Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, September 2006, p. 6195-6206, Vol. 188, No. 17
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00466-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Laboratory of Sialobiology and Comparative Metabolomics, Department of Pathobiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois,1 Department of Biotechnology, Dong-A University, Busan, South Korea,2 Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, Maryland,3 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York4
Received 4 April 2006/ Accepted 15 June 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
2,8-glycoketosidic linkages (36). The kps and neu genes needed for polysialic acid synthesis and export map to a 17-kb accretion domain inserted near pheV (7). Mutation of neu (biosynthetic) genes generally results in no capsular polysaccharide produced while kps mutations usually result in intracellular accumulation of unexported polysaccharides (46, 47). Polysialic acid is also found on the mammalian neural cell adhesion molecule and comprises the group B meningococcal, Pasteurella haemolytica A2, and Moraxella nonliquefaciens capsular polysaccharides (41). Mammalian polysialic acid regulates cell migration, axon pathfinding and targeting, and plasticity in the embryonic and adult nervous system (6). Molecular mimicry of this antigen by the bacterial capsules is thought to account for the relatively low immunogenicity of microbial polysialic acid, which has limited the attempts to produce safe and effective capsule-based vaccines (41). Known functions of the capsule include inhibition of phagocytosis and other innate immune responses to microbial infection, but despite our understanding of capsule function during extraintestinal disease, we know little about its role in colonization of the mammalian large intestine. Increased understanding of the colonization process may suggest new targets for therapeutic development.
Unlike the neural cell adhesion molecule or group B meningococcal polysialic acid, the E. coli K1 capsule may exist in an alternate form in which the individual Neu5Ac residues are variably modified with O-acetyl esters at carbon positions 7 or 9. The O-acetyltransferase gene, neuO, responsible for these modifications is carried on a K1-specific prophage designated CUS-3 (13). In addition to lysogeny, neuO expression is controlled by a translational switch involving slipped-strand DNA mispairing of heptanucleotide repeats located in the 5' coding region. This switch is designated the poly
domain, where loss or gain of heptad repeats in any number other than a multiple of three results in frameshift mutation and synthesis of truncated (inactive) neuO gene products. The neuO contingency locus and its mobile phage delivery vehicle account for at least five capsule forms: (i) permanently acetylation "off" because the cell is not a CUS-3 lysogen, (ii) stochastic variation in the proportion of "on" and "off" forms caused by neuO frameshifting, (iii) variation in the degree of acetylation, which may depend on the length of the poly
domain, (iv) variation in the positions of acetyl esters on individual Neu5Ac residues of the polysialic acid chains (carbon positions 7 or 9), resulting from nonenzymatic transesterification and (v) variation in the positioning of sialyl O-acetyl esters along the chains resulting from incomplete acetylation. Variation in neuO and its metabolic products thus has the capacity to alter capsule antigenicity and physiochemical properties of the K1 cell surface, with one locus accounting for potentially thousands of different capsular phenotypes (48).
In addition to neuO, the K1 neuD gene product annotates as an acyltransferase (4), and the group B Streptococcus (GBS) NeuD orthologue has been shown to be a monomeric sialic acid O-acetyltransferase responsible for modification of the streptococcal capsular polysaccharide (23, 24). Complementation of a GBS neuD mutant with K1 neuD+ restores sialyl O acetylation, indicating that K1 NeuD is also a monomeric O-acetyltransferase (23). In GBS, where O-acetyl esters are found at carbon positions 7, 8, or 9, the acetylated monomers are activated and transferred as terminal nonreducing residues of the capsule main chain. Therefore, neuD in E. coli K1 suggests there may be two acetylation pathways in this species, one involving neuO for modification of polysialic acid and the other, involving neuD, for acetylation of monomeric sialic acid. Furthermore, neuA encodes a bifunctional enzyme including N-terminal cytidine 5'-monophospho-N-acetylneuraminic acid (CMP-Neu5Ac synthetase) and C-terminal esterase in both the K1 and GBS systems (26, 52), suggesting a mechanism for converting acetylated monomeric sialic acid to the de-O-acetylated forms. In this communication we describe separate pathways for the O acetylation of polymeric and monomeric sialic acids and provide the first demonstration of a new class of esterase with activity against O-acetylated sialic acids.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
|
Enzymes.
Recombinant, histidine-tagged endo-N-acetylneuraminidase (endo-N), from phage PK1E, was purified from a culture of IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactoside)-induced E. coli BL21(DE3) essentially as described previously (30). CMP-Neu5Ac synthetase was purified as previously described (53, 54) from a culture of induced cells expressing pWV200b and had a specific activity of 610.3 units/mg protein, where 1 unit activates 1 µmol of Neu5Ac in 1 min at 37°C. Other enzymes were used as induced soluble extracts from cells (BL21 or DH5
) grown in overexpression broth (Zymo Research, Orange, CA) with 1 mM IPTG. Esterase activity was assayed as described by Yu et al. (52), with the absorbance of para-nitrophenol, resulting from hydrolysis of pNP-Ac, determined at 405 nm after 6 min of incubation at room temperature using a Beckman DU-640 spectrophotometer. Complete hydrolysis of pNP-Ac was accomplished by the addition of NaOH to a final concentration of 0.1 M. Data are expressed as activity relative to complete base hydrolysis, normalized for protein concentration as indicated.
Isolation and characterization of neuO form variants.
Strains EV717 (neuO "off") and EV718 (neuO "on") were isolated from EV291 essentially as described previously (13). Briefly, EV291 was grown overnight in LB and plated for single colonies on agar medium containing 10% (vol/vol) horse-46 anti-polysialic acid antiserum. Colonies were examined for surrounding halos representing precipitation responses to polysialic acid, where acetylated capsular polysaccharide gives no or only a weak halo response. The lengths of the poly
domains in the two variants were determined by PCR analysis using flanking forward and flanking reverse primers (13) and were found to contain 20 and 21 heptad repeats in EV717 and EV718, respectively.
DMB analyses and TLC of
-keto compounds.
For the analysis of capsular polysialic acid by thin-layer chromatography (TLC), cells from 10- to 30-ml cultures were harvested by centrifugation. The pellets were resuspended in 1/10 volume of 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and repelleted by centrifugation. Polysialic acid in the supernatants was either applied directly to silica gel thin-layer plates or treated with endo-N (50 µg) at 37°C for 2 h to release sialic acids prior to the application. Plates were developed with n-propanol:water (7:3, vol/vol) solvent, and sialic acids were visualized by orcinol spray as previously described (39). For DMB analysis, oligosialic acids released by endo-N digestion of whole cells were hydrolyzed completely to monomers by incubation at 80°C with an equal volume of 4 M acetic acid for 3 h. Any precipitate was removed by centrifugation in a microcentrifuge at 16,100 x g for 10 min at 4°C. Samples were concentrated at least 10-fold in a Savant SpeedVac system and recentrifuged, and 15-µl samples were subjected to DMB-labeling exactly as described in the original procedure (18). After being labeled in the dark for 2.5 h at 50°C, samples were centrifuged through 0.22-µm-pore-size nylon filters, and 6-µl aliquots were immediately analyzed fluorescently (373 nm excitation and 448 nm excitation) using a reverse phase (RP) high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system equipped with Dionex AS50 Autosampler, GP50 Gradient Pump, RF2000 Fluorescence Detector, and Chromeleon version 6.50 software for data management. The solvent, acetonitrile-methanol-water (8:7:84, vol/vol/vol), was slightly modified from the 9:7:84 mixture originally described (18). One major modification was the use of a 4.6-mm by 10-cm TSKgel Super-ODS column (2 µm, 110 Å; Tosoh Bioscience, Montgomeryville, PA), which resulted in elimination of the reagent peak or DMB-breakdown product that elutes just after Neu5,9Ac2 (18). After the completion of any given set of experiments, the column was washed with 50% methanol before the next use. For the analysis of intracellular sialic acids, soluble cell extracts were prepared by sonic disruption and centrifugation to remove debris and then incubated with an equal volume of 4 M acetic acid for 30 min at 80°C before precipitated material was removed by centrifugation and RP-HPLC analysis as described above. Data were expressed as relative fluorescence versus time as previously described (23, 24), where elution of Neu5Ac quinoxalinone derivatives (25) varied between 9.5 and 13.6 min. However, on a given day's experiments the relative elution of all peaks was consistent. Where quantitative comparisons were made, the supporting data are posted on the Laboratory of Sialobiology website (www.cvm.uiuc.edu/path/sialobiology). Confirmation of O acetylation was obtained by mild-base hydrolysis prior to DMB labeling (24).
|
|
|---|
1-subunit of bovine brain platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH) isoform I. Similarly, the GBS NeuA orthologue C terminus was shown to be an acetyl esterase, and the authors (52) speculated that this activity might regulate accumulation of acetylated Neu5Ac derivatives synthesized by NeuD (23, 24). These observations suggest two molecular forms of NeuA: the long or bifunctional form, and a short form composed of just the synthetase domain. This hypothesis predicts that organisms with neuD might acetylate monomeric sialic acids and use a long form of NeuA to regulate intracellular O-acetylated monomeric sialic acid concentrations, while organisms that synthesize or activate sialic acids but that lack neuD might express only the NeuA short form that lacks esterase activity. We designated the putative sialyl O-acetyl esterase domain of the synthetase NeuA-star (NeuA*). To investigate the correlation between the NeuA form and sialic acid acetylation, we carried out a BLAST (3) search for K1 NeuA and NeuD orthologues. As shown in Table 2, there was general concordance between acetylation/NeuD and NeuA*. Notable exceptions were the neuA gene products of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Legionella pneumophila, which are known to acetylate the sialic acid-like molecules pseudaminic and legionaminic acid, respectively, and Neisseria meningitidis groups C, Y, and W-135, which are known to acetylate sialic acid but express the NeuA short form. Campylobacter jejuni was unusual because it contains both short and long synthetase forms. L. pneumophila expresses the NeuA short form while the P. aeruginosa long-form C-terminal domain was more similar to nucleotidyl transferase than esterase. When taken together, the results shown in Table 2 suggest that there may be two acetylation pathways in E. coli K1, one for polysialic acid catalyzed by the neuO-encoded O-acetyltransferase and another for acetylation of monomeric sialic acids (Fig. 1).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Distribution of NeuA* and NeuD in humans and in bacteria that are known to synthesize or activate sialic, pseudaminic, or legionaminic acid
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Biosynthesis of E. coli K1 polysialic acid and modification by O acetylation. Evidence supporting the biosynthesis and modification of polysialic acid is provided in references 51 and 13, respectively. The monomeric modification, or NeuD-catalyzed pathway, is shown connected to the main pathway by nonspecific (other) or specific (NeuA*) sialyl O-acetyl esterases. AcCoA, acetyl coenzyme A; Ac, acetate; ManNAc, N-acetylmannosamine; UDP-GlcNAc, UDP-N-acetylglucosamine; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate. Induction of the nanATEKyhcH operon caused by derepression by NanR binding to sialic acid is indicated by the broken arrow.
|
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Sensitivity of acetylated polysialic acid to endo-N digestion. Polysialic acid from EV36 (pGEM) or EV36 (pSX785) and commercially available colominic acid (lanes 5 to 7, respectively) were digested with recombinant endo-N and analyzed by TLC (lanes 2 to 4, respectively). Lane 1 shows the migration of monomeric Neu5Ac standard (20 µg). Staining and migration artifacts resulted from sample overloading in order to detect minor O-acetylated Neu5Ac.
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. DMB-labeling and analysis of capsular polysialic acid. Encapsulated E. coli K1 (smooth rectangle with wavy lines) expressing acetylated (Ac+) or unacetylated (Ac) polysialic acid (wavy lines) is treated in step 1 with recombinant endo-N (lawn mower icon), producing oligosialic acids and intact cells with shorn capsules; treated cells are removed by centrifugation. After acetic acid hydrolysis to produce monomeric sialic acids (Sia's) in step 2, the reducing ends were labeled with DMB (step 3). The resulting fluorescent quinoxalinone derivatives are analyzed by RP-HPLC as described in the text (step 4).
|
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. DMB analysis of sialic acid standards from BSM. (A) BSM subjected to steps 2 to 4 shown in Fig. 3. (B) After treatment of BSM in step 2, base hydrolysis of O-acetyl esters was carried out prior to completion of steps 3 and 4. Note the relative increase of the Neu5Ac peak to Neu5Gc after base treatment, indicating the conversion of O-acetylated sialic acids to Neu5Ac. The identities of the unshaded peaks in this and succeeding figures are unknown.
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. NeuO is responsible for the majority of O-acetylated polysialic acid in E. coli K1. The indicated strains were subjected to DMB analysis as shown in Fig. 3. The percentages (relative to Neu5Ac) of O-acetylated sialic acids in panels A to E are 1.9, 16.4, 3.1, 4.0 and 35.2, respectively. The quantitative data supporting the relative percentages are presented in a file, designated DMB labeling, that is freely available at www.cvm.uiuc.edu/path/sialobiology.
|
A second O acetylation pathway for monomeric sialic acid. Lewis et al. (24) reported that a mutation in the GBS neuA orthologue resulted in accumulation of Neu5,7Ac2, Neu5,8Ac2, and Neu5,9Ac2, suggesting that NeuA normally out-competes NeuD or other O-acetyltransferases for Neu5Ac substrate. Alternatively, loss of the NeuA* esterase activity in this mutant might have accounted for the increase in acetylated forms (52). If a similar pathway is operable in E. coli K1, loss of NeuA in a mutant also lacking sialic acid aldolase (NanA) should result in accumulation of acetylated sialic acids (Fig. 1). Elimination of NanA would be necessary to detect this phenotype because in a neuA mutant the increased pool of Neu5Ac binds NanR repressor, leading to induction of the nanATEKyhcH catabolic operon and destruction of intracellular sialic acids (22, 29, 30).
When a whole-cell extract (sonicate) of the nanA neuA double mutant EV715 was subjected to DMB analysis, four peaks other than free Neu5Ac were observed (Fig. 6A). On the basis of BSM-derived standards (Fig. 4A) and analogy to the results of tandem electrospray mass spectrometry (24), the three peaks eluting with retention times greater than the Neu5Ac peak represent Neu5,7Ac2, Neu5,8Ac2, and Neu5,9Ac2, respectively. Confirmation that these peaks were derived from O-acetylated sialic acids was shown by sensitivity to mild-base treatment carried out prior to DMB-labeling (Fig. 6B). Note the increase in the ratio of peak c (Neu5Ac) to peak a in Fig. 6B, indicating conversion of O-acetylated sialic acids to Neu5Ac. Peak a, with the earliest retention time, eluted even before Neu5Gc (Fig. 4A), suggesting that it might be the 8-carbon
-keto sugar acid KDO (34). Spiking a sample of the EV715 extract with Neu5Gc prior to DMB analysis resulted in the addition of one new peak to the profile (Fig. 6C), showing that peak a was not Neu5Gc. Chromatography of derivatized KDO, Neu5Gc, or KDO plus Neu5Gc unambiguously confirmed that peak a was derived from KDO (not shown). We assume that KDO in the intracellular extracts results from partial release of free KDO during acid treatment from lipopolysaccharide present as contaminating membrane material. However, some kps genes (kpsF and kpsU) have been shown to function in the KDO biosynthetic pathway, warranting future studies of KDO metabolism in E. coli K1 strains. Because free sialic acid is not detectable by colorimetric or amperometric methods in wild-type E. coli K1 (29), we concluded that loss of NeuA allows accumulation of sufficient free Neu5Ac in a nanA mutant background to produce a detectable pool of acetylated forms, which by analogy to GBS may result from the action of NeuD (Fig. 1). Note that the combined amount of diacetylated forms is at least twice that of the intracellular Neu5Ac concentration (Fig. 6A). Although the concentration of all sialic acid derivatives was reduced in the nanA+ neuA mutant, EV716, acetylated forms were still detectable (Fig. 6D). We assume that the known relative resistance of acetylated sialic acids to sialate aldolase encoded by nanA accounts for this observation (32).
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Intracellular accumulation of O-acetylated sialic acids in E. coli K1 neuA mutants. Intracellular sialic acids from the unencapsulated E. coli K1 mutant EV715 (nanA neuA) and its isogenic nanA+ derivative EV716 were subjected to DMB analysis (panels A and D, respectively). Sialic acids from strain EV715 were treated with base to demonstrate the presence of O-acetyl esters (B) or supplemented with 20 pmol of Neu5Gc prior to the analysis (C). Peaks a to f represent the relative elution of quinoxalinone derivatives of KDO, Neu5Gc, Neu5Ac, Neu5,7Ac2, Neu5,8Ac2 and Neu5,9Ac2, respectively.
|
-keto acid that most likely results from sialic acid accumulation and subsequent NanA cleavage during polysialic acid biosynthesis (Fig. 7F). Finally, to determine if activation of sialic acids protects acetylated forms from NeuA*, we analyzed an extract from strain EV136 that accumulates CMP-Neu5Ac due to a NeuS polymerase defect (29, 38, 51). Although the free Neu5Ac peak resulting from acid hydrolysis of CMP-Neu5Ac in this extract was apparent, acetylated forms were not detected, indicating that if acetylated sialic acids are activated by the synthetase, NeuA* deacetylates them prior to DMB labeling (Fig. 7G). We conclude from the results shown in Fig. 5 to 7 that the monomeric O-acetyltransferase, probably NeuD (23), produces diacetylated sialic acids that are normally deacetylated by NeuA* or nonspecific esterase (Fig. 1). As shown in Fig. 5, only a small percentage of the acetylated monomers are ever incorporated into capsular polysialic acid (Fig. 5). This is a major distinction with the NeuD catalyzed pathway in GBS, where 50 to 60% of O-acetylated monomeric sialic acids are added to the streptococcal polysaccharide (23, 24).
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Endogenous NeuA* prevents intracellular accumulation of O-acetylated sialic acids in vivo. Wild type or the indicated mutants were grown under the specified conditions and intracellular -keto acids analyzed by DMB labeling and RP-HPLC. (A) Growth in nonsupplemented LB shows presence of contaminating Neu5Ac but lack of exogenous O-acetylated sialic acids. (B) Growth in nonsupplemented minimal medium shows expected absence of Neu5Ac in a K-12 strain lacking kps and neu genes. (C) Growth in supplemented minimal medium showing uptake and accumulation of Neu5Ac. (D) Growth of the triple mutant in nonsupplemented minimal medium. (E) Growth of the triple mutant in supplemented minimal medium. (F) Growth of the wild type in nonsupplemented LB. (G) Growth of the polymerase mutant in nonsupplemented LB.
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Detection of NeuA* in vitro. Extracts of EV715 were treated or not with purified recombinant K1 NeuA under the specified conditions prior to DMB analysis. (A) NeuA added for 30 min at 37°C before labeling. (B) Extract treated as in panel A with heat-inactivated (90°C for 5 min) NeuA. (C) Extract treated as described in panel A but with half the amount of NeuA. (D) Extract held on ice for 5 h compared to a sample of the sample extract incubated at 37°C for 5 h prior to analysis.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Relative esterase activities of various NeuA forms and Pm1710 against pNP-Ac
|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Sequence alignment of four conserved blocks in the SGNH-hydrolase family. Blocks I, II, III, and V found in enzymes of the SGNH-hydrolase family (2) are shown boxed, including the NeuA* domains of GBS and K1 NeuA; the esterase encoded by P. multocida open reading frame pm1710; E. coli thioesterase I (TesA), accession no. AAC37396; and human PAF-AH, accession no. AAH07863. Other accession numbers are given in Table 2. Single-letter amino acid designations are used, and the numbering in parentheses indicates the relative positions of each block to the N terminus. Note that block I is always found at the N terminus of esterases, consistent with its relative positions in Pm1710, TesA, and PAF-AH. Note that in the two CMP-sialic acid synthetases, the esterase domains are located at the C termini of these bifunctional enzymes. Conserved residues are in boldface, where asterisks indicate catalytic residues.
|
|
|
|---|
Human serum contains over 30 times less O-acetylated sialic acid than Neu5Ac (18), which may explain why an obligate human commensal like H. influenzae lacks a pm1710 homologue despite the functional expression of other nan catabolic genes (44). Note that H. influenzae neuA encodes the short form of the synthetase (Table 2), suggesting that it does not modify its surface with O-acetylated sialic acids. Because most E. coli strains do not synthesize or activate sialic acids, and therefore lack neuA, the NeuA* physiological substrates in E. coli K1 may be the monomeric O-acetylated sialic acids produced during sialic acid synthesis, which requires NeuC (epimerase), NeuB (synthase), and NeuD (Fig. 1), instead of environmentally derived sialic acids. The niche of the human and animal large intestine occupied by E. coli K1 and other E. coli is a complex and poorly understood microbial environment that includes a diverse set of organisms expressing sialidases, sialyl O-acetyl esterases, and other catabolic enzymes directed against mucins and mucin-derived monosaccharides (8-10), suggesting that the E. coli nan system may primarily scavenge Neu5Ac instead of O-acetylated forms. However, over half of all mucin sialic acid residues are O acetylated (8-10), suggesting that E. coli K1 NeuA* may confer a selective advantage over other E. coli lacking the esterase. For example, in a study of healthy pregnant females, E. coli K1 was the most prevalent aerobic species in 38% of the participants (31), indicating that it may express specialized colonization factors such as efficient deacetylation of environmental sialyl O-acetyl monomers. The temperature dependence of capsule synthesis and nicotinamide auxotrophy of many K1 strains also may indicate ongoing adaptation to an animal environment (48), in which case NeuA* could play an important role in colonization and persistence.
Contribution of the monomeric O acetylation pathway to capsule modification. Although NeuA*-sensitive O-acetylated sialic acids accumulate in a neuA mutant, most of the acetylated sialic acids in the capsule are derived from the NeuO-catalyzed pathway. However, 2 to 4% of residues in polysialic acid are O acetylated by the NeuO-independent pathway, indicating that all E. coli K1 stains, regardless of CUS-3 status, contain a small amount of modified residues. The apparent synthesis and reconversion of most O-acetylated monomeric sialic acids to Neu5Ac would seem to be a wasteful or nonessential process (Fig. 1). However, E. coli serotype O104 (Table 2) synthesizes O-acetylated monomeric sialic acid as a structural component of lipopolysaccharide (15). NeuA* offers a mechanism to regulate the degree of acetylation by controlling the concentration of O-acetylated sialic acids available for surface modification. In contrast, no O acetylation of sialic acid was reported for the E. coli O145 serotype (14), suggesting that there may be differences in the relative activity of NeuA* or activity of NeuD in some strains. In GBS the relative concentration of O-acetylated monomeric sialic acids is low unless the neuA orthologue is inactivated (24). Although Lewis et al. (24) ascribed this phenotype to a competition between the synthetase and O-acetyltransferase encoded by neuD (23), our results support NeuA* as the molecular explanation for the accumulation of O-acetyl forms in an E. coli K1 neuA mutant. Indeed, it is unclear how the levels of GBS polysaccharide O acetylation reported could occur in the presence of NeuA*, unless the activity of this enzyme in GBS is less than in E. coli K1. In vitro comparisons of NeuA* proteins from E. coli K1 and GBS against the model esterase substrate pNP-Ac indicate that the E. coli esterase is relatively more active (52).
Similarly, the groups C, Y, and W-135 meningococcus neuA homologues lack the genetic information to code for NeuA*, and the degree of O acetylation in these strains is 90%, 47%, and 66%, respectively (21), which is much higher than in E. coli K1 strains lacking neuO. Meningococcal strains also lack NeuD (Table 2), supporting the negative correlation between the degree of acetylation and NeuA*. In contrast to these NeuA*-negative meningococcal strains, the degree of capsule acetylation in E. coli K1 CUS-3+ strains may approach 100% (28) despite the simultaneous occurrence of sialyl O-acetyl esterase. Our current results show that capsule O acetylation is largely dependent on neuO. That NeuO acetylates polymeric instead of monomeric sialic acid (19) presumably accounts for the lack of an effect of NeuA* on the degree of polysialic acid O acetylation, since it is as yet unclear whether NeuA* recognizes O-acetylated polysialic acid. However, the degree of E. coli K1 polysialic acid acetylation is strain specific (13, 19, 28). Sialic acids from stains lacking neuO either due to mutation or naturally because they are not CUS-3 lysogens contain few O-acetyl esters. In contrast, CUS-3 lysogens expressing neuO in the "on" form vary over a wide range in the degree of acetylation (28), which may not be solely dependent on the stochastic proportion of cells in the "off" form (13). How or even whether the degree of acetylation is affected during host colonization relative to that observed in cells grown in vitro, as in the current study, provides fertile new ground for investigating the biological functions of variable capsule modification in the context of the host-microbe interaction.
Function of the NeuD-catalyzed pathway.
Our results indicate that the NeuD-catalyzed addition of O-acetyl esters to Neu5Ac is a continuous process in E. coli K1 but that NeuA* limits accumulation of O-acetylated forms or their incorporation into capsule. However, while neuD+ (pRS361) complemented a
neuD mutant (RS2887) for sialic acid synthesis, the plasmid did not result in detectable O-acetylated sialic acids when expressed in strain EV78 grown in sialic acid-supplemented medium (not shown). Thus, while NeuD is the most likely candidate for the E. coli K1 sialyl O-acetyltransferase, our results do not provide direct evidence for this conclusion despite the recent observation that K1 NeuD appears to acetylate Neu5Ac in GBS (23). Note that Lewis et al. (23) did not identify acetyl-coenzyme A as the presumed two-carbon donor nor demonstrate biochemically that either K1 or GBS NeuD functions as an acetylase in vitro. Both of these biochemical conditions have been demonstrated for NeuO (13). It may be that NeuD requires interaction with other kps or neu gene products in order to be an active O-acetyltransferase, and a direct interaction between NeuD and NeuB has been demonstrated in vivo (11). However, in unpublished experiments, plasmids expressing neuBAC or neuDBAC in EV78 did not produce detectable intracellular Neu5Ac, suggesting that stoichiometry or interactions with still other gene products not present in the K-12 background may be critical. Evidence that O-acetylated monomers are not necessarily protected from NeuA* upon activation by the synthetase domain was evident from the phenotype of EV136 shown in Fig. 7G. This mutant has a defect in neuS and accumulates high intracellular concentrations of CMP-Neu5Ac (29, 38) but no detectable O-acetylated forms, suggesting that K1 NeuA either does not activate acetylated monomers or, if so, then they, too, must be NeuA* substrates. However, because GBS NeuA clearly activates O-acetylated Neu5Ac, the low incorporation of NeuO-independent acetylated sialic acids in polysialic acid presumably reflects the efficiency of NeuA* and, perhaps, the efficiency of the polymerization process (39). It will be interesting to determine whether NeuA* is active against O-acetylated polysialic acid. Our current results suggest that the small but constant amount of NeuO-independent acetylation of polysialic acid may be a target for potential vaccination against all K1 strains.
Finally, the NeuD-catalyzed O acetylation pathway may be irrelevant to the biology of E. coli K1. This possibility follows from the bifunctional nature of neuD, where in addition to its acetylase activity, NeuD is required for sialic acid synthesis (12). Dissection of these two functions has been accomplished for GBS NeuD by site-directed mutagenesis, resulting in loss of the acetylase activity but retention of the sialic acid biosynthetic phenotype (23). Therefore, it may be that only the biosynthetic function of NeuD is important in E. coli K1. The situation where only one of two biochemical functions is important to polysialic acid biosynthesis might be analogous to KpsF, which is enzymatically active in KDO-precursor biosynthesis (27) but also includes a cystathionine-ß-synthase or Bateman domain (5) that is now understood to bind adenosine ligands and function in a variety of cellular regulatory phenomena (33). E. coli kpsF mutants are defective in export of polysialic acid that accumulates intracellularly (7). Thus, the enzymatic functions of NeuD and KpsF may be of little or no relevance to polysialic acid synthesis or its in vivo functions. In either case our results indicate that the metabolism of microbial monomeric and polymeric sialic acids is far more complex than previously thought. The absence of at least some of these metabolic processes in mammals suggests new targets for potential drug or vaccine development (47-49).
We thank Kerry Helms for expert photographic assistance. We are grateful to Mark and Theresa Kuhlenschmidt for technical training in the use of the Dionex HPLC components used for analysis of DMB-labeled
-keto compounds, and Richard Silver for stimulating discussions. We gratefully acknowledge the kind gifts of BSM or O-acetylated standards from T. Corfield, T. Warner, and R. Schauer and to U. Rutishauser for pEndo-N.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»