Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, November 2007, p. 7634-7642, Vol. 189, No. 21
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01007-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Department of Microbiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602,1 Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 306022
Received 25 June 2007/ Accepted 23 August 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Myxococcus xanthus is a member of the deltaproteobacteria, where it lives in soil as a microbial predator. Under starvation conditions, approximately 50,000 cells aggregate into a multicellular fruiting body, wherein some cells differentiate into dormant myxospores. M. xanthus produces an ECM like those of other biofilm-forming organisms. During swarming, cell-cell proximity induces ECM formation (4), which aids social (S) motility (35, 49). ECM biogenesis is strongly induced during starvation and may be essential for fruiting body formation, since dsp and dif mutants, which are completely deficient in ECM production, are also deficient in fruiting body formation (1, 2, 18, 36, 59). Signals controlling ECM production utilize PilA, the structural protein of type IV pili (8, 12), and the Dif chemosensory system (6, 9, 13, 59), which is composed of DifA (a methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein homolog), DifC (a CheW coupling protein homolog), and DifE (a CheA histidine kinase homolog). The Dif system is also required for development. Development in difACE mutants can be restored with exogenously supplied M. xanthus ECM (17, 59).
M. xanthus ECM is composed of 55% carbohydrate and 45% protein (3). The carbohydrate portion contains primarily glucose and glucosamine, with galactose, rhamnose, and xylose as lesser components (3). The ECM proteins are tightly associated with the exopolysaccharide, requiring detergent and boiling to remove them (5). FibA, the only known ECM protein, is a zinc metalloprotease of the elastase family (5, 29) and the most abundant protein associated with the ECM (5). FibA is required for chemotaxis to lipids and, under certain conditions, fruiting body development. During starvation, M. xanthus responds to membrane phospholipids containing the fatty acid 16:1
5c (20, 31). A FibA active-site mutant is incapable of chemotaxis towards this molecule (12, 29), although the substrate and role of this enzyme in chemotaxis remain unknown. While disruption of fibA has no obvious effect on development, disruption of both fibA and pilA, the gene encoding the major pilus structural protein (34), abolishes development. It is unclear whether development involves lipid chemotaxis or another as yet unknown FibA-mediated process.
Deletion of pilA results in a lack of S motility and a delay in development (57); however, these cells still form fruiting bodies using A motility. The pilT mutant forms pili but is unable to retract them and also lacks S motility (58). While the fibA pilA mutant is unable to develop (12), a fibA pilT mutant develops normally (12). This result suggests that the PilA requirement for development is due not to its role in S motility but rather to its requirement for ECM biogenesis. Strains carrying a disruption in pilT (which causes hyperpiliation [58]) overproduce ECM (8). dif mutations are epistatic on pil mutations, showing that pilus signaling functions upstream of the Dif system in ECM biogenesis (8). These results argue that PilA or the structural pilus serves as a sensor for signal transduction leading to ECM biogenesis. Given that characterized signaling processes for both FibA and PilA pass through the Dif system and that dif mutations abolish development, one interpretation of these results is that the DifACE signaling pathway has two sensory inputs, one involving PilA (or the pilus) and the other involving FibA, that are functionally redundant for fruiting body development (12). The specific signals sensed, the method of signal transduction into the DifACE system, and the specific outputs that impact development remain unknown.
Proteomic analysis was used to identify matrix-associated proteins and to examine their possible roles in development. A number of novel proteins are associated with the matrix, but only one protein could be added to the DifACE pathway.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Strains used in this study
|
To induce development, 7.5 ml of 5 x 109 cells ml–1 were plated on TPM agar (10 mM Tris HCl, 8 mM MgSO4, 1 mM K2HPO4-KH2PO4, 1.5% Difco agar, pH 7.6) in a 33- by 22-cm tray and incubated at 32°C for 24 h. Fruiting bodies were harvested by scraping with a razor blade. ECM material was collected using a modification of the method described by Behmlander and Dworkin (5). Five milliliters of TNE buffer (10 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA [4]) was added to the cell suspension and stirred for 10 min at room temperature. Five milliliters of TNE containing 1.0% SDS was then added and stirred for 30 min. The solution was centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C and the supernatant discarded. The pellet was resuspended in 5.0 ml TNE containing 0.5% SDS and stirred for 1 h at room temperature. The suspension was centrifuged at 12,000 x g at 4°C for 10 min and the supernatant discarded. The pellet was washed once with 5.0 ml TNE, twice with 5.0 ml 10 mM MOPS, and twice with 5.0 ml cohesion buffer (10 mM MOPS [pH 6.8], 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2). Finally, the pellet was resuspended in 1.0 ml of cohesion buffer containing 5x complete EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and stored at 4°C. A variation of this procedure using 0.1% SDS in the two initial wash steps (5) contained a wider variety of proteins, including more membrane proteins.
Extraction of matrix-associated proteins. Proteins were solubilized from the ECM by boiling in SDS. Solubilized proteins were separated from the insoluble ECM material by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) long enough for the proteins to enter the resolving gel but not separate into distinct bands. The SDS was removed from the gel by washing, allowing digestion of proteins within the gel slice with trypsin. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used in the identification of tryptic fragments of ECM proteins.
Two milliliters of purified ECM material containing 127 µg ml–1 protein was pelleted by centrifuging at 12,000 x g for 10 min at room temperature. The pellet was resuspended in 400 µl cohesion buffer containing 3% SDS. Dithiothreitol (DTT) was added to a final concentration of 100 mM and protease inhibitor to a 2.5x concentration. The suspension was boiled for 30 min and nonsolubilized material pelleted by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 62,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and concentrated using a Microcon YM-3 centrifugation filter (3,000-molecular-weight cutoff) for 1.5 h, resulting in a fivefold concentration of protein (approximately 80 µl volume). To this, 40 µl of sample buffer (52.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 25% glycerol, 0.01% bromophenol blue, 100 mM DTT) was added, and the mixture was boiled for 15 min. The total solution was then loaded on a 12% SDS polyacrylamide gel over multiple lanes. The gel was run at 50-mA current until the proteins migrated through the stacking gel and began to enter the resolving gel. Protein detection was performed using Silver Stain Plus (Bio-Rad). It is difficult to judge the efficiency with which the protein extraction method worked due to the presence of DTT, which is detrimental to standard protein quantification assays.
The portion of the gel containing protein (approximately 1.0 by 1.5 cm) was excised, cut into smaller fragments, destained with 200 µl 15 mM potassium ferricyanide-50 mM sodium thiosulfate, and washed three times with 200 µl water. The gel pieces were dehydrated by washing them three times with 200 µl of 20 mM ammonium bicarbonate containing 50% (vol/vol) acetonitrile for 15 min each, followed by one 15-min wash with 200 µl acetonitrile. The gel slices were dried under vacuum and rehydrated with 100 µl of 10 mM DTT in 40 mM ammonium bicarbonate at 55°C for 1 h, at which point the solution was exchanged for 100 µl of 55 mM iodoacetamide-40 mM ammonium bicarbonate and incubated for 45 min at room temperature. The gel pieces were washed three times with 200 µl of 20 mM ammonium bicarbonate in 50% (vol/vol) acetonitrile and once with 100% acetonitrile for 15 min and then dried under vacuum. The gel pieces were rehydrated with 100 µl of 10 ng µl–1 proteomics-grade trypsin (Sigma) in 40 mM ammonium bicarbonate and incubated on ice for 45 min and then with 100 µl of 40 mM ammonium bicarbonate, with incubation at 37°C overnight. Solutions from the trypsin digestion were pooled. The gel slices were washed with 150 µl of 2.5% trifluoroacetic acid in 50% acetonitrile three times for 10 min each. The washes were combined with the solutions from the previous step and taken to dryness under vacuum.
Proteomic identification of ECM proteins.
The peptide samples obtained from proteolytic digestion were analyzed on an Agilent 1100 capillary LC (Palo Alto, CA) interfaced directly to a LTQ linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA). Mobile phases A and B were H2O-0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile-0.1% formic acid, respectively. The peptide samples were loaded for 30 min using positive N2 pressure on a PicoFrit 8-cm by 50-µm column (New Objective, Woburn, MA) packed with 5-µm-diameter C18 beads. The peptides were then desalted for 10 min with 0.1% formic acid using positive N2 pressure. Peptides were eluted from the column into the mass spectrometer during a 90-min linear gradient from 5 to 60% of total solution composed of mobile phase B at a flow rate of 200
l min–1. The instrument was set to acquire MS/MS spectra on the nine most abundant precursor ions from each MS scan with a repeat count of 3 and repeat duration of 15 s. Dynamic exclusion was enabled for 20 s. Raw tandem mass spectra were converted into the mzXML format and then into peak lists using ReAdW software followed by mzMXL2Other software (40). The peak lists were then searched using Mascot 1.9 software (Matrix Science, Boston, MA).
Database searching and protein identification. Two sequence databases were constructed. The first database (normal) consisted of annotated proteins from M. xanthus genes (as annotated by The Institute for Genome Research and provided by Roy Welch). A decoy database (random) was constructed by reversing the sequences in the normal database. Database searches were performed against the normal and random databases using the following parameters: full tryptic enzymatic cleavage with three possible missed cleavages, peptide tolerance of 500 parts-per-million, fragment ion tolerance of 0.6 Da, and a variable modification due to carboxyamidomethylation (+57 Da). The identified peptides were grouped into proteins and statistically validated using PROVALT software (53). Only proteins meeting with a protein false-discovery rate of less than 1% were considered to be statistically significant. Protein sequences were analyzed using LipoP (44), pfam (http://pfam.janelia.org/hmmsearch.shtml), and Prosite (http://us.expasy.org/tools/scanprosite/).
Mutagenesis of ECM proteins. Genes for 14 putative ECM proteins were disrupted by insertion of a plasmid containing an internal fragment of each gene. The internal fragments were generated by PCR (see the supplemental material for primers). Primers were designed to result in as large a 3' deletion as possible. PCR products were separated on 1.0% agarose, excised, extracted using the Gel Extraction kit (QIAGEN), and cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen). The identity of each insert was verified by DNA sequencing. Each plasmid was electroporated in M. xanthus DK1622 with selection on CYE containing 100 µg ml–1 kanamycin. Genomic DNA was purified from each transformant using the Easy DNA extraction kit (Invitrogen). To verify the mutations, primers were used to amplify genomic DNA from sites outside of the internal fragment (see diagnostic primers in the supplemental material). Plasmid integration causes a mobility shift of the wild-type amplicon such that disrupted transformants have PCR products the size of the wild-type allele plus the size of the plasmid (3.9 kb).
In order to transfer the mutations to the pilA and fibA strains, approximately 3.75 µg of genomic DNA from each mutant strain was electroporated into strains DK10410 and LS2429 (28, 52), except for strains LS2355, LS2389, LS2392, and LS2393, where plasmids were used directly for disruption. Selection and screening were performed as before.
Development assay. Cells from exponentially growing cultures were pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended to cell densities of 5 x 108, 2.5 x 109, 5 x 109, and 7.5 x 109 cells ml–1 in CYE broth. Ten microliters of each cell suspension was spotted in duplicate on TPM agar plates and incubated at 32°C for 5 days. The cell spots were viewed using a Wild Heerbrugg dissecting microscope, and images were captured every 24 h with a Spot Insight 2 camera using the Spot v4.5 software (Diagnostic Instruments, Inc.).
Spore assay. Cells from exponentially growing cultures were resuspended in CYE broth at a density of 5 x 109 cells ml–1, and 10-µl spots were plated on TPM agar. After incubation at 32°C for 5 days, fruiting bodies were collected with a sterile razor blade and resuspended in 0.5 ml TPM buffer. The fruiting bodies were then sonicated at a 60% duty cycle for 10 s on an Ultrasonic Processor sonicator (Heat Systems- Ultrasonics Inc.) and incubated at 55°C for 2 h. Refractile myxospores were quantified using a Petroff-Hausser counting chamber. Spores were diluted and plated on CYE or CYE Km to enumerate viable spores. Spore production was examined for select strains every 24 h for 5 days.
FibA antibody and Western blot analysis. fibA was cloned into vector pET-TOPO 102/D to create a six-His C-terminal fusion, and the construct was expressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21 Star DE3 (Invitrogen). Purification was performed using the ProBond purification system (Invitrogen). Polyclonal antibodies were generated by Antibodies, Inc. Cell lysates were prepared from 5 x 107 mid-log phase DK1622 and LS2429 cells. ECM material was prepared as described. Cell lysates and 5 µg ECM protein were separated on a 12.5% SDS-PAGE gel in triplicate. Proteins were electroblotted on nitrocellulose. Each set was probed with different primary antibodies. The polyclonal antibody was diluted 1:7,500, and the Mab2105 (4) and multiple-antigen peptide (12) antibodies were diluted 1:500. All dilutions were prepared in PBST (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, and 0.05% Tween 20) containing 2.5% dry milk. Secondary antibodies horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G were diluted 1:5,000 in PBST. The immunoblot was developed with the ECL luminescence detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ).
|
|
|---|
Identification of ECM proteins. A total of 41 proteins were identified with 99% confidence. Putative ECM proteins were selected from the list based on the presence of a Sec-dependent secretion signal using the LipoP program (26), the absence of transmembrane helices, and the lack of conserved membrane domain structures. While integral membrane proteins may serve as points of attachment of ECM components to the cell surface or channels for their secretion, there is no direct evidence that the ECM contains a lipid bilayer, so putative integral membrane proteins were removed from the list. These criteria reduced the number to 21 putative ECM proteins (Table 2). Eighteen of the twenty-one putative ECM proteins were also found in another ECM sample prepared with 0.1% SDS instead of 0.5% SDS (data not shown). The sample prepared with 0.1% SDS contained a higher proportion of non-ECM proteins, and for that reason it was less specific in extracting ECM proteins. FibA has been shown to be associated with the ECM using immunogold labeling (4), and identification of FibA in the present study (Table 2) suggests that the ECM isolation technique enriches for ECM proteins.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Putative ECM proteins in M. xanthus
|
Other proteins identified in this fraction that are unlikely to be associated with the ECM are listed in Table 3. The presence of PilQ suggests that ECM enrichment also contains material from cell poles. PilQ forms the outer membrane pore for polarly localized pili. The membranes at M. xanthus cell poles appear to be difficult to separate (46), and it is possible that 0.5% SDS was unable to completely solubilize these polar complexes. Additionally, the LC-MS/MS technique is very sensitive, which may have allowed for identification of highly abundant intracellular proteins.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Non-ECM proteins identified by proteomic analysis and putative cellular location
|
Genes encoding ECM proteins were disrupted in the wild type (DK1622) and screened for fruiting body defects after spotting of 5 x 106 cells for 72 h (see the supplemental material for fruiting body assays). All mutants developed at similar rates and had a fruiting body distribution similar to that of DK1622. Previous work provided genetic evidence that FibA and PilA are components of partially redundant pathways for fruiting body morphogenesis (12). While fibA and pilA mutants form fruiting bodies, the double mutant neither aggregates nor sporulates (12). Therefore, each mutation was placed in pilA (DK10410) and fibA (LS2429) backgrounds to determine whether these proteins function in a particular branch of the pathway. The fruiting bodies of the pilA mutant are more numerous and closely packed. With the exception of the MXAN4860 mutation, strains containing each mutation in combination with pilA develop comparably to the pilA parent strain. Strains containing each mutation in combination with fibA demonstrate the same timing and distribution of development as the wild type.
All strains were assessed for spore production and viability (Fig. 1). In order to obtain enough spores to facilitate enumeration, spore assays were performed using 10-fold more cells than the fruiting body assays (see the supplemental material). The majority of the mutants produced spores within 1.5-fold levels of each other and the parent strain, and approximately 40 to 75% of the spores were viable. There are some exceptions worth noting. Disruption of the MXAN7023 gene in DK1622 caused a nearly twofold increase in spore production and a more modest increase in viable spores. Similarly, the MXAN4915 fibA mutant produced nearly twofold more spores than the fibA parent, but viable spore production was similar to that of the parent strain. Disruption of the MXAN2710 gene in the pilA background caused no defect in total spore production but a 10-fold decrease in spore viability. Similarly, disruption of the MXAN5391 gene in fibA reduces viable spore production more substantially that total spore production.
![]() View larger version (47K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Spore production and viability of ECM mutants. Total spores from 5 x 107 cells incubated for 5 days were enumerated microscopically (solid bars). Viable spores were determined by plating spores on CYE agar (hatched bars). Error bars indicate the standard deviation. The top-left area of each panel displays the genetic background containing each mutation: WT, wild type, DK1622; pilA, pilA, DK10410; fibA, fibA, LS2429.
|
![]() View larger version (94K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Primary structure analysis of MXAN4860 and developmental timing of MXAN4860 disruptions in wild-type and pilA strains. (A) Schematic of the MXAN4860 protein product. Vertical white bars indicate positions of 20 cysteine residues found in the N-terminal portion of the protein. Gray boxes indicate the tryptic peptides detected by mass spectrometry. The numbers indicate amino acid positions: 1, the start of the protein; 173, the start of the first peptide detected by mass spectrometry; 298, the end of the protein. (B) Developmental time course of fruiting body morphogenesis. Cells (5 x 106) were spotted in 10 µl on TPM agar and photographed every 24 h. Strains with the MXAN4860 mutation develop normally unless it is coupled with a pilA mutation, in which case there is an approximately 24-h delay in development between the 48- and 72-h time points. Bar = 1 mm.
|
Spore yields for all MXAN4860 mutants as well as parent strains were measured every 24 h for 5 days (Fig. 3). The MXAN4860 and MXAN4860 fibA mutants had timing and spore yields similar to those of their respective parents. Sporulation in the pilA strain was delayed 24 h compared to that of the wild type; however, by 72 h, spore production had reached wild-type levels. At 72 h, the MXAN4860 pilA mutant showed 46% sporulation compared to that of its parent. By 96 h, the MXAN4860 pilA mutant produced the same number of spores as the pilA strain. The sporulation levels suggested an approximately 18-h delay in sporulation, corroborating the observed delay in fruiting body morphogenesis.
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Sporulation time courses of MXAN4860 mutants compared to wild-type, pilA, and fibA strains. Cells (5 x 107) of each strain were plated on TPM and harvested at 24-h intervals. Spores were quantified using a Petroff-Hausser counting chamber. (A) Wild-type (DK1622, filled squares) and MXAN4860 (open squares) strains. (B) pilA (DK10410, filled triangle) and MXAN4860 pilA (open triangle) strains. (C) fibA (LS2429, filled diamond) and MXAN4860 fibA (open diamond) strains. Error bars indicate standard deviations.
|
![]() View larger version (78K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Analysis of FibA fragmentation patterns. (A) Primary structure analysis of FibA. Horizontal lines indicate the lipoprotein secretion signal (*; amino acids 1 to 20), propeptide domain (amino acids 93 to 228), catalytic domain (amino acids 244 to 517), PPC domain 1 (amino acids 542 to 626), and PPC domain 2 (647 to 734) (12). Gray boxes indicate peptides detected by mass spectrometry. (B) Western blot using anti-FibA ( FibA) polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Wild-type (WT) and fibA whole-cell extracts were prepared from 5 x 107 exponentially growing cells. ECM material containing 5 µg protein was also analyzed. Arrowheads indicate the major degradation product.
|
|
|
|---|
The unusual N-terminal domain may offer an insight into the function of the MXAN4860 protein. MXAN4860 shares some characteristics with Wnt proteins, a large family of eukaryotic proteins controlling development in organisms from nematodes to mammals (56). Wnt proteins are approximately 350 to 390 amino acids in length and have 22 conserved cysteines. They are secreted, bind tightly with glycosaminoglycans in the ECM, and are difficult to extract from matrix fractions (14, 43). Interaction between Wnt and a cell surface receptor (such as Fz or LRP5/6) transduces an extracellular signal into intracellular responses (19), including the planar cell polarity pathway regulating tissue polarity, cell migration, and cytoskeleton arrangement. Another eukaryotic protein involved in some of the same pathways as Wnt is Norrin. Norrin, like Wnt, is a secreted signaling protein (approximately 130 amino acids in length with 11 conserved cysteines), interacting with specific Fz and LRP receptors (7). Though Norrin is cysteine rich like Wnt, they are unrelated, suggesting that cysteine richness may have a conserved function in intercellular signaling in unrelated proteins. Interestingly, some Wnts are acylated, and it has been shown in at least one case that acylation is necessary for signaling (32). MXAN4860 is predicted to have a lipoprotein secretion signal and therefore may also be acylated.
Thirteen of twenty-one putative ECM proteins (62%) have lipoprotein secretion signals. The structural function of acylation is to anchor proteins to either the outer membrane or the outer face of the inner membrane. While membrane targeting of these proteins would seem to preclude secretion to the ECM, FibA is a lipoprotein that is associated with the inner membrane, likely in the acylated, catalytically inactive proform (46), but is also associated with the ECM (4). It is possible that temporary targeting of ECM proteins to the inner membrane may be a method of keeping ECM proteins inactive until they are secreted.
Proteomic analysis of FibA may offer new insight into its function. FibA contains a lipoprotein secretion signal, a propeptide domain to regulate catalytic function, the catalytic domain, and two C-terminal PPC repeat domains of unknown function (Fig. 4A) (12). The epitope for FibA monoclonal antibody Mab2105 is proposed to be located in the last C-terminal repeat, within the final 107 amino acids of the protein (12). Western blots using this antibody against proteins liberated from the ECM reveal bands of different sizes, indicating that FibA is proteolytically processed into several pieces (5, 12) (Fig. 4B). Most peptide fragments detected by LC-MS/MS are from the C-terminal repeats and C-terminal side of the catalytic domain (Fig. 4A). This result corroborates the Western results showing that the PPC repeats are found associated with the ECM (12). C-terminal repeats in eukaryotic matrix metalloproteinases confer substrate specificity by anchoring the enzyme next to the substrate (for a review, see reference 39), and by analogy FibA repeats may interact with the FibA substrate(s) and/or anchor FibA to the ECM. Western blot results also indicate that the catalytic domain is present in the ECM (29) (Fig. 4B). The lack of peptide detection from the majority of the catalytic domain may indicate that the catalytic domain is protease resistant or less abundant than the repeats.
While MXAN4860 and MXAN4860 fibA mutants develop, the MXAN4860 pilA mutant is delayed in development compared to the pilA mutant. This pattern of phenotypes is consistent with MXAN4860 functioning in the FibA mediated developmental process. However, if the MXAN4860-FibA process were linear, disruption of MXAN4860 in the pilA background would abolish development like a fibA pilA disruption. Instead only a partial defect was observed, suggesting that multiple processes integrate into or out of FibA including an MXAN4860-mediated process affecting developmental timing. One possibility is that FibA may be part of a protease cascade since FibA containing a mutation in a critical active site residue is still processed in vivo (12). In humans, membrane-associated matrix metalloproteinase 1 proteolytically activates extracellular matrix metalloproteinase 2 (gelatinase A) and is regulated by a prostaglandin-cAMP pathway (45). By analogy, FibA may activate other extracellular proteins in a protease cascade to effect signaling.
None of the genes encoding putative ECM proteins are essential for cell attachment, adventurous or social motility, or fruiting body formation and sporulation (outside of MXAN4860 and MXAN2710). Some of these processes have been shown to be dependent on the ECM (1, 2, 35, 36, 59), which would suggest that the polysaccharide component of the matrix performs the bulk of the ECM functions. However, so far it has been impossible to separate the functions of polysaccharide and protein in the ECM as no mutants or conditions have been described where developing cells produce polysaccharide without associated protein. The lack of striking phenotypes in ECM protein disruptions may be due in some cases to functional redundancy of protein components, which has been well established for this organism. The fibA and pilA deletions cause little loss of development unless they are combined. It is also possible that critical components of the ECM proteome were not detected in this analysis. Phenol extraction of 0.5% SDS-isolated ECM removed only 57% of the protein content (data not shown), indicating that a significant portion of ECM protein may be either covalently coupled or difficult to extract. Identification and characterization of more tightly associated ECM proteins may reveal new signaling and structural capacities of the ECM and increase the understanding of previously identified ECM-mediated functions.
This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no. 0343874 to L. Shimkets.
Published ahead of print on 31 August 2007. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
during mammary gland remodeling. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 292:E1140-E1148.This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»