Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, July 2007, p. 4739-4748, Vol. 189, No. 13
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01889-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospital,1 Department of Pathology and Immunology,2 Department of Cell Physiology and Metabolism, Geneva Medical School,4 Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland3
Received 14 December 2006/ Accepted 13 April 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since chlamydiae are notably very atypical bacteria, phylogenetically separated from other eubacteria (48), we have conducted a detailed structural characterization of MIP. The probable signal sequence was determined by in silico analysis, and the cysteine in position 20 (cysteine20) was predicted to be the lipobox cysteine (33, 44). To assess the involvement of cysteine20 in lipid modification, an rMIP variant was prepared by replacing cysteine20 with alanine (C20A) using site-directed mutagenesis (17). To characterize the structure of the lipid moiety, U-14C-esterified glycerol and [U-14C]palmitic acid attachments to the lipobox cysteine, as well as peptide signal release, were examined for both wild-type (WT) rMIP and the C20A rMIP variant. The fatty acid contents of native and WT rMIP were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and amide linkage of any fatty acid present was investigated by alkaline methanolysis for WT rMIP. To define its subcellular localization and possible surface exposure, the presence of native MIP was examined in a chlamydial outer membrane complex (COMC) preparation, and its presence at the surfaces of EB was investigated by surface biotinylation and surface immunoprecipitation experiments.
|
|
|---|
In silico analysis. Three different computer prediction programs were used to detect the pattern characterizing bacterial lipoprotein precursors in MIP sequences. The pattern is a well-conserved cysteine-containing "lipobox" of four residues within the lipoprotein signal peptide sequence. The bioinformatics tools used were PROSITE (accession number PS000013; www.expasy.org/prosite/) (30), DOLOP (database of bacterial lipoproteins; available at www.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/genomes/dolop/) (44) with (L/V/I)(A/S/T/V/I)(G/A/S)C as the consensus pattern, and LipoP (accessible at www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/LipoP/) (33).
Homologues of proteins required for precursor export and lipoprotein biosynthesis in E. coli were searched for in the complete proteomes of five different chlamydial species. Complete proteomes deduced from genomic sequences (28, 35, 52, 53, 59, 63) were available at the HAMAP (high-quality automated and manual annotation of microbial proteomes) site (http://www.expasy.org/sprot/hamap/).
Bacteria. EB of C. trachomatis LGV2 strain 434 (inactivated by a photochemical treatment affecting bacterial genomes) were either purchased from Biodesign International (Milan Analytica AG, Le Milan, Switzerland) or prepared according to the method of Boleti et al. (5).
Preparation of WT rMIP and the C20A rMIP variant. The preparation of WT rMIP from C. trachomatis has been described previously (1). The C20A rMIP variant was prepared by in vitro site-directed mutagenesis as follows. Template DNA for the PCR was obtained from a purified WT rMIP plasmid clone (1). Bases coding for cysteine were replaced by bases coding for alanine with the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit from Stratagene (Amsterdam Zuidoost, The Netherlands). For the amplification reaction, the following oligonucleotide primers containing the desired mutations (boldfaced) were used: 5'-TGCCTATCGTAGGAGCTGATAACGGAGGCGGTTCGC-3' for the 5' end and 5'-GCGAACCGCCTCCGTTATCAGCTCCTACGATAGGCA-3' for the 3' end. Other conditions have been described previously (1).
Immunization of rabbits with WT rMIP and development of polyclonal antibodies. Two female New Zealand White rabbits (weight, 2.0 to 2.5 kg) were used by Covalab (Lyon, France) to produce antibodies to WT rMIP. Before immunization, the preimmune sera were collected for use as controls. For the first immunization, each rabbit was injected intradermally with purified endotoxin-free WT rMIP (50 µg). The injected proteins (0.5 ml) were emulsified with an equal volume of Freund's complete adjuvant. Animals were subsequently injected three times at 3-week intervals with the same immunogen emulsified with incomplete Freund's adjuvant. Injections were performed intradermally, except for the last, which was done subcutaneously. Antisera of immunized animals were collected 11 days after the third and fourth booster immunizations and examined for the presence of MIP-specific antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Rabbits were sacrificed 82 days following the first injection. The immunoglobulin G (IgG) fraction of the antiserum was isolated using an immobilized protein A-agarose column.
Immunoblot analysis. Proteins from EB and from E. coli clones expressing either WT rMIP or C20A rMIP were separated on 12% Tris-glycine sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gels under reducing conditions, electrophoretically transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and probed with rabbit polyclonal anti-MIP IgG diluted 1/5,000 and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., LabForce AG, Nunningen, Switzerland) diluted 1/10,000. The membrane was developed with the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) immunoblot detection system before visualization with Hyperfilm (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom).
In vivo radiolabeling of WT rMIP and the C20A rMIP variant with phosphatidic acid-L-
-dipalmitoyl-[U-14C]glycerol or [U-14C]palmitic acid.
Experimental conditions were those described by Lundemose et al. (42). Briefly, cultures of recombinant E. coli M15(pREP4) expressing WT rMIP and the C20A rMIP variant in Luria-Bertani broth (LB) medium were induced with 0.4 mM isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; Eurogentec, Geneva, Switzerland). One microcurie of phosphatidic acid-L-
-dipalmitoyl-[U-14C]glycerol (specific activity, 140 mCi/mmol; Perkin-Elmer, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland), or 1 µCi of [U-14C]palmitic acid (specific activity, 780 mCi/mmol; Amersham Biosciences), dissolved in toluene, dried with N2 gas, and suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 1% Triton X-100, was added to 100 µl of culture, and cultivation was continued for 1 h. To some samples, globomycin (a generous gift of Shunichi Miyakoshi, Sankyo, Tokyo, Japan) dissolved in 95% ethanol at 20 mg ml1 (final concentration, 100 µg ml1) was added 10 min before induction. The control cultures received an equivalent volume of 95% ethanol. Cells were centrifuged, resuspended in SDS sample buffer, heated for 5 min at 95°C, and subjected to 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) with low-range Rainbow molecular weight (MW) markers that had been [14C] labeled (2,500 to 45,000 Da) (Amersham Biosciences). The same amounts of induced WT rMIP and C20A rMIP variant upper bands were loaded onto the gel (in preliminary experiments, the corresponding volumes of cells were determined after band quantification using a densitograph and OptiQuant software). Gels were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and visualized by autoradiography before being probed with the anti-penta-His monoclonal antibody (MAb) (QIAGEN AG, Basel, Switzerland).
N-terminal amino acid sequencing. Purified WT rMIP was separated on 18% SDS-PAGE gels (Novex; Invitrogen, Basel, Switzerland) under reducing conditions and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Immobilon-PSQ; Millipore, Volketswil, Switzerland) using a semidry transfer cell (Novex, Invitrogen) in 10 mM 3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-propane sulfonic acid (CAPS) buffer, pH 11, containing 10% (vol/vol) methanol. The blot was stained with Ponceau Red S and dried, and bands of interest were excised. Samples were then subjected to four cycles of Edman degradation (Atheris Laboratories, Geneva, Switzerland).
Purification of native MIP by immunoprecipitation. A total of 2 x 1010 EB were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in 1 ml of a solution containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and protease inhibitor cocktail (Complete, EDTA-free; Roche Diagnostics AG, Rotkreuz, Switzerland), and disrupted by sonication before addition of an equal volume of buffer containing 1% SDS, 2% Triton X-100, and 20 mM ß-mercaptoethanol. After 1 h of extraction at 4°C, insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 5 min at 4°C. A Seize X protein A immunoprecipitation kit (Pierce, Perbio Science, Lausanne, Switzerland) was then used according to the manufacturer's instructions to purify native MIP. Briefly, purified IgG antibodies raised in rabbits against WT rMIP were used to probe native MIP from the EB lysate. Antibodies were chemically cross-linked to a protein A gel with the bifunctional reagent disuccinimidyl suberate. The EB lysate was then incubated with the immobilized antibody to form the immune complex. After a wash, native MIP was eluted with 0.1 M glycine (pH 2.5) and immediately neutralized with Tris-HCl.
Identification of fatty acids associated with native and WT rMIP after acid and base hydrolysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. To evaluate the proportions of ester-linked and amide-linked fatty acids, two types of hydrolysis were performed. Fatty acids bonded through ester or amide linkages were liberated by strong-acid hydrolysis, whereas only esterified fatty acids were released by a base treatment. Strong-acid hydrolysis was performed in 6 M HCl at 100°C overnight under nitrogen and was followed by fatty acid saponification in KOH. Alkaline hydrolysis was performed in 5% KOH in aqueous methanol at 100°C overnight under nitrogen. After acidification, fatty acids were subsequently recovered by repeated extraction with methylene chloride and purified using anion-exchange solid-phase extraction cartridges (Separtis AG, Grellingen, Switzerland), highly selective for acidic compounds. Then fatty acids were methyl esterified with 14% (vol/vol) boron trifluoride in methanol (Fluka AG, Buchs, Switzerland) and recovered by repeated extraction with methylene chloride. At last, hydroxyl groups were further derivatized to trimethylsilyl ethers by the addition of N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide, to identify possible hydroxylated fatty acids. All the analytes were then analyzed with a DB-5 fused silica capillary column (length, 30 m; inner diameter, 0.25 mm; film thickness, 0.25 µm) (Agilent J & W Scientific, Basel, Switzerland). Analytical gas-liquid chromatography was carried out on a Hewlett-Packard 5890 gas-liquid chromatograph interfaced with a quadrupole mass spectrometer (Trio-2 VG; Masslab, Manchester, United Kingdom). For sample analysis, the column temperature was held at 80°C for 1 min before it was raised to 300°C at a rate of 3°C min1. Electron impact mass spectra were obtained at 70 eV, and individual fatty acid methyl esters were identified by their fragmentation pattern and ion masses. Fatty acid methyl ester levels are given as percentages of the total peak area recovered on the chromatogram.
Mild-alkaline hydrolysis of [U-14C]palmitic acid-labeled WT rMIP. E. coli cells expressing WT rMIP were grown in LB medium in the presence of 0.4 mM IPTG and 100 µg ml1 globomycin and were labeled with [U-14C]palmitic acid. Bacteria were pelleted, washed, treated at 37°C for 2 h with 0.1 N NaOH in 90% methanol, and neutralized. Proteins were next separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and silver stained with a Silver Stain Plus kit (Bio-Rad, Reinach, Switzerland). Gels were dried and subjected to autoradiography. Digital images were processed using a densitograph and OptiQuant software.
Preparation of COMC. COMC was prepared as described previously (49). Briefly, C. trachomatis L2 EB were suspended (5 mg ml1 of EB protein) in PBS, pH 7.4, containing 2% (wt/vol) Sarkosyl (Sigma, Fluka AG) and 1 mM EDTA. This suspension was incubated at 37°C for 1 h with mixing every 5 min and was then centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 1 h. The insoluble pellet was resuspended in the same buffer with 10 mM dithiothreitol, incubated for 1 h at 37°C with mixing every 5 min, and centrifuged as described above. The pellet was washed twice in PBS to remove excess detergent. This Sarkosyl-insoluble material consisted of COMC (10). Proteins from Sarkosyl-soluble and -insoluble fractions were subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE analysis and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. MIP was detected with polyclonal anti-MIP IgG diluted 1/5,000, major outer membrane protein (MOMP) with an anti-MOMP MAb (clone 165; Biodesign International) diluted 1/5,000, and soluble S1 with anti-S1 ribosomal protein MAb 124.4 (39) diluted 1/1,000. Membranes were next probed with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) diluted 1/10,000 and developed with the ECL immunoblot detection system before visualization with Hyperfilm (Amersham Biosciences). Digital images were processed using a densitograph and OptiQuant software.
EB surface biotinylation. For total-protein biotinylation, 109 EB were solubilized in lysis buffer containing 1% Triton X-100 in PBS and EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Complete; Roche). Solubilization was carried out by overnight rotation at 4°C. For surface biotinylation, 109 EB were washed three times with ice-cold PBS (pH 8.0) and resuspended in PBS. The biotinylation reaction was performed with 2 mM sulfosuccinimidyl-6-(biotinamido)hexanoate (sulfo-NHS-LC-biotin; Pierce) for 1 min on ice. For EB lysate, the residual sulfo-NHS-LC-biotin was quenched with 10 mM Tris and inactivated biotin was eliminated by buffer exchange using a desalting column. For surface-biotinylated EB, quenching was performed by three washes with 10 mM Tris and inactivated biotin was removed by two washes with PBS (pH 8.0). Surface-biotinylated EB were subsequently lysed with 1% Triton X-100. Biotin-labeled proteins were separated from unlabeled proteins by affinity purification using streptavidin-agarose beads (Amersham Biosciences). The beads were first preincubated in 10 mM Tris and 3% bovine serum albumin in order to prevent nonspecific protein binding. After capture of biotinylated proteins, elution by boiling in Laemmli sample buffer, SDS-PAGE analysis, and membrane transfer, MIP was probed with rabbit polyclonal anti-MIP IgG and HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and hsp60 was probed with a MAb against hsp60, kindly provided in ascitic fluid by Ian Maclean (University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada), and HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Labeled proteins were detected with the ECL immunoblot detection system before visualization with Hyperfilm (Amersham Biosciences).
Surface immunoprecipitation of native MIP. To investigate possible surface exposure of C. trachomatis MIP, surface immunoprecipitation of MIP was performed according to the work of Shang et al. (58). Briefly, 0.5 x 1010 intact EB were mixed with rabbit polyclonal anti-MIP IgG or biotinylated MAb 124.4 against soluble S1 ribosomal protein (39) and gently shaken for 2 h at 30°C. Agglutinated EB were pelleted at 2,000 x g for 15 min, resuspended in 5 mM MgCl2 in PBS, pelleted again at 2,000 x g for 15 min, and then resuspended in 450 µl of a solution containing 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Complete, EDTA-free; Roche). To this suspension 50 µl of 10% protein-grade Triton X-100 (Calbiochem, Juro Supply, GmbH, Lucerne, Switzerland) was added, and the mixture was agitated overnight at 4°C. The insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 16,000 x g for 20 min. Sodium deoxycholate (final concentration, 0.2%), SDS (0.1%), and 20 µl of a slurry of protein G-Sepharose or streptavidin-agarose beads (Amersham Biosciences) were added to the supernatant. These mixtures were gently agitated for 1 h at 4°C. The protein G-Sepharose- or streptavidin-agarose-antibody-antigen complexes were washed three times in 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.5)-500 mM NaCl-1% Triton X-100-0.2% deoxycholate-1 mM EDTA and once in 10 mM Tris-HCl and were finally resuspended in sample buffer. Samples were then processed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with rabbit polyclonal anti-MIP IgG or anti-S1 ribosomal protein MAb 124.4 and HRP-IgG conjugates (Amersham Biosciences). Labeled proteins were visualized by chemiluminescence. Immunoprecipitation control experiments were performed in parallel under the same conditions as those described above except that either no antibody or preimmune serum was mixed with intact EB. As an additional control, S1 ribosomal protein was also immunoprecipitated from EB lysates.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (78K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Sequence alignment of Chlamydia trachomatis (accession number P26623), Chlamydia muridarum (Q9PJK1), Chlamydophila pneumoniae (Q9ZP3), Chlamydophila caviae (Q824R2), and "Ca. Protochlamydia amoebophila" (Q6ME92) MIPs as performed by the CLUSTAL multiple alignment program. Asterisks indicate identities, and colons (conserved substitutions) and periods (semiconserved substitutions) indicate similarities, in the lines below the sequences.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Prediction of Chlamydia MIPs (FKBP-type PPIases) as putative lipoproteins according to different bioinformatic tools
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Gene names, accession numbers, and definitions in Swiss-Prot/TrEMBL of Chlamydia trachomatisa proteins homologous to those required for secretory machinery and lipoprotein biosynthesis in Escherichia coli
|
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Immunodetection of MIP in C. trachomatis EB and in cultures of E. coli M15(pREP4) overexpressing WT rMIP-His6 and the C20A rMIP-His6 variant. Proteins were separated by 12% Tris-glycine SDS-PAGE, blotted onto a membrane, and detected with rabbit polyclonal anti-MIP IgG and HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG. Molecular mass markers (in kilodaltons) are indicated on the left. In cultures of rMIP, two forms of the protein were detected. The solid arrow indicates the position of a protein of about 32 kDa, consistent in MW with the precursor-like forms and present in both WT rMIP-His6 and the C20A rMIP-His6 variant. The open arrow indicates the position of a protein of about 27.6 kDa, consistent in MW with the mature-like form and present only in WT rMIP-His6. In C. trachomatis EB, the MW of the mature form is about 1 kDa lower than that in WT rMIP due to the absence of the His6 tag in the COOH-terminal position.
|
-dipalmitoyl-[U-14C]glycerol, which is known as a substrate for the enzyme diacylglyceryl transferase (56). This precursor was used instead of [U-14C]glycerol to avoid nonspecific labeling by glycerol catabolite products. When this esterified glyceryl donor was used, a main radioactive band of 32 kDa and a faint band of 27.6 kDa were detected in the total-cell extract of the WT rMIP clone whereas no radioactive band was detected in the C20A rMIP clone (Fig. 3). These results indicated that a substantial amount of U-14C-esterified glycerol was used in WT rMIP lipidation and allowed identification of the radioactive 32-kDa band as the diacylglyceryl-modified prolipoprotein and of the radioactive 27.6-kDa band as the diacylglyceryl-modified lipoprotein obtained after peptide signal release.
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Immunodetection and diacylglycerol radiolabeling of rMIP in cultures of E. coli M15(pREP4) overexpressing WT rMIP-His6 and the C20A rMIP-His6 variant. Cells were grown in LB medium. Expression of WT rMIP and C20A rMIP was induced by the addition of 0.4 mM IPTG, and MIPs were further labeled with phosphatidic acid-L- -dipalmitoyl-[U-14C]glycerol. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, His6-tagged proteins were detected with the anti-penta-His MAb, and labeled proteins were visualized by autoradiography. Solid arrows indicate the position of a protein of about 32 kDa, corresponding to the precursor forms and present in both WT rMIP-His6 and the C20A rMIP-His6 variant. Open arrows indicate the position of a protein of about 27.6 kDa, corresponding to the mature form and present only in WT rMIP His6.
|
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Immunodetection and palmitic acid radiolabeling of rMIP in cultures of E. coli M15(pREP4) expressing WT rMIP-His6 and the C20A rMIP-His6 variant. Cells were grown in LB medium either in the presence (+) or in the absence () of 0.4 mM IPTG, vehicle (ethanol), and 100 µg ml1 globomycin. Proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE, His6-tagged proteins were detected with the anti-penta-His MAb, and labeled proteins were visualized by autoradiography. Solid arrows indicate the prolipoprotein forms, and open arrows indicate the mature form of WT rMIP.
|
To further analyze the lipid component of MIP, fatty acids were identified in purified native MIP as well as WT rMIP by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. Native MIP was purified by immunoprecipitation and WT rMIP by nickel chelate affinity chromatography (1). The types and distributions of fatty acids present in the native and WT rMIP proteins were very similar, comprising C12:0 to C22:0 fatty acids, with three major fatty acids (accounting for more than 92% of total fatty acids) corresponding to n-C18:0, n-C16:0, and n-C14:0. Branched (i.e., isosaturated and anteisosaturated) fatty acids were found with odd carbon numbers (C15 and C17) in very small amounts (Table 3). The presence of characteristic fatty acids i-C15:0 and ai-C15:0 in C. trachomatis has been reported previously (3, 19). No unsaturated or hydroxylated fatty acids were identified. The same fatty acids, in the same proportions, were predominant in acid and base hydrolysates of native and WT rMIP proteins, indicating that the E. coli vector system is capable of providing a reliable source of rMIP that has a fatty acid composition very similar to that of the native MIP.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Types and distributions of fatty acids identified from purified native and WT rMIP proteins
|
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Mild alkaline hydrolysis of [U-14C]palmitic acid-labeled WT rMIP. E. coli M15(pREP4) cells expressing WT rMIP were grown in LB medium in the presence of 0.4 mM IPTG and 100 µg ml1 globomycin and were labeled with [U-14C]palmitic acid. Bacteria were pelleted, washed, treated with 0.1 N NaOH in methanol for 2 h, and neutralized. Proteins were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and silver stained, and the gel was dried and subjected to autoradiography. Results from one representative experiment are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Subcellular localization of native MIP. COMC was prepared after EB treatment in the weak anionic detergent sodium lauryl sarcosinate (Sarkosyl). Proteins from Sarkosyl-soluble and -insoluble (COMC) fractions of intact EB were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Equivalent starting amounts of EB were present in Sarkosyl-soluble and -insoluble fractions. MIP was detected with rabbit polyclonal anti-MIP IgG, MOMP with an anti-MOMP MAb (clone 165), and soluble S1 ribosomal protein with anti-S1 MAb 124.4 (39).
|
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Immunoblot analysis of streptavidin-bound fractions from nonbiotinylated, surface-biotinylated, and lysate-biotinylated EB. Intact EB were either left untreated or biotinylated with sulfo-NHS-LC-biotin (Pierce) for 1 min on ice and then lysed. Intact EB were also lysed before being biotinylated. All biotinylated molecules were captured with streptavidin-agarose. Streptavidin-bound fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. MIP was probed with polyclonal anti-MIP IgG (A) and hsp60 with an anti-hsp60 MAb (B).
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Surface immunoprecipitation of native MIP. Intact EB were incubated with either no antibody, preimmune serum, polyclonal anti-MIP IgG, or biotinylated MAb 124.4 against soluble S1 ribosomal protein (39) and lysed. MIP was immunoprecipitated in the presence of protein G-Sepharose, and the S1 antigen-biotinylated antibody complex was captured with streptavidin-agarose. Samples were then processed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with rabbit polyclonal anti-MIP IgG or a streptavidin-HRP conjugate. (A and B) Labeled proteins were visualized by chemiluminescence. (B) A lysate of EB was also prepared, mixed with biotinylated MAb 124.4 against soluble S1 ribosomal protein, and then processed as described above.
|
|
|
|---|
The first step of MIP synthesis, i.e., the addition of a diacylglycerol moiety to lipobox cysteine20, was demonstrated by the incorporation of radiolabeled esterified glycerol and radiolabeled palmitic acid into WT rMIP, whereas no label was incorporated into the C20A rMIP variant. However, a difference in WT rMIP labeling was observed between the two precursors: when phosphatidic acid-L-
-dipalmitoyl-[U-14C]glycerol was used as an esterified glycerol donor, both the mature and precursor forms of WT rMIP were radioactive, whereas when [U-14C]palmitic acid was used as a fatty acid precursor, only the mature form was radioactive. The accumulation of the precursor form (i.e., of diacylglyceryl-modified prolipoprotein) observed when phosphatidic acid-L-
-dipalmitoyl[U-14C]glycerol was used as a precursor implies that signal peptidase II was a rate-limiting step. One explanation could be the wrong configuration of the dipalmitoyl glycerol moiety transferred from phosphatidic acid to the prolipoprotein. Such a scenario is possible, since an asymmetric C atom is present at the 2 position of the esterified glycerol. The commercial preparation has the R configuration, whereas the natural substrate has the S configuration (65). The next step, involving the cleavage of the signal peptide, was demonstrated by the inhibition of WT rMIP processing in the presence of globomycin, a specific inhibitor of signal peptidase II. The subsequent step, involving the aminoacylation of the cysteine residue by an amide-linked fatty acid, was investigated both by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of native and WT rMIP and by mild-alkaline methanolysis of WT rMIP. Both procedures demonstrated that aminoacylation was not completed. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of WT rMIP found no amide-linked fatty acid, whereas a small amount was found by alkaline methanolysis, a treatment that releases ester-linked but not amide-linked fatty acids (47). Indeed, about 10% of [U-14C]palmitic acid radioactivity remained linked to WT rMIP after alkaline methanolysis, whereas 33% should remain in the case of total acylation, with one amide-linked and two ester-linked acyl chains. Even in native MIP, the NH2-terminal cysteine residue did not appear to be completely modified with amide-linked fatty acids, because a mass ratio of total fatty acids to ester-linked fatty acids of 1.12 was obtained; in the case of total acylation, this ratio should be 1.5. The present ratio of 1.12 indicated that only 24% of cysteine20 in native MIP had amide-linked acyl chains. Taken together, this would imply that even if native MIP appears to have a slightly higher proportion of amide-linked acyl chains, the two forms of MIP are similar and are products of incomplete posttranslational modifications, as has been reported previously for other bacterial lipoproteins (6, 7, 14, 15).
Overall, these results confirm that E. coli processes WT rMIP using a pathway identical to that for its own lipoproteins, except that posttranslational modifications can become rate-limiting steps, as evidenced by the fact that E. coli expressed WT rMIP both as a precursor and as the mature form, as previously reported (6, 13, 15, 36, 70). In C. trachomatis, the lipoprotein biosynthetic pathway is not known. The fact that protein homologues of all essential components of the Sec general secretion pathway in E. coli were found in chlamydiae supports the notion that prolipoprotein translocation across the inner membrane involves Sec translocase (16). Since homologues of enzymes required for lipoprotein biosynthesis in E. coli were also found in chlamydiae, subsequent lipid modification most likely involves the same pathway as that identified in E. coli.
The final point of investigation in the present study was the subcellular localization of native MIP. Native MIP was found to be present in both inner and outer membranes of EB and was shown to be present at the surfaces of EB by biotinylation and immunoprecipitation experiments. These results are consistent with previous reports demonstrating that at least a portion of MIP is exposed on the chlamydial surface (38, 41, 45, 55), and they suggest that the rules and mechanisms regulating MIP sorting and transport to the EB outer surface have yet to be fully characterized. The "+2 rule" for lipoprotein sorting in the E. coli cell envelope (72) cannot be applied to MIP. Indeed, the second amino acid of mature MIP, immediately after cysteine20, is aspartic acid, a residue considered to be specific for inner membrane retention (71). However, other lipoproteins have also been reported to have sorting signals different from those dictating inner or outer membrane localization in E. coli lipoproteins (50, 54, 57, 73).
One important question relating specifically to MIP cellular location is the exact function in vivo of this protein in C. trachomatis MIP. If a subset of MIP remains attached to the inner membrane, it could act as a PPIase and be involved in the folding of periplasmic or outer membrane proteins after their translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane. If MIP is located at the surfaces of EB, it might play a key role in pathogenesis and host immunity, as has been shown for other lipoproteins implicated in several important bacterial infections, including infections with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (8), Treponema pallidum (68), Listeria monocytogenes (21), Haemophilus influenzae (60), Campylobacter jejuni (32), and Borrelia burgdorferi (51). As a surface PPIase, MIP might also be involved in initiating productive chlamydial infection (40). However, the exact contribution of the PPIase activity to the functional properties of MIP is still unclear, since no bacterial or host substrates for MIP have been identified so far.
In conclusion, the present work shows that MIP is a classical lipoprotein, partly exposed at the surfaces of EB. However, as with other lipoproteins (73), the sequence of molecular events leading from inner membrane expression to exposure at the surface remains unknown, as does the nature of the MIP function. These are important issues that deserve further investigation.
We are grateful to John Pearce for supplying MAbs against MIP and S1, Ian Maclean for antibodies against hsp60, Shunichi Miyakoshi for globomycin, Olivier Dorchies for silver staining, Carine Poussin and Frédérique Lisacek for help in bioinformatics, Paul Bradfield for assistance in editing the manuscript, and Lorenza Eder-Colli, Danielle Burger, Agathe Subtil, Alice Dautry-Varsat, Gisou van der Groot, and Jacques Deshusses for helpful advice.
Published ahead of print on 20 April 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
and triggers signalling pathways leading to the activation of NF-
B and p38 MAP kinase in epithelial cells. Cell. Microbiol. 5:165-174.[CrossRef][Medline]
B by nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae is mediated by toll-like receptor 2-TAK1-dependent NIK-IKK
/ß-I
B
and MKK3/6-p38 MAP kinase signaling pathways in epithelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:8774-8779.This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»