1P ratio, bacterial GlgP has generally been suggested to recess the outer glycogen chains down to a length of four glucose residues from the branch point and, in combination with a debranching enzyme (GlgX), to participate in the slow degradation of glycogen during extended periods of substrate deprivation (4, 18, 21, 24, 38, 54, 55). The phenotype recently recorded for GlgX-defective E. coli mutants (24) is certainly consistent with this view. Nevertheless, the implication of bacterial GlgP in glycogen breakdown has never been formally demonstrated. Indeed, production and biochemical characterization of both glgP-less and -overexpressing cells are still lacking, and the role of GlgP in regulating glycogen breakdown must be considered as only imaginable and based on indirect evidence (4, 49). Significantly, Boss and coworkers have provided evidence that GlgP is involved in the production of maltodextrins acting as substrates and inducers for maltodextrin metabolism enzymes (12, 15, 25, 27, 29).
To gain insight into both functional and biological aspects of bacterial GlgP, we have characterized cells with altered glycogen phosphorylase activities. Results presented in this work demonstrate that GlgP catalyzes glycogen breakdown and affects glycogen structure by removing glucose units from the polysaccharide outer chains in E. coli.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
|
glgCAP and
glgP, respectively) were confirmed by both Southern hybridization and PCR using glgCAP- and glgP-specific primers, respectively. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Primer pairs for glgCAP and glgP disruptiona
|
The ca. 2.5-kb PCR product thus obtained was cloned in the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega) to create pG-glgP. glgP was subsequently cloned into either pET-15b (Novagen) or pBAD-18 (a pBAD/His derivative; Invitrogen) expression vectors (33), as illustrated in Fig. S1 and S2 in the supplemental material, to produce pET-glgP and pBAD-glgP, respectively. These plasmids were then used to transform cells by electroporation.
Production and purification of a recombinant GlgP. His-tagged GlgP was purified using BL21(DE3)C43 transformed with pET-glgP. Cells were grown in LB medium containing 0.1 mg/ml of ampicillin to an absorbance at 600 nm of about 0.6, and then 0.5 mM isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside was added to the culture medium. After 3 hours, the cells accumulated a protein whose size (ca. 90 kDa) was consistent with the predicted molecular mass (92.3 kDa) of the glgP gene product (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). One hundred milliliters of cultured cells was centrifuged at 6,000 x g for 10 min. The pelleted bacteria were resuspended in 4 ml of His-bind binding buffer (Novagen), sonicated, and centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 10 min. The supernatant thus obtained was subjected to His-bind chromatography (Novagen). The eluted protein was then rapidly desalted by ultrafiltration on a Centricon YM-10 filter (Amicon, Bedford, MA).
Enzyme assays. The following enzymes were assayed at 37°C according to the indicated references: GlgC (48), AspP (41), GlgA (35), and PGM (1). GlgP was assayed in the direction of glucan breakdown by using a two-step determination of G1P. In step one, the reaction mixture (50 µl) contained 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 30 mM Na-phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), glycogen (equivalent to 10 mM glucose), and protein extract. After 15 min of incubation, the reaction was stopped by boiling for 2 min. The G1P liberated was determined by using either one of the following methods.
(i) Assay A. Spectrophotometrically, assay A was conducted with a 300-µl mixture containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.0), 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 15 mM KCl, 0.6 mM NAD+, 1 U each of desalted PGM (P3397; Sigma) and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides (G8404; Sigma), and 30 µl of the mixture from the step one reaction. After 20 min of incubation, the NADH production was monitored at 340 nm by using a Multiskan EX spectrophotometer (Labsystems, Chicago, Ill.).
(ii) Assay B. Assay B entailed high-performance liquid chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection of G1P on a DX-500 Dionex system fitted to a Carbo-Pac PA10 column (4 by 250 mm) (7).
One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzes the production of 1 µmol of product per min.
Analytical procedures. Bacterial growth was determined spectrophotometrically by following the absorbance at 600 nm. Protein content was measured by the Bradford method using a Bio-Rad prepared reagent. Glycogen was extracted and measured as described by Romeo et al. (48). Iodine staining of colonies on solid Kornberg medium was performed using iodine vapor essentially as described in references 26 and 48.
CLDs of
glgP and WT glycogens.
Glycogens from wild-type (WT) and
glgP cells were purified as previously described (24). The purified polysaccharides were then subjected to enzymatic debranching by incubation overnight at 42°C in the presence of 20 U of isoamylase (Megazyme International Ireland Ltd.) from Klebsiella pneumoniae in 55 mM sodium acetate pH 3.5 buffer. The chain length distribution (CLD) of glycogen ß-limit dextrins was obtained with the same procedure except that the purified glycogens were subjected to ß-amylolysis prior to debranching. Two milligrams of purified glycogen was incubated with 17 U of ß-amylase from sweet potato (Sigma, St. Louis) overnight in 55 mM sodium acetate pH 4.6 buffer. The reaction was stopped by incubation of the samples during 5 min at 100°C. The ß-limit dextrins obtained were then dialyzed versus the same buffer but at pH 3.5.
The CLDs were then analyzed by fluorophore-assisted capillary electrophoresis (FACE). Glucans were first derivatized with 8-amino-1,3,6-pyrenetrisulfonic acid (APTS) according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). Briefly, 2 µl APTS in 15% acetic acid solution and 2 µl of 1 M NaBH3CN in tetrahydrofolate were added, and the coupling reaction was allowed overnight at 37°C in the dark. Separation and quantification of APTS-coupled glucans were carried out on a P/ACE system 5000 (Beckman Coulter) equipped with a laser-induced fluorescence system using a 4-mW argon ion laser. The excitation wavelength was 488 nm, and the fluorescence emitted at 520 nm was recorded on the Beckman P/ACE station software system (version 1.0). Uncoated fused silica capillaries of 57 cm length by 75-µm inner diameter were used. Running buffers were from Beckman Coulter. Samples were loaded into the capillaries by electroinjection at 10 kV for 10 s, and a voltage of 30 kV was applied for 30 min at a constant temperature of 25°C.
EM analyses. Electron microscopy (EM) was done as described by Bonafonte et al. (11). Cells entering the stationary phase of growth were prefixed with 4% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.3) for 2 h at 4°C, washed in 0.25 M sucrose, 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, and postfixed in 1% OsO4 in phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) at 4°C. After two washes with sodium Veronal (pH 7.4), the cells were embedded in 2% molten Noble agar. Sections were treated with 1% periodic acid and then with sodium chlorite. The gel was dehydrated and embedded in Epon-812, and ultrathin sections were placed on nickel grids, poststained for 30 min with uranyl acetate and for 15 min with lead citrate, and observed under a Zeiss EM 10CR electron microscope.
|
|
|---|
glgP- and glgP-overexpressing cells were produced as described in Materials and Methods and assayed for glycogen phosphorylase activity in the glycogen breakdown direction. WT cells showed readily measurable enzymatic activities (ca. 10 mU/mg protein). In clear contrast, glycogen phosphorylase activity was undetectable in the
glgP cells. In addition, glgP-overexpressing cells exhibited a ca. 20-fold increase of enzymatic activity compared to WT cells. The overall results thus show that most, if not all, glycogen phosphorylase activity in E. coli grown on glucose-containing medium is catalyzed by the glgP gene product. GlgP catalyzes glycogen breakdown in E. coli. To elucidate the biological function of GlgP, we compared the glycogen contents between WT cells and cells with altered glgP expression cultured in Kornberg medium supplemented with 50 mM glucose. Bacteria with altered glgP expression displayed a normal growth behavior compared with WT cells (not shown).
Iodine stain analyses on solid cultures (Fig. 1A) revealed that, whereas
glgCAP cells lacking the whole glycogen biosynthetic machinery (section 3) gave a negative stain compared with WT cells (section 1),
glgP cells (section 2) displayed a dark, brown iodine stain phenotype (22, 31, 39). We then performed time course measurements of the glycogen content in cells with altered glycogen phosphorylase activity cultured in liquid Kornberg medium supplemented with 50 mM glucose (Fig. 1B). These analyses showed that, as confirmed by EM analyses (Fig. 2),
glgCAP cells displayed a glycogen-less phenotype. In addition, and consistent with the results presented in Fig. 1, both glycogen amount and the rate of glycogen accumulation in
glgP cells were severalfold higher than those of their corresponding WT cells. The overall data thus show that (i) GlgP catalyzes glycogen breakdown in E. coli and (ii) in agreement with previous reports (8, 30, 32), bacterial cells can synthesize and mobilize glycogen simultaneously.
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. GlgP catalyzes E. coli glycogen breakdown in vivo. (A) Iodine staining of (1) WT, (2) glgP, and (3) glgCAP cells. Bacteria were cultured overnight in solid Kornberg medium supplemented with 50 mM glucose. (B) Time course analyses of the glycogen content in WT ( ), glgP ( ), and glgCAP ( ) cells cultured in liquid Kornberg medium supplemented with 50 mM glucose. The bacterial strain employed in this study was B/r. Essentially similar results were obtained with other bacterial strains.
|
![]() View larger version (84K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Glycogen accumulation in GlgP-overproducing cells and glgP and glgCAP E. coli mutants. Cells cultured in liquid Kornberg medium supplemented with 50 mM glucose were analyzed by EM. Upper left quadrant, WT cells transformed with the plasmid vector (pET-15b); upper right quadrant, GlgP-overproducing WT cells (pET-glgP); lower left quadrant, glgCAP mutants; lower right quadrant, glgP mutants. Arrows indicate the position of electron-transparent cytoplasmic glycogen granules resembling "holes" preferentially located at the periphery of E. coli cells (17). The bacterial strain employed in these studies was BL21(DE3)C43. Essentially similar results were obtained with other bacterial strains. Bars, 1 µm.
|
glgCAP cells at any stage of the culture (Fig. 3A), as also indicated by EM analyses (Fig. 2). Whether small increases in glycogen phosphorylase activity are accompanied by a reduction of glycogen levels was investigated by measuring glycogen contents in cells transformed with pBAD-glgP. These cells were cultured in liquid medium supplemented with 50 mM glucose, and glycogen phosphorylase activity was tuned by varying the concentration of arabinose in the culture medium. As shown in Fig. S4 in the supplemental material, both enzymatic activity and glycogen content in cells transformed with pBAD-18 remained nearly constant at any arabinose concentration. In clear contrast, glycogen phosphorylase activity in cells transformed with pBAD-glgP correlated well with arabinose concentration. Most importantly, intracellular glycogen content in cells transformed with pBAD-glgP showed a reverse correlation with respect to glycogen phosphorylase activity, and small increases of enzymatic activity were accompanied by a marked reduction of the glycogen content (Fig. 3B). The overall data thus show that GlgP exerts a very strong influence on the glycogen breakdown process.
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Increasing glycogen phosphorylase activity leads to a marked reduction of glycogen levels in E. coli. (A) Time course analyses of the glycogen content in cells transformed with either pET-15b ( ) or pET-glgP ( ) cultured in liquid M9 minimal medium supplemented with 50 mM glucose. (B) Glycogen phosphorylase activity-dependent glycogen content in cells transformed with pBAD-glgP cultured in liquid M9 minimal medium supplemented with 50 mM glucose. glgP expression was regulated by adding the arabinose concentrations indicated in Fig. S4 in the supplemental material. At the end of the exponential growth phase, cells were harvested and both glycogen content and glycogen phosphorylase activities were measured. The bacterial strain employed in this study was BL21(DE3)C43. Essentially similar results were obtained with other bacterial strains.
|
glgP cells. The results displayed in Fig. 4 clearly show an increase in chains corresponding to a DP of 13 to 30 glucose residues at the expense of chains of six, seven, and eight residues in
glgP cells, which is consistent with a function of GlgP in the degradation of the polysaccharide outer chains. These chains would then be elongated by GlgA without being removed by the missing phosphorylase, thereby leading to the observed CLD.
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Chain length distribution of glycogens, determined by FACE (see Materials and Methods). Isoamylase debranched glycogens from both WT and glgP cells were produced as described in Materials and Methods and separated up to DP 30. (A) CLDs expressed on a DP scale (x axis) are displayed as the percentage of total chains, expressed on a molar basis (y scale). (B) Difference plot generated by subtracting the mol% value of the WT at each chain length from the corresponding mol% of the mutant at the corresponding chain length. Dark bars correspond to WT cells, and light bars correspond to glgP cells. The bacterial strain used in this study was TG1. Essentially similar results were obtained with other bacterial strains.
|
glgP cells were subjected to digestion with ß-amylase, an exo type of hydrolase that produces ß-maltose by digesting the outer chains of glycogen, amylose, and amylopectin. This enzyme is unable to bypass or hydrolyze the
-1,6 linkages and therefore stops two, three, or four residues from the first
-1,6 branch encountered to generate the so-called ß-limit dextrin. If the dramatic differences seen in Fig. 4 were essentially confined to the outer chains of the polysaccharide, then the ß-limit dextrins obtained from glycogen from WT and
glgP cells would have similar CLDs. Results displayed in Fig. 5 clearly show that this is the case, thereby proving that GlgP catalyzes glycogen breakdown by removing glucose units from the polysaccharide outer chains in E. coli.
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. CLD of glycogen ß-limit dextrins determined by FACE. Isoamylase debranched glycogen ß-limit dextrins from both WT and glgP cells were produced as described in Materials and Methods and separated up to DP 20. Chains below DP 5 are not represented because of the very high background due to the presence of hyperabundant chains of DP 2 and 3 generated by the action of ß-amylase. Dark bars correspond to WT cells, and light bars correspond to glgP cells. The bacterial strain used in this study was TG1. Essentially similar results were obtained with other bacterial strains.
|
glgP- and glgP-overexpressing cells grown in the presence of glucose are due to changes in glycogen phosphorylase activities and not to pleiotropic changes in the activities of enzymes closely linked to glycogen biosynthesis. As shown in Table 3, GlgC, GlgA, PGM, and AspP activities in both
glgP- and glgP-overexpressing cells did not vary much with respect to those of WT cells. Remarkably, these analyses also revealed that maximum catalytic glycogen phosphorylase activities in WT cells are higher than those of gluconeogenic enzymes, such as GlgC and GlgA, during glycogen accumulation. This, and the fact that a moderate increase of glycogen phosphorylase activity leads to a dramatic reduction of glycogen content (Fig. 3B), indicates that, unless GlgP is highly regulated in the bacterial cell, glycogen accumulation would be prevented. In this context, it is noteworthy that, in contrast to the highly regulated eukaryotic glucan phosphorylases, bacterial phosphorylases show no apparent regulatory properties and are thought to be exclusively controlled at the level of gene expression (12, 36, 42, 49, 53). However, several reports have suggested that bacterial GlgPs may be subjected to posttranslational regulation. Chen and Segel (19), for instance, showed that E. coli glycogen phosphorylase activity in the glycogen synthetic direction can be moderately activated by AMP and inhibited by ADPG. However, our results indicate that GlgP does not exhibit regulatory properties with respect to substrates of physiological relevance, such as AMP, ADPG, UDP-glucose, glucose, and hexose-Ps, when assayed in the glycogen breakdown direction (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). GlgP could also be allosterically modulated in E. coli as a result of its interaction with the histidine phosphocarrier protein (HPr) of the phosphotransferase system (51). Other models of bacterial GlgP regulation are based on the occurrence of both particle-associated and soluble GlgP states, whose balance has been proposed to control glycogen accumulation (45). Needless to say, possible regulatory properties of GlgP and its importance in the control of glycogen accumulation need to be further investigated. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Activities of some enzymes closely linked to glycogen metabolism in transformed BL21(DE3)C43 cellsa
|
We thank Beatriz Zugasti (I.A., Pamplona, Spain) for expert technical support. We are indebted to Laura Guembe (University of Navarra) for technical assistance in EM analyses. We express our gratitude to M. Berlyn, E. coli Genetic Stock Center (Yale University) and the Pasteur Institute for providing us with the B/r and TG1 cells, respectively.
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/. ![]()
N.A.-C. and D.D. have equally contributed to this work. ![]()
|
|
|---|
-1,4-glucan phosphorylase? J. Bacteriol. 127:281-290.This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»