Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, July 2007, p. 4932-4943, Vol. 189, No. 13
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00041-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Infection Microbiology Group, BioCentrum-DTU, Technical University of Denmark, Building 301, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark,1 Centre for Biomedical Microbiology, BioCentrum-DTU, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark,2 Optics and Plasma Research Department, Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark3
Received 9 January 2007/ Accepted 20 April 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The flow chamber-based model system for studying biofilm formation and dynamics has the advantage of allowing online microscopic investigations of adaptive processes involving genetic changes (23). Evolved and wild-type (wt) genotypes can be reintroduced to the biofilm environment, and biofilm formation can be investigated under strictly controlled conditions (4). Eventually, such investigations may contribute to the understanding of the adaptation dynamics of more complex structured communities. Recently, we described the occurrence of evolution in a mixed-species biofilm consortium consisting of Acinetobacter sp. strain C6 and the laboratory strain Pseudomonas putida KT2440 growing on benzyl alcohol as the sole energy and carbon source (23). In this case, the P. putida strain was unable to degrade benzyl alcohol and was therefore totally dependent on the excreted benzoate. Genetic variants of P. putida appeared reproducibly, and the cause of this divergence was found (for a set of variants) to be mutations in a single gene (PP4943) homologous to the wapH gene of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 (35). These mutants had truncated core lipopolysaccharide (LPS) with the O antigen lacking (23) and a rough colony morphology, as often observed for core LPS variants (44). The P. putida rough colony variant was better adapted to the mixed-species biofilm environment, as shown by competitive fitness assays with the P. putida wt genotype. In addition, under conditions of very low levels of cross feeding, the derived variant was able to coexist with the Acinetobacter population, in striking contrast to the P. putida wt strain.
In the present study, we further investigate the structural interactions between P. putida KT2440 cells and Acinetobacter microcolonies in flow cell biofilms. We show that the consortium environment rapidly becomes oxygen limited, possibly creating conditions of low oxygen concentrations around Acinetobacter microcolonies. We further demonstrate that the P. putida wt population detaches from the biofilm in response to an oxygen downshift, indicating a possible explanation for the lacking structural interactions. In contrast, the P. putida rough variant displays a nondispersal phenotype in the mixed-species environment and forms coaggregates with Acinetobacter. Finally, we show that the P. putida rough variant has enhanced production of a cellulose-like polymer as a consequence of the core LPS mutation.
|
|
|---|
Cultivation of biofilms.
Biofilms were grown in three-channel flow cells with individual channel dimensions of 1 by 4 by 40 mm. The flow system was assembled and prepared as described previously (8), with the modification of washing the system after sterilization with sterile milliQ water overnight. The substratum consisted of a microscope glass coverslip (st1; Knittel Gläser, Braunschweig, Germany). Each channel was supplied with a continuous flow of FAB medium containing the relevant carbon source. For propagation of mixed-species biofilm populations, flow cells were inoculated with a mixture of overnight cultures of Acinetobacter sp. strain C6 and P. putida KT2440 (wt or rough variant) diluted in a 0.9% NaCl solution. For monospecies biofilms, overnight cultures of the P. putida KT2440 wt or rough variant were used for inoculation. With arrested medium flow, the flow cells were turned upside down, and 250 µl of the diluted mixture was injected into each flow channel, using a small syringe. After 1 h, the flow cells were turned upside down, and the flow was resumed at a constant flow rate of 3.3 ml/h, using a Watson Marlow 205S peristaltic pump (Watson Marlow Inc., Wilmington, MA). After inoculation, each flow chamber contained
2 x 106 CFU of Acinetobacter and
2.5 x 105 CFU of P. putida (wt or rough variant) for mixed-species biofilms and
2.5 x 105 CFU of P. putida for monospecies biofilms. The mean flow velocity in the flow cells was 0.2 mm/s. Biofilms were grown at 24°C. When possible, Acinetobacter sp. strain C6 was visualized prior to image acquisition by staining the biofilm with a 0.1% solution of Syto62 (Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR) in FAB medium containing 500 µM benzyl alcohol. The staining was allowed to progress for 15 min without arresting the flow to avoid biofilm detachment of the P. putida strain. Using this relatively short staining time, P. putida cells were stained at a relatively low level compared to Acinetobacter cells.
Microscopy and image analysis of biofilms. All microscopic observations and image acquisitions were performed on a Zeiss LSM510 confocal laser scanning microscope (CSLM; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) equipped with an argon-krypton laser and with detectors and filter sets for monitoring green fluorescent protein (GFP) and Syto62 and for the recording of reflection (light) images. Images were obtained using a 63x/1.4 Plan-APOChromat differential interference contrast objective or a 40x/1.3 Plan-Neofluor oil objective. Multichannel simulated fluorescence projection (SFP) images, vertical xz sections through the biofilms, and simulated three-dimensional (3D) images were generated by using the IMARIS software package (Bitplane). This software was used to remove the Syto62 signal from the GFP-fluorescent P. putida cells. Images were further processed for display by using Photoshop software (Adobe, Mountain View, CA).
Biofilm images of the mixed-species consortia were obtained to quantify biomass as described previously (23), using COMSTAT software. Twelve images from three independent biofilms were analyzed for each time point.
In order to quantify the degrees to which both the P. putida rough variant and the wt associated with the Acinetobacter microcolonies, specific 3D image algorithms were developed for calculating distributions of the distances from the surfaces of the P. putida cells to the surfaces of the Acinetobacter microcolonies/cells. In order to segment the biofilms from the background, the biofilm images of both Acinetobacter and P. putida were subjected to a threshold, using the Otsus method (40). In addition, morphological filtering (the so-called AreaOpen operation) was used to eliminate small colonies of background noise and interference noise between the channels. Additional image layers were then introduced by bilinear interpolation in order to obtain a voxel size with equidistant edges. Next, a 3D distance map defining the nearest distance from any voxel in the considered 3D mesh to the surfaces of P. putida cells was calculated by use of a previously described 3D Euclidean distance transform (60). The distance values belonging to voxels overlapping with the surface regions of the Acinetobacter biofilm were then collected to produce the distribution of distances between strains. A minimum of eight images from two independent biofilms were analyzed for each time point.
Oxygen upshift and downshift experiments. A method was developed to control the oxygen concentration in the inflowing biofilm medium. Due to the high oxygen permeability of the silicone tubing feeding the flow channel, it was possible to control the oxygen concentration in the inflowing medium. This was done by passing the medium through 5 m of silicone tubing submerged in a water container purged with either nitrogen gas (99.8% N2; Hede Nielsen, Denmark) or oxygen gas (99.5%; Hede Nielsen, Denmark) prior to its entering the flow channel. Oxygen concentrations were measured using a microelectrode with a 0.5-mm tip (Unisense OX500) connected to an ampere meter with a built-in polarization source (Unisense PA2000). Before every set of measurements, a calibration curve was obtained by determining the value at zero oxygen (water vigorously purged with nitrogen gas) and the value for water saturated with air (which corresponds to approximately 250 µM oxygen at 24°C and 0.9% NaCl [18]).
Oxygen downshift experiments (one step down) were performed on 2-day-old biofilms consisting of mixed-species Acinetobacter and P. putida populations or a monospecies P. putida population grown as described above. To monitor downshift experiments online using scanning confocal microscopy, the flow cell was connected to the submerged silicone tubing by a glass tube to prevent influx of oxygen. The biofilm populations were fed with air-saturated biofilm medium until the desired time point for the downshift, shifted to the oxygen-stripped medium at time zero, and subsequently followed over time. In order to efficiently strip the oxygen from the biofilm medium, the silicone tubing had been submerged in N2-purged water additionally containing the reductant sodium ascorbate (0.1 M).
Oxygen upshift experiments were performed as described for the downshift experiments except that the water tank was purged with O2 gas, which resulted in an oxygen concentration of around 1 mM in the medium inflow.
Stepwise downshift experiments were performed on P. putida monospecies biofilms formed by the wt or the rough variant, propagated as described above. After inoculation, the silicone tubing, including the flow cells, was submerged and secured in a 15-liter water-filled tank. The oxygen concentration in the inflow medium was monitored by measuring the concentration of oxygen in the water container, which in turn was controlled by the purging rate of nitrogen gas (control experiments had shown a <2% difference in the concentrations in the inflow medium and the water surrounding the silicone tubing, which was mainly due to a difference in the saline concentration). The oxygen concentration in the water was adjusted to obtain an oxygen concentration of approximately 125 µM (50% of the normal level). After 18 h of incubation, the concentration was reduced to approximately 100 µM (40%), and after 24 h, it was reduced to approximately 75 µM (30%). After 32 h, the oxygen concentration was reduced to 35 µM (14%) and, finally, to near zero levels (<3 µM). During the experiment, the flow cells were briefly removed from the water tank for microscopic observations and image acquisition (brief upshifts had no significant effect on the biofilms).
Phenotypic characterization of the P. putida rough variant. Swimming motility and chemotaxis (42) towards benzoate were investigated using 0.28% agar plates with AB medium supplemented with 1 mM benzoate (Sigma). Single colonies were inoculated, and plates were incubated for 24 h at 30°C.
P. putida wt and rough variant strains were investigated for pellicle formation in static broth cultures. A 100-ml Erlenmeyer flask containing 50 ml AB minimal medium supplemented with 40 mM glucose was inoculated with 1 ml overnight culture. Cultures were incubated without shaking at 30°C, and pellicle formation was observed after 2 days. The pellicle polysaccharide was stained with calcofluor white (Sigma) as described previously (36), except that the buffer (10 mM Tris buffer, pH 8, 0.9% NaCl) contained 1 µg/ml calcofluor white. The polysaccharide was examined using an Axioplan epifluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss) with a 100x oil objective. The microscope was equipped with a 100-W mercury lamp and a DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole) filter. To confirm the presence of a cellulose-like polymer in the rough variant pellicle biofilm, pellicle material from static cultures was treated with cellulase (from Aspergillus niger; ICN Biomedicals Inc.) as described previously (51), with the addition of 5 µg/ml chloramphenicol to stop bacterial protein synthesis. Disintegration of pellicles was determined by visual inspection. Extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) formation in P. putida wt and variant colonies was examined on fresh LB agar plates with 25 µg/ml calcofluor white. Plates were incubated at 30°C for 5 days. The binding of calcofluor white to agar plate colonies was determined by fluorescence excitation with a 254-nm light source and photographed using a Canon digital camera.
Coaggregation of Acinetobacter and P. putida cells (GFP-tagged wt and rough variant cells) was investigated by mixing cells from stationary-phase cultures. The cell density (optical density at 600 nm) was adjusted to 1.5, and cells were subsequently mixed at a ratio of 1:1 in a total volume of 1 ml. Aggregation was allowed to proceed for 3 h before inspection. For microscopic visualization, cells were stained with 0.2% Syto62 for 30 min, and images were obtained using an LSM510 microscope as described above. Cellulase assays on coaggregated clumps were performed as described above for the rough variant pellicle biofilm material.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (119K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Structural relationships and development of wt and evolved consortium biofilms. Biofilms of Acinetobacter sp. strain C6 and P. putida wt (A to C) or a P. putida rough variant (D to F) were grown in flow chambers supplemented with 500 µM benzyl alcohol as the sole carbon source. P. putida cells (green) had a gfp expression cassette inserted into the chromosome. Acinetobacter sp. strain C6 cells (red) were visualized using Syto62. CSLM micrographs were obtained for biofilms grown for 1 day (A and D) and 3 days (B, C, E, and F). The main frames (A to E) are horizontal shadow projection (SFP) images, and side panels are xz sections in the positions indicated with white arrows. The main frame in panel F is a single image slide from the image shown in panel E showing a high association between microcolonies of Acinetobacter and the P. putida rough variant. Biomass (µm3/µm2) distributions were determined on day 1 (G) and day 3 (H) by image quantification of biofilms consisting of the wt consortium (P. putida wt and Acinetobacter) and the variant consortium (P. putida rough variant and Acinetobacter), respectively. (Day 3 data were reproduced from Nature [23] with permission of the publisher.) Red, biomass of the Acinetobacter population; green, biomass of the P. putida population. Values are means ± standard deviations. (I) The structural association between P. putida and Acinetobacter was quantified by image analysis of the mixed-species biofilms (see Materials and Methods for details). The average distances from the surfaces of Acinetobacter microcolonies to the nearest P. putida cells were determined for the wt consortium and the rough variant consortium on day 1 (white bars) and on day 3 (gray bars). Values are means ± standard deviations.
|
![]() View larger version (92K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Gradients in growth activity of P. putida cells at the bottom edge of large Acinetobacter sp. strain C6 microcolonies. To visualize in situ growth activity, the P. putida wt strain had a mini-Tn7-Gmr-rrnBP1-gfp[AAV] cassette inserted into the chromosome. Mixed-species biofilms of Acinetobacter and P. putida were grown in flow chambers for 36 h. (A) Image of GFP fluorescence of P. putida cells (substratum layer) obtained using CSLM. The gradient in fluorescence intensity (bottom) was quantified along the line indicated with the white arrow. (B) Light reflection image captured in the same viewing field, showing both P. putida and Acinetobacter cells. The typical cell morphology of Acinetobacter is coccoid, and that of P. putida is rod-shaped, but the nonfluorescent rod-shaped cells in panel B are stressed or undivided cells of Acinetobacter, which are frequently seen for this strain when it is proliferated on a surface. The arrow in panel B shows the direction of flow.
|
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Oxygen upshift causes increased growth activity of P. putida wt cells grown in mixed biofilms with Acinetobacter sp. strain C6 cells. P. putida wt cells containing a mini-Tn7-Gmr-rrnBP1-gfp[AAV] cassette were grown in flow cells containing Acinetobacter. On day 2, the oxygen concentration in the inflowing medium was increased approximately fourfold, as described in Materials and Methods. CSLM micrographs of the GFP fluorescence were captured in the same viewing field before (A) and 30 min (B) and 60 min (C) after the oxygen upshift. Increased growth activity was observed in three independent experiments. Images were recorded as single horizontal scans. The gradient in fluorescence intensity shown below each image was quantified along the line indicated with the arrow, using LSM510 CSLM software. Acinetobacter cells are not visible.
|
![]() View larger version (71K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Different biofilm dispersal phenotypes of P. putida wt and the rough variant in response to oxygen downshift. Acinetobacter cells were proliferated in flow chambers with GFP-tagged cells of P. putida wt and the rough variant. On day 2, an oxygen downshift was performed online as described in Materials and Methods. CSLM micrographs of the P. putida wt biofilm were captured in the same viewing field before (A) and 5 min (B), 9 min (C), and 25 min (D) after the oxygen downshift. CSLM micrographs of the P. putida rough variant biofilm were likewise captured in the same viewing field before (E) and 25 min after (F) the oxygen downshift. CSLM micrographs are presented as simulated three-dimensional images. Acinetobacter cells are not visible.
|
![]() View larger version (124K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Structures and phenotypes of P. putida wt and rough variant monospecies biofilms during a stepwise oxygen downshift. Biofilms were proliferated in flow chambers supplemented with benzoate as the sole carbon source. Green fluorescence from GFP-tagged P. putida cells was recorded using CSLM imaging. Monospecies biofilms of P. putida wt (A) and the rough variant (B) displayed a similar structure (day 2) when biofilms were proliferated with standard oxygen concentrations (approximately 250 µM in the inflowing medium). A graduated (stepwise) oxygen downshift was performed on monospecies biofilms as described in Materials and Methods. After 32 h, the inflowing medium contained approximately 75 µM oxygen, resulting in a very flat and thin biofilm of the P. putida wt population (C), in contrast to the thick microcolonies observed for the rough variant (D). After 48 h and prolonged starvation (down to <3 µM oxygen), both P. putida wt (E) and the rough variant (F) showed significant dispersal of the biofilm. The main frames are horizontal shadow projection (SFP) images, and side panels are xz sections in the positions indicated with white arrows.
|
These data show that the low-oxygen-persistence physiology of the rough variant is not expressed under all conditions. Since the rough variants evolved specifically in the presence of Acinetobacter sp. strain C6, we investigated if the sole presence of Acinetobacter cells in the flow chamber with the rough variant would cause the nondispersal, low-oxygen-persistence phenotype of the variant independent of the nutrient conditions. This was done by proliferating populations of the rough variant and Acinetobacter in the flow chamber on benzoate instead of benzyl alcohol. Flow chambers were supplied with standard air-saturated medium inflow. In this scenario, both strains were competing for the primary carbon source, and hence there was no apparent advantage for the rough variant to associate with Acinetobacter sp. strain C6. Not surprisingly, a large part of the rough variant population was found dissociated from the Acinetobacter microcolonies, and this part dispersed after the oxygen downshift, as observed for the P. putida wt population (data not shown). However, the part that was found associated with Acinetobacter microcolonies showed the characteristic nondispersal phenotype, indicating that proliferation associated with Acinetobacter microcolonies may change the rough variant phenotype.
Coaggregate formation. The P. putida rough variant lacks the LPS O antigen as a consequence of the wapH mutation, which is very likely to change the physiochemical characteristics of the cell surface (47). This led us to investigate if the mutation had caused a change in surface compatibility between the rough variant and Acinetobacter cells, leading to increased coadhesion. Stationary-phase cultures were mixed at a ratio of 1:1 and allowed to aggregate for 3 h. At this time, coaggregation of Acinetobacter and P. putida rough variant cells formed large visible clumps in the mixture (Fig. 6A), whereas no significant clumping was observed for the mixture of Acinetobacter and P. putida wt (Fig. 6B). Rough variant cells grown on FAB minimal medium containing benzoate coaggregated into visual clumps with Acinetobacter cells grown in FAB medium containing benzyl alcohol; however, larger clumps formed at a higher rate when the rough variant was mixed with Acinetobacter cells grown in LB medium.
![]() View larger version (46K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Coaggregation with Acinetobacter, biofilm pellicle formation, and polysaccharide formation observed for the P. putida rough variant are caused by the wapH mutation. (A and B) A stationary-phase cell culture of P. putida (green) grown on FAB medium with 5 mM benzoate was mixed with a stationary-phase cell culture of Acinetobacter sp. strain C6 (red) grown on LB. CSLM micrographs were obtained of coaggregates of Acinetobacter and P. putida rough variant cells (A) or Acinetobacter and P. putida wt cells (B) after 3 h of incubation. (C and D) Rough variant biofilm pellicles were transferred to a petri dish and incubated at 37°C overnight in the presence (C) and absence (D) of cellulase enzyme (from Aspergillus niger), as described in Materials and Methods. Dissolution was observed only after incubation with the cellulase enzyme. (E) Polysaccharide fibers of condensed biofilm pellicle material stained with calcofluor white. (F) Colonies of P. putida with a constructed mutation in the wapH gene (SNZ83) (top left), P. putida KT2440 wt (top right), and P. putida (SNZ83) complemented with a plasmid containing the wapH gene (bottom right) were grown on LB agar containing 25 µg/ml calcofluor white for 5 days.
|
In order to investigate the role of cellulose production in stabilizing the coaggregates of Acinetobacter and P. putida rough variant cells, aggregates were treated with cellulase as described for the pellicle biofilm (see above). However, no signs of dissolution were observed after overnight incubation (data not shown). Attempts to dissolve the mixed-species biofilm of Acinetobacter and the P. putida rough variant with cellulase treatment also failed (data not shown).
|
|
|---|
One possible explanation for the observed phenotypic differences could be a change in chemotactic behavior, given that P. putida is chemotactic towards benzoate, the cross-fed substrate (24, 25). Chemotaxis and motility have been shown to be very important for biofilm structure and coordination in surface populations (28, 29, 39). Our own investigations have documented that both P. putida wt and rough variant cells are motile and show a positive chemotactic response to increasing concentrations of benzoate (data not shown). Despite a small reduction in swimming speed of the rough variant, the differences in motility behavior cannot explain the observed difference in structural association in the mixed-species biofilms.
The P. putida wt population was unable to establish a tight association with the Acinetobacter microcolonies, and furthermore, a decline in population size was observed over time. The underlying theory behind this failure involves the oxygen starvation response. It is hypothesized that as they are confronted with reductions in oxygen levels, P. putida cells respond by leaving the biofilm rather than taking up competition for oxygen. The exact molecular basis for biofilm dispersal in P. putida KT2440 is unknown, but in P. putida OUS82, proteins containing the GGDEF and EAL domains have been shown to be involved in biofilm formation and dispersal (21). The biofilm dispersal mechanism was observed for P. putida wt biofilms in response to both a rapid and a more gradual oxygen downshift. The findings that the P. putida wt biomass decreased from day 1 to day 3, that the total oxygen consumption reached almost exhaustive levels within 1 to 2 days, that the growth activity of wt P. putida decreased first locally around large Acinetobacter microcolonies (Fig. 2) and then globally within 2 days, and that the growth rate-limiting nutrient at this point was in fact oxygen are all in accordance with our hypothesis. Benzoate limitation was unlikely to be the cause of the local growth activity decrease observed, because previous investigations have shown that benzoate is continuously leaking from the large microcolonies (37) and accumulating in the effluent medium (7) under similar conditions. Upshifting the oxygen concentration increased the growth activity of P. putida cells, showing that there was no lack of carbon source under the prevailing conditions (Fig. 3). Also, we found that benzoate was not toxic to P. putida at relevant concentrations (data not shown). Since the P. putida wt population disperses in response to oxygen starvation, a niche is open to any new variant that would be able to overcome this problem.
A complete change in dispersal response was observed for the P. putida rough variant: when mixed-species biofilms of the rough variant and Acinetobacter sp. strain C6 were exposed to low-oxygen conditions, no dispersal of the variant population was observed. Explaining the lack of an oxygen starvation response of the rough variant genotype in the mixed-species biofilms is complicated by the finding that these cells in fact do possess the normal biofilm dispersal response if confronted with a sudden depletion of oxygen in the absence of Acinetobacter, so the rough variant is not merely a biofilm dispersal mutant. In addition to the normal dispersal response observed for P. putida rough variant monospecies biofilms was the finding of loose and flexible biofilm structures similar to those observed for the wt. Hence, the rough variant flow chamber population displayed behavioral and structural similarity with the wt population in the absence of Acinetobacter cells, in support of our previous results (23) showing that rough variants did not evolve in monospecies biofilms of P. putida wt and that the rough variants did not have any fitness advantage relative to the ancestral P. putida cells in this environment.
One of the real challenges in this investigation was to explain how a single mutation resulting in a changed LPS phenotype gives rise to the observed conditional nondispersal phenotype. We therefore investigated various factors in the mixed-species biofilm environment in an attempt to resolve the specific conditions leading to the characteristic conditional phenotype of the P. putida rough variant. As discussed above, it was clear that the presence of the Acinetobacter population in the biofilm was needed for the nondispersal phenotype to occur. One effect of the Acinetobacter population in the mixed-species biofilms was a gradual reduction in oxygen concentration due to extensive oxygen consumption from metabolizing the carbon source, benzyl alcohol. However, reduced oxygen conditions alone did not produce the complete nondispersal phenotype, as a gradual reduction in the externally applied oxygen concentration resulted in a transiently thicker monospecies biofilm of the rough variant compared to that of the wt, and prolonged starvation caused both strains to disperse significantly.
The lack of the O antigen in the rough variant is very likely to change the physiochemical characteristics of the cell surface (47), which could have a direct effect on the cell-to-cell interaction with Acinetobacter cells by changing the surface compatibility. It was previously shown that core or rough LPS variant derivatives of P. aeruginosa were more hydrophobic and showed changed biofilm-forming properties (16, 47). Experiments with batch cultures revealed that cells of Acinetobacter and the P. putida rough variant, but not wt P. putida, form extensive coaggregates when mixed together. The mechanism of coadherence is unknown, but this feature seems to be a key factor in understanding the conditional behavior of the rough variant: it is able to stick firmly and specifically to the Acinetobacter microcolonies or cells in the mixed-species biofilms and thereby ensure close access to the excreted benzoate. In this way, the Acinetobacter population may function as an anchor point for the rough variant, an opportunity not present in monospecies biofilms. However, just serving as an anchor point was not sufficient for the Acinetobacter population to cause the complete nondispersal phenotype of the rough variant population. This was demonstrated by propagating the mixed-species rough variant biofilm on a different nutrient source, i.e., benzoate, instead of benzyl alcohol. The part of the rough variant population that was found associated with Acinetobacter microcolonies when propagated on benzoate showed the characteristic nondispersal phenotype. However, other niches contained rough variant microcolonies with a phenotype similar to that of the wt; these microcolonies would detach when the oxygen concentration was shifted down. This suggests that proliferating in the environment in tight association with Acinetobacter microcolonies could change the rough variant physiology, although this was neither advantageous nor necessary under conditions where both strains were able to degrade the primary carbon source, benzoate.
We have previously shown that the rough variant has a parasitic or negative effect on the Acinetobacter population when they proliferate together in mixed-species biofilms (23). The results from this work point to intense oxygen competition in the biofilm environment, which offers a plausible explanation for the parasitic effect, as follows: the rough variant grows as a mantle on the Acinetobacter microcolonies (Fig. 1) and therefore acts as a living shield by preventing Acinetobacter cells from efficiently reaching the important nutrient oxygen. In the wt situation, the P. putida population responds by leaving when competition for oxygen becomes too intense.
We have shown that both benzyl alcohol and the Acinetobacter population are necessary but that neither one is sufficient for the complete nondispersal phenotype of the rough variant to occur. Acinetobacter cells may serve as an attachment point for the P. putida rough variant cells, but other adherence factors or matrix components seem to be needed to stabilize the variant biofilm, as not all variant cells can be attached directly to the Acinetobacter cells. It is very likely that growing in the stressful environment of the Acinetobacter microcolonies may induce the rough variant population to produce some extracellular polymeric substances. Some of the stress factors could be the very low concentration of oxygen, surface contact with Acinetobacter cells, or the generally poor nutrient environment. It is highly possible that the cellulose-like polymer that has been observed in the rough variant could be induced in the mixed-species biofilm and may be responsible, to some degree, for the nondispersal phenotype. However, it is clear that the cellulose-like polymer was not the only factor causing the nondispersal biofilm phenotype, as cellulase enzyme treatment of mixed-species biofilms with Acinetobacter did not disintegrate the biofilm.
Evidence of enhanced formation of a cellulose-like polymer in the rough variant was found on agar plates and in standing broth cultures producing a biofilm pellicle that could be disintegrated by cellulase enzyme treatment. Sequence analysis has revealed a cellulose operon in the P. putida genome (15, 38), and the EPS material could therefore be cellulose. In agreement with our results, no pellicle formation was observed for P. putida KT2440 wt in standing cultures of KB medium, but interestingly, the cellulose machinery was demonstrated to be intact and functioning (55). Additionally, cellulose production seems to be fairly common among bacteria and pseudomonads in relation to biofilm formation (55). The enhanced production of the cellulose-like polymer was shown to be the result of one mutation in wapH, a gene involved in core LPS production. The link between the mutation and the enhanced EPS production in P. putida is not clear, but a similar phenotype was found for the root-colonizing bacterium Azospirillum brasilense. In this case, a deletion causing a modification in the LPS core structure resulted in enhanced production of a calcofluor white-stainable polysaccharide (27). Deep rough LPS variant phenotypes of Escherichia coli have been shown to overproduce colanic acid EPS. These mutants are unable to cross-link the LPS core part (43), but the homologous genes involved in inner core LPS formation in P. aeruginosa were shown to be essential (56).
Our investigations show that biofilms may readily develop into very complex and heterogeneous environments, with structural niches, microenvironments, and gradients of nutrients, a finding that is consistent with the prevailing view of the biofilm environment (2). Nutrient (or oxygen) starvation causes subpopulation stress (3). The rapid and repeated emergence of rough colony variants is the result of natural selection (23) in response to the physical/chemical environment afforded by the presence of benzyl alcohol-degrading Acinetobacter cells; the shortcomings of the wt genotype are quickly overcome by adaptive mutations. The present results confirm our previous suggestion (23) that the rough variant phenotype is adapted to the very specific environment from which it was derived, and there is no reason to assume that the mutation has any selective advantage under other environmental conditions. The specific adaptation could be caused by one single mutation in wapH altering entirely the interspecies interaction, biofilm structure, and phenotype, causing coaggregation and polysaccharide formation.
Published ahead of print on 27 April 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»