Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, December 2007, p. 8503-8509, Vol. 189, No. 23
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00769-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Chemical Engineering, Life Sciences and Bioengineering Center, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 60 Prescott St., Worcester, Massachusetts 01605
Received 17 May 2007/ Accepted 14 September 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
P. aeruginosa strains are motile, express pili, flagella, and lipopolysaccharides (LPS), and secrete extracellular polymers (ECP), which includes polysaccharides (18, 46) and may include proteins, nucleic acids, and membrane vesicles (26). The latter include a mixture of outer membrane proteins, LPS, phospholipids, and periplasmic constituents (6, 35). These molecules are important in the release of extracellular virulence factors, biofilm formation, transport of antibiotics, and cell surface-related properties, such as adhesion and motility (7, 14, 29, 45). Therefore, the development of new vaccines and antimicrobial agents can be aided by the identification and improved characterization of outer membrane proteins, pili, LPS, and ECP.
LPS molecules are present on the outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria with significant variations in coverage, thickness, and local distribution (49). The three components of LPS are lipid A, core polysaccharides, and O-specific chains (12, 39). Characteristics of LPS, such as three-dimensional structure and number of repeating units, contribute to bacterial adhesion (11) and in part, determine cellular physicochemical properties, such as hydrophobicity, interfacial energy, and electrostatic charge (17, 43, 51).
The LPS structure of some strains of P. aeruginosa has been well studied. For example, P. aeruginosa PAO1 is a genetically well-characterized serotype O5 wild-type strain (18, 45). It is a smooth strain because it expresses the serotype-specific O antigen (B-band) and the common A-band antigen (A+ B+) (21). P. aeruginosa AK1401 (expresses the A-band but not the B band [A+ B–]), with one repeating saccharide unit (A-band only) that consists of neutral polysaccharides, is a semirough mutant of PAO1 (5, 31). Nuclear magnetic resonance and chemical analyses showed that the core LPS regions of PAO1 and AK1401 were identical (41).
Rivera et al. and Stoica et al. suggest that the A- and B-bands from P. aeruginosa PAO1 strain are antigenically and chemically distinct (37, 38, 44). A-band is present in many standard serotype and clinical strains, so it appears to be a common P. aeruginosa antigen (35). A-bands lack reactive amino sugars and phosphate; A-bands contain mainly repeating trisaccharides of
-D-rhamnose, with small amounts of ribose, mannose, glucose, and 3-O-methylhexose (3). A-band molecules are less negatively charged than B-band molecules are (37). B-band is the serotype-specific antigen composed of di- to pentasaccharide repeats (9). B-bands contain much longer polysaccharides than A-bands do, and they are concentrated in amino sugars, but low in sulfate and rhamnose (38). The O antigen of strain PAO1 is composed of residues of amino derivatives of uronic acid with a trisaccharide repeating unit of the ß-D-manno configuration and N-acetyl-D-fucosamine (28, 29). However, the distribution of A- and B-bands on the cell surface is still not clearly known; it is not known whether the LPS types are randomly distributed or present in distinct domains (34). There are still unresolved questions among experts in this field as to whether A-band and B-band molecules are present on adjacent LPS molecules (30, 37) or on the same LPS molecule (22).
P. aeruginosa PAO1 also produces ECP, including anionic polysaccharides that play a role in biofilm formation (52), as well as numerous other compounds, including proteins, nucleic acids, compounds in membrane vesicles, and lipids (24). While few studies have addressed differences in the ECP of strains PAO1 and AK1401, it has been noted that membrane vesicles released by PAO1 contained more protein than membrane vesicles released by AK1401 (35).
In our study, we used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to characterize the physical properties of bacterial surface molecules (LPS and ECP) associated with P. aeruginosa PAO1 and AK1401. Macroscopic tests, such as zeta potential and contact angle measurements, were also used to help characterize the bacterial surfaces. AFM was used to measure the forces of adhesion between the bacterial strains and a model surface, silicon. We then correlated the direct measurements of adhesion force with information on the physical properties of the surface molecules of these two bacterial strains.
|
|
|---|
Bacterial cell attachment to clean glass slides. Micro cover glass slides (VWR International, West Chester, PA) were cleaned with a 4:1 mixture of H2SO4 and H2O2, respectively. They were kept in the acid solution for 25 min and then rinsed with ultrapure water.
Bacterial cell suspensions were centrifuged at 3,500 x g for 15 min. The supernatant was eluted, and the pellet was washed once with ultrapure water and resuspended in ultrapure water. Differences in the bacterial surfaces made it necessary to use two protocols to bond bacteria to the slides. The binding protocol used for strain AK1401 involves a 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC)-N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) cross-linking reaction and has been used extensively in our laboratory for Pseudomonas putida immobilization to glass (2). For strain PAO1, poly-L-lysine (PLL) was used to attach bacteria to the slides. In another study, we systematically evaluated the binding of bacteria, including P. aeruginosa, to glass slides using the EDC-NHS reaction, PLL attachment, and mechanical trapping (32). All three methods resulted in similar bacterial images and similar force profiles with the AFM.
(i) Attachment of P. aeruginosa AK1401. The clean glass slides were treated with ethanol for 5 min and then treated with methanol for 5 min. The glass slides were incubated in 10% aminosilane (3-aminopropyl dimethoxysilane; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) solution in methanol for 15 min. The glass slides were rinsed with 50 ml of methanol and then with 25 ml of water and kept in methanol until the bacterial suspension was added to the slides. The cell suspension was treated with 300 µl of 100 mM EDC (Pierce Cellomics, Rockford, IL) at pH 5.5 and left to equilibrate for 3 min. The treatment with EDC was followed by the addition of 300 µl of 40 mM N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide (Sulfo-NHS) (Pierce Cellomics, Rockford, IL) at pH 7.5 to the mixture. The bacterial suspension with EDC-Sulfo-NHS was equilibrated for 10 min and added to the aminosilane-treated clean glass slides. The glass slides with bacterial suspension were agitated for 12 h at 70 rpm at room temperature to promote bacterial attachment.
(ii) Attachment of P. aeruginosa PAO1. Clean glass slides were soaked in 100 µl of 0.1% (wt/vol) PLL solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and the PLL solution was allowed to dry for 2 h. Then, the bacterial suspension in water was added to PLL-treated glass slides and kept on the shaker at 70 rpm for 2 h to promote bacterial attachment.
Bacterial interaction and adhesion force measurements with AFM. A Dimension 3100 atomic force microscope with Nanoscope IIIa controller (Veeco Metrology, Inc., Santa Barbara, CA) was used. CSC38-B type silicon cantilevers (Mikromasch, Wilsonville, OR) were used for all force curve measurements. According to the manufacturer, the radius of these tips is <10 nm.
Spring constants (kc) were measured using a thermal technique (8). Five noise spectra were captured for each cantilever before and after the AFM experiments, and the kc values from each spectrum were calculated and averaged. We used a different tip for each experiment and measured the kc each time. The average kc value was 0.16 ± 0.08 N·m–1 (n = 30).
Interactions of P. aeruginosa with silicon were investigated by AFM in HEPES buffer. Ten different bacterial cells were tested, and five force curves were captured for each cell. The approach and retraction portions of the AFM force profiles were captured. The deflection voltage-separation distance curves were converted into force versus separation curves (force measured in nanonewtons, and separation measured in nanometers) (15). The pulling rate was constant at 2.39 µm/s for all experiments.
Bacterial physicochemical characterizations. (i) Contact angle measurements. Bacteria were harvested at mid-exponential growth phase and washed three times with HEPES buffer and resuspended in the same solution. Four milliliters of the bacterial cell suspension was poured onto a 0.45-µm filter (membrane filters; Millipore, Billerica, MA) and vacuum filtered. The filters (containing >108 cells·mm–2) were dried for 45 min, which was determined to be the optimum drying time for the bacterial lawn (20). Subsequently, contact angle measurements were taken at room temperature for water, diiodomethane, and formamide using a goniometer (model 100-00; Ramé-Hart, Netcong, NJ) by the sessile drop technique. Eight filters were prepared for each P. aeruginosa strain, and contact angle values were averaged and used for surface free energy calculations (10).
(ii) Zeta potential measurements.
A Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments, Southborough, MA) and disposable folded capillary cells (Malvern Instruments, Southborough, MA) were used to measure the zeta potentials (
) of the bacterial suspensions at room temperature, using the Smoluchowski equation (16). Bacteria were washed once with HEPES buffer and resuspended in the same solution. For strain AK1401 only, we also measured the
values on bacteria that had been treated with the EDC-NHS procedure used for bacterial attachment to the slides, since EDC and NHS were added into the solution with the bacteria during that process, and may have affected the
values. We did not consider the effect of PLL on the zeta potential of strain PAO1, because PLL was never added into the bacterial solution but was only on the glass slide. The zeta potentials of all samples were measured six times and averaged.
(iii) Surface free energy calculations.
Interfacial interactions, such as Lifshitz-van der Waals (LW) and Lewis acid-base (AB) interactions, govern the initial steps of bacterial adhesion (25). LW interactions are apolar, whereas AB interactions are polar and comprise all electron-acceptor and electron-donor interactions (48). The apolar and polar components of the interfacial free energy are additive and can be described as shown below in equations 1 and 2 (48):
![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
i is the total surface free energy of component i,
is the LW component of the surface free energy,
is the AB component of the surface free energy, and
i+ and
i– are the electron acceptor and donor components, respectively.
Young developed an expression to describe the connection between adhesion and the surface tension of a solid (
S) and a liquid (
L) by using the interfacial tension between solid and liquid (
SL), and the contact angle (
) made by a drop of liquid L (48). The Dupré equation expresses the relation between the work of adhesion between a solid and a liquid (48). Inserting the Dupré equation into the Young equation, and combining them with the expressions for apolar and polar interactions, a more precise expression, the Young-Dupré equation (equation 3), can be obtained (48).
![]() | (3) |
|
|
|---|
values indicated that AK1401 was more electrostatically negative than PAO1 and that the EDC-NHS treatment did not alter the surface charge of the bacteria (Table 1). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial surface properties measured at room temperature
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. (A) Representative AFM approach and (B) retraction curves of P. aeruginosa strains AK1401 and PAO1. Five data sets that represent typical data obtained for five bacteria are shown. In total, 10 bacteria were examined per condition, and five measurements were made over the center of each cell.
|
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Box plots showing the median and distribution of the decay length (Lo) (A) and the repulsive force at zero distance (Fo) (B) for P. aeruginosa strains from AFM approach curves.
|
1 nN, occurred at shorter distances from the surface for strain AK1401 than for strain PAO1 (Fig. 1B). In previous investigations, a single sharp peak was observed when there was no polymer in the system, such as when probing a clean glass slide (4). The distributions of the pull-off distances for P. aeruginosa showed evidence of much longer polymers for strain PAO1 than for strain AK1401 (Fig. 3A). The median Lo values were 567 nm and 320 nm, for PAO1 and AK1401, respectively. The pull-off distances do not directly tell the length of the polymers, but they are related to both polymer length and to how much the polymer can be stretched by the AFM tip.
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Histograms showing the distributions of the pull-off distances (A) and pull-off forces (B) (n = 30 for each) of P. aeruginosa strains with clean silicon AFM tips. (C) Compilation of all of the adhesion peaks observed in the retraction profiles.
|
|
|
|---|
For strain PAO1, PLL was used to help bacteria attach to glass slides. The bacterial surface molecules that interacted with PLL remain on the underside of the bacteria, and there was no excess PLL in solution to interact with the bacteria. Therefore, we did not observe artifacts in our force measurements, which were always made on top of the bacteria. The appropriateness of these two methods was discussed in our previous work, where we showed that bacteria immobilized for AFM experiments through the EDC-NHS reaction, PLL adsorption, or mechanical trapping all exhibited similar properties in the AFM images and force measurements (32).
Roles of bacterial LPS and ECP on interaction profiles. The repulsive forces observed from the AFM approach profiles are likely a combination of steric repulsion from the long extracellular molecules, with some electrostatic contribution for strain PAO1, which may be attributable to the negatively charged B-band LPS molecules. In addition, the ECP of P. aeruginosa is anionic (52) and may have had an electrostatic interaction with silicon. It is often impossible to separate the effects of LPS and the other polymers, because as previously noted, the O side chains of PAO1 seem to form an integrated continuum with bacterial ECP (24). For strain AK1401, the LPS has only neutral side chain polysaccharides (A-bands), so the repulsive forces at zero distance (Fo) must be caused by steric interactions or by electrosteric effects from the extracellular polymers. The repulsive forces of strain PAO1 were greater than those of strain AK1401, presumably because strain PAO1 has negatively charged O-side chain polysaccharides (B-bands).
The decay lengths from AFM approach curves can be related to the lengths of the surface polymers of bacteria (2, 11), but an exact determination is difficult, particularly when there is strong electrosteric repulsion (11). Specifically, when the repulsion is stronger, the decay length from the approach curves becomes larger and less representative of the physical length of the bacterial surface polymers. The decay length of strain PAO1 (Lo = 275 ± 38 nm) was longer than that of strain AK1401 (Lo = 71 ± 15 nm).
In the AFM retraction profiles, both P. aeruginosa strains showed several adhesion peaks with different magnitudes, indicating that multiple binding sites on single polymers or that several different polymers might be involved in determining the total interactions with silicon. The fact that the interactions occurred over such a long range also indicated that the polymers are elastic and might be coiled on the bacterial surface, becoming unfolded as they were pulled with the AFM tip. The large sizes suggest that LPS alone cannot be responsible for causing the adhesive interactions, since no studies have shown such large LPS molecules. The common antigen (A-band) polymer is comprised of 10 to 20 repeating
-D-rhamnose units (3). Strain PAO1, in addition to expressing A-bands, has 30 to 50 O-repeating units of B-band polymer, with an approximate length of 39 to 65 nm (29). Prior research was unable to determine whether the O chains were extended or coiled on the bacterial surfaces (29). Pili have also been found to be an important contributor to long-range interactions observed from AFM force profiles. For example, an AFM investigation of PAO1 showed that type IV pili were responsible for large pull-off distances, reaching 400 to 3,000 nm (46). In extensive AFM imaging of the P. aeruginosa strains that were grown under the conditions of the present study, we never observed pili in the images (1, 4). Therefore, on the basis of the molecular sizes we observed from the AFM measurements and because we did not detect any pili, ECP were the most likely molecules to have interacted with the tip during the adhesion events that occurred in the range of hundreds of nanometers.
In a previous work, we extracted the ECP from strains PAO1 and AK1401 through several centrifugation, supercentrifugation, and ultracentifugation steps with washing in between. We found that the supernatant material, when dried on a glass slide, formed 120-nm clusters for PAO1 but 17-nm clusters for AK1401 (4). Although the ECP may contain proteins, the sizes of the molecules observed and the magnitude of the forces measured in the AFM investigations are more consistent with what has been observed in other studies of exopolysaccharides, such as forces that decayed at distances of
1,000 nm for ECP isolated from Pseudomonas atlantica (19).
Physicochemical bacterial surface properties. The macroscopic measurements of bacterial zeta potential and contact angle do not provide enough information to explain the interaction profiles and adhesion forces measured by AFM. P. aeruginosa AK1401 is slightly more hydrophobic than P. aeruginosa PAO1 is, according to the water contact angle measurements. However, the total surface free energies of strain PAO1 and strain AK1401 were relatively similar and also close to values observed for many other types of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria (42). Surface free energy components include only Lifshitz-van der Waals and Lewis acid-base interactions. In this study, electrostatic and steric interactions appeared to dominate the bacterial interaction force profiles observed. A previous investigation of the surface hydrophobicity of P. aeruginosa strains, measured by hydrophobic interaction chromatography, showed that the hydrophobicities could be ranked as follows: A+ B– (AK1401) > A– B– > A+ B+ (PAO1) > A– B+ (34). In another study, B-band LPS were hypothesized to influence the initial attachment of the bacterium to hydrophilic surfaces, since the presence of the B-band made the strains more hydrophilic (40).
Previous work showed that P. aeruginosa cells lacking B-band LPS had higher surface electronegativity than strain PAO1, which the authors attributed to the core region of the LPS holding most of the groups determining surface charge (34). In our experiments, we confirmed that strain AK1401 was more electostatically negative than PAO1 was, but we cannot rule out the possibility that differences in ECP produced by these two strains could have contributed to the differences in zeta potential, rather than an effect due to exposure of the core and lipid A region for AK1401.
In summary, since physicochemical bacterial surface properties are calculated from the macroscopic scale, not for an individual bacterium, they are similar for both strains. However, the AFM measurements go beyond the single-cell level, and in fact, we are measuring the properties of individual molecules or small groups of molecules. For this reason, AFM results often cannot be explained with simple correlations of bacterial physicochemical properties based on macroscopic assays (47). The AFM investigations of P. aeruginosa LPS and ECP suggested that both types of molecules are very important in influencing the interfacial behavior of the bacteria, particularly due to electrostatic and steric interactions.
The assistance of Paola Pinzon-Arango, Yatao Liu, Jochen Weiss, and Thrandur Helgason with the zeta potential and contact angle measurements is gratefully acknowledged. We also thank David S. Adams, Ray J. Emerson IV, Nancy Burnham, Elizabeth Ryder, and Laila Abu-Lail for helpful discussions during the course of these studies, and Joshua Strauss for his comments on a previous version of the manuscript.
Published ahead of print on 28 September 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»