Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, December 2006, p. 8095-8102, Vol. 188, No. 23
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00908-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Oral Biology, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York
Received 23 June 2006/ Accepted 12 September 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Biofilm formation is initiated by interaction between planktonic bacteria and a surface in response to appropriate environmental signals (2, 5, 11, 12, 16-18). In addition to responses to physical and chemical signals, bacteria regulate diverse physiological processes in a cell density-dependent manner; this is commonly called quorum sensing (1, 10). Bacteria utilize quorum-sensing systems to modulate environmental stress responses. Recently, some studies demonstrated that biofilm formation, acid tolerance, and the transformation of S. mutans are mediated by quorum sensing (3). The quorum-sensing system in S. mutans consists of at least five gene products, including a 21-amino-acid competence-stimulating peptide (CSP) whose precursor is encoded by comC, a histidine kinase sensor protein encoded by comD, and the cognate response regulator expressed from the comE gene (13). The comCDE genes are located in the same locus and together constitute a quorum-sensing system for generating and responding to CSP (13). By interfering with this cell-cell signaling mechanism, caries-causing S. mutans bacteria which use quorum sensing to control virulence could potentially be attenuated.
Many gram-positive bacteria produce antimicrobial peptides called bacteriocins (4, 8, 20, 24). Although these peptide molecules are not required for growth, they may help the microorganisms that produce them to compete for the limited nutrients in their environment (22). It has been shown that production of some of these antimicrobial peptides is regulated by the comC quorum-sensing system in S. mutans (9, 21). Bacteria in biofilms frequently express much greater resistance to antimicrobial agents than they do in the corresponding planktonic cultures (5). Since biofilm formation in some organisms is modulated by quorum sensing, we investigated the possibility that the comC quorum-sensing system in S. mutans modulates its sensitivity to antimicrobial compounds. Although some of the CSP-induced genes might be important for efficient genetic exchange under natural conditions, many of these gene products likely aid in other cell density-adaptive functions; i.e., several CSP-induced genes have stress-related roles or participate in the synthesis and transport of bacteriocin-like peptides (21, 24). The present results suggest for the first time that the antimicrobial sensitivity of S. mutans GS5 is modulated by some of the putative bacteriocin immunity proteins expressed by the organism. Since the bacteriocin operons are regulated, in turn, by quorum sensing, this suggests how quorum sensing can regulate the antimicrobial sensitivity of an organism.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids
|
Construction of the bip and smbG mutants. The bip and smbG mutants (Fig. 1) were constructed following double-crossover homologous recombination via insertion of an erythromycin resistance determinant into each gene. The plasmids used for disruption of the bip and smbG genes were prepared as follows. A 1.6-kb DNA fragment containing the entire bip or smbG gene together with the respective flanking regions were PCR amplified from GS5 genomic DNA with the following primers: for bip, forward primer 1736A (5'-TGCGGTCTATTGACCTCCTC-3') and reverse primer ComCsmmC (5'-CGGGGTACCTTGATTATTTAACCC-3'); for smbG, forward primer SMBT2/PCRFO (5'-CGTATGGAGCTGTGGGAATAC-3') and reverse primer SMBT2/PCRRE (5'-GGTTACTGTGAGCCAATCCAC-3'). Initially, the DNA fragments including the bip and smbG genes were cloned into the pCR2.1-TOPO vector (Invitrogen), and the resulting plasmids were digested with EcoRI. The fragments were then cloned into pUC19 to generate resulting plasmids pMM501 and pMM502, respectively. Both plasmids were digested with SpeI and BamHI at their respective unique sites, which were located within the target genes, followed by blunt ending and ligation with an erm resistance cassette from pUC119Em (19). The resulting plasmids, pMM503 and pMM504, were linearized with KpnI and HindIII, respectively, downstream from the inserted fragments, and the linearized plasmids were used to transform S. mutans GS5 (19). Confirmation of plasmid insertions causing gene disruption was performed by PCR (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Relative orientations of the bip and smbG genes in S. mutans GS5. (A) The bip gene is located upstream of the comCDE locus. (B) The smbG gene is located upstream of the bacteriocin structural genes, smbA and smbB, within the smb operon. Open boxes, putative promoter regions of the operons. The transcription of the genes is depicted by the orientation of the boxed arrows.
|
Growth inhibition by antibiotics. Each S. mutans strain grown overnight at 37°C was inoculated into THB containing several concentrations of each antimicrobial in duplicate. After the strains were grown overnight at 37°C, the cell density was measured by determining the optical density at 600 nm.
Agar plate bacteriocin assays. Loopfuls of stationary-phase cultures of the S. mutans strains were stabbed into a THB agar plate. After 24 h of incubation at 37°C under anaerobic conditions, the plates were overlaid with the bip H1 double mutant in 3 ml of THB with 1% low-melting-point agarose (Bioproducts, Rockland, Maine). After 24 h of additional incubation at 37°C under anaerobic conditions, the diameters of the clearance zones surrounding the inoculated bacteria were measured.
Biofilm formation. S. mutans GS5 was inoculated into 5-ml portions of half-strength THB in six-well polystyrene microtiter plates to form biofilms. After 48 h of incubation, the planktonic cells and biofilm cells were separated for quantitation as previously described (25). Briefly, biofilm formation was quantitated following crystal violet staining of biofilms, while growth was determined by measuring the turbidities (optical density at 570 nm) of parallel wells following resuspension of the sessile organisms with planktonic cells.
Real-time quantitative RT-PCR.
Total RNA was isolated from 15 ml of log-phase cell cultures. After centrifugation, the cells were suspended in 0.3 ml of diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water. The samples were transferred to FastRNA tubes with blue caps (Qbiogene, Inc., Carlsbad, Calif.), and 0.9 ml of TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) was then added. Cells were broken with a FastPREP FP120 homogenizer (Qbiogene) at a speed setting of 0.6 for 30 s. After samples were placed on ice for 2 min, 0.2 ml of chloroform was added and the tubes were vortexed and centrifuged again as described above. The RNA was finally precipitated from the aqueous phase with isopropanol, and the resulting pellets were dried and resuspended in 20 µl of diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water. For reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis, RNA samples were treated for 15 min at 37°C with 1.0 U of RNase-free DNase (Amersham Biosciences Corp., Piscataway, N.J.) per ml to remove contaminating DNA. Reverse transcription was carried out with SuperScript III (Invitrogen) according to the directions of the supplier. The real-time RT-PCR was performed on cDNA samples with either the 16S rRNA primers (as internal controls) or bip-specific primers (1737/F, 5'-CAGCGCAGCTGATAGCTGTTTGTCT-3'; 1737/R, 5'-CTGCTGGCAAATTCGCTTACTTG-3'), using IQ-Supermix PCR reagent (Bio-Rad) in the iCycler thermal cycler according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Relative expression levels of bip transcripts were then calculated by normalizing the levels of bip-specific RNA to the levels of 16S rRNA. By normalizing the cycle threshold (CT) values for bip to the total amount of 16S rRNA, all samples were compared, and the relative fold changes in the samples were calculated using the 
CT method described for the MyIQ real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories). A similar approach was used to quantitate smbG mRNA
Fluorescence efflux measurement. The tested strains were grown to mid-log phase, and then cells were then harvested at 7,000 x g for 10 min, washed once with 100 mM NaCl-50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), and suspended again in the same buffer at an optical density at 600 nm of 0.1 in the presence of glycerol. Experimental measurements were generally performed within 2 h after cell preparation. Fluorescence measurements were performed by a modification of methods described previously (15). The fluorescent probe, N-phenyl-1-naphtylamine (NPN; Sigma), was initially dissolved in absolute methanol. Fluorescence emission intensity was measured with a Twinkle LB970 fluorometer (Berthold Technologies GmbH & Co. KG, Bad Wildbad, Germany). Excitation and emission wavelengths for NPN were 355 nm and 460 nm, respectively.
Statistical analysis. Intergroup differences between various factors were estimated using a statistical analysis of variance for factorical models. Fisher's protected least-significant differences (PLSD) test was used to compare individual groups.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Antimicrobial sensitivities of GS5 and the comC mutant. Penicillin (A) and fluoride (B) at the indicated concentrations were added to cultures grown as described in the text. There are statistically significant differences between the growth of GS5 and that of the comC mutant (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.001 [Fisher's PLSD]). Error bars indicate standard deviations.
|
![]() View larger version (6K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Histatin sensitivities of GS5 and the comC mutant. The GS5 and comC mutant strains were grown overnight, and cells were washed twice with sodium phosphate buffer. Cells were resuspended at 2.5 x 105 CFU/ml and incubated with the indicated concentration of histatin. There are statistically significant differences between the growth of GS5 and that of the comC mutant (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 [Fisher's PLSD]). Error bars indicate standard deviations.
|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Tetracycline sensitivities of the bip and comC mutants. The mutants were incubated in THB containing tetracycline and grown as described in the text. (A) GS5 and GS5 comC mutant. (B) UA159 and UA159 comC mutant. (C) GS5, GS5 comC mutant, and GS5 bip mutant. There are statistically significant differences between the growth of the wild-type strains and that of the mutants (*, P < 0.05 [Fisher's PLSD]). Each experiment was repeated three times with triplicate samples. Error bars indicate standard deviations.
|
Therefore, these results suggested that the increased sensitivity of strain GS5 to a wide variety of antimicrobial agents was primarily due to the inactivation of the bip gene, which codes for a putative immunity protein.
The SmbG immunity protein also affects antimicrobial sensitivity in S. mutans GS5. Since an operon coding for the bacteriocin Smb in strain GS5 has recently been described (24) and was shown to contain a putative immunity protein gene, smbG, it was of interest to determine if this gene also influences the sensitivity of strain GS5 to antimicrobial agents. Therefore, an smbG mutant was constructed and its antimicrobial sensitivities determined. Like the bip mutation, the smbG mutation also resulted in increased sensitivity to a variety of antimicrobial agents, including tetracycline and triclosan, relative to wild-type GS5 (Fig. 5). This suggested that the alteration in antimicrobial sensitivity resulting from the bip mutation was not limited to this putative immunity protein gene alone.
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Antimicrobial sensitivities of GS5 and the smbG mutant. Tetracycline (a) and triclosan (b) at the indicated concentrations were added to cultures grown as described in the text. There are statistically significant differences between the growth of GS5 and that of the smbG mutant (*, P < 0.001 [Fisher's PLSD]). Each experiment was repeated three times with triplicate samples. Error bars indicate standard deviations.
|
![]() View larger version (137K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Sensitivity of the bip H1 double mutant to the Smb bacteriocin. Wild-type strain GS5 (A) and the smbA mutant (defective in Smb production) (B) were spotted onto a THB agar plate from overnight cultures. After incubation for 1 day, the plate was overlaid with the indicator strain, the bip H1 double mutant, and incubated for an additional 24 h.
|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Expression of the bip (A) and smbG (B) genes in biofilms and planktonic cells. The quantity of bip gene cDNA measured by real-time RT-PCR was normalized to the 16S rRNA cDNA abundance within each unique reaction. Each experiment was repeated three times with triplicate samples. Error bars indicate the variance between triplicate samples within the real-time RT-PCR. There are statistically significant differences between biofilm cells and planktonic cells (*, P < 0.05 [Fisher's PLSD]).
|
![]() View larger version (4K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Effects of smb mutation on bip gene transcription. The RNA was extracted and quantified by real-time RT-PCR for bip gene expression. The quantity of bip cDNA measured by real-time RT-PCR was normalized to the 16S cDNA abundance within each unique reaction.
|
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Immunity protein gene expression in the presence of tetracycline. Shaded bars, smbG gene; solid bars, bip gene. There are statistically significant differences between strain GS5 in the presence and absence of different concentrations of tetracycline (*, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.001 [Fisher's PLSD]). Each experiment was repeated three times with triplicate samples. Error bars indicate standard deviations.
|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. Roles of Bip and SmbG in export as determined using a model export molecule, fluorescent NPN. Fluorescence of the cells was determined in the presence of different concentrations of NPN as described in the text. , GS5; , bip mutant; , smbG mutant. There are statistically significant differences between GS5 and the two mutants (*, P < 0.05 [Fisher's PLSD]). Each experiment was repeated three times with triplicate samples. Error bars indicate standard deviations.
|
|
|
|---|
The present results further suggest that other bacteriocin immunity proteins in addition to Bip in strain GS5 could also affect antimicrobial sensitivity. For example, the smbG gene, coding for another putative immunity protein, also appears to play a role in this sensitivity. Recent results have also suggested that CSP is also involved in the regulation of expression of the smb operon (24). However, the inability to complement the comC mutation and alter antimicrobial sensitivity with exogenous CSP under conditions where bacteriocin production is complemented (24) suggests that smbG is not primarily responsible for the increased comC mutant antimicrobial sensitivities. Nevertheless, the smbG mutation also increased the sensitivity of strain GS5 to antimicrobial agents, indicating that this gene product does have an effect on this property. Thus, it is suggested that the multiple bacteriocin-like immunity proteins expressed by organisms such as S. mutans could play roles in the resistance of these organisms to a variety of antimicrobial agents.
It has been widely reported that bacteria growing as a surface biofilm are more resistant to various stress challenges and antimicrobial agents than planktonic cells (2, 7, 14). Of medical importance is the observation that biofilm cells can be 1,000-fold more resistant to antibiotics than planktonic cells. The present results suggesting increased expression of the putative immunity protein genes during in vitro biofilm formation are compatible with a general role for the bacteriocin immunity proteins in such resistance. However, the magnitude of the induction demonstrated suggests that this may not be the major factor associated with biofilm resistance.
The present study also demonstrated that the expression of the bip and smbG genes was markedly increased in the presence of tetracycline. The induced expression of the bip gene in the presence of low concentrations of the antibiotic was more pronounced, approximately 1,000-fold higher than that of the smbG gene. Such a large increase might reflect the weak expression of the bip gene in the absence of exogenous antimicrobial agents. In addition, the present results suggesting a redundant role for SmbG and Bip relative to Smb sensitivity further suggest that these proteins are not absolutely specific for resistance to their cognate bacteriocins. However, the putative bacteriocin associated with Bip has not yet been characterized.
The present results are also consistent with a role for both the Bip and SmbG proteins in the export of antimicrobial agents, as suggested for many bacteriocin immunity proteins (12). Both the bip and smbG mutants were attenuated in exporting NPN relative to the wild-type strain. An interesting question raised by these results involves the molecular basis for the broad specificity displayed by the S. mutans putative immunity proteins. Although it would appear that these proteins evolved to ensure the relative resistance of the producer strain to their respective bacteriocins, it appears that these proteins have much broader specificity. Further investigation into the structures and mechanisms of action of these proteins will be required to determine the molecular basis for these properties.
Several general implications of the present results are suggested both for the evolution of immunity proteins and for antimicrobial therapy. It is reasonable to propose that bacteriocin-producing bacteria may have evolved as a result of the environmental advantage of producing bacteriocins. These antimicrobial products generally affect organisms closely related to the producers. The present results suggest that the selection for bacteriocin immunity proteins may also have been an important factor in the evolution and transmission of these operons. The broad specificity of these proteins as demonstrated in the present study may provide protection against a variety of inhibitory substances (i.e., metals, antibiotics, bacteriocins, etc.) in different environments. The demonstration of the presence of genes such as those in the bip-containing operon of S. mutans without demonstrated antimicrobial activity is also compatible with such a hypothesis. Thus, the activity of the immunity proteins, rather than their cognate bacteriocins, may have become important for the survival of some bacteria in specific environments.
The present results further suggest a novel approach for chemotherapy against certain bacteria. It may be possible to increase the effectiveness of commonly used antimicrobial agents by specifically inhibiting the bacteriocin immunity protein activities of these organisms. For example, the effectiveness of the commonly utilized antiplaque agent triclosan against cariogenic S. mutans could be enhanced by developing specific inhibitors of Bip activity. Moreover, since CSP is involved in regulating the expression of multiple bacteriocin operons in these organisms, specific inhibitors of CSP activity may also produce comparable effects. Such approaches would also have the advantage of targeting specific pathogenic organisms without comparable effects on endogenous bacteria. Further investigation will be required to determine if such approaches can prove to be useful in chemotherapy against specific diseases.
Published ahead of print on 22 September 2006. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»