Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, August 2006, p. 5374-5384, Vol. 188, No. 15
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00513-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Sanford School of Medicine, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57049
Received 10 April 2006/ Accepted 22 May 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The targets of PSK toxins vary, and many are yet to be identified. The target of CcdB toxin of the Escherichia coli F-carried ccd locus was the first defined; CcdB was found to bind GyrA and poison the DNA-gyrase complex (1, 26). Recently the crystal structure of CcdB bound to the relevant GyrA fragment and a model of how it poisons gyrase were reported (9). The ParE toxin of the parDE system of the broad-host-range plasmid RK2 also targets DNA gyrase (24). The Kid toxin of the R1-carried Kis/Kid locus functions as an endoribonuclease, inhibiting protein synthesis by cleaving mRNA at 5'-UA(A/C)-3' sites (28, 33, 41). Toxins from a number of chromosomally encoded toxin-antitoxin modules act in a similar manner (32, 42, 43) and appear to function as stress response loci (7). Finally, the Hok toxin of the R1-carried RNA-regulated hok/sok system leads to the formation of "ghost" cells and the collapse of membrane potential (13, 15), but the specific target and mechanism of action remain unknown.
Very few PSK
systems have been identified on plasmids native to gram-positive
bacteria, and they are less well described than their gram-negative
bacterial counterparts. The Axe-Txe locus was identified on the pRUM
plasmid in Enterococcus faecium
(16). While the target of
the Txe toxin is unknown, its sequence is similar to that of the YoeB
protein encoded on the E. coli chromosome, which belongs to
the family of endoribonucleases discussed above
(6), and Txe is toxic to
E. coli. The Streptococcus pyogenes plasmid pSM19035
encodes a unique three-component PSK consisting of the
regulatory component, the
antitoxin, and the
toxin
(44). Induction of
in Bacillus subtilis leads to a variety of
morphological defects, chromosome loss, and cell lysis. Induction in
E. coli leads to filamentation without SOS induction and is
bacteriostatic. Interestingly,
is also toxic to
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but the specific target is not known
in any of these organisms.
The only RNA-regulated PSK system in
gram-positive organisms is the par locus of Enterococcus
faecalis plasmid pAD1. pAD1 is the prototype of a family of
plasmids whose conjugative systems are induced by peptide sex
pheromones secreted by potential recipients
(10). par is a
self-contained PSK locus less than 400 bp in size encoding two small
RNAs, the
70-nucleotide regulatory RNA, RNA II, and the
215-nucleotide toxin-encoding RNA, RNA I
(37,
38). Unlike most
plasmid-encoded RNA-regulated systems, the two RNAs are transcribed
convergently, overlapping only at a bidirectional intrinsic terminator.
However, the RNAs are transcribed in opposite directions across a pair
of direct repeats, resulting in dispersed regions of complementarity
more similar to chromosomally encoded RNA regulators than to
traditional antisense-regulated systems
(18,
19,
36). Binding of RNA II to
RNA I suppresses the translation of a 33-amino-acid peptide designated
Fst which functions as the toxin of the system
(17). Overproduction of
Fst results in a loss of cell viability, loss of membrane integrity,
abnormalities in chromosomal segregation and cell division, and
hypersensitivity to the lantibiotic nisin
(39). While the small
size and apparent hydrophobicity of Fst suggest that it could aggregate
in the membrane and facilitate pore formation, the effects on membrane
integrity and the collapse of macromolecular synthesis occurred
relatively late, nearly 45 min, after induction. Furthermore, electron
micrographs revealed no apparent membrane abnormalities and none of the
leakage of cell contents that characterizes Hok toxicity in E.
coli. These results suggest that the membrane effects could be
secondary to division or segregation defects. To examine this
possibility, we performed time course experiments using fluorescent
vancomycin (Fl-Van), a dye that stains un-cross-linked and therefore
recently incorporated peptidoglycan
(8), and a variety of
membrane-permeant and -impermeant DNA stains. Multiple cell division
abnormalities and aberrant chromosomal distribution, including the
segregation of chromosome-free cells, were observed as early as 15 min
after Fst induction. At such early time points little DNA staining was
observed with membrane-impermeant stains in unfixed cells, suggesting
that loss of membrane integrity is a secondary effect of division and
segregation defects. The conclusion that the primary Fst target is
involved in chromosomal segregation and/or structure was further
supported by studies of Fst toxicity in Bacillus subtilis,
which showed a primary effect on nucleoid structure and only minor
effects on peptidoglycan
synthesis.
|
|
|---|
cells
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The PCR fragment was then removed from
pGEM-T-Easy using the appropriate restriction enzymes and subcloned to
similarly cut pDR66 (23)
kindly provided by Alan Grossman, Department of Biology, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology. The plasmid was then transformed into B.
subtilis strain BG1
(30), kindly provided by
D. Bechhofer, Mount Sinai School of Medicine. pDR66 does not encode a
functional replicon for B. subtilis but contains the Pspac
promoter, any cloned genes, and the chloramphenicol resistance gene
between upstream and downstream segments of the B. subtilis
chromosomal amyE gene. Selection for chloramphenicol
resistance results in selection of transformants with the genes of
interest inserted at the amyE chromosomal locus. This was
confirmed by demonstrating loss of amylase activity by the starch test.
Briefly, the culture was streaked on a 0.2% Luria-Bertani (LB) starch
plate and grown overnight at 37°C. The plate was flooded with
Gram's iodine solution, and the absence of clearing around the streak
demonstrated disruption of amyE. In addition, chromosomal DNA
was purified from a selected transformant using the MasterPure DNA
purification kit (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI), and the RNA
I gene and flanking DNA were amplified by PCR using the primers lacI
(GCCCACTGACGCGTTGCGCG) and pDR66 reverse
(GGATAACAATTAAGCTTGGGC) and sequenced to ensure
proper sequence and fusion to the Pspac promoter. This strain was
designated BG565. A control strain, BG1:pDR66, containing only the
empty vector was also constructed.
E. faecalis strains
were cultured in Todd-Hewitt broth (THB; Sigma-Aldrich) with
erythromycin, 10 µg ml1. The strains were
grown at 37°C in tubes with shaking at 250 rpm in an Innova
4230 incubator shaker (New Brunswick Scientific Co., Edison, NJ). For
microscopy, 0.2 ml of overnight-grown cultures was used to inoculate 10
ml of THB and grown at 37°C to an optical density at 660 nm of
0.1 for ca. 1 h. The pheromone cAD1 was added at
this point, and the cultures were further grown for 1 h at
37°C before being processed for staining.
Growth was monitored by the change in optical density at 660 nm in a Milton Roy Spectronic 21D (Fisher Scientific) densitometer fitted for direct measurement of tubes with a 13-mm diameter.
The fst gene of OG1X(pAM2005K) was induced by addition of synthetic cAD1 (Sigma-Genosys) at 200 ng ml1 from a 200-µg ml1 stock in dimethyl sulfoxide.
Bacillus subtilis BG1 and its derivative strains were grown in standard LB medium for 18 to 20 h at 37°C in an incubator-shaker (New Brunswick Scientific, Edison, NJ) at 200 rpm with chloramphenicol (10 µg ml1) before they were diluted 1:20 in fresh medium without the antibiotic. Isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to the medium at a 1 mM concentration to induce the expression of RNA I under the control of the Pspac promoter after 30 min of growth.
RNA isolation from B. subtilis strains and Northern blot assays were done as described earlier with E. faecalis, with the only modification being that cultures were grown for 90 min in LB rather than 120 min in THB prior to harvest (39). The RNA I-specific probe used had the sequence 5'-ATAACCAACGACATTAAATCTTCAC-3'. It was used along with a standard probe for B. subtilis 5S rRNA with the sequence 5'-AACGGGTGTGACCTCTTCGCTAT-3'.
Fluorescence microscopy. Aliquots (500 µl) of bacterial cultures grown as described above were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 1 min at room temperature. The pellets were resuspended in 20 µl staining solution containing 2 M glucose, 1 M Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, and 0.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0. The cells were stained directly without fixation by mixing Fl-Van (a 1:1 mixture of vancomycin and BODIPY Fl-conjugated vancomycin [Molecular Probes]; final concentration, 2 µg ml1) and, where used as costain, propidium iodide (PI) (Molecular Probes; final concentration, 20 µg ml1) for 5 min at room temperature in the dark. Fixed cells were treated with an equal volume of ice-cold 100% methanol, vortexed, and then centrifuged. Stained bacterial cells were spread on microscopic slides coated with poly-L-lysine (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole; Molecular Probes) was used at a final concentration of 0.2 µg ml1.
BG565 and BG1:pDR66 cells were grown in LB at 37°C overnight and diluted (1:20) in fresh medium. IPTG (1 mM) was added after 30 min of growth, and cultures were grown for a further 30 min before the cells (500 µl) were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 1 min. The pellet was resuspended in 20 µl of staining solution. Cells were incubated with 200 ng ml1 FM4-64 and 0.1 µl of 5 mM Sytox Green (Molecular Probes) for 5 min at room temperature in the dark. The samples were then spread and dried on poly-L-lysine-coated slides.
Samples were viewed on an Olympus BX61 confocal laser scanning microscope utilizing argon, Helium Neon Red, and Helium Neon Green with a 60x Plan Apo oil-immersion objective (numerical aperture, 1.40) with 6x zoom using the generic green filter set for Fl-Van and the PI filter set for PI. DAPI staining was done on an Olympus AX70 upright compound microscope using an Olympus DP70 digital camera. The images were processed using Adobe PhotoDeluxe BE 1.0.
|
|
|---|
As shown in Fig. 1 (for a color version, see Fig. S1 posted at http://www.usd.edu/biomed/biomedfaculty/weaver) cells stained prior to Fst induction show a pattern of Fl-Van staining similar to that previously observed in other members of the streptococcal family (29). The majority of cells were in chains with multiple oval cells showing a bright spot of Fl-Van staining between each cell and a centrally placed band of staining marking the position of the new, as yet unconstricted septum. In some cells septal constriction had begun, observed as a bright constricting belt at midcell (for example, the dividing pairs labeled 1, 2, and 3). In these cells, faintly staining secondary bands were symmetrically placed on each side of the constricting band. These faint bands got brighter as constriction of the central band progressed. As expected, no PI staining was detected in uninduced cells.
![]() View larger version (67K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Effects
of Fst induction on peptidoglycan synthesis and membrane permeability
as determined by Fl-Van and PI staining, respectively. All panels show,
from left to right, Fl-Van staining, PI staining, and an overlay of
both. Uninduced cells are shown in the 0-min panel. Similar results
were obtained with cells that were induced and immediately stained.
Cells labeled 1, 2, and 3 show the normal progression through the
division cycle as described in the text. The time after induction is
shown to the left of the other panels. The 15-min panel shows two
elongated cells at the right end of the chain. In the terminal cell the
septal band is off center. In the penultimate cell a second, fainter
septal band (marked by an arrow) is observed to the right of the main
septal band, which is in turn off center in the direction opposite that
in the terminal cell. In the top 30-min panel a chain of cells showing
various abnormalities is shown. The leftmost "cell"
shows multiple partially constricted bands, the second and fifth cells
from the left show asymmetric secondary septal bands, and the third and
fourth cells from the left each show two brightly staining septal
bands. The bottom panel shows a chain of filamenting cells, and the
arrows highlight segments of two filaments that stain with PI while the
rest of the "cell" does not. Note that the two terminal
cells on the right of the figure show filamentation but do not stain
with PI. Bars = 2
µm.
|
By 30 min, cell division defects became more prominent, more widespread, and more diverse. Virtually all cells were elongated or showed some other abnormality. Abnormalities included filaments containing multiple partially constricted or unconstricted bands, cells with asymmetrically placed bands, and cells with an even number of bands. Examples of all of these defects can be observed in the chain shown in the top 30-min panel of Fig. 1. Although at this point it became difficult to define where one cell ended and another began, approximately half of the cells showed PI staining. However, cells showing division defects were frequently not stained while apparently normal-looking cells stained brightly. Also, filamented and segmented cells frequently showed staining in one segment but not others (arrows in bottom 30-min panel of Fig. 1).
At 45 min effects were maximal and multiply segmented filaments became the most frequent cell form. At this stage, effects of Fst on Fl-Van staining could be compared to previous results obtained with SEM (Fig. 2; for a color version, please see Fig. S2 posted at http://www.usd.edu/biomed/biomedfaculty/weaver). Figure 2A compares uninduced Fl-Van-stained cells with a SEM of uninduced cells, each showing a typical streptococcal pattern. The centrally located chain in the Fl-Van image contains several cells at an early stage of cell division. In uninduced cells such chains invariably showed alternating brightly staining partially constricted bands and lightly staining unconstricted bands. The bright constricted bands correlate with clear separations between cells on the phase-contrast image while the faint bands do not. In the SEM, the bright bands correspond to the constrictions between cells while the faint bands correspond to the centrally located ridges that have been previously referred to as cell wall bands.
![]() View larger version (69K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Maximal
effects of Fst on cell division and membrane permeability and
comparison with SEMs. (A to C) The set of three micrographs shows, from
left to right, Fl-Van-stained cells, a phase-contrast image of the same
field, and an analogous SEM. (A) Uninduced cells show the
typical streptococcal cell morphology. Thick and thin arrows show the
normal alternation of constricting primary bands and unconstricted
secondary bands, respectively. In the SEM, thin arrows mark the cell
wall bands that correspond to faintly staining Fl-Van bands and the
thick arrow marks a constricting septum that corresponds to the
brightly staining Fl-Van bands. (B) After 45 min of Fst
induction bright and faint bands no longer alternate consistently as
indicated by the arrows. The arrow in the bright-field image shows a
visible cross band that corresponds to a faintly staining Fl-Van band.
(C) Normal-looking chains with regular constrictions show
secondary bands that stain brightly and show visible cell separation in
bright-phase images (arrows). These bands correspond to the prematurely
separated cell wall bands observed in SEMs (thin arrows). (D)
The images show, from left to right, Fl-Van staining, PI staining, and
an overlay after 45 min of induction. In the overlay, arrows mark two
segments of a filament that stain with PI while others do not. SEMs
were reproduced from reference
39 with permission. Bar
= 2
µm.
|
Fst causes aberrant nucleoid segregation. The unusual distribution of PI staining in the segments of cell filaments suggested that the segregation of chromosomal DNA might be affected by Fst exposure. This possibility was supported by previous transmission electron micrographs that showed cells with misplaced and apparently incomplete complements of chromosomal DNA (39). To better examine the effect of Fst on DNA segregation, cells induced for Fst expression were simultaneously stained with Fl-Van and DAPI, a membrane-permeant DNA stain.
Figure 3A shows the effects of Fst on DAPI staining over time. As expected, in uninduced cells, DAPI staining resolved into well-separated nearly equally staining spots that coincided with the dividing cells. Incompletely divided cells showed a bilobed staining that was constricted at the midpoint. In contrast, induced cells at all time points showed a highly irregular pattern of staining with bright streaks of staining extending over several cells and unequal amounts of DNA in adjacent cells. Even at 15 min, cells lacking apparent staining were observed, and this became more prominent at later time points with multiply segmented cells showing differential staining among the segments, as observed at later time points with PI staining. Frequently it appeared that all or most of the chromosome had segregated into one segment of a multiply segmented cell. To further examine this effect, cells induced for Fst expression for 15 min were fixed with methanol to permeabilize the membranes and then stained with Fl-Van and PI (Fig. 3B). Although the fixing procedure decreased the resolution of the Fl-Van staining, it was still clear that nucleoid-free cells were present as early as 15 min after Fst induction. For color versions of these figures, see Fig. S3 at http://www.usd.edu/biomed/biomedfaculty/weaver.
![]() View larger version (47K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Fst-induced
defects in chromosome segregation as observed by DAPI staining and PI
staining of fixed cells. A. DAPI staining of unfixed cells at various
time points following Fst induction. Each row shows Fl-Van-stained
cells on the left, DAPI-stained cells in the center, and overlays on
the right. The numbers shown on the left correspond to time after
induction of Fst transcription. At zero time, typical uninduced cells
are observed with chains of spots of nearly equal intensity in normally
dividing cells. At 15 min after induction, aberrant chromosome
distribution is observed. The cell marked with the arrow is typical of
aberrant cells observed at this time point, elongated showing a single
faint septal band to the left of the main band. Note that the majority
of the DAPI staining is to the right of the bright band in this cell.
In the 30-min images, arrows highlight two cells: the top arrow shows a
cell in the initial stages of filamentation and the bottom arrow shows
a cell that appears to be dividing. However, in both cases the DAPI
staining occurs predominantly in one half of the cell. The cell between
these two cells shows very little DNA staining. At 45 min after
induction, filamentation is extensive, and in this image the majority
of staining appears to be at the ends of the filaments with little
staining in between. B. Chain of methanol-fixed cells 15 min after Fst
induction stained with Fl-Van and PI. The arrows indicate cells that
show no staining with PI. Bars = 2
µm.
|
Somewhat surprisingly, m7 mutants cultured in the absence of Fst (either uninduced or entirely lacking the Fst-encoding plasmid) showed division abnormalities that were similar to but less severe than those observed in the Fst-exposed wild-type strains (Fig. 4A; for a color version, please see Fig. S4A posted at http://www.usd.edu/biomed/biomedfaculty/weaver). Elongated cells with multiple brightly staining "septal" bands were frequently observed. However, the number of bands rarely exceeded three and filamentous cells with multiple partially invaginated septae were not observed. Dividing cells sometimes appeared to be stretched or twisted in m7 cells, a feature which was not observed in wild-type induced cells. Cells induced for Fst production for even prolonged periods were indistinguishable from uninduced cells, and neither induced nor uninduced cells showed detectable staining with PI without fixing (data not shown). DAPI staining showed much less variability in m7 whether induced or uninduced (see Fig. S4C in the supplemental material), but the higher resolution allowed by PI staining of fixed cells revealed that about 10% of cells in the presence or absence of Fst appeared to lack chromosomes. Figure 4B (for a color version, please see Fig. S4B posted at http://www.usd.edu/biomed/biomedfaculty/weaver) shows a particularly variable chain. Therefore, it appears that the mutation(s) present in m7 that allows it to resist Fst results in alterations in septal development and chromosomal segregation. It appears that these two phenomena are linked in both Fst toxicity and resistance, suggesting that alteration of a single protein may affect both.
![]() View larger version (90K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Cell division and chromosome segregation in the Fst-resistant strain m7. (A) Two panels of typical m7 chains; Fl-Van staining is on the left, and bright-field microscopy is on the right. The
closed-headed arrows show cells with aberrant septal formation. The
open-headed arrow shows a cell with a stretched central division site.
(B) Fixed cells stained with Fl-Van and PI. This particular
chain showed a lot of variability in nucleoid staining and several
apparently DNA-free cells. Bars = 2
µm.
|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Fst-dependent
growth inhibition of B. subtilis cells. (A) Growth in the
presence and absence of IPTG-induced Fst production. Fst was produced
from an RNA I gene linked to the IPTG-inducible Pspac promoter that had
been integrated into the chromosome at the amyE locus as
described in Materials and Methods. IPTG was added to a final
concentration of 1 mM after 30 min of culture. , uninduced
control; , IPTG induced. (B) Northern blot showing
IPTG-dependent production of Fst-encoding RNA I. RNA was purified from
uninduced and induced cultures, fractionated, transferred to a
membrane, and probed with RNA I and 5S rRNA-specific probes as
described in Materials and Methods. Lane 1, uninduced culture; lane 2,
IPTG-induced culture.
|
![]() View larger version (136K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Effects of Fst on peptidoglycan synthesis in B. subtilis. (A) Typical patterns of Fl-Van staining seen under the
culture and staining conditions used in this experiment. Staining is
predominantly polar and septal with some hazy staining on the side
walls that may be indicative of the helices observed under other
conditions. Such helices may not be observed here because of the more
rapid growth of cells in rich medium. The last panel shows a cell chain
which is occasionally observed. (B) Typical microscopic field
of cells induced for Fst production 30 min before Fl-Van staining.
Although many cells appear unaffected by Fst production, some cells
show an unusual accumulation of staining on the side walls that results
in cell bending (arrows). Occasionally, cells show complete staining in
limited regions of the cell (stars). Bars = 5 µm.
|
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Fst-induced effects on nucleoid structure and distribution in B. subtilis. Uninduced (A) and 30-min IPTG-induced (B) cells were stained with the membrane stain FM4-64 and the DNA stain Sytox Green. The rows show FM4-64 staining on the left, Sytox Green staining in the center, and overlays on the right. Sytox Green staining produces a diffuse and even staining extending the length of the cell in uninduced cells. In the majority of induced cells the stain is localized near midcell and appears to be membrane associated. Occasionally, the brightest staining adopts a helical configuration (arrows). Cells show various amounts of background staining in addition to the condensed
spots or helices. Bars = 5 µm.
|
|
|
|---|
While unequal DNA segregation was also observed in B. subtilis, the most distinctive characteristic of the effect of Fst on this species was an apparent condensation of most of the DNA in the cell to a single focus. Most frequently these foci were single spots located near the midpoint of the cell, but short arcs and helices were also commonly observed. Such a condensation of the nucleoid was not observed in E. faecalis even after prolonged incubation, but this may simply reflect an inability to adequately resolve the nucleoid within the smaller spherical cells of this species. However, the possibility that differences in cell cytoskeleton between the two species might also affect differences in the effects of Fst on nucleoid structure should be considered. In particular, B. subtilis genes encode a number of actin homologs which form helical structures at the cell surface that may be involved in both peptidoglycan synthesis and chromosome partitioning (8, 34). E. faecalis, like other spherical cells, appears to lack such proteins, which might account for the difference in chromosomal appearance compared to B. subtilis cells. Of course, it is also possible that Fst targets different proteins or the same protein with different effects in the two hosts, but the fact that Fst induction in both hosts leads to hypersensitivity to nisin suggests that the effects are related.
Fst's effects on cell division in E. faecalis were quite dramatic, with the organism displaying cellular elongation, hyperseptation, and altered septal placement even at early time points. Morlot et al. previously proposed a model of cell wall growth and division for Streptococcus pneumoniae based on visual localization of penicillin binding and other cell division proteins (27) which probably applies at least in broad outline to E. faecalis as well. This model requires coordination of lateral cell wall growth, septal formation, and constriction. Fst exposure seemed to affect primarily the constriction phase and also appeared to uncouple lateral wall growth and septal placement, resulting in variability in the spacing of septal planes. It is possible that all of these effects are secondary effects of the improper segregation of chromosomal DNA. It is known that in both E. coli and B. subtilis the presence of DNA near the normal division site can suppress the earliest phases of cell division, a phenomenon known as nucleoid occlusion (2, 40). However, it should be noted that, if nucleoid occlusion does occur in the chain-forming streptococci, it must differ in its particulars from that in rod-shaped organisms. Thus, nucleoid occlusion in B. subtilis and E. coli occurs at the formation of the FtsZ ring before septal synthesis begins, but in S. pneumoniae and E. faecalis synthesis of the next septal peptidoglycan rings occurs early during the preceding cell division and presumably before DNA segregation. The presence of excess, improperly segregated DNA could, however, favor lateral growth over septal formation and/or inhibit septal in-growth, a feature apparent in Fst-exposed cells. Conversely, the absence of a complete DNA complement could release nucleoid occlusion, leading to increased lateral and septal wall formation, features also observed in Fst-exposed cells. Interestingly, preliminary results indicate that exposure to nalidixic acid results in cell division defects similar to, though less severe than, those caused by Fst (data not shown).
Alternatively, Fst could affect a protein involved in both chromosomal segregation and septal formation. For example, SpoIIIE/FtsK has been shown to be involved in septum formation; separation of chromosomal catenanes and dimers through interaction with topoisomerase IV and XerCD/dif, respectively; and translocation of chromosomal copies to daughter cells (3, 11, 22, 25). The genome sequence of E. faecalis V583 contains five SpoIIIE homologs (31). The observation that the Fst-resistant mutant showed alterations in both septum formation and chromosome partitioning might support the hypothesis that Fst targets a protein common to both processes. The mutation leading to resistance could reduce the affinity of the target for Fst but also alter and/or compromise its function in both septation and partition. Of course, this assumes that resistance is due to a single mutation in the Fst target rather than to multiple mutations in genes other than the target, resulting in suppression of the toxin's effects, an assumption currently without experimental support.
Finally, any model of Fst toxicity and resistance must account for the fact that exposure to Fst sensitizes cells to nisin and Fst-resistant cells are cross-resistant to nisin (39). Nisin functions primarily as a pore-forming peptide (12), and it was originally proposed that nisin and Fst might act in concert to depolarize the bacterial membrane. The current results cast doubt on this proposal since Fst's primary effect did not appear to be on membrane integrity. However, nisin is also known to use lipid II as a docking molecule and to perturb peptidoglycan synthesis (4). Given the fact that Fst exposure altered the pattern of peptidoglycan synthesis in both E. faecalis and B. subtilis, it is possible that this is the source of the synergistic effect of the two toxins. Interestingly, even though the Fst-resistant mutant shows some features reminiscent of the Fst-induced wild-type strain, it is resistant to nisin, suggesting perhaps that a fundamental change in peptidoglycan synthesis has occurred.
In summary, Fst is a peptide toxin that simultaneously affects chromosomal segregation and cell division/peptidoglycan synthesis in both E. faecalis and B. subtilis. Since Fst contains a hydrophobic stretch of amino acids predicted to form a transmembrane domain, it seems likely that its target is located at or near the cell membrane. Whether this target affects only DNA segregation directly or affects both DNA segregation and cell division remains to be determined.
This work was supported by Public Health Service grant GM55544.
Supplemental material for this article may be found at
http://jb.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»