Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, August 2007, p. 5779-5781, Vol. 189, No. 15
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00453-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, 69978
Received 27 March 2007/ Accepted 18 May 2007
|
|
|---|
S and repressed by H-NS, whereas at high temperature, transcription is by
70 independently of both
S and H-NS. Here we present evidence for an additional, novel, temperature-dependent control of Hsp31 expression by increased transcript stability. |
|
|---|
32 (5). It was shown that the hchA gene is transcriptionally regulated by the
S transcriptional activator, which regulates the general stress response in Escherichia coli (2, 5, 8), and that the heat shock induction is presumably due to derepression by H-NS (5). Here we show the existence of an additional, H-NS-independent thermal induction of hchA. This mechanism involves a significant increase in the stability of hchA transcripts upon a shift to higher temperatures. This is a novel method of thermoregulation to control the temperature-dependent expression of a chaperone.
Using quantitative real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, the transcript levels of hchA were monitored at 30°C and 42°C in wild-type cultures and in mutants defective for RpoS and H-NS. The results were in agreement with previous findings showing a higher concentration of Hsp31 in H-NS deletion mutants and indicate that, at low temperature, hchA transcription is carried out by RpoS and repressed by H-NS (5). These results led to the assumption that H-NS represses hchA transcription at low temperature and that its releaseat high temperaturederepresses the system. On the basis of this assumption, one would expect no induction of hchA in hns deletion mutants following temperature upshifts. However, the results presented in Fig. 1 clearly indicate that elevation from 30°C to 42°C results in a sevenfold induction of hchA even in cells depleted of H-NS. This unexpected temperature induction is independent of RpoS and is also independent of the heat shock sigma factor RpoH. These results indicated that hchA induction at 42°C cannot be explained by the release of H-NS alone.
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Temperature-dependent induction of hchA in hns mutants. The levels of hchA transcripts were determined by RT-PCR in K-12 strain MG1655 and its mutant with a deletion of hns (1). Cultures were grown in Luria-Bertani medium with aeration to mid-log phase and shifted from 30°C to 42°C for 10 min. RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR were performed as previously described (3). Each experiment was based on at least four independent biological samples, each of which was run in triplicate. Bars show standard deviations.
|
32-regulated heat shock genes were considerably lower after 15 min than at 5 min following the shift. These results reflect the previously reported transient nature of
32-dependent thermoregulation. In contrast, the level of the hchA transcript was higher after 15 min of heat shock (Table 1). Moreover, we could show by quantitative RT-PCR that, at 42°C, hchA transcript levels were high for at least 60 min. At this time point, the level of transcript was still about 100-fold higher than before the temperature shift (Fig. 2). The high levels of Hsp31 and of hchA transcription that extended for long periods at 42°C were also noted previously (5). A possible explanation for these data are that the shift to higher temperatures involves a change in hchA transcript stability. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Relative transcript levels of heat shock genes encoding chaperones and proteases following a shift to 42°Ca
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Levels of hchA transcripts following transfer to 42°C. The experiment was performed as described for Fig. 1, using the wild-type strain MG1655. Samples were taken at 0, 10, 30, and 60 min.
|
32-induced heat shock gene, are shown for comparison (Fig. 4).
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Stability of hchA transcripts at elevated temperatures. Cultures of strain MG1655 were grown as described for Fig. 1. At an optical density at 600 nm of 0.4, half of the culture was transferred to 42°C and rifampin (500 µg/ml) was added to the two cultures after 5 min (t = 0). Samples were taken at intervals and treated as described for Fig. 1.
|
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Stability of degP transcripts at elevated temperatures. The experiment was performed as described for Fig. 3.
|
S and H-NS.
This work was supported, in part, by the Morris and Manja Leigh Chair for Biophysics and Biotechnology.
Published ahead of print on 25 May 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
S-dependent genes, promoters, and sigma factor selectivity. J. Bacteriol. 187:1591-1603.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»