Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, April 2006, p. 3143-3148, Vol. 188, No. 8
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.188.8.3143-3148.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology and Centre for Science at Extreme Conditions, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JR, United Kingdom,1 Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 021392
Received 25 October 2005/ Accepted 27 January 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
50% of the lipid A molecules of S. meliloti and B. abortus become modified with a VLCFA, in contrast to their respective parent strains, whose lipid A molecules all contain a VLCFA modification (5). However, recent evidence suggests that the unusual lipid A modification observed during growth of wild-type S. meliloti in complex medium is important, but not essential, for the legume symbiosis (6). Thus, since additional VLCFA modifications of the lipid A occur during the symbiosis of Rhizobium leguminosarum with peas (11), and we observed a similar increase in S. meliloti lipopolysaccharide (LPS) hydrophobicity during the alfalfa symbiosis (6), we proposed a model whereby BacA could be involved in host-induced lipid A changes. These BacA-dependent lipid A changes could be essential for the chronic infection of their eukaryotic hosts by S. meliloti and B. abortus (6). Nevertheless, there also remained a formal possibility that additional lipid A-independent changes were occurring in the S. meliloti bacA-null mutant and that one or more of these changes could also be involved in the inability of bacA mutants to persist within their hosts. For example, it seemed unlikely that a reduction in the lipid A VLCFA content could account for the low-level bleomycin resistance phenotype of the S. meliloti bacA-null mutant, since deletion of the bacA homolog, sbmA, in Escherichia coli also gives rise to a similar phenotype (10), despite the fact that the lipid A of E. coli lacks VLCFA modifications (15). Thus, these data suggested that BacA might have additional effects on S. meliloti, resulting in increased sensitization of wild-type S. meliloti toward bleomycin relative to the S. meliloti bacA mutant.
S. meliloti mutants completely lacking the lipid A VLCFA modification have increased sensitivity to bleomycin. Our recent discovery that the lipid A species produced by the S. meliloti acpXL and lpxXL insertional mutants in LB medium supplemented with 2.5 mM MgSO4 and 2.5 mM CaCl2 (LB/MC medium) completely lacked the lipid A VLCFA modifications (6) provided us with the means to investigate how the absence of the lipid A VLCFA modification in S. meliloti influences bleomycin sensitivity. The acpXL and lpxXL gene products encode a VLCFA-acyl carrier protein (3) and a VLCFA-acyltransferase protein (1), which are directly involved in the biosynthesis of VFCFA-modified lipid A in S. meliloti. However, in contrast to S. meliloti bacA mutants, which display low-level resistance to bleomycin, the S. meliloti acpXL and lpxXL insertional mutants displayed increased sensitivity to bleomycin on LB/MC agar relative to the parent strain, Rm1021 (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, consistent with previous stress sensitivity assays (6), the lpxXL mutant was more sensitized to bleomycin than the acpXL mutant. Since the acpXL mutant, but not the lpxXL mutant, produces a significant percentage of its total lipid A molecules in the pentaacylated state (6), despite lacking the VLCFA modification, these pentaacylated lipid A molecules must confer some protection against bleomycin. However, these data show that the complete absence of the lipid A VLCFA modification increases the sensitivity of S. meliloti to bleomycin and does not lead to increased bleomycin resistance. Thus, these findings provide further support for the notion that the low-level bleomycin resistance phenotype of the S. meliloti bacA mutant is unlikely to be due to a reduction in the lipid A VLCFA modification content.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Deletion of bacA confers resistance to bleomycin in strains lacking the lipid A VLCFA modification. (A) The sequenced S. meliloti strain Rm1021 (black bar) (8) and a series of isogenic mutants ( bacAsp [dark gray bar], acpXL::pK18mobGII [white bar], lpxXL::pJH104 [light gray bar]) (6, 10) were exposed to 5 µl of bleomycin (5-mg ml1 aqueous stock solution) following a standard disk diffusion assay on LB/MC agar (14). The diameter of the growth inhibition zone was recorded after 72 h of growth at 30°C. Experiments were conducted on LB/MC agar, since growth of the lpxXL single mutant and the lpxXL bacA double mutant was defective on LB agar alone (6). (B) Like panel A, but the sensitivities of isogenic acpXL::pK18mobGII (white bar) and bacAsp acpXL::pK18mobGII (white and black bar) mutants (6) to bleomycin were assessed. (C) Same as panel B except that isogenic lpxXL::pK18mobGII (light gray bar) and bacAsp lpxXL::pK18mobGII (gray and black bar) mutants (6) were used. Percentages represent the amount of the lipid A VLCFA modification detected in each strain (6).
|
In the related legume symbiont, R. leguminosarum, deletion of acpXL results in growth defects in complex medium relative to the parent strain (17). However, we observed that S. meliloti mutants with insertions in the lpxXL gene, but not the acpXL gene, had a reduced growth rate on LB/MC agar without bleomycin (data not shown). Since deletion of bacA did not further affect the growth rate of either the S. meliloti parent strain or the lpxXL and acpXL mutants on LB/MC agar without bleomycin (data not shown), these findings rule out the possibility that deletion of bacA confers protection of S. meliloti against bleomycin due to growth rate alterations.
Transposon insertions in the bacA gene alone lead to bleomycin resistance in S. meliloti.
To gain further insights into resistance to bleomycin in S. meliloti and to determine whether bleomycin resistance per se was linked to the inability of S. meliloti to form a successful legume symbiosis, a transposon mutant library was constructed in the S. meliloti Rm1021 parent strain background using Tn5-233 delivered on the suicide vector pRK607 (4). Tn5-233 was used instead of Tn5 because the latter transposon contains the ble gene, which encodes high-level resistance to bleomycin (4). The bleomycin sensitivity of the parental strain Rm1021 was initially determined by plating approximately 5 x 106 stationary-phase cells of Rm1021 onto LB agar supplemented with a range of bleomycin concentrations (0 to 2.5 µg ml1). We discovered that the growth of the parent strain was severely affected by the inclusion of
0.5 µg ml1 bleomycin in the agar. Thus,
8 x 105 S. meliloti Tn5-233 mutants were subsequently plated onto LB agar containing 0.5 to 2.5 µg ml1 bleomycin, and 9 putative bleomycin-resistant mutants were purified. All nine Tn5-233 mutants were shown to display a range of bleomycin resistance phenotypes compared to the parent strain, some having a level of resistance similar to that of a bacA-null mutant and some having higher levels of resistance (Fig. 2A). However, after transduction of the Tn5-233 insertions from the bleomycin-resistant mutants into Rm1021, all of the resulting transposon mutants conferred low-level resistance to bleomycin, similar to that observed for the bacA-null mutant (Fig. 2A). Thus, these findings suggested that some of the original transposon-induced bleomycin-resistant mutants contained additional unlinked mutations that contributed to their higher-level bleomycin resistance phenotype. Consistent with this hypothesis, we discovered that, like the bacA-null mutant, all nine of the transduced Tn5-233 mutants had increased sensitivity to deoxycholate (DOC) (Fig. 2B) and were defective in alfalfa symbiosis (data not shown). Subsequent analysis by PCR, using a Tn5-233-specific forward primer and a bacA-specific reverse primer, confirmed that that all nine of the transposon mutants contained insertions disrupting their bacA genes (data not shown). Since the S. meliloti genome is predicted to encode
6,000 genes (8) and since we plated
8 x 105 transposon mutants, our selection was performed under saturating conditions. Additionally, since the S. meliloti bacA gene is not arranged in an operon and since a plasmid carrying the S. meliloti bacA gene (9) complemented all the reported phenotypes of the bacA transposon insertion mutants (data not shown), this provided evidence that the phenotypes of the transposon mutants were due to disruption of the bacA gene and not to polar effects on downstream genes. Thus, under our experimental conditions, only disruption of the bacA gene resulted in bleomycin resistance in S. meliloti Rm1021. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that essential genes could also affect the resistance of S. meliloti to killing by bleomycin.
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. The bleomycin-resistant transposon mutants are also sensitive to deoxycholate. S. meliloti Rm1021 (black bars), a bacAsp mutant (dark gray bars), and a series of Tn5-233 insertional mutants (white bars) were exposed to either bleomycin on LB agar, using the disk diffusion assay (A), or a gradient of 0 to 24 mM deoxycholate on LB agar, as described previously (6) (B), and growth inhibition was recorded. As observed previously (6), Rm1021was not inhibited in the presence of deoxycholate. The bleomycin resistance (A) and deoxycholate sensitivity (B) assays were also conducted after transduction of the Tn5-233 insertions into Rm1021 (light gray bars).
|
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. A subset of the bleomycin-resistant mutants that are defective in alfalfa symbiosis are also deoxycholate sensitive. (A) Growth inhibition of S. meliloti Rm1021 (black bar) and the bleomycin-resistant mutants (white bars) was determined on LB agar using the standard bleomycin disk diffusion assay, as described previously (14). The numbers above the bars indicate the bleomycin concentration (µg ml1) used in the initial mutant selection. (B) Like panel A, except that mutants were arranged occurring to their level of bleomycin resistance. Black bar, Rm1021; white bars, mutants defective in alfalfa symbiosis; light gray bars, mutants proficient in alfalfa symbiosis. (C) Growth inhibition of Rm1021 (black bar) (no growth inhibition observed), an isogenic bacAsp mutant (dark gray bar), and the bleomycin-resistant mutants, which were defective in alfalfa symbiosis (white bars), after exposure to a gradient of 0 to 24 mM deoxycholate on LB agar, as described previously (6). The bleomycin-resistant mutants that were symbiotically competent were not inhibited by deoxycholate (data not shown).
|
Class I mutants all have mutations in their bacA genes. The fact that mutations in bacA are the only mutations known to date to give rise to low-level bleomycin resistance and symbiotic defects in S. meliloti led us to investigate whether our class I mutants contained mutations in their bacA genes. To investigate this further, the bacA genes and promoter regions from our class I mutants were sequenced, and we determined that all class I mutants had mutations in their bacA genes, which would result in the production of truncated BacA proteins (Table 1). Intriguingly, a number of the class I mutants had either an addition or a deletion at position 92 in their bacA gene (Table 1). Since the bacA gene sequence in this region contains a stretch of guanine residues, which are known to cause problems with DNA replication, leading to an increased frequency of frameshift mutations, this is likely to account for our observations. Additionally, we also observed that a number of the class I mutants had two mutations in their bacA gene (Table 1). Thus, it may be that frequently occurring mutations at hot spots in bacA lead to a growth disadvantage that results in selection for the acquisition of a second mutation in the bacA gene. However, these findings provide evidence that class I mutants produce mutant forms of the BacA protein. Consistent with this, all class I mutants displayed increased sensitivity to DOC on LB agar (Fig. 3C), and all of their phenotypes could be complemented by transformation with a plasmid harboring the intact S. meliloti bacA gene (pJG51A) but not with the control plasmid alone (pRK404) (9) (data not shown).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Class I bleomycin-resistant mutants all have mutations in their bacA genes
|
Conclusions. In this study, we show that the bleomycin resistance phenotype of the S. meliloti bacA mutant is independent of the lipid A alteration in this mutant. We also show that bleomycin resistance per se is not necessarily linked to the inability of S. meliloti to establish a successful symbiosis. Instead, this study provides evidence that the specific changes in bacA mutants resulting in the DOC sensitivity and bleomycin resistance phenotypes appear to be involved in the inability of bacA mutants to form an effective legume symbiosis. However, the mechanism by which loss of BacA gives rise to bleomycin resistance is still unresolved.
Interestingly, an E. coli mutant lacking the BacA homolog, SbmA, is also resistant to bleomycin and microcin antibiotics (10, 16). Since the E. coli sbmA mutant is as sensitive to internally synthesized microcins as the parent strain, this finding led to a model whereby SbmA is proposed to directly transport unusual peptides, such as bleomycin and microcin antibiotics, into the E. coli cell (16). Thus, it is possible that S. meliloti BacA may also be involved in bleomycin transport. However, there is no direct evidence demonstrating transport of bleomycin by E. coli SbmA, and it is difficult to rationalize why loss of a transport system would result only in low-level resistance to bleomycin. Additionally, the fact that bleomycin can still inhibit the growth of the S. meliloti bacA mutants suggests that there would have to be another mechanism for bleomycin uptake and/or that bleomycin can cause additional damage to an extracytoplasmic component of S. meliloti. However, when we selected for bleomycin-resistant mutants after transposon mutagenesis, we obtained only bacA mutants, suggesting either that an additional uptake system does not exist or that BacA is essential for the growth of S. meliloti on LB agar. Bleomycin has been shown to induce DNA damage in E. coli, and RecA was found to be involved in repair of this damage (18). We also found that an S. meliloti recA::Tn5-233 mutant has increased sensitivity to bleomycin compared to the parent strain (V. L. Marlow, C. Rougier, G. C. Walker, and G. P. Ferguson, unpublished data), suggesting that bleomycin can enter into S. meliloti cells and cause DNA damage. However, bleomycin has been shown to damage the cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (2), leading to increased spheroplast production, and thus, bleomycin may also be causing cell wall damage, in addition to DNA damage, in S. meliloti. Thus, future studies will be required to determine the precise effects of bleomycin on S. meliloti, the molecular basis of BacA-dependent bleomycin sensitivity, and the exact role of BacA in persistent bacteriuml-host interactions. However, these studies provide further evidence that BacA is also capable of exerting lipid A-independent effects in S. meliloti.
We thank Marty Roop II, Carole Rougier, and the Walker lab for many helpful discussions.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»