Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, August 2007, p. 5550-5558, Vol. 189, No. 15
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00471-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Olga Lomovskaya,3 and
Helen I. Zgurskaya1*
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019,1 Microcide Pharmaceuticals, Mountain View, California,2 Mpex Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, California 921093
Received 28 March 2007/ Accepted 11 May 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
RND-type multidrug transporters from various species share a high degree of sequence and, correspondingly, structure conservation. Structural and functional studies showed that RND-type transporters exist as trimers, which are organized into two large domains: the transmembrane hydrophobic domain comprised by 36 transmembrane
-helices (TMS) with each protomer contributing 12 TMSs and the large periplasmic domain exposed to aqueous environment of the periplasm (17). This impressive structure, however, is not sufficient to provide multidrug resistance. RND transporters associate with two accessory proteins. The periplasmic membrane fusion proteins (MFPs) are believed to mediate the interaction between an RND transporter and an outer membrane channel belonging to the outer membrane factor family of proteins (18, 27). Together, these interacting three components span the inner and outer membranes and the periplasm of gram-negative bacteria. Mutations in any of the three proteins completely abolish intrinsic multidrug resistance of gram-negative bacteria.
In the three-component complexes, RND transporters are responsible for drug recognition. Crystallization studies of AcrB from Escherichia coli (AcrBEC) revealed several possible drug-interacting sites (16, 25, 26). In the first report, several unrelated drugs were detected in the central cavity formed by three protomers of AcrBEC on the interface between periplasm and the inner membrane (26). Two other sites are located in the periplasmic domains: one is in a prominent cleft on the surface of the periplasmic domain (25); another is deep inside this domain (16). These periplasmic drug binding sites were largely delineated by mutagenesis studies of RND-type transporters from various gram-negative bacteria even before the crystal structures became available (5, 10, 12, 23). Consistent with a high degree of sequence conservation, positions affecting substrate specificity are conserved among various RND transporters. Furthermore, recombinant RND-type multidrug transporters from various gram-negative bacteria are functional when expressed in E. coli (23).
Haemophilus influenzae is a gram-negative pathogen causing respiratory diseases in humans and animals. Genetic and sequence studies showed that H. influenzae constitutively produces a homolog of AcrBEC (19). Similar to other RND transporters, H. influenzae AcrB (AcrBHI) associates with AcrAHI, the periplasmic MFP, and the outer membrane channel TolCHI (24). Inactivation of any of the three proteins AcrAHI, AcrBHI, or TolCHI increased the susceptibility of H. influenzae to 16 antimicrobial compounds. In all cases, the susceptibility profiles of AcrAHI, AcrBHI, or TolCHI null mutants were identical, suggesting that these proteins are components of a single pump. Mutations in other RND transporters identified by sequences searches of H. influenzae genome did not affect drug susceptibility (24). Therefore, AcrABHI-TolCHI is a major, constitutively expressed multidrug efflux complex of H. influenzae and a potent target for the development of specific inhibitors of this transporter.
The substrate specificities of AcrABEC-TolCEC and AcrABHI-TolCHI are very similar and include both positively charged (dyes and erythromycin) and negatively charged (novobiocin) compounds (19, 24). In contrast to E. coli, AcrABHI-TolCHI does not protect H. influenzae from ß-lactams, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, or fluoroquinolones. It is presently unclear whether this reflects differences in substrate specificities of two transporters or differences in the permeability properties of their outer membranes.
In this study, we found that AcrABHI confers multidrug resistance when expressed in E. coli cells and requires for its activity TolCEC protein. We next used the ease of the protein overproduction in E. coli to investigate the intracellular dynamics of AcrABHI in the presence of various substrates and to gain insight into the possible role of the accessory proteins in multidrug recognition. For this purpose, single cysteine mutations were constructed in AcrABHI in positions previously identified in Pseudomonas aeruginosa MexD as important for substrate recognition (10). The accessibility of these strategically positioned cysteines to the hydrophilic thiol-reactive fluorophore fluorescein-5-maleimide (FM) was studied in vivo in the presence of various substrates of AcrABHI and in the presence or absence of AcrAHI and TolCEC. We found that the reactivity of specific cysteines with FM was affected by the presence of some but not all substrates. Both protection and increased susceptibility of cysteines to FM were observed. Our results suggest that substrates induce conformational changes in AcrBHI.
|
|
|---|
To identify the positions of amino acids for mutagenesis, we performed the multiple alignment analysis using the ClustalW program as a part of the InfoMax package (Invitrogen). Twenty-one sequences of RND transporters including AcrBEC and AcrDEC and MexB, MexD, MexF, MexY, and MexK from P. aeruginosa were aligned with AcrBHI. Positions known to affect the substrate specificity of MexD and MexB were selected for mutagenesis of AcrBHI (Table 1). Site-specific mutagenesis was carried out with a QuickChange kit (Invitrogen) using pRAB as a template. DNA primers were designed according to the manufacturers' instructions. All mutations were verified by sequencing of the resulting plasmids.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. AcrBHI-Cys variants and the corresponding amino acid residues in AcrBEC and mutations in P. aeruginosa MexD
|
Strains and growth conditions.
The E. coli DH5
strain was used for all cloning purposes. The expression, FM labeling, and MIC determination were carried out in either the AG100AX strain [argE3 thi-1 rpsL xyl mtl galK supE441
(gal-uvrB)
acrAB::kan
acrEF::spe) (14) or ECM1694 (MC4100
acrAB::kan). ECM2112 (MC4100
acrAB::kan
tolC::Tn10) was used to study the effect of TolCEC. Cells were grown at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth containing 10 g of Bacto tryptone, 10 g of Bacto yeast extract, and 5 g of NaCl per liter. The antibiotics ampicillin (100 µg/ml), kanamycin (34 µg/ml), spectinomycin (50 µg/ml), and tetracycline (25 µg/ml) were used as selection markers.
MICs.
MICs of various antimicrobial agents were measured using the microdilution technique in 96-well microtiter plates. For this purpose, exponentially growing cultures (A600 of
1.0 as determined using a Shimadzu UV-1601 spectrophotometer) were inoculated at a density of 104 cells per ml into LB medium in the presence of twofold-increasing concentrations of the drug under investigation. Cell growth was determined visually after overnight incubation at 37°C.
Protein analyses.
Membrane fractions of various strains were analyzed to determine the expression of AcrBHI and AcrAHI. For this purpose, cells were grown in 10 ml of LB broth supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/ml), and at an A600 of
0.6, cells were induced with 0.1 mM IPTG for 2 h. Cells were pelleted and resuspended in 1 ml of buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Cells were lysed by sonication, and unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation at 3,220 x g for 15 min. Membranes were collected by centrifugation at 250,000 x g for 60 min. Membrane fractions were solubilized in 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer at room temperature and subjected to 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). For analysis of Cys-containing AcrBHI (AcrBHI-Cys), nonreducing SDS-PAGE was used, where boiling and the addition of ß-mercaptoethanol were omitted from the sample preparation. The levels of expression of AcrAHI and AcrBHI were monitored by Western immunoblotting analysis using polyclonal anti-AcrA antibody and HisProbe-HRP (SuperSignal West HisProbe kit; Pierce), a nickel-activated derivative of horseradish peroxidase, respectively. The alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibody and the chromogenic reaction with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate-nitroblue tetrazolium substrates were used to visualize AcrAHI protein bands.
Whole-cell labeling with FM and mini-protein purification.
The His6-tagged AcrBHI Cys-less and Cys mutants were purified from E. coli cells carrying the corresponding plasmids. For this purpose, cells were grown in 200 ml of LB medium supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/ml) to an A600 of
0.6. The expression of AcrBHI was induced by 0.1 mM IPTG for 1 h 45 min. Cells were harvested and washed once with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.0. To determine accessibility of AcrBHI-Cys to FM, cells were resuspended in 1 ml of PBS buffer containing 300 µM FM (Invitrogen-Molecular Probes). To study the effect of substrates on accessibility of AcrBHI-Cys to FM, we adapted the protocol previously described for the MdfA transporter (1). Briefly, prior to the addition of FM, cells (120 optical density units at 600 nm in 1 ml of PBS) were preincubated with substrates (erythromycin, novobiocin, cloxacillin, ethidium bromide, Triton X-100, or inhibitor MC-207,110) in final concentrations of 5 mM (1). After incubation with FM for 30 min at room temperature, the reactions were stopped by the addition of dithiothreitol to a final concentration of 10 mM. Cells were pelleted in a microcentrifuge and resuspended in 2 ml of buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, and 0.1 mg/ml lysozyme. Cells were broken by sonication, the unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation at 3,220 x g for 15 min, and the supernatant was further centrifuged at 250,000 x g for 60 min. The pellet was resuspended in 0.5 ml of binding buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 500 mM NaCl, and 5 mM imidazole (buffer A); then an equal volume of 10% Triton X-100 in buffer A was slowly added to solubilize membrane proteins. After overnight incubation at 4°C, insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 250,000 x g for 30 min. Supernatants were loaded onto 0.1-ml His-bind resin (Novagen) mini-columns charged with Cu2+ and equilibrated with buffer A containing 0.2% Triton X-100 (buffer B). The column was washed with buffer B, and then bound proteins were eluted with a step gradient of imidazole (5 mM, 50 mM, and 500 mM) in buffer B. The majority of AcrBHI was eluted with 500 mM imidazole. Purified AcrBHI and its variants were separated by 8% SDS-PAGE. A Storm 840 phosphor and fluorescent screen imaging system (Amersham Pharmacia-Molecular Dynamics) was used to assess fluorescein labeling of cysteine mutants. Next, gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) to visualize protein bands and determine amounts of proteins. Fluorescence intensity and protein amount were analyzed using the ImageQuant TL program (Amersham Pharmacia). For each protein band, the fluorescence intensity was normalized on the protein amount determined from the same gel after staining with CBB.
|
|
|---|
acrAB::kan), cells gained high levels of resistance to multiple antibiotics (Table 2). The increase in MICs was observed even in the absence of IPTG, indicating that both AcrAHI and AcrBHI are expressed as a result of the promoter leakage. Western immunoblotting confirmed that AcrBHI is expressed in E. coli and that the addition of IPTG induced severalfold overproduction of this protein (data not shown). The activity of AcrABHI was completely abolished in the ECM2112 (
acrAB
tolC) strain. Thus, similar to other recombinant RND transporters produced in E. coli, the function of AcrABHI in E. coli required the outer membrane channel TolCEC. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility of the E. coli ECM1694 ( acrAB) strain carrying plasmid pRAB with AcrABHI and its variants
|
Single cysteine mutants of AcrBHI are functional. To investigate the intracellular dynamics of AcrBHI, we introduced unique cysteine residues into the putative substrate binding sites of AcrBHI (AcrBHI-Cys). Previously, Mao et al. (10) identified several spontaneous mutations in P. aeruginosa MexD that altered the substrate specificity of this transporter. MexD and AcrBHI share 29% identity and 53% homology with each other. We reasoned that the overall topology of substrate binding sites is conserved in RND transporters. Using sequence alignment and structure analysis, we identified the amino acid residues located in the sites of AcrBHI similar to the sites of MexD (Table 1). Prior to mutagenesis, a single cysteine residue, C932, of the native AcrBHI was replaced with serine [AcrBHI(C932S)]. Western immunoblotting analysis showed that AcrBHI(C932S) is expressed to the level comparable to that of the wild-type AcrBHI (data not shown). As judged by MIC measurements, this cysteineless AcrBHI was functional although MICs were two- to fourfold lower for all tested substrates (Table 2).
We next introduced nine unique cysteine residues into AcrBHI(C932S) (Fig. 1C and Table 1). Three mutations L396C, I397C, and G401C are located in the TMS4, which is proposed to be the major route for the proton translocation (17). The E42C substitution is exposed to the central cavity of AcrBHI, the site of substrate binding to AcrBEC identified in one of the structural studies (26). Substitutions T96C, A288C, and L324C are located in the major depression of the periplasmic domain, which was recently implicated in substrate binding (16). Finally, I601C and Q658C are located in the external cleft of the periplasmic domain and in proximity to the putative interaction site with the periplasmic AcrAHI (17, 25). All AcrBHI-Cys mutants were expressed at about the same level and retained their functionality (Fig. 1A and Table 2). However, AcrBHI(Q658C) provided only partial levels of resistance to erythromycin and ethidium bromide and lost activity against chloramphenicol (Table 2). The AcrBHI carrying E42C and L324C mutations was only partially active against ethidium bromide and erythromycin, respectively. All Cys mutations with the exception of E42C failed to confer resistance against tetracycline and displayed only a twofold increase in resistance against norfloxacin.
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Expression and accessibility to FM of AcrBHI and its variants. (A) Western immunoblotting of membrane fractions (15 µg of total protein per lane) isolated from cells carrying pRAB plasmids with the indicated AcrBHI mutants. AcrAHI was visualized using rabbit anti-AcrA antibody, and AcrBHI was visualized with a nickel-activated derivative of horseradish peroxidase. (B) Accessibility of AcrBHI-Cys to FM. Whole cells containing the indicated AcrBHI variants were incubated with 0.3 mM FM for 30 min at 37°C (see Materials and Methods). Purified AcrBHI variants were separated by 8% SDS-PAGE and visualized by fluorescence using a Storm Imager (FM). After fluorescence scanning protein bands were visualized by CBB (C) staining. (C) Schematic representation of AcrBHI and positions of introduced cysteine residues based on the structure of AcrBEC (17). HIAcrA, AcrAHI; HIAcrB, AcrBHI.
|
To investigate whether the constructed cysteine residues of AcrBHI are accessible from the aqueous environment of the periplasm, whole E. coli cells expressing various AcrBHI-Cys mutants were treated with the hydrophilic, thiol-reactive fluorophore FM. The reaction was terminated by the addition of dithiothreitol, and AcrBHI-Cys variants were purified from membrane fractions and analyzed as described in Materials and Methods.
Figure 1B shows that no fluorescent signal was detected in the cysteineless AcrBHI(C932S) and mutants with Cys residues L396C, I397C, and G401C located in TMS4. However, Cys residues located in the periplasmic loops were accessible to FM, albeit to different degrees. As expected, I601C and Q658C exposed to the outer cleft of the periplasmic domain of AcrBHI were the most readily reacting with FM. The A288C mutation was the least accessible to FM (
10 to 30% of Q658C reactivity). In the crystal structure of the homologous AcrBEC, this A288C residue is located deep in the periplasmic drug binding pocket. The E42C, T96C, and L324C residues were partially reactive, with
30 to 50% of accessibility compared to Q658C. In the AcrBEC structure, E42C is accessible from the central cavity formed by three AcrBHI protomers, and T96C and L324C lie in the periplasmic domain (16).
All cysteines are less accessible to FM in TolCEC- and AcrAHI-deficient E. coli. For its function in E. coli AcrABHI requires the outer membrane channel TolCEC. Therefore, we next investigated the accessibility of AcrBHI-Cys mutants to FM in the E. coli strain lacking the chromosomal TolCEC. Consistent with previous observations (6), the high levels of AcrABHI expression were toxic to the tolCEC strain. The levels of AcrABHI mutants varied significantly, and expression was often completely lost after storage of the transformed strains at 80°C. Therefore, for these experiments we used only freshly transformed cells. Surprisingly, although the overall pattern of AcrBHI-Cys accessibility to FM remained the same, the reactivity of all mutants was substantially lower in the tolCEC mutant compared to the wild type (Fig. 2). This result suggested that either the lack of TolCEC dramatically changed the AcrBHI conformation or, more likely, that the outer membrane of the tolCEC mutant is less permeable to FM.
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. FM accessibility of Cys residues in the periplasmic loops of AcrBHI-Cys is reduced in the absence of TolCEC. (A) AcrABHI variants were produced in E. coli strains AG100AX ( acrAB acrEF) and ECM2112 ( acrAB tolC) and analyzed for FM accessibility as described in the legend of Fig. 1 and in Materials and Methods. (B) Fluorescence intensities of AcrBHI-Cys variants (counts) shown in panel A are normalized based on the amount (amt) of AcrBHI protein present (counts) as determined by CBB staining of SDS-PAGE gels. Error bars are standard deviations (n = 3). HiAcrB, AcrBHI.
|
No multidrug resistance phenotype was conferred by AcrBHI variants in the absence of AcrAHI, demonstrating that none of the endogenous AG100AX proteins can complement the AcrAHI function (data not shown).
The lack of AcrAHI affected accessibility as well as expression of AcrBHI-Cys variants. Although the expression of all AcrBHI variants was somewhat lower in the absence of AcrAHI, E42C and I601C variants were expressed at the lowest levels (Fig. 3). Surprisingly, similar to the TolCEC-deficient strain, the accessibility of all AcrBHI-Cys variants was reduced in the absence of AcrAHI (Fig. 3). The increase in Cys accessibility of AcrBHI would be expected if any of these residues were in a direct contact with AcrAHI.
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. The lack of AcrAHI negatively affects the expression and FM accessibility of AcrBHI-Cys. (A) AcrBHI-Cys variants were produced in E. coli AG100AX ( acrAB acrEF) in the presence and absence of AcrAHI and analyzed for FM accessibility as described in the legend of Fig. 1 and in Materials and Methods. (B) Fluorescence intensities of AcrBHI-Cys variants shown in panel A are normalized as described in the legend of Fig. 2. Error bars are standard deviations (n = 3). HiAcrB, AcrBHI; amt, amount.
|
![]() View larger version (86K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Cells lacking either TolCEC or AcrAHI are less permeable for FM. Cells expressing AcrBHI(Q658C) in the presence (+) or absence () of TolCEC and AcrAHI (indicated by B, C, and A, respectively, above the lanes) were treated with increasing concentrations of FM for 30 min at room temperature. Total membrane fractions were isolated, and proteins were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE followed by fluorescence imaging (top panel) and then CBB staining (bottom panel; C). Positions of AcrBHI and AcrAHI are indicated by arrows. Total fluorescence intensity of all proteins bands, not only AcrBHI, decreased in the absence of either TolCEC or AcrAHI. HIAcrA, AcrAHI; HIAcrB, AcrBHI.
|
As seen in Fig. 5 and 6, Triton X-100 reduced labeling of cysteines in all positions, albeit to different degrees. It is unlikely that the effect of Triton X-100 is specific to AcrBHI since AG100AX (
acrAB
acrEF) is resistant to this detergent, and the overproduction of AcrABHI did not affect susceptibility to Triton X-100 (data not shown). Perhaps this detergent interferes with either cysteine or FM reactivity. The accessibility of cysteine residues in the four positions I601C, Q658C, L324C, and L396C was not affected by pretreatment of cells with various compounds. The L396C residue located in the TMS4 remained inaccessible to FM, suggesting that binding of a substrate does not lead to opening of the transmembrane domain. In the presence of all tested substrates, except Triton X-100, the I601C, Q658C, and L324C residues were labeled to the same degree, suggesting that these three residues are not directly involved in binding of substrates or located in the structurally rigid regions of AcrBHI.
![]() View larger version (64K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Substrates modulate the accessibility of AcrBHI-Cys to FM. Whole cells containing the indicated AcrBHI variants were pretreated for 30 min at 37°C with PBS buffer alone (No drug) or containing a 5 mM concentration of the following compounds: erythromycin (Ery), novobiocin (Nov), cloxacillin (Clo), Triton X-100 (TX), ethidium bromide (Et.B.), or inhibitor MC-207,110. After this pretreatment cells were labeled with FM and analyzed as described in the legend of Fig. 1. For each variant, the top panel shows fluorescence intensity (FM) and the bottom panel shows CBB (C) staining.
|
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Substrates modulate the accessibility of AcrBHI-Cys to FM. Fluorescence intensities of AcrBHI-Cys variants shown in Fig. 5 were normalized as described in the legend of Fig. 2 and expressed as a F1/F0 ratio, where F1 is the normalized fluorescence intensity of AcrBHI pretreated with drug and F0 is the normalized fluorescence intensity of AcrBHI pretreated with buffer alone (No drug). Error bars are standard deviations (n = 3). Ery, erythromycin; Nov, novobiocin; Clo, cloxacillin; TX, Triton X-100; EB, ethidium bromide.
|
In addition to E42C and T96C, the accessibility of A288C was also affected by substrates. However, all tested substrates with the exception of ethidium bromide protected A288C from FM. This result suggests that substrates restrict access of FM to the A288C residue. In the crystal structure of AcrBEC, the homologous G290 residue is located in the large binding pocket within
8 Å distance from the bound substrate (16). Thus, the protection of the A288C residue could arise either from direct substrate interference or from the conformational changes in the protein induced by substrates.
|
|
|---|
Substitutions with cysteines in all selected positions did not lead to notable changes in AcrBHI activity or substrate specificity (Table 2) with the exception of the E42C, L324C, and Q658C mutants, which were partially defective in the transport of at least one substrate from among erythromycin, ethidium bromide, and chloramphenicol. Thus, none of the mutated amino acid residues is critical in multidrug efflux. However, the reduced activities of the E42C, L324C, and Q658C mutants suggest that these residues could contribute to the binding or transport of drugs.
Consistent with structure predictions, cysteine residues placed into the periplasmic domain were accessible for labeling with the large, hydrophilic probe FM, albeit to different degrees. E42C, T96C, A288C, and L324C residues were labeled only partially, indicating that the reactivity of these residues could be limited due to hindrance from surrounding amino acid residues. Alternatively, partial accessibility could indicate the heterogeneity of AcrBHI conformations. Recently, two independent studies suggested that during transport reaction AcrBEC cycles through three different conformations (16, 21). Interestingly, the access to T96C, A288C, and L324C from the periplasm differs in these three conformations, with the least access in the "tight-binding" conformer. Furthermore, the conformational transitions of AcrBEC also affect the central cavity, the site of E42C. Thus, partial reactivity of these residues could be due to the conformational heterogeneity of AcrBHI.
Located in the external cleft of the periplasmic domain, I601C and Q658C were readily labeled with FM. Interestingly, AcrAHI, which presumably binds to this region of AcrBHI, did not protect these residues from labeling. In contrast, Q658C was visibly less accessible to FM in the absence of AcrAHI. In addition, the accessibilities of T96C, A288C, and L324C also decreased in the absence of AcrAHI. A similar decrease in Cys accessibility was also observed for the TolC-deficient strain of E. coli. This decrease in FM labeling was not restricted to AcrBHI (Fig. 4). FM labeling of other membrane proteins was also reduced in TolCEC and AcrAHI backgrounds, suggesting that the change in the FM permeability is the major reason for this effect. Previous studies showed that cells lacking TolCEC replace the outer membrane porin OmpF with OmpC, the porin with the much smaller permeability (13). Such substitution could restrict the access of the hydrophilic FM to the periplasm. Similarly, using N-terminal protein sequencing, we found that ECM2112, the TolCEC strain used in this study, produces OmpC. Interestingly, in the AG100AX strain, which is hypersusceptible to multiple drugs due to the lack of major efflux pumps, OmpF is also replaced by OmpC (E. B. Tikhonova and H. Zgurskaya, unpublished data). Thus, replacement of OmpF with the less permeable OmpC seems to be a common response of E. coli to the increased multidrug susceptibility due to the lack of active efflux.
In addition, TolCEC itself could be a route for FM to reach the periplasm and the transporter. Defects in TolCEC, for example, led to hyperresistance to the glycopeptide antibiotic vancomycin, which is too large to pass through the general porins (20). In this case, the lack of AcrAHI could keep TolCEC in the closed conformation, leading to the decrease in FM accessibility.
Low fluorescence signals precluded unequivocal determination of the effect of substrates on AcrBHI-Cys reactivity in the absence of TolCEC or AcrAHI (Fig. 2 and 3; also data not shown). The effect of substrates became apparent when all three components of the operational pump were present. The Cys in A288C was protected from labeling with FM by almost all tested compounds (the only exception is ethidium bromide) including MC-207,110 inhibitor. This result is consistent with the recently reported structure of the ligand-bound AcrBEC, in which the homologous G290 residue is in proximity to bound substrates (16). However, this approach cannot distinguish between hindrance effects caused by substrate binding versus conformational changes. Thus, either one of these factors or both could contribute to protection of the A288C residue from FM.
Two other residues, E42C in the central cavity and T96C located in the periplasmic domain, were also differentially affected by substrates. In contrast to A288C, some substrates (erythromycin and ethidium bromide) significantly enhanced the reactivity of E42C and T96C, suggesting that the conformation of AcrBHI changes in response to substrate binding. A similar substrate-dependent enhancement of labeling with thiol-reactive reagents was also reported for cysteines introduced into the multidrug efflux transporter MdfA (1). Interestingly, the modulation of cysteine accessibility of E42C and T96C depended on the specific substrate. Both erythromycin and ethidium bromide are positively charged compounds, and preincubation with these compounds enhanced labeling with FM. In contrast, negatively charged novobiocin and cloxacillin did not affect the labeling or slightly protected the E42C and T96C residues. This result suggests that various compounds could bind to different surfaces on AcrBHI.
None of the other accessible Cys residues of the AcrBHI mutants changed their reactivity in response to the presence of substrates. In contrast to MexD, all cysteine substitutions were well tolerated by AcrBHI transporter and did not lead to significant changes in MICs. Only L324C and Q658C substitutions partially reduced resistance to several tested compounds (Table 2). Therefore, the lack of effect of substrates in the case of Q658C and L324C could be due to defects in substrate binding. However, it is also possible that these residues, similar to Q601C, do not contribute to substrate binding and located in the conformationally rigid regions of AcrBHI.
We thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments.
Published ahead of print on 25 May 2007. ![]()
Present address: Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Palo Alto, CA 94303. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»