Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, November 2006, p. 7862-7875, Vol. 188, No. 22
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00994-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Genetics, Adrian Building, University Road, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
Received 7 July 2006/ Accepted 8 September 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The large redox potential of the Fe2+/Fe3+ couple makes iron ideally suited as a redox cofactor, and as such it can be found complexed to a wide variety of enzymes in virtually all cell types (1). In the host, free iron is maintained at very low levels in order to restrict microbial growth, and invading microorganisms must possess the means for acquiring sufficient levels of this nutrient in order to survive and persist (19). However, the cellular toxicity of iron, resulting from participation as a Haber-Weiss-Fenton redox catalyst in the formation of toxic oxygen species, chiefly the highly deleterious hydroxyl radical and superoxide anion, requires that the uptake and storage of iron must be tightly regulated. In bacteria, this regulation is primarily coordinated by the ferric uptake repressor (Fur) protein, an iron-dependent transcriptional repressor of iron acquisition and storage genes (19). Fur has been most extensively studied in Escherichia coli, although homologues have now been described in many other species, including C. jejuni (60, 64). Fur-regulated genes possess a promoter-operator sequence, termed the Fur box, to which the Fe2+:Fur dimer binds under iron-replete conditions, preventing RNA polymerase binding to the promoter and thus repressing transcription (10). Common bacterial iron-scavenging strategies involve uptake systems that employ high-affinity extracellular iron-binding siderophores and their cognate membrane transport systems, ferrous iron transport proteins, transferrin and lactoferrin receptors, and systems involved in the acquisition of iron in the form of heme (1).
Due to the insolubility and toxicity of free Fe3+, intracellular iron in the host is mostly complexed to proteins in the form of hemin (15). For bacteria to acquire iron from hemoproteins, heme must first be removed from the protein complex. This process cannot be fulfilled by siderophores and may involve specific degradative enzymes. In some systems, a heme-sequestering protein, termed a hemophore, delivers heme to the cell surface receptor (16, 30). Examples of receptors for heme or major circulating hemoproteins include the hemoglobin/hemoglobin-haptoglobin receptor complex HpuAB from Neisseria meningitidis (30); the HasR heme receptor of Serratia marcescens, which can function with or without the cognate hemophore HasA (29); and the hemopexin receptor HxuA of Haemophilus influenzae (8). In gram-negative bacteria, heme transport across the outer membrane is energized by a TonB-ExbB-ExbD complex, whereas transport across the inner membrane proceeds by ATP hydrolysis involving an ABC (ATP-binding cassette) complex in conjunction with a periplasmic shuttle protein, and both the inner and outer membrane transport genes are frequently genetically linked (15). In eukaryotes, iron must be liberated from heme by a heme oxygenase (HO) in conjunction with an aerobic electron donor in order to oxidatively cleave the porphyrin backbone via successive
-meso-hydroxyheme and verdoheme intermediates to yield ferric biliverdin and carbon monoxide (CO). The subsequent release of iron from ferric biliverdin in eukaryotes requires a biliverdin reductase (31). Recently, the biochemistry of HO-dependent heme degradation was described for several important gram-negative pathogens. The HemO protein from Neisseria spp. yields ferric biliverdin and CO as end products although the mechanism of iron release from this complex is unknown (71). Unlike eukaryotic HOs and HemO, a study of the ChuS HO from E. coli O157:H7 suggested that the iron-free form of biliverdin together with CO were formed as end products of heme degradation (53). A third type of gram-negative HO homologue from Vibrio cholerae, termed HutZ, was shown to bind heme but not degrade it and may instead be involved in heme storage to prevent cellular toxicity rather than degradation (67).
Transcriptional profiling of the C. jejuni iron regulon has identified several iron-responsive genes under the control of the global iron-dependent repressor Fur, including a cluster of five genes, Cj1613c-Cj1617 (Fig. 1), proposed to be involved in heme iron acquisition (23, 39, 59). On the basis of sequence similarity to known outer membrane heme receptors, Cj1614 was designated chuA, while the Cj1615-17 genes show homology to the cognate inner membrane ABC transport and periplasmic binding components and were designated chuBCD (40). The hypothetical protein encoded by Cj1613c is arranged divergently to chuABCD. Previously, chuA was shown to be regulated by iron and Fur (60). Analysis of the intergenic region between Cj1613c and chuA reveals two 19-bp sites which align perfectly to the C. jejuni consensus Fur box sequences proposed by van Vliet et al. (59) and Palyada et al. (39). Here, we describe the iron- and Fur-dependent regulation of the Cj1613c-17 genes and their role in heme utilization in C. jejuni. We conclude that chuABCD likely represents the major transport genes, although additional loci may be involved in iron uptake from heme/hemoproteins. Furthermore, we demonstrate that degradation of heme requires the Cj1613c gene product, which functions as a heme oxygenase, and propose the redesignation of Cj1613c as chuZ.
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Map of the heme utilization gene cluster of C. jejuni NCTC 11168. Restriction sites used in Southern hybridization and primer binding sites used in PCR mapping are indicated. (Top) An expanded view shows the positions, distances (in base pairs), and sequences of the putative Fur boxes of Cj1613c and chuA.
|
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids
|
Molecular biology procedures. All restriction enzymes were purchased from New England Biolabs, and all DNA modification enzymes were obtained from Promega. DNA manipulation was performed using standard molecular biology techniques as described previously (43), unless otherwise stated. PCR was performed using an Eppendorf Mastercycler, and the oligonucleotide primers used are described in Table 2. High-fidelity PCR or amplification of target sequences greater than 3 kbp in length was performed using the Expand High Fidelity system (Roche). The isolation of plasmid DNA was performed using QIAGEN Qiaprep Spin Mini- and Midi-prep kits in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Genomic DNA was isolated from C. jejuni strains using the method described by Ausubel et al. (2). For Southern hybridization experiments, probes of approximately 200 to 300 bp for each of the Cj1613c-chuD genes were amplified and labeled with digoxigenin (DIG)-11-dUTP using the Roche PCR DIG labeling kit in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Hybridization and detection were performed as described in the Roche DIG applications manual. DNA sequencing was performed using the BigDye V3.1 Terminator kit on an ABI 377 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). DNA sequences were analyzed using Clone Manager Suite version 8 (Scientific and Educational Software). Transformation of E. coli and C. jejuni strains was achieved by electroporation using the methods of Ausubel et al. (2) and van Vliet et al. (58), respectively. Phylogenetic comparison of outer membrane receptor amino acid sequences was performed using the ClustalW algorithm (56) and an unrooted tree assembled from pair distances using PhyloDraw version 0.8 (Graphics Application Laboratory, Pusan National University; http://pearl.cs.pusan.ac.kr/phylodraw/).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Primers
|
chuA::cat), JDR6 (
chuB::cat), JDR7 (
chuC::cat), and JDR8 (
chuD::cat) (Table 1). Mutagenesis of Cj1613c was performed by insertional inactivation. The region encompassing Cj1613c from C. jejuni NCTC 11168 and flanking DNA had previously been cloned in pUC19 (pcam114b5) (40). A kanamycin resistance marker was excised from pJMK30 with BamHI and blunt-end treated with Pfu polymerase prior to ligation to BsaBI-digested pcam114b5 (Table 1). The resulting construct (pKAR1) was then used to transform C. jejuni NCTC 11168, and transformants were screened for allelic replacement of the wild-type gene as described above. The mutant strain generated (Cj1613c::kan) was designated C. jejuni KAR1 (Table 1).
Overexpression and purification of recombinant His(6)-Cj1613c.
The Cj1613c coding region was amplified with proofreading polymerase from C. jejuni NCTC 11168 genomic DNA using primer pair 1613TrcF and 1613TrcR (Table 2). The amplified product and vector pTrcHisB (Table 1) were simultaneously digested with EcoRI and PstI and ligated. The ligation was used to transform E. coli DH5
and clones harboring recombinant plasmids verified by sequencing prior to propagation in the expression host strain E. coli BL21. An overnight culture of strain BL21(pTrc1613) was diluted 1:100 into 500 ml of LB broth containing ampicillin and grown to an OD600 of 0.6. Recombinant protein expression was induced by addition of IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside) to a final concentration of 1 mM for 3 h at 30°C with shaking. Cells were then harvested and resuspended in 10 ml of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), containing mini-complete (EDTA) protease inhibitors (Roche). Lysis was achieved by addition of chicken egg white lysozyme to a final concentration of 100 µg/ml and incubation at 37°C for 1 h, followed by three rounds of sonication for 30 s each on ice. The cell lysate was centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 20 min and filter sterilized using a 0.45-µm-pore-size filter (Sartorius). Imidazole was added to a final concentration of 5 mM, and the recombinant protein was purified using the Ni2+-NTA system (Invitrogen) in accordance with the manufacturer's standard protocol. The purity of the recombinant protein was determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (43), and identification was confirmed by Western blot analysis using an anti-His antibody (Invitrogen) and sequencing (Protein and Nucleic Acid Chemistry Laboratory, University of Leicester). Purified protein fractions were pooled and dialyzed three times using Slide-A-Lyzer dialysis cassettes (molecular weight cutoff, 3,000; Pierce) in 1:500 volumes against 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8) at 4°C and quantified by colorimetry (4). The protein was finally concentrated using Microcon YM-10 microconcentrator columns (Millipore), and yields were typically in the range of 300 to 500 µg/ml.
Spectrophotometric analysis of heme binding and degradation by His6-Cj1613c. Binding studies based on the method of Wilks and Schmitt (63) were performed using 1-ml volumes of 20 µM His6-Cj1613c in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8) at 25°C. Hemin (2.5 mM in 20 mM NaOH) was titrated in 2.5 µM increments to a final twofold molar excess of hemin to protein, and the absorbance spectrum between 350 and 800 nm was recorded using a Cary 300 spectrophotometer (Varian) at a sampling rate of 300 nm/min. Prior to investigating the heme oxygenase capacity of Cj1613c, the heme-His6-Cj1613c complex formed as the end product of the previous binding studies was purified to remove excess heme by filtration using Microcon YM-10 columns and eluted in 1 ml of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8). To rule out the involvement of nonenzymatic H2O2-mediated conversion of heme to biliverdin, which has been reported for other heme-binding proteins, catalase (bovine liver) was added to a final concentration of 2 µM. Ascorbic acid was added as an electron donor to a final concentration of 20 mM, and spectra were recorded between 350 and 800 nm every 2 min for up to 1 h (6).
EMSAs and promoter activity assays. The target promoter region between Cj1613c and chuA was amplified using primers EMSACHUF and EMSACHUR (Table 2). Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) were conducted as described previously (23). The dissociation constant was calculated as follows: the change in intensity of the unshifted molecular species with increasing protein concentration was quantified by densitometry (GeneTools; Syngene), and the equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) was defined as the slope of the linear transformation plotted from log(bound/unbound) against log(unbound). Promoter activity experiments using a lacZ reporter were performed using the E. coli-C. jejuni shuttle plasmid pMW10 as described previously (62).
|
|
|---|
chuA::cat), JDR6 (
chuB::cat), JDR7 (
chuC::cat), JDR8 (
chuD::cat), and KAR1 (Cj1613c::kan) (Table 1). A phenotypic test was designed to determine the requirement for each gene during growth of C. jejuni where iron is present solely in the form of hemin or hemoglobin (Fig. 2). Control experiments using iron-replete and iron-restricted conditions showed no difference between the mutant and wild-type strains, and iron restriction severely inhibited growth of all strains. In the presence of a low (1 µM) concentration of hemin, all strains grew poorly, although the wild type appeared to grow slightly better than the mutant strains. In the presence of a high (50 µM) concentration of hemin or both low (0.25 µM) and high (12.5 µM) concentrations of hemoglobin, a clear difference between the mutant phenotypes could be observed: strains JDR5 and KAR1 (chuA and Cj1613c mutants) grew poorly, while strains JDR6, JDR7, and JDR8 (chuB, chuC, and chuD mutants) appeared to grow almost as well as the wild type. Statistical comparison (unpaired t test) of the chuA and Cj1613 mutants to the wild type showed both mutants to be significantly different from the wild type at 16 and 24 h in all assays where hemin or hemoglobin was added. These results demonstrate that growth in the presence of hemin or hemoglobin as a sole source of iron is highly dependent on chuA and Cj1613c; however, these genes may not be essential, as indicated by a small level of growth in the respective mutant strains in the absence of an alternative iron source. Most, but not all, comparisons of the chuB, -C, or -D mutants with the wild type are statistically different at 16 and 24 h (unpaired t test) in the presence of hemin or hemoglobin. However, by comparison with the chuA and Cj1613c mutants, mutation of chuBCD only partially compromises growth in the presence of hemin or hemoglobin as sole iron sources. Given the phenotype of the chuB, chuC, and chuD mutants in comparison to that of chuA, polarity is unlikely to be an issue; however, despite using a variety of genetic strategies, we have not been able to carry out a complementation analysis for the chuA mutant. Comparison of the growth of all strains in the presence of low hemin or hemoglobin concentrations (1 ferric molarity) reveals that hemin is less effective than hemoglobin at stimulating growth, and this may be due to either differences in substrate affinity or minor differences in substrate solubility in the growth media used.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Growth assays of heme utilization gene mutants. Samples were tested in triplicate, and the data plotted are the means of two independent experiments together with the sample error. Symbols: , wild-type strain NCTC 11168; JDR5; , JDR6; , JDR7; , JDR8; , KAR1 grown in MH broth supplemented with 40 µM Fe2(SO4)3 (iron replete), 20 µM desferrioxamine mesylate (iron restricted), 1 µM or 50 µM hemin, or 0.25 µM or 12.5 µM hemoglobin.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. C. jejuni genotyping and heme utilization phenotyping studies
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Growth assays of C. jejuni clinical isolates. C. jejuni strains NCTC 11168, 35503, 58436, and 61666 were tested for their ability to grow in iron-restricted (20 µM desferrioxamine mesylate) MH broth under iron-replete [40 µM Fe2(SO4)3] ( ) and iron-restricted ( ) conditions or in the presence of 50 µM hemin () or 12.5 µM hemoglobin ( ) as sole iron sources. Cultures were performed in triplicate, and the data plotted are the means of two independent experiments together with the sample error.
|
![]() View larger version (44K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Reporter gene assay and EMSA of the Cj1613c-chuA intergenic region. (a) Reporter gene assay of the chuA and Cj1613c promoter regions under differential iron conditions. LacZ activity was determined after strain 480-containing reporter constructs (Table 1) were cultured in MH broth under iron-restricted (20 µM desferrioxamine mesylate, low iron) or iron-replete [40 µM Fe2(SO4)3, high iron] conditions. Data presented are the means of triplicate sampling from two independent experiments with the standard error. (b) EMSA of the Cj1613c-chuA intergenic region with purified Fur protein. (Panel A) DIG-labeled DNA was present at 0.0775 nM. Lanes: 1, no FurCj protein; 2 to 8, labeled fragment incubated with 0.25 nM, 0.5 nM, 0.75 nM, 1 nM, 1.25 nM, 1.5 nM, and 1.75 nM FurCj, respectively. Bands were labeled I, II, III, and IV as described in the text. (Panel B) Self-competitive EMSA. Lanes: 1, labeled probe alone; 2, labeled probe with 1.5 nM FurCj; 3 to 6, labeled probe with 1.5 nM FurCj and 100-fold, 500-fold, 1,000-fold, or 1,500-fold excess unlabeled probe, respectively.
|
Biophysical analysis of the role of Cj1613c in hemin utilization.
Recently, bacterial HOs have been implicated as the major class of enzymes involved in degradation of heme by oxidative cleavage of the protoporphyrin ring to release iron via successive
-meso-hydroxyheme and verdoheme intermediates, finally yielding biliverdin and CO as by-products (6, 71). However, biochemical testing of the putative HO HutZ from V. cholerae indicated that although the purified recombinant protein could bind heme, it could not degrade it in the presence of an electron donor, and it was therefore suggested that this protein is involved in heme sequestration (67). The phenotype of the Cj1613 mutant indicates a role in heme utilization, and therefore the role of Cj1613c in heme binding and degradation was examined by investigating the interaction of Cj1613c with heme. Cj1613c protein was overexpressed as an N-terminal hexahistidine-tagged recombinant fusion protein in E. coli, and SDS-PAGE analysis showed that the protein could be purified to homogeneity by standard Ni2+-affinity chromatography with average yields of
1 to 2 mg ml1 (Fig. 5a). The ability of His6-Cj1613c to bind heme in vitro was determined by using absorbance spectroscopy. Titration with hemin resulted in the formation of a prominent Soret peak at 411 nm with a smaller peak at 573 nm and a shoulder at 540 nm corresponding to the
- and ß-porphyrin bands of the heme:His6-Cj1613c complex, respectively (Fig. 5b). The absorbance maxima at these wavelengths were achieved following addition of hemin to approximately 20 µM and did not increase significantly beyond this concentration up to 40 µM, indicating a 1:1 binding stoichiometry (Fig. 5c). The presence of this complex was apparent by the formation of a pale yellow coloration compared to the control buffer (data not shown). The calculated molecular affinity of His6-Cj1613c for heme gave a KD value of 8.3 µM ± 1.7, which is similar to, though slightly weaker than, affinities reported for other bacterial HOs (46, 53, 63).
![]() View larger version (44K): [in a new window] |
FIG.5. Purification of recombinant His6-Cj1613c and absorbance spectroscopy of hemin binding and the degradation of heme:His6-Cj1613c complex. (a) SDS-PAGE of His6-Cj1613c purification. Lanes: 1, molecular weight markers; 2, column flowthrough; 3, 5 mM imidazole wash; 4, 60 mM imidazole wash; 5 to 10, elution fractions. Arrow indicates the band identified by Western analysis and sequencing as recombinant His6-Cj1613c. (b) Hemin was added incrementally (0 to 40 µM) to 20 µM His6-Cj1613c protein. Absorbance changes are indicated by the position and direction of the arrows. (Inset) The region between 500 and 650 nm has been enlarged to show the peaks at 540 and 573 nm. (c) Heme:His6-Cj1613c binding stoichiometry and affinity. Values were plotted as (i) the change in absorbance at 411 nm against heme concentration and (ii) log(unbound) against log(bound/unbound) hemin. (d) Degradation of the heme:His6-Cj1613c complex in the presence of ascorbic acid. Spectra show changes in absorbance at 2 min intervals up to 20 min (no significant change was observed after 1 h). (Inset) The region between 500 and 700 nm has been enlarged. Arrows indicate the positions and directions of absorbance changes. Black arrows indicate spectral changes indicating conversion of heme:His6-Cj1613c to the ferric biliverdin:His6-Cj1613c complex. Gray arrows correspond to spectral shifts indicative of iron-free biliverdin formation.
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5 Continued.
|
The by-products of hemin degradation are not involved in protection from peroxide stress. In eukaryotes, a reductase is involved in the conversion of ferric biliverdin to yield bilirubin, and furthermore, this by-product has been implicated in protection against oxidative stress (31). This role may be particularly relevant given the increase in intracellular iron accompanying hemin degradation, resulting in an increase in the Haber-Weiss-Fenton-type iron-catalyzed formation of superoxide and hydroxyl radical from H2O2. Mutation of Cj1613c or chuA may therefore starve the cells of biliverdin and thus prevent generation of the protective metabolite bilirubin. To test whether disruption of Cj1613c or chuA renders C. jejuni more sensitive to the effects of peroxide stress a simple plate assay was conducted. Mutants and wild-type strains were used to inoculate agar under iron-replete or iron-restricted conditions or with hemin as the sole iron source, and the zone of growth inhibition surrounding the filter disk impregnated with H2O2 was measured. No apparent difference was observed (data not shown), indicating that these mutants are no more sensitive to the effects of peroxide than the wild type.
|
|
|---|
A phylogenetic analysis of the ChuA amino acid sequence with experimentally characterized orthologous proteins from other bacterial species (Fig. 6) reveals that these types of receptors display a pseudocladistic phylogeny. ChuA shows closest relatedness to the heme/hemoglobin- and hemoglobin-specific branches, indicating that ChuA may belong to a clade that contains hemoglobin-specific receptors, and as such the preferential utilization of hemoglobin over heme observed in these studies may reflect an evolutionary trend towards increasing substrate specificity. As the experimentally defined data pool of receptor substrate specificities becomes larger, a more comprehensive phylogenetic analysis, which may reveal a more distinct hemoglobin-specific clade, should be possible. Interestingly, the S. marcescens hemophore receptor HasR shows close relatedness to both heme-specific and lower-specificity hemoprotein receptors, though due to the absence of other hemophore receptors having been described it is not presently possible to determine a distinct lineage.
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Phylogenetic comparison of ChuA from C. jejuni NCTC 11168 with heme, hemoprotein, and hemophore receptors characterized in other bacterial species. Receptor substrate specificities are coded as hemoglobin only (1), heme and hemoglobin (2), heme only (3), heme and multiple hemoproteins (4), hemophore (5), and hemoglobin/hemoglobin:haptoblobin (6). The dashed arrow indicates a direction of evolutionary conservation towards hemoglobin substrate specificity. The dotted arrow indicates a direction of evolution away from receptor substrate specificity. Abbreviations: HmbR, N. meningitidis HmbR (51); HgbA (Ap), Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae HgbA (47); HgbA (Hd), Haemophilus ducreyi HgbA (11, 12); HmuR (Pg), Porphyromonas gingivalis HmuR (38, 45); HasR (Pa), Pseudomonas aeruginosa HasR (37); PhuR, P. aeruginosa PhuR (37); HutA, V. cholerae HutA (20, 32); ChuA, C. jejuni ChuA (this study); TdhA, H. ducreyi TdhA (55); HemR, Y. enterocolitica HemR (49); HugA, P. shigelloides HugA (21); HmuR (Yp), Yersinia pestis HmuR (57); HxuC, H. influenzae HxuC (7, 9); HasR (Sm), S. marsescens HasR (16), HgpA, -B, and -C, H. influenzae HgpA, -B, and -C (34); HupA, H. influenzae HupA (33).
|
Analysis of the heme utilization gene cluster in C. jejuni clinical isolates revealed that all strains possess Cj1613c, which on the basis of PCR mapping appears to be highly conserved. By contrast, there appears to be a lower degree of conservation within chuA, though the biological implications of this are unclear at present. The heme-negative phenotype of strain 53486 indicates that chuA, while present, may be nonfunctional, and it seems that this loss of chuA function is not complemented by the presence of an alternative receptor in this strain. Likewise, substrate transport across the inner membrane may not be a role exclusively fulfilled by chuBCD, as indicated by the absence of chuC in the heme/hemoglobin utilization-positive strain 35503. A similar mapping study of the heme utilization gene cluster of Vibrio anguillarum revealed that in most strains lacking the cluster-linked huvA locus, an alternative outer membrane heme receptor gene, which was designated huvS and could complement huvA in E. coli and V. anguillarum, was present (36). We have attempted to identify additional outer membrane heme- or hemoglobin-binding proteins that may serve as alternative receptors to ChuA using a batch affinity chromatography method (54); however, no candidates have yet been identified (data not shown).
A cross-species comparison of the heme biosynthesis pathway of E. coli with C. jejuni NCTC 11168 indicates that the latter possesses all the components required for the de novo synthesis of heme (http://biocyc.org). The close genetic linkage between specific heme transport and heme oxygenase loci and the absence of linkage to other genes associated with the heme metabolic pathway (i.e., coproporhyrinogen oxidase; Cj0992c, hemN) support iron nutrition as the major purpose of heme acquisition in C. jejuni. It may therefore be inferred that acquisition of heme may have evolved in C. jejuni solely to meet the iron requirements of the cell rather than as a source of metabolic heme.
Regulation and organization of the C. jejuni heme utilization gene cluster. The presence of two putative Fur boxes within the heme utilization gene cluster led us to investigate the possibility that Cj1613c and chuABCD are expressed independently of each other but that their expression is dependent on Fur and iron. The results of the reporter gene studies described here have confirmed this hypothesis. Coordinated expression via a common regulator may ensure that once heme has entered the cytoplasm it can be promptly degraded not only to meet the cells' iron requirements, but also to reduce its potential toxicity through degradation to biliverdin. To date, no other candidate regulators of iron uptake have been identified in C. jejuni.
In attempts to identify additional genes involved in heme utilization it would be prudent to consider attributes characteristic of Cj1613c-chuD, such as classical iron-repressible, Fur-dependent regulation and the possession of a putative Fur box. The potential existence of such genes is indicated by the apparent semiredundancy of chuBCD described here and also by comparison of the Cj1613c-17 gene cluster with known heme utilization gene clusters from other bacterial species (21, 35, 36). Most notable is the absence of a linked TonB-ExbB-ExbD system, which is expected to be required for energizing the outer membrane receptor(s). Although three putative systems are present in the genome of C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (Cj0179-81, Cj1628-30, and Cj0753c), none have yet been specifically associated with heme transport. Further investigation using a panel of single, double, and triple ton mutants would resolve this issue. Other key differences include an unlinked putative coproporphyrinogen oxidase (hemN) and absence of a putative transcriptional activator (66). A relatively small complement of genes required for heme utilization may reflect the apparent genetic minimalism observed in Campylobacter species. However, several putative iron transport systems exist in C. jejuni, and it is reasonable to suggest that this organism utilizes various sources of iron during transmission, colonization, or infection of different host animal intestines.
Cj1613c is a heme oxygenase. Foundation studies on the biochemical nature of the human HOs have formed the basis for many of the current studies of bacterial HO orthologues (26, 68). The recent identification of heme oxygenase genes within heme utilization gene clusters in several important gram-negative pathogens bearing sequence homology with Cj1613c prompted the biophysical studies presented here. The purified recombinant protein binds hemin in vitro at a hemin-to-protein ratio approaching 1:1 with moderate affinity (KD value in the low micromolar range) and displaying absorbance maxima at 411, 540, and 573 nm that are similar to those reported for other HOs in other species (53, 67, 71). The HO activity of His6-Cj1613c was confirmed by the appearance of characteristic spectral changes following addition of ascorbic acid as the electron donor. Importantly, the formation of broad absorbance maxima at 395 and 660 nm suggests that the end product of heme degradation is the iron-free form of biliverdin, similar to that observed with ChuS from E. coli O157:H7 (53), rather than ferric biliverdin, which was suggested to be the end product of heme degradation by Neisseria spp. HemO (70).
Conversion of ferric biliverdin to bilirubin in eukaryotes requires a reductase (31), and it is possible that a similar pathway may exist in prokaryotes even though no gene candidate has yet been proposed for C. jejuni. Comparison of the chuA and Cj1613c mutants to the wild-type strain in a peroxide sensitivity assay found no differences, suggesting that bilirubin, if produced as a by-product of hemin metabolism, may not play an important role in protection against oxidative stress in C. jejuni. Alternatively, C. jejuni possesses several enzymes involved in oxidative stress protection, namely catalase (katA) (17), alkyl-hydroperoxide reductase (ahpC) (3), and ferredoxin (fdxA) (61). Additionally, C. jejuni possesses a PerR homologue that regulates katA and ahpC. In other organisms, PerR, a Fur structural homologue, functions in coordinating peroxide stress defense and iron uptake genes using iron as a cofactor in response to intracellular peroxide, and as such a similar mechanism exists in C. jejuni.
The coordinated expression of HO with heme uptake through iron and Fur and the subsequent HO-mediated degradation of heme to biliverdin likely serve to allow access to a valuable iron source in vivo while limiting the toxic effects of intracellular uncomplexed heme. By comparison of the heme utilization gene cluster of C. jejuni with similar known gene clusters from other bacterial species, the confirmed and putative functional homologues of Cj1613c commonly bear the suffix -Z. On this basis we propose the redesignation of this gene as chuZ.
In conclusion, we have experimentally characterized the heme utilization gene cluster in C. jejuni. We have identified ChuA as the major outer membrane transport protein for heme/hemoproteins and Cj1613c (ChuZ) as a highly conserved oxygenase required for heme degradation. ChuBCD are most likely involved in the transport of heme across the inner membrane, although they do not appear essential for this process. The gene cluster is highly conserved among clinical isolates of C. jejuni, though additional heme transport genes may be present in some strains and capable of substituting for chuBCD. Promoter analysis confirms classical Fur-dependent, iron-repressible regulation of the gene cluster, though Cj1613c expression is independent of chuABCD expression.
We acknowledge Andrew Westlake, Department of Biochemistry, University of Leicester, United Kingdom, for assistance with spectrophotometric analyses and Jenny Frost and Andrew Lawson, Laboratory of Enteric Pathogens, Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections, London, United Kingdom, for C. jejuni strains.
Published ahead of print on 15 September 2006. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»