Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2007, p. 7361-7366, Vol. 189, No. 20
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00706-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology,1 Institute of Integrative and Comparative Biology,2 Institute of Molecular Biophysics and Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom3
Received 3 May 2007/ Accepted 6 August 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a previous study of several motile filamentous cyanobacteria, we demonstrated the presence of a parallel array of 25- to 30-nm diameter fibrils, situated between the peptidoglycan and the OM (3); these fibrils are much wider than those reported by Halfen and Castenholz (11) and Hoiczyck and Baumeister (12, 13). The OM was seen to penetrate between the rows of fibrils, and as a consequence the outer surface of the cells appeared corrugated rather than smooth. To our knowledge, this unique OM topography has not been reported previously in any gram-negative bacteria. Here, we describe the results of a survey of the cell surface topography of several filamentous cyanobacteria by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEGSEM). These techniques have confirmed our earlier observations and demonstrated that such fibrillar arrays are not limited to the genus Oscillatoria but are found in a modified version in the very different cyanobacteria of the genus Nostoc. We have also shown that it is possible to obtain high-resolution AFM scans under liquid of fully hydrated filamentous cyanobacteria. These AFM scans under liquid are the first such scans obtained for filamentous bacteria and, indeed, some of the few obtained for any bacteria.
|
|
|---|
FEGSEM. Samples were fixed with 2.5% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) for 2.5 h. Fixed cells were washed twice, for 30 min each time, in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, and postfixed with 1.0% (wt/vol) osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. The cells were then dehydrated by 30-min washes in a graded ethanol series of 20% (vol/vol), 40%, 60%, and 80% and a final two washes in 100%. Samples were critical-point dried, mounted on aluminum pin stubs, and coated with either a 15- to 20-nm layer of gold or a 5-nm layer of platinum-palladium. Gold coating was done using an Emscope SC500 sputter coating unit, and platinum-palladium coating was done using an Agar Scientific high-resolution sputter coater fitted with an Agar Scientific thickness monitor. Samples were examined with an LEO 1530 series FEGSEM instrument operating at 3 kV.
AFM imaging. Cells were imaged in air and in liquid. Cells imaged in air were transferred to a glass microscope slide and left to air dry for 3 min prior to imaging. Cells imaged in liquid were immobilized by being partially embedded in dental wax (Agar Scientific) in the following way. A thin layer of melted dental wax was spread on the surface of a glass slide, and cyanobacteria was spread on another slide. The two slides were immediately pressed together; once the wax hardened, the slides were separated, and the embedded cyanobacteria were covered with BG11o medium supplemented with 17.6 mM NaNO3 for at least 30 min before imaging.
AFM imaging was performed with a Bioscope AFM equipped with a Nanoscope IV controller (Veeco Instruments, California) operated using the tapping mode. For tapping in air and in fluid, the tips employed were, respectively, NCH Pointprobe tips and NP-S tips (Veeco Instruments) used at a frequency of 27 kHz.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (137K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. FEGSEM image of Oscillatoria sp. strain A2. The original filament has fragmented to release the single cell visible in the center of the micrograph. The fibrillar array is clearly visible as parallel corrugations on the cell surface, which run at an angle to the long axis of the filament. Part of a small, contaminating bacterium can be seen at the upper right of the micrograph. Scale bar, 500 nm.
|
![]() View larger version (91K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. AFM image of Oscillatoria sp. strain A2. The scan was performed on a sample that had been transferred from an agar plate to a glass slide and was, consequently, dehydrated when scanned. Parts of two cells are visible, with a cell septum running vertically down the center of the micrograph. Scale bar, 500 nm.
|
![]() View larger version (221K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. AFM image of Oscillatoria sp. strain A2. The scan was performed on a sample transferred from an agar plate to a glass slide. Parts of two cells are visible, with a cell septum running from the top left to the bottom middle of the micrograph. Scale bar, 200 nm.
|
![]() View larger version (130K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. FEGSEM image of N. punctiforme. Parts of three cells can be seen, the surfaces of which are highly convoluted as a consequence of the fibrillar array beneath the OM. Note the difference between this convoluted array and the parallel array seen in Oscillatoria strain A2 (Fig. 1). Scale bar, 500 nm.
|
![]() View larger version (200K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. AFM image of N. punctiforme. The scan was performed on a sample transferred from agar to a glass slide and was, consequently, dehydrated when scanned. The convolutions seen in Fig. 4 appear disrupted in places. Scale bar, 100 nm.
|
The effect of dehydration on filament diameter is apparent from height measurements made by AFM scanning of filaments in dry and hydrated states; the height of a filament of Oscillatoria strain A2 scanned under dry conditions was approximately 0.9 µm, whereas that of one scanned under liquid was 3 µm (data not shown). The parallel fibrillar array was seen in AFM scans obtained under growth medium, and the cell septa were clearly visible as depressions in the surface (Fig. 6). Despite this dip in the OM at the septum, there appeared to be continuity of each fibril either side of the septum, and this was observed previously in transmission EM images of negatively stained, crushed filaments of another Oscillatoria strain (3). In these fully hydrated filaments, the fibrillar array showed the same regularity apparent in the FEGSEM images (Fig. 1), with none of the disruption seen in the dry AFM scans (Fig. 2 and 3). This implies that drying of the filament causes some disturbance to the fibrils. This is more evident in the case of N. punctiforme since the AFM (Fig. 5) and FEGSEM (Fig. 4) images show even greater differences.
![]() View larger version (171K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. AFM image of Oscillatoria sp. strain A2. The scan was performed under liquid on a sample immobilized in dental wax. Cell septa can be seen at the bottom left and top right of the micrograph. The fibrillar array shows the same highly regular arrangement seen in FEGSEM images (Fig. 1); the partial disruption of the fibrils apparent in the AFM scans of dry samples (Fig. 2 and 3) is not seen in this fully hydrated sample. Scale bar, 500 nm.
|
|
|
|---|
Possible function of the fibrillar array. The possibility that the fibrillar array plays a part in providing structural rigidity to the cell wall can be discounted for two reasons. First, Oscillatoria spp. have very thick peptidoglycan layers (15) and do not require additional strengthening. Second, the fibrils are highly flexible, as can be seen in some areas of the dry AFM images in which fibrils are bent into U shapes (Fig. 3); this is in agreement with our previous transmission EM observations of negatively stained, crushed filaments from which fibrils had been liberated (3).
We have speculated previously that the 25- to 30-nm fibrillar array plays a role in gliding motility (3). The reasons for this are severalfold. First, the array is perfectly placed beneath the OM to provide and deliver the motive force for gliding, which would require an interaction between the cell surface and the substrate on which the filament rests. Second, the pitch of the fibrils in relation to the cell's long axis in cyanobacteria such as Oscillatoria strain A2 (Fig. 1) helps to explain the rotation of such cyanobacteria as they glide. But what mechanism might generate the force for gliding? Rhythmical undulations in the cell surface are one possibility; this was suggested over 30 years ago by Halfen and Castenholz (10, 11). Such undulations could originate in the fibrillar array and be transmitted through the highly flexible OM. Such a model has been subjected to a mathematical analysis by Siddiqui et al. (24). In this model transverse peristaltic waves travel the length of the cell and push exuded slime backwards, producing a force to propel the bacterium in the direction opposite to that of the traveling wave. They concluded that the model could generate sufficient force to propel the cell at a realistic speed and with a power consumption level much less than the organism's likely rate of metabolic energy generation. In such a model in which the fibrillar array generates surface waves, the slime plays a passive role. This contrasts with the model of Hoiczyk and Baumeister (14) in which the extrusion of slime through junctional pores provides the power to drive the filaments. A similar model has been proposed for adventurous motility in M. xanthus in which nozzle-like structures, similar to the junctional pores in cyanobacteria and located at the cell poles, were found to extrude slime (29). At present, experimental proof of these models is lacking although molecular dynamics simulations have recently confirmed that the compression of polymerizing slime within the nozzles could generate sufficient thrust for gliding (17).
When the outermost layer of a cell is the OM, as appears to be the case with Oscillatoria strain A2, it is easy to see how waves generated by the fibrillar array would be transmitted to the surface of the cell via the OM. However, at least some motile, filamentous cyanobacteria possess an S-layer and an oscillin layer external to the OM (13, 15). In this situation, efficient transmission of the waves would require that the S-layer and oscillin layer are sufficiently flexible to ensure propagation of the wave and its interaction with the surface to which the filament is attached. As both are monomolecular layers, it seems likely that they would have the necessary flexibility, although there is currently no proof of this. The convoluted OM topography apparent in the FEGSEM and AFM micrographs presented here cannot be seen in all cyanobacteria, not even in Oscillatoria strains very similar to strain A2, even though we can show by other means that these cyanobacteria possess fibrils (data not shown). The most likely explanation for this is the presence of an S-layer, an oscillin layer, or a polysaccharide sheath external to the OM, which masks its convolutions.
The N. punctiforme fibrillar array. The diameter of the corrugations on the surface of N. punctiforme corresponds well with the corrugations on the Oscillatoria strain A2 cell surface and leads us to conclude that they result from an array of fibrils beneath the OM, although this has not been confirmed by transmission EM of transverse thin sections of Nostoc filaments as it has for Oscillatoria (3). If the fibrillar array provides the motive force for gliding in cyanobacteria such as Oscillatoria strain A2, why should N. punctiforme, which is motile for only a brief stage in its life cycle, the hormogonium, possess an array? In the genus Nostoc, hormogonia are short, small-celled filaments that develop in response to environmental triggers such as dilution of the growth medium or exposure to green light (1, 25). They provide the immotile vegetative filaments with a motile phase for dispersal, but they are only motile for a short period before returning to vegetative growth. The fibrillar array, unchanged in appearance from that in vegetative cells, can be seen in FEGSEM images of Nostoc hormogonia (data not shown), and so fibrils could provide the motive force for hormogonia; but we have evidence that pili are responsible for this (9). If this is the case, then what is the function of the fibrillar array in Nostoc? We can speculate that, prior to the evolution of hormogonia, Nostoc was permanently motile and employed an array of parallel fibrils of the type seen in Oscillatoria strain A2. When the ability to form hormogonia evolved, the fibrils were no longer required. But why were they retained? The answer to this may lie in the effect the fibrils have on OM surface area. When viewed in transverse section, the OM covering each fibril forms an arc. If this is assumed to be a semicircle of diameter D, then by simple geometry it is possible to calculate the increase in surface area of the OM covering the fibril, compared with a flat OM of width D without the fibril; this value is 57%. However, in N. punctiforme the fibrils are not parallel but are convoluted (Fig. 4) and, assuming that each turn of the convolution describes a semicircle, this further increases the surface area by 57%.
How might this increased surface area benefit Nostoc? For many bacteria in the natural environment, growth is limited by the availability of nutrients. Uptake of nutrients occurs via protein channels known as porins in the OM of gram-negative bacteria (20), and the transcription of specific porin genes increases under nutrient starvation (21) and in response to, for example, phosphate starvation (27) and osmotic stress (18). An increase in the number of porin molecules in the OM is therefore an important response to nutrient limitation, and so any increase in the surface area of the OM, with a concomitant increase in porins, may be beneficial. Not all the additional surface area of the OM will be accessible for nutrient uptake because, as the cleft between the fibrils decreases in width as it nears the peptidoglycan layer, the radius of a particular ion will limit its access to porins in that region of the membrane. Nevertheless, there is likely to be a selective advantage for bacteria that increase OM surface area, particularly in oligotrophic environments. It may be for this reason that Nostoc has retained its fibrils.
We thank John Harrington for excellent technical assistance with the FEGSEM.
Published ahead of print on 10 August 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»