This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qin, N.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qin, N.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, A. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, June 2007, p. 4127-4134, Vol. 189, No. 11
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.01779-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Analysis of LuxR Regulon Gene Expression during Quorum Sensing in Vibrio fischeri{triangledown}

Nan Qin,1 Sean M. Callahan,2 Paul V. Dunlap,3 and Ann M. Stevens1*

Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061,1 Department of Microbiology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822,2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 481093

Received 22 November 2006/ Accepted 19 March 2007


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
The regulation of the lux operon (luxICDABEG) of Vibrio fischeri has been intensively studied as a model for quorum sensing in proteobacteria. Two-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis previously identified several non-Lux proteins in V. fischeri MJ-100 whose expression was dependent on LuxR and 3-oxo-hexanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (3-oxo-C6-HSL). To determine if the LuxR-dependent regulation of the genes encoding these proteins was due to direct transcriptional control by LuxR and 3-oxo-C6-HSL or instead was due to indirect control via an unidentified regulatory element, promoters of interest were cloned into a lacZ reporter and tested for their LuxR and 3-oxo-C6-HSL dependence in recombinant Escherichia coli. The promoters for qsrP, acfA, and ribB were found to be directly activated via LuxR-3-oxo-C6-HSL. The sites of transcription initiation were established via primer extension analysis. Based on this information and the position of the lux box-binding site near position –40, all three promoters appear to have a class II-type promoter structure. In order to more fully characterize the LuxR regulon in V. fischeri MJ-100, real-time reverse transcription-PCR was used to study the temporal expression of qsrP, acfA, and ribB during the exponential and stationary phases of growth, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays were used to compare the binding affinities of LuxR to the promoters under investigation. Taken together, the results demonstrate that regulation of the production of QsrP, RibB, and AcfA is controlled directly by LuxR at the level of transcription, thereby establishing that there is a LuxR regulon in V. fischeri MJ-100 whose genes are coordinately expressed during mid-exponential growth.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
The term quorum sensing describes the ability of a microorganism to recognize and respond to other microorganisms in a population by detecting the concentration of self-produced intercellular molecules commonly known as autoinducers. When an autoinducer reaches a critical threshold concentration, often at high cell densities, it triggers a signal transduction pathway leading to an alteration of gene expression patterns. There are a number of important bacterial processes regulated in this manner, including antibiotic production, release of exoenzymes, production of virulence factors, induction of genetic competency, conjugative plasmid transfer, biofilm formation, and bioluminescence (for reviews, see references 11, 24, 38, and 41).

In the gram-negative bioluminescent marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri a complex signal transduction system controls expression of bioluminescence (for a review, see reference 35). However, it is the products of luxI and luxR that directly activate lux operon transcription. LuxI, the autoinducer synthase, produces the diffusible autoinducer 3-oxo-hexanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (3-oxo-C6-HSL) (8). As the levels of 3-oxo-C6-HSL rise, complexes form between it and an autoinducer-dependent activator of transcription, LuxR. The complex can then activate transcription of the lux operon by binding to the lux box in the promoter region, leading to an increase in bioluminescence (33). The 252-amino-acid, two-domain LuxR polypeptide is one of the most-studied members of a family of over 50 transcriptional regulator proteins involved in acyl homoserine lactone-mediated quorum sensing (for reviews, see references 11, 21, and 40).

In LuxR, the N-terminal domain is believed to be membrane associated and to function as a receptor for the 3-oxo-C6-HSL ligand (15, 17). In response to binding the 3-oxo-C6-HSL, the N-terminal domain modulates the activity of the C-terminal domain (CTD). Binding of 3-oxo-C6-HSL permits multimerization of LuxR and subsequent activation of transcription of the lux operon, which is carried out by the CTD (3, 4). The CTD of LuxR has a helix-turn-helix motif and binds to a region of DNA termed the lux box, which is 20 bp long and has a dyad symmetry centered at a position –42.5 bp upstream of the transcription start site for the lux operon (5, 9). When LuxR functions as an activator of transcription at the luxI promoter, it is proposed to function as a homodimer in an ambidextrous manner similar to the manner observed for the cyclic AMP receptor protein at a class II-type promoter (1, 25) contacting both the alpha and sigma subunits of RNA polymerase (10, 16). Full-length LuxR protein was purified in the presence of 3-oxo-C6-HSL, which permitted its binding to the lux box to be demonstrated in vitro. Binding of 3-oxo-C6-HSL to LuxR appeared to be reversible in this system (34). In this study we examined the ability of LuxR to bind to the promoters of additional genes in V. fischeri MJ-100, leading to activation of transcription.

While the global quorum-sensing response in some organisms is substantial (e.g., Pseudomonas aeruginosa has over 400 quorum-sensing-controlled genes [29, 36]), little is known about the extent of the quorum-sensing response in V. fischeri (2, 19). Previously, two-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D SDS-PAGE) analysis of protein profiles produced from quorum-sensing mutants of V. fischeri MJ-100 defective in production of acyl-homoserine lactones and LuxR was performed (2). Strain MJ-100 (6, 7) is a spontaneous nalidixic acid-resistant variant of the MJ-1 strain (27) in which the regulation of the lux operon by LuxR has been extensively studied. Five quorum-sensing-regulated proteins other than Lux proteins were identified in this study. Four of the proteins were identified via amino acid sequencing, and two of them (AcfA and QsrV) appear to be encoded by an operon. Therefore, three putative LuxR-regulated promoters were identified. Based on sequence similarity, the genes adjacent to these promoters are qsrP, ribB, and acfA. Neither the qsrP nucleotide sequence nor the deduced amino acid sequence exhibited significant similarity with known genes or gene products. Therefore, QsrP is considered to be a novel periplasmic protein that plays a role in the ability of V. fischeri to colonize the sepiolid squid Eurpyrmna scolopes (2). In Escherichia coli, RibB is a 3,4-dihydroxy-2-butanone-4-phosphate synthase, which catalyzes a key step in riboflavin (vitamin B2) synthesis (26). AcfA has a Vibrio cholerae homologue which is believed to affect the ability of V. cholerae to colonize the mouse intestinal epithelium (22). While qsrP and acfA have been found in V. fischeri MJ-100 and ES114, the only strain of V. fischeri whose genome has been sequenced (28), ribB was not found in the ES114 strain, which demonstrates that there is strain-to-strain variation in quorum-sensing-controlled outputs in V. fischeri. The results of the 2D SDS-PAGE study, however, did not discriminate between direct and indirect regulation of these genes, leaving open the possibility of indirect quorum-sensing control that is mediated by an unidentified regulatory element. To test this possibility and to definitively establish the presence of a quorum-sensing regulon in V. fischeri, expression from the qsrP, ribB, and acfA promoters and from the qsrQ and qsrRST promoters that are divergently expressed from qsrP and acfA, respectively, was analyzed in recombinant E. coli. Two other promoters, upstream of ainS and arcA, were also included in these experiments based on the presence of putative lux boxes identified through sequence analysis (12; unpublished results).

After this initial screening, the promoters directly activated by LuxR-acyl homoserine lactone, the qsrP, ribB, and acfA promoters (Fig. 1), were more intensively studied. Primer extension analysis was performed to identify the transcription start sites so that the distances from them to the lux box could be established with certainty and the promoter structure could thereby be deduced. To determine if there is any hierarchy in the order of gene expression of the LuxR regulon, real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was used to examine the temporal expression of these three genes. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) were used to establish direct binding and to quantitate the relative binding affinities of LuxR to the promoters under investigation. These studies provided insights into the role that transcriptional regulation and posttranscriptional regulation play in the control of the V. fischeri MJ-100 LuxR regulon.


Figure 1
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 1. (A) Nucleotide sequences of the promoter regions of the V. fischeri MJ-100 qsrP, ribB, and acfA genes. The positions of putative lux boxes, –10 and –35 regions, and a ribosome-binding site (RBS) are indicated; +1 sites are indicated by bold type. A second nonfunctional promoter sequence upstream of ribB is indicated by (–10) and (–35). (B) Comparison of V. fischeri MJ-100 lux box sequences from different genes. The gray nucleotides differ from the nucleotides in the luxI box.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
Bacterial strains and growth media. The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are described in Table 1. Luria-Bertani broth (LB) was used to grow E. coli strains. It was supplemented, where indicated below, with ampicillin (Ap) (100 µg/ml), chloramphenicol (Cm) (20 µg/ml), 200 nM N-(ß-ketocaproyl)-L-homoserine lactone (3-oxo-C6-HSL) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), or 1 mM isopropyl-ß-D-1-thiogalatopyranoside (IPTG) (Sigma). Seawater complete (SWC) medium with instant ocean substituted for natural seawater (Aquarium Systems, Mentor OH) (20) or LBS medium (6) was used to grow V. fischeri MJ-100.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Strains and plasmids used in this study

Plasmid construction. The acfA and luxI genes were previously cloned into pSUP102 (2). V. fischeri chromosomal DNA was purified as a template (37), and qsrP and ribB were amplified using the primers indicated in Table 2 and cloned into pSUP102. The promoter regions of a number of genes containing putative lux boxes (luxI, qsrP, ribB, acfA, ainS, qsrQ, qsrRST, and arcA) were PCR amplified using the primers indicated in Table 2, cloned into pGEM-T (Promega, Madison, WI), and sequenced to confirm their integrity (Virginia Bioinformatics Institute Core Laboratory, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg). The promoter sequences were subsequently subcloned into the promoter-probe ß-galactosidase reporter pSP417 (23) using EcoRI/BamHI sites to construct pNQ101 to pNQ110 (Table 1). Two versions of the PqsrQ and PqsrRST promoters were cloned, one with the 5' end just upstream of the putative lux box and the other with additional upstream sequences containing the divergently transcribed promoters PqsrP and PacfA, respectively. For the RT-PCR analysis, internal fragments of qsrP and nadB were PCR amplified and cloned into pGEM-T, creating pNQqsrP and pNQnadB.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Primers used in this study

ß-Galactosidase assays. The pNQ101 to pNQ110 constructs were transformed individually into E. coli JM109 competent cells containing pAMS121 (32) containing a luxR gene that could be induced by IPTG. Overnight cultures were initially inoculated from freezer stocks into 5 ml LB medium with appropriate antibiotics and incubated at 30°C. A subculture of each strain was prepared by transferring the correct amount of the overnight culture into 5 ml LB medium plus Ap (100 µg/ml) and Cm (20 µg/ml) with either 200 nM 3-oxo-C6-DL-HSL or 1 mM IPTG, both 3-oxo-C6-DL-HSL and IPTG, or nothing to obtain an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.025. When the OD600 reached 0.5, 5 µl of cells was diluted 1:200 in Z buffer (60 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4) with 400 µM dithiothreitol and lysed with 50 µl of chloroform. Chemiluminescent ß-galactosidase assays (Tropix, Bedford, MA) were performed with 5 µl of cell lysate using an LD 400S luminescence detector (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) and a 20-s integration time. All assays were performed in three trials with triplicate samples in each trial, and the results were expressed in relative light units.

RNA purification. For primer extension, overnight cultures were initially inoculated from freezer stocks into 5 ml LB medium plus Ap (100 µg/ml) and Cm (20 µg/ml) (for E. coli) or SWC medium with no antibiotics (for V. fischeri) and incubated at 30°C. A subculture of each strain was prepared by transferring an appropriate amount of the overnight culture into 5 ml LB medium plus Ap (100 µg/ml) and Cm (20 µg/ml) with and without 200 nM 3-oxo-C6-HSL or SWC medium with and without 200 nM 3-oxo-C6-HSL to obtain an OD600 of 0.025. Then the cells were grown to an OD600 of 1.0. Five milliliters of cells was harvested and resuspended in TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 2 mM EDTA) and passed through 19- and 26-gauge needles (Becton Dickinson & Co, Franklin Lakes, NJ) four times each to improve lysis. Subsequent steps were performed using the QIAGEN RNeasy kit protocol (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). After purification, the RNA concentration was determined using a spectrophotometer. The sample was then dried in a Speedvac instrument and resuspended in RNase-free water.

For real-time RT-PCR, V. fischeri MJ-100 was grown in LBS medium to an OD600 of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0. In addition to the QIAGEN RNeasy kit, QIAGEN RNeasy Protect bacterial reagent and QIAGEN RNase-free DNase I were also used to stabilize the RNA and remove the residual DNA. The RNA was sent to the Virginia Bioinformatics Institute Core Laboratory (QIAGEN) to check the quantity and quality of the RNA before use in real-time RT-PCR protocols.

Primer extension. Each primer was 5' end labeled using [{gamma}-32P]dATP (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ) and a Primer Extension System kit (Promega, Madison, WI). Primer extension was performed using this kit according to the manufacturer's instructions, except that an ethanol precipitation step was used to remove unincorporated [{gamma}-32P]dATP from the primer. For ethanol precipitation 90 µl RNase-free water, 11 µl 3 M RNase-free sodium acetate, and 220 µl ethanol were added, mixed by vortexing, and kept at room temperature for 1 h. DNA sequences were obtained using a plasmid template purified with a QIAGEN Miniprep kit (QIAGEN) and were diluted to obtain a concentration of 100 ng/µl. Sequencing reactions were performed using an fmol DNA cycle sequencing system kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Real-time RT-PCR. An Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA) was used first to make sure that there was no DNA or other contaminants in the RNA samples and to determine the quantities of RNA that had been purified. cDNA was made from 1 µg of total RNA using random hexamer primers and an iScrip cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The resulting cDNA was diluted 1:10 and used as a template in RT-PCR with SYBR green detection using the Bio-Rad iCycler iQ real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad). The starting quantity of template for each sample was determined using a five-point standard curve generated by amplification of PCR products containing portions of the genes of interest from known quantities of plasmid templates. Melting curves were analyzed at the end of each PCR run, and controls included PCRs without total RNA and without the reverse transcriptase. RT-PCR was performed using the cDNA of each set of RNA in triplicate. The mean quantities of luxI, qsrP, ribB, and acfA transcripts were normalized based on the mean quantity of the control gene, nadB.

EMSA. The EMSA protocol used was based on the method of Urbanowski et al. (34). A DNA probe that served as both positive and negative controls was derived from a 400-bp PCR fragment containing the luxI-luxR regulatory region using template pSH202 (3). This PCR product was labeled at both ends using [{gamma}-32P]ATP plus T4 nucleotide kinase and was subsequently cleaved with MwoI, resulting in 160- and 240-bp fragments. Other DNA probes were generated via PCR and contained approximately 130 bp of the luxI, qsrP, acfA, or ribB promoter region or the lux box of luxD (Table 2). Protein-DNA binding reaction mixtures contained 1 fmol of each DNA probe in 20 µl (final volume) of DNA binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4 at 22°C], 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 100 µg of bovine serum albumin/ml, 5% glycerol). Purified LuxR and 6 µM 3-oxo-C6-L-HSL were added as indicated below, and the reaction mixtures were incubated at 26°C for 20 min. One microliter of loading dye (0.1% xylene cyanol in 50% glycerol) was added, the reaction mixtures were loaded onto a native 5% Tris-glycine-EDTA gel on ice, and electrophoresis was performed at 10 V/cm for 2 h at 4°C.


arrow
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 
LuxR dependence of V. fischeri promoters in recombinant E. coli. ß-Galactosidase assays were performed with recombinant E. coli/pAMS121 cells containing pNQ101 to pNQ110 individually (Table 1) in order to establish the presence of LuxR-dependent gene expression from the constructs. The reporter constructs contained the promoters for luxI, qsrP, ribB, acfA, ainS, qsrQ (two versions), qsrRST (two versions), and arcA from V. fischeri MJ-100 fused to lacZ. Cells were grown to the mid-exponential phase (OD600, 0.5), when the LuxR-dependent quorum-sensing response is normally upregulated. Growth media with four different combinations of IPTG and 3-oxo-C6-HSL levels were used to influence the expression and activity of the LuxR encoded on pAMS121. Four promoters controlling luxI, qsrP, ribB, and acfA expression were shown to be activated in a LuxR-dependent manner, but only in the presence of both LuxR and 3-oxo-C6-HSL (Fig. 2). The levels of ß-galactosidase expressed from these constructs were not equal; the luxI and qsrP constructs had the highest ß-galactosidase levels, the ribB construct had the lowest ß-galactosidase levels, and acfA expression was intermediate compared to the expression for the other genes in recombinant E. coli. This range suggests that there are differences in promoter strength and message stability between these four genes. The remaining promoters that were examined for LuxR-dependent expression did not drive ß-galactosidase expression at levels above the background level, as shown for PainS (Fig. 2 and data not shown). Therefore, we concluded that in recombinant E. coli, ainS, qsrQ, qsrRST, and arcA are not upregulated by LuxR under the conditions tested here. To test if these promoters were repressed by LuxR, additional ß-galactosidase assays were performed to compare expression (relative light units/OD600) at an OD600 of 0.25 and the expression at an OD600 of 0.75; no repression was observed (data not shown). Therefore, no direct induction or repression of ainS, qsrQ, qsrRST, and arcA by LuxR was found in these studies or in the previous 2D SDS-PAGE analysis (2). These findings may not exclude the possibility that there is quorum-dependent regulation under circumstances where the environment within the native host, V. fischeri, plays an additional regulatory role. The genes that were definitively determined to be in the LuxR regulon, qsrP, ribB, and acfA, were used for further analysis.


Figure 2
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 2. LuxR-dependent LacZ expression driven by V. fischeri promoters. The luxI, qsrP, ribB, acfA, and ainS promoters were fused to LacZ in pRS417, and ß-galactosidase levels in recombinant E. coli JM109 were determined. Three independent trials were conducted, with triplicate assays for each trial. The error bars indicate standard deviations from the means. The presence (+) and absence (–) of the autoinducer (AI) and IPTG are indicated at the bottom. RLU, relative light units.

Analysis of the sites of transcription initiation. To define the promoter structure of qsrP, ribB, and acfA, the transcriptional start sites were identified. TraR, which is a LuxR homolog in Agrobacterium tumefaciens, can activate transcription from either class I or class II promoters (39). In a class I promoter, the activator binding site is located at approximately position –60 and the activator interacts with the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase (13). In a class II promoter, the activator binding site is centered near position –40, overlapping the –35 recognition site for RNA polymerase and placing the activator in a position to potentially have multiple protein-protein interactions with the alpha and sigma subunits of RNA polymerase (1). In V. fischeri, the luxI promoter has a class II organization (10, 16). Based on the initial sequence analysis of the qsrP and acfA promoters, the lux box was predicted to overlap the –35 site (Fig. 1). Therefore, these two promoters were hypothesized to have a class II structure, similar to the luxI promoter. However, the ribB promoter contained two putative –10 sites, two putative –35 sites, and a lux box overlapping one of the –35 regions (Fig. 1A), indicating that it could potentially have either a class I-type structure or a class II-type structure.

Primer extension analysis was performed with RNA extracted from E. coli/pSC300, a strain expressing luxR under control of Ptac, and the vectors encoding qsrP, ribB, or acfA. RNA was also extracted from the V. fischeri luxI mutant strain MJ-211 (Table 1). Strains were grown either in the presence or in the absence of 3-oxo-C6-HSL to ascertain the dependence of the transcript on the quorum-sensing response. Since a higher copy number of the target transcript was present in E. coli, it was anticipated that more primer extension product would be generated than was generated in V. fischeri, and that is what was observed. The primer extension results for qsrP (Fig. 3) show both a major site and a minor site of transcription initiation under three of the four conditions tested; no transcripts were recovered from V. fischeri in the absence of 3-oxo-C6-HSL. The strongest transcripts were produced from either E. coli or V. fischeri strains in the presence of 3-oxo-C6-HSL. Based on these results, the position of the dominant transcriptional start site of qsrP was identified (Fig. 1A and 3), and the promoter was confirmed to have a class II-type structure.


Figure 3
View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 3. Primer extension analysis of the qsrP, acfA, and ribB promoters. Lanes G, A, T, and C, sequencing ladder from plasmid DNA; lane 1, RNA from E. coli JM109/pSC300 (luxR)/pSUP102 carrying the promoter of interest with 3-oxo-C6-HSL; lane 2, RNA from E. coli JM109/pSC300 (luxR)/pSUP102 carrying the promoter of interest without 3-oxo-C6-HSL; lane 3, RNA from V. fischeri MJ211 ({Delta}luxI) with 3-oxo-C6-HSL; lane 4, RNA from V. fischeri MJ211 ({Delta}luxI) without 3-oxo-C6-HSL; lane 5, no RNA (negative control). The results are representative of the results of assays done in duplicate.

For ribB and acfA, a series of bands were observed upon analysis of the primer extension products from E. coli. However, in V. fischeri, there was only one band for each gene, which corresponded to the dominant band from the E. coli samples. The strongest primer extension products were detected in samples from E. coli that had been exposed to 3-oxo-C6-HSL. Very weak ribB and acfA primer extension products were detected in V. fischeri cells that had been exposed to 3-oxo-C6-HSL. Therefore, for ribB and acfA, the amount of mRNA produced in V. fischeri appeared to be close to the threshold of detection for primer extension analysis. Nevertheless, the transcriptional start sites for ribB and acfA were identified (Fig. 1A and 3), and we concluded that both promoters have a class II-type architecture.

Timing of LuxR-dependent gene expression in V. fischeri. In order to ascertain the expression pattern of the LuxR regulon in its native host, V. fischeri, a real-time RT-PCR analysis was carried out with RNA samples extracted from cells grown from the early exponential phase to the stationary phase. In P. aeruginosa, the timing of quorum-sensing gene expression is on a continuum, which means that some genes are induced early in growth and others are induced at the transition from the exponential phase to the stationary phase or during the stationary phase (29). In this study, we used two RNA sets, both purified under the same conditions from V. fischeri cells grown to four different OD600 (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0). The luminescence outputs of these cells were checked when the cells were harvested for RNA purification. At these four OD600, the ratios of relative light units to OD were 27, 583, 643, and 829 (average data from the two trials). Thus, the quorum-sensing phenotype of bioluminescence was activated by mid-exponential-phase growth, as has been observed previously.

Using fragments of nadB and luxI as controls, the expression of the three putative LuxR-dependent genes was determined in two independent experiments using real-time RT-PCR. The nadB gene, which encodes L-aspartate oxidase in E. coli, was found to be expressed constitutively based on the work of other researchers (E. P. Greenberg, personal communication), and our initial analysis supported this finding. The starting quantity (SQ) of transcript was used to plot the RT-PCR data because it showed an elevated response due to quorum sensing, which is intuitively easier to understand. However, the threshold cycle, which is inversely proportional to the log SQ, also confirmed our findings. The SQ of luxI/nadB transcripts increased significantly at an OD600 of 0.5, and expression was maintained at OD600 of 1.0 and 2.0 (Fig. 4). This pattern of expression is what would be expected for a LuxR-dependent gene activated by the quorum-sensing response of the cells.


Figure 4
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 4. Results of real-time RT-PCR performed during the exponential and stationary phases of growth with V. fischeri MJ-100. The SQ ratios of luxI, qsrP, ribB, and acfA mRNA to nadB mRNA are shown at four points during growth. OD600 of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 are indicated by light gray, black, dark gray, and white bars, respectively. The results are representative of the results for triplicate samples from two trials, and the error bars indicate the standard deviations from the means. Note the exponential scale.

The SQ of qsrP/nadB, ribB/nadB, and acfA/nadB were much lower than that of luxI/nadB (note the exponential scale in Fig. 4). However, the former three transcripts were expressed in a pattern similar to that of luxI. The amount of the transcripts was significantly greater than the background amount at an OD600 of 0.5, and the level of expression was roughly maintained at OD600 of 1.0 and 2.0. Hence, similar to the results obtained with the ß-galactosidase reporters in recombinant E. coli, the RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that qsrP, ribB, and acfA are temporally expressed in a pattern like that of luxI. However, the expression of these three genes was found to be significantly lower than that of luxI in the RT-PCR analysis. This was not predicted based on the ß-galactosidase assays performed with the heterologous host E. coli. The apparent discrepancy may be resolved by considering that in the ß-galactosidase assays, it is not only the rate of transcription but also the stability of the transcript, the rate of translation of lacZ mRNA, and the stability of LacZ that contribute to the final output measured. In the case of real-time RT-PCR, the pool of a particular mRNA of interest is measured and is dependent on the rate of transcription and the stability of the mRNA. To help further determine the relative expression levels of the LuxR regulon genes, EMSA were performed to ascertain whether differences in the DNA binding affinity of LuxR to the lux box of these genes were a key parameter in controlling expression levels.

Affinity of LuxR for the lux boxes of the genes in the LuxR regulon. EMSA were used to determine the relative LuxR binding affinities for DNA fragments containing the lux boxes from the luxI, qsrP, acfA, and ribB promoters (Fig. 1B). In addition, the luxD box, a proposed lux box internal to luxD within the lux operon that has been hypothesized to be involved in negative regulation of the lux operon (30), was also used as a binding site for LuxR. The promoter of luxR itself served as a negative control. In the presence of 6 µM autoinducer, LuxR could bind to the promoter regions of four of the five lux box sequences examined (Fig. 5). A direct interaction between LuxR and the luxI, qsrP, acfA, and ribB promoters was definitively established. However, a direct association of LuxR with the luxD box could not be established under the conditions that were utilized, even when the ratio of protein to probe was increased 10- to 20-fold (data not shown). Therefore, in contrast to a previous proposal (30), this suggests that the luxD box may not play a major role in regulation of the lux genes. The dissociation constant (KD) of LuxR for the DNA was roughly calculated by determining the protein concentration that shifted 50% of the probe. KD values of 0.55 nM for PluxI, 1.96 nM for PqsrP, 0.60 nM for PribB, and 1.22 nM for PacfA demonstrated that LuxR has higher affinities for PluxI and PribB and lower affinities for PqsrP and PacfA. However, all of the KD values were within fourfold of one another, suggesting that the weaker expression of qsrP, acfA, and ribB in V. fischeri measured via real-time RT-PCR was not due to dramatic differences in the affinity of LuxR for the promoters under study. Thus, the difference in expression is most likely due to the altered efficiencies in the interactions between LuxR and RNA polymerase, the rate of open complex formation, or the stability of the mRNA.


Figure 5
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 5. EMSA demonstrating LuxR binding to luxRI, luxI, qsrP, ribB, and acfA promoter DNA. Each lane contained approximately 1 fmol of probe (for luxRI, 1 fmol of both probes) and the concentration of LuxR indicated at the top (nM) with 6 µM 3-oxo-C6-HSL. The results are representative of the results of assays done in duplicate.

Conclusions. Direct LuxR-dependent transcription of qsrP, acfA, and ribB from V. fischeri MJ-100 has been demonstrated. Activation of transcription of these genes occurs during mid-exponential growth, similar to temporal expression of the lux operon. However, real-time RT-PCR analysis indicated that the amounts of the qsrP, acfA, and ribB transcripts present in the cell's mRNA pool are significantly lower than the amount of luxI. EMSA demonstrated that LuxR has a slightly higher affinity for the lux boxes in the luxI and ribB promoters than for those in the qsrP and acfA promoters. LuxR binding to the luxD box, however, could not be demonstrated. The establishment here of a LuxR regulon in V. fischeri may provide insights into the optimal binding site for LuxR and lead to the identification of other LuxR-dependent genes.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank E. Peter Greenberg for providing LuxR protein and advice on an internal control for the real-time RT-PCR, Tim Larson for providing the lacZ reporter plasmid, Andre Levchenko for his support of this project, and the Virginia Bioinformatics Institute Core Laboratory for working with us to develop the real-time RT-PCR protocol.

Work in the Stevens lab was funded by the Virginia Tech Graduate Research Development Project (N.Q.), by NSF career award MCB-9875479 to A.M.S., and by the National Institutes of Health (grant GM066786 sub contract to A.M.S.).


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061. Phone: (540) 231-9378. Fax: (540) 231-9307. E-mail: ams{at}vt.edu Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 30 March 2007. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Busby, S., and R. H. Ebright. 1999. Transcription activation by catabolite activator protein (CAP). J. Mol. Biol. 293:199-213.[CrossRef][Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Callahan, S. M., and P. V. Dunlap. 2000. LuxR-and acyl-homoserine-lactone-controlled non-lux genes define a quorum-sensing regulon in Vibrio fischeri. J. Bacteriol. 182:2811-2822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Choi, S. H., and E. P. Greenberg. 1991. The C-terminal region of the Vibrio fischeri LuxR protein contains an inducer-independent lux gene activating domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:11115-11119.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Choi, S. H., and E. P. Greenberg. 1992. Genetic dissection of DNA binding and luminescence gene activation by the Vibrio fischeri LuxR protein. J. Bacteriol. 174:4064-4069.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    5. 5
  5. Devine, J. H., G. S. Shadel, and T. O. Baldwin. 1989. Identification of the operator of the lux regulon from the Vibrio fischeri strain ATCC7744. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:5688-5692.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Dunlap, P. V. 1989. Regulation of luminescence by cyclic AMP in cya-like and crp-like mutants of Vibrio fischeri. J. Bacteriol. 171:1199-1202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    7. 7
  7. Dunlap, P. V., and A. Kuo. 1992. Cell density dependent modulation of the Vibrio fischeri luminescence system in the absence of autoinducer and LuxR protein. J. Bacteriol. 174:2440-2448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. Eberhard, A. A. L. Burlingame, C. Eberhard, G. L. Kenyon, and N. J. Oppenheimer. 1981. Structural identification of autoinducer of Photobacterium fischeri luciferase. Biochemistry 20:2444-2449.[CrossRef][Medline]
    9. 9
  9. Egland, K. A., and E. P. Greenberg. 2000. Conversion of the Vibrio fischeri transcriptional activator, LuxR, to a repressor. J. Bacteriol. 182:805-811.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 10
  10. Finney, A. H., R. J. Blick, K. Murakami, A. Ishihama, and A. M. Stevens. 2002. Role of the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase in LuxR-dependent transcriptional activation of the lux operon during quorum sensing. J. Bacteriol. 184:4520-4528.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Fuqua, C., M. R. Parsek, and E. P. Greenberg. 2001. Regulation of gene expression by cell-to-cell communication: acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35:439-468.[CrossRef][Medline]
    12. 12
  12. Gilson, L., A. Kuo, and P. V. Dunlap. 1995. AinS and a new family of autoinducer synthesis proteins. J. Bacteriol. 177:6946-6951.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Gourse, R. L., W. Ross, and T. Gaal. 2000. UPs and downs in bacterial transcription initiation: the role of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase in promoter recognition. Mol. Microbiol. 37:687-695.[CrossRef][Medline]
    14. 14
  14. Hanahan, D. 1983. Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J. Mol. Biol. 166:557-580.[Medline]
    15. 15
  15. Hanzelka, B. L., and E. P. Greenberg. 1995. Evidence that the N-terminal region of the Vibrio fischeri LuxR protein constitutes an autoinducer-binding domain. J. Bacteriol. 177:815-817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 16
  16. Johnson, D. C., A. Ishihama, and A. M. Stevens. 2003. Involvement of region 4 of the {sigma}70 subunit of RNA polymerase in transcriptional activation of the lux operon during quorum sensing. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 228:193-201.[CrossRef][Medline]
    17. 17
  17. Kolibachuk, D., and E. P. Greenberg. 1993. The Vibrio fischeri luminescence gene activator LuxR is a membrane-associated protein. J. Bacteriol. 175:7307-7312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. Kuo, A., N. V. Blough, and P. V. Dunlap. 1994. Multiple N-acyl-L-homoserine lactone autoinducers of luminescence in the marine symbiotic bacterium Vibrio fischeri. J. Bacteriol. 176:7558-7565.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    19. 19
  19. Lupp, C., and E. G. Ruby. 2005. Vibrio fischeri uses two quorum-sensing systems for the regulation of early and late colonization factors. J. Bacteriol. 187:3620-3629.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    20. 20
  20. Nealson, K. H. 1978. Isolation, identification, and manipulation of luminous bacteria. Methods Enzymol. 57:153-166.
    21. 21
  21. Pappas, K. M., C. L. Weingart, and S. C. Winans. 2004. Chemical communication in proteobacteria: biochemical and structural studies of signal synthases and receptors required for intercellular signalling. Mol. Microbiol. 53:755-769.[CrossRef][Medline]
    22. 22
  22. Peterson, K. M., and J. J. Mekalanos. 1988. Characterization of the Vibrio cholerae ToxR regulon: identification of novel genes involved in intestinal colonization. Infect. Immun. 56:2822-2829.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    23. 23
  23. Podkovyrov, S. M., and T. J. Larson. 1995. A new vector-host system for construction of lacZ transcriptional fusions where only low-level gene expression is desirable. Gene 156:151-152.[CrossRef][Medline]
    24. 24
  24. Reading, N. C., and V. Sperandio. 2006. Quorum sensing: the many languages of bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 254:1-11.[CrossRef][Medline]
    25. 25
  25. Rhodius, V. A., and S. J. Busby. 1998. Positive activation of gene expression. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1:152-159.[CrossRef][Medline]
    26. 26
  26. Richter, G., R. Volk, C. Krieger, H. W. Lahm, U. Rothlisberger, and A. Bacher. 1992. Biosynthesis of riboflavin: cloning, sequencing and expression of the gene coding for 3,4-dihydroxy-2-butanone 4-phosphate synthase of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 174:4050-4056.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    27. 27
  27. Ruby, E. G., and K. H. Nealson. 1976. Symbiotic association of Photobacterium fischeri with the marine luminous fish Monocentris japonica: a model of symbiosis based on bacterial studies. Biol. Bull. 141:574-586.
    28. 28
  28. Ruby, E. G., M. Urbanowski, J. Campbell, A. Dunn, M. Faini, R. P. Gunsalus, P. Lostroh, C. Lupp, J. McCann, D. Millikan, A. Schaefer, E. Stabb, A. Stevens, K. Visick, C. Whistler, and E. P. Greenberg. 2005. Complete genome sequence of Vibrio fischeri: a symbiotic bacterium with pathogenic congeners. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:3004-3009.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    29. 29
  29. Schuster, M., M. L. Urbanowski, and E. P. Greenberg. 2004. Promoter specificity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing revealed by DNA binding of purified LasR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:15833-15839.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    30. 30
  30. Shadel, G. S., and T. O. Baldwin. 1992. Identification of a distantly located regulatory element in the luxD gene required for negative autoregulation of the Vibrio fischeri luxR gene. J. Biol. Chem. 267:7690-7695.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    31. 31
  31. Simon, R., M. O'Connell, M. Labes, and A. Puhler. 1986. Plasmid vector for genetic analysis and manipulation of rhizobia and other Gram-negative bacteria. Methods Enzymol. 118:640-659.[Medline]
    32. 32
  32. Stevens, A. M., N. Fujita, A. Ishihama, and E. P. Greenberg. 1999. Involvement of the RNA polymerase {alpha} subunit C-terminal domain in LuxR-dependent activation of the Vibrio fischeri luminescence genes. J. Bacteriol. 181:4704-4707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    33. 33
  33. Stevens, A. M., and E. P. Greenberg. 1999. Transcriptional activation by LuxR, p. 231-242. In G. M. Dunny and S. C Winans (ed.), Cell-cell signaling in bacteria. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
    34. 34
  34. Urbanowski, M. L., C. P. Lostroh, and E. P. Greenberg. 2004. Reversible acyl-homoserine lactone binding to purified Vibrio fischeri LuxR protein. J. Bacteriol. 186:631-637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    35. 35
  35. Visick, K. L. 2005. Layers of signaling in a bacterium-host association. J. Bacteriol. 187:3603-3606.[Free Full Text]
    36. 36
  36. Wagner, V. E., D. Bushnell, L. Passador, A. I. Brooks, and B. H. Iglewski. 2003. Microarray analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing regulons: effects of growth phase and environment. J. Bacteriol. 185:2080-2095.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    37. 37
  37. Wang, J., N. B. Shoemaker, G. R. Wang, and A. A. Salyers. 2000. Characterization of a Bacteroides mobilization transposon, NBU2, which carries a functional lincomycin resistance gene. J. Bacteriol. 182:3559-3571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    38. 38
  38. Waters, C. M., and B. L. Bassler. 2005. Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21:319-346.[CrossRef][Medline]
    39. 39
  39. White, C. E., and S. C. Winans. 2005. Identification of amino acid residues of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens quorum-sensing regulator TraR that are critical for positive control of transcription. Mol. Microbiol. 55:1473-1486.[CrossRef][Medline]
    40. 40
  40. Whitehead, N. A., A. M. Barnard, H. Slater, N. J. Simpson, and G. P. Salmond. 2001. Quorum-sensing in Gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 25:365-404.[CrossRef][Medline]
    41. 41
  41. Withers, H., S. Swift, and P. Williams. 2001. Quorum sensing as an integral component of gene regulatory networks in Gram-negative bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 4:186-193.[CrossRef][Medline]
    42. 42
  42. Yanisch-Perron, C., J. Vieira, and J. Messing. 1985. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene 33:103-119.[CrossRef][Medline]

Journal of Bacteriology, June 2007, p. 4127-4134, Vol. 189, No. 11
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.01779-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Antunes, L. C. M., Schaefer, A. L., Ferreira, R. B. R., Qin, N., Stevens, A. M., Ruby, E. G., Greenberg, E. P. (2007). Transcriptome Analysis of the Vibrio fischeri LuxR-LuxI Regulon. J. Bacteriol. 189: 8387-8391 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Muller, J. F., Stevens, A. M., Craig, J., Love, N. G. (2007). Transcriptome Analysis Reveals that Multidrug Efflux Genes Are Upregulated To Protect Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Pentachlorophenol Stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 4550-4558 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qin, N.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qin, N.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, A. M.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»