Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, November 2006, p. 7335-7343, Vol. 188, No. 21
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00599-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University, SUNY at Binghamton, Binghamton, New York 13902,1 Department of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-05242
Received 27 April 2006/ Accepted 28 July 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the genes involved in biofilm dispersion are not as clearly defined as those required for biofilm formation, some recent progress has been made concerning the molecular basis underlying this phenomenon. Recent evidence suggests that global regulation of the central carbon flux by the RNA-binding protein CsrA plays a role in biofilm formation and dispersion of Escherichia coli (24-25). The effects of CsrA are mediated largely through the collective regulation of intracellular glycogen biosynthesis and central carbon metabolism, activation of flagellum biosynthesis, and motility (4, 24-25, 36, 58). Recent evidence also suggests that CsrA may play a role in the production of an adhesin. Wang and coworkers demonstrated that csrA disruption causes an
3-fold increase in the production of the polysaccharide adhesin PGA (poly-ß-1,6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine) as well as an increase in pga expression, indicating that CsrA destabilizes the pgaA transcript in vivo (54). There is no indication as to a similar role for CsrA homologues in other bacteria.
However, as detailed studies emerge, it is becoming clear that bacterial dispersion from mature biofilms triggered by environmental cues coincides with alteration of matrix components. Vats and Lee showed that a surface protein-releasing enzyme (SPRE) in Streptococcus mutans is actively involved in the degradation of attachment polymers on tooth surfaces, releasing bacteria into the bulk liquid (53). Addition of SPRE results in a 20% increase in the biofilm dispersion rate compared to that for control samples. However, until recently, it was unclear how modulation of matrix components was induced and how the signal was transduced within the cells to degrade polymers, reduce adhesiveness, and initiate biofilm dispersion. It is now widely accepted that cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP) signaling, first described to control extracellular cellulose biosynthesis in Gluconacetobacter xylinus (39-40), is involved in the modulation of matrix components, control of autoaggregation of planktonic cells, and biofilm formation in several microorganisms (30, 46, 51). In P. putida, two genes, PP0164 and PP0165, encoding a putative periplasmic protein and a putative transmembrane protein containing GGDEF and EAL domains, respectively, were found to be required for formation and starvation-induced dispersion of P. putida biofilms (17). These two proteins were found to regulate adhesion, probably via the adhesiveness of bacterial cells through c-di-GMP signaling (17) in a phosphorelay-mediated signaling event (43), as indicated by the finding that PP0164 mutant bacteria were unable to reduce their adhesiveness and disperse from biofilms in response to carbon starvation, while PP0165 mutant bacteria were unable to increase their adhesiveness and form biofilms (17). In S. oneidensis, a rapid cellular detachment from the biofilm occurred upon activation of yhjH, encoding an enzyme having phosphodiesterase activity which degrades c-di-GMP (50). In contrast, matrix attachment was shown to be dependent on mxdA, which encodes a cyclic bis(3',5')guanylic acid (c-di-GMP)-forming enzyme involved in c-di-GMP synthesis. The findings indicated that attachment might be controlled by exopolysaccharide (EPS) biosynthesis and increased adhesiveness via increased c-di-GMP levels while detachment is a result of reduced adhesiveness as well as controlled cessation or reduction of such activity due to reduced levels of c-di-GMP. However, it is unclear how environmental cues are sensed, resulting in the modulation of the enzymatic activities of a c-di-GMP-forming diguanylate cyclase(s) and of a c-di-GMP-hydrolyzing phosphodiesterase(s). Thormann et al. (50) proposed a mechanism in which environmental cues are sensed by a sensor protein(s), which modulates the enzymatic activities and, thus, c-di-GMP levels. However, no sensor protein(s) was identified in that study.
Here, we report the identification of a new, putative chemotaxis transducer protein that is involved in biofilm dispersion triggered by environmental cues that may link detachment and environmental cues to c-di-GMP levels. The protein encoded by PA1423 (herein termed bdlA for biofilm dispersion locus) has two PAS (Per-Arnt-Sint) domains that are essential for responding to environmental signals. Deletion of the gene resulted in the formation of biofilms that were not responsive to multiple environmental cues, such as succinate, glutamate, and various heavy metals that triggered dispersion of wild-type P. aeruginosa biofilms. Furthermore, deletion of bdlA resulted in biofilms having a higher relative hydrophobicity and higher c-di-GMP levels than wild-type biofilms. To our knowledge, this is the first study describing a locus in P. aeruginosa that is critical for sensing environmental cues that trigger biofilm dispersion. We propose a mechanism in which BdlA modulates intracellular c-di-GMP levels that affect the aforementioned processes.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Strains and plasmids used in this study
|
Biofilm formation. (i) Continuous-flow tube reactor. Biofilms were grown as described previously (43). Briefly, the interior surfaces of size 13 silicone tubing (Masterflex; Cole Parmer, Inc.) of a once-through continuous-flow tube reactor system were used to cultivate biofilms at 22°C for 5 days.
(ii) Flow cell biofilms. Biofilm architecture and development were studied by using flow cells as described previously (41, 47). Images of biofilms grown in once-through flow cells were viewed by confocal scanning laser microscopy using an LSM 510 Meta inverted microscope (Zeiss, Heidelberg, Germany). Images were obtained with an LD-Apochrome 40x/0.6 lens and with LSM 510 Meta software (Zeiss) and visualized using a live/dead BacLight stain from Invitrogen (Eugene, OR). Quantitative analysis of epifluorescence microscopic images obtained from flow cell-grown biofilms at the 5-day time point was performed with COMSTAT image analysis software (19).
(iii) Ninety-six-well microtiter dish assay. Initial biofilm formation was measured by using a 96-well microtiter dish assay system, as described previously (47).
Induction of biofilm dispersion. Biofilms were pregrown for 5 days in minimal medium containing 1.8 mM glutamate as the carbon source. After 5 days of biofilm growth, biofilm dispersion was induced by the addition of succinate (20 mM), Na3AsO3 (2 mM), AgNO3 (2 mM), or HgCl2 (2 mM) to the growth medium. Dispersion was indicated by an increase in turbidity at 600 nm in the effluent from the silicone tubing. The total numbers of viable bacteria in the effluent and the remaining biofilm were determined by serial plate counts on LB agar at 37°C.
Motility assays. Swimming and twitching motilities were assessed as described previously (47).
Microbial adhesion to hydrocarbon (MATH) test. To compare the relative hydrophobicities of P. aeruginosa wild-type and bdlA::Gm mutant strains, cell adherence to hexadecane was determined as described by Déziel et al. (13), except that 5-day-old biofilms were used.
One-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of membrane protein fractions and protein identification by mass spectrometry. Preparation of cell extracts and protein determinations were conducted as described previously (41, 43, 47). The membrane protein fraction was obtained by first removing broken cell debris and insoluble material by centrifugation at 36,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C, followed by ultracentrifugation at 150,000 x g for 60 min at 4°C. The membrane pellet was dissolved in Tris-EDTA buffer containing 1% CHAPS {3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate} and subsequently analyzed by one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Protein bands of interest were excised from the gel and digested in situ with trypsin by use of a ProGest workstation (Genomics Solutions, Inc., Michigan). The resulting tryptic peptides were analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry using an Ettan MALDI-TOF Pro mass spectrometer (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ) as described in detail previously (1). All proteins were identified with significant certainty (probability score of <0.02). Proteins were identified with 3 to 15 matched peptides and a minimum of 5% sequence coverage.
Extraction and quantification of c-di-GMP from P. aeruginosa wild-type and bdlA mutant biofilms. c-di-GMP was extracted from biofilms grown in tube reactors as described above. Biofilm cells were harvested after 5 days, centrifuged, and washed with phosphate-buffered saline. The pellets were then resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline. c-di-GMP was extracted by heat and ethanol in triplicate (2, 46) as follows. Cells were heated at 100°C for 5 min, and then ethanol was added to a final concentration of 65%. Samples were centrifuged, the supernatant was retained, and the extraction was repeated. Combined supernatants were dried using a SpeedVac. Dried samples were resuspended in 50 µl of 20 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer, vortexed, ultrasonicated, and centrifuged, and the supernatant was retained. This was repeated, and the supernatants were combined. Samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry using a QStar quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems) equipped with a nanospray ion source (Proxeon). c-di-GMP was detected via its fragmentation patterns as described by Thormann et al. (50). The extraction also contained GTP. Since the GTP concentration was shown to be 100-fold higher than the c-di-GMP concentration and was not affected by variation in the c-di-GMP concentration (38, 51), c-di-GMP was quantified by comparing the peak intensity of c-di-GMP to that of GTP. GTP (Sigma) was used as a control.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Induction of biofilm dispersion in isogenic PA1608::Gm, bdlA::Gm, and complemented bdlA::Gm mutant biofilms and P. aeruginosa wild-type (WT) biofilms. Biofilms were grown in a tube reactor, composed of size 13 tubing with an internal volume of 0.5 ml (tubing length, 1 m; flow rate, 0.05 ml/min) for 4 days in minimal medium containing 1.8 mM glutamate as the sole carbon source. The retention time of the biofilm tube reactor was 10 min. After 5 days of P. aeruginosa biofilm growth, biofilm dispersion was induced by a sudden 10-fold increase of the medium glutamate concentration. The effluent of untreated P. aeruginosa wild-type biofilms was used as a control.
|
Differences in dispersion are not related to fitness or colony morphology variance. We tested whether the lack of dispersion of bdlA mutant biofilms was due to altered growth rates or initial attachment. Compared to the P. aeruginosa wild type, the bdlA mutant strain showed no difference in doubling times in liquid culture (140 and 125 min, respectively) or in initial attachment (not shown). Furthermore, previous reports have linked biofilm dispersion in bacteria to the emergence of colony morphology variants (7, 31, 56). However, we did not observe differences in the colony morphologies of wild-type and bdlA mutant strains (data not shown).
BdlA is essential for biofilm dispersion induced by various environmental cues. To further elucidate the dispersion response, we determined whether the lack in biofilm dispersion of bdlA mutant biofilms was limited to sudden increases in the medium glutamate concentration or whether the lack in dispersion response was of a more general nature. Therefore, the effects of various other compounds known to act as chemoattractants and chemorepellents (9, 14, 33), including succinate as well as salts of Hg2+, Ag+, and As3+, were tested. The process of biofilm dispersion was determined by viable cell counts. As shown in Fig. 2B, less than 20% of biofilm cells were detected in the effluent of the bdlA::Gm mutant biofilms. This loss of biomass was similar to that for untreated bdlA::Gm biofilms used as controls. The highest viable counts compared to those for untreated bdlA mutant biofilms were detected upon treatment with succinate; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.6). In contrast, dispersion was induced in the P. aeruginosa wild-type biofilm cells independent of the environmental cue tested (Fig. 2A). On average, up to 80% of wild-type biofilm bacteria dispersed in the presence of compounds known to act as chemoattractants and chemorepellents in other systems (Fig. 2A). Similar results were observed when the effect of biofilm dispersion was determined by protein content (data not shown). Our findings indicate that reduction in viable cells per biofilm was not a result of killing or cell lysis but biofilm dispersion. Furthermore, our findings indicate that BdlA is essential for the dispersion response to environmental cues.
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Biomass distribution after induced dispersion in P. aeruginosa PAO1 (A) and the bdlA::Gm mutant (B). Biofilm dispersion was induced by the addition of 2 mM silver nitrate (AgNO3), mercury chloride (HgCl2), or sodium arsenate (NaAsO2) or by the addition of 20 mM succinate to the growth medium, and dispersed cells were collected. The remaining biofilm cells were harvested upon completion of the dispersion event. The biomass distribution was determined by calculating the ratio of the numbers of viable cells (CFU/ml) of the remaining biofilm population and of the dispersed biofilm population. Experiments were done in triplicate. Black bars indicate the biomasses (in percentages) of remaining biofilms postdispersion, and gray bars indicate the dispersed biofilm populations.
|
10-fold more bacteria in the bdlA mutant biofilm than in the wild-type biofilm) or reflect an intact biofilm structure/architecture conferring resistance.
Phenotypic characterization of the dispersion response.
To further investigate the biofilm architecture, biofilm formation was analyzed after extended growth by using a flow cell biofilm reactor system. The bdlA mutant was found to form biofilms with a distinct three-dimensional architecture. However, while the wild-type biofilm was composed of large, irregularly shaped microcolonies (Fig. 3A), the bdlA::Gm mutant biofilm displayed smaller, densely packed, and symmetrical microcolonies (Fig. 3B). Quantitative analysis of biofilm architecture using COMSTAT confirmed our observations, indicating that the bdlA mutant biofilm differed from the wild-type biofilm with respect to average and maximum thickness as well as total biomass (Table 2). However, when the total biomass and the total CFU/biofilm for the wild-type and bdlA mutant biofilms were determined, no difference was detected. Both wild-type and mutant biofilms generated similar biomasses (
2.25 mg) and CFU/biofilm (
8.1 x 1010), indicating that the distinct biofilm architecture of the bdlA::Gm mutant was not a result of a defect in biofilm formation.
![]() View larger version (82K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Microscopic characterization of the dispersion response. Confocal scanning laser microscopy images of biofilms, at a magnification of x400, of P. aeruginosa PAO1, the bdlA::Gm mutant, and the P. aeruginosa bdlA::Gm mutant complemented with an intact bdlA gene after 5 days of growth, showing the xy and xz planes. The microscopic images in panels A and C show the same P. aeruginosa wild-type biofilm before (A) and after (C) a nutrient-induced dispersion event, a sudden 10-fold increase of the glutamate. The microscopic images in panels B and D show the same P. aeruginosa bdlA::Gm mutant biofilm before (B) and after (D) a nutrient-induced dispersion event. The enlarged microscopic images shown in panel E show microcolonies of bdlA::Gm mutant biofilms complemented with an intact bdlA gene as well as pilA and flgB mutant biofilms.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. COMSTAT quantitative analysis of biofilm structures of P. aeruginosa wild-type and bdlA::Gm mutant strains before and after nutrient-induced dispersiona
|
Swimming and twitching motility does not affect the biofilm dispersion response. The mutant strain showed impaired twitching motility compared to that of the wild type (not shown), indicating that the altered bdlA mutant biofilm architecture may be a result of impaired twitching motility. This was confirmed by microscopy. The bdlA mutant biofilm architecture appeared similar to that of a twitching-motility-deficient P. aeruginosa mutant, which consisted of distinct microcolonies that were regularly spaced and nearly uniform in size (Fig. 3E) (18). Complementation of the bdlA mutant restored the wild-type twitching phenotype (not shown).
We previously demonstrated that biofilm dispersion in P. aeruginosa, triggered by carbon substrate availability, was associated with decreased expression of pilus (e.g., pilA) genes in dispersed cells (43). Since the bdlA mutant was impaired in twitching motility, we further elucidated the role of twitching in biofilm dispersion. To do so, we examined the three-dimensional structure of pilA mutant biofilms before and after nutrient-induced dispersion. As shown in Table 2, the pilA mutant biofilm dispersed in response to an increase in the nutrient concentration, indicating that the dispersion-deficient phenotype of bdlA was not related to twitching motility.
A proteomic analysis combined with peptide mass fingerprinting of membrane protein profiles of both wild-type and bdlA mutant strain biofilms indicated
6-fold-increased expression of the flagellar filament protein FliC (type B) in wild-type biofilms compared to bdlA mutant biofilms. The finding suggested reduced swimming motility of the bdlA mutant under biofilm growth conditions. However, no difference in swimming motility was detected under planktonic growth conditions by use of a swimming motility assay (not shown). Furthermore, we previously demonstrated that biofilm dispersion in P. aeruginosa, triggered by carbon substrate availability, was associated with increased expression of flagella (fliC) (43), suggesting an involvement of swimming motility in the dispersion response. We therefore determined whether the presence of flagellar and/or swimming motility is essential for the nutrient-induced dispersion response by using a nonmotile P. aeruginosa mutant strain (
flgB) and examining the three-dimensional biofilm structure before and after nutrient-induced dispersion. Interestingly, no difference in dispersion response was detected between the P. aeruginosa wild type and the flgB mutant. As shown in Table 2, the flgB mutant biofilm dispersed in response to an increase in the nutrient concentration.
We also determined whether flagellar rotation is essential for the nutrient-induced dispersion response. To do so, we tested whether the upper-tier chemotaxis regulator CheB controls the nutrient-induced dispersion response by use of an isogenic cheB mutant. This was based on the findings of several studies implicating the involvement of the phosphorelay regulators CheY and CheB in regulating the direction of flagellar rotation. We made use of a cheB mutant that was shown by Kato et al. (27) to change its swimming direction much more frequently than wild-type P. aeruginosa PAO1. No difference in the nutrient-induced dispersion response of the cheB mutant compared to that of the P. aeruginosa wild type was detected (Table 2). Overall, our data suggest that nutrient-induced biofilm dispersion may be mediated by a mechanism independent of flagellar rotation and flagellum-mediated motility.
The dispersion-deficient BdlA phenotype correlates with increased relative hydrophobicity and increased c-di-GMP levels.
Bacterial dispersion of biofilms in response to environmental cues was shown to coincide with a reduction in the adhesiveness of biofilm bacteria (17). To determine the adhesiveness of biofilm bacteria, we determined the relative hydrophobicities of both wild-type and bdlA mutant biofilms by using the MATH test as a measure of adhesiveness of bacterial cells. Biofilms were grown for 5 days, harvested, and immediately tested using the MATH assay. Overall, the bdlA mutant biofilm cells were found to be more hydrophobic (
38% ± 1.5% [standard deviation]) than the wild-type biofilm cells (
24% ± 1.9%) (P < 0.05). This finding suggested that the dispersion deficiency of the bdlA mutant might coincide with increased hydrophobicity and, thus, adhesiveness. We speculated that increased adhesiveness might be a result of increased c-di-GMP levels. To test this hypothesis, we examined the intracellular levels of c-di-GMP in both wild-type and bdlA mutant biofilms. c-di-GMP was extracted and quantified by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis as described in Materials and Methods. The same extraction also allowed us to simultaneously detect GTP. Since the GTP concentration was shown to be 100-fold higher than the c-di-GMP concentration and was not affected by variation in the c-di-GMP concentration (38, 51), c-di-GMP was quantified by comparing the peak intensity of c-di-GMP to that of GTP. Mass spectrometry analysis revealed that the peak intensity ratio between GTP and intracellular c-di-GMP was 18.2 (±2.5):1 in P. aeruginosa wild-type biofilms and 3.2 (±0.74):1 in bdlA mutant biofilms, indicating that the c-di-GMP level was much lower in wild-type than in bdlA mutant biofilm cells. Thus, by comparing the intracellular pools of GTP and c-di-GMP, we determined that bdlA mutant biofilms contained intracellular c-di-GMP levels that were about five- to sixfold higher than those in P. aeruginosa wild-type biofilms.
|
|
|---|
Cellular c-di-GMP levels have been implicated in bacterial biofilm formation, in most cases, via control of EPS production (23, 30, 37, 46, 51). Furthermore, it has been speculated that c-di-GMP signaling controls the transitioning between sessile and motile lifestyles. High c-di-GMP concentrations have been shown in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium to stimulate biofilm formation and EPS production (and thus, adhesiveness) but to suppress motility, while low concentrations inhibited biofilm formation, repressed the production of EPS, and stimulated swimming and swarming motilities (32, 38, 46). Recent evidence further supports the role of c-di-GMP signaling in regulating the transitioning between sessile and motile lifestyles. In P. putida, two genes have been shown to be involved in regulating bacterium:surface adhesion and, thus, starvation/oxygen-induced biofilm dispersion. These genes encode a putative transmembrane protein containing a GGDEF/EAL domain and a putative periplasmic protein (17). The intracellular level of cyclic-di-GMP is regulated through cyclases and phosphodiesterases harboring GGDEF/EAL domains. The mechanism by which these two proteins participate in biofilm dispersion is probably cyclic-di-GMP signaling (11, 15, 17, 46). Furthermore, a molecular analysis of S. oneidensis revealed two genes involved in shifting the state of a biofilm cell between attachment and detachment in a concentration-dependent manner (50). mxdA, encoding a cyclic bis(3',5')guanylic acid (c-di-GMP)-forming enzyme with an unusual GGDEF motif, was found to be essential for matrix attachment. In contrast, rapid cellular detachment from the biofilm occurred upon induction of yhjH, a gene encoding an enzyme possessing phosphodiesterase activity. Taken together, the findings from previous reports indicate that biofilm detachment coincides with low levels of c-di-GMP levels, reduced adhesiveness, and increased motility (6, 50).
Interestingly, bdlA mutant biofilms were characterized by high levels of c-di-GMP compared to levels from wild-type biofilms, enhanced adhesiveness as indicated by the MATH assay, and reduced swimming motility as indicated by the reduced production of the FliC protein. However, a direct role of BdlA in regulating the c-di-GMP level and thus biofilm dispersion in P. aeruginosa can be excluded since none of the amino acids found in the GGDEF/EAL domains are within BdlA. However, our data clearly indicate a role of BdlA in dispersion. While BdlA does not directly transduce biofilm dispersion in P. aeruginosa, our data suggest that BdlA may be involved indirectly in a signaling cascade within the cells that results in the modulation of bacterium:surface adhesion to initiate biofilm dispersion. Thus, we propose that BdlA may regulate or transduce biofilm dispersion and, as such, the adhesiveness indirectly via cyclic-di-GMP levels by acting as a sensor protein. The potential involvement of BdlA in a signaling cascade is based on the finding that the protein possesses similarities to chemotaxis transducer proteins (www.pseudomonas.com) and, although direct evidence for this notion is lacking, based on its cytoplasmic location and the signature MCP and two PAS redox-signaling domains. Proteins harboring PAS domains are all located in the cytosol and are important signaling modules that sense environmental factors that cross the cell membrane and/or affect cell metabolism, such as chemoattractants or chemorepellents, and monitor changes in light, redox potential, oxygen, and overall cellular energy status (5, 35, 48). Furthermore, the closest known homologue of BdlA was found to be Aer (PA1561). In E. coli, the PAS domain-containing Aer protein regulates the motile behavior of bacteria in gradients of oxygen, redox potential, and certain nutrients (5, 35). We therefore propose that BdlA is involved in sensing environmental cues, thus functioning as a sensor protein, which in turn modulates the enzymatic activity of a c-di-GMP-forming diguanylate cyclase(s) and/or a c-di-GMP-hydrolyzing phosphodiesterase(s), such as an EAL domain-containing protein(s). Figure 4 summarizes the involvement of BdlA as well as other key components and their mode of interaction in controlling the transitioning of biofilm cells between attachment and detachment. The model of detachment proposed here resembles that of Gjermansen et al. (17) and that of Thormann et al. (50).
![]() View larger version (7K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Model for role of BdlA as a sensor protein in controlling biofilm formation and biofilm dispersion/detachment by c-di-GMP in P. aeruginosa. Environmental cues, such as sudden changes in the succinate concentration, are sensed by BdlA, which modulates the enzymatic activity of a c-di-GMP-forming diguanylate cyclase(s) harboring GGDEF domains and/or of a c-di-GMP-hydrolyzing phosphodiesterase(s), such as an EAL domain-containing protein(s). At this point, it is unclear how BdlA modulates the activities of GGDEF- and/or EAL-harboring enzymes that result in alteration of the c-di-GMP levels. High intracellular c-di-GMP levels coincide with biofilm formation, while low levels coincide with biofilm dispersion/detachment. The model proposed here resembles that of Gjermansen et al. (17) and that of Thormann et al. (50).
|
Overall, our findings suggest that biofilm dispersion, like any other stage of biofilm development, is a dynamic, highly regulated process, controlled by a yet-uncharacterized hierarchical set of genes and triggered by particular environmental cues. Here, we demonstrated that only one gene product, BdlA, was essential to mediate the dispersion response to a variety of environmental signals, such as glutamate, succinate, and salts of silver, arsenite, and mercury. The dispersion-deficient phenotype was independent of colony variants and genes and proteins that have been reported to be involved in attachment and biofilm development. Furthermore, based on the similarity to Aer, BdlA may be involved in sensing and transducing signals within cells, resulting in the modulation of c-di-GMP levels, swimming motility, and adhesiveness of the bacterial cell surface.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»