This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Losick, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Losick, R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, November 2007, p. 7681-7689, Vol. 189, No. 21
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.01053-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

gerT, a Newly Discovered Germination Gene under the Control of the Sporulation Transcription Factor {sigma}K in Bacillus subtilis{triangledown}

Caitlin C. Ferguson, Amy H. Camp, and Richard Losick*

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138

Received 4 July 2007/ Accepted 20 August 2007


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
We report the identification of a gene, herein designated gerT (formerly yozR), that is involved in germination by spores of Bacillus subtilis. The gerT gene is induced late in sporulation under the positive control of the transcription factor {sigma}K and under the negative control of the DNA-binding protein GerE. The gerT gene product (GerT) is a component of the spore coat, and its incorporation into the coat takes place in two stages. GerT initially assembles into foci, which then spread around the developing spore in a process that is dependent on the morphogenetic protein CotE. Mutant spores lacking GerT respond poorly to multiple germinants and are impaired at an early stage of germination.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
Bacillus subtilis is a gram-positive soil bacterium that is capable of metamorphosing into a dormant cell known as the spore (or more properly, the endospore) (14, 23). Under conditions of nutrient availability, B. subtilis cells are metabolically active and grow and divide by binary fission. When nutrients become scarce, however, the cells initiate the process of sporulation and undergo a single round of asymmetric division to form two distinct cell types: the mother cell and the forespore, the prospective spore. The septal membranes dividing the two cells then migrate around the forespore in a process known as engulfment. Ultimately, the forespore is pinched off as a protoplast in the mother-cell cytoplasm, surrounded by a double membrane. Protective layers are then assembled around the forespore: a peptidoglycan cortex between the two membranes and a proteinaceous shell, the coat, around the outer membrane. The coat, which consists of an inner coat and an outer coat, is a complex structure that is composed of more than 50 proteins (2, 4, 11-13). Once the spore is fully mature, the mother cell lyses and releases the spore, which can survive for long periods of time in a dormant, metabolically inactive state, protected from harsh environmental conditions. However, the spore is equipped to monitor its environment and rapidly resumes vegetative growth when exposed to nutrients in a process known as germination (20, 29).

Gene expression during sporulation is governed by the ordered appearance of a series of RNA polymerase sigma factors and DNA-binding proteins (32). The last sigma factor to appear is {sigma}K, which acts in the mother cell and is responsible for the transcription of approximately 89 single-gene transcription units and operons (5). Many of these {sigma}K-controlled genes contribute to spore formation, to the formation of the spore coat, and to the formation of a spore that is competent to germinate efficiently. One of the genes under {sigma}K control, gerE, encodes the terminal transcription factor in the sporulation regulatory cascade. The gerE gene encodes a DNA-binding protein that is both an activator and a repressor. GerE acts in conjunction with {sigma}K-containing RNA polymerase to turn on the expression of the final class of sporulation genes. The appearance of GerE also switches off the expression of some genes that had been activated by {sigma}K.

Here we report the identification of a member of the {sigma}K regulon, yozR, that is involved in spore germination. The yozR gene, which we henceforth refer to as gerT, is a newly identified member of the {sigma}K regulon that had been overlooked in earlier transcriptional profiling experiments (5, 30). As in the case of certain other members of the regulon, gerT is switched on by {sigma}K and then switched off by the appearance of the DNA-binding protein GerE (5). The gerT gene product is herein shown to be a component of the coat that is incorporated into the protein shell that surrounds the spore in a two-step process. Evidence indicates that spores lacking GerT, which respond poorly to a variety of germinants, are impaired at an early stage of germination.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
Growth conditions. Strains were grown in Luria-Bertani medium (LB) at 37°C unless otherwise noted. The following antibiotics were included when appropriate: chloramphenicol (5 µg/ml), erythromycin plus lincomycin (1 µg/ml and 25 µg/ml, respectively), spectinomycin (100 µg/ml), ampicillin (100 µg/ml), kanamycin (5 µg/ml; also used to select for neomycin resistance), and tetracycline (10 µg/ml).

Strain and plasmid construction. Strains and plasmids used for this study are listed in Table 1. B. subtilis strains were derived from the wild-type strain PY79 (38) or, for the strains used in Fig. 4, the wild-type strain PS832 (gift of Peter Setlow). B. subtilis competent cells were prepared by the one-step method previously described (37). All PCR products utilized in plasmid construction were amplified from PY79 chromosomal DNA; primers used for the generation of these and other PCR products are listed in Table 2. All plasmids were propagated in Escherichia coli strain DH5{alpha}, with the exception that the integration plasmid pCF170 (see below) was passaged through the recA+ E. coli host TG1 prior to being used for transformation of B. subtilis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Strains and plasmids used in this study


Figure 4
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 4. gerT mutant spores are impaired in release of DPA during germination and in responding to DPA as a germinant. (A) Purified spores of the wild type (black; strain PS832), a gerT mutant (gray; strain CF280), and a gerT mutant harboring a copy of gerT at the amyE locus (white; strain CF292) were germinated with L-alanine. Samples were collected by centrifugation at the indicated times and assayed for DPA. (B) Wild-type (squares; strain PS832), gerA mutant (diamonds, left-hand panel; strain CF224), and gerT mutant (triangles, right-hand panel; strain CF280) spores were germinated in L-alanine (white) or Ca2+-DPA (black). Samples were collected at the indicated times and then tested for heat resistance.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Primers used in this study

To generate the translational gerT-lacZ reporter gene (pCF173), a PCR fragment containing the first 6 codons of gerT and approximately 325 bp of upstream sequence was amplified using the oligonucleotide primers oCF120 and oCF121, digested with BamHI/SalI, and ligated into BamHI/SalI-digested pDG1728 (7). Transformation of PY79 with pCF173 yielded CF174 (amyE::gerT-lacZ spc). To generate CF183 (spoIVCB{Delta}::erm amyE::gerT-lacZ spc) and CF184 (gerE{Delta}::cm amyE::gerT-lacZ spc), PE451 (gift of Patrick Stragier) and PE454 (5), respectively, were transformed to spectinomycin resistance with chromosomal DNA from CF174.

To create a strain expressing gerT-gfp, the oligonucleotide primers oCF116 and oCF117 were used to amplify nucleotides 113 to 471 of the gerT coding sequence, omitting the stop codon after base 471. This fragment was digested with BamHI/XhoI and ligated with BamHI/XhoI-digested pCVO119 (33), yielding an in-frame fusion of the gerT coding fragment to gfp, pCF170. Single-recombination integration of pCF170 into PY79 yielded CF172 [gerT{Omega}pCF170(gerT-gfp) spc]. The gerT-gfp fusion was judged to be functional based on the normal germination of CF172-derived spores. CF177 [cotE{Delta}:cm gerT{Omega}pCF170(gerT-gfp) spc] and CF178 [spoIVA{Delta}::neo gerT{Omega}pCF170(gerT-gfp) spc] were generated by transformation of RL322 and RL1397, respectively (3, 39) to spectinomycin resistance with chromosomal DNA from CF172.

We used the long-flanking homology PCR method (34) for creating deletion/insertion mutants using the following primers: oCF23, oCF24, oCF25, and oCF26 for {Delta}1::tet (CF111), oCF94, oCF95, oCF96, and oCF97 for {Delta}2::erm (CF152), oCF108, oCF109, oCF110, and oCF111 for gerT{Delta}::spc ({Delta}3) (CF164); oCF300, oCF301, oCF302, and oCF303 for gerT{Delta}::erm ({Delta}3) (CF203); and oCF310, oCF311, oCF312, and oCF313 for gerA{Delta}::erm (CF224). pDG1726 was used as the source for the spectinomycin cassette, pDG1514 for the tetracycline cassette, pDG646 for the erythromycin cassette for CF152 ({Delta}2::erm), and pAH52 [constructed by subcloning the BamHI/ClaI fragment from pDG646 into pBluescript KS(+)] for the erythromycin cassette for CF203 (gerT{Delta}::erm) (7). Strain PY79 was directly transformed with long-flanking homology PCR products with selection for the appropriate antibiotic resistance. Mutants were confirmed by PCR. Chromosomal DNA from CF203 was used to transform PS832 to make CF280 (gerT{Delta}::erm).

To generate a strain expressing gerT at the amyE locus, the gerT coding sequence and approximately 230 bp of upstream sequence were amplified with primers oCF112 and oCF113, digested with EcoRI/BamHI, and ligated with EcoR1/BamHI-digested pDG364 (7) to create pCF165. Transformation of CF164 with pCF165 yielded CF167 (gerT{Delta}::spc amyE::gerT cm). CF292 (gerT{Delta}::erm amyE::gerT cm) was constructed by transforming CF280 to chloramphenicol resistance with chromosomal DNA from CF167.

To construct pAH60, a SpeI/SalI fragment containing the luxABCDE luciferase-encoding operon from Photorhabdus luminescens (optimized for expression in low-G+C gram-positive bacteria) was liberated from pSB2025 (24) and ligated into NheI/SalI-digested pDR111 (gift of David Rudner). The resulting Phyperspank promoter fusion to luxABCDE permits high-level, constitutive expression of bacterial luciferase in the presence of the inducer isopropyl ß-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside. PY79 and CF203 were transformed with pAH60 to create AHB83 (amyE::Phyperspank-luxABCDE spc) and CF205 (gerT{Delta}::erm amyE::Phyperspank-luxABCDE spc), respectively.

ß-Galactosidase assays. Cells were grown in hydrolyzed casein growth medium and induced to sporulate by transfer to Sterlini-Mandelstam sporulation medium as described previously (9, 31). One-milliliter aliquots of sporulating cells were harvested by centrifugation at intervals, and pellets were stored at –80°C until further analysis. ß-Galactosidase activity was measured as previously described (9).

Microscopy. Cells were induced to sporulate by growth in liquid Schaeffer's sporulation medium (27). The onset of sporulation was considered to be the last time point after the end of exponential phase. At various time points thereafter, cells were collected, immobilized using poly-L-lysine-treated coverslips, and observed by fluorescence microscopy as previously described (6).

Spore purification. Spores were prepared as described previously (8), with a few modifications. In brief, cells were induced to sporulate in 100 ml of Shaeffer's sporulation (DS) medium for 72 h at 37°C. Spores and other cells/cellular debris were collected by centrifugation and washed twice with distilled water. Next, the pellet was resuspended in 10 ml TE80 (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and 1 mg/ml lysozyme and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Sodium dodecyl sulfate was then added (2 ml of 10% stock), and incubation was continued for 20 min. The pellet was washed twice with 0.01% Tween 20 and twice with distilled water and finally stored in water at 4°C. All centrifugations were performed at 3,500 x g. Spore preparations routinely contained ≥95% phase-bright spores. All strains required for a single experiment were prepared together to ensure uniformity of growth and preparation conditions.

After the experiments shown in Fig. 3 were complete, it was observed that the spore preparation method described above had begun to yield preparations containing a significant proportion of phase-dark spores. Therefore, we wished to verify our results and continue with further experiments using spores prepared using a different method. In an alternative spore preparation protocol, cells are induced to sporulate on 2x SG medium agar (9) plates for 6 days at 37°C. Spores are then harvested from the plate surface and purified by sonication and repeated washes with cold water (9). Due to poor sporulation of PY79-derived strains on 2x SG agar, we built the required strains in the PS832 strain background, which sporulates efficiently on 2x SG. Spores purified from these new strains using the 2x SG method were used for the experiments shown in Fig. 4. In addition, the new strains were subjected to the loss-of-optical-density germination assay and yielded results virtually identical to those shown in Fig. 3A.


Figure 3
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 3. GerT is required for efficient germination. (A) Purified spores of the wild type (white boxes; strain PY79), from a gerT mutant (containing gerT{Delta}3) (gray boxes; strain CF164), and from a strain with a mutated gerT gene and containing a copy of wild-type gerT at the amyE locus (black boxes; strain CF167) were germinated with either L-alanine (left panel) or AGFK (right panel). Optical density at 600 nm (OD600) was measured as it decreased over time. (B) Wild-type (triangles; strain AHB83) and gerT mutant (squares; strain CF205) strains were induced to express the genes of the Photorhabdus luminescens luciferase operon during sporulation, and spores were purified. L-Alanine (black) or water (white) was then added to spore suspensions, and luciferase activity was monitored over time using a luminescence counter.

Assays for sporulation and germination. Sporulation efficiency and the heat resistance of spores were measured as the fraction of total CFU that survive incubation at 80°C for 20 min. Lysozyme resistance of spores was measured as the fraction of total CFU that survive lysozyme treatment (125 µg/ml) (9).

Tests for germination using 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride overlay were carried out as previously described on DS medium (9), with the exception that heat treatment was performed in a 65°C oven for 3 h.

Pure spore preparations were routinely heat activated at 80°C for 20 min prior to germination assays. Unless otherwise stated, germination of pure spore preparations was initiated by the addition of L-alanine at a final concentration of 10 mM. For germination in AGFK, D-glucose, D-fructose, KCl, and L-asparagine were added to a final concentration (each) of 10 mM. The standard germination assays for loss of optical density and dipicolinic acid (DPA) release during germination were performed as previously described (9). To assess spore germination in response to Ca2+-DPA, purified spores were tested for loss of heat resistance at various time points after the addition of 60 mM Ca2+-DPA (or 10 mM L-alanine as a control) (9).

To assay for luciferase activity during germination, the AHB83 (amyE:: Phyperspank-luxABCDE spc) and CF205 (gerT{Delta}::erm amyE::Phyperspank-luxABCDE spc) strains were induced to sporulate in DS medium supplemented with 1 mM isopropyl ß-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside, which induces expression of the Phyperspank promoter to high levels. Resulting spores were purified as described above. Spore suspensions were diluted to an optical density at 600 nm of 2 in 50 mM KPO4, pH 7.5, and the luciferase substrate decanal (Sigma) was added to a final concentration of 0.02%. This spore mixture was arrayed in a 96-well plate format, and germination was induced by addition of germinant to each well. Luminescence was read using a Perkin-Elmer TopCount NXT microplate scintillation and luminescence counter kept in a 30°C room. Readings were acquired with a 1-s integration time per well every 5 min for 7 h.


arrow
RESULTS
 
Discovery of a germination gene. During the course of systematically inactivating genes under the control of {sigma}K, we discovered that a deletion ({Delta}1) that eliminated most of the regulon member yojB resulted in the production of spores that were defective in germination (data not shown, but see below). Because the {Delta}1 mutation extended from 37 bp downstream of the start codon for yojB into the overlapping downstream open reading frame yojC (ending 27 bp upstream of the annotated stop codon for yojC), it was possible that either yojB or yojC (or both) was needed for proper germination (Fig. 1A) (18, 19). Next, we built a deletion ({Delta}2) that was fully contained within the yojB coding sequence and removed only the region of overlap between yojB and yojC. To our surprise, the {Delta}2 mutation caused no measurable defect in germination, a finding that suggested that neither open reading frame was needed for proper germination.


Figure 1
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 1. The gerT chromosomal region. (A) gerT is located in a convergent orientation with yojB and overlaps the hypothetical open reading frame yojC. Regions deleted in {Delta}1, {Delta}2, and {Delta}3 and the germination phenotypes of these deletion mutants are depicted. The black bar indicates the region used to complement gerT at the amyE locus. (B) The gerT coding gene and promoter regions are depicted. The putative –10 and –35 regions are boxed, and the consensus {sigma}K binding sequences and conserved spacing are shown above. Highly conserved residues are shown in large, bold letters. Perfect matches to the ideal ribosome binding site (RBS) are underlined. The boxed residues ATG and TAA are the projected start and stop codons for gerT. (C) The hypothetical yojC coding region is shown. Dotted underlining represents regions of overlap with the gerT and yojB coding sequences. Annotated start and stop codons are boxed.

Just downstream of, and in convergent orientation to, yojB is a third open reading frame, yozR, which also overlaps with yojC. The {Delta}1 mutation, which had caused a germination phenotype, but not {Delta}2 extended into the 3' region of yozR. To investigate whether inactivation of yozR was responsible for the germination phenotype, we built a third deletion ({Delta}3) that eliminated the 5' region of yozR but not the region of overlap between yozR and yojC. Spores produced by cells harboring {Delta}3 exhibited a germination defect similar to that observed with {Delta}1. We conclude from this that yozR (but evidently not yojB or yojC) is a germination gene. Finally, and in confirmation of this conclusion, the germination defect caused by either {Delta}1 or {Delta}3 was reversed in complementation experiments in which DNA that contained yozR and only the region of overlap with yojC was inserted into the chromosome at the amyE locus. The yozR gene is henceforth referred to as gerT.

In light of these findings and for the following additional reasons, we believe that yojC is not a functional open reading frame (Fig. 1C). First, all but 40 bp of the 231-bp coding sequence annotated as yojC overlaps either gerT or yojB (18, 19). Second, the region directly upstream of the annotated yojC start codon does not contain a sequence that significantly resembles a ribosome binding site for B. subtilis (16). Third, an in-frame fusion of the gene for green fluorescent protein (GFP) to the putative yojC coding sequence was not measurably expressed as judged by fluorescence microscopy.

In contrast to the case of yojC, the start codon for gerT is preceded at an appropriate distance by a sequence (AGAAAGGAtGTGA) that exhibits extensive complementarity to the 3' terminal region of 16S rRNA, being complementary at 12 out of 13 positions in a row (Fig. 1B) (16). Also, as presented below, in-frame fusions of the gene for ß-galactosidase or GFP to the gerT coding sequence were expressed, as judged by the production of ß-galactosidase activity and GFP, respectively. Thus, the gerT-yojB region of the chromosome likely consists of just two adjacent genes in convergent orientation.

gerT is under the control of {sigma}K and GerE. We wondered whether, like yojB, gerT is under the control of {sigma}K. A clue that gerT is under {sigma}K control came from the observation that approximately 30 bp upstream of the start codon is a partial match (tCACg, representing a three-out-of-five match [lowercase letters indicate deviation from the consensus]) to the consensus "–10" sequence (GCACA) and 15 bp further upstream is a perfect match (GCATATACTA) to the consensus "–35" sequence (GCATANNNTA) for promoters recognized by RNA polymerase containing {sigma}K (Fig. 1B) (5).

To investigate the expression and regulation of gerT, we created a translational fusion to lacZ in which the reporter gene was fused in-frame to the first six codons of gerT. The fusion included the putative promoter and ribosome binding site for gerT. The results in Fig. 2 show that the accumulation of ß-galactosidase from the translational fusion increased starting at about 4 h after the onset of sporulation (when {sigma}K is known to be active) and in a manner that was dependent upon {sigma}K.


Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 2. gerT is turned on late during sporulation under the control of {sigma}K and is repressed by GerE. Accumulation of ß-galactosidase was measured in strains harboring lacZ fused to the first six codons of gerT and upstream regulatory regions. Samples were collected at the indicated times after suspension of growing cultures in Sterlini-Mandelstam medium. Expression of gerT-lacZ was monitored in the wild type (gray boxes; strain CF174) and in spoIVCB (part of the coding gene for {sigma}K; black boxes; strain CF183) and gerE (white boxes; strain CF184) mutant cells.

Among the genes turned on by {sigma}K is gerE, which encodes a DNA-binding protein that is required for the activation of a subset of genes in the {sigma}K regulon and up-regulates or down-regulates many other genes under {sigma}K control (5). We therefore wondered whether the expression of gerT was influenced by GerE. The results show that in a mutant lacking gerE, ß-galactosidase expressed from the gerT promoter accumulated starting at 4 h of sporulation, as in the wild type, but increased to a level three times as high as the wild-type level by 6 h of sporulation. Therefore, gerT expression is under the negative control of GerE.

gerT is a germination gene. Spores from a gerT mutant (containing gerT{Delta}3) exhibited no measurable defect in heat resistance or in resistance to treatment with lysozyme. In addition, the mutant spores appeared normal under phase-contrast microscopy (data not shown). However, purified spores of the gerT mutant were impaired in their ability to reduce 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride, which is diagnostic of a defect in germination (data not shown).

To further investigate the gerT germination defect, we tested purifed spores in an assay for loss of optical density at 600 nm (Fig. 3A, left panel). Wild-type spores have a relatively dehydrated core and are phase bright but darken as they germinate and rehydrate. As this occurs, a suspension of spores loses optical density. We observed that wild-type spores lost about 50 to 60% of their optical density within 90 min of the addition of the germinant L-alanine. The majority of this decrease occurred within 30 min after the addition of germinant. In contrast, gerT spores lost a maximum of 25% of their optical density during germination. When observed under the microscope at the end of incubation with germinant, most wild-type spores had turned phase dark. However, only about one in three gerT spores was phase dark, while the rest remained phase bright. As noted earlier, when a wild-type copy of gerT was present at the amyE locus, the germination defect of cells harboring the gerT{Delta}3 mutation was repaired.

When plated on solid LB medium, the gerT mutant spores yielded approximately as many colonies as did wild-type spores. Yet under the conditions used for Fig. 3, mutant spores were impaired in the loss of optical density and only 30% of the spores turned phase dark. We have no explanation for this apparent contradiction. Evidently, the mutant spores can eventually germinate with high efficiency on solid LB medium.

As another test of germination, we sought to measure the ability of gerT mutant spores to reactivate luciferase enzyme that had been packaged into the spore during sporulation upon exposure to germinant. To this end, we purified wild-type and gerT mutant spores engineered to contain the bacterial enzyme luciferase, which is known to be inactive in the dormant spore and to rapidly reactivate as germination occurs (10). More specifically, we cloned the Photorhabdus luminescens luciferase operon downstream of an inducible promoter and inserted this construct into the amyE locus in wild-type and gerT mutant cells. The operon encodes luciferase and contains genes responsible for the production of the luciferase cofactor reduced riboflavin phosphate. The resulting strains were sporulated in the presence of the inducer, thereby permitting incorporation of luciferase into the developing forespore. (While luciferase was also produced in the mother cell during sporulation of these strains, this pool of enzyme was likely eliminated during the stringent spore purification procedure. Furthermore, any possible residual luciferase associated with the exterior of purified spores would have been inactive due to the absence of the reduced riboflavin phosphate cofactor.) For wild-type spores that had been induced to produce luciferase during sporulation, we found that luciferase activity began almost immediately upon the addition of germinant and peaked at about 1 h postaddition (Fig. 3B). The activity then decreased rapidly until about 2.5 h after addition, finally tapering off over the next several hours. In contrast, gerT spores that had been similarly induced to produce luciferase exhibited a much less dramatic peak of activity, reaching a maximum at about half the height of the wild-type peak at about 2 h after addition of germinant and tapering off slowly for the remainder of the experiment. Surprisingly, gerT mutant spores exhibited some luciferase activity even when L-alanine was not added (about half the level of activity of spores that had been induced to germinate). The cause of this activity is unknown, and germination without the addition of germinant was not seen in the wild type in this assay or with gerT spores in other types of germination assays.

Spores with mutations in certain germination genes, such as the operon encoding the gerA receptor for L-alanine, are defective in response to one germinant but can germinate normally in response to another nutrient germinant (17). To see if this was true for gerT, we tested mutant spores for the loss of optical density after addition of the nutrient germinant cocktail AGFK (containing L-asparagine, D-glucose, D-fructose, and potassium) (Fig. 3A, right panel). Wild-type spores again lost approximately 60% of their optical density within 90 min of germinant addition. gerT mutant spores did not respond efficiently to the germinant, again losing only 20% of their optical density over the course of the assay. Thus, gerT spores are defective in responding to either L-alanine or AGFK, and hence the germination defect is not germinant specific.

gerT is needed early in germination. The process of germination can be divided into three stages. The first stage, germination I, begins when nutrient germinant binds to its cognate germinant receptor in the inner membrane of the spore. This triggers the release of ions and DPA from the spore core; DPA, in a chelate with calcium, composes up to 10% of the dry weight of the spore. At this stage, at least some of the spore's heat resistance is also lost. As Ca2+-DPA and ions are excreted, some water comes into the core; but the core does not expand due to the peptidoglycan cortex that forms a shell between the inner and outer membranes surrounding the core. Germination II requires activation of the cortex lytic enzymes (CLEs) that degrade the cortex to allow full hydration and expansion of the core. This hydration appears to be associated with the loss of phase brightness (and optical density) that occurs during this stage. Finally, metabolism, cell division, and DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis begin during the final stage of germination, outgrowth (20, 28).

The defects displayed by gerT spores in the assay for loss of optical density (which tests for loss of phase brightness) and the tetrazolium overlay assay (which tests for renewed metabolism) suggest that the mutant is impaired at germination I or II. In addition, it has been shown that luciferase activity in the assay described above does not commence until at least some cortex hydrolysis has begun (perhaps due to a lack of core water during germination I) (28); as such, the inability of gerT mutant spores to fully reactivate luciferase also indicates a block at germination II or earlier. To test whether gerT spores are impaired at germination I, we measured the release of DPA from gerT spores during germination (Fig. 4A). Wild-type spores released 80 to 90% of their depot of DPA within 60 min after addition of germinant. In contrast, gerT spores released only about 30% of their core DPA even after 2 h of germination. Thus, it seems that gerT spores are impaired at the earliest stage of germination.

Other mutant strains that are blocked in the initiation of germination I can be rescued for germination by the nonnutrient germinant Ca2+-DPA (22). In wild-type spores, it is thought that the release of endogenous Ca2+-DPA during germination I triggers activation of the CLE CwlJ. This CLE can be artificially activated when Ca2+-DPA is added as an exogenous germinant, allowing the spore to bypass the events of germination I and to initiate degradation of the cortex and the events of germination II (21). gerA spores, which are mutant for the L-alanine receptor, are unable to germinate in response to L-alanine (Fig. 4B, left panel) (22). However, they germinate normally when Ca2+-DPA is added. To test whether the gerT defect could be similarly bypassed, we added either L-alanine or Ca2+-DPA to spores and observed the loss of heat resistance that occurs during germination. In L-alanine, wild-type spores lost 80 to 90% of their heat resistance within 60 min of germinant addition. gerT spores lost only about 40% of their resistance in the same amount of time (Fig. 4B, right panel). When Ca2+-DPA was used as the germinant, wild-type germination improved, allowing close to 100% loss of resistance. Surprisingly, we observed that gerT spores lost only 30 to 40% of resistance in response to Ca2+-DPA as a germinant. Thus, it appears that gerT spores are impaired in progressing through germination I, but the defect caused by the gerT mutation cannot be rescued with Ca2+-DPA. This could indicate that GerT is required independently for both germination I and II or that the passage of small molecules through the coat (i.e., germinants and Ca2+-DPA) is impaired in the absence of GerT.

Subcellular localization of GerT. In light of its role in germination and its synthesis in the mother cell, we wondered whether GerT is a component of the spore coat, the protective proteinaceous layer that surrounds the outer membrane of the spore. To investigate this, we created a strain bearing a functional, in-frame fusion of the coding sequence for GerT to that of GFP. As seen in Fig. 5C, GerT-GFP localized in an oval pattern around the outside of the mature spore, a localization pattern similar to that of known coat proteins (36). Proper localization of all known coat proteins is dependent on SpoIVA, a protein that composes the basement layer of the spore coat (26). In a spoIVA mutant, GerT-GFP did not localize to the forespore, and in fact little if any GFP fluorescence was observed during sporulation (data not shown). It therefore seems likely that GerT is a coat protein, and we surmise that the GerT-GFP fusion is unstable in the absence of proper, SpoIVA-directed coat assembly.


Figure 5
View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 5. GerT-GFP localizes to the coat in a two-step process. Wild-type (A to F; strain CF172) and cotE mutant cells (G to L; strain CF177) harboring gerT-gfp were grown in Difco sporulation medium. The cells were visualized by phase-contrast microscopy (PC), and localization of GerT-GFP was visualized by fluorescence microscopy at the indicated times after the start of sporulation. White arrowheads in panels I and L indicate spores that have been released from the mother cells.

The coat is composed of two primary layers, the inner and outer coat. Formation of the outer coat is dependent on the coat morphogenetic protein CotE, while the inner coat forms independently of this protein (39). To determine whether GerT is a part of the inner or outer coat, we introduced the GerT-GFP fusion into a strain with a mutation in cotE. Surprisingly, GerT-GFP localization to the spore coat showed a partial, but not complete, dependence on CotE. Rather than localizing in a ring around the forespore in the absence of CotE, as would be expected for an inner coat protein, or being diffuse in the mother cell, as expected for an outer coat protein, GerT-GFP formed bright foci associated with the forespore as spores developed (Fig. 5G to I). However, when spores were finally released from the mother cell, the GFP fluorescence associated with the spores could no longer be observed (Fig. 5I). Therefore, it appears that CotE is required for the proper pattern of GerT localization during sporulation.

Upon close observation of fields of sporulating wild-type cells bearing the GerT-GFP fusion, it was possible to observe the occasional individual sporangium with a pattern of GFP foci around the forespore similar to that seen in the cotE mutant. In each case, these sporangia appeared to be at an earlier stage of sporulation than the neighboring cells, as the forespores appeared slightly less phase bright. To investigate whether these foci represent a normal stage in GerT localization as development progresses, we observed GerT-GFP localization over time. As seen in Fig. 5A, most wild-type cells had foci of GFP associated with the forespore after 7 h of sporulation. By 10 and 24 h of sporulation, however, GerT-GFP had spread out into a ring in most cells, surrounding the forespore roughly evenly (Fig. 5B and C). In contrast, GerT-GFP localized as forespore-associated foci in cotE mutant sporangia throughout sporulation, the immature spores losing their associated green fluorescence only after mother-cell lysis (Fig. 5G to I). Therefore, it appears that GerT is incorporated into the coat in a two-step process. The germination protein first assembles into foci associated with the forespore in a manner independent of CotE. Next, in a second step that depends on CotE, GerT molecules spread around the developing spore to form a stable contiguous shell.


arrow
DISCUSSION
 
We have discovered an additional member of the {sigma}K regulon and have shown that it is involved in the process of germination. The gerT gene was missed in previous studies of the regulon (5, 30), which consists of approximately 89 single-gene and multigene transcription units. We note that gerT is weakly expressed, and hence it might not have been detected in the transcriptional profiling analysis of Steil et al. (30). In the case of Eichenberger et al. (5), the oligonucleotide spot on the microarray corresponding to gerT was missing due to a printing error. Nevertheless, the identification of gerT as an additional regulon member reinforces the possibility that the current list of sporulation-controlled genes is not complete (35). A subset of {sigma}K-controlled genes is additionally subject to repression by the DNA-binding protein GerE, whose synthesis is itself under {sigma}K control (5, 35). This kind of regulatory circuit is known as an incoherent feed-forward loop and is believed to cause genes to be expressed in a pulse (15). We therefore surmise that gerT is switched on by {sigma}K and then switched off as GerE accumulates.

Multiple lines of evidence indicated that GerT plays a role in germination. Among these were the following: (i) impaired response to two different nutrient germinants (L-alanine and the cocktail AGFK) and the nonnutrient germinant Ca2+-DPA, which activates the cortex lytic enzyme CwlJ (21); (ii) impaired reduction of the chromogenic dye 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride; (iii) impaired loss of optical density; (iv) impaired activation of luciferase that had been packaged into spores; and (v) impaired release of Ca2+-DPA. Impaired release of Ca2+-DPA is usually diagnostic of a block at germination I. Interestingly, unlike the germination-I-blocked mutant gerA, which is rescued by the addition of Ca2+-DPA, addition of this compound to gerT mutant spores did not restore efficient germination.

The use of a functional, in-frame fusion of GerT to GFP revealed that the germination protein is a component of the spore coat. The coat is a complex macromolecular structure that is composed of 50 or more proteins (11). Interestingly, coat proteins exhibit dynamic patterns of subcellular localization (33). For example, the coat protein YutH (as visualized with a GFP fusion) initially forms a focus, which then grows into a ring. The ring, in turn, expands into a cap that spreads around the developing spore. As we have seen, GerT-GFP also forms foci that grow into a shell that surrounds the entire forespore. Interestingly, the spreading step is dependent on the coat protein CotE, which is needed for the assembly of the outer layer of the coat. Perhaps CotE or some outer coat protein whose localization depends on CotE forms a platform that allows the focus of GerT to spread into a shell.

Although many coat proteins are dispensable for spore formation, a significant number of coat proteins are needed for proper germination (1, 21, 25, 29). For example, the hexagenic gerP operon is believed to encode coat components (or proteins needed for proper coat assembly) that allow small-molecule germinants to pass through the coat and reach the germination receptors located in the membrane beneath it (17). Interestingly, like gerT, gerP is under the positive control of {sigma}K and the negative control of GerE (1). Hence, both transcription units are likely to exhibit a pulse of expression at a similar time late in sporulation. Conceivably, GerT and the GerP proteins contribute to a common feature of the coat that allows it to be permeable to small molecules.

In summary, we have identified an additional gene involved in germination. The gerT gene encodes a component of the coat that is produced under the positive control of {sigma}K and the negative control of GerE. GerT is incorporated into the coat in a dynamic, two-step process that depends on the morphogenetic protein CotE. GerT seems to be needed at the earliest stage (I) of germination.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank P. Eichenberger, D. Kearns, K. Ramamurthi, C. Ellermeier, P. Setlow, and K. Ragkousi for helpful discussions and assistance. We also thank P. Yeh and the Kishony lab for the use of their Topcount luminescence counter and P. Hill for the gift of the optimized luciferase operon.

This work was supported by a Helen Hay Whitney postdoctoral fellowship to A.H.C. and NIH grant GM18568 to R.L.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138. Phone: (617) 495-4905. Fax: (617) 496-4642. E-mail: losick{at}mcb.harvard.edu Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 24 August 2007. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Behravan, J., H. Chirakkal, A. Masson, and A. Moir. 2000. Mutations in the gerP locus of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus cereus affect access of germinants to their targets in spores. J. Bacteriol. 182:1987-1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Driks, A. 2002. Proteins of the spore core and coat, p. 527-536. In A. L. Sonenshein, J. A. Hoch, and R. Losick (ed.), Bacillus subtilis and its closest relatives: from genes to cells. ASM PRESS, Washington, DC.
    3. 3
  3. Driks, A., S. Roels, B. Beall, C. P. Moran, Jr., and R. Losick. 1994. Subcellular localization of proteins involved in the assembly of the spore coat of Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev. 8:234-244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Driks, A., and P. Setlow. 2000. Morphogenesis and properties of the bacterial spore, p. 191-218. In Y. V. Brun and L. J. Shimkets, (ed.), Prokaryotic development. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
    5. 5
  5. Eichenberger, P., M. Fujita, S. T. Jensen, E. M. Conlon, D. Z. Rudner, S. T. Wang, C. Ferguson, K. Haga, T. Sato, J. S. Liu, and R. Losick. 2004. The program of gene transcription for a single differentiating cell type during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. PLoS Biol. 2:e328.[CrossRef][Medline]
    6. 6
  6. Fujita, M., and R. Losick. 2002. An investigation into the compartmentalization of the sporulation transcription factor sigmaE in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 43:27-38.[CrossRef][Medline]
    7. 7
  7. Guerout-Fleury, A. M., N. Frandsen, and P. Stragier. 1996. Plasmids for ectopic integration in Bacillus subtilis. Gene 180:57-61.[CrossRef][Medline]
    8. 8
  8. Hamoen, L. W., and J. Errington. 2003. Polar targeting of DivIVA in Bacillus subtilis is not directly dependent on FtsZ or PBP 2B. J. Bacteriol. 185:693-697.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Harwood, C. R., and S. M. Cutting. 1990. Molecular biological methods for Bacillus. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
    10. 10
  10. Hill, P. J., L. Hall, D. A. Vinicombe, C. J. Soper, P. Setlow, W. M. Waites, S. Denyer, and G. S. Stewart. 1994. Bioluminescence and spores as biological indicators of inimical processes. Soc. Appl. Bacteriol. Symp. Ser. 23:129S-134S.[Medline]
    11. 11
  11. Kim, H., M. Hahn, P. Grabowski, D. C. McPherson, M. M. Otte, R. Wang, C. C. Ferguson, P. Eichenberger, and A. Driks. 2006. The Bacillus subtilis spore coat protein interaction network. Mol. Microbiol. 59:487-502.[CrossRef][Medline]
    12. 12
  12. Kuwana, R., Y. Kasahara, M. Fujibayashi, H. Takamatsu, N. Ogasawara, and K. Watabe. 2002. Proteomics characterization of novel spore proteins of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology 148:3971-3982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Lai, E. M., N. D. Phadke, M. T. Kachman, R. Giorno, S. Vazquez, J. A. Vazquez, J. R. Maddock, and A. Driks. 2003. Proteomic analysis of the spore coats of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus anthracis. J. Bacteriol. 185:1443-1454.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 14
  14. Losick, R., P. Youngman, and P. J. Piggot. 1986. Genetics of endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 20:625-669.[CrossRef][Medline]
    15. 15
  15. Mangan, S., and U. Alon. 2003. Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:11980-11985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 16
  16. McLaughlin, J. R., C. L. Murray, and J. C. Rabinowitz. 1981. Unique features in the ribosome binding site sequence of the gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus beta-lactamase gene. J. Biol. Chem. 256:11283-11291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    17. 17
  17. Moir, A., E. Lafferty, and D. A. Smith. 1979. Genetics analysis of spore germination mutants of Bacillus subtilis 168: the correlation of phenotype with map location. J. Gen. Microbiol. 111:165-180.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. Moszer, I. 1998. The complete genome of Bacillus subtilis: from sequence annotation to data management and analysis. FEBS Lett. 430:28-36.[CrossRef][Medline]
    19. 19
  19. Moszer, I., P. Glaser, and A. Danchin. 1995. SubtiList: a relational database for the Bacillus subtilis genome. Microbiology 141:261-268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    20. 20
  20. Paidhungat, M., and P. Setlow. 2002. Spore germination and outgrowth, p. 537-548. In A. L. Sonenshein, J. A. Hoch, and R. Losick (ed.), Bacillus subtilis and its closest relatives: from genes to cells. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
    21. 21
  21. Paidhungat, M., K. Ragkousi, and P. Setlow. 2001. Genetic requirements for induction of germination of spores of Bacillus subtilis by Ca2+-dipicolinate. J. Bacteriol. 183:4886-4893.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    22. 22
  22. Paidhungat, M., and P. Setlow. 2000. Role of Ger proteins in nutrient and nonnutrient triggering of spore germination in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 182:2513-2519.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    23. 23
  23. Piggot, P. J., and J. G. Coote. 1976. Genetic aspects of bacterial endospore formation. Bacteriol. Rev. 40:908-962.[Free Full Text]
    24. 24
  24. Qazi, S. N., E. Counil, J. Morrissey, C. E. Rees, A. Cockayne, K. Winzer, W. C. Chan, P. Williams, and P. J. Hill. 2001. agr expression precedes escape of internalized Staphylococcus aureus from the host endosome. Infect. Immun. 69:7074-7082.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    25. 25
  25. Ragkousi, K., P. Eichenberger, C. van Ooij, and P. Setlow. 2003. Identification of a new gene essential for germination of Bacillus subtilis spores with Ca2+-dipicolinate. J. Bacteriol. 185:2315-2329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    26. 26
  26. Roels, S., A. Driks, and R. Losick. 1992. Characterization of spoIVA, a sporulation gene involved in coat morphogenesis in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 174:575-585.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    27. 27
  27. Schaeffer, P., J. Millet, and J. P. Aubert. 1965. Catabolic repression of bacterial sporulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 54:704-711.[Free Full Text]
    28. 28
  28. Setlow, B., E. Melly, and P. Setlow. 2001. Properties of spores of Bacillus subtilis blocked at an intermediate stage in spore germination. J. Bacteriol. 183:4894-4899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    29. 29
  29. Setlow, P. 2003. Spore germination. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6:550-556.[CrossRef][Medline]
    30. 30
  30. Steil, L., M. Serrano, A. O. Henriques, and U. Volker. 2005. Genome-wide analysis of temporally regulated and compartment-specific gene expression in sporulating cells of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology 151:399-420.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    31. 31
  31. Sterlini, J. M., and J. Mandelstam. 1969. Commitment to sporulation in Bacillus subtilis and its relationship to development of actinomycin resistance. Biochem. J. 113:29-37.[Medline]
    32. 32
  32. Stragier, P., and R. Losick. 1996. Molecular genetics of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 30:297-341.[CrossRef][Medline]
    33. 33
  33. van Ooij, C., P. Eichenberger, and R. Losick. 2004. Dynamic patterns of subcellular protein localization during spore coat morphogenesis in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 186:4441-4448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    34. 34
  34. Wach, A. 1996. PCR-synthesis of marker cassettes with long flanking homology regions for gene disruptions in S. cerevisiae. Yeast 12:259-265.[CrossRef][Medline]
    35. 35
  35. Wang, S. T., B. Setlow, E. M. Conlon, J. L. Lyon, D. Imamura, T. Sato, P. Setlow, R. Losick, and P. Eichenberger. 2006. The forespore line of gene expression in Bacillus subtilis. J. Mol. Biol. 358:16-37.[CrossRef][Medline]
    36. 36
  36. Webb, C. D., A. Decatur, A. Teleman, and R. Losick. 1995. Use of green fluorescent protein for visualization of cell-specific gene expression and subcellular protein localization during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 177:5906-5911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    37. 37
  37. Wilson, G. A., and K. F. Bott. 1968. Nutritional factors influencing the development of competence in the Bacillus subtilis transformation system. J. Bacteriol. 95:1439-1449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    38. 38
  38. Youngman, P., J. B. Perkins, and R. Losick. 1984. Construction of a cloning site near one end of Tn917 into which foreign DNA may be inserted without affecting transposition in Bacillus subtilis or expression of the transposon-borne erm gene. Plasmid 12:1-9.[CrossRef][Medline]
    39. 39
  39. Zheng, L. B., W. P. Donovan, P. C. Fitz-James, and R. Losick. 1988. Gene encoding a morphogenic protein required in the assembly of the outer coat of the Bacillus subtilis endospore. Genes Dev. 2:1047-1054.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Bacteriology, November 2007, p. 7681-7689, Vol. 189, No. 21
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.01053-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Senior, A., Moir, A. (2008). The Bacillus cereus GerN and GerT Protein Homologs Have Distinct Roles in Spore Germination and Outgrowth, Respectively. J. Bacteriol. 190: 6148-6152 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Losick, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Losick, R.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»