Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, September 2006, p. 6539-6543, Vol. 188, No. 18
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00561-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan,1 National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Okazaki Institute for Integrative Bioscience, National Institute for Basic Biology, Higashiyama, Myodaiji, Okazaki 444-8787, Japan,2 The Institute of Enzyme Research, The University of Tokushima, 2-24 Shinzou, Tokushima 770-8501, Japan,3 Prefectural University of Hiroshima, Department of Life Sciences, 562 Nanatsuka, Shobara, Hiroshima 727-0023, Japan4
Received 19 April 2006/ Accepted 27 June 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
As a result of an evolutionary reduction of genome size, the Buchnera genome contains only 600 kbp, which is about one-seventh of the Escherichia coli genome and which suggests that Buchnera lacks many of the essential genes for the autogenous life. In fact, Buchnera lacks most of the genes required not only for the biosynthesis of cell surface components, substrate-specific receptors, and membrane transporters but also for two-component regulatory systems. Compare the genes in Buchnera to those in E. coli; 3 versus 190 for ABC transporters, 5 versus 52 phosphotransferase system genes, and 0 versus 88 genes for two-component response regulators (14). Clearly, Buchnera needs ways of obtaining nutrients from the host, but little is known about the import system.
The Buchnera genome contains flagellar genes, although the cells are nonmotile. Why does the nonmotile Buchnera retain a large set of flagellar genes? Are they being coopted for some other use? In the present study we show that the flagellar genes are expressed, and the proteins are integrated into the flagellar hook-basal body (HBB). The HBB seems to be an evolutionally degenerated form of the flagellum that has lost motility function. However, to our surprise, the number of HBBs is on the order of hundreds per cell, indicating that the structures are unlikely to be a nonfunctional remnant but rather form an actively functioning apparatus. We discuss the possibility that the flagellar apparatus may be involved in the transport of proteins between the symbionts.
|
|
|---|
Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and sequencing. Twenty-six sets of primers were constructed, according to the genome sequence of Buchnera, to generate specific fragments for flagellar genes. The genes (forward primer/reverse primer/predicted length of the transcript, in base pairs) were as follows: fliE (TAATTTGTTAGACGCACAAAAAAAAGACAG/TGTTGACTCATAATTTCTTGATAAGCTGAT/246), fliF (AATGGGGGAAAGTAAGAATCTACATGATGA/ATCACCCTGGCCTCCAAATAAAATATCTAT/306), fliG (GCGTTGTTATTAATGGCAATAGGTTCTGAT/TTTCTAAAGCCTCTTTTAAAAGAGACGTGC/271), fliH (AAGAGGGTGTTTTCTTAAAAAAACCACAGT/AAATAAGACGACATAATTGCTGCCATCTAG/213), fliI (GAGGTGGTAGGATTGAACACATCTATTGGT/TTAGGCAATTGATCTAATGGTTGACCTCAG/288), fliJ (ATTAATATTAGGTGTGTCGGTACATCAATG/GAATATGACTATCATTGATAATTGCGTCCT/249), fliK (TAAAATCAATCCCATGATCAGTAAAAGACA/AGGCATATAACTGTCTAAAAATGTTTTGAC/307), fliM (AATGGGGGAAAGTAAGAATCTACATGATGA/ATCACCCTGGCCTCCAAATAAAATATCTAT/289), fliN (AGATGTTGACAAAAATTTATTACCCCAAGA/ACTACAATTTCTCCAGATGCAATTAAATGA/257), fliP (AGTCATTTGCATACGTTTCCGTCTAATTCA/AGAAATGCTGGAAGAAAAGTCAGAGATGTC/299), fliQ (TAATGCTATGAAAGTTGCCTTGATTATTGC/TGCATATAATCCAGCATAACACCTAACATC/201), fliR (TCTGTTGCACCTATTTTTAAGGAAAAACTG/AACGAGATATTATAGAGGTGCCAATTTGAC/301), flhB (TGCGGATTCGTCAAGCAATGAAAGCTGTTA/CCAAACCCATGCTAAAACTTCTGCAACAGC/321), flhA (AAACAACTCAAT GGCAAATACTTGCTGGTC/GACCAAACGATTCAATTACTCTTCCTG CTG/303), flgN (CTTTAGAACGAATATTAAAACAAGAATGTC/ACAGATTTTTTATATGATGAAGACAATTCT/325), flgA (TACAATCAATTCGGTCAGTGCAACTGTTCA/GTTCCTCGGGGAATTTTTCTATTCGCTACA/302),flgB (TTGTTCTCAAGACAAGAAATATTATCTGCT/TCAATTCTTTCTCTATCCATATTTACGGTG/260), flgC (ATTGCAGGTTCAGCTATGATTGCACAATCG/CCTGGTAGCTTCTTGCTGCTGCGATATTAT/322), flgD (GGAATGCAAAAACTAAACAATACCGTGGAT/ACCATCCCAAAAGAA ATTATGTCTACCAGC/273), flgE (TGAAACTGGACGAGATTTGGATTTAGGAAT/TAGTTTGTTGTCAGAATTATCCACACTGCT/328), flgF (TGCGTTGTTATTAATGGCAATAGGTTCTGA/CGTGCCTTTTTTTTCTCCTAATGCTTTAGT/246), flgG (ATGGATTTCTAAAACTGGTCTTGATGCTCA/AGCATCTGTTTTTGAAAGATTACCCTGAGT/227), flgH (TTCGGCTTAAAAATCGCACCTCGACAATAA/CAATACGTGCATCAGCTATTTC AGTGGATG/319), flgI (AAAAAATGTAGCAGCAGTAATTGTAACGGA/TATCTATTTCTCGTTCAATTGTTGCACCGT/290), flgJ (GAACTTAAAT ACCAAGTTCGTATTAATCCA/TTACTTATTTCTTGAGATAATTGTTGG TCA/194), and flgK (CGCTATTTCTGGTATGAATGCAATGAAGAT/AGCTGCTTCGATTTTAGTTGTTCATCTTGA/239). Using total RNA extracted from aphids as a template, we synthesized cDNA with random hexamers by using the SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Gibco-BRL). The cycling parameters were as follows: 96°C for 3 min, followed by 94°C for 30 s, 58°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 1 min for 25 cycles, and finally 72°C for 10 min. The resultant PCR products were analyzed on 2% agarose gels, and their sequences were determined by the direct cycle sequencing method.
Electron microscopic observation of negatively stained Buchnera cells. Buchnera cells were put onto a grid, negatively stained with 1% sodium phosphotungstate (pH 6.5), and observed with a transmission electron microscope (JEM-1010; JEOL, Japan). Micrographs were taken at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV.
Proteome analysis of Buchnera. Buchnera cells were purified from about 500 bacteriocytes and lysed in 250 µl rehydration buffer consisting of 6 M urea, 2% CHAPS {3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate}, 0.5% IPG buffer (pH 4 to 7), 0.01% bromophenol blue, and 0.28% dithiothreitol. A total of 200 µl of lysate was applied to an Immobiline DryStrip (11 cm long, pH 4 to 7; Amersham Biotech). After first-dimensional isoelectric focusing, the gel was subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) using a 12.5% polyacrylamide separating gel. The gel was stained with Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) R-250, and about 50 of the strongly staining protein spots were cut out and in-gel digested with trypsin. The masses of the peptide fragments were analyzed on a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight/mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/MS). Proteins were identified by using the MASCOT program against the Buchnera genome database (http://www.buchnera.gsc.riken.go.jp).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (8K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Organization of the flagellar genes on the chromosome of Buchnera aphidicola sp. strain APS. The genome size is 640,681 bp and holds 583 genes. Flagellar genes are densely packed in three clusters on the genome. Arrows indicate the directions of transcription.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Comparison of Buchnera and Salmonella flagellar gene productsa
|
![]() View larger version (74K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Detection of flagellar gene expression by RT-PCR. Transcripts of 26 flagellar genes were amplified by RT-PCR with the specific primers listed in the text and electrophoresed on 2% agarose gel. +, PCR after RT; , PCR without RT. M, molecular markers of 100-bp ladder. OmpF is the positive control.
|
![]() View larger version (78K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Two-dimensional electrophoretic profile of Buchnera proteins. Buchnera cells isolated from bacteriocytes were lysed in rehydration buffer, and the aliquot was applied onto an Immobiline DryStrip (pI 4 to 7). After isoelectric focusing, followed by SDS-12.5% PAGE, peptide mass fingerprinting analysis by using MALDI-TOF/MS was performed. The largest spot was MopA, a GroEL-like 60-kDa chaperonin. Numbers: 1, FlgE; 2, FlgG; 3, DnaK; 4, RpsA; 5, MopA, 6, TufB; 7, OmpF-like protein.
|
Knowing that the flagellar genes are expressed, we expect to find flagellar structures assembled on the cell surface, and hence we examined intact Buchnera cells isolated from bacteriocytes by transmission electron microscopy. Cells appeared partially translucent (Fig. 4) when stained with 1% sodium phosphotungustate. Either membranes were breached by a slight osmotic shock into the staining solution and/or are simply the Buchnera since the outer membrane lacks the porins. There were no filamentous structures observed on the cell surface. Instead, we observed hundreds of structures that span between the inner and outer membranes (Fig. 4). The structure resembles the flagellar basal body, with MS- and PL-ring complexes and rods penetrating them. Some particles have a hook-like structure, albeit too short to curve, that extends from the PL-ring complex (Fig. 4, insets). The dimensions of these features are similar to those of Salmonella (3, 10). Our images are evidence that the expressed flagellar genes are assembled into flagellar HBBs. It should be noted that the Buchnera HBB is peritrichously distributed and that our count of a few hundred particles on the periphery of the cell in Fig. 4 provides an estimate of at most a thousand HBBs per cell.
![]() View larger version (173K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Electron micrograph of the negatively stained Buchnera. A Buchnera whole cell shows that the periphery is covered with HBBs. Insets: A and B, enlarged views of the peripheral area of the cell surface; C and D, typical HBB-like particles are further enlarged. Buchnera organisms isolated from the bacteriocyte were stained with 1% sodium phosphotungstate. The specimen was observed by transmission electron microscopy. The scale bar for the main image is 500 nm; the scale bars for insets A and B is 100 nm and for insets C and D is 20 nm.
|
|
|
|---|
We have found hundreds of HBBs on the cell surface of Buchnera. The HBBs are peritrichously distributed over the surface. Since there are no master genes that control the flagellar number in peritrichously flagellated species such as E. coli and Salmonella, Buchnera flagellar proteins might be constitutively expressed, distributed, and assembled in the membrane without control. Why are so many HBBs necessary for Buchnera? Buchnera is nonmotile, and the flagella lack the essential components of motility such as a filament (the propeller) and the Mot complex (the stator of the motor). These facts suggest that the Buchnera HBBs may have functions distinct from motility. The most plausible function is protein transporter, as the flagellar apparatus belongs to the family of T3SSs (1, 4, 6, 11, 16).
The T3SS proteins that are secreted do not have signal sequences and are thus secreted without cleavage. In other bacterial species such as Salmonella, the flagellar HBB complex exports the flagellar proteins that form the rod, hook and filament; the other T3SS structures secrete effectors of virulence in order to invade the host. The appearance of the rod and part of the hook in Buchnera is evidence that the HBB complex can function to export proteins. Considering the reduced genome size of Buchnera, which lacks the full set of genes encoding the membrane transporters, we suggest that the Buchnera HBB is a plausible candidate for an export apparatus to transfers Buchnera proteins to the host. Can the HBBs export proteins other than flagellar proteins? There is evidence that some virulence factors are also secreted through the flagellar secretion apparatus in Yersinia (16), but more examples are necessary to support this hypothesis.
There is an ATPase at or near the gate of the flagellar export apparatus; it is thought to unfold proteins to be secreted or to insert them into the axial export channel. However, the energy of transport itself has not been identified. One candidate of the energy source is the membrane potential. The pI values of the HBB components are mostly basic (9.0 to 10.0), whereas those of Salmonella are acidic (4.0 to 5.0) (15; see also Table 1). This is also true for the whole Buchnera proteins, suggesting that the electrostatic environment, especially the membrane potential, of Buchnera may be quite different from that of other bacteria. It will be interesting to determine the polarity of the electric potential in Buchnera. We believe that the reason for the abundance of the HBB on the surface of Buchnera will be apparent once we determine the function they perform.
This study was supported by a grant-in-aid for scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Technology of Japan (M.M.) and by the Softnano-machine project, Japan Science and Technology Agency (S.A.).
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»