Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Supplemental material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Willett, J. Articles by Bauer, C. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Willett, J. Articles by Bauer, C. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, November 2007, p. 7765-7773, Vol. 189, No. 21
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00853-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

RegA Control of Bacteriochlorophyll and Carotenoid Synthesis in Rhodobacter capsulatus ^,

Jonathan Willett,¹ James L. Smart,² and Carl E. Bauer^1*

Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405,¹ Department of Biology, University of Tennessee at Martin, Martin, Tennessee 38237²

Received 1 June 2007/ Accepted 29 June 2007

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
We provide in vivo genetic and in vitro biochemical evidence that RegA directly regulates bacteriochlorophyll and carotenoid biosynthesis in Rhodobacter capsulatus. ß-Galactosidase expression assays with a RegA-disrupted strain containing reporter plasmids for Mg-protoporphyrin IX monomethyl ester oxidative cyclase (bchE), Mg-protoporphyrin IX chelatase (bchD), and phytoene dehydrogenase (crtI) demonstrate RegA is responsible for fourfold anaerobic induction of bchE, threefold induction of bchD, and twofold induction of crtI. Promoter mapping studies, coupled with DNase I protection assays, map the region of RegA binding to three sites in the bchE promoter region. Similar studies at the crtA and crtI promoters indicate that RegA binds to a single region equidistant from these divergent promoters. These results demonstrate that RegA is directly responsible for anaerobic induction of bacteriochlorophyll biosynthesis genes bchE, bchD, bchJ, bchI, bchG, and bchP and carotenoid biosynthesis genes crtI, crtB, and crtA.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Studies have shown that anaerobic induction of numerous photosystem, cytochrome, respiratory, and tetrapyrrole biosynthesis genes in Rhodobacter capsulatus involves coordinate regulation by several transcription factors (5, 6, 7). The two-component sensor kinase-response regulator pair RegB-RegA (15, 20, 26) is involved in controlling anaerobic and aerobic expression of many cellular processes, including the synthesis of heme (encoded by hem genes) (27) and cytochrome apoproteins that bind heme as a cofactor (30, 31). Thus, RegB-RegA are partially responsible for controlling the stoichiometry of heme synthesis by regulating the expression of heme binding apoproteins. With regard to photosystem expression, RegB-RegA are known to control high-level anaerobic expression of light harvesting I, light harvesting II, and reaction center apoproteins encoded by the puc, puf, and puh operons (20, 26). However, direct involvement of RegB or RegA in controlling expression of bacteriochlorophyll and carotenoid photosystem pigments has not been firmly established. There is evidence from a microarray expression study that expression levels of numerous bacteriochlorophyll and carotenoid biosynthesis genes are reduced in a strain of Rhodobacter sphaeroides disrupted for a RegB-RegA homolog called PrrB-PrrA (17, 21). Putative RegA binding sites have also been tentatively identified within the bch and crt gene clusters by predictive hierarchical clustering analysis of the R. sphaeroides genome (18). There is also a transient reduction in bchC expression upon a shift to anaerobic conditions in a regA-disrupted strain of R. capsulatus (1). However, direct binding of RegA to bacteriochlorophyll and carotenoid promoter regions has not been previously established.

In this study we constructed and assayed the expression pattern of a reporter plasmid for the large bchEJG-orf428-bchP-idi operon, which encodes numerous enzymes in bacteriochlorophyll a biosynthesis (2, 10, 12, 29) and an enzyme involved in carotenoid biosynthesis (16). Analysis of the bchE expression patterns in wild-type strain SB1003 and in a RegA-disrupted strain of R. capsulatus indicate that the bchEJG-orf428-bchP-idi operon is indeed transcriptionally regulated by RegA.

In addition, we investigated the expression pattern of two divergent carotenoid biosynthesis promoters, crtA and crtI. The crtA-bchIDO operon is responsible for expressing spheroidene monooxygenase (crtA), an enzyme in the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway, and two subunits of Mg-chelatase (BchD and BchI), the first biosynthetic enzyme in the bacteriochlorophyll branch of the tetrapyrrole pathway (2). Divergently transcribed from the crtA-bchIDO operon is the crtIBK operon, which is responsible for expression of phytoene dehydrogenase (crtI) and phytoene synthase (crtB) (2, 3), which are the first committed enzymes in the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway. Analysis of the divergent crtA-bchIDO and crtIBK operons indicates they are coregulated by RegA, thereby providing a mechanism of coordinating bacteriochlorophyll a and spheroidenone biosynthesis.

DNase I protection analysis was performed using the constituently active variant of RegA called RegA* (13) to identify binding sites of RegA to the bchE, crtA, and crtI promoters. The transcriptional start site of bchE was also mapped by primer extension analysis to delineate the location of RegA binding relative to the location of promoter recognition sequences. These results provide new insights into the mechanism of regulating the synthesis of pigmented and electron carrier components of the photosystem in R. capsulatus.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Bacterial strains and growth conditions. The parent R. capsulatus strain SB1003 (33) and the regA-disrupted strain MS01 (26) were grown aerobically and photosynthetically at 34°C in PYS medium (34). Escherichia coli strain DH5 was grown aerobically in LB medium (24). Antibiotic concentrations used for E. coli were 200 µg/ml for ampicillin and 50 µg/ml for kanamycin, trimethoprim, and spectinomycin. Spectinomycin and kanamycin were both used for R. capsulatus at 10 µg/ml, while rifampin was used at 50 µg/ml.

Plasmid construction. Construction of a bchE::lacZ reporter plasmid involved PCR amplification of a 1.3-kb fragment using primers bchESalI (5'-GCCGCAGTCGTAGTTGTTCA-3') and bchEEcoRI (5'-CCGAATTCGGCCTGTTGTCGAAGGA-3') and standard procedures. The downstream bchESalI primer was designed such that it created an in-frame translational fusion of codon 242 of bchE to the lacZ reporter gene. The PCR-amplified fragment was digested with EcoRI and SalI and ligated into similarly digested pNM482 (19) and then transformed into DH5. An EcoRI-digested spectinomycin-resistant omega cassette (23) was then introduced into the EcoRI site to produced the final bchE::lacZ reporter construct pJW10. The DNA sequence of the PCR-amplified fragment was confirmed by DNA sequence analysis.

Reporter plamids pCrtI::Z and pBchD::Z used to determine the expression patterns of crtI and bchD, respectively, were previously described (22).

ß-Galactosidase activity assays. Aerobic cultures used for determining ß-galactosidase activity were grown in the dark as a 17-ml culture in a 250-ml flask that was shaken at 300 rpm. Photosynthetic cultures were grown in 15-ml screw-cap tubes that were completely filled and illuminated with a 60-W tungsten bulb at 34°C as described by Young et al. (34). Inocula were from overnight cultures that were diluted 500-fold prior to incubation. Both aerobic and anaerobic photosynthetic cultures were grown to a cell density of 75 Klett units, chilled in an ice water bath, and harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. Strains were disrupted by sonication and assayed for activity as described previously (34). ß-Galactosidase activities reported represent averages of duplicate measurements of triplicate cultures, with error bars representing standard deviations. Units represent nanomoles of orthonitrophenyl-ß-D-galactoside (ONPG) hydrolyzed per minute per milligram of cellular protein (20).

Primer extension analysis. Total RNA was isolated from log-phase cultures of R. capsulatus strain SB1003 grown photosynthetically in PYS medium. RNA was prepared from six preps containing 3 ml of culture each. Total RNA was isolated using an RNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN) and resuspended in RNase-free water to a final concentration of 3 mg/ml.

A commercially synthesized primer (5'-GCCGGAGTGGTAATTGGGG-3') was prepared complementary to the predicted mRNA transcript coding for the bchE gene. 5' ³²P labeling of the primer was carried out at 37°C for 1 hour in a 10-µl reaction mixture containing 50 pmol primer, 1x phage T4 kinase buffer (New England Biolabs), 10 units of phage T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs), and 500 µCi of [-³²P]ATP (specific activity, 7,000 Ci/mmol; ICN Biomedicals). The enzyme was inactivated by heat treatment for 10 minutes at 80°C. Labeled primer was purified using QIAquick spin columns (QIAGEN) and resuspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA buffer to a final concentration of 2 pmol/µl.

5'-³²P-labeled primer was annealed to target RNA in a 10-µl reaction volume comprised of 15 µg cellular RNA, 2.5 µl of ³²P-labeled primer, 10 mM Tris-acetate (pH 7.4), 60 mM NH₄Cl. The annealing reaction mixture was heated to 80°C for 10 minutes and then cooled slowly to 40°C and incubated at 40°C for a further 20 minutes. A 10-µl volume of premixed extension mix comprised of 20 mM Tris-acetate (pH 7.4), 20 mM magnesium acetate, 120 mM NH₄Cl, 80 µg/ml actinomycin D, 50 mM dithiothreitol, 750 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, and 10 units of murine leukemia virus SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) was added to the annealing reaction mixture and incubated at 42°C for 2 hours. Unreacted primer and salt were then removed from the reaction mixture by using DyeExII spin columns (QIAGEN). Primer extension products were mixed with 10 µl of 3x formamide loading dye comprised of 20 mM EDTA, 0.05% (wt/vol) bromophenol blue, 0.05% (wt/vol) xylene cyanole in deionized formamide. A dideoxy sequencing ladder was generated from the same labeled primers by using the Sequitherm EXCEL II sequencing kit (Epicenter). Sequence ladders and primer extension products were heated to 95°C for 5 minutes and then placed on ice for 10 minutes prior to gel electrophoresis in an 8 M urea, 0.5x Tris-acetate EDTA, 6% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gel.

DNase I footprint analysis. RegA* was purified as previously published (13). Amplification of the crtI and bchD promoter region using PCR was performed using fluorescently labeled primers, with either the top or bottom strand amplification primers labeled with 6-carboxyfluorescein phosphoramidate (FAM) (25, 32). The crtI and bchD promoter regions were amplified using primers crtI/AForward (5'-CGCATCGCTGCAGCAAGAC-3') and crtI/AReverse (5'-GGACAGGATCATCTGGCTGAT-3'). Amplification of the top and bottom fluorescently labeled bchE promoter region was with primers bchEfootForward (5'-CCATGCCTGATTCACCTTTG-3') and bchEfootReverse (5'-GCCGGAGTGGTAATTGGG-3').

Individual footprint reactions were initiated in a 10-µl binding reaction mixture that contained 2 µl 5x footprint binding buffer composed of 125 mM HEPES (pH 7.8), 50 mM K-acetate (pH 8), 25 mM Mg-acetate, 10 mM CaCl₂, 5 mM dithiothreitol, and 125 µg/ml bovine serum albumin (31), 1 pM of FAM-labeled probe, and water to a final volume of 10 µl. The binding reaction mixture was added to a 10-µl protein solution composed of 1x footprint binding buffer (13) and various amounts of RegA*. Initial binding reaction mixtures were incubated for 30 min at 22°C followed by a 5-min DNase I digestion that was initiated by adding 2 µl of New England Biolabs DNase I at an approximately 1:6,000 dilution in 1x footprint binding buffer, which gave partial probe digestion. The digestion reactions were then stopped by adding 40 µl 0.5 M EDTA. DNA segments were purified using QIAGEN PCR cleanup columns using the manufacturer's recommended protocol and were concentrated in a Speed-Vac to a final volume of 10 µl, to which 10 µl of Sigma HiDi formamide was added. Samples were then transferred to a 96-well plate containing 0.5 µl of Applied Biosystems 500-LIZ size standards in each well (25, 32). The plate was then sealed using a septum, heated to 95°C for 5 min, and cooled quickly on ice. Fragment analysis was performed on an Applied Biosystems 3730 automated DNA sequencing machine with fragments detected using the GeneMapper-Generic protocol. Samples were analyzed using SoftGenetics GeneMarker 1.4 analysis software.

Sequencing ladders for use in defining a precise region of DNase I protection were generated using a Fermentas Life Sciences CycleReader DNA sequencing kit. The ladders were set up according to the manufacturer's protocol, with the exception that 6-FAM primers were used instead of radiolabeled primers. For template, 100 fmol of PCR product was used that was generated using the primers bchEfootForward and bchEfootReverse without the 6-FAM label.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
RegA regulation of photopigment genes. Previous studies from our laboratory demonstrated that regB and regA null mutations had no effect on expression of the bacteriochlorophyll bchH or bchC promoters (20, 26). These findings, however, do not reflect the phenotypes of regB and regA null mutations that are known to be severely hampered in their ability to synthesize both bacteriochlorophyll and carotenoids (20, 26). In order to reconcile these differences, we constructed a translational fusion to the bchE promoter that drives expression of four enzymes involved in the Mg-tetrapyrrole branch of the bacteriochlorophyll biosynthesis pathway (Fig. 1). This reporter was assayed for expression in the wild type and in regA-disrupted strains of R. capsulatus. The results of ß-galactosidase activity assays in Fig. 2 show that bchE::lacZ expression is between four- and fivefold higher in the parent strain, SB1003, when grown under steady-state anaerobic photosynthetic conditions than when grown under dark aerobic conditions. In contrast, there was no significant increase in expression of bchE::lacZ when the regA-disrupted strain, MS01, was grown under anaerobic photosynthetic conditions.

View larger version (32K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Organization of the bchEJG-orf428-bchP-idi, crtA-bchIDO, and crtIBK operons. Large open arrows indicate genes with names of individual loci below. Thin solid arrows indicate transcripts. Putative functions of bch, crt, and idi genes have been studied elsewhere (4, 10, 11, 12). The crtA-crtI promoter region was defined by Elsen et al. (14), and the bchE promoter is as shown below in Fig. 3. The lengths of the transcripts are putative based on the absence of termination sites in the studied region (2).

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. ß-Galactosidase assay of bchE, crtI, and bchD. White bars indicate aerobic expression, and black bars indicate anaerobic expression levels of activity. SB1003 is the parent strain, and MS01 is a regA-disrupted strain. Error bars represent standard deviations for triplicate assays. ß-Galactosidase units are reported as nmol of ONPG hydrolyzed per minute per milligram of protein.

We also undertook similar analysis of the crtA operon, which codes for spheroidene monooxygenase (CrtA), an enzyme late in the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway (2, 3, 4) and two subunits of Mg-chelatase (bchD and bchI), the first enzyme in the Mg-tetrapyrrole branch of the bacteriochlorophyll a biosynthetic pathway (10). For this analysis, we used a bchD::lacZ translational expression vector that contains the crtA promoter region (22). Expression of bchD::lacZ (crtA operon) in the parent strain, SB1003, showed an approximate threefold increase in expression as these cells were shifted from aerobic to anaerobic growth conditions (Fig. 2). In contrast, there was no induction, and indeed a slight reduction, in bchD::lacZ expression when the regA-disrupted strain MS01 was shifted to anaerobiosis.

Divergently transcribed from the crtA-bchIDO operon is the crtIBK operon, which codes for phytoene dehydrogenase (crtI) and phytoene synthase (crtB), the first two enzymes in the biosynthetic pathway for the carotenoid spheroidenone (3, 4). Previous promoter mapping studies have demonstrated that the crtA and crtI promoters are both present in the crtA-crtI intergenic region, with the start sites of crtA and crtI separated by 66 bp (14). Analysis of crtI::lacZ expression in the parent strain, SB1003, showed that crtI::lacZ expression is approximately twofold higher under anaerobic conditions than under aerobic growth conditions (Fig. 2). As is the case for bchD::lacZ (crtA operon) expression, there is no anaerobic induction of crtI::lacZ expression in the regA-disrupted strain MS01.

RegA* binds to bchE, crtI, and crtA promoter regions. We first undertook primer extension analysis of the bchE transcription start site using a primer that was designed from the 5' region of bchE. Primer extension analysis resulted in three equally strong 5'-end products located 31, 38, and 43 bp upstream of the bchE start codon (Fig. 3). Analysis of the region upstream of the furthest upstream primer extension product showed the presence of two putative –10 and –35 -70 RNA polymerase binding sites that are similar to two previously noted putative -70 RNA polymerase binding sites upstream of the bchE gene (2). These regions are indicated in Fig. 3.

View larger version (31K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 3. Primer extension analysis of bchE RNA. Stable mRNA 5' ends are indicated by arrows next to a dideoxy sequencing ladder (indicated by G, C, A, and T). Arrows next to the sequence indicate the locations of the 5' end and the direction of transcription. Open boxes indicate putative -70-type –10 and –35 consensus promoter recognition sequences.

We investigated whether the constitutively active variant of RegA called RegA* (13) could specifically bind to the bchE, crtA, and crtI promoter regions. Prior studies indicated that RegA* binds to identical sites as wild-type RegA does but with a significantly higher affinity (9, 13). For this analysis, we undertook DNase I protection assays using 6-FAM-fluorescently labeled DNA probes specific to the bchE and crtA-crtI promoter regions with the fluorescent label on the 5' end of either the top or bottom strands.

DNase I protection assays of RegA* binding to the bchE promoter region showed several areas that exhibited a reproducible reduction of peak height in the elution profile (Fig. 4a and b; see also Fig. S1a to e in the supplemental material). The top and bottom strands exhibited three regions of protection by RegA* with significant overlap in top and bottom strand protection (Fig. 5). Areas of observed top strand protection span from bp –148 to –121, from –86 to –62, and from –52 to –29 relative to the start site of bchE transcription (Fig. 5). Areas of bottom strand protection extend from bp –145 to –122, from –75 to –48, and from –38 to –14 relative to the start site of bchE. Each of the RegA* protected regions in the bchE promoter region contain putative RegA binding sequences, based on an alignment of protected sequences with known RegA/RegA* binding sites (Fig. 6) (31).

View larger version (80K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 4. DNase I footprint analysis of RegA* to the bchE and crtA-crtI promoter regions. Each footprint reaction was located to a distinct sequence by running parallel didioxy G, C, T, and A reactions using FAM-labeled DNA segments, with the G sequencing ladders shown as an example. Underlined regions correspond to areas of DNase I protection. Hypersensitive sites are indicated by an asterisk. RegA* concentrations are indicated in each line. Regions of protection corresponding to the sequence are indicated by a box on the bottom of the sequence. Numbering above the peak profiles and above the sequence is relative to the start of transcription for bchE (A) and crtA (B).

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 5. Summary of identified RegA* regulatory binding sites. Arrows indicate start sites of transcription. Brackets indicate top and bottom strands of protection. Black and open boxes indicate RNA polymerase promoter recognition sequences.

View larger version (64K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 6. Alignment of three bchE regions and the crtA-crtI region of DNase I protection by RegA* to previously identified RegA binding sites. The consensus pattern is shown below.

DNase I protection assays of RegA* binding to the divergent crtA-crtI promoter region show reproducible reduction of peak height in a discrete region of the elution profile (Fig. 4b; see also Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Inspection of the protected sequence indicates that the area of top and bottom strand protection spans a region that is equidistant (37 and 35 bp, respectively) from the start of crtA and crtI transcription (Fig. 5). This area contains a single putative RegA binding sequence, based on an alignment with RegA/RegA* protected areas that have been identified in other studies (Fig. 6) (31).

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
This study demonstrates that RegA* binds to the bchE and crtA-crtI promoter regions. There is also a decrease in bacteriochlorophyll and carotenoid gene expression that occurs upon disruption of RegA. The most straightforward interpretation is that the RegB-RegA regulon (Reg regulon) is directly involved in positive transcriptional activation of anaerobic expression of enzymes in the Mg-tetrapyrrole branch of the bacteriochlorophyll a biosynthetic pathway as well as enzymes in the spheroidenone pathway.

Expression of the bchEJG-orf428-bchP-idi operon is clearly directly controlled by RegA. This operon codes for Mg-protoporphyrin IX monomethyl ester oxidative cyclase (BchE), which is responsible for catalyzing the formation of the isocyclic (fifth) ring in bacteriochlorophyll (8, 10). This operon also codes for enzymes involved in later steps of the pathway, such as bchJ, which encodes bacteriochlorophyll 4-vinyl reductase (28), and bchG and bchP, which encode enzymes involved in the attachment of geranylgeranyl and its subsequent reduction to phytol, respectively (Fig. 1 and 7) (11). The idi gene in this operon also codes for an enzyme that is crucial in the activation of isopentyl diphosphate as a substrate for the isoprenoid pathway (10, 11, 16). Anaerobic induction of expression of the crtA-bchIDO operon is also mediated by RegA. This operon codes for the BchI and BchD subunits of Mg-chelatase, which is involved in insertion of Mg²⁺ into protoporphyrin IX, which is the first committed step of the bacteriochlorophyll a branch (2, 10). Thus, RegA has a significant role in regulating the partitioning of tetrapyrroles into the Mg-branch under anaerobiosis.

View larger version (26K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 7. Summary of genes regulated by RegA. The filled red circles with a + indicate genes directly under RegA control based on gene expression and DNase I protection studies. Open red circles with a + indicate genes under RegA control as assayed by gene expression studies.

In addition to regulating bacteriochlorophyll production, we have also shown that RegA controls expression of the crtIBK operon, which codes for phytoene synthase (crtI) and phytoene dehydrogenase (crtB), enzymes that catalyze the first committed steps in the synthesis of spheroidenone (2, 3, 4). The divergent crtA and crtI promoters appear to contain a single RegA* binding site located approximately equidistant from the start site of transcription for both of these promoters. Thus, binding of RegA* to this single site allows coordinate expression of the crtA-bchIDO operon, which codes for the first enzymes in the Mg-tetrapyrrole branch of the bacteriochlorophyll pathway, and the crtIBK operon, which encodes the first two enzymes in the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway. Presumably, this allows RegA to control stoichiometric synthesis of these two photopigments.

Prior studies also indicated that RegA has a major role in controlling synthesis of the light harvesting and reaction center apoproteins that bind bacteriochlorophyll and carotenoid photopigments to form the pigmented components of the photosystem (20, 26). Indeed, inspection of gene expression assays from this and other studies (20, 26) indicates that RegA is responsible for significant increases in anaerobic transcription from the puf, puc, and puh promoters, which drive high-level photosystem apoprotein expression and anaerobic transcription from the bchE, crtI, and crtA promoters that express many enzymes involved in bacteriochlorophyll and carotenoid biosynthesis. Thus, the RegA regulon appears to have a major role in regulating synthesis of virtually all of the pigment and polypeptide components of the Rhodobacter photosystem (Fig. 7).

In addition to photosystem synthesis, the RegA regulon has a major role in controlling synthesis of heme and cytochrome apoproteins that bind heme (27, 30, 31). For example, expression of cytochromes c_y and c₂ and the bc₁ complex, which donate electrons from the ubiquinone pool to the reaction center, is regulated by RegA (31). Furthermore, RegA also controls both aerobic and anaerobic expression of various electron acceptors, such as ubiquinol oxidase, cbb₃ oxidase, and dimethyl sulfoxide reductase, which in turn donate electrons derived from the quinone pool to the terminal electron acceptors O₂ and dimethyl sulfoxide, respectively (30). Thus, the RegA regulon controls expression of virtually all components of the photosystem and respiratory electron transfer system and is therefore a key regulator of these different growth modes.

 
This study was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (GM40941) awarded to C.E.B.

We thank Aaron Setterdahl for careful reading of the manuscript.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biology, Jordan Hall, Bloomington, IN 47405. Phone: (812) 855-6595. Fax: (812) 856-4178. E-mail: cbauer{at}bio.indiana.edu

Published ahead of print on 6 July 2007.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1
1. Abada, E. M., A. Balzer, A. Jager, and G. Klug. 2002. Bacteriochlorophyll-dependent expression of genes for pigment-binding proteins in Rhodobacter capsulatus involves the RegB/RegA two component system. Mol. Gen. Genomics 267:202-209.[CrossRef][Medline]
2
2. Alberti, M., D. H. Burke, and J. E. Hearst. 1995. Structure and sequence of the photosynthesis gene cluster, p. 1083-1106. In R. E. Blankenship, M. T. Madigan, and C. E. Bauer (ed.), Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
3
3. Armstrong, G. A. 1995. Genetic analysis and regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis. Structure and function of the crt genes and gene products, p. 1135-1157. In R. E. Blankenship, M. T. Madigan, and C. E. Bauer (ed.), Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
4
4. Armstrong, G. A., A. Schmidt, G. Sandmann, and J. E. Hearst. 1990. Genetic and biochemical characterization of carotenoid biosynthesis mutants of Rhodobacter capsulatus. J. Biol. Chem. 265:8329-8338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Bauer, C. E. 2001. Regulating synthesis of the purple bacterial photosystem, p. 67-83. In R. E. Blankenship, M. T. Madigan, and C. E. Bauer (ed.), Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
6
6. Bauer, C. E., and T. H. Bird. 1996. Regulatory circuits controlling photosynthesis gene expression. Cell 85:5-8.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
7. Bauer, C. E., S. Elsen, L. R. Swem, D. L. Swem, and S. Masuda. 2003. Redox and light regulation of gene expression in photosynthetic prokaryotes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 358:147-154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8
8. Beale, S. I. 2000. Tetrapyrrole biosynthesis in bacteria, p. 558-570. In J. Lederberg (ed.), Encyclopedia of microbiology, 2nd ed., vol. 4. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
9
9. Bird, T. H., S. Du, and C. E. Bauer. 1999. Autophosphorylation, phosphotransfer and DNA binding characteristics of the RegB-RegA two component regulon involved in controlling anaerobic gene expression in Rhodobacter capsulatus. J. Biol. Chem. 274:16343-16348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10
10. Bollivar, D. W., J. Y. Suzuki, J. T. Beatty, J. M. Dobrowolski, and C. E. Bauer. 1994. Directed mutational analysis of bacteriochlorophyll a biosynthesis in Rhodobacter capsulatus. J. Mol. Biol. 237:622-640.[CrossRef][Medline]
11
11. Bollivar, D. W., S. Wang, J. P. Allen, and C. E. Bauer. 1994. Molecular genetic analysis of terminal steps in bacteriochlorophyll a biosynthesis: characterization of a Rhodobacter capsulatus strain that synthesizes geranylgeraniol-esterified bacteriochlorophyll a. Biochemistry 33:12763-12768.[CrossRef][Medline]
12
12. Bollivar, D. W. 2006. Recent advances in chlorophyll biosynthesis. Photosynth. Res. 89:1-22.[CrossRef]
13
13. Du, S., T. H. Bird, and C. E. Bauer. 1998. DNA binding characteristics of RegA. A constitutively active anaerobic activator of photosynthesis gene expression in Rhodobacter capsulatus. J. Biol. Chem. 273:18509-18513.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14
14. Elsen, S., S. N. Ponnampalam, and C. E. Bauer. 1998. CrtJ bound to distant binding sites interacts cooperatively to aerobically repress photopigment biosynthesis and light harvesting II gene expression in Rhodobacter capsulatus. J. Biol. Chem. 273:30762-30769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
15. Elsen, S., L. R. Swem, D. L. Swem, and C. E. Bauer. 2004. RegB/RegA, a highly conserved redox-responding global two-component regulatory system. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68:263-279.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
16. Hahn, F. M., J. A. Baker, and C. D. Pouler. 1996. Open reading frame 176 in the photosynthesis gene cluster of Rhodobacter capsulatus encodes idi, a gene for isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase. J. Bacteriol. 178:619-624.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
17. Kaplan, S., J. Eraso, and J. H. Roh. 2005. Interacting regulatory networks in the facultative photosynthetic bacterium, Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33:51-55.[CrossRef][Medline]
18
18. Mao, L., C. Mackenzie, J. H. Roh, J. M. Eraso, S. Kaplan, and H. Resat. 2005. Combining microarray and genomic data to predict DNA binding motifs. Microbiology 151:3197-3213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19
19. Minton, N. P. 1984. Improved plasmid vectors for the isolation of translational lac gene fusions. Gene 31:269-273.[CrossRef][Medline]
20
20. Mosley, C. S., J. Y. Suzuki, and C. E. Bauer. 1994. Identification and molecular genetic characterization of a sensor kinase responsible for coordinately regulating light harvesting and reaction center gene expression in response to anaerobiosis. J. Bacteriol. 176:7566-7573.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21
21. Oh, J.-I., J. M. Eraso, and S. Kaplan. 2000. Interacting regulatory circuits involved in orderly control of photosynthesis gene expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1. J. Bacteriol. 182:3081-3087.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22
22. Ponnampalam, S. N., J. J. Buggy, and C. E. Bauer. 1995. Characterization of an aerobic repressor that coordinately regulates bacteriochlorophyll, carotenoid, and light harvesting-II expression in Rhodobacter capsulatus. J. Bacteriol. 177:2990-2997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23
23. Prentki, P., and H. M. Kirsch. 1984. In vitro insertional mutagenesis with a selectable DNA fragment. Gene 29:303-313.[CrossRef][Medline]
24
24. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
25
25. Schell, W. Y., and M. A. Schell. 2000. Footprinting with an automated capillary DNA sequencer. BioTechniques 29:1034-1041.[Medline]
26
26. Sganga, M. W., and C. E. Bauer. 1992. Regulatory factors controlling photosynthetic reaction center and light-harvesting gene expression in Rhodobacter capsulatus. Cell 68:945-995.[CrossRef][Medline]
27
27. Smart, J. L., J. W. Willett, and C. E. Bauer. 2004. Regulation of hem gene expression in Rhodobacter capsulatus by redox and photosystem regulators RegA, CrtJ, FnrL, and AerR. J. Mol. Biol. 342:1171-1186.[CrossRef][Medline]
28
28. Suzuki, J. Y., and C. E. Bauer. 1995. Altered monovinyl and divinyl protochlorophyllide pools in bchJ mutants of Rhodobacter capsulatus. Possible monovinyl substrate discrimination of light-independent protochlorophyllide reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 270:3732-3740.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29
29. Suzuki, J. Y., D. W. Bollivar, and C. E. Bauer. 1997. Genetic analysis of chlorophyll biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 31:61-89.[CrossRef][Medline]
30
30. Swem, D. L., and C. E. Bauer. 2002. Coordination of ubiquinol oxidase and cytochrome cbb₃ oxidase expression by multiple regulators in Rhodobacter capsulatus. J. Bacteriol. 184:2815-2820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31
31. Swem, L., S. Elsen, T. H. Bird, H.-G. Koch, H. Myllykallio, F. Daldal, and C. E. Bauer. 2001. The RegB/RegA two-component regulatory system controls synthesis of photosynthesis and respiratory electron transfer components in Rhodobacter capsulatus. J. Mol. Biol. 309:121-138.[CrossRef][Medline]
32
32. Wilson, D. O., P. Johnson, and B. R. McCord. 2001. Nonradiochemical DNase I footprinting by capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 22:1979-1986.[CrossRef][Medline]
33
33. Yen, H. C., and B. Marrs. 1976. Map of genes for carotenoid and bacteriochlorophyll biosynthesis in Rhodopseudomonas capsulata. J. Bacteriol. 126:619-629.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34
34. Young, D. A., C. E. Bauer, J. C. Williams, and B. L. Marrs. 1989. Genetic evidence for superoperonal organization of genes for photosynthetic pigments and pigment-binding proteins in Rhodobacter capsulatus. Mol. Gen. Genet. 218:1-12.[CrossRef][Medline]

---

Journal of Bacteriology, November 2007, p. 7765-7773, Vol. 189, No. 21
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00853-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Eraso, J. M., Kaplan, S. (2009). Regulation of Gene Expression by PrrA in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1: Role of Polyamines and DNA Topology. J. Bacteriol. 191: 4341-4352 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Eraso, J. M., Kaplan, S. (2009). Half-Site DNA Sequence and Spacing Length Contributions to PrrA Binding to PrrA Site 2 of RSP3361 in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1. J. Bacteriol. 191: 4353-4364 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gomelsky, L., Moskvin, O. V., Stenzel, R. A., Jones, D. F., Donohue, T. J., Gomelsky, M. (2008). Hierarchical Regulation of Photosynthesis Gene Expression by the Oxygen-Responsive PrrBA and AppA-PpsR Systems of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J. Bacteriol. 190: 8106-8114 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kim, E.-J., Kim, J.-S., Lee, I.-H., Rhee, H. J., Lee, J. K. (2008). Superoxide Generation by Chlorophyllide a Reductase of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J. Biol. Chem. 283: 3718-3730 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Supplemental material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Willett, J. Articles by Bauer, C. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Willett, J. Articles by Bauer, C. E.