Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, November 2007, p. 7626-7633, Vol. 189, No. 21
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00830-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Centre of Microbial and Plant Genetics and INPAC, K.U. Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 20, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium,1 Department of Ultrastructure, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussel, Belgium,2 Department of Molecular and Cellular Interactions, VIB, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussel, Belgium,3 Institute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Research Centre Jülich, 52426 Jülich, Germany4
Received 29 May 2007/ Accepted 23 August 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Strains and plasmids
|
Construction of overexpression strain.
The open reading frame of the ipdC gene of A. brasilense was amplified using PCR with the following primers: Azo-415 (5'-GATCCATATGAAGCTGGCCGAAGCCCTG-3') and Azo-416 (5'-CTAGCTCGAGTTACTCCCGGGGCGCGGCGTG-3'), containing NdeI and XhoI restriction sites, respectively, at the 5' end (underlined in nucleotide sequence). After digestion, the fragment was ligated in a pET28a vector (Novagen). E. coli DH5
was transformed with this construct (called pCMPG9551). After selection of a correct clone by a restriction digest, the expression host E. coli BL21-CodonPlus(DE3)-RP (Stratagene) was transformed with the purified plasmid. The sequence was verified on an ALF Sequencer (Amersham).
Expression and purification of recombinant enzyme.
Two hundred fifty milliliters LB medium was inoculated with 12.5 ml of an overnight culture of BL21-CodonPlus(DE3)-RP(pCMPG9551) and grown at 37°C till it reached a turbidity (595 nm) of 0.5 to 0.7 (2 to 3 h). Protein expression was induced by adding 1 mM isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside. The cultures were grown at 30°C for a further 7 to 8 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4,000 x g for 20 min (4°C), and the pellets were stored at –20°C. For cell disruption, the pellets were resuspended in binding buffer (10 mM 2-morpholinoethanesulfonic acid [MES], 2.5 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM ThDP, 0.5 M KCl, 20 mM imidazole, pH 7.4) supplemented with 1 mg lysozyme per ml binding buffer. After incubation at 37°C for 30 min, the cells were sonicated (200 W; eight times for 10 s each). The cell lysate was cleared by centrifugation (10,000 x g; 25 min; 4°C), and the supernatant was applied to a HisTrap HP column (Amersham). After the column was washed with binding buffer, the recombinant protein was eluted using a linear gradient from 0 to 100% elution buffer (10 mM MES, 2.5 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM ThDP, 0.5 M KCl, 500 mM imidazole, pH 7.4). The protein eluted at an imidazole concentration of 250 mM. The elution fraction was dialyzed against the assay buffer (10 mM MES, 2.5 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM ThDP, pH 6.5), yielding a total dilution factor of 50,000. The protein-containing fractions, the molecular mass of the subunits, and the enzyme purity were determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by Coomassie blue staining, and the protein concentration was determined by direct optical measurement (
280 = 36,840 M–1 cm–1; determined using ProtParam tool; Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics [http://www.expasy.org/tools/protparam.html]) or by the Bradford method (6) using bovine serum albumin as a standard.
Size-exclusion chromatography. The molecular mass of the holoenzyme was estimated by size-exclusion chromatography on a Superdex G200 column, equilibrated with 10 mM MES, 2.5 mM MgSO4, 0.5 mM ThDP, 150 mM KCl, pH 6.5 (flow rate of 1 ml min–1). The molecular mass was estimated by comparing the elution volume (at least three repetitions) with those of known standard proteins (molecular mass in kDa is indicated in parentheses): RNase A (13.7), chymotrypsinogen A (25), ovalbumin (43), albumin (67), aldolase (158), catalase (232), ferritin (440), and thyroglobulin (669). Blue dextran 2000 was used to determine the void volume of the column.
Enzyme assay and kinetic analysis.
The decarboxylation activity was measured using a coupled photometric assay with alcohol dehydrogenase as an auxiliary enzyme (43). A typical reaction mixture (pH 6.5) contained 10 mM MES, 2.5 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM ThDP, 0.35 mM NADH, and 0.125 U alcohol dehydrogenase from horse liver. To avoid interference with the substrates and products, the absorbance was measured at 366 nm (
366, NADH = 2.87 mM–1 cm–1) (30), using a Cary 100 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Varian Inc.). The reaction was followed for 15 min at 30°C. The reaction velocity was converted into the reaction rate (per monomer), and the data were plotted and fitted according to Michaelis-Menten kinetics or the simplified Hill equation using Origin software (version 7; OriginLab Corporation).
Phylogenetic analysis. The BLAST algorithm (1) with IPDCEc and PPDC of A. brasilense (PPDCAb) as baits was used to identify (putative) bacterial PPDCs and IPDCs. Thirty-three amino acid sequences were selected for multiple sequence alignment with ClustalW (36). The alignment was further adapted with the Genedoc program (23) for publication. A phylogenetic tree based on the multiple sequence alignment was constructed using an UPGMA (unweighted-pair group method using average linkages) model with the MEGA software (18), and bootstrap values were used for reliability testing (1,000 replicates).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Growth curves of Azospirillum brasilense and FAJ0009. Data represent means of five replicates of one experiment. Squares, A. brasilense Sp245; triangles, FAJ0009; open symbols, minimal medium for Azospirillum (MMAB) with ammonium as the sole nitrogen source; filled symbols, MMAB with phenylalanine as the sole nitrogen source.
|
A native molecular mass of 240.6 kDa was determined by size-exclusion chromatography for the recombinant PPDCAb, which is consistent with the theoretical mass of a tetramer calculated from the amino acid sequence (240.0 kDa).
Substrate specificity of PPDCAb. The decarboxylase activity of the ThDP-dependent 2-keto acid decarboxylase PPDCAb was followed using a coupled optical test. For substrates showing significant activity, the steady-state parameters were determined. Depending on the reaction rate versus substrate concentration curve, different models were used to analyze the data. The aromatic 2-keto acids phenylpyruvate, IPyA, 4-phenyl-2-oxobutanoic acid, and 5-phenyl-2-oxopentanoic acid are decarboxylated by PPDCAb but with significantly different kinetic parameters (Table 2). No activity was observed with benzoylformate and indole-glyoxylic acid. The enzyme has a kcat/Km of 309 mM–1 min–1 for phenylpyruvate, showing apparently classical Michaelis-Menten kinetics (with a slight deviation from hyperbolicity: Hill coefficient [h] of 1.26 when fitted on the Hill equation). By contrast, the other aromatic substrates showed substrate activation, which is visible from the sigmoidal reaction rate-versus-substrate concentration curves and the deviation from linearity of Eadie-Hofstee plots (Fig. 2). Therefore, the kinetic data were analyzed with the Hill model, yielding kcat/K0.5 = 32 mM–1 min–1 for IPyA, 7 mM–1 min–1 for 4-phenyl-2-oxobutanoic acid, and 339 mM–1 min–1 for 5-phenyl-2-oxopentanoic acid. Hill coefficients for these aromatic substrates were in the range of 1.8 to 1.9. The substrate specificity of PPDCAb was further tested for some commercially available aliphatic and branched-chain 2-keto acids. PPDCAb exhibited no significant activity towards 3-methyl-2-oxopentanoic acid and 4-methyl-2-oxopentanoic acid (maximum substrate concentration, 4 mM). The aliphatic 2-keto acid 2-ketohexanoic acid was a substrate for PPDCAb with kcat/K0.5 = 3 mM–1 min–1. 2-Keto acids with longer aliphatic chains (e.g., 2-keto-octanoic acid at 5 mM) were not converted.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Steady-state kinetic parameters of A. brasilense PPDC
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Determination of the steady-state kinetic parameters of PPDCAb. (Top panels) Plots of initial reaction rates versus substrate concentrations. (Insets) Eadie-Hofstee plots. (Bottom panels) Hill plots of kinetic data. (Left panels) PPDCAb activity with phenylpyruvate. (Right panels) PPDCAb activity with IPyA. The reaction rate was determined as described in Materials and Methods. Data are shown in Table 2.
|
![]() View larger version (119K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Alignment of the amino acid sequences of the ThDP-binding domain. Details of the alignment of a set of (putative) PPDCs and IPDCs are shown. The ThDP-binding domain starts with GDG and ends with NN as defined in reference 14. The conserved glutamine residue, which is replaced by a leucine in (putative) PPDCs, is indicated with an arrow. Abbreviations: A, Azoarcus sp. strain EbN1; Ab, Azospirillum brasilense Sp245; Al, Azospirillum lipoferum FS; Av, Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413; B, Bradyrhizobium sp. strain BTAi1; Bc, Bacillus cereus E33L; Bm, Blastopirellula marina DSM 3645; Bx, Burkholderia xenovorans LB400; Ca, Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824; Dd, Desulfovibrio desulfuricans G20; Eca, Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica SCRI1043; Ecl, Enterobacter cloacae; Gv, Gloeobacter violaceus PCC 7421; Hc, Hahella chejuensis KCTC 2396; Ll, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis IFPL730; Lp, Legionella pneumophila strain Lens; Mc, Methylococcus capsulatus strain Bath; Mt, Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv; Np, Nostoc punctiforme PCC 73102; Pag, Pantoea agglomerans; Par, Psychrobacter arcticus 273-4; Pca, Pelobacter carbinolicus DSM 2380; Ppu, Pseudomonas putida; Ret, Rhizobium etli CFN 42; Reu, Ralstonia eutropha H16; Rf, Rhodoferax ferrireducens T118; Rp, Rhodopseudomonas palustris BisB5; Rr, Rhodospirillum rubrum ATCC 11170; Sa, Staphylococcus aureus RF122; Sm, Sinorhizobium medicae WSM419; St, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2; Sv, Sarcina ventriculi; Ym, Yersinia mollaretii ATCC 43969. Species names boxed in the figure contain IPDCs/PPDCs discussed in the text.
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Phylogenetic tree of (putative) PPDCs and IPDCs. ClustalW was used to align a set of (putative) PPDC and IPDC amino acid sequences. A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the UPGMA method. The values shown at the branches are bootstrap values for 1,000 replicates. For species abbreviations, see the legend to Fig. 3. Boxed abbreviations indicate IPDCs/PPDCs discussed in the text.
|
|
|
|---|
Inactivation of the ipdC gene has no effect on growth in medium with ammonium as a nitrogen source (Fig. 1), indicating that its activity is not required in the central ammonium metabolism of A. brasilense. Nevertheless, when growth of the wild type and that of the mutant were compared in minimal medium with phenylalanine as the sole nitrogen source, FAJ0009 was slightly impaired in growth compared to the wild-type strain. However, a similar growth experiment could not be conducted with tryptophan as neither the wild type nor the mutant can grow with tryptophan as the sole ammonium source. Neither phenylalanine nor tryptophan can be used as a sole carbon/energy source by A. brasilense. This difference in growth could be partially linked to a difference in uptake of the amino acids. As A. brasilense cannot grow on minimal medium with phenylalanine as a carbon source, the generation of compounds necessary for energy formation is insufficient probably due to either a low uptake of phenylalanine, slow conversion by different enzymes (e.g., PPDCAb), or the absence of enzymes necessary for the degradation of intermediates to coenzyme A derivatives. The small but significant effect of the ipdC mutation on growth with phenylalanine as nitrogen source could point to a partial role of the ipdC gene product in the Ehrlich pathway which involves transamination followed by decarboxylation. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae the Ehrlich pathway has been studied extensively for the production of fusel oils. Transcriptome analysis of yeast cells grown in glucose-limited chemostats with phenylalanine as the sole nitrogen source in comparison with cells grown in ammonium revealed that the transcript level of ARO10/YDR380w was increased 30-fold (42). Aro10p was first identified as a PPDC in S. cerevisiae (9, 42); later a broader substrate specificity was proposed (41). The yeast enzyme Aro10p itself has not yet been biochemically characterized.
In a second part of this study, PPDCAb was heterologously overexpressed in E. coli and subsequently purified via immobilized nickel chelate affinity chromatography. The recombinant protein appeared as a tetrameric form in size-exclusion chromatography, which is consistent with other ThDP-dependent 2-keto acid decarboxylases (2, 11, 13) and the recently determined crystal structure of PPDCAb, which shows the enzyme as a dimer of dimers (40). The kinetic analysis revealed quite surprising results. PPDCAb shows near Michaelis-Menten kinetics toward phenylpyruvate (h = 1.26) with the highest specificity constant of all tested substrates (except for 5-phenyl-2-oxopentanoic acid). For all other tested substrates with significant activity, the enzyme is subject to clear substrate activation (h = 1.8 to 1.9). To determine the kinetic parameters of these substrates, the kinetic data were analyzed with the Hill model. The structurally similar substrate IPyA has a 100-fold-lower kcat than does phenylpyruvate. Due to a low K0.5, the kcat/K0.5 value with IPyA is 10-fold lower. To broaden our understanding of the substrate specificity, phenyl-substituted 2-keto acids with a longer alkyl side chain were tested. Surprisingly, 4-phenyl-2-oxobutanoic acid has a 100-fold-lower kcat/K0.5 value, while 5-phenyl-2-oxopentanoic acid (with a side chain elongated by one methylene group) has a kcat/K0.5 value comparable to the kcat/Km value for phenylpyruvate. The reason for the difference between these two compounds could be the position of the keto acid group with respect to the phenyl moiety. Crystal structures of the enzyme cocrystallized with substrate (analogues) should shed further light on this. Benzoylformate (phenylglyoxylic acid), which has a shorter side chain than does phenylpyruvate, and indole-glyoxylic acid are not converted. The substrate activity profile of PPDCAb is clearly distinct from that of IPDCEc. IPDCEc shows activity towards IPyA, benzoylformate, and 4-substituted derivatives with no indication for substrate activation behavior by any of these compounds. Phenylpyruvate is not a substrate for IPDCEc (30). These differences in the substrate range of the A. brasilense protein and IPDCEc indicate an evolutionary difference and would allow the functional classification of the A. brasilense decarboxylase as a PPDC. In general the catalytic activity of PPDCAb is rather low compared to that of 2-keto acid decarboxylases but comparable to the catalytic activity of IPDCEc. As both enzymes are part of a pathway for the synthesis of the plant hormone IAA, to be considered as a secondary metabolite in microorganisms, their activity does not have to be as high as that of other enzymes, like pyruvate decarboxylases, which are involved in an important metabolic pathway (central intermediate metabolism).
Several ThDP-dependent 2-keto acid decarboxylases such as pyruvate decarboxylase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ScPDC) and from Kluyveromyces lactis are activated by their substrate (15, 17, 33). Most bacterial pyruvate decarboxylases, IPDCEc, and benzoylformate decarboxylase display hyperbolic Michaelis-Menten kinetics without any indication of substrate activation (11, 27, 30). The combination of clear substrate activation for certain substrates and hyperbolic Michaelis-Menten kinetics (or only very weak substrate activation) for others in a single enzyme, as observed for the PPDCAb, is less common. The nature of this behavior is currently under investigation. The mechanism of substrate activation in ScPDC has in fact been the subject of discussion for quite a few years. In the most widely accepted mechanism, binding of the substrate to a cysteine residue (Cys221 in ScPDC) distant from the active site is proposed to be the first step in an information transfer cascade to the active site, leading ultimately to increased activity (3, 4). However, in a crystal structure cocrystallized with the substrate surrogate pyruvamide, the activator was found to bind to a site 10 Å away from the pivotal cysteine. Binding of the activator to ScPDC induces a conformational change in the enzyme: two (of the four) active sites transform from an open to a closed (=active) form, which might be the molecular explanation for the substrate activation behavior (21, 22). Since the pivotal cysteine in the proposed activation mechanism of ScPDC is not conserved in PPDCAb (40), it will be interesting to unravel the activation mechanism used by the latter.
Numerous sequences annotated as putative IPDCs and PPDCs are present in the NCBI database, but only for two has the activity of the purified enzymes been determined (PPDCAb [this study] and IPDCEc). To possibly distinguish between these two different kinds of enzyme specificities by in silico analysis, a multiple sequence alignment was performed and a phylogenetic tree was constructed. Strikingly, with the exception of one amino acid residue, all catalytically important residues are conserved in the aligned sequences, indicating the same catalytic mechanism suggested for other 2-keto acid decarboxylases. The multiple sequence alignment allows the division of the sequences into two groups based on the amino acid corresponding to position 468 in IPDCEc (477 in ScPDC numbering): those with Glu and those with Leu. Glu468 is a conserved catalytic residue in pyruvate decarboxylase and IPDCEc, which has been proposed to be involved in both pre- and postdecarboxylation steps. More specifically a role in protonation of the enamine-carbanion intermediate has been proposed (20, 26, 32). Enzymes with amino acid substitutions in this position showed an impaired release of the aldehyde product. In the benzoylformate decarboxylase of Pseudomonas putida, the glutamate residue is also replaced by Leu. Here, protonation of the enamine-carbanion intermediate is proposed to be mediated by a catalytic histidine residue in the active site (27). In PPDCAb, it was proposed that the leucine, which is located underneath the carboxylate group of the lactyl-ThDP intermediate, increases the hydrophobic character of the active site and consequently stabilizes the zwitterionic intermediates (40). In view of this clear partitioning, site-directed mutagenesis studies at this and other amino acid residue positions (see below) are ongoing, to provide information on their role in catalysis and substrate activation.
The phylogenetic tree based on the complete sequences (Fig. 4) also consists of two clades, indicating that the sequences have evolved from at least two different ancestors. For IPDCEc and PPDCAb, this evolutionary difference has been demonstrated via biochemical analysis: PPDCAb converts both phenylpyruvate and IPyA, while IPDCEc shows no activity for phenylpyruvate. Based on the phylogenetic tree, it is tempting to speculate that all members indicated by the bracket "PPDC" can be classified as PPDCs as they cluster with PPDCAb and have a conserved Leu at position 468. However, it should be kept in mind that the biochemical activity of the purified enzyme has been determined for only one representative. The middle bracket of the phylogenetic tree, grouping four sequences, is part of the same clade, but these sequences have a conserved glutamate residue at position 468, in contrast to the other members of the clade. This implies that other amino acid residues are probably involved in determining the substrate specificity, unless a yet-unknown catalytic activity, different from that with IPyA or phenylpyruvate as a substrate, is represented by these four sequences.
Taking previous data and data presented in this study together, we propose the reclassification of the ipdC gene product of A. brasilense as a PPDC (EC 4.1.1.43).
Published ahead of print on 31 August 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»